Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 10 Jul 2000 10:50:20 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Bringing LPRng into FreeBSD? - License Issues
Message-ID:  <20000710105019.A25631@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <200007101546.JAA28239@nomad.yogotech.com>; from nate@yogotech.com on Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 09:46:22AM -0600
References:  <20000710035352.C92445@dragon.nuxi.com> <21663.963226908@critter.freebsd.dk> <200007101546.JAA28239@nomad.yogotech.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 09:46:22AM -0600, Nate Williams wrote:
> > >> Let me try to state this as clearly as possible:
> > >> If the FreeBSD project wants to distribute LPRng under the BSD
> > >> license,  then I will give them a license to distribute it under
> > >> the BSD license terms.  I would add the following two provisions
> > >> in addition to standard BSD License terms:
> 
> *IFF* LPRng uses a 3-line BSD license, then I withdraw my objection to
> it being in the base system.

Why do you have problems with a BSD-style license with the stipulation
that derived versions are marked as such?
 
-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000710105019.A25631>