Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 12:51:04 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: ia64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64 Message-ID: <20040317205104.GA29066@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20040317200307.GA46126@ip.net.ua> References: <20040317040254.386947303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <xzpad2fhixn.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040317113931.GF49920@ip.net.ua> <20040317200307.GA46126@ip.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 10:03:07PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > >
> > > for(i = 0; i < SOUND_MIXER_NRDEVICES; i++) {
> > > if ((1 << i) & mask) {
> > > v |= mt[i].iselect;
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> >
> Actually, this is easily reproduceable by compiling the corresponding
> module on pluto1 with CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe" set in environment. There's
> clearly a bug in gcc(1), as:
What happens if you replace the for-loop with an equivalent while-loop?
[Sorry, I'm too short on time to try that out myself now...]
--
Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040317205104.GA29066>