Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:48:08 +0100 From: Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net> To: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, sylvio@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken Message-ID: <20110111114808.GT22635@e.0x20.net> In-Reply-To: <20110107113405.GA69904@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20110107072910.91D851CC5C@koala.droso.net> <20110107113405.GA69904@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--dJMCvz8ywNNMqcIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 11:34:05AM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 08:29:10AM +0100, linimon@freebsd.org wrote: > >=20 > > portname: math/dislin > > broken because: size mismatch > > build errors: none. > > overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?categor= y=3Dmath&portname=3Ddislin > >=20 >=20 > Is this a security concern? > I've never used this port before, but it looks intersting. >=20 > By doing >=20 > rm distinfo* > make makesum >=20 > I can install this port. Is this not a good idea? No, it is not. You must check, why the distfile has a different checksum. It may be because there was a back door inserted. --dJMCvz8ywNNMqcIT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk0sQ3gACgkQKc512sD3afgXvQCeIh4k/aBLeHQ+cugjWOBiC77N eZUAnAs+I14R5risSykikBBCmT4qnRkh =gczc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dJMCvz8ywNNMqcIT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110111114808.GT22635>