From owner-freebsd-questions Wed May 9 23:57: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n37.san.rr.com (dt051n37.san.rr.com [204.210.32.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB08C37B422 for ; Wed, 9 May 2001 23:56:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@DougBarton.net) Received: from DougBarton.net (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n37.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA23198; Wed, 9 May 2001 23:56:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@DougBarton.net) Message-ID: <3AFA3B9E.627855F7@DougBarton.net> Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 23:56:30 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Herman Cc: Otter , "FreeBSD-questions (E-mail)" Subject: Re: dump vs tar? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Paul Herman wrote: > In practice, the differences between dump and tar are miniscule. One important difference is that only dump will preserve file system flags like schg, etc. If that's not important to you, or you won't be using your backups to create complete new file systems, tar is generally more flexible. Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message