Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Nov 2001 07:37:14 -0600
From:      D J Hawkey Jr <hawkeyd@visi.com>
To:        questions at FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   XFree86-4.0.2 to XFree86-4.1.0: To upgrade or not?
Message-ID:  <20011114073714.B22520@sheol.localdomain>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello All.

I'm currently running XF86-4.0.2 as distributed as a package on
FreeBSD-4.2REL. The video is i810.

My question is simple, and I hope the answer is also: Is it worth
upgrading to XF86-4.1.0?

What I know is improved is the switching from the X session to the
consoles and back (pardon the inaccurate terminology), and DRI is
supported, but after that, what is the impetus? I don't run "exotic
stuff", I'm not a gamer, and I foresee no need for OpenGL and the
like. I am, however, trying to get Xine to play nice on FreeBSD,
and I wonder if a newer XF86 version plays into this effort. 

I see that XF86-4.1.0 is not distributed as a FreeBSD package, only
as a port. My inclination then is to install the FreeBSD binaries
supplied by XFree86. However, I see the FreeBSD port distribution
has several patches to the source. Is this supposed to raise flags
telling me that installing the port results in a better system, or
are those patches included in the XFree86 binaries?

Finally, come the install, is renaming the two existing X directories
sufficient to keep them safe, or must they be backed up and removed?

OK, so maybe the answer won't be simple.  ;-,

TIA,
Dave

-- 

It took the computing power of three C-64s to fly to the Moon.
It takes an 800Mhz P3 to run Windows XP. Something is wrong here.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011114073714.B22520>