Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:37:25 -0800 From: David Benfell <benfell@parts-unknown.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Total OT] Trying to improve some numbers ... Message-ID: <20060216053725.GB15586@parts-unknown.org> In-Reply-To: <20060216005036.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060216005036.L60635@ganymede.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:01:33 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > FreeBSD is showing 4th place right now behind Linux, SunOS and Netware for > Average Uptimes ... with ours being an average of 120 days > Which shows yet again how utterly worthless this kind of rating is. So here's the problem as *I* see it: Do you participate in such silliness for dubious PR value at the risk of supporting the use of invalid methodology, or do you refuse at the risk of appearing to have something to hide? Now, the way I frame this makes pretty clear *my* preference, but possibly others have other ways to frame it. -- David Benfell, LCP benfell@parts-unknown.org --- Resume available at http://www.parts-unknown.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060216053725.GB15586>