Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 15:50:06 -0500 From: Tadayuki OKADA <tadayuki.okada@windriver.com> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: Tadayuki OKADA <tokada@isi.com>, standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: _MULTI_LIBM Message-ID: <3C925E7E.308508E@windriver.com> References: <20020315153546.N22775-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans wrote: > > It's not POSIX complient nor ANSI. > > It is now :-). C99 supports IEEE754, and doesn't require math functions > to set errno. In this respect, yes. But other portion of FreeBSD is not (yet), so we can't say FreeBSD is C90 complient or C99. BTW, why don't we just define math_errhandling, MATH_ERRNO and MATH_ERREXCEPT in math.h for POSIX complience for now? Or are we waiting for fenv.h? Regards, -- Tadayuki OKADA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C925E7E.308508E>