Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Nov 2013 22:21:46 +0100
From:      Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com>
To:        =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D6zkan_KIRIK?= <ozkan.kirik@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
Subject:   Re: ipfw table add problem
Message-ID:  <CAPS9%2BSv=4J2g8rCbz-99VoQiN8=eNsDWJkNVW6E0g%2B2B-LPTEQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAcX-AHqxnx73%2BP_h0ooK8CNZCM0%2BOo-TckLNHexqnP8bytCpA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAAcX-AGDZbFn5RmhLBBn2PPWRPcsFUnea5MgTc7nuXGD8Ge53A@mail.gmail.com> <CAPS9%2BSv9Um47wzOkfEsA_S7sb-FbQ=aZE2qb7EkFgnzEsrOc%2BQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAcX-AHqxnx73%2BP_h0ooK8CNZCM0%2BOo-TckLNHexqnP8bytCpA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:36 PM, =D6zkan KIRIK <ozkan.kirik@gmail.com> wrot=
e:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com>wro=
te:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:55 PM, =D6zkan KIRIK <ozkan.kirik@gmail.com>wr=
ote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm using kernel FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 #2 r257635 kernel.
>>> I am trying to add port number to ipfw tables. But there is something
>>> strange :
>>> Problem is easily repeatable.
>>>
>>> #ipfw table 1 flush
>>> #ipfw table 1 add 4899
>>> #ipfw table 1 list
>>> ::/0 0
>>>
>> Works with ipfw table 1 add 0 4899
>>
> No, i want to use this table as port list ( to use with "lookup src-port
> 1" ) . If you add like this, you cannot match against ports. Am I wrong?
>
No, that should be possible.

>
>
>>
>>> #ipfw table 1 flush
>>> #ipfw table 1 add 10.2.3.01       ( not 10.0.0.1,   the last 1 has 0 as
>>> prefix )
>>> #ipfw table 1 list
>>> ::/0 0
>>>
>> Did you mean ipfw table 1 add 10.2.3.0 1 ? That works for me.
>>
> Please dont leave spaces between 0 and 1.
>
Ok. any specific reason to type it as 10.2.3.01 instead 0f 10.2.3.1 ?

>
>
>>
>>> #ipfw table 1 delete ::/0
>>> ipfw: setsockopt(IP_FW_TABLE_XDEL): No such process
>>>
>> However ipfw table 1 delete 0.0.0.0/0 does.
>>
> Thank you
>
>>
>>>
>>> I guess that, this problem is related to radix mask calculation
>>> problem/fix.
>>>
>>> Is there a quick solution for this.
>>> Best, regards,
>>
>>
>> Best regards
>> Andreas
>>
>
> Best regards,
> Ozkan.
>
>

Best regards
Andreas



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPS9%2BSv=4J2g8rCbz-99VoQiN8=eNsDWJkNVW6E0g%2B2B-LPTEQ>