Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:43:29 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VLANs and routing Message-ID: <20070615104329.GF1173@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <f4q05k$f68$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <f4q05k$f68$1@sea.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2007-Jun-14 01:55:20 +0200, Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> wrote: >But the (somewhat weird) requirements are that the vlan interface on >machine1 shouldn't have assigned IP address, but the second one should. =2E.. >Is this kind of setup even supported? I don't see how it could be if machine1 is an IP endpoint: In order to transmit a packet, it needs to put a source IP address into the packet - which virtually always comes from the interface. --=20 Peter Jeremy --AqsLC8rIMeq19msA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGcm1R/opHv/APuIcRAozTAJ43EK6euK6f+iZg1XjUXoEQylQLigCeOIco yi9qJ6BCDc88b6yzruQscRg= =HbKv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AqsLC8rIMeq19msA--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070615104329.GF1173>