Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Mar 2000 12:23:05 -0700
From:      Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To:        "Jeroen C. van Gelderen" <jeroen@vangelderen.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Audit List <freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Portmapper enabled, IPv6 circumvents FW 
Message-ID:  <200003231923.MAA42847@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 23 Mar 2000 15:16:07 -0400." <38DA6D77.FB93FC36@vangelderen.org> 
References:  <38DA6D77.FB93FC36@vangelderen.org>  

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <38DA6D77.FB93FC36@vangelderen.org> "Jeroen C. van Gelderen" writes:
: I'd suggest disabling the portmapper in a default installation
: unless there is a good reason not to. 

Sadly too many people want NFS :-(.  It is a big pita to run nfs w/o
portmapper.

: Another solution is to add a comment to /etc/inetd.conf because 
: that's what people usually edit on new systems (because FreeBSD 
: *still* runs ftpd and telnetd by default).

Agreed.

: Opinions?

I've been sent patches that make *ALL* network services off by
default.  I'm thinking seriously about committing them to at least
-current and maybe to -stable also.  These patches also hack
sysinstall to enable them in /etc/rc.conf so as to not effectively
change our system defaults.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003231923.MAA42847>