From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 10 00:16:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681B437B401 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 00:16:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pop016.verizon.net (pop016pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 820B943FB1 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 00:16:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com ([141.149.47.46]) by pop016.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <20030710071604.OWOY3199.pop016.verizon.net@mac.com> for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 02:16:04 -0500 Message-ID: <3F0D12B5.5050503@mac.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 03:16:05 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <000001c345d0$227e4300$1d02a8c0@kids> <20030708224159.A10335@barryg.mi.celestial.com> <20030710104712.C4A3.JOEL@alpsgiken.gr.jp> In-Reply-To: <20030710104712.C4A3.JOEL@alpsgiken.gr.jp> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at pop016.verizon.net from [141.149.47.46] at Thu, 10 Jul 2003 02:16:04 -0500 Subject: Re: Samba between Mac and BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 07:16:06 -0000 Joel Rees wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:11:11PM -0700, esayer1@san.rr.com wrote: [ ... ] >> I would think that NFS would be a better choice between two Unix >> systems than Samba. > > To which I might add that netatalk would seem to me to be a better > option than Samba if the only client is a Mac. > > But then I've never done netatalk on freeBSD. NFS is an entirely reasonable choice for filesharing against OS X; netatalk would be a comparitively better choice for MacOS 9 and previous versions. People who have laptops or other network roaming environments will probably prefer Samba. [How's that for providing a fair slant on what each protocol is well-suited for? :-)] -- -Chuck