Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:13:46 -0700 From: Danny Howard <dannyman@toldme.com> To: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: limits puzzle - different limits on similar machines Message-ID: <20050825191346.GE51748@ratchet.nebcorp.com> In-Reply-To: <430D2304.3030002@mac.com> References: <20050823235642.GP51748@ratchet.nebcorp.com> <B23AAEEF-0AF6-4A66-AEFB-3375580F698C@shire.net> <20050824214038.GU51748@ratchet.nebcorp.com> <430D2304.3030002@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 09:46:44PM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Danny Howard wrote: > >On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 06:52:28PM -0600, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC > >wrote: > >>On Aug 23, 2005, at 5:56 PM, Danny Howard wrote: > >>># bump max datasize > >>>options MAXDSIZ="(1024*1024*1024)" > >>>options MAXSSIZ="(1024*1024*1024)" > >>>options DFLDSIZ="(1024*1024*1024)" > >> > >>Might this not be it? unlimited is really limited by the kernel sys > >>params > [ ... ] > >We can't tune the kernel limits through sysctl, eh? :) > > No, but see /boot/default/loader.conf, you can tune it there without having > to rebuild the kernel... That much I know, but what variables?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050825191346.GE51748>