From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 10 13:33:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7ABB106566B; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:33:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBDE8FC0A; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:33:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C711FE8B4C; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:33:55 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=Vx5/eHEaz9/P as02IDLQIIofUsU=; b=dM30Ulby9aNNLNL7lksEQamaHH+XdXPbulnTCgjnukIB iivpzSs/WvA+CefaIjyTBRECle1hnwcpy/xVaZWFk4mGQ8RQeCY70HeZqB9Kv67Q BQQimpdjhfxATIFy+cVTgRxi6gct7kGjw/p/hpfMG7MR0zpJrf5vbhasJKRhNM4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=Ekle1W kzky+ElZ3mYJMeodFUX3gpStPeBhB098YsjbUvS1nB8OSSW8TiJiecc9IU/Qov6F DrjD93+3Fnz59itCAmza1qySW3+qBSXiDfZpJHf9y0kkVbXkDDe0Sr5VFoe0baka 4A0vrKsxcXYFwazTj4tDpxW6YVpeRdeALCZlA= Received: from unknown (client-86-27-23-77.glfd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.27.23.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83390E8B4B; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:33:55 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:33:51 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Ivan Voras Message-ID: <20110110133351.00007c8b@unknown> In-Reply-To: References: <4D26FBD3.20307@quip.cz> <448737.83863.qm@web110508.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <52B3EE9B-9B4A-4F96-ADE3-83F56135183D@moneybookers.com> <20110110130703.000047b7@unknown> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:33:57 -0000 On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:12:32 +0100 Ivan Voras wrote: > I've also noticed it is bursty - this can be moderated by tuning > vfs.zfs.txg.timeout and vfs.zfs.vdev.max_pending. But I think you > must agree that 210 MB/s on a single drive looks impossible :) I get > that much in a SAS RAID-10 configuration. Exactly: since the disk obviously can't write at 210MB/s (115 seems to be about its maximum) ZFS is buffering the data and then has to spend time flushing it to disk during which time it can't accept any new IO requests. -- Bruce Cran