From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 16 08:03:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393C516A4CE for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 08:03:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.bat.ru (dzokonda.xs4all.nl [194.109.164.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09AF43D1F for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 08:03:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from timur@mail.bat.ru) Received: from [193.0.1.39] (account timur@mail.bat.ru) by mail.bat.ru (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.8) with HTTP id 151294; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 17:03:24 +0100 From: "Timur I. Bakeyev" To: Michael Nottebrock , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.8 Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 17:03:24 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200402131939.44398.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="KOI8-R"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: "Kjell B." Subject: Re: Samba 3.0.2, when? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:03:25 -0000 On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:39:44 +0100 Michael Nottebrock wrote: >On Friday 13 February 2004 18:11, Kjell B. wrote: > >> I hope the waint won't be as long as the time between >>Samba 3.0.1 release >> until it showed up in ports. > >You can accelerate the process by submitting a complete >and working update >yourself. Port-maintainers LOVE complete patches they >just can apply, test, >approve & commit. That exactly what I did two weeks ago - made a port of samba 3.0.2rc1 and send it to David. Unfortunatelly, seems, he still didn't find time to take a look onto it. Maybe, I should make a PR for it, so it'll float around. Anyhow, if someone interested: http://unix.bat.ru/FreeBSD/ports/net/samba-devel.tar.gz Beware, it uses new config: option, so, even fancy, has different usage pattern(The usage of this option is still questionable:). With regards, Timur.