Date: Thu, 25 Dec 1997 06:34:32 -0500 (EST) From: Tim Vanderhoek <hoek@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Dmitrij Tejblum <dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> Cc: Tim Vanderhoek <hoek@FreeBSD.ORG>, h-nokubi@nmit.mt.nec.co.jp, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/2412 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971225061236.24390C-100000@localhost> In-Reply-To: <199712251109.OAA01607@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 25 Dec 1997, Dmitrij Tejblum wrote:
> I don't think it is correct answer. Did you looked to the 'Fix:' in this PR?
> USER_LDT is a 'new style' option that go in opt_user_ldt.h. Files
Well, I glanced over the 'Fix:'. Perhaps too briefly. :)
["Well, Wine works for me and my friends!"]
> sys/i386/i386/machdep.c
> sys/i386/i386/vm_machdep.c
> sys/pc98/i386/machdep.c
> contains #ifdef USER_LDT, but don't contain #include "opt_user_ldt.h".
Rather than trying to guess wether the code is meant to be
compiled or is just stale, I'll move it into feedback and just
double-check that USER_LDT was supposed to have been configured.
Is there someone specific responsible for the USER_LDT stuff who
would be aware of potentially wrong code, or is it worth leaving
the pr open just for that?
--
tIM...HOEk
OPTIMIZATION: the process of using many one-letter variables names
hoping that the resultant code will run faster.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.971225061236.24390C-100000>