Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 09:15:17 -0500 From: Peter Schultz <peter@jocose.org> To: Nuno Teixeira <nunotex@pt-quorum.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: my experience with the SCHED_ULE Message-ID: <3EAA9475.5080402@jocose.org> In-Reply-To: <20030426144701.GA5900@gw.tex.bogus> References: <1051362553.c8e66a40dkt@digitalme.com> <20030426144701.GA5900@gw.tex.bogus>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nuno Teixeira wrote: > On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 09:09:13PM +0800, Dung Patrick wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>My PC is an PIII SMP. I have been using the SCHED_4BSD (with ADAPTIVE_MUTEX) with 5-Current for some time. Now I have tried the SCHED_ULE (with ADAPTIVE_MUTEX). >> >>I have tried some real world applications like Mozilla, xmms, and run inside KDE. The performance is about the same with SCHED_4BSD. But I could notice a little bit slow down/delay when I switch to another process. For example: use the mouse to press the menu bar of konsole and drag it. I could see a small delay before the window moves. >> >>Finally, I would appreicate all the developers for their time and effort on freebsd. >> >>Regards, >>Patrick >> > > Hi, > > A few days ago I tried too SCHED_ULE sheduler and the first thing that I > noticed is that when I run my PII 300 at high load (cvs, compiling > programs, mozilla, etc) my mouse fails a lot its precision. I recompile > the same kernel with old sheduler and it fixed mouse problem. > > Bye, > > Nuno Teixeira > I have been using ULE since it was introduced and have noticed a performance increase over the past week or so. This is on a dual PII 350 configuration. Pete...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EAA9475.5080402>