From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug  9 11:02:09 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7911816A41F;
	Tue,  9 Aug 2005 11:02:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from smtp.xbsd.org (xbsd.org [82.233.2.192])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887B143D48;
	Tue,  9 Aug 2005 11:02:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost (localhost.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4382411695;
	Tue,  9 Aug 2005 13:07:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp.xbsd.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (srv1.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with ESMTP
	id 70403-01; Tue,  9 Aug 2005 13:07:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.20.108] (unknown [83.142.147.11])
	by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2775C1159A;
	Tue,  9 Aug 2005 13:07:44 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <42F88D1D.9070303@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:01:49 +0200
From: Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Xin LI <delphij@frontfree.net>
References: <42F871B4.6000703@freebsd.org>	
	<200508091737.23443.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
	<42F888AD.8070604@FreeBSD.org> <1123584740.779.5.camel@spirit>
In-Reply-To: <1123584740.779.5.camel@spirit>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="------------enig2F6C14A6DB4919A4AE6ECF35"
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at xbsd.org
Cc: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org,
	freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Portsnap is now in the base system
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 11:02:09 -0000

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig2F6C14A6DB4919A4AE6ECF35
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Xin LI wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> =E5=9C=A8 2005-08-09=E4=BA=8C=E7=9A=84 12:42 +0200=EF=BC=8CFlorent Thou=
mie=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
> [snip]
>=20
>>	Default /var size will be bumped. If you're not doing a fresh
>=20
>=20
> While we seems not going to MFC portsnap on 6.0, will it be reasonable
> to bump the default /var value in 6.0-RELEASE so our users won't be
> surprised when they upgrade to 6.1?
>=20
> Just my 0.02 Yuan :-)

	I'm not sure most users will upgrade to 6.0, even if we claim
	it's stable technology, but I'd second this idea.

--=20
Florent Thoumie
flz@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer


--------------enig2F6C14A6DB4919A4AE6ECF35
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFC+I0jMxEkbVFH3PQRAuovAJ9WN3P+7EDu94lfeeM7WtRWjG7vZwCdGDTn
ACFaNqv/y0RyxoZT1tMp7zg=
=SczV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig2F6C14A6DB4919A4AE6ECF35--