From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Sep 3 21:20:47 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA21830 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 21:20:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA21818 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 21:20:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA02568; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 21:18:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Eivind Eklund cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Coidan_Sm=F8rgrav?= , Yoav Cohen-Sivan , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Better SNR suggestion for the mailing lists In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 04 Sep 1998 00:23:02 +0200." <19980904002302.28650@follo.net> Date: Thu, 03 Sep 1998 21:18:57 -0700 Message-ID: <2565.904882737@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > The problem with this is the same as requiring subscriptions for > posting at all - a lot of us are subscribed through different accounts > than we post from (I, for instance, am subscribed through my I think there would be some collateral damage but, compared with the scenario of a rapid exodus of freebsd hacker types from -hackers, definitely the lesser of two evils. People can always just start subscribing and posting from the same address too - I've been doing that for ages and it's no trouble, really. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message