Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:29:38 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Handbook obsolescence scan: "The vinum Volume Manager" Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1306261723480.93402@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgnDWJ%2BJpDN4Rzz=Lm4atmnQeVT705Dt%2BW6Cpj3RkszWPg@mail.gmail.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1306250933560.64224@wonkity.com> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1306252103520.26275@multics.mit.edu> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1306252020120.69077@wonkity.com> <CAF6rxgnDWJ%2BJpDN4Rzz=Lm4atmnQeVT705Dt%2BW6Cpj3RkszWPg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Eitan Adler wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wrote: >> Moving it to an article should cover all the bases. It won't be first-line >> information in the Handbook, but can still be found. And eventually, if not >> already, we can have an archive section for obsolete information that may >> still be useful to someone, somewhere, but not most users. > > I find that articles are less often > - updated > - translated > > so I think that "downgrading" the content to an article is a good step > if we think the information is not useful in the general case. > > However, if the information is obsolete we already have > http://docs.freebsd.org/doc/ and it should be removed entirely. I kind of wish you had pointed that out earlier today, before I made an article version of the vinum chapter. It's ready to commit, but even easier to delete. Speaking of that link: can it be found on from http://www.freebsd.org/docs.html ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1306261723480.93402>