From owner-freebsd-current Sat Feb 1 2:59:29 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C492037B401 for ; Sat, 1 Feb 2003 02:59:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc02.attbi.com (sccrmhc02.attbi.com [204.127.202.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4F943E4A for ; Sat, 1 Feb 2003 02:59:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org (12-232-168-4.client.attbi.com[12.232.168.4]) by sccrmhc02.attbi.com (sccrmhc02) with ESMTP id <2003020110592700200i3gs3e>; Sat, 1 Feb 2003 10:59:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA52377 for ; Sat, 1 Feb 2003 02:59:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 02:59:24 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: FreeBSD current users Subject: split out patch Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm working on backing out david's patch. Part of his megacommit was a patch that should ahve been separatly handled. I have split it out.. Can people have a look at it and see if it makes sense. http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/lock.diff basically locks need to be per thread but were per process. Can we just use a thread* for this? I think so but I wonder why it wasn't a proc* before.. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message