From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 09:14:03 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F59516A469 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2007 09:14:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2B413C461; Fri, 7 Sep 2007 09:14:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <46E11658.8060207@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:14:00 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" References: <025E3A4E-2EE8-4490-A0AD-A068B0EBCDB9@shire.net> In-Reply-To: <025E3A4E-2EE8-4490-A0AD-A068B0EBCDB9@shire.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: no SMP without ACPI? (amd64) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 09:14:03 -0000 Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > > On Sep 5, 2007, at 3:07 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Kris Kennaway >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 1:57 AM >>> To: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC >>> Cc: User Questions >>> Subject: Re: no SMP without ACPI? (amd64) >>> >> >>> Note that this may well be hardware related: without acpi you are only >>> using one CPU, etc, so if one of the others is bad it will only fail >>> when you have ACPI enabled -- even if ACPI itself is not to blame. >>> >> >> Easily testable by running that Other Operating system on the thing >> which I would have expected Chad to have done. > > Sorry to be MIA for the last day. > > No, I did not test it with that OS which shall not be named. However, I > did attempt to install Sol10 on it. Sol10 also relies on ACPI btw. > Anyway, the same error happened a good way through the installation -- > it rebooted itself during the high IO of installing the system onto the > system array. Sol10 uses a 32bit kernel for the installation and I > think, but am not sure, that it only activates 1 CPU core. Then something is wrong with your hardware. Sorry. Kris