Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:34:37 -0800
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
To:        Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org>, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>, Don Lewis <truckman@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, fjwcash@gmail.com
Subject:   Re: ipwf dummynet vs. kernel NAT and firewall rules
Message-ID:  <56E1DA5D.6060006@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <1457638541.445340.545617522.5FF4A6BE@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References:  <201603092302.u29N2IYm012240@gw.catspoiler.org> <20160310165323.U61428@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <1457638541.445340.545617522.5FF4A6BE@webmail.messagingengine.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On 10/03/2016 11:35 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016, at 00:53, Ian Smith wrote:
>> On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 15:02:18 -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
>>   > On  9 Mar, Don Lewis wrote:
>>   > > On  9 Mar, Don Lewis wrote:
>>   > >> On  9 Mar, Don Lewis wrote:
>>   > >>> On  9 Mar, Freddie Cash wrote:
>>   > >>>>
>>   > >>>> ?Do you have the sysctl net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass set to 0 or 1?
>>   > >>>
>>   > >>> Aha, I've got it set to 1.
>>
>> I observe that in 99 cases out of 100, the default of 1 is undesired,
>> but it's too late to do anything but advise people - thanks Freddie!
>>
> Is there any reason why we shouldn't just change the default for
> 11-RELEASE?

yeah people will kill you.
firewalls don't get rewritten by mergemaster.
>
>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56E1DA5D.6060006>