From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 3 01:03:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F9E16B788; Sun, 3 Jul 2005 01:02:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ps@mu.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7416744CFE; Sun, 3 Jul 2005 00:54:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ps@mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1573B5DA5C; Sat, 2 Jul 2005 17:07:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: ps@mu.org Delivered-To: ps@mu.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [216.136.204.119]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295485C966 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 12:58:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860F8577AB; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 20:58:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9FD16A4D7; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 20:58:42 +0000 (GMT) Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA7516A4CE; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 20:58:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from risky.niblet.co.uk (risky.niblet.co.uk [80.177.236.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF3CB43D41; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 20:58:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@genesi.co.uk) Received: from sakura.niblet.co.uk ([80.177.236.68] helo=sakura) by risky.niblet.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1CPogp-0002Vp-Ur; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 20:58:39 +0000 From: "Matt Sealey" To: "Julian Elischer" , "Karim Fodil-Lemelin" Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 In-Reply-To: <418A9699.6050603@elischer.org> Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Errors-To: owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on elvis.mu.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.0 X-Spam-Level: Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Andre Oppermann , mallman@icir.org Subject: RE: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 01:03:21 -0000 X-Original-Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 20:58:19 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 01:03:21 -0000 His product looks like it's the the product mentioned in the original post by the original poster; http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=284774+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2004/freebsd-net/20041024.freebsd-net QUOTE: However something like T/TCP is certainly useful and I know of one special purpose application using it (Web Proxy Server/Client for high-delay Satellite connections). As long as they can live with FreeBSD 5.3 I don't think it causes a problem whatsoever does it? -- Matt Sealey Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Julian Elischer > Sent: 04 November 2004 20:53 > To: Karim Fodil-Lemelin > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org; freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Andre Oppermann; > mallman@icir.org > Subject: Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler > > > > > Karim Fodil-Lemelin wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am jumping in here, was too busy to read the list for the last 2 > > weeks, so please excuse my intrusion. We are using T/TCP in our > > product line and are very happy with the performance gain. Could you > > tell me what is the rational for removing T/TCP > > (security/performances/code complexity, etc ..) from FreeBSD? > > > > Again, sorry for being a bit off topic here. > > > what a pitty you didn't notice while it was under discussion: :-( > > > We couldn't find anyone using it... > > what is your product? > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"