Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 08 Sep 2004 10:02:46 -0500
From:      Guy Helmer <ghelmer@palisadesys.com>
To:        Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org>
Cc:        tcpdump-workers@tcpdump.org
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] Add ioctl to disable bpf timestamping
Message-ID:  <413F1F16.5050303@palisadesys.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040908092624.GD793@empiric.icir.org>
References:  <20040908092624.GD793@empiric.icir.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce M Simpson wrote:

>Here's a patch against 5.3 to add a per-instance switch which allows
>the user to specify if captured packets should be timestamped (and,
>if so, whether microtime() or the faster but less accurate
>getmicrotime() call should be used).
>  
>
I like the idea (I've been using a hack to call getmicrotime() in bpf in 
my own kernels), but I wonder if it would be better as a sysctl?  Then 
it wouldn't require changes to libpcap and/or tcpdump, and would work 
with any application.

Thanks,
Guy

-- 
Guy Helmer, Ph.D., Principal System Architect, Palisade Systems, Inc.
ghelmer@palisadesys.com
ghelmer@freebsd.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?413F1F16.5050303>