Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:03:32 -0500 From: "Scot Hetzel" <swhetzel@gmail.com> To: "Hajimu UMEMOTO" <ume@freebsd.org> Cc: krion@freebsd.org, Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: request add db45/db46 support to mail/exim port Message-ID: <790a9fff0708111103y2c178125iacc5d4ec1395bb07@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <yge1weadkp7.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> References: <70f41ba20708110931i4262c224kd0479290616c4fa8@mail.gmail.com> <46BDEA06.9030503@delphij.net> <70f41ba20708111013g296134ecw57bf152846718e91@mail.gmail.com> <790a9fff0708111037m1d25e164ma760a286f6d70cb8@mail.gmail.com> <yge1weadkp7.wl%ume@mahoroba.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/11/07, Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hi, > > >>>>> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:37:18 -0500 > >>>>> "Scot Hetzel" <swhetzel@gmail.com> said: > > swhetzel> Here's the correct code for BDB detection: > > swhetzel> USE_BDB= 40+ > > Why do you specify USE_BDB as 40+, explicitly? Since, it is defined > as 41+ in bsd.database.mk, I believe USE_BDB=yes is enough. > I believe when I made the change to bsd.database.mk, and then patched all of the BDB using ports, I had put the lowest version that the port supported into USE_BDB. USE_BDB=yes would also work and allow the port to show a dependancy on the default BDB version instead of the lowest BDB version. Also, INVALID_BDB_VER takes care of excluding BDB versions that the port doesn't work with. Scot -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?790a9fff0708111103y2c178125iacc5d4ec1395bb07>