From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 11 18:03:34 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6DF216A417 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:03:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 160BE13C4A7 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:03:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b27so1152891fka for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:03:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GswgiWBaiUQFX9Ga+6IQS//l8Av8lUPZ7zGy/VZ+HEn3pXmnWLRM4DRls04mTdw+ObuAHmLj20ecn5jd0wGE7M/Ml3vZuzjh9f1vPTy+05o5dwiXQKk4LLwHiXyBZ5/qUx15Mq502DAltfnx++4XhNG8L+RIFezgDhTKuFMxQFE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Z1cQomJABj5plNy9hf9nJoHAbInDvEQLjmIsBEzGOMvXj1OaUNRsw9IQD/dfbuslk+IZhBAS7Jiekws3U+rZVE7BuTmMSazpQ8UQycTmwBCS2OYONUyRf9US2wabgyebw7xX12jYxw9h/I7DSU7JzRJhuDh0H76G99oR5MqWoLc= Received: by 10.86.100.7 with SMTP id x7mr2982402fgb.1186855412766; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:03:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.59.6 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:03:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <790a9fff0708111103y2c178125iacc5d4ec1395bb07@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:03:32 -0500 From: "Scot Hetzel" To: "Hajimu UMEMOTO" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <70f41ba20708110931i4262c224kd0479290616c4fa8@mail.gmail.com> <46BDEA06.9030503@delphij.net> <70f41ba20708111013g296134ecw57bf152846718e91@mail.gmail.com> <790a9fff0708111037m1d25e164ma760a286f6d70cb8@mail.gmail.com> Cc: krion@freebsd.org, Xin LI , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: request add db45/db46 support to mail/exim port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:03:34 -0000 On 8/11/07, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > > >>>>> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:37:18 -0500 > >>>>> "Scot Hetzel" said: > > swhetzel> Here's the correct code for BDB detection: > > swhetzel> USE_BDB= 40+ > > Why do you specify USE_BDB as 40+, explicitly? Since, it is defined > as 41+ in bsd.database.mk, I believe USE_BDB=yes is enough. > I believe when I made the change to bsd.database.mk, and then patched all of the BDB using ports, I had put the lowest version that the port supported into USE_BDB. USE_BDB=yes would also work and allow the port to show a dependancy on the default BDB version instead of the lowest BDB version. Also, INVALID_BDB_VER takes care of excluding BDB versions that the port doesn't work with. Scot -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.