From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 9 19:16:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51CBE16A400; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 19:16:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4057F13C480; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 19:16:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29661A4D8F; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 12:16:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD875129D; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 15:16:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 852D3C214; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 15:16:36 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 15:16:36 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Daniel Eischen Message-ID: <20070609191636.GA52501@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <466A5CA2.8010301@steelerubber.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Walter Vaughan , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Threading breaking FreeBSD Foundation's Java? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 19:16:37 -0000 On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 08:18:38AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Walter Vaughan wrote: > > >On dual quad core Intel box with 8 gig ram running AMD64. > >FreeBSD-Current from about a week ago and a few hours ago > >SCHED_ULE > > > >We have been flexing our Java based ERP on the box and all of a sudden we > >have problems when we had code to find printers. > > > >I found some example code that we put into the project that we think was > >the problem and when I compiled and ran an example class I got... > > > >Fatal error 'Exceeded maximum lock level' at line 201 in file > >/usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_rtld.c (errno = 0) > > > >about a hundred times and then it > > You probably need to wait for compat6x support Or test the proposed port so that we have increased confidence that it actually does what it is supposed to ;-) Kris