Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 12 Aug 2007 03:22:41 +0900
From:      Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org>
To:        "Scot Hetzel" <swhetzel@gmail.com>
Cc:        krion@freebsd.org, Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: request add db45/db46 support to mail/exim port
Message-ID:  <ygezm0yc4ni.wl%ume@mahoroba.org>
In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0708111103y2c178125iacc5d4ec1395bb07@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <70f41ba20708110931i4262c224kd0479290616c4fa8@mail.gmail.com> <46BDEA06.9030503@delphij.net> <70f41ba20708111013g296134ecw57bf152846718e91@mail.gmail.com> <790a9fff0708111037m1d25e164ma760a286f6d70cb8@mail.gmail.com> <yge1weadkp7.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> <790a9fff0708111103y2c178125iacc5d4ec1395bb07@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Hi,

>>>>> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:03:32 -0500
>>>>> "Scot Hetzel" <swhetzel@gmail.com> said:

swhetzel> I believe when I made the change to bsd.database.mk, and then patched
swhetzel> all of the BDB using ports, I had put the lowest version that the port
swhetzel>  supported into USE_BDB.

swhetzel> USE_BDB=yes would also work and allow the port to show a dependancy on
swhetzel> the default BDB version instead of the lowest BDB version.  Also,
swhetzel> INVALID_BDB_VER takes care of excluding BDB versions that the port
swhetzel> doesn't work with.

Yes, it is same as my understanding.  So, I think a user doesn't
specify WITH_BSD_VER explicitly, exim will use db40, while other ports
which use bsd.database.mk use db41.

Sincerely,

--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@mahoroba.org  ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ygezm0yc4ni.wl%ume>