From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Sep 16 23:35:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D62037B423; Sat, 16 Sep 2000 23:35:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id XAA34213; Sat, 16 Sep 2000 23:35:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 23:35:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Greg Lehey Cc: Chip , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , Mark Ovens , Alfred Perlstein , Roland Jesse , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OS poll at linuxtoday.com In-Reply-To: <20000917152156.B67912@wantadilla.lemis.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 17 Sep 2000, Greg Lehey wrote: > You're missing the point. The numbers were increasing at the rate of > hundreds a second. That can only come from scripts, and I know that > people on both sides were running scripts. It's a kind of primitive > performance measurement. It's not really a performance measurement either, since the BSD votes were being blocked. It's not a big deal since it was stated up front that it was going to be biased. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message