Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Jan 2014 12:42:26 +0000
From:      krad <kraduk@gmail.com>
To:        Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
Cc:        "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD and Linux shared installation
Message-ID:  <CALfReye1NvQPQEPyM4EEwiVAy29k7A1HcuQTGPO755PDAXRn1w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140121120252.442c19cf.freebsd@edvax.de>
References:  <mailman.4159.1390281281.1397.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> <20140121172736.A25136@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <CA+g+Bvg18ef9jE5xoKhTtQgh_gAPwg6Qd+m2kpgxfa8ZG0K28Q@mail.gmail.com> <20140121193035.K25136@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <CA+g+Bvhfvp4BBTTZd9VU0vppqhQ8Cak=eJGzA4Q23_DLmv+bZA@mail.gmail.com> <CALfReyc_t2dv8p+ZrQnSagYsOwbafQE9B6jAXG5esCo0yjTavA@mail.gmail.com> <20140121120252.442c19cf.freebsd@edvax.de>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
ifs its only for small stuff would fat32 not be good enough. Linux and BSD
are ok with with, even if it is a bit ugly


On 21 January 2014 11:02, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> wrote:

> On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 10:31:52 +0000, krad wrote:
> > if you want data exchange, you might be better going for nfs or cifs
> rather
> > than trying to keep it on disk. All of the issues with fs support then go
> > away, and you can keep each os install atomic
>
> If I would need this for larger amounts of data, NFS would definitely
> be my choice. I already _know_ that it works because I have tried it
> in the past. But the requirement is "network-less", and only for
> small amounts of data, just in case I want to access something from
> all installed operating systems, or want something created on one
> OS make accessible on the other OS. It's not even about a shared
> home directory. Also it's not about simultaneous access, because
> only one OS will run at a time.
>
> The primary intention is that it should be r/w from all systems
> with the simplest means possible. I'm not sure in how far Linux
> supports UFS (either as a partition inside a slice, or as a GPT
> partition, or as a "slice on its own"), that's why I thought the
> best choice would be the lowest Linux file system (ext2), because
> FreeBSD can read and write this with OS tools (fuse not required).
> So the "means of sharing or transfer" can be kept on the same
> disk (installed in the laptop) and does not require something
> specific. It's really not meant for big amounts of data, it's
> a "just in case" concept.
>
>
>
> --
> Polytropon
> Magdeburg, Germany
> Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
> Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALfReye1NvQPQEPyM4EEwiVAy29k7A1HcuQTGPO755PDAXRn1w>