Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:53:02 +0200 From: Stefan Farfeleder <stefanf@FreeBSD.org> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include Makefile Message-ID: <20050914165300.GG59453@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> In-Reply-To: <154E8DB1-C941-4477-9FB7-BD373DC11898@xcllnt.net> References: <200509140901.j8E916mL044612@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050914095217.GC59453@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> <154E8DB1-C941-4477-9FB7-BD373DC11898@xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:30:26AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Sep 14, 2005, at 2:52 AM, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: > > >> Back out 1.247. On ia64 <osreldate.h> is included from > >>assembler source, > >> the prototype broke buildword. > > > >I waver between guarding the prototype with #ifndef __ASSEMBLER__ and > >moving it to another header, eg. <unistd.h>. Opinions? > > I would go with #ifndef __ASSEMBLER__. I think the prototype is > essentially in the right header. I did test your patch and it does > the trick... That would require fixing xorg-server's usage of the header too. I don't know how difficult this is. Stefan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050914165300.GG59453>