From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 14:24:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B237716A41F for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:24:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1AE43D48 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:24:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j89EO075042935; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 09:24:00 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 09:24:00 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Chantal Rosmuller Message-ID: <20050909142359.GD84582@dan.emsphone.com> References: <4320494D.6030503@antenna.nl> <200509082309.43229.yuanjue122@gmail.com> <20050908173948.GE49084@xor.obsecurity.org> <200509090813.06887.yuanjue122@gmail.com> <4321328C.6090306@antenna.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4321328C.6090306@antenna.nl> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Cc: Kris Kennaway , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question about zlib security patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 14:24:03 -0000 In the last episode (Sep 09), Chantal Rosmuller said: > Thanks everyone for the advice, I installed the sources and applied > the patch, so I guess I took care of the zlib security issue The > clamav error remained though but someone at the qmail rocks > mailinglist suggested that clamav cannot see that zlib is patched so > it is safe to ignore the error. To be on the safe side I will post > the question about the error on the clamav mailing list. Yes, clamav only checks the version number in the header; it doesn't actually test the bug. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com