From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 2 15:45:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE2C16A4CE for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:45:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76C543D1D for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:45:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111396530A; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 23:45:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 31169-04-3; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 23:45:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from saboteur.dek.spc.org (82-147-17-88.dsl.uk.rapidplay.com [82.147.17.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F31A6520E; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 23:45:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: by saboteur.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BB64918; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 23:45:52 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 23:45:52 +0000 From: Bruce M Simpson To: Darren Reed Message-ID: <20040302234552.GC8716@saboteur.dek.spc.org> Mail-Followup-To: Darren Reed , freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <20040302211030.GJ7115@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <200403022324.i22NOQ7B015446@caligula.anu.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403022324.i22NOQ7B015446@caligula.anu.edu.au> cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Force mountd(8) to a specified port. X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 23:45:55 -0000 On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 10:24:25AM +1100, Darren Reed wrote: > I'm confused by your first paragraph...the primary purpose of a patch > like this would be, I imagine, to support being able to write filter > rules for your firewall with a specific port defined rather than have > to determine it after rpcbind & mountd have started. Exactamundo! BMS