Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 03:46:24 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> Cc: Nathan Aherne <nathan@reddog.com.au>, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel NAT issues Message-ID: <20151119032200.T27669@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <564C8879.8070307@freebsd.org> References: <94B91F98-DE01-4A10-8AB5-4193FE11AF3F@reddog.com.au> <20151013142301.B67283@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <C1C25100-FBD4-42F4-94F7-965B270D927F@reddog.com.au> <20151014232026.S15983@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <9908EC22-344F-4D0B-8930-7D2C70B084A1@reddog.com.au> <32DEEFB3-E41F-40CD-8E1A-520FB261C572@reddog.com.au> <564C8879.8070307@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:17:29 +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 11/18/15 8:40 AM, Nathan Aherne wrote: > > For some reason hairpin (loopback nat or nat reflection) does not seem to > > be working, which is why I chose IPFW in the first place. > it would be good to see a diagram of what this actually means. Anything like ? http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB24639&actp=search Was this so one jail can only access service/s provided by other jail/s, both/all with internal NAT'd addresses, by using only the public address and port of the 'router', which IIRC this is a single system with jails? If so, what sort of routing is setup on both host and jails? (blindfolded, no idea where I've pinned the donkey's tail :) cheers, Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151119032200.T27669>