Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 22:41:54 -0500 From: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fw: Proposed new sysctl MIB nodes Message-ID: <20030224224154.F61907@espresso.bsdmike.org> In-Reply-To: <20030225021234.GA1835@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net>; from marcel@xcllnt.net on Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 06:12:34PM -0800 References: <20030224.174742.21056478.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030225005912.GA1583@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> <p05200f1eba807c5b0e1d@[128.113.24.47]> <20030225021234.GA1835@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> writes: > Also, why a sysctl to get the total amount of memory in the box. > Isn't getrlimit a much better approach to tune process behaviour? Good point, a process may also have resource limits, so the system memory is almost irrelevant. Too bad we don't support the standardized RLIMIT_AS option for getrlimit(). Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030224224154.F61907>