From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 31 13:27:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1F816A41F; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:27:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from is@rambler-co.ru) Received: from yam.park.rambler.ru (yam.park.rambler.ru [81.19.64.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A3A43D4C; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:27:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from is@rambler-co.ru) Received: from is.park.rambler.ru (is.park.rambler.ru [81.19.64.102]) by yam.park.rambler.ru (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9VDQuPd087067; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 16:26:56 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from is@rambler-co.ru) Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 16:26:56 +0300 (MSK) From: Igor Sysoev X-X-Sender: is@is.park.rambler.ru To: Maxim Konovalov In-Reply-To: <20051031144056.A92356@mp2.macomnet.net> Message-ID: <20051031162438.I554@is.park.rambler.ru> References: <2b22951e0510302128q571a3c1se111262e88ae19bb@mail.gmail.com> <20051031144056.A92356@mp2.macomnet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Edwin Groothuis , "Cai, Quanqing" , Uwe Doering , bug-followup@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/67919: Why nobody take serious to fix this bug? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:27:05 -0000 On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, 21:28-0800, Cai, Quanqing wrote: > >> Today I happened to read this message on freebsd-stable: >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-October/019086.html >> >> After I read all messages and related links, I feel so frustrating, >> why nobody take serious to fix this bug even we have a patch for it? >> I can repeat this bug on 7.0-CURRENT and 6.0-RC1 easily as a normal >> user! System goes no response so I have to power cycle it. The patch >> made by Uwe Doering actually works well. This bug looks like a >> security hole to me:( If you guys don't like this patch, please give >> out a reason and come out a better patch or solution. > > I was told the patch is incorrect. It works in certain cases but > incorrect in general. Why is it incorrect ? I'm using it for year. Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru/en/