From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 13 15:06:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91271106564A for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:06:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530CF8FC1A for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:06:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 13 Dec 2008 10:06:40 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id PHX23244; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:06:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 13 Dec 2008 10:06:40 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18755.53118.854987.966113@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:06:38 -0500 To: Michel Talon In-Reply-To: <20081213143200.GA5026@lpthe.jussieu.fr> References: <20081213143200.GA5026@lpthe.jussieu.fr> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:06:40 -0000 Michel Talon writes: > As you suggest, first, discussions about the direction FreeBSD > should go are eminently FreeBSD related, Technical note: questions@ may be an appropriate forum for general discussion; however, as things progress to the technical it becomes more appropriate for either hackers@ or arch@. Robert Huff