Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Sep 2013 12:10:13 +0100
From:      krad <kraduk@gmail.com>
To:        "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steve@sohara.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, aurfalien <aurfalien@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: Proper way to share ZFS via NFS
Message-ID:  <CALfReyfONwS67JO540EMxnLFutXrt=N_xs49bi2GmV%2BLRCoPEw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130909152239.05eff4e8daf98d0659636dec@sohara.org>
References:  <DFD7FF97-6F1F-40D9-AF6D-C151E216779A@gmail.com> <20130909152239.05eff4e8daf98d0659636dec@sohara.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
which is why you shouldnt use /etc/exports for zfs datasets. Just because
you can do something doesn't mean you should eg dancing down the motorway
at night in dark clothing is never a good idea, no matter how confident you
are in your skills.


On 9 September 2013 15:22, Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:43:03 -0700
> aurfalien <aurfalien@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Wondering whats the correct way to share ZFS, /etc/exports or via zfs
> > commands which alter /etc/zfs/exports?
>
>         As far as I can see both work just fine. The first has the benefit
> that it puts your ZFS exports in the standard place for exports and won't
> need fiddling with if you decide that you want to move one of them to some
> other filesystem. The second has the benefit that it integrates better with
> the ZFS tools.
>
>         The one thing you don't want to do is put the same export in both.
> --
> Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALfReyfONwS67JO540EMxnLFutXrt=N_xs49bi2GmV%2BLRCoPEw>