Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 12:25:02 -0800 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org> To: Dennis <dennis@etinc.com> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2. Message-ID: <200103312025.f2VKP2Q76882@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.0.20010331151458.0220ab10@mail.etinc.com> References: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E452205FD9AD0@l04.research.kpn.com> <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E452205FD9AD0@l04.research.kpn.com> <5.0.0.25.0.20010331151458.0220ab10@mail.etinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==_Exmh_-1920427702P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii [trying to move this off -hackers] If memory serves me right, Dennis wrote: > At 02:18 PM 03/31/2001, David O'Brien wrote: > >On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 08:49:55PM +0100, Koster, K.J. wrote: > > > Its not a "proprietary tree". I dont have time to clean it up > > > and submit patches. > > > >But you do seem to have time to keep arguing with people??? > >I'm sure you'll have time to bitch again if 4.4 doesn't meet your needs > >because you didn't submit some patch you needed. > > Only because the same morons (like yourself) continue ad infinitum to post > your useless comments publicly. As they say, it takes two to tango. About ten messages ago you asked if someone could just let this thread die. Why don't you take the lead on this and be that person? I'm asking nicely and sincerely. That ought to count for something. Thanks, Bruce. --==_Exmh_-1920427702P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 iD8DBQE6xj0e2MoxcVugUsMRAi7EAJ4tUXNnfivk054GgOIxydLEHQLQfQCfVYta oGxFkVwyrJ9NJjKO160WYEU= =OJIF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-1920427702P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103312025.f2VKP2Q76882>