From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 15 06:48:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD0616A412 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 06:48:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ke.han@redstarling.com) Received: from smtp105.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp105.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.52.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2545C43D77 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 06:48:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ke.han@redstarling.com) Received: (qmail 35441 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2006 06:48:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.20?) (ke.han@redstarling.com@218.79.215.253 with plain) by smtp105.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Sep 2006 06:48:04 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions Questions list From: ke han Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:48:00 +0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: portsdb -Uu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 06:48:10 -0000 I am using portsnap fetch portsnap update to sync my ports tree on FreeBSd 6.1...it seems it maintains an index when I run update. I am used to using: portsversion and portsupdate to upgrade ports...in this method I have also used portsdb -Uu to rebuild an index anytime prior to running these commands...yes portsdb takes a while and I've always wondered if this is necessary prior to running any of these commands.. So my question is: Is the index being maintained by portsnap the same or a replacement to that used by portupgrade? Do I have to maintain both sets of indexes in order to use portsupdate?? What do other people do? thanks, ke han