Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 12:09:05 -0500 From: "Jack L. Stone" <jacks@sage-american.com> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>, Ludo Koren <lk@tempest.sk> Cc: ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: limiting bandwith Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20040413120905.01f334c8@10.0.0.15> In-Reply-To: <20040413091734.A98975@xorpc.icir.org> References: <200404131506.i3DF6G20031890@lk106.tempest.sk> <200404131506.i3DF6G20031890@lk106.tempest.sk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
TopPost: Hi, Luigi & List: Pardon me for tagging along on this thread, but my question is somewhat related. Being a newbie to using dummynet, I haven't yet figured how to chose & apply the proper "weight" which ranges from 1-100. The man pages are very brief on this and I haven't seen anything else in my searches. Any tips appreciated.... At 09:17 AM 4.13.2004 -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote: >i think it is pilot error. > >Be warned that dynamic rules only match addresses and ports, >so once a rule is installed it will match traffic both >in and out. >If you want to select on other attributes you have to do >it before you hit any keep-state or check-state rule. > >I don't know if it matches recent reports about dummynet on 5.2.1 >giving half the bandwidth, but i just checked locally and it >does work as expected -- the bandwidth is correct (with a correct >ipfw config, that is :) > > cheers > luigi > Best regards, Jack L. Stone, Administrator Sage American http://www.sage-american.com jacks@sage-american.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.5.32.20040413120905.01f334c8>