Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 6 Sep 2006 17:01:41 -0700
From:      Gary Kline <kline@sage.thought.org>
To:        Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
Cc:        Gary Kline <kline@sage.thought.org>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: How to fix init -> /etc/ttys?
Message-ID:  <20060907000141.GA36761@thought.org>
In-Reply-To: <44FF3404.2040405@infracaninophile.co.uk>
References:  <20060906200225.GA35990@thought.org> <44FF3404.2040405@infracaninophile.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:48:04PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Gary Kline wrote:
> > 	Anybody know why getty is having such a bear of a time finding
> > 	a tty?  I Can't even get in.  I'm at 6.1 and logged in 
> > 	single-usr and have /usr mounted on /dev.  Because X expects
> > 	to find /usr/lib/Y in /usr I csn't use anything very complex;
> > 	can't poke around....
> > 
> > 	I very rarely touch /etc/ttys; so why is 6.1 having this 
> > 	tantrum??  I'm lost ....
> 
> Because getty needs access to the /dev/tty* devices in order to function?
> 
> /dev is a truly bizarre choice of mountpoint.   Why not use /mnt, which is
> there solely to provide a convenient place to mount stuff?  Or -- and this
> is a radical idea, I know -- why not mount the /usr filesystem on /usr?
> 

	WEll, it turns out that my old /etc/fstab was overwritten by
	my backup, and I had added a /var slice this time.  (The drive 
	is only a couple years old (200G), the box is 61 months old
	(was homebrew) and I cheaped out with a 40G).  

	Yes, I did wind up fsck'ing everything and mounting /usr on
	/usr:: then major progress, thank you.

	Remaining mystery is those "acpi: write failure on 0x70" 
	or whatever.  I googled around, and now that I have *grep-powers*
	I've grep'd in /boot and have some clues.  If you have spot-on
	advise, Matthew, please do share.

	<SOAPBOX>
	Anyway, this is to the entire list:  A week or so ago
	I loaned my 5.3 set to a non-geek friend who had occasionally
	been using RH.  He brought the box of discs back and said it
	was too hard to install; that RH had a much easier installation
	process.  True.  So I gave him my old Ubuntu boot disk.  He's
	happy with it.  ---I realize how much smaller the FBSD hacker
	base is.... Still,  having a GUI-ish intro makes sense in 
	gaining new converts.  I'm still here  because this Berkeley
	distro really *is* solid.  One fatal trap in 11 years I
	can handle.
	< SOAPBOX>

	gary


> 



-- 
   Gary Kline     kline@thought.org   www.thought.org     Public service Unix




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060907000141.GA36761>