From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 9 08:28:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C66B106564A for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 08:28:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johans@stack.nl) Received: from mx1.stack.nl (relay02.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF08E8FC19 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 08:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mx1.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 27D803592EC; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:28:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: scanner01.stack.nl 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on scanner01.stack.nl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Relay-Country: _RELAYCOUNTRY_ Received: from mud.stack.nl (mud.stack.nl [131.155.141.70]) by mx1.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E5D358C63; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:27:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mud.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 801) id 9A9199651E; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:27:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:27:59 +0200 From: Johan van Selst To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20120709082759.GA46487@mud.stack.nl> References: <4FFA3A36.9050809@dougbarton.us> <20120709073419.GA37825@mud.stack.nl> <4FFA8A8A.7040205@dougbarton.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FFA8A8A.7040205@dougbarton.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: FreeBSD ports list Subject: Re: texi2html problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 08:28:07 -0000 --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Doug Barton wrote: > >> It would also be useful if you could make real options out of > >> what you have in the file already. > > Not sure what you mean by this: the options seem real enough. > make config > ===> No options to configure The only relevant options are DOCS and NLS; they were never included in OPTIONS in the past (before I adopted this port). And indeed, many ports don't include DOCS and NLS in their OPTIONS today. My understanding is that most people who want to tweak these specific settings use a system-wide setting anyway. Is there some general policy on whether OPTIONS_DEFINE should be set for DOCS and NLS as well? Regards, Johan --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF4EAREIAAYFAk/6lg8ACgkQAEpMHW8nCPTb+AEApym+HSR0pIDuqldrkjLroCRG dq3seFe7e7Tl/yKd6z8BAK8izyCRDrMAsPo8mhcPTrMopdvWZLak/N6BH3u8qcMS =iSKN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5--