Date: Sun, 1 Nov 1998 16:47:32 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> To: Dom Mitchell <dom@myrddin.demon.co.uk> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Shells for you and shells for me Message-ID: <19981101164732.A22829@nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <E0zZEYK-000047-00.qmail@myrddin.demon.co.uk>; from Dom Mitchell on Fri, Oct 30, 1998 at 01:25:20PM %2B0000 References: <3633C8F8.EF8E14D5@null.net> <Pine.BSF.4.05.9810252016090.375-100000@picnic.mat.net> <19981026125133.A2717@netmonger.net> <19981029012621.A26396@nuxi.com> <E0zZEYK-000047-00.qmail@myrddin.demon.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 30, 1998 at 01:25:20PM +0000, Dom Mitchell wrote: > To be frank, I think that pdksh is definitely something that we should > be looking at for that reason alone. If we import it into the tree > and leave it installed as /bin/ksh, then people can test it at their > leisure to see if it is worth replacing /bin/sh, and we also gain a > ksh. It's a good situation. This sounds like a good compromise. Unless there is serious objections, I'll look into doing this. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.ucdavis.edu -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981101164732.A22829>