From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 10 08:20:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E6837B407 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 08:20:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.speakeasy.net (mail11.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E756143FA3 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 08:20:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 19920 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2003 15:20:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender )encrypted SMTP for ; 10 Apr 2003 15:20:03 -0000 Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h3AFJvOv052804; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:19:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.4 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20030409235243.GI30960@elvis.mu.org> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:19:57 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Alfred Perlstein cc: Pawel Jakub Dawidek cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Robert Watson cc: Nate Lawson cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Mike Barcroft Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/killall killall.1 killall.c src/usr.sbin Makefile src/usr.sbin/jail jail.8 jail.c src/usr.sbin/jexec Makefile jexec.8 jexec.c src/usr.sbin/jls Makefile jls.8 jls.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 15:20:06 -0000 On 09-Apr-2003 Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Robert Watson [030409 16:48] wrote: >> >> On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, Nate Lawson wrote: >> >> > On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >> > > >> > > And what kind of path seperator is '.'? >> > >> > Exactly. What you're describing would be better implemented as a >> > pseudo-fs layer. In fact, that would remove the need for separate j* >> > utilities. >> >> I thought we were trying to get away from synthetic file systems with >> terrible security properties. In fact, we specifically toasted procfs >> because it behaved so badly; kernfs went down the tubes because the >> semantic match was very poor, and sysctl is in. > > Whatever, path components should be path components. You mean like this? > sysctl -N net.inet.tcp.syncache net.inet.tcp.syncache.bucketlimit net.inet.tcp.syncache.cachelimit net.inet.tcp.syncache.count net.inet.tcp.syncache.hashsize net.inet.tcp.syncache.rexmtlimit -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/