From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 00:08:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F92216A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:08:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from khaled.abu@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F359A43D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:08:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from khaled.abu@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so702662wri for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:08:17 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FPgfoOdCrwmNSZmm6QfB437ZnjLRcfSVd078Af2lAQ2bCQRjhdORYo6t5bO5duAOxBX3NTi2p7Lw18gMyn111+bBnl6i+VYZlKfCEvy0SfpfM+ervWBv5dQxwaVtN9qhdUH+izsIFoiKa+dS+sgEgnQKG5kHl1fiih56eseQAoU= Received: by 10.54.37.72 with SMTP id k72mr1796366wrk; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:08:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.66.16 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:08:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:08:17 +0300 From: Abu Khaled To: Jack Raats In-Reply-To: <000e01c58f6b$20bc9670$9800000a@jara2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <000e01c58f6b$20bc9670$9800000a@jara2> Cc: FreeBSD Stable , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trouble with PHP4-extensions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Abu Khaled List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:08:18 -0000 On 7/23/05, Jack Raats wrote: > I had installed Apache, PHP4.40 and imap on a FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE server. = It worked OK. I had to recompile IMAP and after this apache refuses to star= t. I have to recompile the php4-imap part of php. >=20 > How to do this? > Deinstall php4 completely and then reinstall it > or > Can i use the extensions to recompile only a part? >=20 > Met vriendelijke groeten > Jack Raats Why don't you use sysutils/portmanager or sysutils/portupgrade in the ports directory. These utilities do a good job at solving such problems and you might have other php4-extensions that need updating. --=20 Regards. Abu Khaled From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 00:11:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6A516A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:11:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from greg@grokking.org) Received: from herbert.sohotech.ca (herbert.sohotech.ca [206.116.63.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A8A43D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:11:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from greg@grokking.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by herbert.sohotech.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2851893F8 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:11:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from herbert.sohotech.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (herbert.sohotech.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02666-01 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:11:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.11.2] (niven.sohotech.ca [192.168.11.2]) by herbert.sohotech.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AC7175C4A for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:11:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42E2DCAC.3060700@grokking.org> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:11:24 -0700 From: Greg Maruszeczka User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200507231237.44829.bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net> In-Reply-To: <200507231237.44829.bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sohotech.ca Subject: [OT Re: SPAM Problem] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:11:29 -0000 Aaron Siegel wrote: > Hello > > This message is off topic but I was not sure were else I can go to get help > with my problem. For the past week I have been receiving messages from > various mail servers which have bounced messages I have not sent but have my > email address as the originator of the bounced message. I believe there are > some SPAMers using my email address on their SPAM. I would really like to > avoid changing my domain name. Has anyone experienced this problem? Is there > something I can do? > It's probably "blowback" resulting from the activities of worm-infected windows hosts. Someone you correspond with got infected and the worm subsequently propagated itself by picking your name from their address book and inserting it into the from: header of the message carrying the worm. Then, badly configured MTAs send "helpful" NDRs to the "sender" informing them that they're messages couldn't be delivered Pretty routine, really. G From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 00:14:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4E216A41F; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:14:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu (server.t-hosting.hu [217.20.133.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C04B343D48; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:14:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854F3997928; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:14:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.t-hosting.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 86626-01; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:14:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [80.98.156.20] (catv-50629c14.catv.broadband.hu [80.98.156.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10194997561; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:14:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E2DD50.4090304@t-hosting.hu> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:14:08 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jack Raats References: <000e01c58f6b$20bc9670$9800000a@jara2> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Cc: FreeBSD Stable , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trouble with PHP4-extensions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:14:21 -0000 On 7/23/05, Jack Raats wrote: >I had installed Apache, PHP4.40 and imap on a FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE server. It worked OK. I had to recompile IMAP and after this apache refuses to start. I have to recompile the php4-imap part of php. > >How to do this? >Deinstall php4 completely and then reinstall it >or >Can i use the extensions to recompile only a part? > >Met vriendelijke groeten >Jack Raats > Just delete only php4-imap with pkg_delete, then mkdir to /usr/ports/lang/php4-extensions and make config. Make only imap part selected and make FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=YES install. Cheers, Gábor Kövesdán From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 00:35:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A8016A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:35:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hornetmadness@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B9C43D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:35:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hornetmadness@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 34so73510rns for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:35:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aSSnZDlGi5SL5sn3NLZorxb4lB/4FS38hswkD37QUuOsfwxefiARdxa1KxvJd8tRGzF9uEN3JcuOYL/acHrkGVMe6PB1V3Hc81HRvevbIECd8J3r5/s2vAwcNyFTTEAa6lRMbz6EtPLN8YOxQVObN+1jVcFFUaiAma8r0wjr3Bg= Received: by 10.38.103.16 with SMTP id a16mr72509rnc; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:35:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.8.44 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:35:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 20:35:34 -0400 From: Hornet To: Greg Maruszeczka In-Reply-To: <42E2DCAC.3060700@grokking.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200507231237.44829.bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net> <42E2DCAC.3060700@grokking.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [OT Re: SPAM Problem] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Hornet List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:35:35 -0000 On 7/23/05, Greg Maruszeczka wrote: > Aaron Siegel wrote: > > Hello > > > > This message is off topic but I was not sure were else I can go to get = help > > with my problem. For the past week I have been receiving messages from > > various mail servers which have bounced messages I have not sent but ha= ve my > > email address as the originator of the bounced message. I believe there= are > > some SPAMers using my email address on their SPAM. I would really like = to > > avoid changing my domain name. Has anyone experienced this problem? Is= there > > something I can do? > > >=20 > It's probably "blowback" resulting from the activities of worm-infected > windows hosts. Someone you correspond with got infected and the worm > subsequently propagated itself by picking your name from their address > book and inserting it into the from: header of the message carrying the > worm. Then, badly configured MTAs send "helpful" NDRs to the "sender" > informing them that they're messages couldn't be delivered >=20 > Pretty routine, really. >=20 > G > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" >=20 Yeah, that should, for the most part blow over is a few weeks. In the mean time just filter to the trash. If it to big of problem, you can always delete the NDR's from your mailbox using a script on a cron job. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 00:45:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4E416A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:45:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au) Received: from smtp.ade.swiftdsl.com.au (smtp.ade.swiftdsl.com.au [218.214.228.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AA0243D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:45:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au) Received: (qmail 1548 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2005 00:45:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO daemon.foo.lan) (218.214.176.70) by smtp.ade.swiftdsl.com.au with SMTP; 24 Jul 2005 00:45:48 -0000 From: Ian Moore To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:15:36 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1202503.WjijGjKbcC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200507241015.45698.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> Cc: "Anthony M. Agelastos" Subject: Re: py24-numeric upgrade woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:45:50 -0000 --nextPart1202503.WjijGjKbcC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 23 July 2005 21:49, Anthony M. Agelastos wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I CVSup'd my tree and did a portupgrade -arR and noticed that > py24-numeric failed to update. To make a long story short, it unpacks > Numeric into /usr/ports/math/py-numeric/work/Numeric-23.8, where the > Makefile (or something) expects the first letter in Numeric to be > lowercase (there is a file inside of the work directory named > numeric-23.8 that is 1234555 bytes). See below for my output. I checked > the mailing list and the bug reports to see if this had been previously > mentioned and I could not find any evidence supporting that, so if it > has been mentioned, I do apologize. > Hi, I have a problem compiling this port too, after last night's cvsup. Here's = the=20 output of my build: =2D--> Upgrading 'py24-numeric-23.7' to 'py24-numeric-23.8' (math/py-numer= ic) =2D--> Building '/usr/ports/math/py-numeric' =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for python-2.4.1_2 =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for py24-numeric-23.8 =3D=3D=3D> Extracting for py24-numeric-23.8 =3D> Checksum OK for Numeric-23.8.tar.gz. =3D> Checksum OK for numpy.pdf. =3D=3D=3D> Patching for py24-numeric-23.8 =3D=3D=3D> Applying FreeBSD patches for py24-numeric-23.8 patch: **** can't cd to /usr/ports/math/py-numeric/work/numeric-23.8: Not a= =20 directory =3D> Patch patch-Src_umathmodule.c failed to apply cleanly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/math/py-numeric. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade40145.= 0=20 make ** Fix the problem and try again. Cheers, =2D-=20 Ian gpg key: http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~imoore/no-spam.asc --nextPart1202503.WjijGjKbcC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC4uS5PUlnmbKkJ6ARAkhTAJ4t0LMuMBqitbf2XQP7+J87dhUX8gCfbEUk 0uRtpbUlURMrceXOjRzYgy0= =beyD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1202503.WjijGjKbcC-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 01:08:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D50216A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 01:08:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from mail.efacilitas.de (efacilitas.de [213.133.110.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBFE43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 01:08:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-37-29.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.37.29]) by mail.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC831239CE; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:13:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1B112B136; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:08:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19298-07; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:08:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id F088712B09A; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:08:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E2E9EF.9060707@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:07:59 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050517 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Moore References: <200507241015.45698.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200507241015.45698.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Cc: "Anthony M. Agelastos" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: py24-numeric upgrade woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 01:08:26 -0000 You can fix this temporarily if you add the line WRKSRC= ${WRKDIR}/Numeric-${PORTVERSION} to Makefile, e.g. just before .include in line 28. I sent a mail to the maintainer yesterday. Björn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 03:23:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814B416A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:23:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3187943D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:23:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localdomain [70.98.247.55] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A995109F00DE; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 20:23:01 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6O3NwAM035776; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 20:23:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6O3Nq4A035775; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 20:23:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: Ima Camper References: <20050723181901.79329.qmail@web30001.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 20:23:52 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20050723181901.79329.qmail@web30001.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (Ima Camper's message of "Sat, 23 Jul 2005 11:19:01 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Syntax for fdisk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:23:01 -0000 Ima Camper writes: > While trying to solve another problem, a suggested fix > was to issue the following command: > > bsdlabel -B da0s1a I'm no expert, but I'll give it a shot. (I'll be using disk for disk, partition for slice (like the rest of the world), and sub-partiton for FreeBSD-partition.) AFAIK, you should never try to label a subpartion like da0s1a (or da0a for a D.D. disk), but only a partition like da0s1 or a D.D. disk like da0. You say that you set it up as a DD disk, so yes, you should have used "bsdlabel -B /dev/da0" > I've booted using the 5.4 IS0 CD and selected fixit > from the sysinstall program. Using fdisk to check > /dev/da0 I see all 4 slices marked as "UNUSED". > However on /dev/da1 that was fdisked the same, the > first slice has information. I don't remember what a DD disk looks like in fdisk, but I wouldn't be suprised if a disk with one partition looked the same whether it had a partition table with one used entry or a truly DD disk with no partition table. > At the fixit prompt, I can mount /dev/da0 and see all > my data. Is there a way to use fdisk from the command > line to restore slice 1 without losing all my data? > What would be the correct syntax? Am I on the right > track? You shouldn't be able to mount /dev/da0, just /dev/da0a, and whatever other subpartitions da0 has. Assuming that you meant that, then if you can mount it, I'd guess it probably has an OK disklabel. Look (with "bsdlabel ad0"). My guess is that the previous labeling attempt wrote something where the first non-DD partition should be located and messed up one of your boot files. If that's the case, you're going to need another disk with a running OS to re-install the OS to the corrupted disk. I hope I'm wrong. Or could it be that you did a "boot0cfg" so the boot loader thinks the OS is on da0s1 instead of da0? Maybe try running that correctly from fixit. Finally, I also wouldn't be suprised if use of a DD disk has been utterly broken, since there seems to be great antipathy towards use of it, in the documentation and installer. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 03:24:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2909C16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:24:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nawcom@nawcom.no-ip.com) Received: from nawcom.no-ip.com (adsl-69-208-115-218.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net [69.208.115.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D768643D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:24:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nawcom@nawcom.no-ip.com) Received: from [192.168.212.8] (unknown [192.168.212.8]) by nawcom.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6242864B2; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:49:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42E30A05.2050108@nawcom.no-ip.com> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:24:53 -0400 From: nawcom User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Perttu Laine References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: making dvd from videos. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:24:53 -0000 i usually use transcode to do the "transcoding" for video to vcd mpeg compliant format, and also for pulling the decoded video off of dvds to the format of my liking. it's run by command line. if you try it lemme know if you need help. http://www.transcoding.org/cgi-bin/transcode Ben Perttu Laine wrote: >Hello! > >I need software to make dvd out of many divx, xvid, mpeg etc. video >files. What I'd like to is convert them either to vcd or svcd and then >make them dvd with simple menu. Which softwares I need for this? > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 03:42:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D664A16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:42:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br) Received: from coe.ufrj.br (roma.coe.ufrj.br [146.164.53.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449DE43D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:42:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by coe.ufrj.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD3817008; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:42:26 -0300 (BRT) Received: from coe.ufrj.br ([146.164.53.65]) by localhost (roma.coe.ufrj.br [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 49879-06; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:42:20 -0300 (BRT) Received: from [200.217.89.237] (unknown [200.217.89.237]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by coe.ufrj.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0FD17003; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:42:19 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: <42E30DFF.4050000@jonny.eng.br> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:41:51 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Gary W. Swearingen" References: <42DE8877.6050808@jonny.eng.br> <8xoe8x9qtu.e8x@mail.opusnet.com> <42DFAF63.5080708@jonny.eng.br> In-Reply-To: Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAADBQ TFRFAAAAgAAAAIAAgIAAAACAgACAAICAgICAwMDA/wAAAP8A//8AAAD//wD/AP//////ex+xxAAA Ac9JREFUOMtdk8FupDAMhr1qRbjR2x77GD3uq7BS1TkuhyrmFnppcvOrUlUquXltJ2EAIw1Dvvz+ bRPgrQbU6NpzuY0AF1LABIc4AH9crxLwb/4VztEU42W9SOBezwX4ClzeLuC9PBFRq+2xpJJHN8KQ Oa9Hd/ACnldgUVADvgHKA2usVwW12BVSkrThJH+5lqqQXIAAvRkQM6WqkADpO5gBx5m5VOxRgBZV HRLRcgc4dv3ukbOBm3de8uHIe1n0BBUBIi4hi0U2ownGkkwrwN425ygVPjntsvOmkFyyXYfreHXq f1tugFLCFDhZcsffYIqxKNAB/FkNbBDslUTz0MMQfuRnkN6D5nLVQ0G2H3bWC6KByTZPZWhJ/jgs ChX3e/P5y0VReCUCYm0/pUQd1lQ4/aIty/YtW6y3WMHc8yazpcU8UuqqB+LfMql/wVx4kXNTwGQO PxTuL7+AhbSkWS4z0TdZFbo1BR6qQkA08DnogNNHey/SGc5GejqFttxhjBHd3rjd62nR08gnxeFr Ic2e52we+QC0rIg6KYn1AKQsbF3wcgAP00MZrZ6X0yc5v5TRXgTi/jtVwef5I6Y+J7kyb+d1eB6K 4LoOLphBW/8PdNW9dapKWXwAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at coe.ufrj.br Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nForce3 SMB and Power Management X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:42:29 -0000 Gary W. Swearingen wrote: > João Carlos Mendes Luis writes: > > >>gaia::root ~ [647] mbmon -I >>No ISA-IO HWM available!! >>InitMBInfo: Unknown error: 0 >>gaia::root ~ [648] > > > I don't get that with -I (just with -S). It pretends to work OK; just bad data, > which might be related to the bogus temp. seen in BIOS setup screen. > > >>none0@pci0:1:1: class=0x0c0500 card=0x813f1043 chip=0x00e410de rev=0xa1 hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation' >> device = 'nForce PCI SMB Controller' >> class = serial bus >> subclass = SMBus > > > I get: > > ichsmb0@pci0:1:1: class=0x0c0500 card=0x0c111458 chip=0x00e410de rev=0xa1 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation' > device = 'nForce PCI System Management' > class = serial bus > subclass = SMBus What's your FreeBSD version? At 5-stable, ichsmb attachs only to Intel devices, that means that only chips numered 0x????8086 are accepted: /* PCI unique identifiers */ #define ID_82801AA 0x24138086 #define ID_82801AB 0x24238086 #define ID_82801BA 0x24438086 #define ID_82801CA 0x24838086 #define ID_82801DC 0x24C38086 #define ID_82801EB 0x24D38086 #define ID_6300ESB 0x25a48086 I'll give it a try, anyway. Maybe compiling a kernel with ALL smb devices. > It looks like I got at least one correct driver (ichsmb) in the kernel > and that you didn't. I don't know what to make of the different "device" > strings, or whether that's from the kernel or the MB. > > I see a couple more SMB things in /sys/conf/NOTES that don't sound > necessary, but I'll probably try; namely, > > options NETSMB #SMB/CIFS requester > options LIBMCHAIN > options LIBICONV > options SMBFS #SMB/CIFS filesystem These are for the SMB/CIFS filesystem, which is the network filesystem used by MS Windows networks. These are not related to power control. > > Here's what I've got now: > > device smbus > device smb # requires smbus > #options ENABLE_ALART # Control alarm on Intel intpm driver [machine=i386]; Not a typo! > device iicbus > device iicbb # requires iicbus > > device ichsmb > device ic > device iic > device alpm > device amdpm > device intpm # requires smb > device viapm > device pcf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 03:47:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E09F16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:47:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nawcom@nawcom.no-ip.com) Received: from nawcom.no-ip.com (adsl-69-208-115-218.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net [69.208.115.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2303E43D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:47:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nawcom@nawcom.no-ip.com) Received: from [192.168.212.8] (unknown [192.168.212.8]) by nawcom.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3B96722; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:11:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42E30F39.4050804@nawcom.no-ip.com> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:47:05 -0400 From: nawcom User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Perttu Laine References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: making dvd from videos. (- hey you're lucky!) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:47:05 -0000 heres a script for converting your classic codec based avi file to a VOB file for burning onto a DVD. i didnt test the program out, but i did check to make sure it's freebsd compatible. and luckly all of the needed programs are in /usr/ports/multimedia. You're lucky! http://inferno.slug.org/cgi-bin/wiki?AviToVob it looks like it does the following: -1. use mencoder to pull the video out of its container format or codec, -2. use mplayer to extract the audio channels into a separate file -3. converts the audio into an MP2 file -4. use transcode to convert the new avi into a VCD/SVCD compliant m2v file -5. use mplex to group the m2v and mp2 file to a full working mpg -6. use dvdauthor to make a legit folder containing the video file, title info, etc. im sure you can modify it to your needs. -7. use mkisofs to create an iso file out of the folder -8. use dvdrecord to burn the fucker. 8 steps in one shell script. not that bad huh. i may bookmark this page for future use. -Ben ================================== Perttu Laine wrote: >Hello! > >I need software to make dvd out of many divx, xvid, mpeg etc. video >files. What I'd like to is convert them either to vcd or svcd and then >make them dvd with simple menu. Which softwares I need for this? > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 03:53:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA5C16A420 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:53:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ptaylor@addressplus.net) Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (sccrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.202.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1060D43D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:53:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ptaylor@addressplus.net) Received: from addressplus.net (c-24-129-120-74.hsd1.fl.comcast.net[24.129.120.74]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP id <2005072403530501400k6rq2e>; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:53:05 +0000 Received: from [192.168.111.99] ([192.168.111.99]) by addressplus.net ([127.0.0.1]) with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v6.5.2.R) for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:53:12 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Paul Taylor Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:51:49 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.111.99 X-Return-Path: ptaylor@addressplus.net X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: DHCP3 Server on FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:53:06 -0000 Hi, I'm new to FreeBSD, so there is a good possibility that this is just something stupid that I'm doing wrong... I've had bad timing with linux software that I've tried installing in the past (just happened to try to install while there was a broken distribution, etc.) and I'm starting to think that is my situation here... I'm trying to install the ports version of isc-dhcp3-server... According to what I've read, it should be as simple as: cd /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server make (Set options in the dialog box, in my case unselect everything, then let it run the config, make, etc.) install -s work/dhcp-*/work.freebsd/server/dhcpd /usr/local/sbin Now, my problem starts with the make... When I run it, this is what I get: # make ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> Found saved configuration for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 => dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dhcp/. fetch: ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dhcp/dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dhcp/dhcp-3.0- history/. dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz 100% of 833 kB 408 kBps ===> Extracting for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 => Checksum OK for dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz. ===> Patching for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 ===> Configuring for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 Unexpected argument: server System Type: --subsys No build directory for freebsd - please run ./configure. ===> Building for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 make: don't know how to make all.server. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server. So, it looks like it works correctly up until the Configure section... This output: Unexpected argument: server System Type: --subsys No build directory for freebsd - please run ./configure. is from the Configure script, in the /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server/ work/dhcp-3.0.2 directory... It doesn't appear to be expecting the "--subsys server" that is passed. Now, I ran a "make -n" to get the actual commands that it is issuing, and it does appear to be running "./configure --subsys server" and I also noticed that the last make it runs is: "make -f Makefile all.server". That probably explains the "make: don't know how to make all.server. Stop" error... Now, the real question is how to I fix this? Am I missing some sort of environment variable? Is this port broken? Also, note that I have tried manually running ./configure and performing a "make all"... But I get this far in the make, then: make: don't know how to make omshell.c. Stop *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server/work/dhcp-3.0.2/work.freebsd. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server/work/dhcp-3.0.2. So, I'm hoping someone out there can assist me... Thanks, Paul From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 04:34:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2453F16A420 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 04:34:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD84443D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 04:34:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.247.55] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id AA6D18D30122; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 21:34:53 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6O4ZM8P000938; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 21:35:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6O4ZDd2000937; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 21:35:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs?= References: <42DE8877.6050808@jonny.eng.br> <8xoe8x9qtu.e8x@mail.opusnet.com> <42DFAF63.5080708@jonny.eng.br> <42E30DFF.4050000@jonny.eng.br> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 21:35:13 -0700 In-Reply-To: <42E30DFF.4050000@jonny.eng.br> =?iso-8859-1?q?=28Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs's?= message of "Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:41:51 -0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Total weight between 10 and 14. X-Spam-Tests-Failed: SPAMDOMAINS, SPFf, WEIGHT10 [11] Cc: questions@freebsd.org, "Gary W. Swearingen" Subject: Re: nForce3 SMB and Power Management X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 04:34:49 -0000 João Carlos Mendes Luís writes: > What's your FreeBSD version? At 5-stable, ichsmb attachs only to Intel devices, > that means that only chips numered 0x????8086 are accepted: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE i386 arch OS on Athlon64 CPU. I don't know about my chips. There are some other numbers than the ones you mentioned in the ichsmb manpage. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 04:36:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C79916A420 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 04:36:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from piccollo.p6m7g8.net (c66-236-219-70.ip.panth.com [66.236.219.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB8E43D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 04:36:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from [192.168.0.203] (pcp09579105pcs.rtchrd01.md.comcast.net [69.244.86.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by piccollo.p6m7g8.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6O4anh3001381 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:36:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Message-ID: <42E31ADB.7080405@p6m7g8.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:36:43 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Afterstep2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 04:36:58 -0000 I've been running afterstep for years now. since the 1.8.x version The 2.0.x version is even better, but versions after afterstep-2.00.00 seem to hang during startup as run as other then root. I've duplicated this on 3 different computers and freebsd versions( 5.3-R, 5.4-R, 6.0-C) Has anyone else experienced this. I know the ports at 2.1.1, but I can't get that high. Thanks in advance. END ------------------------------------------------------------ What doesn't kill us can only make us stronger. Nothing is impossible. Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) 301.254.5198 Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/ Senior Developer / Liquidity Services, Inc. http://www.liquidityservicesinc.com http://www.liquidation.com http://www.uksurplus.com http://www.govliquidation.com http://www.gowholesale.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 05:01:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DDD516A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 05:01:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lei.sun@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06ACD43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 05:01:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lei.sun@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 55so781250wri for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 22:01:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=UNPWP3eXdbjSPov30/zjaXziip9d+61awqVHKkmvkFio+6EFScROxTAHdFgsq2DG87lXalFV9W28bFH6iZlTTXMLQXAkB17h6BXJdPtR204netKrB6SpBGsUsaOEjErMJDLuwLs1VeAHU6RFopVGnohMxR/T9DltsqnbGRat7CQ= Received: by 10.54.43.63 with SMTP id q63mr1768039wrq; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 22:01:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.6.70 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 22:01:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 22:01:47 -0700 From: Lei Sun To: questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: turck-mmcache-2.4.6 disappeared from ports tree? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lei Sun List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 05:01:48 -0000 Hi, I am wondering why turck-mmcache-2.4.6 disappeared from the ports tree in 5.4, and later on I found out that it disppeared in 5.3 as well. Will it make its way back to the ports tree? Any Ideas? Thanks in advance. Lei From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 05:16:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318CC16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 05:16:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m@MHoerich.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A94D43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 05:16:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m@MHoerich.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2005 05:16:52 -0000 Received: from p548B5ED7.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO localhost) [84.139.94.215] by mail.gmx.net (mp021) with SMTP; 24 Jul 2005 07:16:52 +0200 X-Authenticated: #5114400 Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:16:48 +0200 From: Mario Hoerich To: aj@siegel-tech.net Message-ID: <20050724051648.GA4119@Pandora.MHoerich.de> References: <20050721070434.254A11D930@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> <200507231250.16501.bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200507231250.16501.bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: undelete in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 05:16:56 -0000 # Aaron Siegel: [ there is no un-rm ] > > One option I have seen for creating your own restore is to create a script > that will move files you want to delete to a temporary directory, a "Trash > Bin". Then use your shells aliases to alias the script to the rm command. Don't *ever* create aliases for rm(1). rm's sole purpose in life is to destroy files. If you tame it, you'll eventually adapt and rm with less caution. There are lots of people who eventually got bitten by that when working on a machine other than their own. A better way is to use a name like "[tT]rash" or "tt" (=[move] to trash). That way, when working on a machine without your script, you'll get a nice and friendly "command not found" reminding you there's no safety catch. I'm personally none too fond of this, though. Unixoid systems have quite a lot of ways to destroy files. Trashes won't really protect you from that. Instead, they just give you a false feeling of security, which merely encourages sloppiness. My own solution is actually quite simple: I treat dangerous commands the same way I'd carry a deadly and pretty annoyed snake: with my thoughts on the task at hand. I read the command *before* I hit enter. Not the one I *think* I've written, but the one I'm about to execute. I also tend to tab-expand globs to see which files are actually affected. YMMV, though. Cheers, Mario From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 05:24:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E5916A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 05:24:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A70A43D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 05:24:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j6O5O8GS048000; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:24:08 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:24:08 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Lei Sun Message-ID: <20050724052408.GA84902@dan.emsphone.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: turck-mmcache-2.4.6 disappeared from ports tree? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 05:24:10 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 23), Lei Sun said: > Hi, > > I am wondering why turck-mmcache-2.4.6 disappeared from the ports tree > in 5.4, and later on I found out that it disppeared in 5.3 as well. > > Will it make its way back to the ports tree? port moved to www/eaccelerator on 2005-01-19 REASON: project changed name -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 07:10:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B6716A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:10:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@nezlok.unixathome.org) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org (nezlok.unixathome.org [66.154.97.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B20E43D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:10:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@nezlok.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B65D56B1 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:10:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nezlok.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 60861-10 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:10:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 50E495608; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:10:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050724071003.50E495608@nezlok.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:10:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unixathome.org Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2005-07-03 - 2005-07-23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:10:18 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 07:46:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7888C16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:46:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31CD643D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:46:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6O7kfMx014507 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:46:42 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050724003611.19c20a20@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:42:50 -0700 To: Paul Taylor , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: DHCP3 Server on FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:46:45 -0000 At 08:51 PM 7/23/2005, Paul Taylor wrote: >Hi, > >I'm new to FreeBSD, so there is a good possibility that this is just >something stupid that I'm doing wrong... I've had bad timing with >linux software that I've tried installing in the past (just happened >to try to install while there was a broken distribution, etc.) and >I'm starting to think that is my situation here... > >I'm trying to install the ports version of isc-dhcp3-server... >According to what I've read, it should be as simple as: > >cd /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server >make >(Set options in the dialog box, in my case unselect everything, then >let it run the config, make, etc.) >install -s work/dhcp-*/work.freebsd/server/dhcpd /usr/local/sbin > >Now, my problem starts with the make... When I run it, this is what >I get: > ># make >===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found >===> Found saved configuration for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 >=> dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. >=> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dhcp/. >fetch: ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dhcp/dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz: File unavailable >(e.g., file not found, no access) >=> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dhcp/dhcp-3.0- history/. >dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz 100% of 833 kB 408 kBps >===> Extracting for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 >=> Checksum OK for dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz. >===> Patching for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 >===> Configuring for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 >Unexpected argument: server >System Type: --subsys >No build directory for freebsd - please run ./configure. >===> Building for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 >make: don't know how to make all.server. Stop >*** Error code 2 > >Stop in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server. > >So, it looks like it works correctly up until the Configure section... > >This output: > >Unexpected argument: server >System Type: --subsys >No build directory for freebsd - please run ./configure. > >is from the Configure script, in the /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server/ >work/dhcp-3.0.2 directory... It doesn't appear to be expecting the >"--subsys server" that is passed. > >Now, I ran a "make -n" to get the actual commands that it is issuing, >and it does appear to be running "./configure --subsys server" and I >also noticed that the last make it runs is: "make -f Makefile >all.server". That probably explains the "make: don't know how to >make all.server. Stop" error... > >Now, the real question is how to I fix this? Am I missing some sort >of environment variable? Is this port broken? > >Also, note that I have tried manually running ./configure and >performing a "make all"... But I get this far in the make, then: > >make: don't know how to make omshell.c. Stop >*** Error code 1 > >Stop in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server/work/dhcp-3.0.2/work.freebsd. >*** Error code 1 > >Stop in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server/work/dhcp-3.0.2. > >So, I'm hoping someone out there can assist me... I just built the same port with the same options, and it built without error, so I don't think the port is broken. I did notice this line in your output: Found saved configuration for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 which would indicate that it is using options from a previous install. You might want to do a make clean in the ports dir, then rm -R /var/db/ports/isc-dhcp3-server to get rid of the old config. Then try a make install and see if builds correctly. -Glenn >Thanks, >Paul > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 08:04:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 490FC16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:04:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lei.sun@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975E243D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:04:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lei.sun@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 55so797567wri for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 01:04:17 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LmA0kQ8TQ0c8Yd/OQ8UE2DA3e7UpfTdPmp5O1tOs+L4aeosm8z7JKNeelp3T9NLqrB+aZUoromloa7O58LJMeRKqiSDEhZCusaOWKUCP8vrvOF+7qbfD2cIr5Iuh9l3QyhtR7bJqBHphmgEbdaRFXMDdfunjNPC5e/T9GgTY+Rc= Received: by 10.54.11.70 with SMTP id 70mr1797680wrk; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 01:04:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.6.70 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 01:04:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 01:04:16 -0700 From: Lei Sun To: Dan Nelson In-Reply-To: <20050724052408.GA84902@dan.emsphone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050724052408.GA84902@dan.emsphone.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: turck-mmcache-2.4.6 disappeared from ports tree? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lei Sun List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:04:18 -0000 Thanks a lot :) On 7/23/05, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jul 23), Lei Sun said: > > Hi, > > > > I am wondering why turck-mmcache-2.4.6 disappeared from the ports tree > > in 5.4, and later on I found out that it disppeared in 5.3 as well. > > > > Will it make its way back to the ports tree? >=20 > port moved to www/eaccelerator on 2005-01-19 > REASON: project changed name >=20 > -- > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 08:49:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A020416A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:49:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4C543D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:49:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 1684 invoked by uid 510); 24 Jul 2005 08:51:17 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.86.1/957. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-1.6/5.0):. Processed in 1.877364 secs); 24 Jul 2005 08:51:17 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-1.6/5.0):. Processed in 1.877364 secs Process 1675) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 24 Jul 2005 08:51:15 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1122195075.1041.2.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:51:15 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Reverting Ports 5.4 -> 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:49:07 -0000 Hi, As I have been having problems with 5.4 on my Compaq Pl5000, I would like to go back to 5.3-Stable. Is it possible to roll back the ports via CVSUP to 5.3 by just changing the TAG=. Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 09:12:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4450A16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:12:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A16D43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:12:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6O9C3RV016168 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:12:03 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050724015828.0ecca950@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:08:11 -0700 To: Robert Slade , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <1122195075.1041.2.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> References: <1122195075.1041.2.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: Reverting Ports 5.4 -> 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:12:11 -0000 At 01:51 AM 7/24/2005, Robert Slade wrote: >Hi, > >As I have been having problems with 5.4 on my Compaq Pl5000, I would >like to go back to 5.3-Stable. Is it possible to roll back the ports via >CVSUP to 5.3 by just changing the TAG=. There's no tags in ports like there are in src. You have to specify a date. Take a look at the "checkout mode" section in the cvsup man page for more details. -Glenn >Rob > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 09:54:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D614316A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:54:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markus@trippelsdorf.de) Received: from falcon.loomes.de (smtp.loomes.de [212.40.161.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8742343D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:54:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markus@trippelsdorf.de) Received: from port-212-202-35-78.dynamic.qsc.de ([212.202.35.78] helo=bsd.trippelsdorf.de) by falcon.loomes.de with asmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DwdBJ-0005ge-94 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:54:01 +0200 Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:53:59 +0200 From: Markus Trippelsdorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050724095359.GA684@bsd.trippelsdorf.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: Fan control software X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:54:03 -0000 Is there any software available, that can control the fans of my system, like the lm-sensors package for Linux? I can read out the fan speeds and temperatures of my motherboard with consolehm, but what I actually would like to do is to vary the fan speeds depending on the measured temperatures. -- Markus From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 10:10:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D13A16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:10:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jackqqpro@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4C343D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:10:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jackqqpro@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so248650rne for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:10:36 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=l1pfvjVce1zlMbRwb48o5wPZYFFFuTuPyBHHCPnL/jZa7kDwzzHMn3GktwYt0/xv4Ut+hiQWEPb2ohiscUB55Ooa4fmF5AU6Xdh9S71LU6PL7cFjPThWDoSrLEWlHqlCFw5v5lrR+LKmgV23Sa0HhUyoDfIVcq0rDLYiQdGeGtA= Received: by 10.38.97.71 with SMTP id u71mr1009409rnb; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:10:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.104.31 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:10:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <890a507f0507240310cfd8c38@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:10:36 +0800 From: jackqq To: "Gary W. Swearingen" In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <890a507f050723004844ce572b@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Holtek HT80232 NIC unrecognized on FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jackqq List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:10:37 -0000 Thank you! I tried setting flags and/or removing hints for ed(4) but it didn't work. I get the idea from /boot/device.hints that, perhaps not quite accurately, hints work more with ISA. But my NIC actually belongs to the PCI family. The last thing I tried before going mad saved me. :) I took a peek into the source of the NIC drivers. In /usr/src/sys/dev/ed/, there was a file named 'if_ed_pci.c', where I found a table to edit. The table was just located in the middle of the file. It read static struct _pcsid { uint32_t type; const char *desc; } pci_ids[] =3D { { 0x802910ec, "NE2000 PCI Ethernet (RealTek 8029)" }, { 0x50004a14, "NE2000 PCI Ethernet (NetVin 5000)" }, { 0x09401050, "NE2000 PCI Ethernet (ProLAN)" }, { 0x140111f6, "NE2000 PCI Ethernet (Compex)" }, { 0x30008e2e, "NE2000 PCI Ethernet (KTI)" }, { 0x19808c4a, "NE2000 PCI Ethernet (Winbond W89C940)" }, { 0x0e3410bd, "NE2000 PCI Ethernet (Surecom NE-34)" }, { 0x09261106, "NE2000 PCI Ethernet (VIA VT86C926)" }, { 0x00000000, NULL } }; With every product name preceded by its product ID and vendor ID, it was self-explanatory enough. So I inserted a line for my card, which read { 0x005812c3, "NE2000 PCI Ethernet (Holtek HT80232)" }, Finally, I rebuilt the kernel with a dynamic loaded ed(4) driver (if_ed.ko), which SUCCESSFULLY recognized my NIC. Hooray! Though without trial, I believe a kernel statically including the modified ed(4) would also work. However, I still wonder if there is some other way by which I don't have to edit the source. On 7/24/05, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: > jackqq writes: >=20 > > My ethernet adapter's chip is Holtek's HT80232. It seems to be not > > recognized by the GENERIC kernel or any if_*.ko module. >=20 > The ed(4) manpage has a "diagnostics" section and also mentions the > setting of "flags" (one of the hints) that "may be needed for some > clones". I might also try removing the "ed" hints altogether. >=20 > You DO have "device miibus" in the KERNCONF file, I hope. >=20 --=20 jackqq :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 10:16:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B78216A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:16:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from mail.efacilitas.de (efacilitas.de [213.133.110.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC7643D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:16:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-37-29.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.37.29]) by mail.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED71112397B; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:20:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FC712B096; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:15:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77065-04; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:15:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AAF112B02A; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:15:37 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E36A48.8020608@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:15:36 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050517 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glenn Dawson References: <6.1.0.6.2.20050724003611.19c20a20@cobalt.antimatter.net> In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20050724003611.19c20a20@cobalt.antimatter.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Cc: Paul Taylor , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DHCP3 Server on FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:16:01 -0000 Glenn Dawson wrote: > [...] rm -R /var/db/ports/isc-dhcp3-server to get rid of the old config. [...] "make rmconfig" is more gently ;-) Björn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 10:26:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 442F816A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:26:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from mail.efacilitas.de (efacilitas.de [213.133.110.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C077B43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:26:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-37-29.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.37.29]) by mail.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12851239C5; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:31:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE8212B096; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:26:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77065-07; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:26:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD8512B02A; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:26:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E36CC6.7050504@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:26:14 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050517 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Slade References: <1122195075.1041.2.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1122195075.1041.2.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Reverting Ports 5.4 -> 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:26:39 -0000 Robert Slade wrote: > As I have been having problems with 5.4 on my Compaq Pl5000, I would > like to go back to 5.3-Stable. Is it possible to roll back the ports via > CVSUP to 5.3 by just changing the TAG=. There are not much reasons to use an old version of the ports. Do you have a specific problem? By the way, most likely you mean that you want to go back to 5.3-RELEASE. The operating system whose "uname -r" shows "5.3-STABLE" is one of thousands states between November 2004 and May 2005. Björn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 10:58:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED4A16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:58:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6CD43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:58:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 2933 invoked by uid 510); 24 Jul 2005 11:01:00 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.86.1/957. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-1.9/5.0):. Processed in 1.587953 secs); 24 Jul 2005 11:01:00 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-1.9/5.0):. Processed in 1.587953 secs Process 2916) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 24 Jul 2005 11:00:58 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= In-Reply-To: <42E36CC6.7050504@cs.tu-berlin.de> References: <1122195075.1041.2.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> <42E36CC6.7050504@cs.tu-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: <1122202858.1041.19.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:00:58 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Reverting Ports 5.4 -> 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:58:49 -0000 On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 10:26, Björn König wrote: > Robert Slade wrote: > > > As I have been having problems with 5.4 on my Compaq Pl5000, I would > > like to go back to 5.3-Stable. Is it possible to roll back the ports via > > CVSUP to 5.3 by just changing the TAG=. > > There are not much reasons to use an old version of the ports. Do you > have a specific problem? > > By the way, most likely you mean that you want to go back to > 5.3-RELEASE. The operating system whose "uname -r" shows "5.3-STABLE" is > one of thousands states between November 2004 and May 2005. > > Björn Thank you for the reply. My problem is that the machine worked fine with 5.3. The Machine is Qad processor 1 Gb ram with hardware raid with 5 drives set as 2 Raid arrays and 1 spare. I did a CVSup to RELENG_5. I rebuilt world and the kernel. Here the problems started. On booting it could not find any hard drives. It tried to boot the correct drive, but failed. At the mountroot prompt the ? option only lists the CD and FD. As far as I can tell it is a problem with GEOM trying to take over the raid. I can boot using kernel.old. >From the 5.4 release notes GEOM is mandatory for 5.4. As I do not have the expertise to fix this and I would rather have a working system, I would like to role back to 5.3 as this worked. I assume that if I did a CVSup with TAG=5.3 this should get me back to 5.3_stable. I am not convinced though. Is this correct? Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 11:10:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1309516A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:10:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gouders@et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de) Received: from alice.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de (alice.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de [193.175.197.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC2943D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:10:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gouders@et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de) Received: from musashi.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de (musashi.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de [193.175.197.95]) by alice.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j6OBA3eD019601 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:10:04 +0200 Received: from karga.hank.home ([10.8.0.6]) by musashi.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OBA2nc081022 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:10:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hank@karga.hank.home) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by karga.hank.home (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OBCdVx095354 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:12:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hank@karga.hank.home) Message-Id: <200507241112.j6OBCdVx095354@karga.hank.home> To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message from Chuck Swiger of "Fri, 22 Jul 2005 04:52:56 EDT." <42E0B3E8.8030000@mac.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:12:39 +0200 From: Dirk GOUDERS X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 Cc: Subject: Re: ipfw and tun0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:10:14 -0000 > >>> I just started to use an ADSL line with PPPoE and want run a firewall > >>> between it and my local network. What I am wondering about is that even > >>> if I only have the default everything-blocking rule (deny ip from any to > >>> any) I still see incoming packets on tun0 with tcpdump. > > If you are using PPPoE, the system de-encapsulates the IP traffic off of the > PPP session via the tun0 interface. tun0 can be treated as your "external > interface" when writing firewall rules, setting up NAT, etc. Well, I am a little bit confused, because usually, I run machines with "real" NICs and if I activate firewall rules that drop packets from that NIC, I can run tcpdump on that NIC and will not see the dropped packets. This is the naive view, I have about this: NIC device (e.g. xl0) ----------------------------------------------------- packets -> packets -> ... packets -> packets -> ----------------------------------------------------- ^ ^ | | Here, ipfw checks Here, tcpdump listens the packets against and doesn't see dropped its rules and probably packets drops packets In the case of tun0, this order seems to be reverse... > Right. This implies that the firewall rules are working. If you > want to see what the situation looks like to a client machine > behind the firewall, either tcpdump on a client machine, or tcpdump > on the internal interface of the firewall box... Does that mean, that there is no way, to inspect the network traffic from tun0 after it has been "cleaned up" by ipfw and that is not forwarded to the internal NIC? Dirk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 11:57:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B573A16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:57:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au) Received: from smtp.ade.swiftdsl.com.au (smtp.ade.swiftdsl.com.au [218.214.228.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E04BC43D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:57:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au) Received: (qmail 9988 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2005 11:57:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO daemon.foo.lan) (218.214.176.70) by smtp.ade.swiftdsl.com.au with SMTP; 24 Jul 2005 11:57:11 -0000 From: Ian Moore To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:26:55 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200507241015.45698.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> <42E2E9EF.9060707@cs.tu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <42E2E9EF.9060707@cs.tu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2539823.SOZd5ErPue"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200507242127.06381.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> Cc: "Anthony M. Agelastos" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: py24-numeric upgrade woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:57:10 -0000 --nextPart2539823.SOZd5ErPue Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 24 July 2005 10:37, Bj=F6rn K=F6nig wrote: > You can fix this temporarily if you add the line > > WRKSRC=3D ${WRKDIR}/Numeric-${PORTVERSION} > > to Makefile, e.g. just before > > .include > > in line 28. I sent a mail to the maintainer yesterday. > > Bj=F6rn Thanks, that allows it to build now, but it falls over during the install: =2D-> Installing the new version via the port =3D=3D=3D> Installing for py24-numeric-23.8 MA Version 12.2.0 Numeric Version 23.8 install -o root -g wheel -m=20 444 /usr/ports/math/py-numeric/work/Numeric-23.8/Demo/*.py /usr/local/share= /examples/py-numeric install -o root -g wheel -m=20 444 /usr/ports/math/py-numeric/work/Numeric-23.8/Demo/NumTut/* /usr/local/s= hare/examples/py-numeric/NumTut install -o root -g wheel -m=20 444 /usr/ports/math/py-numeric/work/numpy.pdf /usr/local/share/doc/py-numer= ic install: /usr/ports/math/py-numeric/work/numpy.pdf: No such file or directo= ry *** Error code 71 Stop in /usr/ports/math/py-numeric. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/math/py-numeric. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade2187.0= =20 make reinstall egrep: /var/db/pkg/py24-numeric-23.7/+CONTENTS: No such file or directory =2D--> Restoring the old version ** Fix the installation problem and try again. numpy.pdf is actually in /usr/ports/math/py-numeric/work/Numeric-23.8 By editing line 48 of the Makefile to: ${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKDIR}/Numeric-23.8/numpy.pdf ${DOCSDIR} the port installs correctly. Cheers, =2D-=20 Ian gpg key: http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~imoore/no-spam.asc --nextPart2539823.SOZd5ErPue Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC44ISPUlnmbKkJ6ARAgL8AJ95XGxMzriVMF08zVxSGmP6Wg/Z/QCfX4Y2 +eMejoq83lw9aUTeADNxyzg= =7OFm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2539823.SOZd5ErPue-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 09:15:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C56C16A41F; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:15:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br) Received: from coe.ufrj.br (roma.coe.ufrj.br [146.164.53.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA47643D45; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:15:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by coe.ufrj.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCA317008; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 06:15:44 -0300 (BRT) Received: from coe.ufrj.br ([146.164.53.65]) by localhost (roma.coe.ufrj.br [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 84119-03; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 06:15:41 -0300 (BRT) Received: from [200.217.89.237] (unknown [200.217.89.237]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by coe.ufrj.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C71417003; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 06:15:40 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: <42E35C1F.1030004@jonny.eng.br> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 06:15:11 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs?= References: <42DE8877.6050808@jonny.eng.br> <8xoe8x9qtu.e8x@mail.opusnet.com> <42DFAF63.5080708@jonny.eng.br> <42E30DFF.4050000@jonny.eng.br> In-Reply-To: <42E30DFF.4050000@jonny.eng.br> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAADBQ TFRFAAAAgAAAAIAAgIAAAACAgACAAICAgICAwMDA/wAAAP8A//8AAAD//wD/AP//////ex+xxAAA Ac9JREFUOMtdk8FupDAMhr1qRbjR2x77GD3uq7BS1TkuhyrmFnppcvOrUlUquXltJ2EAIw1Dvvz+ bRPgrQbU6NpzuY0AF1LABIc4AH9crxLwb/4VztEU42W9SOBezwX4ClzeLuC9PBFRq+2xpJJHN8KQ Oa9Hd/ACnldgUVADvgHKA2usVwW12BVSkrThJH+5lqqQXIAAvRkQM6WqkADpO5gBx5m5VOxRgBZV HRLRcgc4dv3ukbOBm3de8uHIe1n0BBUBIi4hi0U2ownGkkwrwN425ygVPjntsvOmkFyyXYfreHXq f1tugFLCFDhZcsffYIqxKNAB/FkNbBDslUTz0MMQfuRnkN6D5nLVQ0G2H3bWC6KByTZPZWhJ/jgs ChX3e/P5y0VReCUCYm0/pUQd1lQ4/aIty/YtW6y3WMHc8yazpcU8UuqqB+LfMql/wVx4kXNTwGQO PxTuL7+AhbSkWS4z0TdZFbo1BR6qQkA08DnogNNHey/SGc5GejqFttxhjBHd3rjd62nR08gnxeFr Ic2e52we+QC0rIg6KYn1AKQsbF3wcgAP00MZrZ6X0yc5v5TRXgTi/jtVwef5I6Y+J7kyb+d1eB6K 4LoOLphBW/8PdNW9dapKWXwAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at coe.ufrj.br X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:57:55 +0000 Cc: questions@freebsd.org, "Gary W. Swearingen" , archie@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nForce3 SMB and Power Management X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:15:46 -0000 João Carlos Mendes Luís wrote: > > Gary W. Swearingen wrote: > >>João Carlos Mendes Luis writes: >> >> >> >>>gaia::root ~ [647] mbmon -I >>>No ISA-IO HWM available!! >>>InitMBInfo: Unknown error: 0 >>>gaia::root ~ [648] >> >> >>I don't get that with -I (just with -S). It pretends to work OK; just bad data, >>which might be related to the bogus temp. seen in BIOS setup screen. >> >> >> >>>none0@pci0:1:1: class=0x0c0500 card=0x813f1043 chip=0x00e410de rev=0xa1 hdr=0x00 >>> vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation' >>> device = 'nForce PCI SMB Controller' >>> class = serial bus >>> subclass = SMBus >> >> >>I get: >> >>ichsmb0@pci0:1:1: class=0x0c0500 card=0x0c111458 chip=0x00e410de rev=0xa1 hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation' >> device = 'nForce PCI System Management' >> class = serial bus >> subclass = SMBus > > > What's your FreeBSD version? At 5-stable, ichsmb attachs only to Intel devices, > that means that only chips numered 0x????8086 are accepted: > > /* PCI unique identifiers */ > #define ID_82801AA 0x24138086 > #define ID_82801AB 0x24238086 > #define ID_82801BA 0x24438086 > #define ID_82801CA 0x24838086 > #define ID_82801DC 0x24C38086 > #define ID_82801EB 0x24D38086 > #define ID_6300ESB 0x25a48086 > > I'll give it a try, anyway. Maybe compiling a kernel with ALL smb devices. Indeed, my kernel could find ichsmb. But mbmom still does not work. Are you sure you have no other smb device in your board? pciconf: ichsmb0@pci0:1:1: class=0x0c0500 card=0x813f1043 chip=0x00e410de rev=0xa1 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation' device = 'nForce PCI SMB Controller' class = serial bus subclass = SMBus dmesg: gaia::root ichsmb [518] grep -i smb /var/run/dmesg.boot netsmb_dev: loaded ichsmb0: port 0x5040-0x507f,0x5000-0x503f,0x5080-0x509f at device 1.1 on pci0 gaia::root ichsmb [519] Note that the kernel found ichsmb, but found no smbus. Looking a bit deeper into the sources, ichsmb does attach to *ANY* PCI device which identifies itself as a class "serial bus" and subclass "SMBus". It is a mistake, and probably a bug. Maybe a leftover from debugging phase. I am CCing: the ichsmb author to remember him. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 12:51:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3FC16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:51:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-07.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 013E543D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:51:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: (qmail 22253 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2005 12:51:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warren.shinji.nq.nu) (203.217.13.157) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 24 Jul 2005 12:51:26 -0000 From: Warren To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:52:40 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507242252.41445.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Subject: K3B & CD Burner X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:51:28 -0000 I am using FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE I just installed K3B and when i goto configure it, it dosent detect my CD Burner, even though i enter in the location /dev/acd1 .. what am i missing that it wont accept or detect my CD Burner ? -- Yours Sincerely Shinjii http://www.shinji.nq.nu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 12:52:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E528A16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:52:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (prime.gushi.org [65.125.228.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A51943D4C for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:52:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (danm@localhost.gushi.org [127.0.0.1]) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6OCqKZj013254 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:52:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from danm@localhost) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6OCqKMa013252; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:52:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:52:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050724081711.I7429@prime.gushi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Questions on termcap suggestions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:52:07 -0000 Hey all, Apologies. Long. Late. (Early). I just spent a few hours longer than I feel I should have had to learning about ANSI escape sequences and the raw unadulterated line-noise-like readability of the system termcap file. Here's the basics: I use pine's "print" command, which works fine, under a normal login (term type is vt100). Then I started with screen, which ignores the escape sequences pine sends and does not pass them on to the remote terminal. After a little research, I found the escape sequences for printer enableing and disabling, and I added the following to the termcap entry for "vt100" and rebuilt the thing: po=\E[5i:pf=\E[4i: And once I restarted screen, it worked. I'm sending this through so someone may find it in the future and save themself some effort. Now, I'm pretty sure those termcap entries are standard things, so I dunno if I can just throw in a send-pr to have them added (if I should, let me know, and I will). Otherwise, is there a sensible way to suggest this be added somewhere else? I mean, I don't want to set the assumption that ANY terminal setting itself as vt100 is in fact print-capable. (but then, pine without screen will do the same damage anyway). I'd say half the problem is in pine, honestly, which never *should* have worked without those entries present, but pine apparently doesn't check, instead just sending those sequences on its own. Related: In searching around I've also found a teeny tiny little program called lpansi that allows you to cat a file to your local printer. Shouldn't something like this be in the base, or in ports? I found things like birthstone references and what certain flowers mean in /usr/share/misc, why not a useful "print" command? -Dan -- "You're a thucking reyer!" -Richard Bozzello, who believed tongue piercing was painless. --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org --------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 12:57:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6677D16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:57:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ptaylor@addressplus.net) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E191143D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:57:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ptaylor@addressplus.net) Received: from addressplus.net (c-24-129-120-74.hsd1.fl.comcast.net[24.129.120.74]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2005072412570301500a2n8pe>; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:57:04 +0000 Received: from [192.168.111.99] ([192.168.111.99]) by addressplus.net ([127.0.0.1]) with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v6.5.2.R) for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:56:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20050724003611.19c20a20@cobalt.antimatter.net> References: <6.1.0.6.2.20050724003611.19c20a20@cobalt.antimatter.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Paul Taylor Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:54:59 -0400 To: Glenn Dawson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.111.99 X-Return-Path: ptaylor@addressplus.net X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DHCP3 Server on FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:57:05 -0000 Glenn, Thanks for the suggestions, but I'm still coming up with the same failure... You said that it built for you - Are you on FreeBSD 4.11, or a newer build of FreeBSD? I ask because the maintainer of this port stated in this post (http:// lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-April/084442.html) that he didn't have a FreeBSD 4.11 box to test on and that that particular user's problem was related specifically to 4.11. I'm actually doing this to try to create a monowall development box, which uses 4.11 as a base system. My FreeBSD box is actually a VM. We need to be able to create our own special builds of monowall to add at least one new feature. The way things usually work is that one real reason starts us tinkering, then many additional features are suddenly "needed" once management realizes that we can add them... :) Paul On Jul 24, 2005, at 3:42 AM, Glenn Dawson wrote: > At 08:51 PM 7/23/2005, Paul Taylor wrote: > > >> Hi, >> >> I'm new to FreeBSD, so there is a good possibility that this is just >> something stupid that I'm doing wrong... I've had bad timing with >> linux software that I've tried installing in the past (just happened >> to try to install while there was a broken distribution, etc.) and >> I'm starting to think that is my situation here... >> >> I'm trying to install the ports version of isc-dhcp3-server... >> According to what I've read, it should be as simple as: >> >> cd /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server >> make >> (Set options in the dialog box, in my case unselect everything, then >> let it run the config, make, etc.) >> install -s work/dhcp-*/work.freebsd/server/dhcpd /usr/local/sbin >> >> Now, my problem starts with the make... When I run it, this is what >> I get: >> >> # make >> ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found >> ===> Found saved configuration for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 >> => dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. >> => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dhcp/. >> fetch: ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dhcp/dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz: File unavailable >> (e.g., file not found, no access) >> => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dhcp/dhcp-3.0- >> history/. >> dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz 100% of 833 kB 408 >> kBps >> ===> Extracting for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 >> => Checksum OK for dhcp-3.0.2.tar.gz. >> ===> Patching for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 >> ===> Configuring for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 >> Unexpected argument: server >> System Type: --subsys >> No build directory for freebsd - please run ./configure. >> ===> Building for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 >> make: don't know how to make all.server. Stop >> *** Error code 2 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server. >> >> So, it looks like it works correctly up until the Configure >> section... >> >> This output: >> >> Unexpected argument: server >> System Type: --subsys >> No build directory for freebsd - please run ./configure. >> >> is from the Configure script, in the /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3- >> server/ work/dhcp-3.0.2 directory... It doesn't appear to be >> expecting the >> "--subsys server" that is passed. >> >> Now, I ran a "make -n" to get the actual commands that it is issuing, >> and it does appear to be running "./configure --subsys server" and I >> also noticed that the last make it runs is: "make -f Makefile >> all.server". That probably explains the "make: don't know how to >> make all.server. Stop" error... >> >> Now, the real question is how to I fix this? Am I missing some sort >> of environment variable? Is this port broken? >> >> Also, note that I have tried manually running ./configure and >> performing a "make all"... But I get this far in the make, then: >> >> make: don't know how to make omshell.c. Stop >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server/work/dhcp-3.0.2/work.freebsd. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server/work/dhcp-3.0.2. >> >> So, I'm hoping someone out there can assist me... >> > > I just built the same port with the same options, and it built > without error, so I don't think the port is broken. > > I did notice this line in your output: > > Found saved configuration for isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_8 > > which would indicate that it is using options from a previous > install. You might want to do a make clean in the ports dir, then > rm -R /var/db/ports/isc-dhcp3-server to get rid of the old config. > Then try a make install and see if builds correctly. > > -Glenn > > >> Thanks, >> Paul >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 13:28:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B449F16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:28:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nb_root@videotron.ca) Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7024443D49 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:28:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nb_root@videotron.ca) Received: from clk01a ([66.130.198.54]) by VL-MO-MR007.ip.videotron.ca (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0IK4002OMW2X7G@VL-MO-MR007.ip.videotron.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:28:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:28:09 -0400 From: Nicolas Blais In-reply-to: <200507242252.41445.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <200507240928.09202.nb_root@videotron.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200507242252.41445.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Subject: Re: K3B & CD Burner X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:28:10 -0000 On July 24, 2005 08:52 am, Warren wrote: > I am using FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE > > I just installed K3B and when i goto configure it, it dosent detect my CD > Burner, even though i enter in the location /dev/acd1 .. what am i missing > that it wont accept or detect my CD Burner ? Run K3B as root. -- FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #4: Sat Jul 16 11:11:37 EDT 2005 root@clk01a:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CLK01A PGP? : http://66.130.198.54:8081/security/nb_root.asc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 13:30:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6AD16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:30:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: from excite.com (nn7.excitenetwork.com [207.159.120.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9032043D49 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:30:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: by xprdmailfe25.nwk.excite.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 343CABE107; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:30:55 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from [84.73.114.198] by xprdmailfe26.nwk.excite.com via HTTP; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:30:55 EST X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: ID = 2383e4973664c80f7198bf469d15c13b From: "PK" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: piotrekk@excite.com X-Mailer: PHP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050724133055.343CABE107@xprdmailfe25.nwk.excite.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:30:55 -0400 (EDT) Subject: howto export kde from freeBSD 5.4 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: piotrekk@excite.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:30:57 -0000 hi howto allow kde export from freeBSD 5.4 ? I mean to load KDE, for example with X-Win32 http://www.xwin32.com/en/products/ on the windows machine ? kind regards piotr _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 13:39:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF8916A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:39:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776BA43D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:39:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 4274 invoked by uid 510); 24 Jul 2005 13:41:19 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.86.1/957. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-1.7/5.0):. Processed in 1.835242 secs); 24 Jul 2005 13:41:19 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-1.7/5.0):. Processed in 1.835242 secs Process 4267) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 24 Jul 2005 13:41:17 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: <20050724133055.343CABE107@xprdmailfe25.nwk.excite.com> References: <20050724133055.343CABE107@xprdmailfe25.nwk.excite.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1122212476.1041.23.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:41:16 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: howto export kde from freeBSD 5.4 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:39:08 -0000 On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 13:30, PK wrote: > hi > > howto allow kde export from freeBSD 5.4 ? > > I mean to load KDE, for example with X-Win32 > > http://www.xwin32.com/en/products/ > > on the windows machine ? > > kind regards > piotr > > You are probably better off with VNC. Freebsd has a VNC Server in the ports and there are several free vnc clients for windows. Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 14:00:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F5816A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:00:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: from excite.com (nn7.excitenetwork.com [207.159.120.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C23043D5C for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:00:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: by xprdmailfe25.nwk.excite.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 086CBBE107; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:00:40 -0400 (EDT) To: bsd@bathnetworks.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from [84.73.114.198] by xprdmailfe26.nwk.excite.com via HTTP; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:00:40 EST X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: ID = 2383e4973664c80f7198bf469d15c13b From: "PK" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: piotrekk@excite.com X-Mailer: PHP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050724140040.086CBBE107@xprdmailfe25.nwk.excite.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:00:40 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Subject: Re: howto export kde from freeBSD 5.4 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: piotrekk@excite.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:00:42 -0000 yes, I know VNC but VNC create all the time a new KDE session and I'd like to export already running KDE session. --- On Sun 07/24, Robert Slade < bsd@bathnetworks.com > wrote: From: Robert Slade [mailto: bsd@bathnetworks.com] To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:41:16 +0000 Subject: Re: howto export kde from freeBSD 5.4 ? On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 13:30, PK wrote:
> hi
>
> howto allow kde export from freeBSD 5.4 ?
>
> I mean to load KDE, for example with X-Win32
>
> http://www.xwin32.com/en/products/
>
> on the windows machine ?
>
> kind regards
> piotr
>
>

You are probably better off with VNC. Freebsd has a VNC Server in the
ports and there are several free vnc clients for windows.

Rob

_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 14:02:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2BD16A420 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:02:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from mail.efacilitas.de (efacilitas.de [213.133.110.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C926943D58 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:02:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-37-29.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.37.29]) by mail.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D4A123964; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:06:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7A112B1C4; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:01:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 78596-04; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:01:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2191712B02A; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:01:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E39F43.3050307@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:01:39 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050517 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Moore References: <200507241015.45698.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> <42E2E9EF.9060707@cs.tu-berlin.de> <200507242127.06381.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200507242127.06381.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Cc: "Anthony M. Agelastos" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: py24-numeric upgrade woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:02:07 -0000 Ian Moore wrote: > numpy.pdf is actually in /usr/ports/math/py-numeric/work/Numeric-23.8 > By editing line 48 of the Makefile to: > ${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKDIR}/Numeric-23.8/numpy.pdf ${DOCSDIR} > the port installs correctly. Ok, thanks. I didn't noticed it because I have NOPORTDOCS=yes in my make.conf. Regards Björn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 14:03:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C94A16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:03:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from stelesys.com (web1.stelesys.com [63.175.100.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B27A43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:03:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=www.stelesys.com) by stelesys.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1Dwh4X-000CC2-S5; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:03:17 -0400 Received: from 24.99.220.144 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jbell@stelesys.com); by www.stelesys.com with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:03:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1826.24.99.220.144.1122213797.squirrel@24.99.220.144> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:03:17 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jerry Bell" To: "Lei Sun" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: turck-mmcache-2.4.6 disappeared from ports tree? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:03:19 -0000 Turk has been replaced with eaccelerator, which is in the ports tree now. Jerry http://www.syslog.org > Hi, > > I am wondering why turck-mmcache-2.4.6 disappeared from the ports tree > in 5.4, and later on I found out that it disppeared in 5.3 as well. > > Will it make its way back to the ports tree? > > Any Ideas? > > Thanks in advance. > > Lei > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 14:20:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53A416A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:20:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leblanc@keyslapper.net) Received: from english-breakfast.cloud9.net (english-breakfast.cloud9.net [168.100.1.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39DAC43D5E for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:20:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leblanc@keyslapper.net) Received: from english-breakfast.cloud9.net (localhost.cloud9.net [127.0.0.1]) by english-breakfast.cloud9.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 6869FB776 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:20:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from keyslapper.net (250-119.customer.cloud9.net [168.100.250.119]) by english-breakfast.cloud9.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D4DB638 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:20:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by keyslapper.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD8411579 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:20:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from keyslapper.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (keyslapper.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39063-01 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:20:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: by keyslapper.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C6E3D11454; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:20:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:20:49 -0400 From: Louis LeBlanc To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050724142049.GA50696@keyslapper.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200507231237.44829.bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net> <42E2DCAC.3060700@grokking.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42E2DCAC.3060700@grokking.org> X-PGP-Key: http://www.keyslapper.net/~leblanc/leblanc-at-keyslapper-net.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at keyslapper.net X-AntiVirus: Checked by Vexira Antivirus v1.5 Subject: Re: [OT Re: SPAM Problem] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:20:56 -0000 --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/23/05 05:11 PM, Greg Maruszeczka sat at the `puter and typed: > Aaron Siegel wrote: > > Hello > >=20 > > This message is off topic but I was not sure were else I can go to get = help=20 > > with my problem. For the past week I have been receiving messages from= =20 > > various mail servers which have bounced messages I have not sent but ha= ve my=20 > > email address as the originator of the bounced message. I believe there= are=20 > > some SPAMers using my email address on their SPAM. I would really like = to=20 > > avoid changing my domain name. Has anyone experienced this problem? Is= there=20 > > something I can do? =20 > >=20 >=20 > It's probably "blowback" resulting from the activities of worm-infected > windows hosts. Someone you correspond with got infected and the worm > subsequently propagated itself by picking your name from their address > book and inserting it into the from: header of the message carrying the > worm. Then, badly configured MTAs send "helpful" NDRs to the "sender" > informing them that they're messages couldn't be delivered >=20 > Pretty routine, really. Sorry I missed the OP, but this is something pretty much everyone sees at one time or another. I got to the point where I was receiving around 200/day before I started seeing myself in Joe-Jobs. Basically, they want a shot at getting through those servers that simply require a valid email address in the From: header. I find it ridiculous that these mail servers simply bounce it to that address rather than simply interpreting the headers and sending it back to abuse/postman/admin at the originating relay. This would certainly bring it to the attention of the very few people with the ability to stop the email coming. In the meantime, I'm afraid there's not much you can do unless you want to track that relay down yourself. Even if you find it, most times it's out of your reach (different country, etc). And if you do find it and it's coming from the next town over, it's not like the authories will want to convict anyone of identity theft - they still tend to go for the low hanging fruit, so best case scenario is you can get the ISP to shut them down until they find another provider. Maybe (big maybe) the ISP will sue them, but you don't get anything for your effort but the satisfaction that they got burned. I eventually shut down the domain I was getting so much spam at. I recently turned it back on after 6 months of downtime and immediately started getting over 40/day. Looks like some spammers never pare down the lists they sell. The only thing you can really do is install spam filters (like ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin) so you don't have to look at it. Just make sure your address isn't whitelisted. Lou --=20 Louis LeBlanc FreeBSD-at-keyslapper-DOT-net Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) Please send off-list email to: leblanc at keyslapper d.t net Key fingerprint =3D C5E7 4762 F071 CE3B ED51 4FB8 AF85 A2FE 80C8 D9A2 I do desire we may be better strangers. -- William Shakespeare, "As You Like It" --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC46PBr4Wi/oDI2aIRAgzsAJ40+kGLkRGmbZivIs7lhLXAHD2jwACdFxha OjABIzYydrlUyEnWwLrhMck= =GDT+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 14:32:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6969316A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:32:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leblanc@keyslapper.net) Received: from russian-caravan.cloud9.net (russian-caravan.cloud9.net [168.100.1.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A6C43D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:32:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leblanc@keyslapper.net) Received: from russian-caravan.cloud9.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by russian-caravan.cloud9.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 44F901587F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:32:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from keyslapper.net (250-119.customer.cloud9.net [168.100.250.119]) by russian-caravan.cloud9.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B4215488 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:32:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by keyslapper.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0227211579 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:32:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from keyslapper.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (keyslapper.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39030-03 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:32:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by keyslapper.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B871C11452; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:32:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:32:52 -0400 From: Louis LeBlanc To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050724143252.GB50696@keyslapper.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050721070434.254A11D930@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> <200507231250.16501.bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net> <20050724051648.GA4119@Pandora.MHoerich.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gj572EiMnwbLXET9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050724051648.GA4119@Pandora.MHoerich.de> X-PGP-Key: http://www.keyslapper.net/~leblanc/leblanc-at-keyslapper-net.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at keyslapper.net X-AntiVirus: Checked by Vexira Antivirus v1.5 Subject: Re: undelete in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:32:57 -0000 --gj572EiMnwbLXET9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/24/05 07:16 AM, Mario Hoerich sat at the `puter and typed: > # Aaron Siegel: >=20 >=20 > [ there is no un-rm ] > > > > One option I have seen for creating your own restore is to create a scr= ipt=20 > > that will move files you want to delete to a temporary directory, a "Tr= ash=20 > > Bin". Then use your shells aliases to alias the script to the rm comman= d.=20 >=20 > Don't *ever* create aliases for rm(1). rm's sole purpose in > life is to destroy files. If you tame it, you'll eventually > adapt and rm with less caution. There are lots of people who > eventually got bitten by that when working on a machine other > than their own. =20 >=20 > A better way is to use a name like "[tT]rash" or "tt" (=3D[move] > to trash). That way, when working on a machine without your > script, you'll get a nice and friendly "command not found" > reminding you there's no safety catch. >=20 > I'm personally none too fond of this, though. Unixoid systems > have quite a lot of ways to destroy files. Trashes won't really > protect you from that. Instead, they just give you a false > feeling of security, which merely encourages sloppiness. =20 >=20 > My own solution is actually quite simple: > I treat dangerous commands the same way I'd carry a deadly and > pretty annoyed snake: with my thoughts on the task at hand. > I read the command *before* I hit enter. Not the one I=20 > *think* I've written, but the one I'm about to execute. > I also tend to tab-expand globs to see which files are > actually affected. >=20 > YMMV, though. I have to second this - every bit of it. Deleting files is not an area you want to get sloppy in. I've been bitten even knowing rm would get rid of these files for good. I once fatfingered a space between a '*' and '.txt' and lost a weeks worth of code work in one fell swoop. Trust me, it's a mistake you make once and kick yourself for indefinitely. Trust me, I tend to use rm very carefully now, re-reading the command each time I use it. And no, I don't believe I'm making the case for a "trash" function. I think that would increase the chances of sloppiness. After the incident mentioned above, I considered the trash function, and eventually came to the same conclusions Mario mentioned above. Lou --=20 Louis LeBlanc FreeBSD-at-keyslapper-DOT-net Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) Please send off-list email to: leblanc at keyslapper d.t net Key fingerprint =3D C5E7 4762 F071 CE3B ED51 4FB8 AF85 A2FE 80C8 D9A2 First study the enemy. Seek weakness. -- Romulan Commander, "Balance of Terror", stardate 1709.2 --gj572EiMnwbLXET9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC46aUr4Wi/oDI2aIRAnX2AJ9NotbvJtCaOfWhZuWv9uIh7wRmFwCfRchu cwjl1j1HmpJkO0fZOzfbsR8= =PgZh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gj572EiMnwbLXET9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 14:35:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D67116A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:35:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@ricin.com) Received: from smtpq1.home.nl (smtpq1.home.nl [213.51.128.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90D843D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:35:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@ricin.com) Received: from [213.51.128.134] (port=37933 helo=smtp3.home.nl) by smtpq1.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Dwha0-0006Qp-4a; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:35:48 +0200 Received: from cp464173-a.dbsch1.nb.home.nl ([84.27.215.228]:61662 helo=desktop.homenet) by smtp3.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DwhZw-0005zu-3Y; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:35:44 +0200 From: Danny Pansters To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Warren Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:33:50 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200507242252.41445.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> In-Reply-To: <200507242252.41445.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> X-Face: "0Qv=,p:+]LvuqrtS4U\z3k"qN=.1]@=?utf-8?q?=258=3F=3BPoab=23v=27F=7E=0A=09!Wm=5Fe-=24=7EL=5D=3B?=>[c*L^Qoladj)x@mH}Bqz"vLO?Zdl}[@V@=?utf-8?q?U=3Fx3=23lI=3A=0A=09=24DN=7E!Hr?=@K`-mNv"zXm MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507241633.51371.danny@ricin.com> X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean Cc: Subject: Re: K3B & CD Burner X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:35:50 -0000 On Sunday 24 July 2005 14:52, Warren wrote: > I am using FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE > > I just installed K3B and when i goto configure it, it dosent detect my CD > Burner, even though i enter in the location /dev/acd1 .. what am i missing > that it wont accept or detect my CD Burner ? Read /usr/ports/sysutils/k3b/pkg-message5 Dan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 14:41:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC0816A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:41:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169D043D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:41:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.247.55] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A8B551880094; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:41:57 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OEfsXX000987; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:41:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6OEfji6000986; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:41:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs?= References: <42DE8877.6050808@jonny.eng.br> <8xoe8x9qtu.e8x@mail.opusnet.com> <42DFAF63.5080708@jonny.eng.br> <42E30DFF.4050000@jonny.eng.br> <42E35C1F.1030004@jonny.eng.br> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:41:45 -0700 In-Reply-To: <42E35C1F.1030004@jonny.eng.br> =?iso-8859-1?q?=28Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs's?= message of "Sun, 24 Jul 2005 06:15:11 -0300") Message-ID: <3wll3w466u.l3w@mail.opusnet.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nForce3 SMB and Power Management X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:41:21 -0000 João Carlos Mendes Luís writes: > João Carlos Mendes Luís wrote: > > Indeed, my kernel could find ichsmb. But mbmom still does not work. Are you > sure you have no other smb device in your board? I don't see anything else in "scanpci" or "pciconf" or "/var/run/dmesg" which has this only related line ichsmb0: port 0x2000-0x203f,0x1c00-0x1c3f,0xe800-0xe81f irq 23 at device 1.1 on pci0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 14:47:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE6F16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:47:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50E443D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:47:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.247.55] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id AA1C51E80094; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:47:56 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OElomC001079; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:47:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6OEljH6001078; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:47:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: jackqq References: <890a507f050723004844ce572b@mail.gmail.com> <890a507f0507240310cfd8c38@mail.gmail.com> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:47:45 -0700 In-Reply-To: <890a507f0507240310cfd8c38@mail.gmail.com> (jackqq's message of "Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:10:36 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Holtek HT80232 NIC unrecognized on FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:47:17 -0000 jackqq writes: > Finally, I rebuilt the kernel with a dynamic loaded ed(4) driver > (if_ed.ko), which SUCCESSFULLY recognized my NIC. Good work. There ought to be a web page with little success stories like yours, to incourage more people to look at the source. I sure hope you'll file a PR about your addition to the file. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 14:54:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B275716A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:54:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from agniewszka@o2.pl) Received: from poczta.o2.pl (mx.go2.pl [193.17.41.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ABBA43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:54:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from agniewszka@o2.pl) Received: from aga (bgp119.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.28.79.119]) by poczta.o2.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE30137832 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:54:40 +0200 (CEST) References: Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Agnieszka Parchimowicz" Organization: www.tlen.pl Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:54:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera M2/7.54 (Win32, build 3865) Subject: Fwd: request X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:54:45 -0000 Good day! We are along with my family collectors of every gadgets of promotional different firms, institution and foundation, so, I is returned with question if capability exists from state -member of message some free promotional gadgets and reinforcement our collection? If here, our address: Agnieszka Parchimowicz Ul. Ossowskiego 9 86-300 GrudziÄ…dz POLAND We will be very grateful From greetings Parchimowicz -- Moim programem pocztowym jest Opera: http://www.opera.com/m2/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 15:03:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FDF16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:03:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4121143D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:03:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.247.55] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id ADEC5F090106; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:04:12 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OF48Hc001345; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:04:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6OF3xfD001342; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:03:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: Robert Slade References: <1122195075.1041.2.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> <42E36CC6.7050504@cs.tu-berlin.de> <1122202858.1041.19.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:03:59 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1122202858.1041.19.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> (Robert Slade's message of "Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:00:58 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Reverting Ports 5.4 -> 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:03:35 -0000 Robert Slade writes: > As I do not have the expertise to fix this and I would rather have a > working system, I would like to role back to 5.3 as this worked. I > assume that if I did a CVSup with TAG=5.3 this should get me back to > 5.3_stable. I am not convinced though. Is this correct? AFAIK, the only 5 thing called "stable" is 5-STABLE = RELENG_5, which, of course, is not stable; for that reason, you might try getting and trying it again -- you might have grabbed it at a bad moment, like between updates. And I'm not aware of a "5.3" tag other than "RELENG_5_3" (the latest bug-fix release) and RELENG_5_3_0_RELEASE (the original release). As for the ports, I doubt that you need to do anything, but it sounds from /usr/ports/sysutils/portdowngrade/pkg-descr that there's a way to revert ports as needed. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 15:29:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD16516A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:29:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6167443D49 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:29:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (wojtek@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6OFTFPh005442 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:29:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.12.11/8.12.3/Submit) with ESMTP id j6OFTEFe009749 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:29:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:29:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: FreeBSD-current/amd64 the only os that works! ;) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:29:34 -0000 i've just got new system (MSI Nforce 250Gb-based with athlon64). tried NetBSD, tried FreeBSD-5.4, even tried Windows XP PRO X64 and none of them detects builtin network chip. not a lack of driver problem - chip isn't listed on PCI bus at all!!! this motherboard is listed on FreeBSD webpage as having broken BIOS (not the only of course) and that's since April 2005 -current runs on it. and indeed - everything is detected and everything works. but 1) what are these all ACPI errors? can them be just ignored or it is a problem? 2) why - with interrupt controller capable of 24 ints and lots of them unused - network card and one of USB controller gets same interrupt 21? 3) is that high system load normal under net traffic. ftp'ing with 100Mbit/s speed takes about 10% CPU. with such fast CPU is quite a big value. is't it an effect of using same interrupt line that USB? thank you for all help and congratulations for FreeBSD programmers that make it fully working on that hardware! i initially wanted to use NetBSD on it, but FreeBSD at least works :) and appears to work much better under high filesystem load - so i will change my preferences. and USB mass storage devices really hot plugs and unplugs :) Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT-SNAP005 #0: Sun Jul 24 16:52:47 CEST 2005 root@new.dom:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/local ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 2800+ (1808.81-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0xfc0 Stepping = 0 Features=0x78bfbff AMD Features=0xe0500800 real memory = 268369920 (255 MB) avail memory = 250380288 (238 MB) ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) pci_link0: irq 3 on acpi0 pci_link1: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link2: on acpi0 pci_link3: on acpi0 pci_link4: on acpi0 pci_link5: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link6: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link7: irq 5 on acpi0 pci_link8: on acpi0 pci_link9: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link10: on acpi0 pci_link11: irq 5 on acpi0 pci_link12: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link13: on acpi0 pci_link14: on acpi0 pci_link15: on acpi0 pci_link16: on acpi0 pci_link17: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link18: irq 16 on acpi0 pci_link19: irq 17 on acpi0 pci_link20: irq 18 on acpi0 pci_link21: irq 19 on acpi0 pci_link22: irq 16 on acpi0 pci_link23: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link24: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link25: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link26: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link27: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link28: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link29: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link30: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link31: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link32: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link33: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link34: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link35: irq 0 on acpi0 Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x4008-0x400b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff,0xcf0-0xcf3 on acpi0 pci_link29: BIOS IRQ 5 for -2145927624.1.INTA is invalid pci_link23: BIOS IRQ 10 for -2145927624.2.INTA is invalid pci_link24: BIOS IRQ 10 for -2145927624.2.INTB is invalid pci_link30: BIOS IRQ 10 for -2145927624.2.INTC is invalid pci_link25: BIOS IRQ 5 for -2145927624.5.INTA is invalid pci_link27: BIOS IRQ 11 for -2145927624.6.INTA is invalid pci_link35: BIOS IRQ 11 for -2145927624.10.INTA is invalid pci0: on pcib0 pci_link29: Unable to choose an IRQ pci_link23: Unable to choose an IRQ pci_link24: Unable to choose an IRQ pci_link30: Unable to choose an IRQ pci_link25: Unable to choose an IRQ pci_link27: Unable to choose an IRQ pci_link35: Unable to choose an IRQ agp0: mem 0xe0000000-0xe7ffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 isab0: at device 1.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pci0: at device 1.1 (no driver attached) ohci0: mem 0xeb005000-0xeb005fff irq 21 at device 2.0 on pci0 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered ohci1: mem 0xeb000000-0xeb000fff irq 22 at device 2.1 on pci0 ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: SMM does not respond, resetting usb1: on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xeb001000-0xeb0010ff irq 23 at device 2.2 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: EHCI version 1.0 usb2: companion controllers, 4 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2: on ehci0 usb2: USB revision 2.0 uhub2: nVidia EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered nve0: port 0xb800-0xb807 mem 0xeb002000-0xeb002fff irq 21 at device 5.0 on pci0 nve0: Ethernet address 00:11:09:d2:83:6b miibus0: on nve0 ukphy0: on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto nve0: Ethernet address: 00:11:09:d2:83:6b nve0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pcm0: port 0xbc00-0xbcff,0xc000-0xc07f mem 0xeb003000-0xeb003fff irq 22 at device 6.0 on pci0 pcm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pcm0: atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xf000-0xf00f at device 8.0 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 atapci1: port 0x9f0-0x9f7,0xbf0-0xbf3,0x970-0x977,0xb70-0xb73,0xdc00-0xdc0f,0xe000-0xe07f irq 23 at device 10.0 on pci0 ata2: on atapci1 ata3: on atapci1 pcib1: at device 11.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pcib2: at device 14.0 on pci0 pci_link18: BIOS IRQ 22 for 0.6.INTA is invalid pci_link19: BIOS IRQ 23 for 0.10.INTA is invalid pci2: on pcib2 pci2: at device 6.0 (no driver attached) fxp0: port 0xa400-0xa43f mem 0xea020000-0xea020fff,0xea000000-0xea01ffff irq 17 at device 10.0 on pci2 miibus1: on fxp0 inphy0: on miibus1 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto fxp0: Ethernet address: 00:07:e9:0a:04:1a sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77b irq 7 on acpi0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: on ppc0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xc7fff,0xc8000-0xcbfff,0xcc000-0xcd7ff,0xce000-0xcf7ff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1808811452 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec IPv6 packet filtering initialized, default to accept, logging limited to 50 packets/entry ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert loadable, rule-based forwarding enabled, default to accept, logging unlimited ad0: 38165MB at ata0-master UDMA100 acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a cd0 at ata1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd0: 33.000MB/s transfers cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 15:45:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC4E16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:45:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D331C43D49 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:45:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:45:07 +0200 id 0000004A.42E3B783.0000F517 Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:45:07 +0200 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20050724154507.GA18016@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <6.1.0.6.2.20050724003611.19c20a20@cobalt.antimatter.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: Dick Hoogendijk Subject: Re: DHCP3 Server on FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:45:12 -0000 On 24 Jul Paul Taylor wrote: > > Glenn, > > Thanks for the suggestions, but I'm still coming up with the same > failure... You said that it built for you - Are you on FreeBSD 4.11, > or a newer build of FreeBSD? I'm on FreeBSD-4.11-stable and the port builds very well. I have (of course) the latest cvsup ports colection and use portupgrade (of portinstall if you install a package for the first time). No build errors whatsoever. -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 15:47:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A95F416A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:47:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E86F43D49 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:47:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.247.55] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A8141D3500A2; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:47:32 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OFmBAh001986; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:48:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6OFm5CE001985; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:48:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" References: <20050724081711.I7429@prime.gushi.org> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:48:05 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20050724081711.I7429@prime.gushi.org> (Dan Mahoney's message of "Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:52:20 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questions on termcap suggestions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:47:36 -0000 > I'm sending this through so someone may find it in the future and > save themself some effort. Good of you to try to document it; I wish I knew where else it could go. I wonder if there should be a wiki-type knowledge base for things like that. > Related: In searching around I've also found a teeny tiny little > program called lpansi that allows you to cat a file to your local > printer. Shouldn't something like this be in the base, or in ports? > I found things like birthstone references and what certain flowers > mean in /usr/share/misc, why not a useful "print" command? It's easy to guess why not: the developers who've paid their dues (or otherwise got their clout), and so control the contents of the base OS, haven't been convinced to put it in. You could write a PR proposing the addition, but you'd have better luck volunteering to make a port for it. As for "cruft" in the OS, a PR on the subject would be more likely to encourage some cleanup than any comments in -questions. Removing cruft can often be more work than adding it, so it tends to take plenty of encouragement, or volunteer work. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 15:49:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CFC16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:49:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from randomiadgf@fsck.ch) Received: from smtp.hispeed.ch (mxout.hispeed.ch [62.2.95.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2552643D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:49:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from randomiadgf@fsck.ch) Received: from angel-one.fsck.ch (84-73-157-166.dclient.hispeed.ch [84.73.157.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.hispeed.ch (8.12.6/8.12.6/tornado-1.0) with ESMTP id j6OFn3En013900 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:49:04 +0200 Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:48:33 +0200 From: Tobias Roth To: questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050724174833.6777bfe2.randomiadgf@fsck.ch> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.0beta6 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.1/989/Fri Jul 22 23:27:30 2005 on smtp-03.tornado.cablecom.ch X-Virus-Status: Clean X-DCC-spamcheck-01.tornado.cablecom.ch-Metrics: smtp-03.tornado.cablecom.ch 32700; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 Cc: Subject: How to remove bootloader from a slice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:49:05 -0000 Hi I am trying to remove a bootloader accidentally installed on ad0s3. I tried overwriting it with fdisk -B -b /boot/boot0 -3 but that didn't have any effect. And anyway, I'd rather see it gone than replaced with the FreeBSD bootloader. boot0cfg doesn't seem to be able to act on slices alone. That leaves dd, but as I am not sure how to do it correctly, I thought I'd rather ask first. thanks, t. -- Tobias Roth | Berne, Switzerland | http://fsck.ch From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 15:49:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD04F16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:49:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from felix-freebsd@fefe.de) Received: from codeblau.de (ipx10069.ipxserver.de [80.190.240.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DB343D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:49:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from felix-freebsd@fefe.de) Received: (qmail 20025 invoked by uid 1000); 24 Jul 2005 15:49:42 -0000 Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:49:42 +0200 From: Felix von Leitner To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050724154942.GA19992@codeblau.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: how to boot into freebsd installer using pxe? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:49:46 -0000 Hi! I would like to offer a network based install service in our LAN here, and I would like it to be able to install NetBSD, OpenBSD, FreeBSD and Gentoo. I have a PXE environment booting Grub 0.97, which can boot a Net/OpenBSD kernels and the FreeBSD loader. So far, so good. Which files do I need to offer over TFTP or NFS for PXE to boot into the installer? How do I pre-configure the installer to install from the install server per default, and not from the Internet? I'm not particularly glued to grub, if it is better to do this with syslinux (or $WHATEVER), I'm game. However, I need to have a boot menu offering all the above operating systems, I can not simply boot directly into NetBSD's PXE loader. And I want to offer a net-bootable memtest. By the way: OpenBSD ships the pxeboot file in their install directory, I would very much like FreeBSD to do the same. I would like FreeBSD to shop a tarball with the necessary files (minus the install sets) that need to be available via TFTP/NFS and a small README saying what needs to be done, in a system-agnostic way. I'm thinking about an install LAN on a LAN party here, so as many people as possible can install FreeBSD. The next step would be to offer something like a live CD just bootable over PXE. Think about the advocacy possibilities if people can just try FreeBSD over the net! Also, think about the environment, of all the CDs that don't need to be burned or pressed and then thrown away. Felix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 16:09:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527EE16A420 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:09:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D020043D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:09:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A615E23; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:09:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29176-02; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:08:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-54-113.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.54.113]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54D05C45; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:08:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42E3BD1D.4020301@mac.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:09:01 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dirk GOUDERS References: <200507241112.j6OBCdVx095354@karga.hank.home> In-Reply-To: <200507241112.j6OBCdVx095354@karga.hank.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw and tun0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:09:09 -0000 Dirk GOUDERS wrote: [ ... ] >> If you are using PPPoE, the system de-encapsulates the IP traffic off of the >> PPP session via the tun0 interface. tun0 can be treated as your "external >> interface" when writing firewall rules, setting up NAT, etc. > > Well, I am a little bit confused, because usually, I run machines with > "real" NICs and if I activate firewall rules that drop packets from > that NIC, I can run tcpdump on that NIC and will not see the dropped > packets. Are you 100% certain of that? What you've described does not match how tcpdump on a BSD system works here: nfw1# ipfw add 10 deny ip from any to any 321 00010 deny ip from any to any dst-port 321 nfw1# tcpdump -nt -i fxp0 port 321 tcpdump: listening on fxp0 68.161.54.113.2145 > 199.103.21.225.321: S 610825795:610825795(0) win 57344 (DF) 68.161.54.113.2145 > 199.103.21.225.321: S 610825795:610825795(0) win 57344 (DF) ^C 44 packets received by filter 0 packets dropped by kernel tcpdump sees the incoming SYN packets just fine, even if IPFW denies them in the very first rule. > This is the naive view, I have about this: > > NIC device (e.g. xl0) > > ----------------------------------------------------- > packets -> packets -> ... packets -> packets -> > ----------------------------------------------------- > ^ ^ > | | > Here, ipfw checks Here, tcpdump listens > the packets against and doesn't see dropped > its rules and probably packets > drops packets There's a diagram in the IPFW manpage that has a better description of the packet flow. tcpdump runs sooner than you've shown, and traffic through most interfaces is bidirectional. >> Right. This implies that the firewall rules are working. If you >> want to see what the situation looks like to a client machine >> behind the firewall, either tcpdump on a client machine, or tcpdump >> on the internal interface of the firewall box... > > Does that mean, that there is no way, to inspect the network > traffic from tun0 after it has been "cleaned up" by ipfw and that is > not forwarded to the internal NIC? You can either add a log rule after your IPFW reject rules, and have the firewall itself log the traffic which is permitted through, or you could use another divert rule and force that traffic into a daemon which looks at the packets (this is how natd works, after all). -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 16:13:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F82C16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:13:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marius@korsmo.org) Received: from elwolfie.com (elwolfie.com [195.204.13.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CA243D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:13:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marius@korsmo.org) Received: from localhost (elwolfie.com [127.0.0.1]) by elwolfie.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD64D5A for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:13:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elwolfie.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (elwolfie.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24090-09 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:13:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by elwolfie.com (Postfix, from userid 33) id 4404B5B; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:13:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mp-117-185.daxnet.no (mp-117-185.daxnet.no [193.216.117.185]) by elwolfie.com (Horde MIME library) with HTTP for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:13:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20050724181301.vl95fhi004gg8sg8@elwolfie.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:13:01 +0200 From: Marius Korsmo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.3) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elwolfie.com Subject: make buildworld fails in openssl/colldef X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:13:06 -0000 I get this error when trying to buildworld: mkdep -f .depend -a -I. -I/usr/src/usr.bin/colldef -I/usr/src/usr.bin/colldef/../../lib/libc/locale -DCOLLATE_DEBUG -DYY_NO_UNPUT -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/include parse.c scan.c echo colldef: /usr/lib/libc.a /usr/lib/libl.a /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/lib/libegacy.a >> .depend cc -O -pipe -I. -I/usr/src/usr.bin/colldef -I/usr/src/usr.bin/colldef/../../lib/libc/locale -DCOLLATE_DEBUG -DYY_NO_UNPUT -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/include -c parse.c cc -O -pipe -I. -I/usr/src/usr.bin/colldef -I/usr/src/usr.bin/colldef/../../lib/libc/locale -DCOLLATE_DEBUG -DYY_NO_UNPUT -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/include -c scan.c In file included from /usr/include/openssl/bio.h:67, from /usr/include/err.h:68, from /usr/src/usr.bin/colldef/scan.l:34: /usr/include/openssl/crypto.h:328: error: syntax error before numeric constant In file included from /usr/include/err.h:68, from /usr/src/usr.bin/colldef/scan.l:34: /usr/include/openssl/bio.h:225: error: syntax error before numeric constant /usr/include/openssl/bio.h:579: error: syntax error before numeric constant In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/colldef/scan.l:34: /usr/include/err.h:238: error: syntax error before numeric constant *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/colldef. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. I'm running FreeBSD 5.4 RELEASE, but want to update to RELENG_5_4 to get the latest security updates. I'm using the RELENG_5_4 tag when i cvsup. I have cvsup'ed from 3-4 servers at different times. I have also tried to cvsup to STABLE, but that does not make any difference. I've cvsup'ed many times during a 10 day period. There is nothing wrong with the soruces I get (i think). I've followed the manual, and done "chflags -R noschg /usr/obj/usr, rm -rf /usr/obj/usr, cd /usr/src, make cleandir, make cleandir" I get the same error every time, it happens very early in the buildworld process. I have also deleted /usr/src a few times to be on the safe side before cvsup'ing. I've tried deleting /usr/obj before building world. My /etc/make.conf contains nothing when I try to buildworld, but I have tried a few options without any luck. Deleting openssl (installed from ports) and all programs that depend on openssl does not help at all. Building world in single user mode does not help. Yes, I'm root when building world. my cvsup file looks like: *default host=cvsup.no.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default tag=RELENG_5_4 *default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all Any help will be highly appreciated. Thank you. Marius ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 16:16:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF7816A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:16:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C06543D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:16:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.247.55] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id AEEC2A10012C; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:16:44 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OGHMCY002444; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:17:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6OGHAiO002441; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:17:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: Tobias Roth References: <20050724174833.6777bfe2.randomiadgf@fsck.ch> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:17:10 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20050724174833.6777bfe2.randomiadgf@fsck.ch> (Tobias Roth's message of "Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:48:33 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to remove bootloader from a slice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:16:53 -0000 Tobias Roth writes: > I am trying to remove a bootloader accidentally installed on ad0s3. > I tried overwriting it with fdisk -B -b /boot/boot0 -3 but that didn't > have any effect. And anyway, I'd rather see it gone than > replaced with the FreeBSD bootloader. > boot0cfg doesn't seem to be able to act on slices alone. That leaves > dd, but as I am not sure how to do it correctly, I thought I'd rather > ask first. Check out the bsdlabel manpage (esp. -B and -B example). BTW, your "fdisk" command only affected the MBR and the -3 was ignored because you didn't tell it what to do with the partition table's third entry. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 16:22:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F01B16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:22:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from russo@bogodyn.org) Received: from bogodyn.org (mail.bogodyn.org [216.184.25.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB74E43D4C for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:22:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from russo@bogodyn.org) Received: from bogodyn.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bogodyn.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OGLtGk011569; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:21:55 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from russo@bogodyn.org) Received: (from russo@localhost) by bogodyn.org (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6OGLtG7011568; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:21:55 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from russo) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:21:55 -0600 From: Tom Russo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050724162155.GA11548@bogodyn.org> References: <20050722023347.GA5783@bogodyn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050722023347.GA5783@bogodyn.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: International Institute for Advanced Quantum Bogodynamical Studies X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on bogodyn.org Subject: Answering my own question Re: Iomega REV drive, FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: russo@bogodyn.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:22:02 -0000 I'm answering my own question on the mailing list, just to get what I found into the archives in case anyone else has this question. On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 08:33:47PM -0600, we recorded a bogon-computron collision of the flavor, containing: > I'm running FreeBSD 4.11. I last updated from STABLE in January: > > FreeBSD bogodyn.org 4.11-STABLE FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE #0: Sat Jan 22 13:10:32 MST 2005 russo@bogodyn.org:/users2/obj/usr/src/sys/BOGODYN i386 > > I just purchased an external SCSI Iomga REV 35MB removable medium drive. > [...] > When I attach the device and camcontrol rescan all, I get this in the > /var/log/messages: > > Jul 21 19:22:52 bogodyn /kernel: cd1: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-4 > device [...] > That is, the drive is detected, but as a removable CDROM, This is not peculiar to BSD. Low-level SCSI utilities in the SCSI controller at boot time also fail to recognize this thing as a disk drive, and even on Windows it shows up as a CD-ROM. The only way to write data to it is to use a windows-only driver. And since it doesn't use an ISO-9660 file system, the only way to read data off of it is with a windows-only driver, too. So the thing is a paperweight unless one is using Windows. One can use the windows explorer to copy files into it, and one could use it to back up files if they're on a BSD machine shared by Samba. Useless for system recovery, but perhaps barely functional as a data backup. Live and learn. -- Tom Russo KM5VY SAR502 DM64ux http://www.swcp.com/~russo/ Tijeras, NM QRPL#1592 K2#398 SOC#236 AHTB#1 "The only thing you can do easily is be wrong, and that's hardly worth the effort." -- Norton Juster From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 16:41:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E615C16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:41:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F6B643D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:41:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 32196 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2005 16:41:57 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 24 Jul 2005 16:41:56 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id E292141; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:41:55 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: erroring@gmail.com References: <601f1f2f0507221115134e67be@mail.gmail.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 24 Jul 2005 12:41:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <601f1f2f0507221115134e67be@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <44d5p8ma0c.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: deamon graphic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:41:58 -0000 LOadiNg_ writes: > Hello, I'm writing with a little question. I'm looking for graphic of > daemon (like on this one http://www.freebsd.org/gifs/freebsd_1.gif ) > but in highest resolution, minimal 1024x768. In free time I'm making > any graphics or wallpapers, and I want to make wallpaper with > propaganda of FreeBSD, but unfortenaly i can't find any good to remake > it... Have you got any graphics, or links where from i can get this > deamon ?. For example here is wallpaper which I made for NetBSD (for > myself, later published it). -- > http://netbsd.org/gallery/mobile-logos.html > http://netbsd.org/images/logos/loadingz-wallpaper.jpg > > Thanks in advance, and sorry if I mailed on wrong adress :-) http://www.freebsd.org/art.html And note the copyright links. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 16:46:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5620316A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:46:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B59443D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:46:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 11462 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2005 16:46:09 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 24 Jul 2005 16:46:09 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id E30DC41; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:46:08 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Emil Khatib To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44u0iuzvb2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 24 Jul 2005 12:46:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <447jfgm9tb.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Re: Download ports from another machine X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:46:10 -0000 Don't top-post, please. Emil Khatib writes: > Well, I just had an idea, as make fetch-recursive-list is unusable in > windows (unless I make a script or program to read it or I download > manually each of the packages), I would like to be able to boot a > FreeBSD system installed on removable media. I have a removable HD but > I can't boot from it... Is there anyway I could boot the system from a > floppy using a partition in the removable drive as root? Yes, that should be no problem; just break to the loader(8) prompt and tell it what to use for the root and kernel. But I really don't understand the problem; you should be able to take the *output* of fetch-recursive-list to another system quite easily. Use a floppy to hold the text, if you want... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 17:54:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CEE16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:54:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-html@jonathan-glaschke.de) Received: from mail.liberty-hosting.de (mail.liberty-hosting.de [195.225.132.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6B543D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:54:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-html@jonathan-glaschke.de) Received: from mail.liberty-hosting.de ([195.225.132.203]) by localhost (liberty-mail [195.225.132.203]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 75040-09; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:54:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jogla.fbsd (p50895F22.dip.t-dialin.net [80.137.95.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.liberty-hosting.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A0B158987; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:54:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jogla.fbsd (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jogla.fbsd (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OJsJGG003129; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:54:19 GMT (envelope-from jonathan@jogla.fbsd) Received: (from jonathan@localhost) by jogla.fbsd (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6OJsI0x003128; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:54:18 GMT (envelope-from jonathan) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:54:17 +0000 From: Jonathan Glaschke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050724195417.GA3065@jogla.fbsd> References: <601f1f2f0507221115134e67be@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <601f1f2f0507221115134e67be@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.liberty-hosting.de Cc: loadingz@gmail.com Subject: Re: deamon graphic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:54:41 -0000 On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 08:15:27PM +0200, LOadiNg_ wrote: > Hello, I'm writing with a little question. I'm looking for graphic of > daemon (like on this one http://www.freebsd.org/gifs/freebsd_1.gif ) > but in highest resolution, minimal 1024x768. In free time I'm making > any graphics or wallpapers, and I want to make wallpaper with > propaganda of FreeBSD, but unfortenaly i can't find any good to remake > it... Have you got any graphics, or links where from i can get this > deamon ?. For example here is wallpaper which I made for NetBSD (for > myself, later published it). -- > http://netbsd.org/gallery/mobile-logos.html > http://netbsd.org/images/logos/loadingz-wallpaper.jpg > > Thanks in advance, and sorry if I mailed on wrong adress :-) > > Greetings... > Pawel "LOadiNg_" Stanczuk > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Some greater pictures of `Beastie': http://jogla.net/misc/standing_daemon.png http://jogla.net/misc/standing_daemon2.png Jonathan -- | /"\ ASCII Ribbon | Jonathan Glaschke - Lorenz-Görtz-Straße 71, | \ / Campaign Against | 41238 Mönchengladbach, Tel: 02166-265876 | X HTML In Mail | Mobil: 0162-3390789, ICQ: 231021883 | / \ And News | http://jonathan-glaschke.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 18:04:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322AC16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:04:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from taige@bellsouth.net) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93D043D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:04:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from taige@bellsouth.net) Received: from [192.168.111.99] (c-24-129-120-74.hsd1.fl.comcast.net[24.129.120.74]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP id <20050724180436012009v72ee>; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:04:47 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20050724154507.GA18016@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <6.1.0.6.2.20050724003611.19c20a20@cobalt.antimatter.net> <20050724154507.GA18016@lothlorien.nagual.st> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <4AD47467-39D3-4C81-B63A-52D0DD1BC455@bellsouth.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Paul Taylor Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:04:35 -0400 To: Dick Hoogendijk X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Junk E-Mail Re: DHCP3 Server on FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:04:48 -0000 I'm using 4.11-release... I just installed it off of the miniinst CD image Friday night. I'll try a reinstall.. Perhaps I've hosed something up. Paul On Jul 24, 2005, at 11:45 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > On 24 Jul Paul Taylor wrote: > >> >> Glenn, >> >> Thanks for the suggestions, but I'm still coming up with the same >> failure... You said that it built for you - Are you on FreeBSD 4.11, >> or a newer build of FreeBSD? >> > > I'm on FreeBSD-4.11-stable and the port builds very well. > I have (of course) the latest cvsup ports colection and use > portupgrade > (of portinstall if you install a package for the first time). No build > errors whatsoever. > > -- > dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE > ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 > + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 18:21:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C04F16A420 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:21:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from apredoehl@go.mailsvc.com) Received: from mailsvc.com (mail.mailsvc.com [63.247.192.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1B243D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:21:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from apredoehl@go.mailsvc.com) Received: by mailsvc.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.3.2) with PIPE id 246401029; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:21:48 -0600 Received: from [66.44.0.172] (account apredoehl@go.mailsvc.com) by mailsvc.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.3.2) with HTTP id 246400966; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:21:42 -0600 From: "Andrew Predoehl" To: no-html@jonathan-glaschke.de X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.3.2 Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:21:42 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CIT-MailScanner-Information: Please contact 719-473-2800 for more information X-CIT-MailScanner-MS5: Not scanned for viruses: Contact Colorado Information Technologies at 1-866-469-3310 to add Virus and Spam filtering services X-CIT-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-MailScanner-From: apredoehl@go.mailsvc.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: SOLVED: KPovModeler port problem: why no OpenGL? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:21:49 -0000 >> I found a problem when I recompiled the >> graphics/kdegraphics3 port; the build and install were >> OK, but now when I run KPovModeler, it tells me, "No >> OpenGL support" and does not show wireframes anymore. >> >> I'm running FreeBSD-5.4-RELEASE-p4, and recompiling >> because I'm just doing an ordinary portupgrade on >> kdegraphics3. >> >> There was no problem during the configure step. Configure >> found GL, GLU, GLX, but found them.... >> >> checking GL/gl.h usability... yes >> checking GL/gl.h presence... yes >> checking for GL/gl.h... yes >> checking GL/glu.h usability... yes >> checking GL/glu.h presence... yes >> checking for GL/glu.h... yes >> checking GL/glx.h usability... yes >> checking GL/glx.h presence... yes >> checking for GL/glx.h... yes >> checking for GL... yes >> >> The only thing configure said I was missing was libsane, >> which I don't even need because I don't have a scanner. >> >> I'd really like to be able to use KPovModeler properly. >> Does anyone know how to fix this? Should I just give up >> and use a package? Do I need to install Mesa? It is not >> listed as a dependency, and in fact when I tried to make >> the graphics/mesagl port it says this: >> >> landru# cd /usr/ports/graphics/mesagl/ >> landru# make configure >> ===> Mesa-5.0.1_3 is unnecessary because libGL and libGLU >> come with XFree86 4.0 and higher. >> >> I have libglut-6.0.1 and xorg 6.8.2 already installed, >> along with the all the rest of KDE 3.4.1. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Andrew Predoehl > >Uncomment Load "glx" and Load "dri" in /etc/X11/xorg.conf, >and restart X. >That may help you. > ># This loads the GLX module > Load "glx" ># This loads the DRI module > Load "dri" > >Jonathan Thanks Jonathan, that solved it! I didn't have either module loaded. For the record, just plain Load "glx" alone was enough to solve the problem. I had removed both of these Load commands when I upgraded from XFree86 to Xorg, and I thought maybe I didn't need them anymore, since the example xorg.conf file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xorg.conf.eg does not indicate loading these modules. Then, I forgot that I'd removed them... Thanks again! AMP From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 18:31:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B24E16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:31:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gouders@et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de) Received: from alice.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de (alice.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de [193.175.197.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E87A43D4C for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:31:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gouders@et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de) Received: from musashi.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de (musashi.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de [193.175.197.95]) by alice.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j6OIVNeD020270 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:31:24 +0200 Received: from karga.hank.home ([10.8.0.6]) by musashi.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OIVM8C081676 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:31:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hank@karga.hank.home) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by karga.hank.home (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OIXrd2000676 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:33:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hank@karga.hank.home) Message-Id: <200507241833.j6OIXrd2000676@karga.hank.home> To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message from Chuck Swiger of "Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:09:01 EDT." <42E3BD1D.4020301@mac.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:33:53 +0200 From: Dirk GOUDERS X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 Cc: Subject: Re: ipfw and tun0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:31:32 -0000 > > Well, I am a little bit confused, because usually, I run machines with > > "real" NICs and if I activate firewall rules that drop packets from > > that NIC, I can run tcpdump on that NIC and will not see the dropped > > packets. > > Are you 100% certain of that? No, I now realize, that I was always inspecting ipfw's log messages and just assumed that dropped packets do not appear to tcpdump without ever verifying that assumption. Thanks for pointing that out. > > Does that mean, that there is no way, to inspect the network > > traffic from tun0 after it has been "cleaned up" by ipfw and that is > > not forwarded to the internal NIC? > > You can either add a log rule after your IPFW reject rules, and have the > firewall itself log the traffic which is permitted through, or you could use > another divert rule and force that traffic into a daemon which looks at the > packets (this is how natd works, after all). I guess, I will use ipfw's logging facility. Thanks again for clarification. Dirk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 19:27:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D481216A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:27:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (prime.gushi.org [65.125.228.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FCBE43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:27:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (danm@localhost.gushi.org [127.0.0.1]) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6OJS3SF015794 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:28:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from danm@localhost) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6OJS2t6015792; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:28:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:28:02 -0400 (EDT) From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" To: "Gary W. Swearingen" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20050724151859.X9042@prime.gushi.org> References: <20050724081711.I7429@prime.gushi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questions on termcap suggestions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:27:45 -0000 On Sun, 24 Jul 2005, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: >> I'm sending this through so someone may find it in the future and >> save themself some effort. > > Good of you to try to document it; I wish I knew where else it could > go. I wonder if there should be a wiki-type knowledge base for things > like that. > >> Related: In searching around I've also found a teeny tiny little >> program called lpansi that allows you to cat a file to your local >> printer. Shouldn't something like this be in the base, or in ports? >> I found things like birthstone references and what certain flowers >> mean in /usr/share/misc, why not a useful "print" command? > > It's easy to guess why not: the developers who've paid their dues (or > otherwise got their clout), and so control the contents of the base > OS, haven't been convinced to put it in. You could write a PR > proposing the addition, but you'd have better luck volunteering to > make a port for it. My logic in ports is that a port would be well suited for things that are either differently licensed (gpl, for example)...or because they significantly bloat the OS. This is 20 lines of code, a makefile, and a well-made manpage. I've contacted the author about the license. Aparently this util was included with lynx for a time but printing is now handled internally. Pine also includes a util that does it (not named the same), but it's not compiled by the pine port. > As for "cruft" in the OS, a PR on the subject would be more likely to > encourage some cleanup than any comments in -questions. Removing > cruft can often be more work than adding it, so it tends to take > plenty of encouragement, or volunteer work. Heh, no, I *like* cruft. I think it's cooly eclectic. Besides, who *hasn't* used pom(1) to decide if a backup isn't a good idea? -Dan -- "Blargy Frap!" -mtreal, efnet #macintosh channel, 8.10.98, Approx 3AM --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org --------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 20:20:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C5016A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:20:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A3243D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:20:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 7540 invoked by uid 510); 24 Jul 2005 20:22:21 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.86.1/957. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-1.9/5.0):. Processed in 2.27827 secs); 24 Jul 2005 20:22:21 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-1.9/5.0):. Processed in 2.27827 secs Process 7533) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 24 Jul 2005 20:22:18 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: "Gary W. Swearingen" In-Reply-To: References: <1122195075.1041.2.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> <42E36CC6.7050504@cs.tu-berlin.de> <1122202858.1041.19.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1122236538.1041.32.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:22:18 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Reverting Ports 5.4 -> 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:20:10 -0000 On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 15:03, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: > Robert Slade writes: > > > As I do not have the expertise to fix this and I would rather have a > > working system, I would like to role back to 5.3 as this worked. I > > assume that if I did a CVSup with TAG=5.3 this should get me back to > > 5.3_stable. I am not convinced though. Is this correct? > > AFAIK, the only 5 thing called "stable" is 5-STABLE = RELENG_5, which, > of course, is not stable; for that reason, you might try getting and > trying it again -- you might have grabbed it at a bad moment, like > between updates. > > And I'm not aware of a "5.3" tag other than "RELENG_5_3" (the latest > bug-fix release) and RELENG_5_3_0_RELEASE (the original release). > > As for the ports, I doubt that you need to do anything, but it sounds > from /usr/ports/sysutils/portdowngrade/pkg-descr that there's a way > to revert ports as needed. Thanks Gary, I'm now very confused. I CVSuped with TAG=5.3, built world and the Kernel, but got the same problem with the boot disk not found. I'm not sure what to do next. I guess that I could try installing world in case that cures the problem the worst that could happen is that I can't boot the system. I can always reinstall from CD - that is probably quicker than trying to build a RELENG_5_3_0_Release. Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 21:01:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA6E16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:01:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maarfree@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693C443D49 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:01:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maarfree@xs4all.nl) Received: from maarten.sandersatkins.nl (a80-127-55-226.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.127.55.226]) by smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OL15Xt005330 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:01:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from maarfree@xs4all.nl) From: maarfree To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:01:06 +0200 Message-Id: <1122238866.86406.3.camel@maarten> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: return category for a port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:01:08 -0000 Hi, I have just build /usr/ports/packages/All packages for all ports installed on my system with some awk and bash. Does anyone know a way to return the category for an installed port? I can't find any option in pkg_info. I would like to create the symlinks in /usr/ports/packages as well. Maarten From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 21:27:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D5A16A420 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:27:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-html@jonathan-glaschke.de) Received: from mail.liberty-hosting.de (mail.liberty-hosting.de [195.225.132.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF0343D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:27:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-html@jonathan-glaschke.de) Received: from mail.liberty-hosting.de ([195.225.132.203]) by localhost (liberty-mail [195.225.132.203]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93301-06 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:27:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jogla.fbsd (p50895F22.dip.t-dialin.net [80.137.95.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.liberty-hosting.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5BAB158933 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:27:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jogla.fbsd (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jogla.fbsd (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6ONRCfR023944 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:27:12 GMT (envelope-from jonathan@jogla.fbsd) Received: (from jonathan@localhost) by jogla.fbsd (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6ONRCrl023943 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:27:12 GMT (envelope-from jonathan) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:27:11 +0000 From: Jonathan Glaschke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050724232711.GA23936@jogla.fbsd> References: <1122238866.86406.3.camel@maarten> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1122238866.86406.3.camel@maarten> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.liberty-hosting.de Subject: Re: return category for a port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:27:28 -0000 Hello, On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 11:01:06PM +0200, maarfree wrote: > Hi, > > I have just build /usr/ports/packages/All packages for all ports > installed on my system with some awk and bash. Does anyone know a way to > return the category for an installed port? I can't find any option in > pkg_info. I would like to create the symlinks in /usr/ports/packages as > well. > > Maarten > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Ever tried pkg_info -v? jogla# pkg_info -v gimp-print-4.2.7_1 | grep Package\ origin Package origin: print/gimp-print Why do you want to create these symlinks? FreeBSD does it for you if you tell it to build a package. Like "portupgrade -p packagename" or "make install package clean". Jonathan -- | /"\ ASCII Ribbon | Jonathan Glaschke - Lorenz-Görtz-Straße 71, | \ / Campaign Against | 41238 Mönchengladbach, Tel: 02166-265876 | X HTML In Mail | Mobil: 0162-3390789, ICQ: 231021883 | / \ And News | http://jonathan-glaschke.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 22:01:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BBAD16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:01:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A98E43D49 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:01:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:01:15 +0200 id 00000028.42E40FAB.00000648 Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:01:15 +0200 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20050724220115.GA1567@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <20050722172708.GA31090@pooh.nagual.st> <20050724123753.5efeeede.dick@nagual.st> <20050724131530.38e9ae53.dick@nagual.st> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: Dick Hoogendijk Subject: Re: [courier-users] esmtp disconnect from server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:01:18 -0000 On 24 Jul Sam Varshavchik wrote: > dick hoogendijk writes: > > >On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 06:50:57 -0400 > >Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > > >>dick hoogendijk writes: > >> > >>> Sure, smtp service is listening. No matter on what address I call > >>> the oucier server (127.0.0.1 ; 192.168.11.1 ; localhost ; lothlorien > >>> even the outside IP, the message is the same for all: > >>> > >>> "Connection closed by foreign host" > >>> > >>> No log-errors. Nothing to check. and ONLY if I call FROM the host > >>> courier is running on. > >>> From all other locations everything works flawlessly. Strange huh? > >>> What can this be? > >> > >>Do you have IPv6 addresses assigned to this host? > > > >127.0.0.1 localhost.nagual.st localhost > >192.168.11.1 lothlorien.nagual.st lothlorien > >192.168.11.1 lothlorien.nagual.st. > > > >So the answer is 'no' > > Try removing the duplicate entry. I once did that already to no use. Just did it again: nothing changed; the same error "Connection dropped.." -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 22:06:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BDEB16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:06:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-html@jonathan-glaschke.de) Received: from mail.liberty-hosting.de (mail.liberty-hosting.de [195.225.132.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37BD43D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:06:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-html@jonathan-glaschke.de) Received: from mail.liberty-hosting.de ([195.225.132.203]) by localhost (liberty-mail [195.225.132.203]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00865-04 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:06:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jogla.fbsd (p50895F22.dip.t-dialin.net [80.137.95.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.liberty-hosting.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB4A158976 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:06:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jogla.fbsd (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jogla.fbsd (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6P06IZu024237 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:06:18 GMT (envelope-from jonathan@jogla.fbsd) Received: (from jonathan@localhost) by jogla.fbsd (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6P06IOP024236 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:06:18 GMT (envelope-from jonathan) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:06:18 +0000 From: Jonathan Glaschke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050725000618.GA24229@jogla.fbsd> References: <1122238866.86406.3.camel@maarten> <20050724232711.GA23936@jogla.fbsd> <1122241531.86406.7.camel@maarten> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1122241531.86406.7.camel@maarten> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.liberty-hosting.de Subject: Re: return category for a port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:06:39 -0000 Hello, On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 11:45:31PM +0200, maarfree wrote: > On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 23:27 +0000, Jonathan Glaschke wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 11:01:06PM +0200, maarfree wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have just build /usr/ports/packages/All packages for all ports > > > installed on my system with some awk and bash. Does anyone know a way to > > > return the category for an installed port? I can't find any option in > > > pkg_info. I would like to create the symlinks in /usr/ports/packages as > > > well. > > > > > > Maarten > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > Ever tried pkg_info -v? > > > > jogla# pkg_info -v gimp-print-4.2.7_1 | grep Package\ origin > > Package origin: print/gimp-print > > > > Why do you want to create these symlinks? FreeBSD does it for you if you tell it > > to build a package. Like "portupgrade -p packagename" or "make install package > > clean". > > > > Jonathan > Jonathan, > > I never tried pkg_info -v, but I see it works. The reason I want the > symlinks is because not all packages were installed using portupgrade -N > and I use my system to update my mom's and sister's ancient PC's. > > Maarten > > > You have to do "portupgrade -Np" ;) Greetings, Jonathan -- | /"\ ASCII Ribbon | Jonathan Glaschke - Lorenz-Görtz-Straße 71, | \ / Campaign Against | 41238 Mönchengladbach, Tel: 02166-265876 | X HTML In Mail | Mobil: 0162-3390789, ICQ: 231021883 | / \ And News | http://jonathan-glaschke.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 22:57:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324F616A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:57:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from galdes.andrew@saugov.sa.gov.au) Received: from adl0728.systems.sa.gov.au (adl0728.systems.sa.gov.au [143.216.236.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1AA43D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:57:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from galdes.andrew@saugov.sa.gov.au) Received: from adl0728.systems.sa.gov.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by adl0728.systems.sa.gov.au OUTGOING (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6OMvkJB001356 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:27:47 +0930 (CST)' Received: from sagemsbb006.sagemsmrd01.sa.gov.au (sagemsbb006.sagemsmrd01.sa.gov.au [143.216.59.14]) by adl0728.systems.sa.gov.au INCOMING (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6OMvkK8001349 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:27:46 +0930 (CST)' Received: by sagemsbb006.sagemsmrd01.sa.gov.au with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <3D8CA5CQ>; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:27:46 +0930 Message-ID: From: "Galdes, Andrew (ERHS)" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:27:37 +0930 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: FreeBSD is Very slow to load some sites X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:57:50 -0000 Hello All, Freebsd seems to take a long time (up to ten minutes) to load some web sites. When i use Linux or Windows it seems to load at normal speed. I have installed Freebsd (same version) on another computer and it has the same trouble. I have tried both firefox and konqueror. The website is www.anz.com.au. I suspect the security of the site is the problem but cannot be sure. Another thread on this list "[kde-freebsd] Konqueror very slow displaying some sites" puts it down to DNS. Any ideas? -Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 22:58:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368B816A420 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:58:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ross@axe.homelinux.net) Received: from smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A01B43D49 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:58:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ross@axe.homelinux.net) Received: from lucy.axe.homelinux.net ([82.36.124.90]) by smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:58:50 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.3] (purplehaze [192.168.0.3]) by lucy.axe.homelinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BED942AB9; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:58:03 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <42E41CFA.6040408@axe.homelinux.net> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:58:02 +0100 From: Ross Kendall Axe User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: piotrekk@excite.com References: <20050724140040.086CBBE107@xprdmailfe25.nwk.excite.com> In-Reply-To: <20050724140040.086CBBE107@xprdmailfe25.nwk.excite.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 OpenPGP: url=http://www.rossaxe.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/.pgpkey Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jul 2005 22:58:50.0287 (UTC) FILETIME=[417F7BF0:01C590A3] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, bsd@bathnetworks.com Subject: Re: howto export kde from freeBSD 5.4 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:58:07 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 PK wrote: > --- On Sun 07/24, Robert Slade < bsd@bathnetworks.com > wrote: > From: Robert Slade [mailto: bsd@bathnetworks.com] > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:41:16 +0000 > Subject: Re: howto export kde from freeBSD 5.4 ? > >> On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 13:30, PK wrote: >>> hi >>> >>> howto allow kde export from freeBSD 5.4 ? >>> >>> I mean to load KDE, for example with X-Win32 >>> >>> http://www.xwin32.com/en/products/ >>> >>> on the windows machine ? >>> >>> kind regards >>> piotr >> >> You are probably better off with VNC. Freebsd has a VNC Server in the >> ports and there are several free vnc clients for windows. >> >> Rob > > yes, I know VNC > > but VNC create all the time a new KDE session and I'd like to export already running KDE session. > I personally only use VNC to connect to MS-windows computers, and it simply exports the physical screen, which seems to be what you're after. I also use Cygwin's X server on my Windows machines but that's only suitable for either starting a new login session via XDM or running single applications through SSH's X11 forwarding, neither of which appears to be what you want. The problem is that you appear to want to attach an X client (an application, in this case KDE) to multiple X servers and X isn't really set up for that. VNC, which has it's client/server relationship the other way around, should be able to provide what you want more easily. HTH, Ross BTW, your mail was horribly mangled. I suggest you fix that if you want more replies. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC5Bz59bR4xmappRARAltHAKCL9afKTW/+OBbIaxulY9beZiErNgCgvCrf N5xLoKKKAtJ1G7fE0HwiB3A= =IuY8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 00:14:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7ED316A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:14:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: from excite.com (nn2.excitenetwork.com [207.159.120.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB4243D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:14:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: by xprdmailfe13.nwk.excite.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id BF6DDBF4D; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:14:33 -0400 (EDT) To: piotrekk@excite.com, keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Received: from [84.73.114.198] by xprdmailfe13.nwk.excite.com via HTTP; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:14:33 EST X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: ID = 2383e4973664c80f7198bf469d15c13b From: "PK" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: piotrekk@excite.com X-Mailer: PHP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050725001433.BF6DDBF4D@xprdmailfe13.nwk.excite.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:14:33 -0400 (EDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cannot install ntop under freeBSD 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: piotrekk@excite.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:14:44 -0000 hi I have exact the same problem and get the same errors. to clean a port, reinstall or upgrade ntop or rrdtool doesn't help. I've done: portupgrade -a -N -vu -R net/ntop and portupgrade -a -N -vu -r net/ntop did ports tree update again but still get errors ! on other hardware with fresh installation, I get the same errors. this is a horrible port BUG ! kind regards piotr --- On Sat 07/23, PK < piotrekk@excite.com > wrote: From: PK [mailto: piotrekk@excite.com] To: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 12:24:52 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: cannot install ntop under freeBSD 5.5
thanks

I've done:

portupgrade -a -N -vu -R net/ntop

and was running more then 4 days !
I've got following outputs:
---> Upgrade of multimedia/kdemultimedia3 ended at: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 18:03:03 +0200 (consumed 04:15:30)
---> Skipping 'x11/kde3' (kde-3.4.0) because a requisite package 'kdepim-3.4.0' (deskutils/kdepim3) failed (specify -k to force)
---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
- audio/artswrapper (artswrapper-1.2.1_1)
- misc/compat4x (compat4x-i386-5.3_2)
- security/cyrus-sasl2 (cyrus-sasl-2.1.21)
- databases/db4 (db4-4.0.14_1,1)
- net/sniffit (sniffit-0.3.7b_2)
- lang/python (python-2.4.1_1)
- archivers/zip (zip-2.3_2)
- misc/kdehier (kdehier-1.0_6)
- benchmarks/ttcp (ttcp-1.12)
- lang/perl5.8 (perl-5.8.7)
- net/rsync (rsync-2.6.5)
- devel/libtool15 (libtool-1.5.18)
- graphics/jpeg (jpeg-6b_3)
- graphics/png (png-1.2.8_2)
- www/tidy (tidy-20000804_2)
- databases/mysql41-client (mysql-client-4.1.12)
- archivers/unzip (unzip-5.52_1)
- java/javavmwrapper (javavmwrapper-2.0_5)
- textproc/expat2 (expat-1.95.8_3)
- lang/ruby18 (ruby-1.8.2_4)
- devel/cgilib (cgilib-0.5)
- security/p5-Authen-PAM (p5-Authen-PAM-0.14)
- misc/bsdiff (bsdiff-4.2)
- databases/ruby-bdb (ruby18-bdb4-0.5.3)
- sysutils/freebsd-sha256 (freebsd-sha256-20050310)
- net/openslp (openslp-1.2.1_1)
- devel/boost-python (boost-python-1.32.0_2)
- converters/libiconv (libiconv-1.9.2_1)
- print/gsfonts (gsfonts-8.11_2)
- databases/db42 (db42-4.2.52_4)
- security/p5-Net-SSLeay (p5-Net-SSLeay-1.25)
- sysutils/webmin (webmin-1.210_2)
- databases/ruby-bdb1 (ruby18-bdb1-0.2.2)
- security/freebsd-update (freebsd-update-1.6_1)
- print/libpaper (libpaper-1.1.14.3)
- devel/pcre (pcre-5.0)
- www/neon (neon-0.24.7)
- devel/m4 (m4-1.4.3)
- textproc/man2html (man2html-3.0.1_1)
- graphics/tiff (tiff-3.7.3)
- devel/autoconf213 (autoconf-2.13.000227_5)
- graphics/lcms (lcms-1.14,1)
- devel/libgnugetopt (libgnugetopt-1.2)
- mail/postfix (postfix-2.2.4_1,1)
- net/openldap22-client (openldap-client-2.2.27)
- sysutils/portupgrade (portupgrade-20041226_5)
- graphics/libmng (libmng-1.0.8)
- net/cvsup-without-gui (cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_2)
- palm/pilot-link (pilot-link-0.11.8_3)
- audio/libogg (libogg-1.1.2_1,3)
- audio/speex (speex-1.0.5,1)
- devel/imake-6 (imake-6.8.2)
- textproc/p5-XML-Parser (p5-XML-Parser-2.34_1)
- x11/xorg-documents (xorg-documents-6.8.2)
- devel/libusb (libusb-0.1.10a)
- audio/flac (flac-1.1.2)
- devel/automake14 (automake-1.4.6_2)
- security/nmap (nmap-3.81)
- graphics/jasper (jasper-1.701.0)
- devel/gettext (gettext-0.14.5)
- devel/popt (popt-1.7)
- devel/bison (bison-1.75_2)
- security/libgpg-error (libgpg-error-1.0_1)
+ security/libgcrypt (libgcrypt-1.2.1)
- shells/bash (bash-3.0.16_1)
- net/libpcap (libpcap-0.8.3)
- audio/libvorbis (libvorbis-1.1.1,3)
- multimedia/libtheora (libtheora-1.0.a4)
- devel/gmake (gmake-3.80_2)
- textproc/intltool (intltool-0.33)
- net/mDNSResponder (mDNSResponder-107.1_1)
- devel/autoconf259 (autoconf-2.59_2)
- net/samba-libsmbclient (samba-libsmbclient-3.0.14a_2)
- devel/automake19 (automake-1.9.5)
- audio/portaudio (portaudio-18.1_2)
- sysutils/logrotate (logrotate-3.7_4)
- www/apache2 (apache-2.0.54)
- lang/php4 (php4-4.4.0)
- textproc/php4-xml (php4-xml-4.4.0)
- databases/php4-mysql (php4-mysql-4.4.0)
- audio/cdparanoia (cdparanoia-3.9.8_7)
- devel/pkgconfig (pkgconfig-0.17.2)
+ devel/libidn (libidn-0.5.15)
- devel/libstatgrab (libstatgrab-0.11.1)
- math/fftw3 (fftw3-3.0.1_4)
- security/gnutls (gnutls-1.0.24_1)
- audio/libsndfile (libsndfile-1.0.11)
- print/freetype2 (freetype2-2.1.10)
+ devel/glib20 (glib-2.6.3_1)
- devel/desktop-file-utils (desktop-file-utils-0.10_2)
+ security/gnupg (gnupg-1.4.0_1)
- audio/libaudiofile (libaudiofile-0.2.6)
- accessibility/atk (atk-1.9.1)
- x11-fonts/fontconfig (fontconfig-2.2.3,1)
- textproc/libxml2 (libxml2-2.6.20)
- devel/libgsf (libgsf-1.11.1)
- audio/libsamplerate (libsamplerate-0.1.2)
- textproc/libxslt (libxslt-1.1.14)
- sysutils/freecolor (freecolor-0.8.4)
- dns/adns (adns-1.1)
- www/php4-session (php4-session-4.4.0)
- x11/xorg-libraries (xorg-libraries-6.8.2)
- graphics/libglut (libglut-6.0.1)
- x11-servers/xorg-fontserver (xorg-fontserver-6.8.2)
- misc/hicolor-icon-theme (hicolor-icon-theme-0.5)
- x11-fonts/libXft (libXft-2.1.7)
- x11-servers/xorg-server (xorg-server-6.8.2_3)
- audio/nas (nas-1.7)
- x11-servers/xorg-nestserver (xorg-nestserver-6.8.2)
- x11/xterm (xterm-202)
- x11-fonts/bitstream-vera (bitstream-vera-1.10_1)
- x11/xorg-clients (xorg-clients-6.8.2)
- x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-encodings (xorg-fonts-encodings-6.8.2)
- devel/apr-svn (apr-nothr-db4-1.0.1_1)
- devel/t1lib (t1lib-5.0.1,1)
- x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-type1 (xorg-fonts-type1-6.8.2)
- graphics/gd (gd-2.0.33_1,1)
- x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-cyrillic (xorg-fonts-cyrillic-6.8.2)
- x11-fonts/urwfonts (urwfonts-1.0)
- print/ghostscript-gnu (ghostscript-gnu-7.07_13)
- x11-toolkits/open-motif (open-motif-2.2.3_2)
- audio/jack (jackit-0.99.0)
- x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-75dpi (xorg-fonts-75dpi-6.8.2)
- security/gpgme (gpgme-1.0.2)
+ devel/subversion (subversion-1.1.3)
- x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-miscbitmaps (xorg-fonts-miscbitmaps-6.8.2)
+ print/cups-base (cups-base-1.1.23.0_3)
- x11-servers/xorg-vfbserver (xorg-vfbserver-6.8.2)
- x11-toolkits/qt33 (qt-3.3.4)
- net/cvsup (cvsup-16.1h_2)
- x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-truetype (xorg-fonts-truetype-6.8.2)
- x11-toolkits/pango (pango-1.8.1)
- x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-100dpi (xorg-fonts-100dpi-6.8.2)
- graphics/libart_lgpl2 (libart_lgpl2-2.3.17)
- graphics/dri (dri-6.2.1,2)
+ misc/shared-mime-info (shared-mime-info-0.15_9)
- net/rrdtool (rrdtool-1.2.10)
+ x11-toolkits/gtk20 (gtk-2.6.4_1)
- devel/nspr (nspr-4.6)
- misc/gnomehier (gnomehier-2.0_7)
- misc/gnomemimedata (gnomemimedata-2.4.2)
- x11-servers/xorg-printserver (xorg-printserver-6.8.2)
- x11/xorg (xorg-6.8.2)
- graphics/xpdf (xpdf-3.00_6)
- lang/tcl84 (tcl-8.4.11,1)
- x11-toolkits/tk84 (tk-8.4.11,2)
- textproc/wordnet (WordNet-2.0)
- net-mgmt/net-snmp (net-snmp-5.2.1.2)
- net/ethereal (ethereal-0.10.11_1)
- devel/libIDL (libIDL-0.8.5_1)
- devel/ORBit2 (ORBit2-2.12.2)
- devel/libbonobo (libbonobo-2.10.0)
- emulators/mtools (mtools-3.9.8_4)
- security/qca-tls (qca-tls-1.0_1)
- audio/taglib (taglib-1.3.1)
- devel/php4-pcre (php4-pcre-4.4.0)
- net/cacti (cacti-0.8.6f)
- devel/libtool13 (libtool-1.3.5_2)
- security/nessus-libraries (nessus-libraries-2.2.4)
- converters/fribidi (fribidi-0.10.4_1)
- archivers/rpm (rpm-3.0.6_10)
- audio/libmad (libmad-0.15.1b_1)
- emulators/linux_base-8 (linux_base-8-8.0_6)
- textproc/gdome2 (gdome2-0.8.1_3)
+ audio/arts (arts-1.4.0,1)
- security/nessus-libnasl (nessus-libnasl-2.2.4)
- textproc/wv2 (wv2-0.2.2_1)
- palm/libmal (libmal-0.40)
- textproc/linux-expat (linux-expat-1.95.5_3)
- devel/glib12 (glib-1.2.10_11)
- x11-toolkits/gtk12 (gtk-1.2.10_13)
- security/nmapfe (nmapfe-3.81)
- devel/fam (fam-2.6.9_6)
- x11-fonts/linux-fontconfig (linux-fontconfig-2.1_3)
- x11/linux-XFree86-libs (linux-XFree86-libs-4.3.99.902_3)
- databases/gdbm (gdbm-1.8.3_1)
- security/nessus (nessus-gtk2-2.2.4_1)
- java/linux-sun-jdk14 (linux-sun-jdk-1.4.2.08_2)
- net/ntop (ntop-3.1_1)
- java/jdk14 (jdk-1.4.2p7_1)
- graphics/OpenEXR (OpenEXR-1.2.1_1)
- net/linc (linc-1.0.3_3)
- devel/gconf2 (gconf2-2.10.1)
- devel/gnomevfs2 (gnomevfs2-2.10.1)
- www/mozilla (mozilla-1.7.8,2)
- databases/mysql41-server (mysql-server-4.1.12)
+ textproc/aspell (aspell-0.60.2)
+ www/opera (opera-7.54.20050131)
+ x11/kdelibs3 (kdelibs-3.4.0_1)
+ audio/akode-plugins-mpc (kdemultimedia-akode-plugins-mpc-3.4.0)
+ x11-clocks/kdetoys3 (kdetoys-3.4.0)
+ net/kdenetwork3 (kdenetwork-3.4.0)
+ editors/koffice-kde3 (koffice-1.3.5_2,1)
! deskutils/kdepim3 (kdepim-3.4.0) (fetch error)
! games/kdegames3 (kdegames-3.4.0) (fetch error)
+ audio/akode-plugins-oss (kdemultimedia-akode-plugins-oss-3.4.0)
! x11-wm/kompmgr (kdebase-kompmgr-3.4.0) (fetch error)
* x11/kdebase3 (kdebase-3.4.0_1)
* devel/kdesdk3 (kdesdk-3.4.0)
! accessibility/kdeaccessibility (kdeaccessibility-3.4.0) (fetch error)
+ audio/akode-plugins-mpeg (kdemultimedia-akode-plugins-mpeg-3.4.0)
+ audio/akode-plugins-resampler (kdemultimedia-akode-plugins-resampler-3.4.0)
* x11-themes/kdeartwork3 (kdeartwork-3.4.0)
+ audio/akode-plugins-xiph (kdemultimedia-akode-plugins-xiph-3.4.0)
+ graphics/kdegraphics3 (kdegraphics-3.4.0)
* misc/kdeutils3 (kdeutils-3.4.0)
+ sysutils/kdeadmin3 (kdeadmin-3.4.0)
+ www/kdewebdev (kdewebdev-3.4.0,2)
+ misc/kdeedu3 (kdeedu-3.4.0_1)
* devel/kdevelop (kdevelop-3.2.0)
+ audio/akode (kdemultimedia-akode-3.4.0)
+ multimedia/kdemultimedia3 (kdemultimedia-3.4.0)
* x11/kde3 (kde-3.4.0)
---> Packages processed: 26 done, 177 ignored, 6 skipped and 4 failed
---> Session ended at: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 18:03:26 +0200 (consumed 15:38:19)

now I'ww try:

portupgrade -a -N -vu -r net/ntop

and hope will be quicker !

greetings
piotr





--- On Wed 07/20, Giorgos Keramidas < keramida@ceid.upatras.gr > wrote:
From: Giorgos Keramidas [mailto: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr]
To: piotrekk@excite.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:46:30 +0300
Subject: Re: cannot install ntop under freeBSD 5.5

On 2005-07-20 19:10, PK wrote:
>
> hi
>
> did you install ntop on your freeBSD 5.4 without any errors ?
>
> under freeBSD 5.2.1 on the same hardware I didn't have any problems with ntop installation.
>
> I have cleand ntop & rrdtool ports, reinstalled again, but still get this errors:
>
> MP -MF .deps/rrdPlugin.Tpo -c rrdPlugin.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/rrdPlugin.lo
> rrdPlugin.c: In function `graphCounter':
> rrdPlugin.c:583: error: too few arguments to function `rrd_graph'
> rrdPlugin.c: In function `netflowSummary':
> rrdPlugin.c:728: error: too few arguments to function `rrd_graph'
> rrdPlugin.c: In function `graphSummary':
> rrdPlugin.c:926: error: too few arguments to function `rrd_graph'
> gmake[3]: *** [rrdPlugin.lo] Error 1
> gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins'
> gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins'
> gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop'
> gmake: *** [all] Error 2
> *** Error code 2
>
> Stop in /usr/ports/net/ntop.
> ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade26423.0 make
> ** Fix the problem and try again.
> ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed)
> ! net/ntop (ntop-3.1_1) (compiler error)
> ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed

Are you sure you have an up to date ports tree and there are no stale
"work" directories in it?

Have you installed the latest version of rrdtool?

Apparently, you are using portupgrade. Try updating both the
dependencies of ntop and the packages that depend on ntop:

# portupgrade -a -N -vu -R net/ntop
# portupgrade -a -N -vu -r net/ntop



_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!


_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 00:32:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3B616A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:32:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgerow@afflictions.org) Received: from pandora.afflictions.org (asylum.afflictions.org [64.7.134.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A581443D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:32:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgerow@afflictions.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pandora.afflictions.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B030D78C75 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:36:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pandora.afflictions.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pandora.afflictions.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30430-06 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:35:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dementia.afflictions.org (dementia.afflictions.org [172.19.206.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pandora.afflictions.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE5778C72 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:35:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by dementia.afflictions.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B244E33C64; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:32:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:32:38 -0400 From: Damian Gerow To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050725003238.GD2461@afflictions.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-GPG-Fingerprint: B3D7 D901 A53A 1A99 BFD6 E6DF 9F3B 742B C288 9CC9 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at pandora.afflictions.org Cc: Subject: Shell scripts, SSH sessions, and for loops, oh my! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:32:49 -0000 (I don't really know /where/ to ask this question. It's not particularly FreeBSD-centric, but the list has been good to me in the past, so hopefully nobody minds.) I'm trying to write a shell script that runs a for loop in an SSH session. Simply, I'm trying to do this: for HOST in `cat hostnames` ; do ssh ${HOST} "for PROCESS in 01 02 ; do echo '${PROCESS}' ; done" done But because this is run in a script, that gets translated to: for HOST in `cat hostnames` ; do ssh ${HOST} "for PROCESS in 01 02 ; do echo '' ; done" done Which most definitely is not what I want. I know a few ways around this -- expand the for loop, have a secondary script, create a secondary script on-the-fly, etc. -- but I'm curious to see if I can convince sh to *not* interpret ${PROCESS}. I've tried escaping it, I've tried a double-dollar, and I've tried escaping the double-dollar: none have worked. Does anyone have any ideas? - Damian P.S. Please reply privately as well to the list; thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 02:06:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1337616A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 02:06:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@auscert.org.au) Received: from titania.auscert.org.au (gw.auscert.org.au [203.5.112.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BB943D49 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 02:06:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@auscert.org.au) Received: from app.auscert.org.au (app [10.0.1.192]) by titania.auscert.org.au (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6P24dmG031098 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:04:39 +1000 (EST) Received: from app.auscert.org.au (localhost.auscert.org.au [127.0.0.1]) by app.auscert.org.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6P26QsZ094083 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:06:26 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@auscert.org.au) Message-Id: <200507250206.j6P26QsZ094083@app.auscert.org.au> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org from: freebsd-questions@auscert.org.au Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:06:26 +1000 Subject: How to create mtree files? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 02:06:29 -0000 Hi, I would like to use the mtree utility to confirm no changes have occurred to system files since 'make installworld', similar to that possible with 'mtree -f /cdrom/5.4-RELEASE/base/base.mtree' on a release installation. This would also give the added advantage of being able to determine the current buildlevel of an installed system, I believe. Is it possible/easy to create new mtree files after the buildworld or installworld process? I've looked at the Release Engineering docs but it seems more than what I'd like to do. I should add that I am running tripwire, but I really want to have a quick way to verify which files were part of which installworld. thanks, joel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 02:12:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008A416A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 02:12:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from heccjj1@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4EA43D49 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 02:12:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from heccjj1@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so448322nzo for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:12:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=br3nI1z+/knq055m6PQSQzop9C1fr8YckuGgdq35RcpbODbksfrfe7Cth+PBI6FUPzn/Xrq6/Se7EgDFng9KQJUtbLc24V2tP1TQJ0pAjLs9UOv+iwaQIGxGoyinCNR+Gt8DI7B9XFJ7uw8E8LPPc7qAM2cMs94pfUjlkZRKiEU= Received: by 10.36.3.9 with SMTP id 9mr1672119nzc; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:12:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.227.25 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:12:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6f9d8a505072419122024e5ab@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:12:11 +0800 From: he ccjj To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: very strange net problem in FreeBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: he ccjj List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 02:12:16 -0000 Hi,everyone. I met a very strange net problem in FreeBSD 5.4,it disturbed me very long time,i like freebsd very much,but if this problem can't be resolved,i have to give up it.:( The problem is just like this: My server box located in the education network at China(this is a special net work,mainly for the schools of China),with apache2+cronolog+mysql+pureftp in the same box.The users out of the education network frequently can't visit the www serve of my box,specially at morning(perhaps haven't visit after a long time?).But the users of education network seldom met this problem.Perhaps you will think about that is because of the education network,but the strange thing is that another box with Windows 2003 whith the same netwok condition just works fine,the users out of education network visit it very well.So I think the problem is just because of my box's OS! Firstly,I think perhaps it's because of the TTL of the two OS are different,so I change my FB's TTL to 255,but the problem occurs too.The users frequetly complain they can't visit! Because of cronolog?Apache?Or just because I used virtual website in Apache2? Or other reason lead to the router can't give a stable route?Why the windows OS with the same network condition work so well? Why? Help me please! I have met this problem about half an year! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 02:46:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED2E516A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 02:46:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECC743D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 02:46:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6P2kHU9008009 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:46:18 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050724192541.1a247b20@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:43:08 -0700 To: he ccjj , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <6f9d8a505072419122024e5ab@mail.gmail.com> References: <6f9d8a505072419122024e5ab@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: very strange net problem in FreeBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 02:46:20 -0000 At 07:12 PM 7/24/2005, he ccjj wrote: >Hi,everyone. >I met a very strange net problem in FreeBSD 5.4,it disturbed me very >long time,i like freebsd very much,but if this problem can't be >resolved,i have to give up it.:( > >The problem is just like this: >My server box located in the education network at China(this is a >special net work,mainly for the schools of China),with >apache2+cronolog+mysql+pureftp in the same box.The users out of the >education network frequently can't visit the www serve of my >box,specially at morning(perhaps haven't visit after a long time?).But >the users of education network seldom met this problem.Perhaps you >will think about that is because of the education network,but the >strange thing is that another box with Windows 2003 whith the same >netwok condition just works fine,the users out of education network >visit it very well.So I think the problem is just because of my box's >OS! I can't think of any reason why you would have this problem simply because you're using FreeBSD. The most likely cause is something (hard to say what without more details) is not configured properly on your FreeBSD system. >Firstly,I think perhaps it's because of the TTL of the two OS are >different,so I change my FB's TTL to 255,but the problem occurs >too.The users frequetly complain they can't visit! Do the people that have trouble reaching your FreeBSD system get any error messages? Timeouts? Assuming that the users who are having trouble are trying to connect to your system with a browser, are they also unable to ping your system? Is your system behind any kind of firewall or address translator? Does your system obtain it's IP address via DHCP? If so, is it unable to renew it's lease? (look in /var/db/dhclient.leases) Is your default route correct? Is it the same as the system that isn't having these problems? (assuming that both systems are on the same network) The more details you can give about your configuration, the easier it will be to help you figure out where the problem is. -Glenn >Because of cronolog?Apache?Or just because I used virtual website in >Apache2? Or other reason lead to the router can't give a stable >route?Why the windows OS with the same network condition work so well? >Why? >Help me please! >I have met this problem about half an year! >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 02:51:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162B016A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 02:51:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (sigma.octantis.com.au [207.44.188.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D36843D48 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 02:51:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 10629 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2005 12:51:11 +1000 Received: from andromeda.lef.com.au (HELO ?10.168.101.24?) (210.8.93.2) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 25 Jul 2005 12:51:11 +1000 Message-ID: <42E45395.2040608@meijome.net> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:51:01 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: kernel panic on boot - ServerWorks CSB6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 02:51:13 -0000 Hi all, I am trying to install 5.4 on a box that's been running Linux. It's a 2 year old 'Snap Appliance 4500' ( http://www.snapappliance.com/page.cfm?name=4500Main&nav=4500 ), with 4 x 120 GB EIDE, P4, 512 Mb. As soon as I try to load the kernel I get : --- (copied by hand ) Fatal trap 10: trace trap while in vm86 mode instruction pointer = 0xf000:0xf842 stack pointer = 0x0:0xff8 frame pointer = 0x0:0x0 code segment = base 0x330026, limit 0x1, type 0x9 = DPL 3, pres 1 def32 0, fram 0 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, vm86, IOPL=0 current process = 0 () trap number = 10 panic : trace trap uptime : 1 s ------------- Every time, the same pointers / segments. This happens right after the kernel memory addresses (data? segment? pls excuse my ignorance) show after pressing an option in the boot menu. I've been trying to install from a USB external CD ROM, with 5.4 release cd, iso, root@harlow.cse.buffalo.edu, Sun May 8 05:59:07 UTC 2005 (date showing from bootloader). - The same happens if I chose safe mode - The same happens if I disable dma from the boot loader prompt - I took one of the HDs out, installed in another pc, installed again as drive #1, same problem and panic. - I tried with only that one harddrive with FBSD 5.4 installed (all other HDs removed) - same panic - I tried with no HDs, just to see if the cd would boot - same panic. - I tried with 4.9 release CD, ISO from Monday oct 27 , 2003, same problem, slightly different addresses in panic (as expected, though quite similar): --- Fatal trap 10: trace trap while in vm86 mode instruction pointer = 0xf000: 0xf842 stack pointer = 0x0:0xff8 frame pointer = 0x0:0x0 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0x0, type 0x0 = DPL 0, pres 0, def32 0, gran 0 processor flags = interrupt enabled, vm86, IOPL=0 current process = idle interrupt mask = net tty bio cam trap number = 10 panic = trace trap uptime = 0 s ----- - booting with Linux Gentoo 5.0 universal cd works fine - booting with knoppix 3.8 works just fine. With this, I got some hardware info: lspci: --- 0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: ServerWorks GCNB-LE Host Bridge (rev 32) 0000:00:00.1 Host bridge: ServerWorks GCNB-LE Host Bridge 0000:00:04.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL (rev 27) 0000:00:05.0 IDE interface: Silicon Image, Inc. (formerly CMD Technology Inc) PCI0680 Ultra ATA-133 Host Controller (rev 02) 0000:00:0f.0 ISA bridge: ServerWorks CSB6 South Bridge (rev a0) 0000:00:0f.1 IDE interface: ServerWorks CSB6 RAID/IDE Controller (rev a0) 0000:00:0f.2 USB Controller: ServerWorks CSB6 OHCI USB Controller (rev 05) 0000:00:0f.3 Host bridge: ServerWorks GCLE-2 Host Bridge 0000:00:10.0 Host bridge: ServerWorks CIOB-E I/O Bridge with Gigabit Ethernet (rev 12) 0000:00:10.2 Host bridge: ServerWorks CIOB-E I/O Bridge with Gigabit Ethernet (rev 12) 0000:02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5704 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 02) 0000:02:00.1 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5704 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 02) ----- lspci -v : attached dmesg (linux knoppix 3.8): attached I'd appreaciate any pointers / suggestions / help. thanks in advance, Beto From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 03:08:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E6716A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:08:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (sigma.octantis.com.au [207.44.188.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B2B43D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:08:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 11057 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2005 13:08:07 +1000 Received: from andromeda.lef.com.au (HELO ?10.168.101.24?) (210.8.93.2) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 25 Jul 2005 13:08:07 +1000 Message-ID: <42E45792.4080906@meijome.net> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:08:02 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <42E45395.2040608@meijome.net> In-Reply-To: <42E45395.2040608@meijome.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: kernel panic on boot - ServerWorks CSB6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:08:09 -0000 Norberto Meijome wrote: > lspci -v : attached > dmesg (linux knoppix 3.8): attached > list server blocked the attachments. Please find them here: lspci -v : http://meijome.net/files/fbsd/arsmagna_lspci-v.txt dmesg (linux knoppix 3.8): http://meijome.net/files/fbsd/arsmagna_dmesg.txt thanks beto From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 03:29:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D11A16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:29:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jackqqpro@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB8C43D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:29:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jackqqpro@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so344699rne for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:29:49 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=focH3bREU2cRgy+v7C/i5eXTLEoHb32ipujp5PJo2PpYnMJX44kjmtd0R/qN32xjap2Qj+1mKvNR8e8mQYjpHlUcHI8YI3HKU0ONhsfdruP43wK7X6TOwdmq5wVs0DVrvdPXc245ldn/lupCLCNs342chI8WEcXiCttcHVZI4hY= Received: by 10.38.181.18 with SMTP id d18mr1104280rnf; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:29:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.104.31 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:29:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <890a507f0507242029b780f8a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:29:49 +0800 From: jackqq To: "Gary W. Swearingen" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: What does 'file a PR' mean? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jackqq List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:29:50 -0000 Thanks! :) But, to tell you the truth, I'm actually a newbie to FreeBSD, even *nix. I beg your pardon I don't quite understand what you mean by "filing a PR". On 7/24/05, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: >=20 > Good work. There ought to be a web page with little success stories > like yours, to incourage more people to look at the source. >=20 > I sure hope you'll file a PR about your addition to the file. >=20 --=20 jackqq :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 04:01:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8473B16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 04:01:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jackqqpro@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1723A43D48 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 04:01:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jackqqpro@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so348634rne for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:01:04 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=feUoBGharyvdtmOOj3pC1QhCCx45JtssfDr0h24b7qVISMlpDVIweYsmnLAfzCQ3d4l+roa575usieA7FXG2hD76iEzxxjJYtV/oPOlrGgwPaFFzttrbBkm+tZGesR4IQqPuS0JgCnACgSoPaVGJa0pEc6VBvUFHx+Rmg2kkpXs= Received: by 10.38.97.71 with SMTP id u71mr1326193rnb; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.104.31 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <890a507f050724210149606ed3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:01:04 +0800 From: jackqq To: "Gary W. Swearingen" In-Reply-To: <890a507f0507242029b780f8a@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <890a507f0507242029b780f8a@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: What does 'file a PR' mean? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jackqq List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 04:01:07 -0000 I've got the clue from Anthony's reply to my Holtek subject. Sorry for troubling you. Thanks! On 7/25/05, jackqq wrote: > Thanks! :) >=20 > But, to tell you the truth, I'm actually a newbie to FreeBSD, even > *nix. I beg your pardon I don't quite understand what you mean by > "filing a PR". --=20 jackqq :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 05:40:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1DB16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 05:40:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zickxell@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF9F43D48 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 05:40:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zickxell@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 50so846679wri for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:40:25 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:x-mailer:reply-to:x-priority:message-id:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=o18wMy+phVvV819qnc563s6Ykp+Lav2DgY4UfMnoNJKOlykTI2E3DrRnDwMsnNvgsRHxp63XMcczLQ+q9qhpaFWDYs7Nds/utdO8MxQMmhZN8apKrxP8ev3BnqfYSWqtzMMzwIIm/ZVC8oV1WgD8SK8SO8oOO4OFonU1MrsDwcw= Received: by 10.54.116.17 with SMTP id o17mr2076887wrc; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:40:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?80.237.53.26? ([80.237.53.26]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 24sm4260997wrl.2005.07.24.22.40.24; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:40:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:17:50 +0600 From: zick-1 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.1.33) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1414695455.20050725101750@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: question FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: zick-1 List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 05:40:26 -0000 Hello. I cannot install the application from a collection of ports. The mistake is given out ----Error code 1 -- Best regards, zick-1 mailto:zickxell@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 05:47:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B4116A420 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 05:47:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2706A43D5E for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 05:47:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.247.55] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id AD022A4A00A2; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:47:46 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6P5mLhe001265; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:48:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6P5mGHc001264; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:48:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: Damian Gerow References: <20050725003238.GD2461@afflictions.org> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:48:16 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20050725003238.GD2461@afflictions.org> (Damian Gerow's message of "Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:32:38 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shell scripts, SSH sessions, and for loops, oh my! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 05:47:47 -0000 Damian Gerow writes: > I'm trying to write a shell script that runs a for loop in an SSH session. > Simply, I'm trying to do this: > > for HOST in `cat hostnames` ; do > ssh ${HOST} "for PROCESS in 01 02 ; do echo '${PROCESS}' ; done" > done > > But because this is run in a script, that gets translated to: > > for HOST in `cat hostnames` ; do > ssh ${HOST} "for PROCESS in 01 02 ; do echo '' ; done" > done Here's a few clues (assuming you really want the single quotes in there): echo "THIS is SHELL: '\$SHELL'" echo "THIS is SHELL: '"'$SHELL'"'" echo 'THIS is SHELL: '\''$SHELL'\' which all give THIS is SHELL: '$SHELL' From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 08:45:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E2016A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:45:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-html@jonathan-glaschke.de) Received: from mail.liberty-hosting.de (mail.liberty-hosting.de [195.225.132.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A8243D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:45:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-html@jonathan-glaschke.de) Received: from mail.liberty-hosting.de ([195.225.132.203]) by localhost (liberty-mail [195.225.132.203]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66827-10 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:45:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jogla.fbsd (p50897775.dip.t-dialin.net [80.137.119.117]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.liberty-hosting.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E8F158953 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:45:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jogla.fbsd (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jogla.fbsd (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6PAjbDB000967 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:45:37 GMT (envelope-from jonathan@jogla.fbsd) Received: (from jonathan@localhost) by jogla.fbsd (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6PAjanY000966 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:45:36 GMT (envelope-from jonathan) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:45:36 +0000 From: Jonathan Glaschke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050725104536.GA943@jogla.fbsd> References: <1414695455.20050725101750@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1414695455.20050725101750@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.liberty-hosting.de Subject: Re: question FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:45:57 -0000 Hello, On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 10:17:50AM +0600, zick-1 wrote: > Hello. > > I cannot install the application from a collection of ports. > The mistake is given out ----Error code 1 > > > > -- > Best regards, > zick-1 mailto:zickxell@gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Please describe more details of you problem? It's much easier to you help you if you give up information about what you did exactly and if you give us the full ouput, not only "Error code 1". Greetings, Jonathan -- | /"\ ASCII Ribbon | Jonathan Glaschke - Lorenz-Görtz-Straße 71, | \ / Campaign Against | 41238 Mönchengladbach, Tel: 02166-265876 | X HTML In Mail | Mobil: 0162-3390789, ICQ: 231021883 | / \ And News | http://jonathan-glaschke.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 09:05:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D255816A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:05:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dvv@online.bg) Received: from gandalf.online.bg (gandalf.online.bg [217.75.128.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0E0043D48 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:05:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dvv@online.bg) Received: (qmail 18462 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2005 09:04:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.3?) (217.75.152.84) by gandalf.online.bg with SMTP; 25 Jul 2005 09:04:54 -0000 Message-ID: <42E4AB1A.9040006@online.bg> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:04:26 +0300 From: "dvv@online.bg" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, dvv@eprogress.bg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: PANIC on 6.0-BETA-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:05:03 -0000 Hello all! Yesterday I tried moving from RELENG_5 to RELENG_6 with a custom kernel. Used cvsup for getting files. Panic details follow at the end. Here is what I did: 1. make clean in /usr/src 2. removed stale obj files. 3. commented out the NO_INFO and other knobs in /etc/make.conf I had as I got error messages. 4. ran make buildworld 5. ran make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL. Got dependency error about IPDIVERT. It said IPFIREWALL was required so I commented it out. 6. removed /usr/obj/usr/srs/sys/MYKERNEL directory 7. ran make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL 8. ran make installkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL The system boots ok displaying copyright stuff, CPU features,ACPI stuff+links and goes booboo to here: nvidia:0 mem 0xde000000 - 0xdeffffff,0xd0000000-0xd7ffffff irq 16 at device 0.0 pci " Warning: Device driver " Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x480008 fault cod = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc07ff748 stack pointer = 0x28:0xc14207cc frame pointer = 0x28:0xc14207cc code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xffff, type 0x16 = DPL0, pres 1, def 32 1 gran 1 processor eflags =interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL=0 current process =0(swapper) trap number =12 panic: page fault uptime 1s The problem is I can't boot in 5.4-STABLE either At boot up I escape to loader prompt hit boot kernel.old Boot up and spits out Can't work out which disk we are booting from Guessed BIOS disk 0xffffffff not found by probes, defaulting to disk0 panic face: guard1 fail @ 0x67b44 from /usr/src/sys/i386/loader/../../common/modul.c:957 -> Press any key to reboot <- A little info about my system: 512MB RAM AMD Seprom 2500+ CPU 2 disk system - ad0 and ad1 - FreeBSD is on ad1 Have nvidia_load="YES" in loader.conf and snd_driver_all="YES" MYKERNEL is a generic kernel I have used for 5.x series with a little tweaks such as COMPAT_4x, device io and mem Sorry I can't post it but currently I do not have access to it. Can you advise of workarounds and get back my system running? I'm thinking of 6.0-beta1 disk2 as a start, compiling a 6.0 generic kernel. If that fails I'm considering the 6.0-beta1 disk1 as a second resort - hitting upgrade button. If that fails too - 5.4-based or some other live cd Thanks in advance! Have a nice day, Dimitar Vassilev From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 09:47:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D84A16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:47:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alexandre.delay@free.fr) Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr (postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067EF43D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:47:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alexandre.delay@free.fr) Received: from imp6-q.free.fr (imp6-q.free.fr [212.27.42.6]) by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E258CC15D for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:47:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: by imp6-q.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id 4FDCC260EC; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:36:09 +0200 (MEST) Received: from proxy8.sncf.fr (proxy8.sncf.fr [171.16.4.10]) by imp6-q.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:36:09 +0200 Message-ID: <1122284169.42e4b2893a1eb@imp6-q.free.fr> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:36:09 +0200 From: alexandre.delay@free.fr To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 171.16.4.10 Subject: resizing virtual disk (vn0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:47:37 -0000 hi, I am searching how to resize a virtual disk created with: # dd if=/dev/zero of=newimage bs=1k count=5k 5120+0 records in 5120+0 records out # vnconfig -s labels -c vn0 newimage # disklabel -r -w vn0 auto # newfs vn0c Warning: 2048 sector(s) in last cylinder unallocated /dev/vn0c: 10240 sectors in 3 cylinders of 1 tracks, 4096 sectors 5.0MB in 1 cyl groups (16 c/g, 32.00MB/g, 1280 i/g) super-block backups (for fsck -b #) at: 32 # mount /dev/vn0c /mnt When I decide to add more space to this virtual disk, I would like to be able to resize it. The only solution I have is creating an other virtual disk and copy files before deleting the first one. It takes a long time and two time more space than what I want during the process. any idea? Cheers Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 09:57:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA90A16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:57:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E3A43D4C for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:57:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6P9vjhG021799 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 02:57:46 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050725024754.106a6340@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 02:54:28 -0700 To: alexandre.delay@free.fr, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <1122284169.42e4b2893a1eb@imp6-q.free.fr> References: <1122284169.42e4b2893a1eb@imp6-q.free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: resizing virtual disk (vn0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:57:49 -0000 At 02:36 AM 7/25/2005, alexandre.delay@free.fr wrote: >hi, > >I am searching how to resize a virtual disk created with: > > > # dd if=/dev/zero of=newimage bs=1k count=5k > 5120+0 records in > 5120+0 records out > # vnconfig -s labels -c vn0 newimage > # disklabel -r -w vn0 auto > # newfs vn0c > Warning: 2048 sector(s) in last cylinder unallocated > /dev/vn0c: 10240 sectors in 3 cylinders of 1 tracks, 4096 sectors > 5.0MB in 1 cyl groups (16 c/g, 32.00MB/g, 1280 i/g) > super-block backups (for fsck -b #) at: > 32 > # mount /dev/vn0c /mnt > >When I decide to add more space to this virtual disk, I would like to be >able to >resize it. > >The only solution I have is creating an other virtual disk and copy files >before >deleting the first one. It takes a long time and two time more space than >what I >want during the process. > >any idea? You can create an empty file that's as big as the space you want to add (using dd). Then concatenate the empty file to the end of the file that contains the filesystem you need to make larger. Then use disklabel to edit the size of the partition you are using to reflect the added space. Then use growfs to expand the filesystem. Depending on how big the filesystem is, it will save a lot of time over doing a dump and restore. -Glenn >Cheers > >Alex > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 10:00:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C29C16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:00:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jackqqpro@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B205643D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:00:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jackqqpro@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so385406rne for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:00:38 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BHhJjiFDehrRPLIuqPCCKvX0EsI36P+pa0tpRm75pTypRO35IcT4mQ93nd3iIwC+gyshB+osv90WZhDWmOIIzD9kGE+hBfLShWQNfNY7I/a0mMzfsXo/urgMNx48/dfuEh6DnlZs39u6IJHOaB99Z55j2aVvkAffeuhPuYZowRI= Received: by 10.38.89.44 with SMTP id m44mr1220918rnb; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:00:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.104.31 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:00:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <890a507f05072503005c74fda6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:00:38 +0800 From: jackqq To: "Gary W. Swearingen" In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <890a507f050723004844ce572b@mail.gmail.com> <890a507f0507240310cfd8c38@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Holtek HT80232 NIC unrecognized on FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jackqq List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:00:39 -0000 Thank you! I've learnt how to use send-pr and posted the PR. On 7/24/05, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: > > I sure hope you'll file a PR about your addition to the file. >=20 --=20 jackqq :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 10:09:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9756116A420 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:09:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgerow@afflictions.org) Received: from pandora.afflictions.org (asylum.afflictions.org [64.7.134.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0782543D53 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:09:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgerow@afflictions.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pandora.afflictions.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C42278C78; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 06:12:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pandora.afflictions.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pandora.afflictions.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 78689-10; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 06:12:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dementia.afflictions.org (dementia.afflictions.org [172.19.206.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pandora.afflictions.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8E978C6D; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 06:12:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by dementia.afflictions.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 91E5233C64; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 06:09:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 06:09:02 -0400 From: Damian Gerow To: "Gary W. Swearingen" Message-ID: <20050725100902.GI2461@afflictions.org> References: <20050725003238.GD2461@afflictions.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: B3D7 D901 A53A 1A99 BFD6 E6DF 9F3B 742B C288 9CC9 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at pandora.afflictions.org Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shell scripts, SSH sessions, and for loops, oh my! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:09:18 -0000 Thus spake Gary W. Swearingen (garys@opusnet.com) [25/07/05 02:13]: : > I'm trying to write a shell script that runs a for loop in an SSH session. : > Simply, I'm trying to do this: : > : > for HOST in `cat hostnames` ; do : > ssh ${HOST} "for PROCESS in 01 02 ; do echo '${PROCESS}' ; done" : > done : > : > But because this is run in a script, that gets translated to: : > : > for HOST in `cat hostnames` ; do : > ssh ${HOST} "for PROCESS in 01 02 ; do echo '' ; done" : > done : : Here's a few clues (assuming you really want the single quotes in there): : : echo "THIS is SHELL: '\$SHELL'" : echo "THIS is SHELL: '"'$SHELL'"'" : echo 'THIS is SHELL: '\''$SHELL'\' : : which all give : : THIS is SHELL: '$SHELL' Yeah, but... The current shell still interprets $SHELL, and assigns it whatever local value it has. I don't want that. I want $SHELL to be evaluated by the remote system (the on to which I am establishing the SSH connection). To answer my own question: it looks like sh just isn't the right tool for the job. I'm going to have to either completely change my approach to the problem I'm trying to solve, or use Perl and Net::SSH (and given my problem, I'm tending towards the latter). - Damian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 10:10:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDF3F16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:10:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bt@ccgis.de) Received: from vogon.ccgis.de (vogon.ccgis.de [212.79.172.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8B943D67 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:10:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bt@ccgis.de) Received: from amavis by vogon.ccgis.de with virus-scanned (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Dx0HV-0001jg-00 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:33:57 +0200 Received: from center.sz ([192.168.1.20] helo=center.shared) by vogon.ccgis.de with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Dx0HE-0001j9-00; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:33:40 +0200 Received: from [192.168.2.66] (helo=[192.168.2.66]) by center.shared with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DwzuQ-0002wC-Mj; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:10:06 +0200 Message-ID: <42E4BB33.6060009@ccgis.de> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:13:07 +0200 From: Benjamin Thelen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "dvv@online.bg" References: <42E4AB1A.9040006@online.bg> In-Reply-To: <42E4AB1A.9040006@online.bg> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: AMaViS-ng at Geo-Consortium Bonn Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, dvv@eprogress.bg Subject: Re: PANIC on 6.0-BETA-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:10:56 -0000 dvv@online.bg wrote: > Hello all! > Yesterday I tried moving from RELENG_5 to RELENG_6 with a custom kernel. > Used cvsup for getting files. > Panic details follow at the end. > Here is what I did: > 1. make clean in /usr/src > 2. removed stale obj files. > 3. commented out the NO_INFO and other knobs in /etc/make.conf I had as > I got error messages. > 4. ran make buildworld > 5. ran make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL. Got dependency error about > IPDIVERT. It said IPFIREWALL was required so I commented it out. > 6. removed /usr/obj/usr/srs/sys/MYKERNEL directory > 7. ran make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL > 8. ran make installkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL > > The system boots ok displaying copyright stuff, CPU features,ACPI > stuff+links and goes booboo to here: > > nvidia:0 mem 0xde000000 - > 0xdeffffff,0xd0000000-0xd7ffffff irq 16 at device 0.0 pci " > > Warning: Device driver " > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > fault virtual address = 0x480008 > fault cod = supervisor read, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc07ff748 > stack pointer = 0x28:0xc14207cc > frame pointer = 0x28:0xc14207cc > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xffff, type 0x16 > = DPL0, pres 1, def 32 1 gran 1 > processor eflags =interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL=0 > current process =0(swapper) > trap number =12 > panic: page fault > uptime 1s > > The problem is I can't boot in 5.4-STABLE either > At boot up I escape to loader prompt hit boot kernel.old > Boot up and spits out > Can't work out which disk we are booting from > Guessed BIOS disk 0xffffffff not found by probes, defaulting to disk0 > panic face: guard1 fail @ 0x67b44 from > /usr/src/sys/i386/loader/../../common/modul.c:957 > -> Press any key to reboot <- > > A little info about my system: > 512MB RAM > AMD Seprom 2500+ CPU > 2 disk system - ad0 and ad1 - FreeBSD is on ad1 > Have nvidia_load="YES" in loader.conf and snd_driver_all="YES" > MYKERNEL is a generic kernel I have used for 5.x series with a little > tweaks such as COMPAT_4x, device io and mem > Sorry I can't post it but currently I do not have access to it. > Can you advise of workarounds and get back my system running? > I'm thinking of 6.0-beta1 disk2 as a start, compiling a 6.0 generic kernel. > If that fails I'm considering the 6.0-beta1 disk1 as a second resort - > hitting upgrade button. > If that fails too - 5.4-based or some other live cd > > Thanks in advance! > Have a nice day, > Dimitar Vassilev > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hi, Just a short shot, as the error message you've posted is not really talkative, but 'Warning: Device driver "' and 'nvidia_load="YES" in loader.conf' leads me to the assumption, that your problem is the nvidia module. Try removing _everything_ that is non-standard, e.g. everything what loads additional modules! Ben From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 10:11:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC97C16A420 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:11:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from omar@biglist.com) Received: from biglist.com (biglist.com [216.223.208.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2372543D48 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:11:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from omar@biglist.com) Received: (qmail 99108 invoked by uid 601); 25 Jul 2005 10:11:47 -0000 Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 06:11:47 -0400 From: Omar Thameen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050725101147.GA79920@biglist.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: bsdlabel and moving to a bigger drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:11:49 -0000 I'm trying to transfer a 5.4 box from one drive to another bigger one. I've added the second drive, partitioned and labeled it using sysinstall's "post-install configuration of FreeBSD" menu item, created new partitions with better space allocation, then dumped/restored the filesystems. I had sysinstall create all the filesystems on /mnt so I could do the dump/restore. Because there was no / partition (it was "/mnt" on the new drive), sysinstall did not create an ad2s1a partition. The / partition on the new drive is thus ad2s1d. After the dump/restore, I edited /etc/fstab in preparation for putting the new drive on the primary IDE controller and the original drive on the secondary IDE controller. On reboot, I had to tell the boot process to boot from ad0s1d (the new drive is now ad0) via 0:ad(0,d)/boot/loader at the boot prompt. That works fine, but I'd like to avoid having to type that in every time. I figured I could just use bsdlabel to rename the 'd' partition to 'a' so it can be booted from, but here's my first problem: bsdlabel -e ad0s1 doesn't save my changes. I've tried this after a default boot and in single-user mode. Do I need to boot from floppy/cd to accomplish this, or is there something else I'm missing? While I'm on the boot kick, here's my next question. I tried booting from the original drive (now on the 2nd IDE controller) via: 1:ad(0,a)/boot/loader at the boot prompt, but it won't boot because it's looking for the kernel on ad0s1d. The only place I can think it would be getting that information from is /etc/fstab the IDE drive on the primary controller. I thought that if I booted from the IDE drive on the secondary controller, the whole process would proceed by reading files off of that drive - but do the boot files always look on the primary drive? Omar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 10:26:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B001316A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:26:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779EA43D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:26:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6PAQZWB022312 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:26:35 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050725031219.0feaeeb0@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:23:17 -0700 To: alexandre.delay@free.fr, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <1122284169.42e4b2893a1eb@imp6-q.free.fr> References: <1122284169.42e4b2893a1eb@imp6-q.free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: resizing virtual disk (vn0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:26:39 -0000 At 02:36 AM 7/25/2005, alexandre.delay@free.fr wrote: >hi, > >I am searching how to resize a virtual disk created with: > > > # dd if=/dev/zero of=newimage bs=1k count=5k > 5120+0 records in > 5120+0 records out > # vnconfig -s labels -c vn0 newimage > # disklabel -r -w vn0 auto > # newfs vn0c > Warning: 2048 sector(s) in last cylinder unallocated > /dev/vn0c: 10240 sectors in 3 cylinders of 1 tracks, 4096 sectors > 5.0MB in 1 cyl groups (16 c/g, 32.00MB/g, 1280 i/g) > super-block backups (for fsck -b #) at: > 32 > # mount /dev/vn0c /mnt > >When I decide to add more space to this virtual disk, I would like to be >able to >resize it. > >The only solution I have is creating an other virtual disk and copy files >before >deleting the first one. It takes a long time and two time more space than >what I >want during the process. > >any idea? Here's a set of step by step instructions to go along with my previous reply: adding space to a vn backed filesystem unmount the file system to be enlarged # umount /foo unconfigure the vn node that needs to be enlarged # vnconfig -u /dev/vn0 *** MAKE A BACKUP of the file that was attached to the vn device # cp /path/to/oldfile /path/to/backup create a new file that's as big as the amount of space you want to add # dd if=/dev/zero of=addfile count=2000000 (2000000 blocks is 1GB) cat the original file and the new space into a new file # cat origfile addfile > newfile associate the new file with the vn device # vnconfig -u /dev/vn0 # vnconfig -s labels -c /dev/vn0 /path/to/newfile use disklabel to increase the size of the "disk" (you'll need to do a bit of math to get the right numbers, but make sure you edit the size of the disk and the size of the "c" partition) # disklabel -r -e vn0 now use growfs to enlarge the actual filesystem (size for growfs should match the size of the "c" partition when you edited the disklabel) # growfs -s 4000000 /dev/vn0c mount the newly enlarged filesystem # mount /dev/vn0c /some/path and that's it. -Glenn >Cheers > >Alex > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 10:35:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B3716A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:35:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CB143D53 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:35:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6PAZCFq022449 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:35:12 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050725032448.03874610@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:31:54 -0700 To: Omar Thameen , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <20050725101147.GA79920@biglist.com> References: <20050725101147.GA79920@biglist.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: bsdlabel and moving to a bigger drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:35:13 -0000 At 03:11 AM 7/25/2005, Omar Thameen wrote: >I'm trying to transfer a 5.4 box from one drive to another bigger one. >I've added the second drive, partitioned and labeled it using >sysinstall's "post-install configuration of FreeBSD" menu item, >created new partitions with better space allocation, then dumped/restored >the filesystems. > >I had sysinstall create all the filesystems on /mnt so I could do >the dump/restore. Because there was no / partition (it was "/mnt" >on the new drive), sysinstall did not create an ad2s1a partition. >The / partition on the new drive is thus ad2s1d. > >After the dump/restore, I edited /etc/fstab in preparation for putting >the new drive on the primary IDE controller and the original drive on >the secondary IDE controller. On reboot, I had to tell the boot >process to boot from ad0s1d (the new drive is now ad0) via >0:ad(0,d)/boot/loader >at the boot prompt. > >That works fine, but I'd like to avoid having to type that in every >time. I figured I could just use bsdlabel to rename the 'd' partition >to 'a' so it can be booted from, but here's my first problem: >bsdlabel -e ad0s1 >doesn't save my changes. I've tried this after a default boot and >in single-user mode. Do I need to boot from floppy/cd to accomplish >this, or is there something else I'm missing? The bootstrap code only knows how to find the 'a' partition. According to the boot(8) man page, the only way to avoid manual intervention at boot time is to have the 'a' partition as / -Glenn >While I'm on the boot kick, here's my next question. I tried booting >from the original drive (now on the 2nd IDE controller) via: >1:ad(0,a)/boot/loader >at the boot prompt, but it won't boot because it's looking for the >kernel on ad0s1d. The only place I can think it would be getting >that information from is /etc/fstab the IDE drive on the primary >controller. I thought that if I booted from the IDE drive on >the secondary controller, the whole process would proceed by reading >files off of that drive - but do the boot files always look on >the primary drive? > >Omar > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 11:13:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C46316A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:13:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsdbeni@spymac.com) Received: from guri.is.scarlet.be (guri.is.scarlet.be [193.74.71.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD3843D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:13:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsdbeni@spymac.com) Received: from (ip-213-49-96-195.dsl.scarlet.be [213.49.96.195]) by guri.is.scarlet.be with ESMTP id j6PBDkU27226 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:13:46 +0200 From: FreeBsdBeni To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:13:02 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1548848.g8qSxzL7Di"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200507251313.32343.freebsdbeni@spymac.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD is Very slow to load some sites X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:13:49 -0000 --nextPart1548848.g8qSxzL7Di Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 25 July 2005 00:57, Galdes, Andrew (ERHS) wrote: > Hello All, > > Freebsd seems to take a long time (up to ten minutes) to load some web > sites. When i use Linux or Windows it seems to load at normal speed. I ha= ve > installed Freebsd (same version) on another computer and it has the same > trouble. I have tried both firefox and konqueror. I'm having no problems here to access the site. Using Firefox 1.0.6 (less t= han=20 1 min to show the page) and Konqueror 3.4.1 (a bit over 1 min) under=20 5.4-REL-p5. But the site uses stylesheets and (java)scripts/applets. Maybe= =20 thats the problem ? Beni. --nextPart1548848.g8qSxzL7Di Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC5MlY98oeEzEDrEcRAk0YAKCkvrAVZ+zcPsTDuRP0tO3FbkGckgCeLDlf A7s9wWyA+bkDtHnqHxle7JM= =pw76 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1548848.g8qSxzL7Di-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 12:03:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C69616A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:03:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: from excite.com (nn7.excitenetwork.com [207.159.120.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCAB43D67 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:03:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: by xprdmailfe10.nwk.excite.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 1186D3CE9; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:03:28 -0400 (EDT) To: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr, piotrekk@excite.com Received: from [84.73.114.198] by xprdmailfe10.nwk.excite.com via HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:03:27 EST X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: ID = 2383e4973664c80f7198bf469d15c13b From: "PK" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: piotrekk@excite.com X-Mailer: PHP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050725120328.1186D3CE9@xprdmailfe10.nwk.excite.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:03:28 -0400 (EDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cannot install ntop under freeBSD 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: piotrekk@excite.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:03:31 -0000 hi It must be a BUG in the freeBSD 5.4 ntop port ! greetings Piotr --- On Mon 07/25, Giorgos Keramidas < keramida@ceid.upatras.gr > wrote: From: Giorgos Keramidas [mailto: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr] To: piotrekk@excite.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:20:05 +0300 Subject: Re: cannot install ntop under freeBSD 5.5 On 2005-07-24 20:14, PK wrote:
>
> hi
>
> I have exact the same problem and get the same errors.
>
> to clean a port, reinstall or upgrade ntop or rrdtool doesn't help.

Strange. I did build ntop on 6.0-CURRENT a few days before the switch
to 7.0-CURRENT was made. I haven't tried to build ntop on 5.X though,
so this may be the problem.

_______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 12:20:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D154F16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:20:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml.freebsd.questions@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E303F43D53 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:20:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml.freebsd.questions@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so875296wri for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 05:20:15 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=bBrwfzpvq1TWM4JAV9Oi1U+2Kvx9xYwV2/ce8YUknj0kSuRvtL02j/xTA0rV7jXMJh2tK5qV+V3YBR+dY9BYlUFKzgXMYbonRpSSjp04SxcCE6t1eluNxoAG3NCvKiGdfYjoD3/Tl1Hmkmt7uB64mNqMU1+to6xVCi0LVud152c= Received: by 10.54.52.55 with SMTP id z55mr2175550wrz; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 05:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.76.12 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 05:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <10549b08050725052035362ea8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:20:14 -0400 From: FreeBSD Questions To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Dump/Tape block question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:20:16 -0000 Sorry if this is a repeat. I posted this on the 21st and never saw it show= up in the mailing list, so I'm assuming nobody ever received it. I have a question about dump and tape blocks. When I do backups, dump tells me it uses a certain number of blocks for that particular backup. I explicitly set my block size to 65K when I do a dump. When I read the SCSI or hardware block location on the tape after the dump, it's nowhere near the same number as what dump said it used. How big is each block? I'd like to know about where on the tape I am when I do an 'mt rdhpos' command (but I don't know how to determine the reported block size), and I'd like to be able to calculate how much data was written for each backup based on the number of blocks dumped (I assume these blocks are the size I specify on the dump command line). In fact, how can I calculate how many blocks my tape can hold? (i.e. What is the biggest block number an 'mt rdhpos' or 'mt rdspos' will report for my tape?) Of course, an obvious solution to the last question is to write enough data to fill the tape and then check the output of 'mt rdhpos'. I'd rather not spend the hours needed and the unneeded wear on the tape to figure that out. Kevin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 08:25:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B2516A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:25:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zmail84@citromail.hu) Received: from web05.citromail.hu (fwall1.citromail.hu [193.202.83.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7449243D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:25:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zmail84@citromail.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost.citromail.hu [127.0.0.1]) by web05.citromail.hu (Vip MTA) with SMTP id 39F004C39C for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:25:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 213.163.51.189 [213.163.51.189] by mail05.citromail.hu with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:25:02 +0200 From: "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?B=F6lcskei_Zolt=E1n?=" To: Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:25:02 +0200 Errors-To: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: CitroMail v.2.0 X-HTTP-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1) X-Originating-Ip: [213.163.51.189] X-Mailer: Vip Mailer v1.00 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20050725082503.39F004C39C@web05.citromail.hu> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:18:30 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:25:03 -0000 Hi!I don't have an internet connection at home so i wanna know if there&nbs= p;are any places where i can download packages/distfiles with dependencies = recursively/together [e.g.: a tarred file or s.g. like that which includes = the package and all of it's dependencies](because downloading them one-by-o= ne is quite annoying)??? --------------------------------------------------------------------- CitroMail.hu - Vid=E1m, k=E9nyelmes, gyors, ingyenes levelez=F5 rendszer! Egy helyen el=E9rheted r=E9gi c=EDmeidre =E9rkez=F5 leveleidet,automatikusa= n tov=E1bb=EDthatod ide =E9rkez=F5 leveleidet m=E1s c=EDmre! 20 Megabyte t=E1rhely, melyet ak=E1rmekkor=E1ra b=F5v=EDthetsz! Az SMS =E9rtes=EDt=E9s seg=EDts=E9g=E9vel pedig mindig =E9rtes=FClsz, ha fo= ntos levelet kapsz!=20 Pr=F3b=E1ld ki most a Citrot! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 12:57:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08BCE16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:57:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5986F43D5F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:57:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6PCvkUk025375 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 05:57:47 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050725054513.18ed6a60@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 05:54:26 -0700 To: piotrekk@excite.com, keramida@ceid.upatras.gr, piotrekk@excite.com From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <20050725120328.1186D3CE9@xprdmailfe10.nwk.excite.com> References: <20050725120328.1186D3CE9@xprdmailfe10.nwk.excite.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:19:24 +0000 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cannot install ntop under freeBSD 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:57:54 -0000 At 05:03 AM 7/25/2005, PK wrote: >hi > >It must be a BUG in the freeBSD 5.4 ntop port ! > >greetings >Piotr The problem you are seeing is because the rrd plugin that's part of ntop is supplying 5 argument to the rrd_graph() function. Which is ok for the versions of rrd that are bundled with ntop. However, if you have the rrdtools port installed, it's version of rrd_graph() is expecting 8 arguments. The error you are getting is because the prototype for rrd_graph() that comes with rrdtools does not match how ntop is calling it. To get around the problem, you can remove the rrdtool port, and then ntop should build without errors. If you're using rrdtool you can probably reinstall it once ntop is built. That may cause a problem if rrdtool installs any shared libraries that ntop uses. -Glenn > --- On Mon 07/25, Giorgos Keramidas < keramida@ceid.upatras.gr > wrote: >From: Giorgos Keramidas [mailto: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr] >To: piotrekk@excite.com > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:20:05 +0300 >Subject: Re: cannot install ntop under freeBSD 5.5 > >On 2005-07-24 20:14, PK wrote:
>
> >hi
>
> I have exact the same problem and get the same >errors.
>
> to clean a port, reinstall or upgrade ntop or rrdtool >doesn't help.

Strange. I did build ntop on 6.0-CURRENT a few days >before the switch
to 7.0-CURRENT was made. I haven't tried to build >ntop on 5.X though,
so this may be the problem.

> >_______________________________________________ >Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com >The most personalized portal on the Web! > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 14:01:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C029016A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:01:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from delta.ski@verizon.net) Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net (vms046pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7753043D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:01:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from delta.ski@verizon.net) Received: from [192.168.1.47] ([71.114.166.191]) by vms046.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0IK600464SAGIBMA@vms046.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:01:29 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:02:22 -0500 From: delta.ski@verizon.net In-reply-to: <1414695455.20050725101750@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <200507250902.22785.delta.ski@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <1414695455.20050725101750@gmail.com> User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 Subject: Re: question FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:01:29 -0000 On Sunday 24 July 2005 11:17 pm, zick-1 wrote: > Hello. > > I cannot install the application from a collection of ports. > The mistake is given out ----Error code 1 This is a common error message reflecting a "user" trying to install a port or package. Try "root" prior to the install attempt, this should work better. There are many tutorials and documentation that would help in this matter. A simple google search will also assist. FreeBSD does have a high learning curve that demands effort on your part. Read, Learn, Command. Don From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 14:10:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECC216A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:10:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9858043D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:10:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.247.55] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A29D2C380110; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:09:33 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6PEArjS008784; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:10:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6PEAloq008783; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:10:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: Damian Gerow References: <20050725003238.GD2461@afflictions.org> <20050725100902.GI2461@afflictions.org> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:10:47 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20050725100902.GI2461@afflictions.org> (Damian Gerow's message of "Mon, 25 Jul 2005 06:09:02 -0400") Message-ID: <7vy87vkmc8.87v@mail.opusnet.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Total weight between 10 and 14. X-Spam-Tests-Failed: SPAMDOMAINS, SPFf, WEIGHT10 [11] Cc: questions@freebsd.org, "Gary W. Swearingen" Subject: Re: Shell scripts, SSH sessions, and for loops, oh my! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:10:17 -0000 Damian Gerow writes: > Yeah, but... > > The current shell still interprets $SHELL, and assigns it whatever local > value it has. I don't want that. I want $SHELL to be evaluated by the > remote system (the on to which I am establishing the SSH connection). No, the whole object of my examples was to pass "$SHELL" to the echo command without interpretation by the shell -- which they did. > > To answer my own question: it looks like sh just isn't the right tool for > the job. I'm going to have to either completely change my approach to the > problem I'm trying to solve, or use Perl and Net::SSH (and given my problem, > I'm tending towards the latter). Standard shells can do almost anything; just awkwardly and in hard-to-decipher style. This should demonstrate better. I've got two scripts: -- tryit: #!/bin/sh PROCESS=process export PROCESS ssh "for PROCESS in 01 02 ; do echo \${PROCESS} ; done" -- ssh: #!/bin/sh PROCESS=newproc echo "From 'ssh': '$@'" eval "$@" -- running tryit: $ temptry >From 'ssh': 'for PROCESS in 01 02 ; do echo ${PROCESS} ; done' 01 02 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 14:36:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E08516A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:36:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from darryl@osborne-ind.com) Received: from ws1.cnweb.com (ws1.cnweb.com [207.91.1.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566EA43D48 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:36:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from darryl@osborne-ind.com) Received: (qmail 423 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2005 09:36:52 -0500 Received: from p245n23.ruraltel.net (HELO darryl) (24.225.23.245) by gerberhastings.com with SMTP; 25 Jul 2005 09:36:52 -0500 From: "Darryl Hoar" To: Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:37:02 -0500 Message-ID: <005601c59126$53c98e30$0701a8c0@darryl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Subject: gcc34 build error on Freebsd 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: darryl@osborne-ind.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:36:54 -0000 Greetings, I have 5.1 running on my machine. I installed cvsup and upgraded my ports with it. I then went into /usr/ports/databases/firebird-client and did a make install. Of course it installed several other dependencies when I did that. One thing is was trying to build/install was gcc34. The following error was generated and the entire process came to a halt. ../.././..//gcc-3.4-20050719/libiberty/fibheap.c:395: warning: implicit declaration of function `memset' gmake[2]: *** [fibheap.o] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc34/work/build/i386-portbld-freebsd5.1/libiberty' gmake[1]: *** [all-target-libiberty] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc34/work/build' gmake: *** [bootstrap-lean] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/gcc34. *** Error code 1 I google'd and searched the freebsd website/mailing list, FAQ, but didn't find an answer to this problem. Anybody have an pointers/help so I can get on with the install ? thanks in advance, Darryl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 14:51:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456B016A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:51:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from darom@filmkern.com) Received: from mail.filmkern.com (mail.filmkern.com [206.169.45.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD84343D4C for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:51:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from darom@filmkern.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.filmkern.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E40629E86; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:51:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.filmkern.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 17991-01; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:51:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.filmkern.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.filmkern.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235C929428; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:51:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 206.169.45.183 (SquirrelMail authenticated user darom@filmkern.com) by mail.filmkern.com with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:51:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <35847.206.169.45.183.1122303103.squirrel@mail.filmkern.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:51:43 -0700 (PDT) From: "Denis R." To: galdes.andrew@saugov.sa.gov.au User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at filmkern.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: re: FreeBSD is Very slow to load some sites X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:51:44 -0000 Hey Andrew, If you suspect it is your DNS, just put the IP address of your site in the browser: 202.2.59.40 or 202.2.56.40 and see if the same thing happens. But like someone else noticed, it might be page related (java etc) that the Linux browser is having problems with. Regards! Denis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freebsd seems to take a long time (up to ten minutes) to load some web sites. When i use Linux or Windows it seems to load at normal speed. I have installed Freebsd (same version) on another computer and it has the same trouble. I have tried both firefox and konqueror. The website is www.anz.com.au. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 14:52:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B0D16A43C for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:52:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1395043D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:52:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.247.55] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id AC9866650032; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:52:08 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6PErZdW009370; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:53:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6PErT7w009369; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:53:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: FreeBSD Questions References: <10549b08050725052035362ea8@mail.gmail.com> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:53:29 -0700 In-Reply-To: <10549b08050725052035362ea8@mail.gmail.com> (FreeBSD Questions's message of "Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:20:14 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dump/Tape block question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:52:59 -0000 FreeBSD Questions writes: > How big is each block? I'd like to know about where on the tape I am > when I do an 'mt rdhpos' command (but I don't know how to determine > the reported block size), and I'd like to be able to calculate how > much data was written for each backup based on the number of blocks > dumped (I assume these blocks are the size I specify on the dump > command line). In fact, how can I calculate how many blocks my tape > can hold? (i.e. What is the biggest block number an 'mt rdhpos' or > 'mt rdspos' will report for my tape?) It'd be real useful to have some "intro to tapes and blocks", huh? I recently did some testing on my DDS-II drive to try to figure it out, somewhat. You needn't go to the end of the tape to figure the "tape block size"; take the number of bytes written and divide by the rdhpos number. If I "cat" to the drive, the tape records seem to be 4096 bytes. If I use "dd", the tape records seem to be the "bs" size. The "rdspos" and "rdhpos" are almost the same, with "rdspos" probably counting an extra block for each "file mark". Those "rdxpos" counts for a given file are the same whether tape-drive compression is on or off, meaning that with compression on, you can't well-predict what the "rdhpos" would be at the end of the tape, or what percentage of the tape you've used. :( I didn't try "tar" blocking, though the new "f" tar works fine to a disk file or piped to another tar. Backup duration (on my fast sys, anyway) is determined by how much tape is used, not on whether drive or CPU has to do on-the-fly compression or not. Except that (based on one test) it seemed to take the drive longer to write a compressed file with compression on, than with compression off. So I'll be compressing on the CPU and turning drive compression off (which has the side benefit of giving more useful "rdhpos" numbers). Suggestion: write an "mt" command that intercepts "mt erase" without a "0" argument, if you don't want to wait an hour or more for the tape to be fully erased. (You can't even kill -9 "mt".) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 14:53:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE6C16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:53:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from magalhj@yahoo.com.br) Received: from web31614.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31614.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.160]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EED943D48 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:53:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from magalhj@yahoo.com.br) Received: (qmail 57419 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Jul 2005 14:53:56 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.br; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=1kKlGcBxO7gZhuAQ6De5q8dV9uzy8wK+RotRaaZ98rH0hRnHCDzFIEUNOQGfgFi/p65X/olQ1r0DFe1+7IzFRn/C86UyZeIvyX7i3eoihlqT2Pmgr0N0QIgy6SFRQFNcxBlp7wHv4cjxy0Uh5iHUdvNIq+PF9xGJ/sU9aFjClIs= ; Message-ID: <20050725145356.57417.qmail@web31614.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.216.238.36] by web31614.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:53:56 ART Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:53:56 -0300 (ART) From: Aguiar Magalhaes To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Update 5.3 Release to 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:53:58 -0000 Hi list, I´m using FreeBSD 5.3 - Release in servers (Postfix, Apache, pf, squid, etc) I´d like to update for 5.4, but I don´t know how to do. Is it safe ? Aguiar _______________________________________________________ Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador agora! http://br.acesso.yahoo.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 14:58:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9884916A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:58:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob89@eng.ufl.edu) Received: from scorpion.eng.ufl.edu (scorpion.eng.ufl.edu [128.227.116.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 32D7643D48 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:58:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob89@eng.ufl.edu) Received: (qmail 7598 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2005 14:58:44 -0000 Received: from scanner.engnet.ufl.edu (128.227.152.221) by scorpion.eng.ufl.edu with SMTP; 25 Jul 2005 14:58:44 -0000 From: Bob Johnson Organization: UF College of Engineering Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:58:43 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline To: Undisclosed.Recipients: ; Message-Id: <200507251058.44109.bob89@eng.ufl.edu> Subject: RE: FreeBSD is Very slow to load some sites > X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Galdes, Andrew \(ERHS\)" List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:58:46 -0000 > From: "Galdes, Andrew (ERHS)" > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:27:37 +0930 > Subject: FreeBSD is Very slow to load some sites > > Hello All, > > Freebsd seems to take a long time (up to ten minutes) to load some web > sites. When i use Linux or Windows it seems to load at normal speed. I have > installed Freebsd (same version) on another computer and it has the same > trouble. I have tried both firefox and konqueror. > > The website is www.anz.com.au. I suspect the security of the site is the > problem but cannot be sure. It seems to be some sort of DNS issue, but I don't know exactly what. An HTTP connection to www.anz.com.au takes about 45 seconds to establish, regardless of the browser. E.g. time telnet www.anz.com.au 80 Trying 202.2.59.40... Connected to www.anz.com. Escape character is '^]'. ^] telnet> quit Connection closed. real 0m44.633s A DNS query, however, responds almost immediately: time dig www.anz.com.au [...] ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;www.anz.com.au. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: www.anz.com.au. 9798 IN CNAME www.anz.com. www.anz.com. 1 IN A 202.2.59.40 www.anz.com. 1 IN A 202.2.56.40 [...] real 0m0.288s And an HTTP connection by IP number instead of by name responds almost immediately, also. I see no packets coming from them (e.g. IDENT queries) that would account for the delay. One of their IP numbers (202.2.56.40) has no PTR record, but I don't think that has anything to do with it. > > Another thread on this list "[kde-freebsd] Konqueror very slow displaying > some sites" puts it down to DNS. Any ideas? > Could be an issue with the FreeBSD resolver. It's happened in the past, but I thought that was all cleared up now. I don't know if "dig" uses the native resolver or implements one of its own. I suspect the latter. - Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 15:00:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17FA116A422 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:00:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B9943D53 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:00:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6PF0f0d027979 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:00:42 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050725074818.1abf71b0@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:57:19 -0700 To: FreeBSD Questions , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <10549b08050725052035362ea8@mail.gmail.com> References: <10549b08050725052035362ea8@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: Dump/Tape block question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:00:44 -0000 At 05:20 AM 7/25/2005, FreeBSD Questions wrote: >Sorry if this is a repeat. I posted this on the 21st and never saw it show up >in the mailing list, so I'm assuming nobody ever received it. > >I have a question about dump and tape blocks. When I do backups, dump >tells me it uses a certain number of blocks for that particular >backup. I explicitly set my block size to 65K when I do a dump. When >I read the SCSI or hardware block location on the tape after the dump, >it's nowhere near the same number as what dump said it used. Assuming you're using the -b option, -b 64 will tell dump to write 64K at a time. When dump is done, and it tells you how many blocks it wrote, multiply that by 65536 and that will tell you how many bytes were written. -Glenn >How big is each block? I'd like to know about where on the tape I am >when I do an 'mt rdhpos' command (but I don't know how to determine >the reported block size), and I'd like to be able to calculate how >much data was written for each backup based on the number of blocks >dumped (I assume these blocks are the size I specify on the dump >command line). In fact, how can I calculate how many blocks my tape >can hold? (i.e. What is the biggest block number an 'mt rdhpos' or >'mt rdspos' will report for my tape?) > >Of course, an obvious solution to the last question is to write enough >data to fill the tape and then check the output of 'mt rdhpos'. I'd >rather not spend the hours needed and the unneeded wear on the tape to >figure that out. > >Kevin >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 15:03:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F184716A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:03:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@mediamill.co.za) Received: from ctb-mesg1.saix.net (ctb-mesg1.saix.net [196.25.240.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78CBA43D53 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:03:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@mediamill.co.za) Received: from [192.168.1.203] (rndf-146-53-244.telkomadsl.co.za [165.146.53.244]) by ctb-mesg1.saix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658F36625 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:03:46 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <42E5005D.1060805@mediamill.co.za> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:08:13 +0200 From: Gavin McDougall User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: change mediaopt of NIC to full-duplex X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:03:50 -0000 Hi there, I need to set my network cards (Intel Pro 1000) to full-duplex. I tried using ifconfig with the mediaopt option which worked, but only temporarily. I then downloaded mii-tool 'cos it wasn't in the ports collection but it just gives me critical errors when I try to compile it. Is there possibly another method that I can use on my FreeBSD server to permanently change my NIC settings to full-duplex? Thanks, Gavin -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 15:06:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2540916A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:06:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC2D43D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:06:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.247.55] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id AFB12A460102; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:05:21 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6PF6odo009575; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:06:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6PF6gvd009574; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:06:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: =?iso-8859-1?q?B=F6lcskei_Zolt=E1n?= References: <20050725082503.39F004C39C@web05.citromail.hu> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:06:42 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20050725082503.39F004C39C@web05.citromail.hu> =?iso-8859-1?q?=28B=F6lcskei_Zolt=E1n's?= message of "Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:25:02 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:06:11 -0000 "Bölcskei Zoltán" writes: > Hi!I don't have an internet connection at home so i wanna know if there are any places where i can download packages/distfiles with dependencies recursively/together [e.g.: a tarred file or s.g. like that which includes the package and all of it's dependencies](because downloading them one-by-one is quite annoying)??? (Please limit your lines to about 70 characters; many mail readers do not re-format your messages.) I haven't used it, but I suspect that "portinstall -PRf xxx" will fetch the dist files for xxx and dist files xxx needs. Check the manpage. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 15:07:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFBF16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:07:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leblanc@keyslapper.net) Received: from camomile.cloud9.net (camomile.cloud9.net [168.100.1.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6792743D73 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:07:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leblanc@keyslapper.net) Received: from camomile.cloud9.net (localhost.cloud9.net [127.0.0.1]) by camomile.cloud9.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BF795655; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:07:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from keyslapper.net (250-119.customer.cloud9.net [168.100.250.119]) by camomile.cloud9.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07A35642; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:07:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by keyslapper.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C34511599; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:07:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from keyslapper.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (keyslapper.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72281-08; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:07:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by keyslapper.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 64B3811573; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:07:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:07:20 -0400 From: Louis LeBlanc To: Aguiar Magalhaes Message-ID: <20050725150720.GC71939@keyslapper.net> Mail-Followup-To: Aguiar Magalhaes , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050725145356.57417.qmail@web31614.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050725145356.57417.qmail@web31614.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-PGP-Key: http://www.keyslapper.net/~leblanc/leblanc-at-keyslapper-net.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at keyslapper.net X-AntiVirus: Checked by Vexira Antivirus v1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Update 5.3 Release to 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:07:44 -0000 --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/25/05 11:53 AM, Aguiar Magalhaes sat at the `puter and typed: > Hi list, >=20 > I=B4m using FreeBSD 5.3 - Release in servers (Postfix, > Apache, pf, squid, etc) >=20 > I=B4d like to update for 5.4, but I don=B4t know how to > do. Is it safe ? Worked for me. It should be "safe". So long as you follow the directions here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html including the backup. Lou --=20 Louis LeBlanc FreeBSD-at-keyslapper-DOT-net Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) Please send off-list email to: leblanc at keyslapper d.t net Key fingerprint =3D C5E7 4762 F071 CE3B ED51 4FB8 AF85 A2FE 80C8 D9A2 knowledge, n.: Things you believe. --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC5QAor4Wi/oDI2aIRAgLnAJwPhi/uggbzTDkBUNIvNWzabHGwhgCgjjQv iRlL2tjdfK3OCl1MWCFLNPk= =U9q9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 15:16:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2081716A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:16:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@interpool.ca) Received: from simmts7-srv.bellnexxia.net (simmts7.bellnexxia.net [206.47.199.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8959443D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:16:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@interpool.ca) Received: from interpool.homeunix.com ([70.48.235.180]) by simmts7-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with SMTP id <20050725151651.XROU23474.simmts7-srv.bellnexxia.net@interpool.homeunix.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:16:51 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:16:52 -0400 From: Gerry Freymann To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050725111652.2aeb0f6d.lists@interpool.ca> In-Reply-To: <42E5005D.1060805@mediamill.co.za> References: <42E5005D.1060805@mediamill.co.za> Organization: Interpool Development www.interpool.ca X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.11) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lists@mediamill.co.za Subject: Re: change mediaopt of NIC to full-duplex X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:16:56 -0000 On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:08:13 +0200 Gavin McDougall wrote: >I need to set my network cards (Intel Pro 1000) to full-duplex. >I tried using ifconfig with the mediaopt option which worked, but only >temporarily. Temporarily? because you restarted your system? Add the mediaopt option to /etc/rc.conf on your ifconfig_XXX line. Regards, -gerry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 15:17:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1FA816A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:17:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tobias.fendin@telia.com) Received: from pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.159]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BF743D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:17:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tobias.fendin@telia.com) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (81.229.46.22) by pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.2.060.1) (authenticated as u18317830) id 42B937170053D838 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:17:37 +0200 Message-ID: <42E5028C.4080800@telia.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:17:32 +0200 From: Tobias Fendin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050403) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: FreeBSD Questions References: <42E5005D.1060805@mediamill.co.za> In-Reply-To: <42E5005D.1060805@mediamill.co.za> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: change mediaopt of NIC to full-duplex X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:17:39 -0000 Gavin McDougall wrote: > Hi there, > > I need to set my network cards (Intel Pro 1000) to full-duplex. > > I tried using ifconfig with the mediaopt option which worked, but only > temporarily. > > I then downloaded mii-tool 'cos it wasn't in the ports collection but it > just gives me critical errors when I try to compile it. > > Is there possibly another method that I can use on my FreeBSD server to > permanently change my NIC settings to full-duplex? > > Thanks, > Gavin > -- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > set the mediaopt in your rc.conf example: ifconfig_xl0="blah blah mediaopt full-duplex" -Tobias From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 15:37:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A5D16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:37:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ds@hacked.com.br) Received: from web05.poli.usp.br (web05.poli.usp.br [143.107.106.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B61E43D4C for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:37:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ds@hacked.com.br) Received: from [172.20.0.3] ([201.26.177.164]) by web05.poli.usp.br over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:37:34 -0300 Message-ID: <42E50736.7020603@hacked.com.br> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:37:26 -0300 From: Vinicius Pavanelli Vianna User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gavin McDougall References: <42E5005D.1060805@mediamill.co.za> In-Reply-To: <42E5005D.1060805@mediamill.co.za> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jul 2005 15:37:36.0951 (UTC) FILETIME=[C892BC70:01C5912E] Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: change mediaopt of NIC to full-duplex X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:37:53 -0000 The nic returns to half duplex with those bright kernel messages? i got this when there was some kind of arp conflict on the ip, and from cables, somehow my isp cisco switch defaults to half duplex all the time, so when disconnect and connect the cable it returns to half =/ Gavin McDougall wrote: > Hi there, > > I need to set my network cards (Intel Pro 1000) to full-duplex. > > I tried using ifconfig with the mediaopt option which worked, but only > temporarily. > > I then downloaded mii-tool 'cos it wasn't in the ports collection but > it just gives me critical errors when I try to compile it. > > Is there possibly another method that I can use on my FreeBSD server > to permanently change my NIC settings to full-duplex? > > Thanks, > Gavin > -- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 15:50:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D883216A428 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:50:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E77943D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:50:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD1F5E22; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:50:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39671-01; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:50:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-54-113.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.54.113]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D72F5C90; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:50:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42E50A3D.2000201@mac.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:50:21 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vinicius Pavanelli Vianna References: <42E5005D.1060805@mediamill.co.za> <42E50736.7020603@hacked.com.br> In-Reply-To: <42E50736.7020603@hacked.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: Gavin McDougall , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: change mediaopt of NIC to full-duplex X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:50:32 -0000 Vinicius Pavanelli Vianna wrote: > The nic returns to half duplex with those bright kernel messages? > i got this when there was some kind of arp conflict on the ip, and from > cables, somehow my isp cisco switch defaults to half duplex all the > time, so when disconnect and connect the cable it returns to half =/ Have your ISP update their Cisco switches' firmware, and recheck whether ethernet autonegotiate works then. If it doesn't, both sides will have to manually set full duplex... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 15:55:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B123E16A420 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:55:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marshall301@comcast.net) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4265D43D5C for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:55:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marshall301@comcast.net) Received: from ist-lawloj-f54-lt.vhamaster (pcp01097822pcs.tsclos01.al.comcast.net[68.62.131.211]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP id <2005072515554301300if2pee>; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:55:43 +0000 Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:59:01 -0500 From: Marshall To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050725105901.09992169.marshall301@comcast.net> Organization: Open Source Systems of Alabama X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.12 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Multipart=_Mon__25_Jul_2005_10_59_01_-0500_PDT8hyc+CoKMVAwj" Subject: Ripping cd's with mp3c X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:55:46 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Multipart=_Mon__25_Jul_2005_10_59_01_-0500_PDT8hyc+CoKMVAwj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit mp3c doesn't seem to rip or encode songs from the cd. It does see the cd, it lists the songs on it, but just creates an empty file of every song with a .mp3 extension that won't play. I've configured the .mp3crc config file, which must contain an error somewhere. Any ideas? Thanks. --Multipart=_Mon__25_Jul_2005_10_59_01_-0500_PDT8hyc+CoKMVAwj Content-Type: text/plain; name="my_.mp3crc.txt" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="my_.mp3crc.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit # WSPse's MP3-Creator (Configfile) # automaticly created, but you may edit this file manually. # [25.07.2005 09:58] - program version: 0.27 # {mp3c-0.27 (NLS) - ENGLISH (Jul 25 2005)} # version number (to detect updates and inform about news) mp3c_version = "0.27" # cdrom-device cd_dev = "/dev/acd0c" # CDDB-server [host:port] (more servers maybe seperated by commas) # use "0" to disable server-access # note: cddb.cddb.com:8880 is not longer usable cddb_serv = "freedb.freedb.org:8880" # local CDDB database cddb_loc = "~/cddb" # if remote CDDB access is allowed rem_cddb = 1 # mailadress to which CDDB should be sent (more addresses maybe seperated # by commas) cddb_email = "freedb-submit@freedb.org" # relaying smtp-server who handle my emails [host:port] smtp_serv = "localhost:smtp" # my email adress for authorizing [user@host] my_email = "marshall301@comcast.net" # directory for mp3-files mp3_dir = "/usr/home/vhaistlawloj/mus" # program for ripping cd-tracks (to file) # %1 = cdrom device # %2 = track (numeric) # %3 = outputfile rip_nf_prg = "dagrab -o 6 -n 32 -d %1 -f %3 %2" # program for ripping cd-tracks (to stdout) # %1 = cdrom device # %2 = track (numeric) rip_of_prg = "cdrip.sh %1 %2" # program for encoding wav->mp3 (from file to file) # %1 = inputfile # %2 = outputfile # %3 = albumname # %4 = MP3 genre by number # %5 = year # %6 = comment # %7 = filename # %8 = MP3 genre by name # %a = tracknumber # %b = tracknumber (with leading zeros) # %c = artistname # %d = title enc_nf_prg = "gogo %1 %2" # program for encoding wav->mp3 (from stdin to file) # %1 = outputfile # %3 = albumname # %4 = MP3 genre by number # %5 = year # %6 = comment # %7 = filename # %8 = MP3 genre by name # %a = tracknumber # %b = tracknumber (with leading zeros) # %c = artistname # %d = title enc_of_prg = "gogo /tmp/mp3 "%1" -b 160" # program for creating mp3 info # use mp3_info_prg = "0" to disable usage of tagprogram # %1 = artistname # %2 = title # %3 = albumname # %4 = genre (by number) # %5 = year # %6 = comment # %7 = filename # %8 = genre (by name) # %a = tracknumber # %b = tracknumber (with leading zeros) mp3_info_prg = "id3tool -r "%1" -t "%2" -a "%3" -y "%5" -g %4 -n "%6" "%7"" # string which replaced %8 in mp3_info_prg, if genre is unknown unknown_genre = "Unknown" # size of fifo-buffer for on the fly encoding (KB) of_fifo = 512 # pattern for mp3-filename-creation # %1 = artistname # %2 = title # %3 = albumname # %4 = genrestring # %5 = year # %6 = tracknumber # %7 = tracknumber (with leading zeros) # %8 = cddb-id mp3_pattern = "%7-%2.mp3" # pattern fro mp3-filename-creation for sampler cds # same pattern like in mp3_pattern mp3_pattern_mix = "%7-%2.mp3" # mode for handling spaces in filenames # 0: spaces allowed, 1: spaces will be converted to underscores # 2: spaces will be killed pat_mode = 1 # appereance of filename case # 0: as it is in CDDB entry # 1: convert to lowercase (first letter will be uppercase if pat_upc = 1 # 2: convert to uppercase case_chg = 0 # convert first letter of filename to uppercase # 0: no, 1: yes pat_upc = 1 # illegal characters which aren't allowed in filenames # (converted to '_' if mode != 2, else killed ill_chars = "~[]()!*?"" # what to do with illegal characters, should they be removed? # (otherwise convert to '_' or space, depending on pat_mode) # 0: no, use pat_mode, 1: yes, remove rem_ill_char = 1 # protect pattern from substitution operations? # 0: no, 1: yes pattern_protect = 1 # character which should replace slashes in album, artist, title # (only one character allowed, use "0" to accept slashes in these fields, which causes strange directory creation) slash_rep_char = "-" # non-strict character handling # 0: only printable chars allowed, 1: eased allowed chars eased_char_hand = 0 # default comment for mp3-files # %1 = artistname # %2 = title # %3 = albumname # %4 = genrestring # %5 = year # %6 = tracknumber # %7 = tracknumber (with leading zeros) # %8 = version-string of MP3c # %9 = cddb-id # %a = actual day (is set when encoding starts, or batchfile created) # %b = actual month # %c = actual year (2 digits) # %d = actual year (4 digits) # %e = weekday (3 letters) # %f = month (3 letters) # %g = actual hour # %h = actual minute # %i = minute-part of track-length # %j = second-part of track-length mp3_comment = "gen by WSPse-MP3c %8 [%b/%c]" # fancy color for windows (0: never, 1: sometimes, 2: ever) fancy_color = 1 # autosave configuration on exit (0: no, 1: yes) auto_save = 1 # default flag (0: default non-fly, 1: default on-fly) def_on_fly = 1 # rip-encode order (0: rip one track, then encode; 1: rip all tracks, # then encode) rip_enc_ord = 1 # open tray after encoding (0: no, 1:yes) open_tray = 1 # tmpfile (for non-on-the-fly convert) tmp_file = "/tmp/WSPse-MP3Creat.wav" # what to do with tempfiles on exits # 0: nothing, 1: delete marked, 2: delete all del_tmp_on_exit = 1 # default exportfile for ripped tracks def_exp_file = "./.mp3c-exported" # if deleteflag should cleared on export (0: no, 1: yes) clear_del_on_exp = 1 # framemultiplikator (to calculate size) frame_mult = 214 # pattern for m3u-playlist, use "0" to disable # %1 = artistname # %2 = title # %3 = albumname # %4 = genrestring # %5 = year # %6 = tracknumber # %7 = tracknumber (with leading zeros) # %8 = cddb-id m3u_pattern = "%1-%3.m3u" # pattern for m3u-playlist for sampler cds, use "0" to disable # same pattern like in m3u_pattern m3u_patmix = "%3.m3u" # directory for m3u-playlist, or "0" to use mp3-dir m3u_dir = "0" # how to build the filename for m3u-list # 0 = full path # 1 = relative to m3u-maindir # 2 = relative to m3u-file m3u_rel_name_type = 2 # existing CDDB genres, do not change manually cddb_genre_list = "blues,classical,country,data,folk,jazz,misc,newage,reggae,rock,soundtrack" # allow parallel running sessions of MP3c para_sessions_allowed = 1 # use internal directory requester use_dir_request = 1 --Multipart=_Mon__25_Jul_2005_10_59_01_-0500_PDT8hyc+CoKMVAwj-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 15:57:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B4216A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:57:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777FD43D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:57:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C085E46; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:57:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39671-04; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:57:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-54-113.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.54.113]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AD35D9C; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:57:08 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42E50BD9.9050207@mac.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:57:13 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Galdes, Andrew (ERHS)" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD is Very slow to load some sites X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:57:22 -0000 Galdes, Andrew (ERHS) wrote: > The website is www.anz.com.au. I suspect the security of the site is the > problem but cannot be sure. > > Another thread on this list "[kde-freebsd] Konqueror very slow displaying > some sites" puts it down to DNS. Any ideas? DNS response time is fine. However, it takes over 60 seconds for the site to answer a remote query via telnet, so I assume that the server is either overloaded or has been hacked. Apparently it's running IIS-4.0 on WinNT, so the safe money is on the latter... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 16:27:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A6016A420 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:27:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jstarng@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9483E43D4C for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:27:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jstarng@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 37so994820wra for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:27:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=YovzbcUWbVpZyhtQZelI6VnG/lPKrjGzynGmTjsTHNvKOVNDlAvj+DeVyuSDKFyo6j4TBOnoS3pwr6dUq8zJqgBmjtpwBO5PhcBnjfsrKRjokmKySfM7P6UNb7/Mqy0pC6upDCfsHmzbhB0HlTVvW5BllzkIhKOqUJjCVSnfP9U= Received: by 10.54.129.19 with SMTP id b19mr1771890wrd; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:27:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.147.8 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:27:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2d3ab026050725092742e3d4b3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:27:27 -0400 From: jstarng To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: question nmbd query_name_response X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jstarng List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:27:29 -0000 After installing samba from port i've been getting these messages on my terminal. How do i resolve this conflict? I'm using two NIC's and both work properly as far as folder sharing Jul 25 09:56:26 FreeBSD5-4 nmbd[496]: query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet 192.0.0.111 for name INTERNET<1d>. Jul 25 09:56:26 FreeBSD5-4 nmbd[496]: This response was from IP 192.168.1.37, reporting an IP address of 192.168.1.37. Jul 25 10:31:55 FreeBSD5-4 nmbd[496]: [2005/07/25 10:31:55, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:query_name_response(112) Jul 25 10:31:55 FreeBSD5-4 nmbd[496]: query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet 192.0.0.111 for name INTERNET<1d>. Jul 25 10:31:55 FreeBSD5-4 nmbd[496]: This response was from IP 192.168.1.37, reporting an IP address of 192.168.1.37. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 16:34:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6587816A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:34:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29D243D53 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:34:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fields.fields.utoronto.ca (fields.localdomain [192.168.216.11]) by fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields 6.0) with ESMTP id j6PGYXNV029051 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:34:33 -0400 Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (fields.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.11]) by fields.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields WS 6.0) with ESMTP id j6PGYU6P014995; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:34:30 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0D08D514C4; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:34:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:34:26 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Darryl Hoar Message-ID: <20050725163426.GA61019@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <005601c59126$53c98e30$0701a8c0@darryl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <005601c59126$53c98e30$0701a8c0@darryl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc34 build error on Freebsd 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:34:35 -0000 --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 09:37:02AM -0500, Darryl Hoar wrote: > Greetings, > I have 5.1 running on my machine. I installed cvsup > and upgraded my ports with it. I then went into > /usr/ports/databases/firebird-client and did a make install. >=20 > Of course it installed several other dependencies when > I did that. One thing is was trying to build/install was > gcc34. The following error was generated and the > entire process came to a halt. >=20 > ../.././..//gcc-3.4-20050719/libiberty/fibheap.c:395: warning: implicit > declaration of function `memset' > gmake[2]: *** [fibheap.o] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/lang/gcc34/work/build/i386-portbld-freebsd5.1/libiberty' > gmake[1]: *** [all-target-libiberty] Error 2 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc34/work/build' > gmake: *** [bootstrap-lean] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/gcc34. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > I google'd and searched the freebsd website/mailing list, > FAQ, but didn't find an answer to this problem. >=20 > Anybody have an pointers/help so I can get on with the install ? FYI, 5.1 is very old and long out of support. You should update to a modern release of FreeBSD if you want your port builds (and FreeBSD itself) to work smoothly. Kris --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC5RSSWry0BWjoQKURAsN5AJ4m6DR4Wowpvuo8/xWqYqy3pVvMhACeN12p j3tpPinUZBCuCmCwMZQLuFk= =Duls -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 16:45:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B63416A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:45:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from r.lupton@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BFF943D5E for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:45:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from r.lupton@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so512349nzo for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:45:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=IK5yvFVY9mEsdbX0T63XuF1PBmI+v8IddzB7133OJO1gqm0akcHRQVuMB1z8Eop5WMQMzgvLrQQ3LjdDf+JNoXv6Vv+u8lj9rr064VhI3r+oPGFQbvjeDCFmqNMcFI1yFxvEE5/AUCGniF7Cf4uoMFo+NFL3LzomQjMhbh9oXdc= Received: by 10.36.25.20 with SMTP id 20mr2248819nzy; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:45:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.146.6 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:44:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <303718d9050725094456d67baf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:44:59 +0100 From: Richard Lupton To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Laptop mode for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Richard Lupton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:45:29 -0000 Hello, I have an old NEC Versa LX laptop with a very noisy disk. Mostly from the point of view of making it quieter, rather than saving power, I would like to let the disk spin down in the same way as laptop_mode does for linux. I can set the standby time and power saving options for the disk using ataidle, but the disk doesn't stay spun down for any length of time. Does anyone know of an equivalent to laptop_mode, or alternatively the appropriate sysctls to postpone disk access? Thanks, Richard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 16:53:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62DF16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:53:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jackqqpro@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99DE43D48 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:53:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jackqqpro@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so454363rne for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:53:14 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=hGc7E8KcJGnkZ+Yp472sU99Vj/RzDXkEkIWmB1ML5g/3zffbsmoHbL246LeLXqVMEZym35rwS1hAODqKtg48sFT9sk4BltokbDrt/hqtr6IxZ/Tu9MIrmk5KMjJg/gQ+qgfIzKpQlvA8zvUgJTWF7RuvWFpxhProuhLCX0/2YT4= Received: by 10.39.2.68 with SMTP id e68mr1394606rni; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:52:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.104.31 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:52:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <890a507f05072509526407a4df@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:52:19 +0800 From: jackqq To: freebsd-questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Problem report rejected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jackqq List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:53:18 -0000 I sent a problem report using send-pr this evening. Later tonight I was notified by my local MAILER-DAEMON, telling me the message I sent (actually, my host) was rejected, excerpted as follows: ********************************************** ** THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY ** ** YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE ** ********************************************** The original message was received at Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:54:57 +0800 (CST) from localhost [127.0.0.1] ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to mx1.freebsd.org.: >>> DATA <<< 450 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [60.26.7.157] ... Deferred: 450 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [60.26.7.157] <<< 554 Error: no valid recipients Warning: message still undelivered after 4 hours Will keep trying until message is 5 days old I realized it was an anti-spam measure. Although the notification said I should wait for another 5 days, I don't see much hope that the message will be accepted this way. I googled for "freebsd 450 client host rejected" and found a topic "Freebsd list rejects mail", which was posted in this mailing list later 2003. But the solution didn't seem to be quite suitable for me. I'm an ADSL subscriber, and I have dynamic IP addresses, and my ISP won't serve me a DNS entry. Frankly speaking, I do not intend to serve SMTP on my machine currently, and I enable sendmail only for convenience for applications like send-pr. I had a carbon copy of the PR message sent to, and received by, my mailbox at GMail. May I, if fortunately enough, forward my copy at GMail to freebsd.org to submit the problem report? Thanks in advance! --=20 jackqq :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 16:59:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E89D16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:59:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F87B43D49 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:59:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fields.fields.utoronto.ca (fields.localdomain [192.168.216.11]) by fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields 6.0) with ESMTP id j6PGxiNV031928 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:59:44 -0400 Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (fields.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.11]) by fields.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields WS 6.0) with ESMTP id j6PGxh6P017877; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:59:44 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 10CC5514C4; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:59:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:59:39 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: jackqq Message-ID: <20050725165939.GA61471@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <890a507f05072509526407a4df@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <890a507f05072509526407a4df@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Problem report rejected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:59:46 -0000 --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 12:52:19AM +0800, jackqq wrote: > I sent a problem report using send-pr this evening. Later tonight I > was notified by my local MAILER-DAEMON, telling me the message I sent > (actually, my host) was rejected, excerpted as follows: >=20 > ********************************************** > ** THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY ** > ** YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE ** > ********************************************** >=20 > The original message was received at Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:54:57 +0800 (CST) > from localhost [127.0.0.1] >=20 > ----- Transcript of session follows ----- > ... while talking to mx1.freebsd.org.: > >>> DATA > <<< 450 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [60.26.7.157] > ... Deferred: 450 Client host > rejected: cannot find your hostname, [60.26.7.157] > <<< 554 Error: no valid recipients > Warning: message still undelivered after 4 hours > Will keep trying until message is 5 days old >=20 >=20 > I realized it was an anti-spam measure. Although the notification said > I should wait for another 5 days, I don't see much hope that the > message will be accepted this way. >=20 > I googled for "freebsd 450 client host rejected" and found a topic > "Freebsd list rejects mail", which was posted in this mailing list > later 2003. But the solution didn't seem to be quite suitable for me. > I'm an ADSL subscriber, and I have dynamic IP addresses, and my ISP > won't serve me a DNS entry. Frankly speaking, I do not intend to serve > SMTP on my machine currently, and I enable sendmail only for > convenience for applications like send-pr. >=20 > I had a carbon copy of the PR message sent to, and received by, my > mailbox at GMail. May I, if fortunately enough, forward my copy at > GMail to freebsd.org to submit the problem report? You can use the web-based PR submission form. Kris --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC5Rp7Wry0BWjoQKURAtKAAJ9UgHRQ6ukzU1jkdehAF5UkGKhWDACdGcFQ /WWRsSLsgKV1su0p6BWV5Bg= =1ENX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 17:10:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1062E16A431; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:10:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tmas@dei.uc.pt) Received: from smtp2.dei.uc.pt (smtp2.dei.uc.pt [193.137.203.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57C443D4C; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:10:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tmas@dei.uc.pt) Received: from laptop (gtDEI-Vlans2.dei.uc.pt [193.137.203.230]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp2.dei.uc.pt (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6PHA5QL007771 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:10:07 +0100 Message-Id: <200507251710.j6PHA5QL007771@smtp2.dei.uc.pt> From: "Tiago Sousa" To: , Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:10:04 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Thread-Index: AcWRO7HvFn9DUHgKQjqfCy5WUcn1nA== X-UC-FCT-DEI-SIC-MailScanner-Information: Please contact helpdesk@dei.uc.pt for more information X-UC-FCT-DEI-SIC-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UC-FCT-DEI-SIC-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-5.752, required 3, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -3.30, BAYES_00 -2.60, HTML_80_90 0.15, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00) X-UC-FCT-DEI-SIC-MailScanner-From: tmas@dei.uc.pt Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: PF with Freebsd5.4 and Altq with freebsd4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:10:28 -0000 Hello to all I am trying to install the diffserv model in my testbed. I have computers with freebsd4.11 and kame + altq kernel options and computers with freebsd 5.4 + kame + altq and pf kernel options. The first doubt that I have is: My border routers are those with the freebsd5.4 + pf. Can I mark the packets with pf? Someone had told me that with pf I can not use the traffic conditioners of the diffserv model (i guess I can shape but not marking). Is that true? If so, how can I mark the packets? Which restrictions have pf in comparison with altq, i.e., what are the things that altq can do but pf don't. There is any? Thanks. Tiago From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 17:11:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88AAA16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:11:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brian.henning@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F86A43D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:11:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brian.henning@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id r35so412581rna for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:11:35 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=shmoSOvpdh2+61HqhCndYuLLjLdG82dk+PT9H9ZZ5KbrwsPKQ2hZ/jPnhI8bBbOvteIcI7R53p5mmJ0ubpmIA+LHRRkaSm0zP4zvG7cxp/zjFa+sESH1yeq8GsUsI3iafnAcBN07PhPzND5uxW3g+UaEOgRQJfMCRLoc6vfW0Tg= Received: by 10.38.59.57 with SMTP id h57mr1652236rna; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:11:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.86.49 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:11:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1f75ab0e05072510117c119a1d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:11:35 -0500 From: Brian Henning To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: burncd - verify burn X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Brian Henning List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:11:36 -0000 Greetings: I would like to know a process to verify that I my cd burner has burned an ISO file correctly with burncd. I know I can take some precautions like checking the md5sum of the iso during a transfer from the Internet. I also read on the Internet that burncd does puts some extra padding at the end of the cd. I am not sure if that is true or not. Could someone tell me how to verify a cd burn? Thanks, Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 17:13:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3DB16A420 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:13:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC9943D48 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:13:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 22240 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2005 17:13:55 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 25 Jul 2005 17:13:55 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 761B52E; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:13:54 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: zick-1 References: <1938435099.20050723230354@gmail.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 25 Jul 2005 13:13:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1938435099.20050723230354@gmail.com> Message-ID: <44k6jen6zx.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: X system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:13:56 -0000 zick-1 writes: > Hello. > > Help to adjust the monitor and videocard in graphic interface X. At me > FreeBSD 5.4.I used xorgcfg -textmode but thus made changes it is impossible to start X. > > It writes: > Withing for X server to shut down > xauth: creating new autority file /root/.Xauthority > xauth: (argv) :1 bad display name ":0" in remove command > xauth: (argv) :1 bad display name ":0" in remove command > > Changes correspond to my equipment. > What to do? Look for another X display, and kill it first. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 17:21:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EBFD16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:21:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F9043D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:21:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.247.55] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id AFB117CC0148; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:21:53 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6PHMTRn001498; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:22:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6PHMO5Y001497; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:22:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: jackqq References: <890a507f05072509526407a4df@mail.gmail.com> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:22:24 -0700 In-Reply-To: <890a507f05072509526407a4df@mail.gmail.com> (jackqq's message of "Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:52:19 +0800") Message-ID: <8qoe8q2433.e8q@mail.opusnet.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Problem report rejected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:21:55 -0000 jackqq writes: > <<< 450 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [60.26.7.157] > ... Deferred: 450 Client host > rejected: cannot find your hostname, [60.26.7.157] ... > I'm an ADSL subscriber, and I have dynamic IP addresses, and my ISP I am too, and saw as similar msg when first got going after installing a new OS version. A change in the sendmail config was needed. IIRC, all you need to do is do the "make" stuff in /etc/mail after removing "dnl " and fixing 2nd arg in this line of the appropriate ".mc" file: dnl define(`SMART_HOST', `your.isp.mail.server') > SMTP on my machine currently, and I enable sendmail only for > convenience for applications like send-pr. Last time I tried send-pr (years ago) it wouldn't work with my sendmail config and I've been using regular mail (from a PR template based on output of "send-pr -P") ever since. > I had a carbon copy of the PR message sent to, and received by, my > mailbox at GMail. May I, if fortunately enough, forward my copy at > GMail to freebsd.org to submit the problem report? Don't know; shouldn't hurt to try. Or use the web form at "www.freebsd.org". From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 17:22:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A6516A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:22:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from djh@nebcorp.com) Received: from ratchet.nebcorp.com (ratchet.nebcorp.com [205.217.153.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF99E43D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:22:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from djh@nebcorp.com) Received: by ratchet.nebcorp.com (Postfix, from userid 1014) id 86722D9823; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:22:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:22:58 -0700 From: Danny Howard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050725172258.GZ24353@ratchet.nebcorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Loop: djhoward@uiuc.edu Subject: Crypto Accelerators? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:22:59 -0000 Hello, Does anyone have suggestions as to preferred hardware crypto accelerators? I want to improve performance of our SSL-based web application, and making it easier for the web server to spew encrypted ought to help. :) Based on http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/hardware-i386.html#CRYPTO-ACCEL and the notes at http://www.openbsd.org/crypto.html#hardware I get the impression that the Broadcom stuff is probably best, as they have had the friendliest history of driver support, and there are a bunch of different cards listed under the FreeBSD page. Anyone like to confirm or amend this impression? Vouch for a particular card? Thanks, -danny From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 17:26:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29BB16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:26:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE9443D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:26:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 24588 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2005 17:26:11 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 25 Jul 2005 17:26:11 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id EC1D955; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:26:10 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: freebsd-questions@auscert.org.au References: <200507250206.j6P26QsZ094083@app.auscert.org.au> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 25 Jul 2005 13:26:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200507250206.j6P26QsZ094083@app.auscert.org.au> Message-ID: <44fyu2n6fh.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to create mtree files? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:26:12 -0000 freebsd-questions@auscert.org.au writes: > I would like to use the mtree utility to confirm no changes have > occurred to system files since 'make installworld', similar to that > possible with 'mtree -f /cdrom/5.4-RELEASE/base/base.mtree' on a > release installation. This would also give the added advantage of > being able to determine the current buildlevel of an installed > system, I believe. Is it possible/easy to create new mtree files > after the buildworld or installworld process? I've looked at the > Release Engineering docs but it seems more than what I'd like to > do. I should add that I am running tripwire, but I really want to > have a quick way to verify which files were part of which installworld. "man 8 mtree" has full details. "mtree -c -p /" is the start of what you're looking for. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 17:36:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D8816A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:36:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean.hafeez@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DAD643D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:36:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean.hafeez@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so518474nzo for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:36:40 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:content-type:to:subject:date:x-mailer:from; b=RUZDiMMtZYbK5+EYM45ZFCfGG/KtGsiChIWBZiPs7U8a+mhzimYU9QHsdrUAo9wytedhOzwn3HMQWX1eo4QifOn6hr0inUA2GKb2g1qu8/nOnIkQ92Ov2X99jPFr+6ptVloF+qcyQEPwbuC1U/5fiNQSFNzfAd7Jb3Jngy30rDQ= Received: by 10.36.251.61 with SMTP id y61mr138228nzh; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:29:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.105? ([67.109.14.227]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 8sm4181547nzn.2005.07.25.10.29.49; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:29:50 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <5124A2BF-BD43-434F-9B3A-176CF94DDDD1@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:29:46 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) From: Sean Hafeez Subject: 5.x, 3ware 7506-8, twe4, raid5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:36:41 -0000 I am looking at getting a 3ware 7506-8 for a FreeBSD 5.4 box. I have looked at the hardware support, finding the twe4 driver. How would people rate this card under FreeBSD? I am currently using an Adaptec ATA-100 RAID 2400A which only support 4 drives. I would like to run an 8 drive RAID5 with the 7506-8. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 17:37:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5CC16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:37:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79CF143D49 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:37:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.247.55] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A35A673300B6; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:37:30 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6PHc6W5001732; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:38:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6PHc19g001731; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:38:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: Brian Henning References: <1f75ab0e05072510117c119a1d@mail.gmail.com> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:38:01 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1f75ab0e05072510117c119a1d@mail.gmail.com> (Brian Henning's message of "Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:11:35 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: burncd - verify burn X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:37:30 -0000 Brian Henning writes: > I would like to know a process to verify that I my cd burner has > burned an ISO file correctly with burncd. I know I can take some > precautions like checking the md5sum of the iso during a transfer from > the Internet. I also read on the Internet that burncd does puts some > extra padding at the end of the cd. I am not sure if that is true or > not. Could someone tell me how to verify a cd burn? Here's a crummy script I just used to burn and verify a CD, but I've only tested it with the "cdrecord" setup. Older versions of it worked with "burncd" on older OS versions, but I can tell you that the reason I'm using "cdrecord" is that my manual efforts to do this with "burncd" on 5.4-RELEASE (and maybe 5.4-STABLE a couple weeks ago) failed, because I couldn't "dd" a CD burned with "burncd". (IE, I couldn't sucessfully "dd" /dev/acd0, while I could "dd" /dev/cd0). (Search this for "diff" to find the "verify". ISO images generally get an extra two blocks of something on the CD "for run-out". See "-isosize" description of "cdrecord" manpage.) #!/bin/ksh -o posix ## mkisocd [-blank] - file_name # ## This burns and compares a file to the beginning of the write-only CD (CD-R). ## This must be run by superuser. # # Note that the CD burning software (burncd) often writes an ISO CD at least a block bigger than the file. # I'm not sure why. (It's not a hard disk file system block size thing.) #BURNER=/usr/local/bin/readcd BURNCD=/usr/sbin/burncd CDRECORD=/usr/local/bin/cdrecord BURNER=$BURNCD BURNER=$CDRECORD if [ "${1}" == -blank ]; then if [ ${BURNER} == ${BURNCD} ]; then BLANK="blank" else BLANK="blank=fast" fi shift else BLANK= fi TEMP="${1#-}" if [ "${TEMP}" != "$1" ]; then SPEED="${TEMP}" shift else echo 'WARNING: nothing done; speed must be given as "-factor" (eg -16)' exit 1 fi FILENAME="$1" #DEBUG; echo "SPEED = '$SPEED', FILENAME = '$FILENAME'" #exit if [ ! -r "${FILENAME}" -o ! -f "${FILENAME}" ]; then echo "ERROR: The argument, \"${FILENAME}\", is not a readable regular file. Nothing done." exit 2 fi ## TBD REMOVE ##blocks=$(( $(ls -l "${FILENAME}" | awk '{print $5;}') / ${blockbytes} )) blockbytes=2048 ## Block size of ISO CDs. Nothing else will work (esp, in dd command). filebytes=$(stat -f "%z" "${FILENAME}") fileblocks=$(( ${filebytes} / ${blockbytes} )) if [ $(( ${fileblocks} * ${blockbytes} )) != ${filebytes} ]; then echo "ERROR: '${FILENAME}' is not a multiple of the CD blocksize, ${blockbytes}. Nothing done." exit 3 fi echo "WARNING: About to burn this file (${filebytes} bytes, ${fileblocks} blocks) to CD." ls -l "${FILENAME}" echo -n "Ensure CD in burner and enter \"y\" to continue, else to abort: " read if [ "$REPLY" != "y" ]; then echo "You entered \"$REPLY\", so the command is aborting with nothing done." exit 4 fi if [ ${BURNER} == ${BURNCD} ]; then DEV=/dev/acd0 time burncd -f ${DEV} -s ${SPEED} ${BLANK} data "${FILENAME}" fixate else DEV=/dev/cd0 ## cdrecord's default SCSI "dev" is in /usr/local/etc/ time cdrecord -v speed=${SPEED} ${BLANK} "${FILENAME}" fi if [ $? != 0 ]; then echo "ERROR: $BURNER failed. See above error message." exit 5 fi beep 2& sleep 2 ## ?? echo "NOTICE: Comparing \"${FILENAME}\" to the just-written CD. Please wait..." if dd if=${DEV} count=${fileblocks} bs=${blockbytes} | diff - "${FILENAME}"; then echo "NOTICE: Comparison OK. The CD seems OK." else echo "ERROR: The CD and file differred." fi echo done beep 3& exit 0 # The End. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 17:41:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A5B16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:41:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436CA43D49 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:41:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6PHfumA032526 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:41:57 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050725103726.10b56b50@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:38:31 -0700 To: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen), Brian Henning From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: References: <1f75ab0e05072510117c119a1d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: burncd - verify burn X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:41:58 -0000 At 10:38 AM 7/25/2005, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: >Brian Henning writes: > > > I would like to know a process to verify that I my cd burner has > > burned an ISO file correctly with burncd. I know I can take some > > precautions like checking the md5sum of the iso during a transfer from > > the Internet. I also read on the Internet that burncd does puts some > > extra padding at the end of the cd. I am not sure if that is true or > > not. Could someone tell me how to verify a cd burn? > >Here's a crummy script I just used to burn and verify a CD, but I've >only tested it with the "cdrecord" setup. Older versions of it worked >with "burncd" on older OS versions, but I can tell you that the reason >I'm using "cdrecord" is that my manual efforts to do this with >"burncd" on 5.4-RELEASE (and maybe 5.4-STABLE a couple weeks ago) >failed, because I couldn't "dd" a CD burned with "burncd". (IE, I >couldn't sucessfully "dd" /dev/acd0, while I could "dd" /dev/cd0). did you use bs=2048 when dd'ing from /dev/acd0? -Glenn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 17:53:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2BCD16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:53:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3363043D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:53:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from bsdbox.farid-hajji.net (bsdbox [192.168.254.3]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E49B4B4D4; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:51:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:58:21 +0200 From: cpghost To: "Galdes, Andrew (ERHS)" Message-ID: <20050725175821.GA73763@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD is Very slow to load some sites X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:53:16 -0000 On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 08:27:37AM +0930, Galdes, Andrew (ERHS) wrote: > Freebsd seems to take a long time (up to ten minutes) to load some web > sites. When i use Linux or Windows it seems to load at normal speed. I have > installed Freebsd (same version) on another computer and it has the same > trouble. I have tried both firefox and konqueror. > > The website is www.anz.com.au. I suspect the security of the site is the > problem but cannot be sure. A bit sluggish here with Firefox 1.0.5 (from ports). Page loads in approx 30 seconds. Once the page is loaded, other pages are served almost instantly. Stopping firefox and restarting it, results in the same initial delay. With w3m, every page access results in that approx 30 secs delay; perhaps because w3m doesn't keep the connection open? > Another thread on this list "[kde-freebsd] Konqueror very slow displaying > some sites" puts it down to DNS. Any ideas? It could be DNS related. I've run $ truss w3m http://www.anz.com.au/ after mounting /proc, and most of the waiting time is spent querying the local DNS server. After getting a reply from the DNS server, everything starts running smoothing and fast again: [... here, things start slowing down considerably ...] socket(0x2,0x2,0x0) = 5 (0x5) connect(0x5,{ AF_INET 192.168.254.1:53 },16) = 0 (0x0) sendto(0x5,0x8148000,0,0x0,NULL,0x0) = 32 (0x20) gettimeofday({1122313919 295525},0x0) = 0 (0x0) kevent(0x4,0xbfbfd4b0,0x1,0xbfbfd4b0,0x1,0xbfbfd490) = 0 (0x0) close(5) = 0 (0x0) socket(0x2,0x2,0x0) = 5 (0x5) connect(0x5,{ AF_INET 192.168.254.1:53 },16) = 0 (0x0) sendto(0x5,0x8148000,0,0x0,NULL,0x0) = 32 (0x20) gettimeofday({1122313924 303323},0x0) = 0 (0x0) kevent(0x4,0xbfbfd4b0,0x1,0xbfbfd4b0,0x1,0xbfbfd490) = 0 (0x0) close(5) = 0 (0x0) socket(0x2,0x2,0x0) = 5 (0x5) connect(0x5,{ AF_INET 192.168.254.1:53 },16) = 0 (0x0) sendto(0x5,0x8148000,0,0x0,NULL,0x0) = 32 (0x20) gettimeofday({1122313934 313571},0x0) = 0 (0x0) kevent(0x4,0xbfbfd4b0,0x1,0xbfbfd4b0,0x1,0xbfbfd490) = 1 (0x1) recvfrom(0x5,0x8138000,0,0x0,{ AF_INET 192.168.254.1:53 },0xbfbfd484) = 32 (0x20 ) close(5) = 0 (0x0) close(4) = 0 (0x0) [... from here, everything runs very fast again ...] > -Andrew Regards, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 18:02:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4699116A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:02:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3AEA43D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:02:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from bsdbox.farid-hajji.net (bsdbox [192.168.254.3]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9674BB9E; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:01:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:07:57 +0200 From: cpghost To: zick-1 Message-ID: <20050725180757.GB73763@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> References: <1414695455.20050725101750@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1414695455.20050725101750@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: question FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:02:52 -0000 On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 10:17:50AM +0600, zick-1 wrote: > Hello. > > I cannot install the application from a collection of ports. > The mistake is given out ----Error code 1 1. Which application did you try to install? 2. Please give more lines (say, 20 to 30 or so) before the Error code 1 line, because that's the place where the real error is normally listed. It may be possible that the port you're trying to install is broken (doesn't compile cleanly) in your collection. If that's the case, you may wish to update your ports collection and try again. Perhaps the problem has been already fixed? > Best regards, > zick-1 mailto:zickxell@gmail.com Cheers, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 18:19:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3724116A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:19:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerori@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21A543D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:19:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerori@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i13so1022226wra for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:19:39 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=cLmYKOP70ikkKbopDBJqb4plKFymO7dPE+kerULGiK1V6eXsDe8BVuOKNcVy1i3szb6upiI2CgFKAhUSLpICKLU7R5QWNv6YriIallXVEmbMU7wspAirtMn0NpjCj3xGN6cvYD6cbWcc+Bq9tiT2YoawxGZdOKVpPbfeCL0aTi8= Received: by 10.54.129.19 with SMTP id b19mr1806317wrd; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:19:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.81.9 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:19:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <11aa082005072511195ad1e22f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:19:39 -0500 From: Jesus Romero To: questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: filesystem creation problem during the installation process. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jesus Romero List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:19:41 -0000 Hi, I have the following issue: Once I've chosen in the sysinstall main menu: 1- Standart Installation 2- ad0 as selected drive. 3- I've deleted the current partitions there and created a new one for Freebsd using "Use Entire Disk". But I have to click S to define this slice as ACTIVE partition and that's it. Click Q. 4- I use "Fdisk Partition Using Entire Disk" I click "A" as default partition. Click Q. 5- I select Standar like Boot Manager for drive ad0. 6- For Choose Distribution, I choose ALL. 7- For Choose Media, I choose CD/DVD. 8- And after I got the following warning: User Confirmation Requested Last Chance! Are you SURE you want to continue the installation?=20 If you're running this on a disk with data you wish to save then WE STRONGLY ENCOURAGE YOU TO MAKE PROPER BACKUPS before proceeding!=20 We can take no responsibility for lost disk contents! =20 [ Yes ] No 9- I chose, YES, and I've always gotten the following message. [ Unable to find device node for /dev/ad0s1b in /dev Creation of filesystem will be aborted ] 10- I've tried a lot alternatives, but without luck!! Please HELP!!! Thanks Advanced! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 18:36:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2403516A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:36:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643B043D49 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:36:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1Dx7Jk-0005Jj-1a for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:04:44 -0400 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6PIBFlo081635 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:11:16 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j6PIBFtS081634 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:11:15 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:11:14 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507251311.15216.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec7935c19de1365d8ffe23a94ad016dcb71f350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: pppOe 1000baseTX config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:36:02 -0000 Hi, I've recently switched from a Netgear router to use pppOe for my public internet ip on FreeBSD 5.4. My machine has two nics: bge0 and re0, both of which support 1000baseTX configurations, however neither of the two seem to be able to connect when I configure them in /etc/rc.conf. Here's what works: # Internal network ifconfig_re0="inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" # No ifconfig_bge0 entry in /etc/rc.conf # because ppp configures it automatically ppp_enable="YES" ppp_mode="ddial" ppp_nat="YES" ppp_profile="myisp" After booting, ifconfig yields this: bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=1a inet6 fe80::211:11ff:febd:be3a%bge0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 ether 00:11:11:bd:be:3a media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP) status: active re0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=1b inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 inet6 fe80::240:f4ff:feb4:841a%re0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 ether 00:40:f4:b4:84:1a media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 tun0: flags=8051 mtu 1492 inet x.x.x.x --> y.y.y.y netmask 0xffffffff Opened by PID 211 Notice that bge0 media is 10baseT/UTP and re0 is 100baseTX Here's what DOESN'T work: (may wrap) ifconfig_re0="inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 media 1000baseTX mediaopt full-duplex" ifconfig_bge0="media 1000baseTX mediaopt full-duplex" # No inet or netmask in ifconfig_bge0, as it is assumed ppp will supply this. When I reboot and run ifconfig, both of these interfaces have "status: no carrier" Does anyone have experience configuring either of these Nics? And, especially, what sort of config options can I use to exploit the faster connect speed on the pppOe interface? Thanks! lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 18:37:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1626216A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:37:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from darryl@osborne-ind.com) Received: from ws1.cnweb.com (ws1.cnweb.com [207.91.1.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F4943D62 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:37:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from darryl@osborne-ind.com) Received: (qmail 21660 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2005 13:37:57 -0500 Received: from p245n23.ruraltel.net (HELO darryl) (24.225.23.245) by barncandle.com with SMTP; 25 Jul 2005 13:37:57 -0500 From: "Darryl Hoar" To: "'Kris Kennaway'" Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:38:08 -0500 Message-ID: <007801c59148$01d66db0$0701a8c0@darryl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20050725163426.GA61019@xor.obsecurity.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: gcc34 build error on Freebsd 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: darryl@osborne-ind.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:37:59 -0000 I had thought that at first, but felt is was the "windows" copout to install a brand new version instead of figuring out the error message. I want to install (not upgrade) a new version on my 5.1 box. Couldn't find pointers for installing (not upgrading) from an existing freebsd box. Also, is 5.4 the most recent release ? -----Original Message----- From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:kris@obsecurity.org] Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 11:34 AM To: Darryl Hoar Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc34 build error on Freebsd 5.1 On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 09:37:02AM -0500, Darryl Hoar wrote: > Greetings, > I have 5.1 running on my machine. I installed cvsup > and upgraded my ports with it. I then went into > /usr/ports/databases/firebird-client and did a make install. > > Of course it installed several other dependencies when > I did that. One thing is was trying to build/install was > gcc34. The following error was generated and the > entire process came to a halt. > > ../.././..//gcc-3.4-20050719/libiberty/fibheap.c:395: warning: implicit > declaration of function `memset' > gmake[2]: *** [fibheap.o] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/lang/gcc34/work/build/i386-portbld-freebsd5.1/libiberty' > gmake[1]: *** [all-target-libiberty] Error 2 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc34/work/build' > gmake: *** [bootstrap-lean] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/gcc34. > *** Error code 1 > > I google'd and searched the freebsd website/mailing list, > FAQ, but didn't find an answer to this problem. > > Anybody have an pointers/help so I can get on with the install ? FYI, 5.1 is very old and long out of support. You should update to a modern release of FreeBSD if you want your port builds (and FreeBSD itself) to work smoothly. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 19:00:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9118916A420 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:00:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fenomenoxp2@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F4A43D49 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:00:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fenomenoxp2@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 50so943672wri for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:00:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=npuMa+c9TgOHVHWOh+G77eiozt2zOguWYjHADUCda7vJPD2zgOC1Jo5swR8DzPoCsG0H8y/THf2vc9LElT0U+OGOsN36kUNUNO6ZUfTi6AY8HVROcz4h57tzlGRUWZic6I/7NZrHLHltR0LGBUR3YGg7RngE+ztV4hlPeLaD9uA= Received: by 10.54.38.57 with SMTP id l57mr2300354wrl; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:00:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.153.4 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:00:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:00:45 +0200 From: Emil Khatib To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <447jfgm9tb.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <44u0iuzvb2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <447jfgm9tb.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Subject: Re: Download ports from another machine X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Emil Khatib List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:00:46 -0000 On 24 Jul 2005 12:46:08 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Don't top-post, please. >=20 > Emil Khatib writes: >=20 > > Well, I just had an idea, as make fetch-recursive-list is unusable in > > windows (unless I make a script or program to read it or I download > > manually each of the packages), I would like to be able to boot a > > FreeBSD system installed on removable media. I have a removable HD but > > I can't boot from it... Is there anyway I could boot the system from a > > floppy using a partition in the removable drive as root? >=20 > Yes, that should be no problem; just break to the loader(8) prompt and > tell it what to use for the root and kernel. >=20 > But I really don't understand the problem; you should be able to take > the *output* of fetch-recursive-list to another system quite easily. > Use a floppy to hold the text, if you want... >=20 well the problem is that what I want is an automated download (I mean, I don't want to download packages one by one). As far as I've seen the output of fetch-recursive-list gives me no possibility to do an automatic download. Anyway I'll tro out the loader prompt. Thanks for you help! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 19:02:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3A016A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:02:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dvv@online.bg) Received: from gandalf.online.bg (gandalf.online.bg [217.75.128.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB76443D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:02:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dvv@online.bg) Received: (qmail 8852 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2005 19:02:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.3?) (217.75.152.84) by gandalf.online.bg with SMTP; 25 Jul 2005 19:02:32 -0000 Message-ID: <42E53745.5010308@online.bg> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:02:29 +0300 From: "dvv@online.bg" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin Thelen References: <42E4AB1A.9040006@online.bg> <42E4BB33.6060009@ccgis.de> In-Reply-To: <42E4BB33.6060009@ccgis.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, dvv@eprogress.bg Subject: Re: PANIC on 6.0-BETA-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:02:41 -0000 Did as advised and reached to full booting system, which complained that no dump devices were found, even when I had specified one in rc.conf. Mergemaster grunts "cannot cd to /usr/src/etc and install files to temproot", when booting in single mode and trying to update the files. cap_mkdb quits on "-l" option passed by another program. I saw http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-February/077661.html and will fight it these days. Finally I tried upgrading from cd and got with kernel panic at the end. I will give the file tomorrow - I'm too exhausted now. Anyway 6.0 will be superb Have a good one, Dimitar > > Hi, > > Just a short shot, as the error message you've posted is not really > talkative, but 'Warning: Device driver "' and 'nvidia_load="YES" in > loader.conf' leads me to the assumption, that your problem is the > nvidia module. Try removing _everything_ that is non-standard, e.g. > everything what loads additional modules! > > Ben > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 19:11:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB16216A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:11:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from darryl@osborne-ind.com) Received: from ws1.cnweb.com (ws1.cnweb.com [207.91.1.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCC443D4C for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:11:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from darryl@osborne-ind.com) Received: (qmail 9154 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2005 14:11:09 -0500 Received: from p245n23.ruraltel.net (HELO darryl) (24.225.23.245) by eveland.net with SMTP; 25 Jul 2005 14:11:09 -0500 From: "Darryl Hoar" To: Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:11:21 -0500 Message-ID: <007901c5914c$a5398740$0701a8c0@darryl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Subject: Install 5.4-Release question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: darryl@osborne-ind.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:11:10 -0000 I have 5.1-release on a box. I want to install 5.4-release (don't want to upgrade). Do I still have to download the .flp and .krn images to floppy, or can I start an ftp install from the running 5.1 box ? thanks, Darryl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 19:17:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B0E16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:17:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: from excite.com (nn6.excitenetwork.com [207.159.120.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A770243D48 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:17:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: by xprdmailfe1.nwk.excite.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 1289A109ED8; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:17:48 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from [84.73.114.198] by xprdmailfe1.nwk.excite.com via HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:17:48 EST X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: ID = 2383e4973664c80f7198bf469d15c13b From: "PK" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: piotrekk@excite.com X-Mailer: PHP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050725191748.1289A109ED8@xprdmailfe1.nwk.excite.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:17:48 -0400 (EDT) Cc: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr, glenn@antimatter.net Subject: Re: cannot install ntop under freeBSD 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: piotrekk@excite.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:17:49 -0000 hi I did what you suggested. I've deinstalled rrdtool completely, tried install ntop but now I get following horrible errors: xmldumpPlugin.c:36:2: warning: #warning xmldumpPlugin.c:37:2: warning: #warning =========================================================== xmldumpPlugin.c:38:2: warning: #warning xmldumpPlugin.c:39:2: warning: #warning The include of gdome.h that follows will generate a lot of xmldumpPlugin.c:40:2: warning: #warning compile warnings about 'shadows a global declaration'. xmldumpPlugin.c:41:2: warning: #warning Unfortunately, it's the way this crud is coded and can't xmldumpPlugin.c:42:2: warning: #warning be fixed. Just ignore them! xmldumpPlugin.c:43:2: warning: #warning In file included from /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib.h:69, from /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:27, from xmldumpPlugin.c:44: /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/gthreadpool.h:88: warning: declaration of 'wait' shadows a global declaration /usr/include/sys/wait.h:103: warning: shadowed declaration is here In file included from xmldumpPlugin.c:44: /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:264: warning: declaration of 'index' shadows a global declaration /usr/include/strings.h:50: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:331: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:483: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:585: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:649: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:694: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:739: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:783: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:801: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:857: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:893: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:935: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:977: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:1013: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:1033: warning: declaration of 'index' shadows a global declaration /usr/include/strings.h:50: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:1044: warning: declaration of 'index' shadows a global declaration /usr/include/strings.h:50: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:1073: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:1112: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here xmldumpPlugin.c:45:2: warning: #warning xmldumpPlugin.c:46:2: warning: #warning =========================================================== xmldumpPlugin.c:47:2: warning: #warning In file included from xmldumpPlugin.c:1165: xml_s_ntopinterface.inc: In function `newxml_ntopinterface': xml_s_ntopinterface.inc:494: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' xml_s_ntopinterface.inc:529: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' xml_s_ntopinterface.inc:565: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' In file included from xmldumpPlugin.c:1429: xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc: In function `newxml_simpleprototrafficinfo': xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:46: error: structure has no member named `lastLocal' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:46: error: structure has no member named `lastLocal' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:52: error: structure has no member named `lastLocal2remote' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:52: error: structure has no member named `lastLocal2remote' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:58: error: structure has no member named `lastRem' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:58: error: structure has no member named `lastRem' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:64: error: structure has no member named `lastRem2local' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:64: error: structure has no member named `lastRem2local' In file included from xmldumpPlugin.c:1693: xml_g_invoke.inc: In function `dumpXML_invoke': xml_g_invoke.inc:71: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' xml_g_invoke.inc:79: error: structure has no member named `accessLogFile' xml_g_invoke.inc:85: error: structure has no member named `enablePacketDecoding' xml_g_invoke.inc:91: error: structure has no member named `stickyHosts' xml_g_invoke.inc:97: error: structure has no member named `daemonMode' xml_g_invoke.inc:103: error: structure has no member named `maxNumLines' xml_g_invoke.inc:110: error: structure has no member named `rFileName' xml_g_invoke.inc:116: error: structure has no member named `trackOnlyLocalHosts' xml_g_invoke.inc:122: error: structure has no member named `devices' xml_g_invoke.inc:128: error: structure has no member named `enableOtherPacketDump' xml_g_invoke.inc:134: error: structure has no member named `filterExpressionInExtraFrame' xml_g_invoke.inc:140: error: structure has no member named `pcapLog' xml_g_invoke.inc:146: error: structure has no member named `localAddresses' xml_g_invoke.inc:152: error: structure has no member named `numericFlag' xml_g_invoke.inc:158: error: structure has no member named `dontTrustMACaddr' xml_g_invoke.inc:164: error: structure has no member named `protoSpecs' xml_g_invoke.inc:170: error: structure has no member named `enableSuspiciousPacketDump' xml_g_invoke.inc:176: error: structure has no member named `refreshRate' xml_g_invoke.inc:183: error: structure has no member named `disablePromiscuousMode' xml_g_invoke.inc:189: error: structure has no member named `traceLevel' xml_g_invoke.inc:196: error: structure has no member named `maxNumHashEntries' xml_g_invoke.inc:203: error: structure has no member named `maxNumSessions' xml_g_invoke.inc:217: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' xml_g_invoke.inc:227: error: structure has no member named `defaultVsan' xml_g_invoke.inc:234: error: structure has no member named `webAddr' xml_g_invoke.inc:240: error: structure has no member named `webPort' xml_g_invoke.inc:247: error: structure has no member named `enableSessionHandling' xml_g_invoke.inc:253: error: structure has no member named `currentFilterExpression' xml_g_invoke.inc:259: error: structure has no member named `domainName' xml_g_invoke.inc:265: error: structure has no member named `flowSpecs' xml_g_invoke.inc:273: error: structure has no member named `debugMode' xml_g_invoke.inc:279: error: structure has no member named `useSyslog' xml_g_invoke.inc:288: error: structure has no member named `mergeInterfaces' xml_g_invoke.inc:294: error: structure has no member named `pcapLogBasePath' xml_g_invoke.inc:300: error: structure has no member named `fcNSCacheFile' xml_g_invoke.inc:318: error: structure has no member named `printFcOnly' xml_g_invoke.inc:324: error: structure has no member named `mapperURL' xml_g_invoke.inc:332: error: structure has no member named `sslAddr' xml_g_invoke.inc:338: error: structure has no member named `sslPort' xml_g_invoke.inc:349: error: structure has no member named `useSSLwatchdog' xml_g_invoke.inc:359: error: structure has no member named `disableSchedYield' xml_g_invoke.inc:367: error: structure has no member named `P3Pcp' xml_g_invoke.inc:373: error: structure has no member named `P3Puri' xml_g_invoke.inc:379: error: structure has no member named `disableStopcap' xml_g_invoke.inc:385: error: structure has no member named `disableInstantSessionPurge' xml_g_invoke.inc:391: error: structure has no member named `noFc' xml_g_invoke.inc:397: error: structure has no member named `noInvalidLunDisplay' xml_g_invoke.inc:403: error: structure has no member named `disableMutexExtraInfo' xml_g_invoke.inc:409: error: structure has no member named `skipVersionCheck' In file included from xmldumpPlugin.c:1730: xml_g_intf.inc: In function `dumpXML_interfaces': xml_g_intf.inc:33: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' gmake[3]: *** [xmldumpPlugin.lo] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/net/ntop. It must be a BUG in the ntop port. greetings piotr --- On Mon 07/25, Glenn Dawson < glenn@antimatter.net > wrote: From: Glenn Dawson [mailto: glenn@antimatter.net] To: piotrekk@excite.com, keramida@ceid.upatras.gr, piotrekk@excite.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 05:54:26 -0700 Subject: Re: cannot install ntop under freeBSD 5.5 At 05:03 AM 7/25/2005, PK wrote:

>hi
>
>It must be a BUG in the freeBSD 5.4 ntop port !
>
>greetings
>Piotr

The problem you are seeing is because the rrd plugin that's part of ntop is
supplying 5 argument to the rrd_graph() function. Which is ok for the
versions of rrd that are bundled with ntop.

However, if you have the rrdtools port installed, it's version of
rrd_graph() is expecting 8 arguments. The error you are getting is because
the prototype for rrd_graph() that comes with rrdtools does not match how
ntop is calling it.

To get around the problem, you can remove the rrdtool port, and then ntop
should build without errors. If you're using rrdtool you can probably
reinstall it once ntop is built. That may cause a problem if rrdtool
installs any shared libraries that ntop uses.

-Glenn





> --- On Mon 07/25, Giorgos Keramidas < keramida@ceid.upatras.gr > wrote:
>From: Giorgos Keramidas [mailto: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr]
>To: piotrekk@excite.com
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:20:05 +0300
>Subject: Re: cannot install ntop under freeBSD 5.5
>
>On 2005-07-24 20:14, PK wrote:
>
>
>hi
>
> I have exact the same problem and get the same
>errors.
>
> to clean a port, reinstall or upgrade ntop or rrdtool
>doesn't help.

Strange. I did build ntop on 6.0-CURRENT a few days
>before the switch
to 7.0-CURRENT was made. I haven't tried to build
>ntop on 5.X though,
so this may be the problem.


>
>_______________________________________________
>Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
>The most personalized portal on the Web!
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

_______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 19:48:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B1416A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:48:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-html@jonathan-glaschke.de) Received: from mail.liberty-hosting.de (mail.liberty-hosting.de [195.225.132.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C84843D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:47:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-html@jonathan-glaschke.de) Received: from mail.liberty-hosting.de ([195.225.132.203]) by localhost (liberty-mail [195.225.132.203]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22797-08 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:47:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jogla.fbsd (p50897816.dip.t-dialin.net [80.137.120.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.liberty-hosting.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB07C158953 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:47:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jogla.fbsd (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jogla.fbsd (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6PLleY4001951 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:47:41 GMT (envelope-from jonathan@jogla.fbsd) Received: (from jonathan@localhost) by jogla.fbsd (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6PLleqn001950 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:47:40 GMT (envelope-from jonathan) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:47:39 +0000 From: Jonathan Glaschke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050725214739.GA1924@jogla.fbsd> References: <007901c5914c$a5398740$0701a8c0@darryl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <007901c5914c$a5398740$0701a8c0@darryl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.liberty-hosting.de Subject: Re: Install 5.4-Release question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:48:00 -0000 Hello, On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 02:11:21PM -0500, Darryl Hoar wrote: > I have 5.1-release on a box. I want to install 5.4-release (don't want to > upgrade). > Do I still have to download the .flp and .krn images to floppy, or can I > start > an ftp install from the running 5.1 box ? > > thanks, > Darryl > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Depends on how you look at it. You perform a binary update via sysintall to 5.4, but that's an upgrade in my eyes and no reinstallation. I think not to update it means that you destroy your old bsd installation and perform a new one. And then you'll need that floppis (or a cdrom drive thats able to handle bootable cds). Jonathan -- | /"\ ASCII Ribbon | Jonathan Glaschke - Lorenz-Görtz-Straße 71, | \ / Campaign Against | 41238 Mönchengladbach, Tel: 02166-265876 | X HTML In Mail | Mobil: 0162-3390789, ICQ: 231021883 | / \ And News | http://jonathan-glaschke.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 20:11:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9A016A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:11:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tobias.fendin@telia.com) Received: from pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.159]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F9D43D48 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:11:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tobias.fendin@telia.com) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (81.229.46.22) by pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.2.060.1) (authenticated as u18317830) id 42B9371700546953 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:11:10 +0200 Message-ID: <42E54758.6000400@telia.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:11:04 +0200 From: Tobias Fendin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050403) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200507251311.15216.lane@joeandlane.com> In-Reply-To: <200507251311.15216.lane@joeandlane.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: pppOe 1000baseTX config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:11:14 -0000 Lane wrote: > > Notice that bge0 media is 10baseT/UTP and re0 is 100baseTX > What kind of network cables are you using? UTP stands for unshielded twisted pair, which doesn't work so well with higher bandwidths. I think 1000baseTX requiers CAT6 cables. -Tobias From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 20:23:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FB516A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:23:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937D243D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:23:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1Dx9Tj-00088I-VP for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:23:12 -0400 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6PKUfWC083889 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:30:41 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j6PKUf57083888 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:30:41 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:30:40 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200507251311.15216.lane@joeandlane.com> <42E54758.6000400@telia.com> In-Reply-To: <42E54758.6000400@telia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507251530.40942.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec791e8f8b28c701c86c3f2cae158586ef8b350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: pppOe 1000baseTX config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:23:13 -0000 On Monday 25 July 2005 15:11, Tobias Fendin wrote: > Lane wrote: > > Notice that bge0 media is 10baseT/UTP and re0 is 100baseTX > > What kind of network cables are you using? > UTP stands for unshielded twisted pair, which doesn't work so well with > higher bandwidths. > I think 1000baseTX requiers CAT6 cables. > > -Tobias > _______________________________________________ Thanks, Tobias. I think that explains it. The box my cable spool came in says "Cat 5E" rats! Shoulda gone with the more expensive stuff (again). Lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 20:25:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43DA16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:25:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@sigd.net) Received: from ms05.mailstreet2003.net (MS05.mailstreet2003.net [63.251.155.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B96243D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:25:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@sigd.net) Received: from 216.253.190.66 ([216.253.190.66]) by ms05.mailstreet2003.net ([10.0.25.5]) via Exchange Front-End Server owa.mailstreet2003.net ([10.0.25.4]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:25:34 +0000 Received: from home.sigd.net by owa.mailstreet2003.net; 25 Jul 2005 15:24:44 -0500 From: Chris Haulmark To: Lane In-Reply-To: <200507251530.40942.lane@joeandlane.com> References: <200507251311.15216.lane@joeandlane.com> <42E54758.6000400@telia.com> <200507251530.40942.lane@joeandlane.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:24:44 -0500 Message-Id: <1122323084.50431.0.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pppOe 1000baseTX config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: chris@sigd.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:25:36 -0000 On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 15:30 -0500, Lane wrote: > On Monday 25 July 2005 15:11, Tobias Fendin wrote: > > Lane wrote: > > > Notice that bge0 media is 10baseT/UTP and re0 is 100baseTX > > > > What kind of network cables are you using? > > UTP stands for unshielded twisted pair, which doesn't work so well with > > higher bandwidths. > > I think 1000baseTX requiers CAT6 cables. Cat5e supports gigabit speeds. > > > > -Tobias > > _______________________________________________ > Thanks, Tobias. > > I think that explains it. The box my cable spool came in says "Cat 5E" > > rats! Shoulda gone with the more expensive stuff (again). > > Lane > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 20:38:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DAC16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:38:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john@day-light.com) Received: from joseph.day-light.net (gabriel.day-light.net [209.145.160.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B54E143D49 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:38:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john@day-light.com) Received: from w1 (unknown [10.1.5.36]) by joseph.day-light.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 9521F4F3E2; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:38:24 -0500 (CDT) From: "John Brooks" To: "Lane" , Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:38:26 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <200507251311.15216.lane@joeandlane.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: pppOe 1000baseTX config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: john@day-light.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:38:26 -0000 > > I've recently switched from a Netgear router to use pppOe for my public > internet ip on FreeBSD 5.4. > > My machine has two nics: bge0 and re0, both of which support 1000baseTX > configurations, however neither of the two seem to be able to > connect when I > configure them in /etc/rc.conf. Here's what works: > correct me if this is a wrong assumption, this is a dsl line?? what do you expect to gain here? forcing 1000baseTX on the NIC won't speed up the dsl line. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 20:42:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87CB16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:42:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E2543D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:42:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fields.fields.utoronto.ca (fields.localdomain [192.168.216.11]) by fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields 6.0) with ESMTP id j6PKgANV023790 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:42:10 -0400 Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (fields.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.11]) by fields.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields WS 6.0) with ESMTP id j6PKg96P015762; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:42:10 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C45CC51455; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:42:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:42:05 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Darryl Hoar Message-ID: <20050725204205.GA30872@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050725163426.GA61019@xor.obsecurity.org> <007801c59148$01d66db0$0701a8c0@darryl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <007801c59148$01d66db0$0701a8c0@darryl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, 'Kris Kennaway' Subject: Re: gcc34 build error on Freebsd 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:42:12 -0000 --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 01:38:08PM -0500, Darryl Hoar wrote: > I had thought that at first, but felt is was the=20 > "windows" copout to install a brand new version > instead of figuring out the error message. While it is surely possible to figure out the problem and solve it, this may involve some significant diagnosis and surgery on your part, and it will probably be easier for you to just update to a version where you know that the software is buildable. > I want to install (not upgrade) a new version > on my 5.1 box. Couldn't find pointers for > installing (not upgrading) from an existing=20 > freebsd box. You just install as you always would, e.g. by downloading a CD image. If you don't want to have to reconfigure your system (e.g. /etc, etc) then you use the 'upgrade' facility of sysinstall. All of this is documented in the installation instructions distributed with the release, and on the website. > Also, is 5.4 the most recent release ? Yes. Kris --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC5U6dWry0BWjoQKURAqDOAJ403bigFdmjamWDmXp4Bk7VKK4RiQCgnaCM 90jrZNstYEclfYWRBLWJB74= =Sldp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 20:44:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E4016A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:44:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3601343D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:44:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fields.fields.utoronto.ca (fields.localdomain [192.168.216.11]) by fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields 6.0) with ESMTP id j6PKiNNV024006 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:44:23 -0400 Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (fields.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.11]) by fields.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields WS 6.0) with ESMTP id j6PKiN6P015938; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:44:23 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B78D751455; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:44:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:44:19 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Emil Khatib Message-ID: <20050725204419.GB30872@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <44u0iuzvb2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <447jfgm9tb.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="p4qYPpj5QlsIQJ0K" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Download ports from another machine X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:44:24 -0000 --p4qYPpj5QlsIQJ0K Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 09:00:45PM +0200, Emil Khatib wrote: > On 24 Jul 2005 12:46:08 -0400, Lowell Gilbert > wrote: > > Don't top-post, please. > >=20 > > Emil Khatib writes: > >=20 > > > Well, I just had an idea, as make fetch-recursive-list is unusable in > > > windows (unless I make a script or program to read it or I download > > > manually each of the packages), I would like to be able to boot a > > > FreeBSD system installed on removable media. I have a removable HD but > > > I can't boot from it... Is there anyway I could boot the system from a > > > floppy using a partition in the removable drive as root? > >=20 > > Yes, that should be no problem; just break to the loader(8) prompt and > > tell it what to use for the root and kernel. > >=20 > > But I really don't understand the problem; you should be able to take > > the *output* of fetch-recursive-list to another system quite easily. > > Use a floppy to hold the text, if you want... > >=20 > well the problem is that what I want is an automated download (I mean, > I don't want to download packages one by one). As far as I've seen the > output of fetch-recursive-list gives me no possibility to do an > automatic download. Anyway I'll tro out the loader prompt. Thanks for > you help! Look into FreeSBIE, which is a bootable CD image distribution of FreeBSD. You can boot this on another machine, mount the hard drive and fetch your ports there. Kris --p4qYPpj5QlsIQJ0K Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC5U8jWry0BWjoQKURAsn8AKDe3ijnbZh16SEZ8YZVrxdrbkTEhwCglqD0 7zCTPsrTSrIi8vgP7DqnE1Y= =iq57 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --p4qYPpj5QlsIQJ0K-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 20:45:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05BAE16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:45:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from apredoehl@go.mailsvc.com) Received: from mailsvc.com (mail.mailsvc.com [63.247.192.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A7A43D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:45:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from apredoehl@go.mailsvc.com) Received: by mailsvc.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.3.2) with PIPE id 246981444; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:45:21 -0600 Received: from [66.44.1.136] (account apredoehl@go.mailsvc.com) by mailsvc.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.3.2) with HTTP id 246981256 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:44:45 -0600 From: "Andrew Predoehl" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.3.2 Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:44:45 -0600 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200507251830.54988.lofi@freebsd.org> References: <200507251830.54988.lofi@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CIT-MailScanner-Information: Please contact 719-473-2800 for more information X-CIT-MailScanner-MS2: Not scanned for viruses: Contact Colorado Information Technologies at 1-866-469-3310 to add Virus and Spam filtering services X-CIT-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-MailScanner-From: apredoehl@go.mailsvc.com Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] KPovModeler port problem: why no OpenGL? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:45:22 -0000 On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:30:54 +0200 Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Saturday, 23. July 2005 02:56, Andrew Predoehl wrote: >> I found a problem when I recompiled the >> graphics/kdegraphics3 port; the build and install were >> OK, but now when I run KPovModeler, it tells me, "No >> OpenGL support" and does not show wireframes anymore. > >> Does anyone know how to fix this? Should I just give >> up and use a package? Do I need to install Mesa? > > You need to enable OpenGL/GLX support in X. How to do > that depends on the graphics hardware (and X drivers) > you're using and is beyond the scope of this > mailing-list (kde@freebsd.org). > > You can check the current state of things with the >'glxinfo' command: When you > run it, it should *not* output any sort of 'Xlib: > extension "GLX" missing on > display ":0.0"' messages. Thanks, Michael. I had made the mistake of assuming the problem was with the port configure or compile, and not my xorg.conf! It works fine now. As they say, "If you know how to do it, it's easy." AMP From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 20:49:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297A916A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:49:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29EE43D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:49:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1Dx9sj-0004lv-4R for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:49:01 -0400 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6PKuTfw084532 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:56:29 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j6PKuQVd084529 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:56:26 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:56:26 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507251556.26672.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79a1f5dd70ecb2e98b63df5f20cea274df350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: pppOe 1000baseTX config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:49:02 -0000 On Monday 25 July 2005 15:38, John Brooks wrote: > > I've recently switched from a Netgear router to use pppOe for my public > > internet ip on FreeBSD 5.4. > > > > My machine has two nics: bge0 and re0, both of which support 1000baseTX > > configurations, however neither of the two seem to be able to > > connect when I > > configure them in /etc/rc.conf. Here's what works: > > correct me if this is a wrong assumption, this is a dsl line?? > > what do you expect to gain here? forcing 1000baseTX on the NIC won't > speed up the dsl line. > _______________________________________________ Is there any speed advatage possible beyond the (10baseT/UTP)? If not then I guess it doesn't matter. The dsl modem is on bge0, which ifconfig reports as bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500         options=1a         inet6 fe80::211:11ff:febd:be3a%bge0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1         ether 00:11:11:bd:be:3a         media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP) My expectation (hope) is to change the "10base" in the media: line to "100base" or "1000base" to gain any throughput advantage that is possible. The internal network is on re0, which ifconfig reports as re0: flags=8843 mtu 1500         options=1b         inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255         inet6 fe80::240:f4ff:feb4:841a%re0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2         ether 00:40:f4:b4:84:1a         media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX )         status: active I'd like the change the "100base" in the media: line to a "1000base", if possible. thanks for your eyes! lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 20:49:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E7916A421 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:49:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from mail.eyfa.org (eyfa.demon.nl [212.238.155.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F162E43D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:49:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: by mail.eyfa.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BA1173C694E; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:50:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:50:02 +0200 From: albi To: Chris Haulmark Message-ID: <20050725205002.GA31920@ssh.eyfa.org> References: <200507251311.15216.lane@joeandlane.com> <42E54758.6000400@telia.com> <200507251530.40942.lane@joeandlane.com> <1122323084.50431.0.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1122323084.50431.0.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Lane , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pppOe 1000baseTX config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:49:11 -0000 On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 03:24:44PM -0500, Chris Haulmark wrote: > On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 15:30 -0500, Lane wrote: > > > I think 1000baseTX requiers CAT6 cables. > > Cat5e supports gigabit speeds. a few days ago i bought a crosslink cat 5e cable saying "shielded RJ45 10-100MBPS", (and it would not do 1 Gigabit transfers after setting it up with 2 1Gigabit cards between 2 FreeBSD-boxes point-to-point) ..i'd like to know The Truth (TM) now :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 20:53:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A8216A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:53:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@ricin.com) Received: from smtpq2.home.nl (smtpq2.home.nl [213.51.128.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79E543D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:53:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@ricin.com) Received: from [213.51.128.134] (port=43407 helo=smtp3.home.nl) by smtpq2.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Dx9xP-00019X-GB; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:53:51 +0200 Received: from cp464173-a.dbsch1.nb.home.nl ([84.27.215.228]:64662 helo=desktop.homenet) by smtp3.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Dx9xO-0000HM-H4; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:53:50 +0200 From: Danny Pansters To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:51:55 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <890a507f05072509526407a4df@mail.gmail.com> <8qoe8q2433.e8q@mail.opusnet.com> In-Reply-To: <8qoe8q2433.e8q@mail.opusnet.com> X-Face: "0Qv=,p:+]LvuqrtS4U\z3k"qN=.1]@=?utf-8?q?=258=3F=3BPoab=23v=27F=7E=0A=09!Wm=5Fe-=24=7EL=5D=3B?=>[c*L^Qoladj)x@mH}Bqz"vLO?Zdl}[@V@=?utf-8?q?U=3Fx3=23lI=3A=0A=09=24DN=7E!Hr?=@K`-mNv"zXm MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507252251.56256.danny@ricin.com> X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean Cc: "Gary W. Swearingen" Subject: Re: Problem report rejected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:53:54 -0000 On Monday 25 July 2005 19:22, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: > jackqq writes: > > <<< 450 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [60.26.7.157] > > ... Deferred: 450 Client host > > rejected: cannot find your hostname, [60.26.7.157] > > ... > > > I'm an ADSL subscriber, and I have dynamic IP addresses, and my ISP > > I am too, and saw as similar msg when first got going after installing > a new OS version. A change in the sendmail config was needed. IIRC, > all you need to do is do the "make" stuff in /etc/mail after removing > "dnl " and fixing 2nd arg in this line of the appropriate ".mc" file: > > dnl define(`SMART_HOST', `your.isp.mail.server') I even had to mutilate the .cf to get it to work (not only do I need to use my cable provider's smtp server but I'm also behind a nat so reverse dns was also a problem). After making world it had to be restored. > > SMTP on my machine currently, and I enable sendmail only for > > convenience for applications like send-pr. > > Last time I tried send-pr (years ago) it wouldn't work with my > sendmail config and I've been using regular mail (from a PR template > based on output of "send-pr -P") ever since. Been there done that. And then it turned out that KMail (to be exact: the qt textedit widget IIRC) handle[s][d] tabs wrongly resulting in a PR with an incorrect Makefile... the fun never ends. The web form is not tab safe either, last time I tried (most certainly the same cause). I've found a resonable solution for this in the ssmtp port. The only thing is that I get my system mail relayed through my cable provider (From: "Root" ) and landing in my POP account, at a hosting provider where I have my domain and email. I haven't bothered to find a solution for this yet. I kinda learnt to like it. There are always workarounds, but really such hurdles just shouldn't be there. OP: > > I had a carbon copy of the PR message sent to, and received by, my > > mailbox at GMail. May I, if fortunately enough, forward my copy at > > GMail to freebsd.org to submit the problem report? You can simply forward or resend it to gnats (the original wont ever be accepted), though you may need to attach your diff or shar as an attachment (plain text or uuencoded are both accepted AFAIK). And have a go at ssmtp, set mailwrapper accordingly. HTH, Dan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 20:54:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C659F16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:54:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from mail.digitalfreaks.org (arbitor.digitalfreaks.org [216.151.95.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8507143D49 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:54:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix, from userid 1022) id 9DE1331980B; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:54:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C77031F406 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:54:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:54:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brian A. Seklecki" X-X-Sender: lavalamp@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050725164602.B31613@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Dell Powervault 120T / ADIC FastStor DLT D116 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:54:27 -0000 I just connected a Dell Powervault 120T to an Adaptec AHA-2944 HVD ("High Voltage Differential") controller and the resulting dmesg indicates what is probed by my RELENG_5_3 kernel: ahc0: port 0xe400-0xe4ff mem 0xe9001000-0xe9001fff irq 5 at device 11.0 on pci0 sa1 at ahc1 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 sa1: Removable Sequential Access SCSI-3 device sa1: 40.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 32) pass0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 pass0: Removable Changer SCSI-2 device pass0: 3.300MB/s transfers For some reason, the tape changer is probing as pass(4) instead of ch(4). Any ideas why? SCSI devices have a "device class" designation, IIRC. However, I can't get useful debugging out of camcontrol(8) w/ recompiling the kernel w/ DEBUG options. I'm going to do that now, but any ideas would be appreciated. l8* -lava x.25 - minix - bitnet - plan9 - 110 bps - ASR 33 - base8 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 21:24:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ABE116A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:24:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from slas7713@yahoo.com) Received: from web33605.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33605.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.199.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9816C43D48 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:24:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from slas7713@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 64413 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Jul 2005 21:24:11 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=IZPzjdar1zBrvzeBGeKTjzMZiJMaEIRzB2ka8d1NPbFBm/2LwGQSRpsiA+ruJg/ODRgfeUXutP21WSDW0woSHBJfZd1Iy8ysCtlZ02KX7yw/eo9iTZuxRT06JLmcVqWaecGrn1pIcC33L0lZ9ShEEeZ0qKJ1FlKC7On/8fViZIY= ; Message-ID: <20050725212411.64411.qmail@web33605.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.216.129.249] by web33605.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:24:11 PDT Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:24:11 -0700 (PDT) From: steve lasiter To: free bsd MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: oscommerce issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:24:12 -0000 I've fought with this for a couple of day and now it's time to ask. I'm running FreeBSD 5.4 with Apache 1.3, MySQL5.0.2, PHP5.0.3_2 and a fresh install of OScommerce. First Question: During my first attempt to access the /oscommerce/catalog/admin directory I got the register_globals turned off error, modify php.ini. I modified my VirtualHost entry in my Apache httpd.conf file and added the line "php_value register_globals "on"" I'm worried about security issues with this. Is there any more info you can give me on this or a better fix. Second Question: Now when hen attempting to access the /oscommerce/catalog/admin directroy I'm getting the error: "1046 - No database selected Select configuration_key as cfgKey, configuration_value as cfgValue from configuration" I have configured the "configure.php" file (many times now) with the proper database connection info and successfully tested connectivity to my database. Is there any info on this problem. Also, if there is anyone that I might be able to contact to get more info on OScommerce with FreeBSD I'd love to get other general questions answered. Thanks for the help in advance, Dean Lasiter __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 21:41:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A0116A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:41:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lei.sun@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BC443D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:41:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lei.sun@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 55so1056800wri for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:41:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Uz7yJZLYRliWcyG+QMyBNg5u9Dk0/P8Iak4ryU0hh5aOWd7ilrDPuh7Srl8S8HkzG0WnwNgE0PVszX7l6ComYeLqYJkp+aytz/k0KFtjVgAEZfK9Tf/+P/WBU54MnNCeYuCkB3K5VpYQifBFn5oKHlKYSSUXUAvYGeXEMHILnaA= Received: by 10.54.49.26 with SMTP id w26mr2298938wrw; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.6.70 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:41:53 -0700 From: Lei Sun To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: ssh over a very bad http proxy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lei Sun List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:41:54 -0000 Hi=20 I spent almost entire week, customizing my freebsd server at home, and now, I would like to access it from my work place. But it doesn't seems to be possible without making http tunnels through an authenticated proxy server. I tried to use http-tunnel, it doesn't support the authenticated feature. I tried to use corkscrew, it can't compile on cygwin, and it can't go through the authenticated proxy either on solaris. I tried the HTTPTunnelClient with ntlmaps-0.9.9, it says it is connected, but putty just hangs and doesn't give me any response. I googled almost for a week now, trying to find a good solution, but no luck so far. I am sure that I am not the first one who is encountering this kind of prob= lem. Any suggestions?=20 Thanks in advance. Lei From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 21:43:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83CDB16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:43:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lei.sun@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2336D43D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:43:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lei.sun@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 55so1057038wri for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:43:36 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=qhYijtV98wJU5VuEvibNHx8B9y5FaQhVF0pOdhSyKAqpjMWmYd85kbJ9f1ghuPQhCaWyu8dYfnAHKu0ZnZl+Kq6p6SFil46LMyMLXXqCEvNunz5WzTuxqq1K14RQgUx7Ls5pnD3XRHwCe6zGi9WD7yW8asTvDXCi1UVL7bEF1Co= Received: by 10.54.29.50 with SMTP id c50mr2292170wrc; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:43:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.6.70 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:43:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:43:36 -0700 From: Lei Sun To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: ssh over a very bad http proxy :( X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lei Sun List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:43:37 -0000 Hi=20 I spent almost entire week, customizing my freebsd server at home, and I would like to access it from my work place. But it doesn't seems to be possible without making http tunnels through an authenticated proxy server. I tried to use http-tunnel, it doesn't support the authenticated feature. I tried to use corkscrew, it can't compile on cygwin, and it can't go through the authenticated proxy either on solaris. I tried the HTTPTunnelClient with ntlmaps-0.9.9, it says it is connected, but putty just hangs and doesn't give me any response. I googled almost for a week now, trying to find a good solution, but no luck so far. I am sure that I am not the first one who is encountering this kind of prob= lem. Any suggestions?=20 Thanks in advance. Lei From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 21:51:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C537216A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:51:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tobias.fendin@telia.com) Received: from pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.159]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679B043D4C for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:51:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tobias.fendin@telia.com) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (81.229.46.22) by pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.2.060.1) (authenticated as u18317830) id 42B93717005494AF for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:51:22 +0200 Message-ID: <42E55ED4.7040004@telia.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:51:16 +0200 From: Tobias Fendin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050403) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200507251311.15216.lane@joeandlane.com> <42E54758.6000400@telia.com> <200507251530.40942.lane@joeandlane.com> <1122323084.50431.0.camel@localhost> <20050725205002.GA31920@ssh.eyfa.org> In-Reply-To: <20050725205002.GA31920@ssh.eyfa.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: pppOe 1000baseTX config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:51:23 -0000 albi wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 03:24:44PM -0500, Chris Haulmark wrote: > >>On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 15:30 -0500, Lane wrote: >> >>>>I think 1000baseTX requiers CAT6 cables. >> >>Cat5e supports gigabit speeds. > > > a few days ago i bought a crosslink cat 5e cable > saying "shielded RJ45 10-100MBPS", > (and it would not do 1 Gigabit transfers after setting it up with 2 1Gigabit > cards between 2 FreeBSD-boxes point-to-point) > > ..i'd like to know The Truth (TM) now :-) Sorry, I was wrong, 1000baseTX works on CAT5e cabels. -Tobias From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 21:57:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3A016A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:57:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from estover@nativenerds.com) Received: from mail.nativenerds.com (host-70-0-111-24.midco.net [24.111.0.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C93143D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:57:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from estover@nativenerds.com) Received: from mail.nativenerds.com (localhost.nativenerds.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nativenerds.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6PMEubD054312 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:14:56 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from estover@nativenerds.com) Received: (from www@localhost) by mail.nativenerds.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j6PMEujF054311; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:14:56 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from estover@nativenerds.com) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.nativenerds.com: www set sender to estover@nativenerds.com using -f Received: from 208.34.9.238 (SquirrelMail authenticated user estover); by mail.nativenerds.com with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:14:55 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <32995.208.34.9.238.1122329695.squirrel@208.34.9.238> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:14:55 -0600 (MDT) From: estover@nativenerds.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.85.1/991/Mon Jul 25 02:55:11 2005 on mail.nativenerds.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mail.nativenerds.com Subject: Re: ssh over a very bad http proxy :( X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:57:46 -0000 > Hi > > I spent almost entire week, customizing my freebsd server at home, and > I would like to access it from my work place. > > But it doesn't seems to be possible without making http tunnels > through an authenticated proxy server. > > I tried to use http-tunnel, it doesn't support the authenticated feature. > I tried to use corkscrew, it can't compile on cygwin, and it can't go > through the authenticated proxy either on solaris. > I tried the HTTPTunnelClient with ntlmaps-0.9.9, it says it is > connected, but putty just hangs and doesn't give me any response. > > I googled almost for a week now, trying to find a good solution, but > no luck so far. > > I am sure that I am not the first one who is encountering this kind of > problem. > > Any suggestions? > > Thanks in advance. > > Lei I just run sshd on port 80, then to connect, ssh -p80 -l ieatpaste www.myhouseorg.ru ;) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 22:30:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111F916A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:30:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd01@dgmm.net) Received: from lon-mail-3.gradwell.net (lon-mail-3.gradwell.net [193.111.201.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA9543D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:30:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd01@dgmm.net) Received: from 82-39-75-228.cable.ubr02.jarr.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.39.75.228] helo=webmaker@asgard.uk) by lon-mail-3.gradwell.net with esmtp (Gradwell gwh-smtpd 1.187) id 42e567f1.c329.1c for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:30:09 +0100 (envelope-sender ) From: dgmm To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:30:05 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <42E30F39.4050804@nawcom.no-ip.com> In-Reply-To: <42E30F39.4050804@nawcom.no-ip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507252330.06181.freebsd01@dgmm.net> Subject: Re: making dvd from videos. (- hey you're lucky!) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:30:11 -0000 On Sunday 24 July 2005 04:47, nawcom wrote: > heres a script for converting your classic codec based avi file to a VOB > file for burning onto a DVD. i didnt test the program out, but i did > check to make sure it's freebsd compatible. and luckly all of the needed > programs are in /usr/ports/multimedia. You're lucky! > http://inferno.slug.org/cgi-bin/wiki?AviToVob > it looks like it does the following: > -1. use mencoder to pull the video out of its container format or codec, > -2. use mplayer to extract the audio channels into a separate file > -3. converts the audio into an MP2 file > -4. use transcode to convert the new avi into a VCD/SVCD compliant m2v > file -5. use mplex to group the m2v and mp2 file to a full working mpg -6. > use dvdauthor to make a legit folder containing the video file, title > info, etc. im sure you can modify it to your needs. > -7. use mkisofs to create an iso file out of the folder > -8. use dvdrecord to burn the fucker. > > 8 steps in one shell script. not that bad huh. i may bookmark this page > for future use. > -Ben You can do it with just mencoder too. mencoder -of mpeg -vf scale=720:576 -ovc lavc -lavcopts vcodec=mpeg2video:mbd=2:keyint=25:vrc_minrate=600:vbitrate=2500 -oac lavc -af lavcresample=44100 -srate44100 -mpegopts format=mpeg2 infile.avi -o outfile.mpg Not sure about all the settings in that, it's a while since I used it. The bitrates above may or may not be correct. I'd strongly suggest anyone using mplayer/mencoder read the mplayer and mencoder users list linked from the mplayer home page. -- Dave From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 22:40:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4159116A440 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:40:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB4443D8B for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:40:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [82.41.37.55] ([82.41.37.55]) by smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:41:17 +0100 Message-ID: <42E56A60.7040206@dial.pipex.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:40:32 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050530 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Omar Thameen References: <20050725101147.GA79920@biglist.com> In-Reply-To: <20050725101147.GA79920@biglist.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jul 2005 22:41:18.0007 (UTC) FILETIME=[F8B40C70:01C59169] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsdlabel and moving to a bigger drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:40:46 -0000 Omar Thameen wrote: >I had sysinstall create all the filesystems on /mnt so I could do >the dump/restore. Because there was no / partition (it was "/mnt" >on the new drive), sysinstall did not create an ad2s1a partition. >The / partition on the new drive is thus ad2s1d. > > > This is easy, if a little tedious, to fix at sysinstall time. Create the new / partition and call it / (NOT /mnt). It will be e.g. ad0s1a Then change the mount point to /mnt and turn off softupdates. The partition will remain a. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 23:32:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73B916A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:32:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from djh@nebcorp.com) Received: from ratchet.nebcorp.com (ratchet.nebcorp.com [205.217.153.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23F643D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:32:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from djh@nebcorp.com) Received: by ratchet.nebcorp.com (Postfix, from userid 1014) id 42CD6D9825; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:32:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:32:25 -0700 From: Danny Howard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050725233225.GA24353@ratchet.nebcorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Loop: djhoward@uiuc.edu Subject: CARP Load-Balancing? (Or, HTTP peer load balancing?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:32:26 -0000 Hello, I am looking at building a tiered web application (web layer, DB layer) and am wondering about configuring automatic failover for the web layer. If possible, I'd like to avoid having to implement a third firewall / balancing tier, but if I must, I shall do that ... I am looking at CARP. The documentation seems soarse, and it sounds like the "load balancing" option isn't much of an option. On the other hand, I could set multiple vhids, one per web server, and rig it up so that if one web server drops its interface, another will answer for it. Then "load balancing" is as simple as putting multiple web server IPs in for the A record ... (With CARP basically functioning as a "heartbeat" monitor ...) Does that sound sensible? I'm feeling a bit wary of this approach. Any suggestions for handling failover of HTTP among peers? Thanks, -danny From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 00:37:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8CD16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:37:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E382143D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:37:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6Q0bkhi010711 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:37:46 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050725173037.1ace0ba0@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: glenn@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:34:13 -0700 To: piotrekk@excite.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <20050725191748.1289A109ED8@xprdmailfe1.nwk.excite.com> References: <20050725191748.1289A109ED8@xprdmailfe1.nwk.excite.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Subject: Re: cannot install ntop under freeBSD 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:37:51 -0000 At 12:17 PM 7/25/2005, PK wrote: >hi > >I did what you suggested. >I've deinstalled rrdtool completely, tried install ntop but now I get >following horrible errors: > > >xmldumpPlugin.c:36:2: warning: #warning >xmldumpPlugin.c:37:2: warning: #warning >=========================================================== >xmldumpPlugin.c:38:2: warning: #warning >xmldumpPlugin.c:39:2: warning: #warning The include of gdome.h that >follows will generate a lot of >xmldumpPlugin.c:40:2: warning: #warning compile warnings about 'shadows a >global declaration'. >xmldumpPlugin.c:41:2: warning: #warning Unfortunately, it's the way this >crud is coded and can't >xmldumpPlugin.c:42:2: warning: #warning be fixed. Just ignore them! >xmldumpPlugin.c:43:2: warning: #warning >[snip] >In file included from xmldumpPlugin.c:1730: >xml_g_intf.inc: In function `dumpXML_interfaces': >xml_g_intf.inc:33: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' >gmake[3]: *** [xmldumpPlugin.lo] Error 1 >gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins' >gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 >gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins' >gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 >gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop' >gmake: *** [all] Error 2 >*** Error code 2 > >Stop in /usr/ports/net/ntop. > > >It must be a BUG in the ntop port. The problem is in the XML plugin. If you don't need that, ntop will build properly without the XML plugin. -Glenn >greetings >piotr From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 00:52:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B823816A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:52:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@auscert.org.au) Received: from titania.auscert.org.au (gw.auscert.org.au [203.5.112.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB5843D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:52:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@auscert.org.au) Received: from app.auscert.org.au (app [10.0.1.192]) by titania.auscert.org.au (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6Q0oamG039203 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:50:36 +1000 (EST) Received: from app.auscert.org.au (localhost.auscert.org.au [127.0.0.1]) by app.auscert.org.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6Q0qPYj020484 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:52:25 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@auscert.org.au) Message-Id: <200507260052.j6Q0qPYj020484@app.auscert.org.au> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org from: freebsd-questions@auscert.org.au In-Reply-To: Your message of "25 Jul 2005 13:26:10 -0400." <44fyu2n6fh.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:52:25 +1000 Subject: Re: How to create mtree files? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:52:27 -0000 > freebsd-questions@auscert.org.au writes: > > > I would like to use the mtree utility to confirm no changes have > > occurred to system files since 'make installworld', similar to that > > possible with 'mtree -f /cdrom/5.4-RELEASE/base/base.mtree' on a > > release installation. This would also give the added advantage of > > being able to determine the current buildlevel of an installed > > system, I believe. Is it possible/easy to create new mtree files > > after the buildworld or installworld process? I've looked at the > > Release Engineering docs but it seems more than what I'd like to > > do. I should add that I am running tripwire, but I really want to > > have a quick way to verify which files were part of which installworld. > > "man 8 mtree" has full details. > > "mtree -c -p /" is the start of what you're looking for. Thanks - I misinterpreted what the '-c' flag does, but after running your example it all makes sense now. To wrap this up for me, is mtree the way to maintain a record of at what level a particular build was performed? In other words, using 'uname -a' tells me when the kernel was built, but what best tells me when /usr/bin/telnet was patched and built and against what source? cheers, -- Joel Hatton -- Security Analyst | Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417 AusCERT - Australia's national CERT | Fax: +61 7 3365 7031 The University of Queensland | WWW: www.auscert.org.au Qld 4072 Australia | Email: auscert@auscert.org.au From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 01:49:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8914016A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:49:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21BAA43D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:49:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.247.55] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A68132640146; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:48:49 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6Q1oA9L009722; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:50:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6Q1o1fX009721; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:50:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: Glenn Dawson References: <1f75ab0e05072510117c119a1d@mail.gmail.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050725103726.10b56b50@cobalt.antimatter.net> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:50:00 -0700 In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20050725103726.10b56b50@cobalt.antimatter.net> (Glenn Dawson's message of "Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:38:31 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Brian Henning , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: burncd - verify burn X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:49:36 -0000 Glenn Dawson writes: > did you use bs=2048 when dd'ing from /dev/acd0? Sure did. And didn't read too many blocks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 02:02:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61C416A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 02:02:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krinklyfig@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C4A43D49 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 02:02:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krinklyfig@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z6so553411nzd for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:02:24 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=l8VkvgZgumJdi2jMX91OhnKeJDFAgSHY5juCSu/VtfIMUgI+u9Yvce3PReTPCeIAe+uFttW+wpqGWa2Wmcnphe2902r8f4y8Z3dz98dQdl7ilyuWaZnDN6fLiTbB9+J1UcGcLdJpjugHekyvIodkKKj5OvSU5G4x/4Jo2Hgj+Rs= Received: by 10.36.97.19 with SMTP id u19mr2300357nzb; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:02:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smogmonster.local ([68.35.114.183]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 20sm1518061nzp.2005.07.25.19.02.23; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:02:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Joshua Tinnin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:02:12 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <20050725175821.GA73763@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> In-Reply-To: <20050725175821.GA73763@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507252002.13406.krinklyfig@gmail.com> Cc: cpghost , "Galdes, Andrew \(ERHS\)" Subject: Re: FreeBSD is Very slow to load some sites X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 02:02:26 -0000 On Mon 25 Jul 05 11:58, cpghost wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 08:27:37AM +0930, Galdes, Andrew (ERHS) wrote: > > Freebsd seems to take a long time (up to ten minutes) to load some > > web sites. When i use Linux or Windows it seems to load at normal > > speed. I have installed Freebsd (same version) on another computer > > and it has the same trouble. I have tried both firefox and > > konqueror. > > > > The website is www.anz.com.au. I suspect the security of the site > > is the problem but cannot be sure. > > A bit sluggish here with Firefox 1.0.5 (from ports). Page loads in > approx 30 seconds. Once the page is loaded, other pages are served > almost instantly. Stopping firefox and restarting it, results in the > same initial delay. > > With w3m, every page access results in that approx 30 secs delay; > perhaps because w3m doesn't keep the connection open? > > > Another thread on this list "[kde-freebsd] Konqueror very slow > > displaying some sites" puts it down to DNS. Any ideas? > > It could be DNS related. I've run > $ truss w3m http://www.anz.com.au/ > > after mounting /proc, and most of the waiting time is spent querying > the local DNS server. After getting a reply from the DNS server, > everything starts running smoothing and fast again: Same with me. Something looks to be getting hung up when Optus gets a hold of it ... traceroute: Warning: www.anz.com.au has multiple addresses; using 202.2.59.40 traceroute to www.anz.com (202.2.59.40), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1) 0.315 ms 0.329 ms 0.259 ms 2 10.96.0.1 (10.96.0.1) 9.581 ms 25.078 ms 7.953 ms 3 68.86.206.1 (68.86.206.1) 7.827 ms 21.153 ms 17.441 ms 4 68.35.172.50 (68.35.172.50) 20.508 ms 15.518 ms 11.161 ms 5 12.118.225.9 (12.118.225.9) 25.360 ms 24.751 ms 27.361 ms 6 tbr2-p013801.dlstx.ip.att.net (12.123.17.62) 42.810 ms 49.479 ms 31.743 ms 7 12.122.81.193 (12.122.81.193) 27.721 ms 27.942 ms 29.533 ms 8 att-gw.dfw.level3.net (192.205.32.114) 31.610 ms 28.780 ms * 9 ae-1-52.bbr2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.122.33) 25.426 ms 26.707 ms 26.912 ms 10 ae-0-0.bbr1.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (64.159.1.125) 89.667 ms as-1-0.bbr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (64.159.0.246) 74.529 ms 70.403 ms 11 ae-14-55.car4.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.68.102.143) 67.398 ms ae-24-54.car4.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.68.102.111) 66.374 ms ae-14-53.car4.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.68.102.79) 66.282 ms 12 gw.level3-lax.singtel.net (63.209.82.186) 55.746 ms 55.305 ms 56.937 ms 13 203.208.148.74 (203.208.148.74) 209.921 ms 215.540 ms 203.208.148.70 (203.208.148.70) 211.747 ms 14 GigEth5-0-0.sb3.optus.net.au (202.139.191.23) 223.199 ms 219.575 ms 226.671 ms 15 * * ANZBankLtd.sb3.optus.net.au (61.88.168.182) 254.522 ms !X 16 ANZBankLtd.sb3.optus.net.au (61.88.168.182) 251.225 ms !X * * 17 * * ANZBankLtd.sb3.optus.net.au (61.88.168.182) 233.469 ms !X 18 * ANZBankLtd.sb3.optus.net.au (61.88.168.182) 259.433 ms !X 235.769 ms !X - jt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 02:14:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5868616A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 02:14:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0398843D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 02:14:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from BLUELAPIS.sentex.ca (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with SMTP id j6Q2EU98015785; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:14:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) From: Mike Tancsa To: Sean Hafeez Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:14:33 -0400 Message-ID: References: <5124A2BF-BD43-434F-9B3A-176CF94DDDD1@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5124A2BF-BD43-434F-9B3A-176CF94DDDD1@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 205.211.164.50 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.x, 3ware 7506-8, twe4, raid5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 02:14:35 -0000 On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:29:46 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote: >I am looking at getting a 3ware 7506-8 for a FreeBSD 5.4 box. I have =20 >looked at the hardware support, finding the twe4 driver. How would =20 >people rate this card under FreeBSD? I am currently using an Adaptec =20 >ATA-100 RAID 2400A which only support 4 drives. > > >I would like to run an 8 drive RAID5 with the 7506-8. > Yes, it works well for me. I use it for one of my offsite backup servers. Its actually a 7810, but works the same. I have had great luck with the 3ware products over the years under FreeBSD and LINUX. ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, Sentex communications http://www.sentex.net Providing Internet Access since 1994 mike@sentex.net, (http://www.tancsa.com) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 02:27:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FBA616A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 02:27:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dvv@online.bg) Received: from gandalf.online.bg (gandalf.online.bg [217.75.128.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 277B143D4C for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 02:27:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dvv@online.bg) Received: (qmail 15846 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2005 02:27:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.3?) (217.75.152.84) by gandalf.online.bg with SMTP; 26 Jul 2005 02:27:09 -0000 Message-ID: <42E59F78.1050105@online.bg> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 05:27:04 +0300 From: "dvv@online.bg" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "dvv@online.bg" References: <42E4AB1A.9040006@online.bg> <42E4BB33.6060009@ccgis.de> <42E53745.5010308@online.bg> In-Reply-To: <42E53745.5010308@online.bg> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Benjamin Thelen , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PANIC on 6.0-BETA-1[SOLVED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 02:27:15 -0000 Hi! I managed to recover and am running 7-CURRENT now. The morale of the story is 1.disable fancy drivers and scripts for binary compatibilites before proceeding 2. Prepare a backup 3. READ UPDATING 4. use unload all when building and after rebooting with the new kernel. Use GENERIC at first, then your kernel. Backup 2-3 good kernels. 5. recompile ports with the new system. 6. Don't diddle with the upgrade process - let it run Have a good one! dvv@online.bg wrote: > Did as advised and reached to full booting system, which complained > that no dump devices were found, even when I had specified one in > rc.conf. > Mergemaster grunts "cannot cd to /usr/src/etc and install files to > temproot", when booting in single mode and trying to update the files. > cap_mkdb quits on "-l" option passed by another program. > I saw > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-February/077661.html > and will fight it these days. > Finally I tried upgrading from cd and got with kernel panic at the > end. I will give the file tomorrow - I'm too exhausted now. > Anyway 6.0 will be superb > Have a good one, > Dimitar > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 02:48:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0875816A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 02:48:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com) Received: from mx21.fujixerox.co.jp (mx21.fujixerox.co.jp [192.26.96.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7783743D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 02:48:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com) Received: from isvw21.fujixerox.co.jp ([129.249.27.141]) by mx21.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6Q2mYBX008712; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:48:34 +0900 (JST) Received: from ms20.fujixerox.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by isvw21.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6Q2mYO4000495; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:48:34 +0900 (JST) Received: from ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (ms1 [129.249.27.192]) by ms20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6Q2mXe5011010; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:48:33 +0900 (JST) Received: from sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com ([13.198.8.73]) by ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (8.11.6p2a/3.7W) with ESMTP id j6Q2mUm27096; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:48:30 +0900 (JST) Received: from mailhost.sgp.fujixerox.com by sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com with ESMTP id 95117661122346097; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:48:17 +0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F8931D93C; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:48:13 +0800 (SGT) Received: from sess.xssc.sgp.xerox.com (unknown [13.198.33.122]) by imss.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E825D1D936; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:48:07 +0800 (SGT) From: Xu Qiang To: Glenn Sieb , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:51:24 +0800 X-Sent-Folder-Path: Sent Items X-Mailer: Oracle Connector for Outlook 9.0.4 60130 (9.0.2711) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20050726024807.E825D1D936@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> Cc: Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com Subject: RE: undelete in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 02:48:37 -0000 Glenn Sieb wrote: > Nelis Lamprecht said the following on 7/21/2005 5:13 AM: >> There isn't a way to restore unless you have a backup. However, most >> of the binary files in /usr/local/bin are from packages/ports you >> have installed on your system. So you may be able to get away with >> using portupgrade(/usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade) to re-install >> those packages and therefore "restoring" some if not all of >> /usr/local/bin. Do a portupgrade -f -a which forces portupgrade to >> re-install all packages/ports you have currently installed. > Nelis, > = > First I think he might have to go re-install portupgrade. > = > Xu--as root, perform the following steps: > = > cd /tmp > tar cvf etc.tar /usr/local/etc/ > cd /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade > make install && make clean > portupgrade -farRx bsdpan- > = > This will force reinstallation of all your ports. This will take > *forever*. = > = > And, just in case, we've tarred up your /usr/local/etc directory so > you have a backup in /tmp! Thanks for all who helped. = I am just wondering the only shortcoming of Unix clone, such as FreeBSD, in= contrast to M$ Windows, is the lack of a cyclin bin, from which you can re= store anything you have mis-deleted before. = Or, am I mis-informed on this issue? Regards, Xu Qiang From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 03:24:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424AD16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:24:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iain_dooley@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay9-f9.bay9.hotmail.com [64.4.46.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9EA43D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:24:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iain_dooley@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:24:30 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 80.15.249.149 by by9fd.bay9.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:24:30 GMT X-Originating-IP: [129.78.228.114] X-Originating-Email: [iain_dooley@hotmail.com] X-Sender: iain_dooley@hotmail.com From: "Iain Dooley" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:24:30 +0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2005 03:24:30.0809 (UTC) FILETIME=[8933DC90:01C59191] Subject: status: no carrier with WEB enabled X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:24:31 -0000 hello, i am running FreeBSD 4.10 using an Orinoco wifi pccard NIC, using a minitar wireless bridge in AP mode. I am able to login to the AP using a web browser to configure it from another machine on my network (wired). When WEP is disabled on the AP, my card can associate fine and I am able to do a DHCP request to my ADSL modem (which has a DHCP server in it... i'm going to switch to using another machine as a gateway and the ADSL modem as a bridge as soon as i get my hands on another PCI NIC, then I will be using static IP addressing for my internal network). I enabled WEP on the AP, and disabled broadcast SSID. I haven't implemented MAC filtering yet. Eventually i will switch to IPSec, but one step at a time :-) with WEP enabled, my roommate is able to access the network via the AP from his OSX box using a D-Link USB wireless NIC, so WEP encryption appears to be functioning properly from the AP's side of things. I followed instructions for wicontrol to turn on WEP, set the ssid and the key as appropriate, set the card to AP mode and set the appropriate channel. after doing this, ifconfig showed 'status: no carrier'. Everything else in ifconfig matched the settings on my AP. i then tried: dhclient wi0 to attempt to do a DHCP request, but this had no effect. I then tried: ifconfig wi0 inet 192.168.1.105 netmask 255.255.255.0 ssid NETWORK_NAME wepmode on wepkey XXXXXXXXXXXXX (<-- 13 digit, 128 bit encryption) where 192.168.1.x is the subnet defined by the ADSL modem, NETWORK_NAME is the same ssid as is set on the AP web configurator, and XXXXXXXXXXXXX is a 13 digit, 128 bit wep encryption key. both the AP and the wi0 interface are using key index 1. ifconfig still shows 'status: no carrier'. my first question is, can anyone see why this might not be working? let me know if i need to supply further information. my second question is, how can i pass the arguments such as 'wepmode on' and 'ssid' to dhclient, in particular what lines should i include in rc.conf so that a DHCP request uses the appropriate key etc. on bootup? thanks very much. iain dooley _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 03:53:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF56016A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:53:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D5143D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:53:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6Q3rZLE015738 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:53:36 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050725204649.100f4a50@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:49:59 -0700 To: Xu Qiang , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <20050726024807.E825D1D936@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> References: <20050726024807.E825D1D936@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: RE: undelete in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:53:37 -0000 At 07:51 PM 7/25/2005, Xu Qiang wrote: >I am just wondering the only shortcoming of Unix clone, such as FreeBSD, >in contrast to M$ Windows, is the lack of a cyclin bin, from which you can >restore anything you have mis-deleted before. > >Or, am I mis-informed on this issue? If you're really worried about accidently deleting files, just make rm an alias to 'rm -i' or 'rm -I' -Glenn >Regards, >Xu Qiang > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 05:26:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D7A816A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 05:26:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from casey@phantombsd.org) Received: from phantombsd.org (dsl231-036-158.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.36.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926F143D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 05:26:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from casey@phantombsd.org) Received: by phantombsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1004) id DD89B102E6E; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:26:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (tomcat.phantombsd.org [192.168.1.6]) by phantombsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE718102C2C; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:26:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42E5C992.5030307@phantombsd.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:26:42 -0700 From: casey User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glenn Dawson References: <20050726024807.E825D1D936@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050725204649.100f4a50@cobalt.antimatter.net> In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20050725204649.100f4a50@cobalt.antimatter.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on eagle.phantombsd.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.4 Cc: Xu Qiang , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: undelete in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 05:26:46 -0000 Glenn Dawson wrote: > At 07:51 PM 7/25/2005, Xu Qiang wrote: > >> I am just wondering the only shortcoming of Unix clone, such as >> FreeBSD, in contrast to M$ Windows, is the lack of a cyclin bin, from >> which you can restore anything you have mis-deleted before. >> >> Or, am I mis-informed on this issue? > > > If you're really worried about accidently deleting files, just make rm > an alias to 'rm -i' or 'rm -I' > > -Glenn > > >> Regards, >> Xu Qiang >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Also check out chflags. Under certain security levels, you can set flags so that something can not be deleted even as root. Casey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 05:39:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8904816A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 05:39:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ross@axe.homelinux.net) Received: from smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07E243D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 05:39:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ross@axe.homelinux.net) Received: from lucy.axe.homelinux.net ([82.36.124.90]) by smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 06:40:36 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.3] (purplehaze [192.168.0.3]) by lucy.axe.homelinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40591479F; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 06:39:48 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <42E5CC98.2060500@axe.homelinux.net> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 06:39:36 +0100 From: Ross Kendall Axe User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glenn Dawson References: <20050726024807.E825D1D936@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050725204649.100f4a50@cobalt.antimatter.net> In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20050725204649.100f4a50@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 OpenPGP: url=http://www.rossaxe.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/.pgpkey Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2005 05:40:36.0717 (UTC) FILETIME=[8C7689D0:01C591A4] Cc: Xu Qiang , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: undelete in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 05:39:53 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Glenn Dawson wrote: > At 07:51 PM 7/25/2005, Xu Qiang wrote: > >> I am just wondering the only shortcoming of Unix clone, such as >> FreeBSD, in contrast to M$ Windows, is the lack of a cyclin bin, from >> which you can restore anything you have mis-deleted before. >> >> Or, am I mis-informed on this issue? Yes. MS-Windows doesn't have anything Unix doesn't in this regard. I take it you're not familiar with the DOS/Windows 'del' command... > If you're really worried about accidently deleting files, just make rm > an alias to 'rm -i' or 'rm -I' If he's worried about accidentally deleting files, he should use KDE or Gnome. They both have a trash can/wastebasket/recycle bin. Ross > -Glenn > > >> Regards, >> Xu Qiang >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC5cyW9bR4xmappRARAn2wAKC3oB1B2bgveSvb1F/1TBW1B4yETQCgkeVm 26L4uYUs/oqfF2YUVdTIyEU= =jYHH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 06:00:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6DE16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 06:00:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from karel@inetis.com) Received: from inetis.com (cpe-212-18-40-64.adsl.amis.net [212.18.40.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77C543D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 06:00:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from karel@inetis.com) Received: from [192.168.0.14] ([192.168.0.14]) by inetis.com with MailEnable ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:59:35 +0200 Message-ID: <42E5D145.4050200@inetis.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:59:33 +0200 From: Karel Miklav User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050726024807.E825D1D936@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> In-Reply-To: <20050726024807.E825D1D936@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: undelete in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 06:00:08 -0000 Xu Qiang wrote: > ... is the lack of a cyclin bin, from which you can restore anything > you have mis-deleted before. > > Or, am I mis-informed on this issue? I scratched my head about it too and finally wrote a simple script which moves trashed items into auto made date-stamped directories. I can send it later, if there's interest. -- Regards, Karel Miklav From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 06:14:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C7F16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 06:14:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from speechpro.com (speech-tech-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.190.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C244343D53 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 06:14:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from sysadm.stc ([192.168.2.26]) by s1.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD)) id 1DxIhT-0005rK-6T for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:13:59 +0400 Message-ID: <42E5D4BA.5090801@speechpro.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:14:18 +0400 From: Igor Robul User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050518) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200507231237.44829.bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net> <42E2DCAC.3060700@grokking.org> In-Reply-To: <42E2DCAC.3060700@grokking.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archived: Yes Subject: Re: [OT Re: SPAM Problem] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 06:14:44 -0000 Greg Maruszeczka wrote: >It's probably "blowback" resulting from the activities of worm-infected >windows hosts. Someone you correspond with got infected and the worm >subsequently propagated itself by picking your name from their address >book and inserting it into the from: header of the message carrying the >worm. Then, badly configured MTAs send "helpful" NDRs to the "sender" >informing them that they're messages couldn't be delivered > >Pretty routine, really. > > In 2005.01 we have got 48605 bounce messages (instead of 4-10, our clients prefer to call phone) to our help desk email and I was _forced_ to close this address with semi-helpful message after "RCPT TO:" command about new address. Now I reopened address and we get "normal" number of spam messages at it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 06:57:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF66B16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 06:57:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corevette@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66CCB43D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 06:57:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corevette@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so1140479wra for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:57:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Bg9D0xYIExqd9n51EobVrckF6TIay0TcEqTCuZ/GbqayuIMCEPP//BaM2LVfKFwTFClvnYN3bMPkQmuEioWMzYPY8ZX1ue+q2CcjVeaN2MIVrR4/M3agu4Hc6GfikXHwdRlLM7uq2YR9G2q305KbiCuGDj1tss3+He80HAX/Mr0= Received: by 10.54.44.7 with SMTP id r7mr29274wrr; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:57:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.118.20 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:57:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3d48d9c80507252357277006c6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:57:28 -0700 From: Corey Farwell To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Need Help Installing FreeBSD with AMD x86 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Corey Farwell List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 06:57:29 -0000 I have all the ISO's burned to a CD, but when I put the boot disk in to=20 install, after I restart, it goes to the normal windows. I've already tried= =20 going to the BIOS settings, but nothing there helped me. What do I do now? Corey Farwell --=20 Get Firefox -=20 http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=3Daffiliates&id=3D57179&t=3D78%22 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 07:03:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7D816A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:03:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry.mityugov@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A373643D4C for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:03:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry.mityugov@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so1100237wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:03:22 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kpojNXCNl45cxEqascxj+GrtGMD+BbKpWtye+XO5TBY3ufMPvS+S7nKfstdhAEpqlbLeKtmscdpmOAUq5yZQ5xAY/gWWBmQ6Pamf/Bu8QHfkws9Ci+7/0FNyI9Yf7Lo+SD9r1Ut87WfvLFOFFRgGEWDmDVynhlO3TfWM0kql3Q4= Received: by 10.54.11.31 with SMTP id 31mr30450wrk; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:03:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.56.33 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:03:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:03:21 +0400 From: Dmitry Mityugov To: Jesus Romero In-Reply-To: <11aa082005072511195ad1e22f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <11aa082005072511195ad1e22f@mail.gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: filesystem creation problem during the installation process. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dmitry Mityugov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:03:23 -0000 On 7/25/05, Jesus Romero wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I have the following issue: >=20 > Once I've chosen in the sysinstall main menu: > 1- Standart Installation > 2- ad0 as selected drive. > 3- I've deleted the current partitions there and created a new one for > Freebsd using "Use Entire Disk". But I have to click S to define this > slice as ACTIVE partition and that's it. Click Q. > 4- I use "Fdisk Partition Using Entire Disk" I click "A" as default > partition. Click Q. > 5- I select Standar like Boot Manager for drive ad0. > 6- For Choose Distribution, I choose ALL. > 7- For Choose Media, I choose CD/DVD. > 8- And after I got the following warning: >=20 > User Confirmation Requested > Last Chance! Are you SURE you want to continue the installation? > If you're running this on a disk with data you wish to save then WE > STRONGLY ENCOURAGE YOU TO MAKE PROPER BACKUPS before proceeding! > We can take no responsibility for lost disk contents! > [ Yes ] No >=20 > 9- I chose, YES, and I've always gotten the following message. >=20 > [ Unable to find device node for /dev/ad0s1b in /dev > Creation of filesystem will be aborted ] >=20 > 10- I've tried a lot alternatives, but without luck!! How big is the drive? What does happen if you create a smaller partition for the OS at the beginning of the drive instead of using the entire drive? --=20 Dmitry Mityugov, St. Petersburg, Russia I ignore all messages with confidentiality statements "We live less by imagination than despite it" - Rockwell Kent, "N by E" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 07:06:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16AC516A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:06:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterpub1@aboutsupport.com) Received: from mail.hostmansion.com (mail.hostmansion.com [69.42.139.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2AC43D53 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:05:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterpub1@aboutsupport.com) Received: from [216.158.144.61] (mail.hostmansion.com [69.42.139.9]) by mail.hostmansion.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC62611C028; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:38:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42E5E0A1.7010600@aboutsupport.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:05:05 +0300 From: Peter User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Karel Miklav References: <20050726024807.E825D1D936@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> <42E5D145.4050200@inetis.com> In-Reply-To: <42E5D145.4050200@inetis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: undelete in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:06:00 -0000 Hi, this tip is taken from BSD hacks book(http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0596006799/002-3776521-4670458?v=glance) Create a Trash Directory Save "deleted" files until you're really ready to send them to the bit bucket. One of the first things Unix users learn is that deleted files are really, really gone. This is especially true at the command line where there isn't any Windows-style recycling bin to rummage through should you have a change of heart regarding the fate of a removed file. It's off to the backups! (You do have backups, don't you?) Fortunately, it is very simple to hack a small script that will send removed files to a custom trash directory. If you've never written a script before, this is an excellent exercise in how easy and useful scripting can be. Since a script is an executable file, you should place your scripts in a directory that is in your path. Remember, your path is just a list of directories where the shell will look for commands if you don't give them full pathnames. To see your path: % echo $PATH PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/ local/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/home/dru/bin In this output, the shell will look for executables in the bin subdirectory of dru's home directory. However, it won't look for executables placed directly in my home directory, or /home/dru. Since bin isn't created by default, I should do that first: % cd % mkdir bin As I create scripts, I'll store them in /home/dru/bin, since I don't have permission to store them anywhere else. Fortunately, no one else has permission to store them in my bin directory, so it's a good match. The scripts themselves contain at least three lines: #!/bin/sh # a comment explaining what the script does the command to be executed The first line indicates the type of script by specifying the program to use to execute the script. I've chosen to use a Bourne script because that shell is available on all Unix systems. Your script should also have comments, which start with the # character. It's surprising how forgetful you can be six months down the road, especially if you create a lot of scripts. For this reason, you should also give the script a name that reminds you of what it does. The third and subsequent lines contain the meat of the script: the actual command(s) to execute. This can range from a simple one-liner to a more complex set of commands, variables, and conditions. Fortunately, we can make a trash script in a simple one-liner. Let's start with this variant, which I found as the result of a Google search: % more ~/bin/trash #!/bin/sh # script to send removed files to trash directory mv $1 ~/.trash/ You should recognize the path to the Bourne shell, the comment, and the mv command. Let's take a look at that $1. This is known as a positional parameter and specifically refers to the first parameter of the trash command. Since the mv commands takes filenames as parameters, the command: mv $1 ~/.trash/ is really saying, mv the first filename, whatever it happens to be, to a directory called .trash in the user's home directory (represented by the shell shortcut of ~). This move operation is our custom "recycle." Before this script can do anything, it must be set as executable: % chmod +x ~/bin/trash And I must create that trash directory for it to use: % mkdir ~/.trash Note that I've chosen to create a hidden trash directory; any file or directory that begins with the . character is hidden from normal listings. This really only reduces clutter, though, as you can see these files by passing the -a switch to ls. If you also include the F switch, directory names will end with a /: % ls -aF ~ .cshrc .history .trash/ bin/ images/ myfile Now comes the neat part of the hack. I want this script to kick in every time I use rm. Since it is the shell that executes commands, I simply need to make my shell use the trash command instead. I do that by adding this line to ~/.cshrc: alias rm trash That line basically says: when I type rm, execute trash instead. It doesn't matter which directory I am in. As long as I stay in my shell, it will mv any files I try to rm to my hidden trash directory. Whenever you create a script, always test it first. I'll start by telling my shell to reread its configuration file: % source ~/.cshrc Then, I'll make some test files to remove: % cd % mkdir test % cd test % touch test1 % rm test1 % ls ~/.trash test1 Looks like the script is working. However, it has a flaw. Have you spotted it yet? If not, try this: % touch a aa aaa aaaa % rm a* % ls ~/.trash test1 a % ls test aa aaa aaaa What happened here? I passed the shell more than one parameter. The a* was expanded to a, aa, aaa, and aaaa before trash could execute. Those four parameters were then passed on to the mv command in my script. However, trash passes only the first parameter to the mv command, ignoring the remaining parameters. Fortunately, they weren't removed, but the script still didn't achieve what I wanted. You can actually have up to nine parameters, named $1 to $9. However, our goal is to catch all parameters, regardless of the amount. To do that, we use $@: mv $@ ~/.trash/ Make that change to your script, then test it by removing multiple files. You should now have a script that works every time. 1.9.5 Taking Out the Trash You should occasionally go through your trash directory and really remove the files you no longer want. If you're really on your toes you may be thinking, "But how do I empty the trash directory?" If you do this: % rm ~/.trash/* your trash directory won't lose any files! This time you really do want to use rm, not trash. To tell your shell to use the real rm command, simply put a \ in front of it like so: % \rm /trash/* Voila, empty recycling bin. One obvious extension is to keep versioned backups. Use the date command to find the time of deletion and append that to the name of the file in the trash command. You could get infinitely more complicated by storing a limited number of versions or deleting all versions older than a week or a month. Of course, you could also keep your important files under version control and leave the complexity to someone else! Karel Miklav wrote: > Xu Qiang wrote: > >>... is the lack of a cyclin bin, from which you can restore anything >>you have mis-deleted before. >> >>Or, am I mis-informed on this issue? > > > I scratched my head about it too and finally wrote a simple script > which moves trashed items into auto made date-stamped directories. I > can send it later, if there's interest. > -- Best regards, Peter http://AboutSupport.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 07:19:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA8816A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:19:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from valerio.daelli@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF6543D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:19:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from valerio.daelli@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so1101665wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:19:42 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=gdZRLR+vH5/FGuwhajTzE+1aNbLyZu4FD5Gdu69jQu9wsgJuj9xHTNW4Si1zMNjzpQZ9bpsiP5AINsRGL7Dzh06x/inre3jRTQsUTkdQ0m0t+jsQvtHQBd2WmVFu3F9+VYwLYHbOydPVLwxaRP6lGe0qq4kmjQsejMmZvGBoqXk= Received: by 10.54.128.7 with SMTP id a7mr34395wrd; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:19:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.160.11 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:19:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <27dbfc8c050726001977c0e503@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:19:42 +0200 From: Valerio daelli To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: PAM debug X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Valerio daelli List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:19:43 -0000 Hello we are having problems with PAM authenticating users on LDAP. We have FreeBSD 5.3. We would like to switch debugging. If we put this line in /etc/pam.d/login auth sufficient pam_ldap.so debug try_first_pass nothing happens. This is our nss_ldap.conf -------------------------------------------------- uri ldap://127.0.0.1/ base dc=3Difom-ieo-campus,dc=3Dit binddn uid=3DMYID,dc=3DMYDOMAIN bindpw MYPASSWD pam_password SSHA scope sub logdir /var/log debug 9 -------------------------------------------------- Thanks a lot Valerio Daelli From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 07:48:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4C816A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:48:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA6E43D4C for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:48:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6Q7mRLq021336 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:48:28 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050726003518.1aa02eb0@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:39:26 -0700 To: Corey Farwell , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <3d48d9c80507252357277006c6@mail.gmail.com> References: <3d48d9c80507252357277006c6@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: Need Help Installing FreeBSD with AMD x86 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:48:30 -0000 At 11:57 PM 7/25/2005, Corey Farwell wrote: >I have all the ISO's burned to a CD, but when I put the boot disk in to >install, after I restart, it goes to the normal windows. More info about your hardware would help. Are you unable to boot from the CD? or are you adding FreeBSD as a second operating system but are unable to boot into FreeBSD after the install completes? What are "the normal windows"? -Glenn > I've already tried >going to the BIOS settings, but nothing there helped me. What do I do now? >Corey Farwell > >-- >Get Firefox - >http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&id=57179&t=78%22 >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 07:56:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D495F16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:56:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gbentley@uk2.net) Received: from webmailsmtp1.uk2net.com (mailout.uk2.net [83.170.69.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7DB43D49 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:56:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gbentley@uk2.net) Received: from [10.0.1.51] (helo=mailnew-1.uk2.net) by webmailsmtp1.uk2net.com with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DxKIh-0002TU-HT for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:56:31 +0100 Received: from 81.174.174.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user gbentley) by maxproxy1.uk2net.com with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:56:31 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <50840.81.174.174.115.1122364591.squirrel@maxproxy1.uk2net.com> In-Reply-To: <20050726020239.195DD16A428@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20050726020239.195DD16A428@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:56:31 +0100 (BST) From: "Graham Bentley" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: Samba without Cups ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:56:33 -0000 I just want file sharing, not printing. pkg_add -r samba3 also pulls in cups then my smb log complains ... [2005/07/26 00:31:17, 0] printing/print_cups.c:cups_cache_reload(85) Unable to connect to CUPS server localhost - Connection refused (I havent enabled cups daemon) but insists ; Global parameter load printers found in service section! even thought I have printers = no in my smb.conf ??? Anyone know how to stop Samba trying to pal up with cups ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 08:03:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97ECD16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:03:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josephlynch@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E579043D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:03:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josephlynch@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i21so82328wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:03:08 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=bgjI4oMQQ1Kdqgu9dgiURgtnNjY0Al1y8u92H4R3JIvF9RTAV8t+AywkAugxQcpV+N7ireaK9o/MeWbG0CWVC4m5NsT8QD0CWlnNqsOVvxf7DDGNWYyPHDfAejIzUtNArMxuzIzMZJXiGgIugws+f00moqtwVNzRfWU53ywOevE= Received: by 10.54.33.36 with SMTP id g36mr42952wrg; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:03:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.123.16 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:03:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:03:08 +0000 From: Joseph Lynch To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Help Me Please!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joseph Lynch List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:03:09 -0000 cd . && /usr/local/bin/bash /usr/ports/textproc/intltool/work/intltool-0.34/missing --run automake-1.9 --gnu /usr/ports/textproc/intltool/work/intltool-0.34/missing: line 52: automake-1.9: command not found WARNING: `automake-1.9' is missing on your system. You should only need it= if you modified `Makefile.am', `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'. You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. cd . && /usr/local/bin/bash /usr/ports/textproc/intltool/work/intltool-0.34/missing --run autoconf /usr/ports/textproc/intltool/work/intltool-0.34/missing: line 52: autoconf: command not found WARNING: `autoconf' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `configure.in'. You might want to install the `Autoconf' and `GNU m4' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. /usr/local/bin/bash ./config.status --recheck running /usr/local/bin/bash ./configure --libdir=3D/usr/local/libdata --prefix=3D/usr/local --build=3Di386-portbld-freebsd4.11 build_alias=3Di386-portbld-freebsd4.11 --no-create --no-recursion Hello, I keep getting this error while install application on freebsd. I have freebsd 4.11 stable I just reformatted and reinstalled it because I kept getting errors on the last install I did. I have cvsup'ed ports nermous times and also I did a portupgrade upgrade.. Could anybody please help me with this problem?? Thankss P.S. I have those packages installed already, I did rehash and make install clean after install. Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 08:11:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1CD16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:11:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from smtp2.versatel.nl (smtp2.versatel.nl [62.58.50.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF09C43D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:11:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 14927 invoked by uid 0); 26 Jul 2005 08:11:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.2.5]) ([62.59.173.176]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp2.versatel.nl (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for < >; 26 Jul 2005 08:11:03 -0000 Message-ID: <42E5F028.3020101@gmx.net> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:11:20 +0200 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050521) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joseph Lynch References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help Me Please!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:11:06 -0000 Joseph Lynch wrote: >cd . && /usr/local/bin/bash >/usr/ports/textproc/intltool/work/intltool-0.34/missing --run >automake-1.9 --gnu >/usr/ports/textproc/intltool/work/intltool-0.34/missing: line 52: >automake-1.9: command not found >WARNING: `automake-1.9' is missing on your system. You should only need it if > you modified `Makefile.am', `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'. > You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. > Grab them from any GNU archive site. >cd . && /usr/local/bin/bash >/usr/ports/textproc/intltool/work/intltool-0.34/missing --run autoconf >/usr/ports/textproc/intltool/work/intltool-0.34/missing: line 52: >autoconf: command not found >WARNING: `autoconf' is missing on your system. You should only need it if > you modified `configure.in'. You might want to install the > `Autoconf' and `GNU m4' packages. Grab them from any GNU > archive site. >/usr/local/bin/bash ./config.status --recheck >running /usr/local/bin/bash ./configure --libdir=/usr/local/libdata >--prefix=/usr/local --build=i386-portbld-freebsd4.11 >build_alias=i386-portbld-freebsd4.11 --no-create --no-recursion > > >Hello, I keep getting this error while install application on freebsd. >I have freebsd 4.11 stable I just reformatted and reinstalled it >because I kept getting errors on the last install I did. I have >cvsup'ed ports nermous times and also I did a portupgrade upgrade.. >Could anybody please help me with this problem?? Thankss > >P.S. > I have those packages installed already, I did rehash and make >install clean after install. Thanks >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > You just want to install intltool ? then why not just 'cd /usr/ports/textproc/intltool/ && make install distclean' ? good luck -- -Frank Staals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 08:16:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DAE016A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:16:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E469543D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:16:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: from reverse-213-146-114-24.cust.kamp-dsl.de [213.146.114.24] (helo=reverse-213-146-114-24.cust.kamp-dsl.de) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKwh2-1DxKbm2I83-0004pR; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:16:14 +0200 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:17:27 +0200 (CEST) From: "P.U.Kruppa" X-X-Sender: root@www.pukruppa.net To: Graham Bentley In-Reply-To: <50840.81.174.174.115.1122364591.squirrel@maxproxy1.uk2net.com> Message-ID: <20050726101455.H6114@www.pukruppa.net> References: <20050726020239.195DD16A428@hub.freebsd.org> <50840.81.174.174.115.1122364591.squirrel@maxproxy1.uk2net.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:2446dbdf8275641f979193ced594c629 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Samba without Cups ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:16:17 -0000 On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Graham Bentley wrote: > I just want file sharing, not printing. > > pkg_add -r samba3 also pulls in cups then my smb log > complains ... > > [2005/07/26 00:31:17, 0] printing/print_cups.c:cups_cache_reload(85) > Unable to connect to CUPS server localhost - Connection refused > > (I havent enabled cups daemon) > > but insists ; > > Global parameter load printers found in service section! > > even thought I have printers = no in my smb.conf ??? > > Anyone know how to stop Samba trying to pal up with cups ? I guess you should rebuild Samba without CUPS printing support. Regards, Uli. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ********************************************* * Peter Ulrich Kruppa - Wuppertal - Germany * ********************************************* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 08:16:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2893616A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:16:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Joerg.Pulz@frm2.tum.de) Received: from mailhost.frm2.tum.de (mailhost.frm2.tum.de [129.187.179.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544C743D4C for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:16:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Joerg.Pulz@frm2.tum.de) Received: from localhost (mailhost.frm2.tum.de [129.187.179.12]) by mailhost.frm2.tum.de (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6Q8Gj8v049490; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:16:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jpulz@frm2.tum.de) Received: from hades.admin.frm2 (hades.admin.frm2 [172.25.1.10]) by mailhost.frm2.tum.de (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6Q8Gexf049482 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:16:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jpulz@frm2.tum.de) Received: from hades.admin.frm2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hades.admin.frm2 (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6Q8GeJW004148; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:16:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jpulz@frm2.tum.de) Received: (from jpulz@localhost) by hades.admin.frm2 (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6Q8Getf004147; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:16:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jpulz) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:16:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Joerg Pulz To: Graham Bentley In-Reply-To: <50840.81.174.174.115.1122364591.squirrel@maxproxy1.uk2net.com> Message-ID: <20050726100052.P72944@hades.admin.frm2> References: <20050726020239.195DD16A428@hub.freebsd.org> <50840.81.174.174.115.1122364591.squirrel@maxproxy1.uk2net.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: at mailhost.frm2.tum.de Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Samba without Cups ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:16:50 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Graham Bentley wrote: > I just want file sharing, not printing. > > pkg_add -r samba3 also pulls in cups then my smb log > complains ... > > [2005/07/26 00:31:17, 0] printing/print_cups.c:cups_cache_reload(85) > Unable to connect to CUPS server localhost - Connection refused > > (I havent enabled cups daemon) > > but insists ; > > Global parameter load printers found in service section! > > even thought I have printers = no in my smb.conf ??? > > Anyone know how to stop Samba trying to pal up with cups ? Hi, tha package build defaults to build with cups printing support. so if you use the package, you will always get cups installed as a dependency. if you want to entirely remove this dependency you have to build this port from source.and you need to run "make config" in the ports directory and should deslect the CUPS option. setting "load printers = no" in smb.conf should prevent samba from acquiring any printers at all and you should not see the error message. As far as i remember, there is NO "printers = no" option for smb.conf. You should run testparm(1) to verify the options used in your smb.conf file. Joerg - -- The beginning is the most important part of the work. -Plato -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC5fFoSPOsGF+KA+MRAsmmAJ4thkbwb7AKjgeXIlds+otzPmCDcgCcCQs1 t5RnGpxL5gRVGHXh2F5gmeE= =G2bT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 08:22:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2437416A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:22:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@mediamill.co.za) Received: from ctb-mesg6.saix.net (ctb-mesg6.saix.net [196.25.240.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CF643D49 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:22:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@mediamill.co.za) Received: from [192.168.1.203] (rndf-146-53-244.telkomadsl.co.za [165.146.53.244]) by ctb-mesg6.saix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7868749A for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:22:02 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <42E5F3B6.3020406@mediamill.co.za> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:26:30 +0200 From: Gavin McDougall User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <42E5005D.1060805@mediamill.co.za> <42E50736.7020603@hacked.com.br> <42E50A3D.2000201@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <42E50A3D.2000201@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: change mediaopt of NIC to full-duplex X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:22:06 -0000 Thanks to all for the helpful replies and pointers, I thought it would have been more complicated than just editing a config file so I was looking in the wrong places. Cheers, Gavin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 08:34:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F4216A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:34:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420CC43D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:34:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [82.41.37.55] ([82.41.37.55]) by smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:35:42 +0100 Message-ID: <42E5F5B0.9030307@dial.pipex.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:34:56 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050530 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050726020239.195DD16A428@hub.freebsd.org> <50840.81.174.174.115.1122364591.squirrel@maxproxy1.uk2net.com> <20050726100052.P72944@hades.admin.frm2> In-Reply-To: <20050726100052.P72944@hades.admin.frm2> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2005 08:35:42.0640 (UTC) FILETIME=[027B2B00:01C591BD] Subject: Re: Samba without Cups ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:34:59 -0000 Joerg Pulz wrote: > tha package build defaults to build with cups printing support. so if > you use the package, you will always get cups installed as a dependency. > if you want to entirely remove this dependency you have to build this > port from source.and you need to run "make config" in the ports > directory and should deslect the CUPS option. A little exploration of the Makefiles shows this to be false. :-( In net/samba you have > .if !defined(WITHOUT_CUPS) > WITH_CUPS= yes > .endif > and > > .if defined(WITH_CUPS) > LIB_DEPENDS+= cups.2:${PORTSDIR}/print/cups-base > CONFIGURE_ENV+= CPPFLAGS=-I${LOCALBASE}/include \ > LDFLAGS=-L${LOCALBASE}/lib > .else > CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --disable-cups > .endif > > and in net/samba3 you have: > > OPTIONS+= CUPS "With CUPS printing support" on \ > and > > .if defined(WITH_CUPS) > LIB_DEPENDS+= cups.2:${PORTSDIR}/print/cups-base > CONFIGURE_ENV+= CPPFLAGS=-I${LOCALBASE}/include \ > LDFLAGS=-L${LOCALBASE}/lib > .else > CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --disable-cups > .endif So for samba, you just need to make with WITHOUT_CUPS=1 and samba 3 with WITH_CUPS=0, either on the make line or through pkgtools.conf (portupgrade). CUPS support is *not* required for samba to support Unix printing unless you need CUPS to support your printer for whatever reason. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 08:56:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAFC816A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:56:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from server.absolute-media.de (server.absolute-media.de [213.239.231.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0B743D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:56:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A801B8BBE4; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:56:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.absolute-media.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01144-02; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:56:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firewall.demig (p5083905E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.131.144.94]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3766892D4; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:56:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ws-ew-3 (ws-ew-3.w2kdemig [192.168.1.72]) by firewall.demig (8.13.4/8.13.1) with SMTP id j6Q8pYRs001461; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:51:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) From: "Norbert Koch" To: "Alex Zbyslaw" , Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:51:35 +0200 Message-ID: <000001c591bf$3a265960$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <42E5F5B0.9030307@dial.pipex.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at absolute-media.de Cc: Subject: RE: Samba without Cups ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:56:43 -0000 > So for samba, you just need to make with WITHOUT_CUPS=1 and samba 3 with > WITH_CUPS=0, either on the make line or through pkgtools.conf > (portupgrade). I think that's not quite correct. For samba 3 you should just 'make'. WITH_CUPS=0 defines the symbol, and that's what is checked for in the Makefile, not the value. Norbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 09:14:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2273F16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:14:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from karel@inetis.com) Received: from inetis.com (cpe-212-18-40-64.adsl.amis.net [212.18.40.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3438443D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:14:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from karel@inetis.com) Received: from [192.168.0.14] ([192.168.0.14]) by inetis.com with MailEnable ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:13:43 +0200 Message-ID: <42E5FEC5.7080305@inetis.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:13:41 +0200 From: Karel Miklav User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050726024807.E825D1D936@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> <42E5D145.4050200@inetis.com> <42E5E0A1.7010600@aboutsupport.com> In-Reply-To: <42E5E0A1.7010600@aboutsupport.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: undelete in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:14:09 -0000 Peter wrote: > this tip is taken from BSD hacks I do not believe this! This girl literally stole my script, traveled back through time to cover the tracks and made an article out of her shameless act :) Anyway, here's the original version of 'the trash': #! /bin/sh # Move files in a trash folder. trash_root=$HOME/.trash trash_stamp=`date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S` trash_dest=$trash_root/$trash_stamp if [ ! -d $trash_root ]; then mkdir -p $trash_root fi if [ -e $trash_dest ]; then echo "Ups, $trash_dest exists!" else mkdir $trash_dest mv $@ $trash_dest/ echo "Files trashed." fi -- Regards, Karel Miklav From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 09:27:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F6A16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:27:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gbentley@uk2.net) Received: from webmailsmtp1.uk2net.com (mailout.uk2.net [83.170.69.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F97043D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:27:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gbentley@uk2.net) Received: from [10.0.1.51] (helo=mailnew-1.uk2.net) by webmailsmtp1.uk2net.com with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DxLix-0007zB-Kw for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:27:43 +0100 Received: from 81.174.174.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user gbentley) by maxproxy1.uk2net.com with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:27:43 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <50079.81.174.174.115.1122370063.squirrel@maxproxy1.uk2net.com> In-Reply-To: <20050726020239.195DD16A428@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20050726020239.195DD16A428@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:27:43 +0100 (BST) From: "Graham Bentley" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: Where to put scripts ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:27:43 -0000 Hi All, I have a short script for Flexbackup ; #!/bin/sh # Backup using Flexbackup /bin/rm -f /data/IT/Backup_Log/data* /usr/local/bin/flexbackup -newtape /usr/local/bin/flexbackup -dir /data /usr/bin/mt -f /dev/sa0 rewind /usr/bin/mt -f /dev/sa0 offline I put this in /usr/bin/ and made exec In crontab I put ; # Flexbackup Nightly Backup Job 0 2 * * 1-5 root /usr/bin/backup If I run the script manually at the prompt it works perfectly and a new log is written to /data/IT/Backup_Log/ - Great ! (From flexbackup.conf $logdir = '/data/IT/Backup_Log'; # directory for log files) If cron runs it, the old log is rm'ed but no new one is written ??? Is it something to do with paths / perms ? Any help ? -= Thanks =- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 09:41:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5132D16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:41:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from server.absolute-media.de (server.absolute-media.de [213.239.231.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D353643D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:41:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E298C016; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:41:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.absolute-media.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03641-10; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:41:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firewall.demig (p5083905E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.131.144.94]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3C68C352; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:41:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ws-ew-3 (ws-ew-3.w2kdemig [192.168.1.72]) by firewall.demig (8.13.4/8.13.1) with SMTP id j6Q9ed5B003960; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:40:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) From: "Norbert Koch" To: "Graham Bentley" , Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:40:38 +0200 Message-ID: <000101c591c6$14846420$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0 In-Reply-To: <50079.81.174.174.115.1122370063.squirrel@maxproxy1.uk2net.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at absolute-media.de Cc: Subject: RE: Where to put scripts ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:41:42 -0000 > I have a short script for Flexbackup ; > > #!/bin/sh > # Backup using Flexbackup > /bin/rm -f /data/IT/Backup_Log/data* > /usr/local/bin/flexbackup -newtape > /usr/local/bin/flexbackup -dir /data > /usr/bin/mt -f /dev/sa0 rewind > /usr/bin/mt -f /dev/sa0 offline > > I put this in /usr/bin/ and made exec > > In crontab I put ; > > # Flexbackup Nightly Backup Job > 0 2 * * 1-5 root /usr/bin/backup > > If I run the script manually at the prompt > it works perfectly and a new log is written > to /data/IT/Backup_Log/ - Great ! > > (From flexbackup.conf > > $logdir = '/data/IT/Backup_Log'; # directory for log files) > > If cron runs it, the old log is rm'ed but no new one is written ??? > > Is it something to do with paths / perms ? Look into crontab(5). There is a section about the environment settings. My idea is that flexbackup calls some program w/o full path. Is flexbackup a shell/perl/* script? Norbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 09:47:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9ABE16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:47:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zickxell@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F0843D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:47:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zickxell@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so73541wri for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 02:47:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:x-mailer:reply-to:x-priority:message-id:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MKf4NyQFg/GxqWL/6e7GU2DJuYrl7cnsV/D5vgc1GwWyDx1D/6JFl5hesUxM9lnjOXlBjrwQpQgGuRL2LLknH/pZ8ZT6nGbSPFgf262w+N+7SnSpbC6SQl+Uo98TWhyNHJ1hdGdgTh6BS/uyiwYjp/rx+EwFV5Fnu8KkV6lQYU4= Received: by 10.54.19.58 with SMTP id 58mr128685wrs; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 02:47:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?80.237.53.27? ([80.237.53.27]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 40sm5359837wrl.2005.07.26.02.47.32; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 02:47:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:26:44 +0600 From: zick-1 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.1.33) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1443095909.20050726152644@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: questions Xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: zick-1 List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:47:52 -0000 Good day. Tell how to adjust the display with the help xorgcfg? And in what file to keep changes? Loading X of system To be made from/etc/X11/xorg.conf. But I cannot keep change in this file when I leave from xorgcfg. Xorgcfg -textmode does adjustments and writes down them in/etc/X11/xorg.conf but these adjustments do not approach. The system is not started in general or with works with too small frequency of the screen. When I start xorgcfg, I choose the display with help VESA 1024*768@84Hz that all it becomes normal. To me to have each time to enter in X with the help xorgcfg and anew to adjust necessary frequency of the screen. How to make that these adjustments were at once after an input in X? -- Best regards, Sergey mailto:zickxell@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 10:06:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC8816A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:06:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cartman_step1@spymac.com) Received: from webmail3.spymac.net (webmail3.spymac.net [195.225.149.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33F943D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:06:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cartman_step1@spymac.com) Received: from webmail3.spymac.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmail3.spymac.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2AF5C003E for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:06:37 -0600 (MDT) Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Origin: 217.133.130.9 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:06:37 -0600 X-Uidl: 1122372397240391562 X-Mailer: AtMail 4.03 Message-Id: <20050726100637.BF2AF5C003E@webmail3.spymac.net> Subject: sshd and pam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: cartman_step1@spymac.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:06:40 -0000 =0D =0D =0D Hello !=0D Just i have a question about ssh and pam .=0D Trying to login on a machine with freebsd 5.4 from a machine in where i run= =0D fedora core 4 , i can't complete the operation . =0D The error is sshd[449] pam authentication error . What does it mean?How i c= an set=0D pam to permit to login to freebsd and control the machine remotely?=0D I'm new to freebsd and i appreciate if anyone can help me to solve the prob= lem . =0D Thanks in advice=0D From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 10:32:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32C916A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:32:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7850843D49 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:32:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [82.41.37.55] ([82.41.37.55]) by smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:33:12 +0100 Message-ID: <42E6113A.6010500@dial.pipex.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:32:26 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050530 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Norbert Koch References: <000001c591bf$3a265960$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> In-Reply-To: <000001c591bf$3a265960$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2005 10:33:12.0100 (UTC) FILETIME=[6C496640:01C591CD] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Samba without Cups ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:32:29 -0000 Norbert Koch wrote: >>So for samba, you just need to make with WITHOUT_CUPS=1 and samba 3 with >>WITH_CUPS=0, either on the make line or through pkgtools.conf >>(portupgrade). >> >> > >I think that's not quite correct. >For samba 3 you should just 'make'. >WITH_CUPS=0 defines the symbol, and that's what >is checked for in the Makefile, not the value. > > You're quite right, WITH_CUPS=0 is wrong! Shouldn't type in such a hurry :-) In fact, WITHOUT_CUPS=1 should work for both samba and samba3. WITH_CUPS is just set based on WITHOUT_CUPS. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 11:00:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5806A16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:00:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18DB43D49 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:00:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [82.41.37.55] ([82.41.37.55]) by smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:01:35 +0100 Message-ID: <42E617E1.6000407@dial.pipex.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:00:49 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050530 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Graham Bentley References: <000101c591c6$14846420$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> In-Reply-To: <000101c591c6$14846420$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2005 11:01:35.0499 (UTC) FILETIME=[639775B0:01C591D1] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Where to put scripts ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:00:52 -0000 Norbert Koch wrote: >>I have a short script for Flexbackup ; >> >>#!/bin/sh >># Backup using Flexbackup >>/bin/rm -f /data/IT/Backup_Log/data* >>/usr/local/bin/flexbackup -newtape >>/usr/local/bin/flexbackup -dir /data >>/usr/bin/mt -f /dev/sa0 rewind >>/usr/bin/mt -f /dev/sa0 offline >> >>I put this in /usr/bin/ and made exec >> >>In crontab I put ; >> >># Flexbackup Nightly Backup Job >>0 2 * * 1-5 root /usr/bin/backup >> >>If I run the script manually at the prompt >>it works perfectly and a new log is written >>to /data/IT/Backup_Log/ - Great ! >> >>(From flexbackup.conf >> >>$logdir = '/data/IT/Backup_Log'; # directory for log files) >> >>If cron runs it, the old log is rm'ed but no new one is written ??? >> >>Is it something to do with paths / perms ? >> >> > >Look into crontab(5). There is a section about the environment settings. >My idea is that flexbackup calls some program w/o full path. >Is flexbackup a shell/perl/* script? > > I would also ask, why are you putting it in /usr/bin? Given that your script calls things in /usr/local/bin already, there is no advantage I can see to polluting /usr/bin. To test Norbert's hypothesis, take everything except standard directories out of your path and then try running your script. Does the user owning the cronjob receive any mail with suggestive errors? --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 11:10:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C813016A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:10:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sysjo@hades.yoafrica.com) Received: from cortizone.yoafrica.com (cortizone.yoafrica.com [196.44.176.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781DE43D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:10:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sysjo@hades.yoafrica.com) Received: from hades.yoafrica.com ([196.44.177.50] ident=postfix) by cortizone.yoafrica.com with esmtp (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1DxNJy-0009Sb-Sr for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:10:03 +0000 Received: by hades.yoafrica.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F017061AE; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:10:01 +0200 (CAT) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:10:01 +0200 From: John Oxley To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050726111001.GB30218@yoafrica.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="qcHopEYAB45HaUaB" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Subject: ETINC BW Manager. Watchdog failover not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:10:11 -0000 --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have installed the ETINC BW Shaper software v3.24c and things aren't working. The problem I am having is if I try and run watchdogd, I get this: root@pluto:/sys/conf# watchdogd failover -i 7 -d IOCTL: Invalid argument Checking every 2 seconds enabling WDT IOCTL: Invalid argument enable_wdt:: Invalid argument Below is a detailed explanation of what I have done. I am using the ETINC BW Manager on a FreeBSD 4.11 system. Here is my uname -a FreeBSD pluto 4.11-RELEASE-p11 FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p11 #15: Tue Jul 26 11:= 25:09 CAT 2005 sysjo@pluto:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/Pluto i386 The machine is a: CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz (2093.22-MHz 686-class CPU) with SCSI hard drives, an onboard fxp and onboard em NICs, and I have bought a=20 http://www.etinc.com/product_info.php?products_id=3D32 for the actual shaping. The BW software I am using is v3.24c. I have followed the install docs, not quite to the letter, because I had to modify the /sys/conf/files from what they said to get the kernel to compile. These are my modifications: #net/if_ethersubr.c optional ether net/if_etherbwmgr.c optional ether net/if_etherbwmgr.c optional bw I am not meant to put the last line there, but if I don't the kernel compile complains that it can't find the bw device. I have built the kernel (with my modifications) and the module etbwmgr loads successfully: Jul 26 12:50:33 pluto /kernel: ET/BWMGR Driver v3.24c If I try and load the et_bypass module (which I think is for the gigabit failover card), i get (link_elf: symbol em_read_ctlext undefined). I have put=20 options HW_WDOG into my kernel. If anyone can give me some pointers as to what to do, please let me know. Regards, -John --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIIIkgYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIIIgzCCCH8CAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMAsGCSqGSIb3DQEHAaCC BhYwggLPMIICOKADAgECAgMO0a0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAj BgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQ ZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA1MDUzMTA2NTEzMloXDTA2MDUzMTA2 NTEzMlowQzEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEgMB4GCSqGSIb3DQEJ ARYRam9obkB5b2FmcmljYS5jb20wggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDa ZqyI7h6jGtwHQhbqtJlwQy9isJivpp+Cju1sorwJG0FE7Irqoc4impUG6aBGVFjunlMwA76A d6NInU9+KIwr1SRJO4d6qZQhUq810QMpj3vrn7TOtPbnrqKiK1tU//86WVuJHGVc3/4pYpmP jSSilAV8Gj+12YJlKP2ClbnkUF0PwDvEVlJxRjIqrW6Crl5SeCqyJ+JxFK7WQVQ6+nusuO37 0qj0FytU2IE8kxqveKstObVUwd0lQhNTS29e2ytvcNgXk2TrqlBhLpxV9xh/l52jYlRXk8aP HYxnWU/iJmXCgLl9NADpwaV3xajGyFMNSK1Plsm/r4GthtA5vdPXAgMBAAGjLjAsMBwGA1Ud EQQVMBOBEWpvaG5AeW9hZnJpY2EuY29tMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAD gYEAV+aYxxGXhdvzxI4uT4EAKvxdqGzZ1ZVAjoszmpNp2nLTMZ+juzSoqT+SiwoaLQia/T+m BIInP+JnRelE5up8zd1JXHxCjB8StssZNusEE8Hz2c/hZyAIyEdmRRY/mwlHntBu7nkNnmuq LuSeBR8g+ChtyOHZ+IyUnYDlWtUrLM4wggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUA MIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBl IFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0 aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1h aWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcN MDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcNMTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMc VGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFs IEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVz VftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnw K4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/EfkTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gE f6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8E PDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFp bENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8EBAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVM YWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSd f0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQcUCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2p nDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bGCE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYICRDCC AkACAQEwaTBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0 eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EC Aw7RrTAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoIGxMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcN AQkFMQ8XDTA1MDcyNjExMTAwMVowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFOSmKDFzFfqOpBaJ34WjlPjM qzB5MFIGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFFMEMwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqG SIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBAMW/ CiFN+pMY3oTYWanUBlb3FeBcSPa9j6FlAI+JSY/FpRa+dgGLA2T2lcW2a2euhddYv6FrSCIB oA840Ntera7gTZCgecQxvIpABa12y1+UPbd8KvHht3x4XVBeItTsv007A7uEoI44XEJwaSA6 o6VjFRaFZKTuG+GuNmNEQU28LPl72dYTxnaG4AjNfTNKnazgWMFgwjhmlWlWJYU42EQ98KVg rHjUe/S88vAb5clrcMSDhQgQhIxVYev3Ea/KEyywfvWUZvbhGFDBOUd6T5wplM8tvHcS9YeJ G5bkv2uLAta0pejiT87He6udwsl2DcC6p77BmH1UIqgFT0u2XSE= --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 11:33:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D276216A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:33:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon@comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua) Received: from comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua (comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua [195.245.194.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C8A43D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:33:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon@comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua) Received: from pm514-9.comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua (pm514-9.comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua [10.18.54.109]) (authenticated bits=0) by comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6QBeW0R052857 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:40:33 +0300 (EEST) Received: by pm514-9.comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2EACD108; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:31:39 +0300 (EEST) From: Andrey Simonenko To: Valerio daelli In-Reply-To: <1122373423.00339461.1122362401@10.7.7.3> X-Newsgroups: lucky.freebsd.questions Message-Id: <20050726113139.2EACD108@pm514-9.comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:31:39 +0300 (EEST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.82/989/Sat Jul 23 00:27:30 2005 on comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PAM debug X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:33:49 -0000 On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:19:42 +0200 in lucky.freebsd.questions, Valerio daelli wrote: > Hello > we are having problems with PAM authenticating users on LDAP. > We have FreeBSD 5.3. > We would like to switch debugging. > If we put this line in /etc/pam.d/login > > auth sufficient pam_ldap.so debug try_first_pass > > nothing happens. According to pam_ldap/nss manual page debug does not work with pam_ldap/nss. When I debugged my pam_ldap/nss installation I used log file from OpenLDAP server and tcpdump. For the first time my connections were not TLS encrypted, so it was easy to read content of packets. In my environment I don't use bindpw and OpenLDAP sever does not send passwords in any form to clients. Instead everyone is able to read all fields from user dn, except his/her password, when a user tries to login pam_ldap sends password over TLS encrypted channel to OpenLDAP server. Does commands like "id bill" works on a system with ldap_nss? Have you tried to use ldapsearch to query your LDAP server from a client machine? Create syslog-log file for LDAP server (slapd in case of OpenLDAP) and check it. By the way how are you going to share user home directories? One way is to use NFS with quota on a server (on several servers). I'm not very happy with this solution, because NFS will export all fs to clients, if somebody break root, then he/she can gain access to any user home directory. There is pam_mount, with some modifications it can be build on FreeBSD 5.x. Has somebody tried it with Samba? What are alternatives for NFS + quota for systems which use pam_ldap? ps: sorry, for possible double posting. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 12:19:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E2716A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:19:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alainfabry@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay101-f35.bay101.hotmail.com [64.4.56.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5D743D4C for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:19:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alainfabry@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 05:19:58 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 64.4.56.200 by by101fd.bay101.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:19:57 GMT X-Originating-IP: [64.4.56.200] X-Originating-Email: [alainfabry@hotmail.com] X-Sender: alainfabry@hotmail.com From: "Alain Fabry" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:19:57 -0500 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2005 12:19:58.0115 (UTC) FILETIME=[5691B730:01C591DC] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: failed installation of phpBB X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:19:59 -0000 Hello, I'm trying to install phpBB on my system but I get the following error during installation (running Release 5.4). Which package is conflicting and causing this installation to fail? I have the following pkg installed which are related to php. ducati-748# pkg_info | grep php mod_php5-5.0.3_2,1 PHP Apache Module php5-gettext-5.0.3_2 The gettext shared extension for php php5-pcre-5.0.3_2 The pcre shared extension for php php5-session-5.0.3_2 The session shared extension for php ducati-748# Below is installation failure I get after make install clean ducati-748# make install clean ===> Installing for phpbb-2.0.17 ===> phpbb-2.0.17 depends on file: /usr/local/share/pear/System.php - not found ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/share/pear/System.php in /usr/ports/devel/pear-PEAR ===> pear-PEAR-1.3.5_1 depends on file: /usr/local/share/pear/Archive/Tar.php - not found ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/share/pear/Archive/Tar.php in /usr/ports/archivers/pear-Archive_Tar ===> Installing for pear-Archive_Tar-1.3.1 ===> pear-Archive_Tar-1.3.1 depends on executable: pear - not found ===> Verifying install for pear in /usr/ports/devel/php5-pear This port requires the CLI or the CGI version of PHP, but you have already installed a conflicting PHP port without them. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/php5-pear. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/archivers/pear-Archive_Tar. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/pear-PEAR. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/phpbb. ducati-748# Alain Fabry Network Engineer Belgacom http://[1]www.belgacom.be References 1. http://www.belgacom.be/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 18:33:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AAEB16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:33:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: from excite.com (nn6.excitenetwork.com [207.159.120.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C5A43D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:33:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: by xprdmailfe1.nwk.excite.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 4E855109F58; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:33:12 -0400 (EDT) To: glenn@antimatter.net, piotrekk@excite.com, keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Received: from [84.73.114.198] by xprdmailfe1.nwk.excite.com via HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:33:12 EST X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: ID = 2383e4973664c80f7198bf469d15c13b From: "PK" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: piotrekk@excite.com X-Mailer: PHP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050725183312.4E855109F58@xprdmailfe1.nwk.excite.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:33:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:38:46 +0000 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cannot install ntop under freeBSD 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: piotrekk@excite.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:33:14 -0000 hi I did what you suggested. I've deinstalled rrdtool completely, tried install ntop but now I get following horrible errors: xmldumpPlugin.c:36:2: warning: #warning xmldumpPlugin.c:37:2: warning: #warning =========================================================== xmldumpPlugin.c:38:2: warning: #warning xmldumpPlugin.c:39:2: warning: #warning The include of gdome.h that follows will generate a lot of xmldumpPlugin.c:40:2: warning: #warning compile warnings about 'shadows a global declaration'. xmldumpPlugin.c:41:2: warning: #warning Unfortunately, it's the way this crud is coded and can't xmldumpPlugin.c:42:2: warning: #warning be fixed. Just ignore them! xmldumpPlugin.c:43:2: warning: #warning In file included from /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib.h:69, from /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:27, from xmldumpPlugin.c:44: /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/gthreadpool.h:88: warning: declaration of 'wait' shadows a global declaration /usr/include/sys/wait.h:103: warning: shadowed declaration is here In file included from xmldumpPlugin.c:44: /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:264: warning: declaration of 'index' shadows a global declaration /usr/include/strings.h:50: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:331: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:483: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:585: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:649: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:694: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:739: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:783: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:801: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:857: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:893: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:935: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:977: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:1013: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:1033: warning: declaration of 'index' shadows a global declaration /usr/include/strings.h:50: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:1044: warning: declaration of 'index' shadows a global declaration /usr/include/strings.h:50: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:1073: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:1112: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here xmldumpPlugin.c:45:2: warning: #warning xmldumpPlugin.c:46:2: warning: #warning =========================================================== xmldumpPlugin.c:47:2: warning: #warning In file included from xmldumpPlugin.c:1165: xml_s_ntopinterface.inc: In function `newxml_ntopinterface': xml_s_ntopinterface.inc:494: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' xml_s_ntopinterface.inc:529: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' xml_s_ntopinterface.inc:565: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' In file included from xmldumpPlugin.c:1429: xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc: In function `newxml_simpleprototrafficinfo': xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:46: error: structure has no member named `lastLocal' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:46: error: structure has no member named `lastLocal' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:52: error: structure has no member named `lastLocal2remote' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:52: error: structure has no member named `lastLocal2remote' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:58: error: structure has no member named `lastRem' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:58: error: structure has no member named `lastRem' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:64: error: structure has no member named `lastRem2local' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:64: error: structure has no member named `lastRem2local' In file included from xmldumpPlugin.c:1693: xml_g_invoke.inc: In function `dumpXML_invoke': xml_g_invoke.inc:71: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' xml_g_invoke.inc:79: error: structure has no member named `accessLogFile' xml_g_invoke.inc:85: error: structure has no member named `enablePacketDecoding' xml_g_invoke.inc:91: error: structure has no member named `stickyHosts' xml_g_invoke.inc:97: error: structure has no member named `daemonMode' xml_g_invoke.inc:103: error: structure has no member named `maxNumLines' xml_g_invoke.inc:110: error: structure has no member named `rFileName' xml_g_invoke.inc:116: error: structure has no member named `trackOnlyLocalHosts' xml_g_invoke.inc:122: error: structure has no member named `devices' xml_g_invoke.inc:128: error: structure has no member named `enableOtherPacketDump' xml_g_invoke.inc:134: error: structure has no member named `filterExpressionInExtraFrame' xml_g_invoke.inc:140: error: structure has no member named `pcapLog' xml_g_invoke.inc:146: error: structure has no member named `localAddresses' xml_g_invoke.inc:152: error: structure has no member named `numericFlag' xml_g_invoke.inc:158: error: structure has no member named `dontTrustMACaddr' xml_g_invoke.inc:164: error: structure has no member named `protoSpecs' xml_g_invoke.inc:170: error: structure has no member named `enableSuspiciousPacketDump' xml_g_invoke.inc:176: error: structure has no member named `refreshRate' xml_g_invoke.inc:183: error: structure has no member named `disablePromiscuousMode' xml_g_invoke.inc:189: error: structure has no member named `traceLevel' xml_g_invoke.inc:196: error: structure has no member named `maxNumHashEntries' xml_g_invoke.inc:203: error: structure has no member named `maxNumSessions' xml_g_invoke.inc:217: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' xml_g_invoke.inc:227: error: structure has no member named `defaultVsan' xml_g_invoke.inc:234: error: structure has no member named `webAddr' xml_g_invoke.inc:240: error: structure has no member named `webPort' xml_g_invoke.inc:247: error: structure has no member named `enableSessionHandling' xml_g_invoke.inc:253: error: structure has no member named `currentFilterExpression' xml_g_invoke.inc:259: error: structure has no member named `domainName' xml_g_invoke.inc:265: error: structure has no member named `flowSpecs' xml_g_invoke.inc:273: error: structure has no member named `debugMode' xml_g_invoke.inc:279: error: structure has no member named `useSyslog' xml_g_invoke.inc:288: error: structure has no member named `mergeInterfaces' xml_g_invoke.inc:294: error: structure has no member named `pcapLogBasePath' xml_g_invoke.inc:300: error: structure has no member named `fcNSCacheFile' xml_g_invoke.inc:318: error: structure has no member named `printFcOnly' xml_g_invoke.inc:324: error: structure has no member named `mapperURL' xml_g_invoke.inc:332: error: structure has no member named `sslAddr' xml_g_invoke.inc:338: error: structure has no member named `sslPort' xml_g_invoke.inc:349: error: structure has no member named `useSSLwatchdog' xml_g_invoke.inc:359: error: structure has no member named `disableSchedYield' xml_g_invoke.inc:367: error: structure has no member named `P3Pcp' xml_g_invoke.inc:373: error: structure has no member named `P3Puri' xml_g_invoke.inc:379: error: structure has no member named `disableStopcap' xml_g_invoke.inc:385: error: structure has no member named `disableInstantSessionPurge' xml_g_invoke.inc:391: error: structure has no member named `noFc' xml_g_invoke.inc:397: error: structure has no member named `noInvalidLunDisplay' xml_g_invoke.inc:403: error: structure has no member named `disableMutexExtraInfo' xml_g_invoke.inc:409: error: structure has no member named `skipVersionCheck' In file included from xmldumpPlugin.c:1730: xml_g_intf.inc: In function `dumpXML_interfaces': xml_g_intf.inc:33: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' gmake[3]: *** [xmldumpPlugin.lo] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/net/ntop. It must be a BUG in the ntop port. greetings piotr --- On Mon 07/25, Glenn Dawson < glenn@antimatter.net > wrote: From: Glenn Dawson [mailto: glenn@antimatter.net] To: piotrekk@excite.com, keramida@ceid.upatras.gr, piotrekk@excite.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 05:54:26 -0700 Subject: Re: cannot install ntop under freeBSD 5.5 At 05:03 AM 7/25/2005, PK wrote:

>hi
>
>It must be a BUG in the freeBSD 5.4 ntop port !
>
>greetings
>Piotr

The problem you are seeing is because the rrd plugin that's part of ntop is
supplying 5 argument to the rrd_graph() function. Which is ok for the
versions of rrd that are bundled with ntop.

However, if you have the rrdtools port installed, it's version of
rrd_graph() is expecting 8 arguments. The error you are getting is because
the prototype for rrd_graph() that comes with rrdtools does not match how
ntop is calling it.

To get around the problem, you can remove the rrdtool port, and then ntop
should build without errors. If you're using rrdtool you can probably
reinstall it once ntop is built. That may cause a problem if rrdtool
installs any shared libraries that ntop uses.

-Glenn





> --- On Mon 07/25, Giorgos Keramidas < keramida@ceid.upatras.gr > wrote:
>From: Giorgos Keramidas [mailto: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr]
>To: piotrekk@excite.com
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:20:05 +0300
>Subject: Re: cannot install ntop under freeBSD 5.5
>
>On 2005-07-24 20:14, PK wrote:
>
>
>hi
>
> I have exact the same problem and get the same
>errors.
>
> to clean a port, reinstall or upgrade ntop or rrdtool
>doesn't help.

Strange. I did build ntop on 6.0-CURRENT a few days
>before the switch
to 7.0-CURRENT was made. I haven't tried to build
>ntop on 5.X though,
so this may be the problem.


>
>_______________________________________________
>Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
>The most personalized portal on the Web!
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

_______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 05:46:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFECF16A420 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 05:46:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com) Received: from mx20.fujixerox.co.jp (mx20.fujixerox.co.jp [192.26.96.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067FB43D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 05:45:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com) Received: from isvw20.fujixerox.co.jp ([129.249.27.140]) by mx20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6Q5jlDG018561; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:45:47 +0900 (JST) Received: from ms20.fujixerox.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by isvw20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6Q5jlpG013762; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:45:47 +0900 (JST) Received: from ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (ms1 [129.249.27.192]) by ms20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6Q5jl3s026751; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:45:47 +0900 (JST) Received: from sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com ([13.198.8.73]) by ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (8.11.6p2a/3.7W) with ESMTP id j6Q5jjm21268; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:45:45 +0900 (JST) Received: from mailhost.sgp.fujixerox.com by sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com with ESMTP id 95443491122356720; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:45:20 +0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CFAB81D969; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:45:14 +0800 (SGT) Received: from sess.xssc.sgp.xerox.com (unknown [13.198.33.122]) by imss.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827491D93C; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:45:10 +0800 (SGT) From: Xu Qiang To: Ross Kendall Axe , Glenn Dawson Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:48:26 +0800 X-Sent-Folder-Path: Sent Items X-Mailer: Oracle Connector for Outlook 9.0.4 60130 (9.0.2711) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20050726054510.827491D93C@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:38:46 +0000 Cc: Xu Qiang , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: undelete in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 05:46:00 -0000 Ross Kendall Axe wrote: > Yes. MS-Windows doesn't have anything Unix doesn't in this regard. I > take it you're not familiar with the DOS/Windows 'del' command... Hehe, this is a good analog I didn't think of. :) > If he's worried about accidentally deleting files, he should use KDE > or Gnome. They both have a trash can/wastebasket/recycle bin. Now I just have X Window in my machine. Not as good-looking as Gnome deskto= p. Can I install gnome without using ports? I want to install everything manua= lly. = thanks, = Regards, Xu Qiang From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 07:48:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCF216A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:48:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF4F43D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:48:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6Q7mRl9021334 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:48:28 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050726002209.1aa02a40@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: glenn@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:25:08 -0700 To: Xu Qiang , Ross Kendall Axe From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <20050726054510.827491D93C@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> References: <20050726054510.827491D93C@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:38:46 +0000 Cc: Xu Qiang , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: undelete in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:48:33 -0000 At 10:48 PM 7/25/2005, Xu Qiang wrote: >Ross Kendall Axe wrote: > > Yes. MS-Windows doesn't have anything Unix doesn't in this regard. I > > take it you're not familiar with the DOS/Windows 'del' command... > >Hehe, this is a good analog I didn't think of. :) > > > If he's worried about accidentally deleting files, he should use KDE > > or Gnome. They both have a trash can/wastebasket/recycle bin. > >Now I just have X Window in my machine. Not as good-looking as Gnome desktop. >Can I install gnome without using ports? I want to install everything >manually. Are you a glutton for punishment? You can install it manually, I did it once...never again. Seriously though, there are so many dependencies that it takes forever to get everything set up manually. With ports you just do a make install clean and come back in a few hours (or days depending on how fast your machine is) -Glenn >thanks, > >Regards, >Xu Qiang --- We've checked and double checked, it keeps coming up the same thing. The message is "Mars needs women". From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 12:46:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC47916A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:46:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-html@jonathan-glaschke.de) Received: from mail.liberty-hosting.de (mail.liberty-hosting.de [195.225.132.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ABF343D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:46:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-html@jonathan-glaschke.de) Received: from mail.liberty-hosting.de ([195.225.132.203]) by localhost (liberty-mail [195.225.132.203]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44464-02 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:46:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jogla.fbsd (p50894C2B.dip.t-dialin.net [80.137.76.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.liberty-hosting.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57788158AB1 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:46:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jogla.fbsd (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jogla.fbsd (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6QEkUtG001291 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:46:30 GMT (envelope-from jonathan@jogla.fbsd) Received: (from jonathan@localhost) by jogla.fbsd (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6QEkTnB001290 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:46:29 GMT (envelope-from jonathan) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:46:29 +0000 From: Jonathan Glaschke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050726144629.GA1064@jogla.fbsd> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.liberty-hosting.de Subject: Re: failed installation of phpBB X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:46:48 -0000 On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 07:19:57AM -0500, Alain Fabry wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm trying to install phpBB on my system but I get the following error > during installation (running Release 5.4). Which package is > conflicting and causing this installation to fail? > > I have the following pkg installed which are related to php. > > ducati-748# pkg_info | grep php > mod_php5-5.0.3_2,1 PHP Apache Module > php5-gettext-5.0.3_2 The gettext shared extension for php > php5-pcre-5.0.3_2 The pcre shared extension for php > php5-session-5.0.3_2 The session shared extension for php > ducati-748# > > Below is installation failure I get after make install clean > > ducati-748# make install clean > ===> Installing for phpbb-2.0.17 > ===> phpbb-2.0.17 depends on file: /usr/local/share/pear/System.php > - not found > ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/share/pear/System.php in > /usr/ports/devel/pear-PEAR > ===> pear-PEAR-1.3.5_1 depends on file: > /usr/local/share/pear/Archive/Tar.php - not found > ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/share/pear/Archive/Tar.php in > /usr/ports/archivers/pear-Archive_Tar > ===> Installing for pear-Archive_Tar-1.3.1 > ===> pear-Archive_Tar-1.3.1 depends on executable: pear - not found > ===> Verifying install for pear in /usr/ports/devel/php5-pear > This port requires the CLI or the CGI version of PHP, but you have > already installed a conflicting PHP port without them. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/php5-pear. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/archivers/pear-Archive_Tar. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/pear-PEAR. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/www/phpbb. > ducati-748# > > > Alain Fabry > Network Engineer > Belgacom > http://[1]www.belgacom.be > > References > > 1. http://www.belgacom.be/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hello, install php5-cgi and configure apache for treating .php-files as cgi. -Jonathan -- | /"\ ASCII Ribbon | Jonathan Glaschke - Lorenz-Görtz-Straße 71, | \ / Campaign Against | 41238 Mönchengladbach, Tel: 02166-265876 | X HTML In Mail | Mobil: 0162-3390789, ICQ: 231021883 | / \ And News | http://jonathan-glaschke.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 13:00:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27FC16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:00:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from WD@US-Webmasters.com) Received: from usw2.natel.net (2b.bz [209.152.117.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5783F43D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:00:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from WD@US-Webmasters.com) Received: (qmail 56849 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2005 13:00:44 -0000 Received: from batv-01-000.dialup.netins.net (HELO Htebazile.US-Webmasters.com) (216.248.109.1) by us-webmasters.com with SMTP; 26 Jul 2005 13:00:44 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20050726074201.05224b50@209.152.117.178> X-Sender: wd@209.152.117.178 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:00:02 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org From: "W. D." In-Reply-To: <3d48d9c80507252357277006c6@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Corey Farwell Subject: Re: Need Help Installing FreeBSD with AMD x86 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:00:48 -0000 At 01:57 7/26/2005, Corey Farwell, wrote: >I have all the ISO's burned to a CD, but when I put the boot disk in to=20 >install, after I restart, it goes to the normal windows. I've already tried= =20 >going to the BIOS settings, but nothing there helped me. What do I do now? >Corey Farwell Hey Corey, In Windows, how many files are on the CD? Do you see a short list (# 1) or a long list (# 2)? 1. Short List: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Volume in drive N is FBSD5 Dsk Volume Serial Number is 2966-09C7 Directory of N:\ 54-REL~6 ISO 563,701,760 05-27-05 5:16p 5.4-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso CHECKS~8 TXT 207 05-27-05 4:46p CHECKSUM.MD5.txt 2 file(s) 563,701,967 bytes 0 dir(s) 0 bytes free =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 2. Long List: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Volume in drive N is fbsd_miniin Volume Serial Number is 0537-007E Directory of N:\ 5~6 3-R 0 11-05-04 4:59a 5.3-RELEASE ERRATA HTM 4,831 11-05-04 4:41a ERRATA.HTM ERRATA TXT 3,651 11-05-04 4:41a ERRATA.TXT HARDWARE HTM 115,673 11-05-04 4:41a HARDWARE.HTM HARDWARE TXT 68,633 11-05-04 4:41a HARDWARE.TXT INSTALL HTM 73,043 11-05-04 4:41a INSTALL.HTM INSTALL TXT 54,724 11-05-04 4:41a INSTALL.TXT MIGRATE5 HTM 45,289 11-05-04 4:41a MIGRATE5.HTM MIGRATE5 TXT 30,571 11-05-04 4:41a MIGRATE5.TXT README HTM 20,395 11-05-04 4:41a README.HTM README TXT 14,921 11-05-04 4:41a README.TXT RELNOTES HTM 133,496 11-05-04 4:41a RELNOTES.HTM RELNOTES TXT 64,363 11-05-04 4:41a RELNOTES.TXT BASE 11-05-04 4:34a base BOOT 11-05-04 4:41a boot BOOT~36 CAT 2,048 11-05-04 5:00a boot.catalog CATPAGES 11-05-04 4:34a catpages CDROM INF 25 11-05-04 4:34a cdrom.inf COMPAT1X 11-05-04 4:34a compat1x COMPAT20 11-05-04 4:34a compat20 COMPAT21 11-05-04 4:34a compat21 COMPAT22 11-05-04 4:34a compat22 COMPAT3X 11-05-04 4:34a compat3x COMPAT4X 11-05-04 4:34a compat4x DICT 11-05-04 4:34a dict DOC 11-05-04 4:34a doc DOCBOOK CSS 2,971 11-05-04 4:41a docbook.css FLOPPIES 11-05-04 4:34a floppies GAMES 11-05-04 4:34a games INFO 11-05-04 4:34a info MANPAGES 11-05-04 4:34a manpages PACKAGES 10-29-04 7:30a packages PORTS 11-05-04 4:34a ports PROFLIBS 11-05-04 4:34a proflibs SRC 11-05-04 4:34a src TOOLS 07-13-03 7:36a tools 16 file(s) 634,634 bytes 20 dir(s) 0 bytes free =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D If you see a short list, instead of the long list then you still have the OS in "image" format. Use Nero or some other "ISO" burning software to get the actual CD. Once you have the CD as it is meant to be used, this might help: http://www.US-Webmasters.com/FreeBSD/Install/ If you already see the long list, then you have burned the ISO file correctly. You need set the BIOS to boot from the CD. You might have dig around in there or Google for better instructions. Good luck! Start Here to Find It Fast!=99 ->= http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names -> http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 13:21:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B13016A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:21:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E256243D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:21:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6QDpR2T000676 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 06:51:28 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050726050135.1551ed40@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 05:53:32 -0700 To: John Oxley , questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <20050726111001.GB30218@yoafrica.com> References: <20050726111001.GB30218@yoafrica.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: ETINC BW Manager. Watchdog failover not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:21:29 -0000 At 04:10 AM 7/26/2005, John Oxley wrote: >I have installed the ETINC BW Shaper software v3.24c and things aren't >working. The problem I am having is if I try and run watchdogd, I get >this: > >root@pluto:/sys/conf# watchdogd failover -i 7 -d >IOCTL: Invalid argument >Checking every 2 seconds >enabling WDT >IOCTL: Invalid argument >enable_wdt:: Invalid argument > >Below is a detailed explanation of what I have done. > >I am using the ETINC BW Manager on a FreeBSD 4.11 system. Here is my >uname -a >FreeBSD pluto 4.11-RELEASE-p11 FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p11 #15: Tue Jul 26 >11:25:09 CAT 2005 sysjo@pluto:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/Pluto i386 > >The machine is a: >CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz (2093.22-MHz 686-class CPU) >with SCSI hard drives, an onboard fxp and onboard em NICs, and I have >bought a >http://www.etinc.com/product_info.php?products_id=32 >for the actual shaping. > >The BW software I am using is v3.24c. > >I have followed the install docs, not quite to the letter, because I had >to modify the /sys/conf/files from what they said to get the kernel to >compile. These are my modifications: > > #net/if_ethersubr.c optional ether > net/if_etherbwmgr.c optional ether > net/if_etherbwmgr.c optional bw > >I am not meant to put the last line there, but if I don't the kernel >compile complains that it can't find the bw device. I downloaded their driver, and compiled a new kernel without error. Here's what I did: # cd ~glenn # ftp ftp://ftp.etinc.com/pub/freebsd/freebsd411_bwmgr.tgz # gzip -d freebsd411_bwmgr.tgz # tar xf freebsd411_bwmgr.tar # cd usr/hdlc/dev # cp if_etherbwmgr.c /sys/net # cd /sys/net # emacs files (added net/if_etherbwmgr.c optional ether) (commented net/if_ethersubr.c # cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf # GENERIC test # emacs test (added options HW_WDOG) (added options PPP_DEFLATE) # cd /usr/src # make KERNCONF=test buildkernel I don't have one of their cards, so I can't test it, but it did compile properly. What were the errors you saw that prompted you to add the extra line to /sys/net/files ? >I have built the kernel (with my modifications) and the module etbwmgr >loads successfully: >Jul 26 12:50:33 pluto /kernel: ET/BWMGR Driver v3.24c Neither module would load. It fails with undefined symbols. (deflateInit_ for etbwmgr.ko and em_read_ctlext for etbypass.ko) This looks like the module they supply isn't really compatible with 4.11. -Glenn >If I try and load the et_bypass module (which I think is for the gigabit >failover card), i get (link_elf: symbol em_read_ctlext undefined). > >I have put >options HW_WDOG >into my kernel. > >If anyone can give me some pointers as to what to do, please let me >know. > >Regards, > >-John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 13:49:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5787116A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:49:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petersen@petersen.plus.com) Received: from britersen.co.uk (britersen.co.uk [212.159.80.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10F343D48 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:49:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petersen@petersen.plus.com) Received: from petersen (petersen@petersen.petenet.britersen.co.uk [192.168.1.1]) by britersen.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6QDn8Nu023261; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:49:09 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from petersen@petersen.plus.com) Message-Id: <200507261349.j6QDn8Nu023261@britersen.co.uk> From: "Petersen" To: "'Lei Sun'" Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:49:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Thread-Index: AcWRYfGHuaE7jdUGQNWpouShG6BDjgAhfWuA Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ssh over a very bad http proxy :( X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:49:12 -0000 Lei Sun wrote: > Hi > > I spent almost entire week, customizing my freebsd server at home, and > I would like to access it from my work place. > > But it doesn't seems to be possible without making http tunnels > through an authenticated proxy server. > > I tried to use http-tunnel, it doesn't support the > authenticated feature. If you're referring to www/httptunnel, then yes it does. I've personally used it to push ssh sessions via an authenticated http firewall. It's a little flakey when the http proxy does something it doesn't like (like closing the connection - it generally just crashes the hts process), but it does work. Works fine on cygwin too if you only have a windows machine at one end. Checkout the -P option. Petersen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 13:57:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3210D16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:57:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B179843D55 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:57:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 77017 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Jul 2005 13:57:37 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=GSR3Ls8CbeaTo9VSDbJg2TEpy/ZTXc3DKcxV0jGQj/TAFMFioXGfn4/33iHc8SxlgdMzCiqnWaOQrCH48ouOl6EePiaj3Pb5HUndLm68n0O4mft7ltHPsv6yfozA+PhlNQW6Xqy4iELsBcobPxVdQQ6YmO2XP4z0gMQqD+P/IUs= ; Message-ID: <20050726135737.77015.qmail@web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.114.187.133] by web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 06:57:37 PDT Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 06:57:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Danial Thom To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: re: ETINC BW Manager. Watchdog failover not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:57:39 -0000 >Neither module would load. It fails with >undefined symbols. (deflateInit_ >for etbwmgr.ko and em_read_ctlext for >etbypass.ko) > >This looks like the module they supply isn't >really compatible with 4.11. > > >-Glenn deflateInit_ is clearly part of DEFLATE option, so you likely didn't build your kernel properly. You say you don't have their bypass card, so why do you expect the bypass driver to load? Perhaps you need patches that you get when you buy a card? More curiously, why don't you ask them rather than us? Danial __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 14:02:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C640816A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:02:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from virgil.huston@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A53943D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:02:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from virgil.huston@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so1143547wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:01:59 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=L186U4ivbaju1LqccQaKaByOQAhW+LI0S5zzROCwIfX5x7bZ993lx+LmMZe9HG6+TZdHkZQB3WOCnZy0rHvSaySqGxy1Njx8/qBAwXRs/DHJCpJl2cWsuNxdzx4SnCbtv0OOpfulv2aQPeIuAMPnvENrVxeaXaZ8z04K6rcdmeY= Received: by 10.54.53.74 with SMTP id b74mr133257wra; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:01:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.78.17 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:01:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3cf08c81050726070172ffff69@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:01:59 -0400 From: virgil huston To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20050726074201.05224b50@209.152.117.178> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <3d48d9c80507252357277006c6@mail.gmail.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20050726074201.05224b50@209.152.117.178> Subject: Re: Need Help Installing FreeBSD with AMD x86 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: virgil huston List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:02:00 -0000 > At 01:57 7/26/2005, Corey Farwell, wrote: > >I have all the ISO's burned to a CD, but when I put the boot disk in to > >install, after I restart, it goes to the normal windows. I've already tr= ied > >going to the BIOS settings, but nothing there helped me. What do I do no= w? > >Corey Farwell Try hitting F12, F10, or F8 as the computer is booting up (with FreeBSD disk in the CD drive). That will usually give you an option to boot from CD, depending on what kind of computer you have. Or, go into bios and set to boot from CD first. Virgil Huston From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 14:05:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF0E16A420 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:05:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sysjo@hades.yoafrica.com) Received: from cortizone.yoafrica.com (cortizone.yoafrica.com [196.44.176.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7790543D4C for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:04:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sysjo@hades.yoafrica.com) Received: from hades.yoafrica.com ([196.44.177.50] ident=postfix) by cortizone.yoafrica.com with esmtp (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1DxQ2l-000ChK-U1; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:04:28 +0000 Received: by hades.yoafrica.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7A52961BC; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:04:26 +0200 (CAT) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:04:26 +0200 From: John Oxley To: Danial Thom Message-ID: <20050726140426.GE30728@yoafrica.com> References: <20050726135737.77015.qmail@web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="hwvH6HDNit2nSK4j" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050726135737.77015.qmail@web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ETINC BW Manager. Watchdog failover not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:05:02 -0000 --hwvH6HDNit2nSK4j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 06:57:37AM -0700, Danial Thom wrote: > More curiously, why don't you ask them rather > than us? I have, about 3 days ago, but I have not received any response from them. -John --hwvH6HDNit2nSK4j Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIIIkgYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIIIgzCCCH8CAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMAsGCSqGSIb3DQEHAaCC BhYwggLPMIICOKADAgECAgMO0a0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAj BgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQ ZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA1MDUzMTA2NTEzMloXDTA2MDUzMTA2 NTEzMlowQzEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEgMB4GCSqGSIb3DQEJ ARYRam9obkB5b2FmcmljYS5jb20wggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDa ZqyI7h6jGtwHQhbqtJlwQy9isJivpp+Cju1sorwJG0FE7Irqoc4impUG6aBGVFjunlMwA76A d6NInU9+KIwr1SRJO4d6qZQhUq810QMpj3vrn7TOtPbnrqKiK1tU//86WVuJHGVc3/4pYpmP jSSilAV8Gj+12YJlKP2ClbnkUF0PwDvEVlJxRjIqrW6Crl5SeCqyJ+JxFK7WQVQ6+nusuO37 0qj0FytU2IE8kxqveKstObVUwd0lQhNTS29e2ytvcNgXk2TrqlBhLpxV9xh/l52jYlRXk8aP HYxnWU/iJmXCgLl9NADpwaV3xajGyFMNSK1Plsm/r4GthtA5vdPXAgMBAAGjLjAsMBwGA1Ud EQQVMBOBEWpvaG5AeW9hZnJpY2EuY29tMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAD gYEAV+aYxxGXhdvzxI4uT4EAKvxdqGzZ1ZVAjoszmpNp2nLTMZ+juzSoqT+SiwoaLQia/T+m BIInP+JnRelE5up8zd1JXHxCjB8StssZNusEE8Hz2c/hZyAIyEdmRRY/mwlHntBu7nkNnmuq LuSeBR8g+ChtyOHZ+IyUnYDlWtUrLM4wggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUA MIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBl IFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0 aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1h aWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcN MDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcNMTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMc VGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFs IEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVz VftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnw K4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/EfkTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gE f6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8E PDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFp bENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8EBAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVM YWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSd f0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQcUCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2p nDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bGCE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYICRDCC AkACAQEwaTBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0 eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EC Aw7RrTAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoIGxMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcN AQkFMQ8XDTA1MDcyNjE0MDQyNlowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFOsV1VcwvBim1svqpDu5kOuy ofJHMFIGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFFMEMwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqG SIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBAHyF nALY9dqX/6Bo2uzmVs0xlM51zxeyJMxUt54zS8IelISG/p+2pSj6j4vL65unU66i5SoFKbP0 B3amhJoVOTWCg2VUplo56IiMCQkwmqFE/puIRDIwXNB16tB3Pxu49rQ08PTHjwe/SP83Mf3O GlUD9sAbdJFt6SXxc67pBToVU34L4zNmcwZE5emrxevQpEClBxtnsPkv6QNKjXqBjvMvpQAf jvCGrJazMN+XVVvz//bu41ebPfhdN3kYM7e0aK/1XivsjUzhC4aQd8sTnj+WOxWvgtqb14ZL ZijnM5VFrnRvzwe3BUKcPCCVKueSjZW5bXFrZ+C5+b9zqu9tyPI= --hwvH6HDNit2nSK4j-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 14:26:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E643F16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:26:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6848643D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:26:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.246.232] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A7F96E5B0032; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:26:01 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6QEQthq021352; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:26:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6QEQoNm021349; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:26:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: Corey Farwell References: <3d48d9c80507252357277006c6@mail.gmail.com> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:26:50 -0700 In-Reply-To: <3d48d9c80507252357277006c6@mail.gmail.com> (Corey Farwell's message of "Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:57:28 -0700") Message-ID: <5l1x5l1w45.x5l@mail.opusnet.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Need Help Installing FreeBSD with AMD x86 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:26:16 -0000 Corey Farwell writes: > I have all the ISO's burned to a CD, but when I put the boot disk in to > install, after I restart, it goes to the normal windows. I've already tried > going to the BIOS settings, but nothing there helped me. What do I do now? You can download two floppies (kern.flp & mfsroot.flp) from FTP site where you got the ISOs, or get them off the CD if you can mount that. Burn to floppies like this (as root): dd if=kern.flp of=/dev/fd0 bs=1440k dd if=mfsroot.flp of=/dev/fd0 bs=1440k Boot kern.flop and follow instructions, eventually telling it to get distributions from CD/DVD. You probably ought to first try this to test your burning of the CD a bit (use acd0 or cd0): mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0 /mnt cd /mnt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 14:27:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2156916A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:27:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.119]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D31D43D5D for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:27:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 52993 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Jul 2005 14:27:42 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=2JJX+QuW25LtWDCF6gUyHOu6rRXGEmSjbrzxFx35xiPkflHlJVBcJOTlw3R+t7dwa/VcuX8/YzliKV5Eamje6Ixz8JKvkgDyCB7W4Nzr/evpRVhBwk/MvdxgFyHfLkIDiBQXxedGsy1jbte9+vRJm9vGzNItOEsXVD//9bxgf30= ; Message-ID: <20050726142742.52991.qmail@web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.114.187.133] by web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:27:41 PDT Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:27:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Danial Thom To: John Oxley In-Reply-To: <20050726140426.GE30728@yoafrica.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ETINC BW Manager. Watchdog failover not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:27:43 -0000 --- John Oxley wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 06:57:37AM -0700, > Danial Thom wrote: > > More curiously, why don't you ask them rather > > than us? > > I have, about 3 days ago, but I have not > received any response from > them. Did you get a ticket#? They usually answer me within 10 minutes during US business hours. Danial ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 14:51:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205B816A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:51:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kl@os.lv) Received: from paipala.latnet.lv (paipala.latnet.lv [159.148.1.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A7DA43D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:51:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kl@os.lv) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by paipala.latnet.lv (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6FA4C702 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:51:30 +0300 (EEST) Received: from paipala.latnet.lv ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (paipala.latnet.lv [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23722-16 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:51:28 +0300 (EEST) Received: from os.lv (unknown [159.148.155.3]) by paipala.latnet.lv (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CCD34C3B1 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:50:15 +0300 (EEST) Received: from 80.70.26.44 ([80.70.26.44]) by os.lv (WinRoute Pro 4.1) with SMTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:53:06 +0300 Message-ID: <42E64D9E.5080106@os.lv> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:50:06 +0300 From: Casper User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050720) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.2.1 (20041222) at latnet.lv Subject: jail networking X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:51:28 -0000 Hi, I have problem with setuping network to jail... I have #uname -a FreeBSD gam.zuze.lv 5.4-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD Wed Jul 20 19:52:44 EEST 2005 and installed jail on it... sysctl: net.inet.ip.forwarding: 1 security.jail.set_hostname_allowed: 1 security.jail.socket_unixiproute_only: 1 security.jail.sysvipc_allowed: 0 security.jail.getfsstatroot_only: 1 security.jail.allow_raw_sockets: 1 security.jail.chflags_allowed: 0 security.jail.jailed: 0 from host ping: # ping www.google.lv PING www.l.google.com (216.239.59.104): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 216.239.59.104: icmp_seq=0 ttl=245 time=64.608 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.59.104: icmp_seq=1 ttl=245 time=65.198 ms 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss from jail: jail# ping www.google.lv PING www.l.google.com (216.239.59.99): 56 data bytes ^C --- www.l.google.com ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss but traceroute from jail show every second packet: 4 latnet.to.lattelekom.lv (195.13.173.221) 4.324 ms * 4.810 ms 5 * so-4-0-0-war1.lnt.cw.net (166.63.222.101) 54.223 ms * 6 so-7-0-0-zcr2.lnt.cw.net (166.63.222.42) 72.205 ms * 54.778 ms 7 * 195.66.226.125 (195.66.226.125) 90.496 ms * 8 216.239.46.173 (216.239.46.173) 54.711 ms * 54.204 ms 9 * 216.239.49.254 (216.239.49.254) 64.939 ms * 10 216.239.49.121 (216.239.49.121) 67.530 ms * 216.239.49.114 (216.239.49.114) 68.128 ms 11 * 216.239.59.103 (216.239.59.103) 64.615 ms * From jail I can ping router and local network ips... My pf.conf: ext_if="rl0" int_if="rl1" internal_net="172.22.1.0/24" external_addr="xx.xx.xx.xx" table { 10.0.0.0/8, 127.0.0.0/8, 172.22.0.0/24, 192.168.0.0/24 } set loginterface $ext_if set block-policy return scrub in all nat on $ext_if from $internal_net to any -> ($ext_if) pass in all pass out all pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $ext_if port 22 keep state pass out on $ext_if proto { tcp, udp } all keep state pass in on $ext_if proto { tcp, udp } from any to port 80 keep state pass out on $ext_if from 192.168.0.0/24 to any keep state queue developers pass out on $ext_if from 192.168.1.0/24 to any keep state queue marketing There is some manual about jail networking? I don`t understand why not working jail network if I can ping router from jail, routes ok and traceroute strange packets... tnx, Casper From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 14:51:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B112C16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:51:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from minotaur@crow.padonki.org.ua) Received: from crow.padonki.org.ua (crow.padonki.org.ua [213.186.192.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3993D43D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:51:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from minotaur@crow.padonki.org.ua) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=crow.padonki.org.ua) by crow.padonki.org.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1DxQm4-000D6R-2c; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:51:19 +0300 Received: (from minotaur@localhost) by crow.padonki.org.ua (8.13.1/8.13.3/Submit) id j6QEpFUe050370; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:51:15 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from minotaur) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:51:15 +0300 From: Alexander Shikoff To: Sean Hafeez Message-ID: <20050726145115.GA49931@crow.padonki.org.ua> References: <90D2C0FA-439C-4E76-B5D1-79EE06AF2E4C@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-u Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <90D2C0FA-439C-4E76-B5D1-79EE06AF2E4C@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: minotaur@crow.padonki.org.ua X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on crow.padonki.org.ua); Unknown failure Cc: Supote Lee , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What OID for this? SNMP issue. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:51:40 -0000 Hi, On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 04:36:44PM -0700, Sean Hafeez wrote: > Target[merlot-cpusum]:ssCpuRawUser.0&ssCpuRawUser.0:public@127.0.0.1 > + ssCpuRawSystem.0&ssCpuRawSystem.0:public@127.0.0.1 + ssCpuRawNice. > 0&ssCpuRawNice.0:public@127.0.0.1 > MaxBytes[merlot-cpusum]: 100 > Title[merlot-cpusum]: merlot.beastproject.org - active cpu utilization > PageTop[merlot-cpusum]:

merlot.beastproject.org - active cpu > utilization

> Unscaled[merlot-cpusum]: ymwd ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ... For a long time I observe the strange issue. Marked string is commented out if my MRTG-config file. And it is possible that values drawn on the graph can be greater than 100%! Can anybody explain how raw counters (ssCpuRawSystem, ssCpuRawUser etc.) are calculated? And why graph even for one of them (not for sum) can grow over 100%? Thanks. -- Kind Regards, Alexander Shikoff minotaur@crete.org.ua Mob.: +380 67 946 31 49 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 15:20:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0256016A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:20:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Received: from gorgo.centroin.com.br (gorgo.centroin.com.br [200.225.63.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF2B43D72 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:20:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Received: from hypselo.centroin.com.br (hypselo.centroin.com.br [200.225.63.1]) by gorgo.centroin.com.br (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j6QFKMea008034 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:20:22 -0300 (EST) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:20:22 -0300 (EST) From: Sender: To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Subject: sysctl deadmantimer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:20:29 -0000 Hi all, =09In the BSD/OS there is a kernel countdown counter that can be used to reboot the machine in case of lock. It=B4s called deadmantimer. =09I used to put a cron entry to preset this counter every 3 min, so if it goes to zero the server is rebooted. =09In the past it save me some times. =09Is there anything like this in Freebsd? - Marcelo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 15:36:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D9E16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:36:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emin@mccme.ru) Received: from ns.mccme.ru (ns.mccme.ru [62.117.108.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E65A43D5F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:36:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emin@mccme.ru) Received: from mccme.ru (IDENT:root@mccme.ru [62.117.108.7]) by ns.mccme.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6QFlNKA018883 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:47:23 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from emin@mccme.ru) Received: from mccme.ru (IDENT:emin@localhost.mccme.ru [127.0.0.1]) by mccme.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA28570 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:35:47 +0400 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:35:47 +0400 From: "Eugene M. Minkovskii" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050726153547.GA27219@mccme.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: MCCME Moscow X-MCCME-Spam: No, score=0.054 required=5 tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO, SPF_HELO_PASS Subject: mplayer broke FreeBSD console X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:36:11 -0000 Hello. I'm using mplayer to play audio mp3 files in console WITHOUT X. Console is in VESA_132x50 mode. My mplayer broke console. It seems like symbol \r does not catch properly. But in Rxvt or Xterm all correct. So, I forced to use -quiet option when I use mplayer in console. Versions: MPlayer 1.0pre7-3.4.2 (C) 2000-2005 MPlayer Team CPU: Intel Celeron 2/Pentium III Coppermine,Geyserville (Family: 6, Stepping: 6) Detected cache-line size is 32 bytes CPUflags: MMX: 1 MMX2: 1 3DNow: 0 3DNow2: 0 SSE: 1 SSE2: 0 complied for i386 CPU with extensions MMX MMX2 SSE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD kernel: device sc options SC_HISTORY_SIZE=1000 options SC_PIXEL_MODE -- Sensory yours, Eugene Minkovskii óÅÎÓÏÒÎÏ ×ÁÛ, å×ÇÅÎÉÊ íÉÎØËÏ×ÓËÉÊ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 15:36:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326BE16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:36:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars.lindblad@bostreammail.net) Received: from mailhost.bostream.com (mailhost.bostream.com [81.26.227.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5E043D4C for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:36:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars.lindblad@bostreammail.net) Received: from bostreammail.net (mailhost.bostream.com [81.26.227.69]) by mailhost.bostream.com (8.12.4/8.12.1) with SMTP id j6QFat9P016283; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:36:55 +0200 (MEST) Sender: lars.lindblad@bostreammail.net From: "lars.lindblad" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: "webmail.bostream.com" Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:36:55 +0100 Message-id: <42e65897.3f99.16838@bostreammail.net> Subject: FreeBSD-newbie! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.lindblad@bostreammail.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:36:55 -0000 Hi. My name is Lars and lives in Sweden. I have finally bought FreeBSD 5.2 and the handbook from the FreeBSD-mall. That's great! I've wanted to leave the Windows-world and I have been testing Linux for a few years. But I have some problems with my FreeBSD-installation, and I hope someone here can help me! Facts: FreeBSD5.2 (feb 2004 version), IBM Thinkpad (laptop with 300Mhz Intel II, 96Mb RAM and 20Gb HDD. 1. Since I have been used to KDE over the years, I have decided to continue with that, but it locks up the entire computer - sometimes when I start KDE, and mostly when I shut it down. 2. In frustration over KDE-issues I tested Gnome. Quite pretty Window Manager, but I never got any working keyboard there. Ideas? And can I run KDE-applications in Gnome? I use Kstars a lot. 3. In Sweden we have some exciting extra wovels... but the keymaps never seem to find them. What do I do wrong? What kind of a keyboard do I have on a Thinkpad anyway?! At some configurations I've got the > and <, but no ~, and of course the opposite has also happened. Um... I think that's all for now. Hope someone can help! Thanks in advance! / Lars From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 15:38:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0D816A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:38:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars.lindblad@bostreammail.net) Received: from mailhost.bostream.com (mailhost.bostream.com [81.26.227.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5299C43D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:38:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars.lindblad@bostreammail.net) Received: from bostreammail.net (mailhost.bostream.com [81.26.227.69]) by mailhost.bostream.com (8.12.4/8.12.1) with SMTP id j6QFc19P017982; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:38:01 +0200 (MEST) Sender: lars.lindblad@bostreammail.net From: "lars.lindblad" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: "webmail.bostream.com" Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:38:01 +0100 Message-id: <42e658d9.463b.16838@bostreammail.net> Subject: FreeBSD-newbie! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars.lindblad@bostreammail.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:38:02 -0000 Hi. My name is Lars and lives in Sweden. I have finally bought FreeBSD 5.2 and the handbook from the FreeBSD-mall. That's great! I've wanted to leave the Windows-world and I have been testing Linux for a few years. But I have some problems with my FreeBSD-installation, and I hope someone here can help me! Facts: FreeBSD5.2 (feb 2004 version), IBM Thinkpad (laptop with 300Mhz Intel II, 96Mb RAM and 20Gb HDD. 1. Since I have been used to KDE over the years, I have decided to continue with that, but it locks up the entire computer - sometimes when I start KDE, and mostly when I shut it down. 2. In frustration over KDE-issues I tested Gnome. Quite pretty Window Manager, but I never got any working keyboard there. Ideas? And can I run KDE-applications in Gnome? I use Kstars a lot. 3. In Sweden we have some exciting extra wovels... but the keymaps never seem to find them. What do I do wrong? What kind of a keyboard do I have on a Thinkpad anyway?! At some configurations I've got the > and <, but no ~, and of course the opposite has also happened. Um... I think that's all for now. Hope someone can help! Thanks in advance! / Lars From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 15:54:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACC216A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:54:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "") Received: from mail6.atl.registeredsite.com (mail6.atl.registeredsite.com [64.224.219.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9199243D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:54:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "") Received: from pluto.hosting4u.net (pluto.hosting4u.net [209.35.191.118]) by mail6.atl.registeredsite.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j6QFsDdB018516 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:54:13 GMT Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:54:13 GMT Received: from pluto ([209.35.191.118]) by pluto.hosting4u.net ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:54:13 -0500 From: X-Rcpt-To: Message-ID: <112239325301@pluto.hosting4u.net> To: Cc: Subject: Thank you for your submission! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:54:19 -0000 http://www.myclassics.com You e-mail is very important to us at MyClassics.com and we appreciate your taking time to e-mail us. Due to the large amount of e-mail we receive, our staff will review your e-mail shortly. Once again, Thank You! MyClassics.com Staff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 15:58:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADDCA16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:58:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jaapb@kerguelen.org) Received: from societe.kerguelen.org (catv9079.extern.kun.nl [131.174.119.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C31B43D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:58:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jaapb@kerguelen.org) Received: from societe.kerguelen.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by societe.kerguelen.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6QFwrr0027581 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:58:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (jaapb@localhost) by societe.kerguelen.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6QFwqkF025067 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:58:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:58:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Jaap Boender To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Strange bootloader problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:58:56 -0000 Hi all, Well, here's one for the books. I've got a Dell Latitude D610, and yesterday I upgraded the BIOS to its newest version (A04). This worked nicely, but after the upgrade, the third stage bootloader won't boot the kernel anymore. I can get to the boot loader from grub, but then it says 'can't find kernel' and that's it. If I try a ls it says 'no such file or directory' - incidentally, the file system itself is okay, if I boot from a fixit CD with -a and use the hard disk as the root partition, it all works fine. I've tried installing FreeBSD from scratch on another partition, with the same result. The only thing that goes wrong is /boot/loader not being able to load the kernel. Well, that and grub not being able to boot the kernel directly, but that might very well just be Grub... So now I'm stumped. Does anyone have any advice? I'm running 5.4-STABLE, just cvsupped, built and installed an hour ago. Thanks, Jaap Boender From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 16:00:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9026916A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:00:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emin@mccme.ru) Received: from ns.mccme.ru (ns.mccme.ru [62.117.108.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD92F43D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:00:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emin@mccme.ru) Received: from mccme.ru (IDENT:root@mccme.ru [62.117.108.7]) by ns.mccme.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6QGCZKA021980; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:12:35 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from emin@mccme.ru) Received: from mccme.ru (IDENT:emin@localhost.mccme.ru [127.0.0.1]) by mccme.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA00990; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:00:59 +0400 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:00:59 +0400 From: "Eugene M. Minkovskii" To: "lars.lindblad" Message-ID: <20050726160059.GA29878@mccme.ru> References: <42e658d9.463b.16838@bostreammail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <42e658d9.463b.16838@bostreammail.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: MCCME Moscow X-MCCME-Spam: No, score=0.054 required=5 tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO, SPF_HELO_PASS Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD-newbie! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:00:49 -0000 On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 04:38:01PM +0100, lars.lindblad wrote: " " Hi. " " My name is Lars and lives in Sweden. I have finally bought " FreeBSD 5.2 and the handbook from the FreeBSD-mall. That's " great! I've wanted to leave the Windows-world and I have " been testing Linux for a few years. " " But I have some problems with my FreeBSD-installation, and I " hope someone here can help me! " " Facts: FreeBSD5.2 (feb 2004 version), IBM Thinkpad (laptop " with 300Mhz Intel II, 96Mb RAM and 20Gb HDD. It seems to me, more wise is to use FreeBSD 5.4 in laptop, because FreeBSD 5.2 was some problems in ACPI. thats problems was fixed in latest releases. " 1. Since I have been used to KDE over the years, I have " decided to continue with that, but it locks up the entire " computer - sometimes when I start KDE, and mostly when I " shut it down. Perhaps you should turn off ACPI. First of all try to boot witout ACPI (I don't remember, but it seems to me this is a second item in boot menu), if this bring good resalt to you, go to the /boot/device.hints and add to this file following line: hint.acpi.0.disable="1" " 2. In frustration over KDE-issues I tested Gnome. Quite " pretty Window Manager, but I never got any working keyboard " there. Ideas? And can I run KDE-applications in Gnome? I use " Kstars a lot. " " 3. In Sweden we have some exciting extra wovels... but the " keymaps never seem to find them. What do I do wrong? What " kind of a keyboard do I have on a Thinkpad anyway?! At some " configurations I've got the > and <, but no ~, and of course " the opposite has also happened. I think you don't configure your X properly. Perhaps you may copy paste your language settings from Linux, which you tested "for a few years". I use WindowMaker and run many KDE and GNOMEs progrums under it. Moreover, I'm a russian user. This is "much more hard" language for localization, then sweden. We have more then 3 different encodings, more then 2 different input-maps. " Um... I think that's all for now. Hope someone can help! " Thanks in advance! " " / Lars " _______________________________________________ " freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list " http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions " To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Sensory yours, Eugene Minkovskii óÅÎÓÏÒÎÏ ×ÁÛ, å×ÇÅÎÉÊ íÉÎØËÏ×ÓËÉÊ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 16:37:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E00C16A420 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:37:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dennisolvany@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40FA043D48 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:37:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dennisolvany@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id r35so620971rna for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:37:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=P7yedSMpx5Arm3bm07D0RIJ1JayHCO43s/44s5ZBs/CiP6L7dQSbBuXHyKt85p1uI4eNI9YdO4tiN0cgvQUvV7FPZS4HWMWkX58sVs4LQzPpVfJok4qJwHHugX+22yBOMg2o52Uiyy1fErLcHCxW7zK0zVqOWdf5bqwYL7Gdp/U= Received: by 10.38.73.55 with SMTP id v55mr2219638rna; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:37:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dm ([67.102.60.210]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id g2sm2761083rne.2005.07.26.09.37.11; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:37:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <000601c59200$45b6a460$0866a8c0@dm> From: "Dennis Olvany" To: , Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:37:10 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: beta 6 usb keyboard issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:37:13 -0000 I attempted to install 6 beta without success. As with earlier versions, = the default installer does not recognize a usb keyboard. Earlier = versions had the simple menu, "Push 7 for usb keyboard." I don't want to = know how to accomplish this in freebsd 6, I want it to be intuitive! Why = not make it ultra-intuitive and support usb keyboards by default? This = really needs to be ironed out by release time. There has got to be a = better way. (Hint: The old way was better.) Any replies need to be = directly addressed, I do not monitor the list. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 17:40:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8ED16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:40:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikef@ack.Berkeley.EDU) Received: from malcolm.berkeley.edu (malcolm.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.206.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4687B43D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:40:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikef@ack.Berkeley.EDU) Received: from malcolm.berkeley.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by malcolm.berkeley.edu (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6QHeYHZ072659 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:40:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mikef@ack.Berkeley.EDU) Received: from localhost (mikef@localhost) by malcolm.berkeley.edu (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) with ESMTP id j6QHeYTr072656 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:40:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mikef@ack.Berkeley.EDU) X-Authentication-Warning: malcolm.berkeley.edu: mikef owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:40:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Friedman X-X-Sender: mikef@malcolm.berkeley.edu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050726103124.S67832@malcolm.berkeley.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (malcolm.berkeley.edu [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:40:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: fastcgi port fixed but not updated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:40:34 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've recently discovered a problem report for the mod_fastcgi (2.4.2) port: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/79774. The report seems to indicate that the port was fixed shortly after the PR was sent (May 31), yet I just did a cvsup and the buggy port still shows up. I have made the fix to my copy of the port and it does work, but why isn't the fixed version available via cvsup? My cvsup log (run just this morning) shows that the fastcgi Makefile was checked out, yet its date is still early on May 31, apparently just before the fix was done, according to the PR. Anyone know what might be going on? Since the fastcgi port is called by the rt-3.4.2 port (which is my real interest), keeping my fixed version of the former around under a different name is not really a good option, in case I need to update RT. Thanks. Mike _____________________________________________________________________ Mike Friedman System and Network Security mikef@ack.Berkeley.EDU 2484 Shattuck Avenue 1-510-642-1410 University of California at Berkeley http://ack.Berkeley.EDU/~mikef http://security.berkeley.edu _____________________________________________________________________ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQA/AwUBQuZ1jq0bf1iNr4mCEQIOfACgk8PCCvxZ63wS8fNRkVFo63RYUP8AoJZ1 pYE15oKcDbAnKtDVMKrcBzVi =r/OJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 17:43:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E267916A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:43:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Received: from gorgo.centroin.com.br (gorgo.centroin.com.br [200.225.63.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E21943D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:43:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Received: from hypselo.centroin.com.br (hypselo.centroin.com.br [200.225.63.1]) by gorgo.centroin.com.br (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j6QHhCea018480 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:43:12 -0300 (EST) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:43:12 -0300 (EST) From: Sender: To: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Subject: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:43:18 -0000 Hi All, =09I=B4m trying to enable the hardware monitoring with "lmmon" on an Intel server board, based on ICH2 chipset, but when I put the following line in the kernel config file: device ichsmb I get this error messages: In file included from /usr/src/sys/dev/ichsmb/ichsmb.c:64: /usr/src/sys/dev/ichsmb/ichsmb_var.h:44:22: smbus_if.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/sys/dev/ichsmb/ichsmb_pci.c:66: /usr/src/sys/dev/ichsmb/ichsmb_var.h:44:22: smbus_if.h: No such file or directory mkdep: compile failed *** Error code 1 What is wrong? FreeBSD 5.4 - Marcelo Souza From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 17:45:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A6E16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:45:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Received: from gorgo.centroin.com.br (gorgo.centroin.com.br [200.225.63.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062D743D48 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:45:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Received: from hypselo.centroin.com.br (hypselo.centroin.com.br [200.225.63.1]) by gorgo.centroin.com.br (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j6QHjuea018715 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:45:56 -0300 (EST) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:45:56 -0300 (EST) From: Sender: To: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Subject: hardware monitor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:45:58 -0000 Hi, =09Just to put a subject... On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 scuba@centroin.com.br wrote: |Hi All, | | |=09I=B4m trying to enable the hardware monitoring with "lmmon" on an |Intel server board, based on ICH2 chipset, but when I put the following |line in the kernel config file: | | |device ichsmb | | |I get this error messages: | |In file included from /usr/src/sys/dev/ichsmb/ichsmb.c:64: |/usr/src/sys/dev/ichsmb/ichsmb_var.h:44:22: smbus_if.h: No such file or |directory |In file included from /usr/src/sys/dev/ichsmb/ichsmb_pci.c:66: |/usr/src/sys/dev/ichsmb/ichsmb_var.h:44:22: smbus_if.h: No such file or |directory |mkdep: compile failed |*** Error code 1 | | |What is wrong? | |FreeBSD 5.4 | | |- Marcelo Souza | |_______________________________________________ |freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list |http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions |To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" | - Marcelo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 17:53:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E379916A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:53:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmwassman@cox.net) Received: from lakermmtao02.cox.net (lakermmtao02.cox.net [68.230.240.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A38F43D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:53:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmwassman@cox.net) Received: from smtp.east.cox.net ([172.18.52.57]) by lakermmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with SMTP id <20050726175324.LZLW14195.lakermmtao02.cox.net@smtp.east.cox.net> for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:53:24 -0400 X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.15 (webedge20-101-1103-20040528) From: To: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:53:25 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050726175324.LZLW14195.lakermmtao02.cox.net@smtp.east.cox.net> Subject: Microsoft Wireless Intellimouse 1.0 not work? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:53:32 -0000 Hello all, I have googled to no avail. I have a Microsoft Wireless USB Intellimouse 1.0. I would like to use it on my FreeBSD 5.4 system. It recognizes the mouse but I can't get it to work. I have read that some people can get it to work, that there is a patch I need to apply to the kernel to get it to work, that the first byte sent by the mouse is unknown and that the usm driver is expecting a directional bit. Does anyone know if I can use this mouse with FreeBSD? Is anyone using this mouse with FreeBSD? And if so, how did you get it to work? I have tried so far loading the intellimouse driver in sysinstall to no avail ( as I expected as it is used for a serial port mouse and moused will not load with nothing in the ps/2 port). Thanks in advanced David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 18:02:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4495C16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:02:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C552043D49 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:02:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.246.232] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id AAB3346E006C; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:02:27 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6QI3DLI024540; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:03:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6QI37gw024539; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:03:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: Jaap Boender References: From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:03:07 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Jaap Boender's message of "Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:58:52 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange bootloader problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:02:32 -0000 Jaap Boender writes: > So now I'm stumped. Does anyone have any advice? I'm running 5.4-STABLE, just > cvsupped, built and installed an hour ago. Since you changed your BIOS, I'm suspecting something fishy with the BIOS settings for disk geometry, like not LBA or something, but you've probably already checked the BIOS setup... Read the boot(8) manpage paragraph starting with "However," which says how to by-pass "/boot/loader" and maybe try that. Also, loader(8) manpage has a boot_verbose variable that might help. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 18:15:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4293816A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:15:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brian.barto@spectrum-health.org) Received: from mail.spectrum-health.org (mail.spectrum-health.org [167.73.110.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D432743D49 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:15:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brian.barto@spectrum-health.org) Received: from DCMSMTA01.spectrum-health.org ([10.3.29.53]) by mail.spectrum-health.org (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005072614170700638 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:17:07 -0400 Received: by DCMSMTA01.spectrum-health.org with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2658.3) id ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:15:24 -0400 Message-ID: From: brian.barto@spectrum-health.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:15:21 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2658.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Serving passive ftp through ipfilter and ipnat X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:15:25 -0000 Hi all. I have an freebsd ftp server behind a freebsd firewall. The firewall is using ipfilter and ipnat. Everything works great except for my ftp service (have http and smtp too). I am trying to set it up to be passive which i understand is better for those who connect to my server. The way it stands right now, users can connect and login, but can't get a directory listing. They get an error that says "Can't build the data connection: no route to host". I have adjusted the following sysctls to limit the data ports that ftpd uses: net.inet.ip.portrange.hifirst: 60000 net.inet.ip.portrange.hilast: 65000 To accomidate this port range I have the following in my ipf.rules: pass out proto tcp all keep state pass in quick on fxp1 proto tcp from any to any port 60000 >< 65000 flags S keep state My ipnat.rules file contains the following entry to forward port 21 to my ftp server (X.X.X.X = external ip): rdr fxp1 X.X.X.X/32 port 21 -> 192.168.1.2 port 21 That's basically all I have set up. I think I need to somehow redirect ports 60000 - 65000 to my ftp server to get it to work but I don't know how without putting in 5000 entries in my ipnat.rules. If that's not it, i'm lost. Any suggestions? Thanks, Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 19:08:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650AC16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:08:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from perikillo@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E468F43D53 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:08:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from perikillo@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id r35so20414rna for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:07:59 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=EMrQzEWWEJDbieswIIWqd8v+DJubQleEf8GA1ZnB6FoTsFBLj6xhKO0RbztxFHGEo/FE+6Sek79JXwRRSjuymhtBDNOYfz5lhbv4mMulGUj3bktMNcYpl1x3Po0dqv967vfdzzhhQdRk2ygYrCn0rgjOX27sMRuAQ7YPF8SHVHk= Received: by 10.38.12.76 with SMTP id 76mr46115rnl; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:07:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.98.73 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:07:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51d7a516050726120711c23992@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:07:59 -0700 From: perikillo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <51d7a51605071208443629371f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <51d7a5160507070850d8813b1@mail.gmail.com> <200507120928.34468.bernhard.fischer@fh-stpoelten.ac.at> <51d7a51605071208443629371f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Xorg 6.8.2 Big Problems.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: perikillo List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:08:06 -0000 On 7/12/05, perikillo wrote: > >On 7/12/05, Bernhard Fischer wrote= : > > Hy Perikillo! > > > > I still have the same problem, and also no solution. > > One time I thought I had one, but I was mistaken :-((( > > > > Regards, > > bh > > > > > Hi Fischer, i test with 5-stable and the same problem, right now > iam goint to continue with 5.2.1, this one like i say before, really > works for me and my keyboard, i already test with. Give a try Fischer. >=20 > I only test 5.4-Release to see the X system, i have running 4.11 > without any problems, but i want to test the 5 stuff. >=20 > But let see what happend, any information about i let you know > Fischer see you. >=20 About this problem, yesterday a buy one new keyboard Genius with a lot of keys on it, i think 24, i really dont remember, but the case is that i install again xorg 6.8.2 on a fresh new 5.4 release install, without any buildworld or kernel, i think thats not really important to test my X system. =20 The think is that i let my system instaling xorg from ports, on my P2, and this morning went i wake up and the installation finish with any errors. Them i setup my X system following the Handbook and went i run the server... My keyboard was working with the Xterm, i am really happy, i dont make to much test on it, because i have to work, but i dont see any problems, all my keys where display on the X system, today after work, i will install some Windows Manager and make the last test, if everything goes great, i will make the buildworld process. Fisher after some weeks, i see light, maybe was my standard 104 keyboard that dosent comunicate very well with the new driver kbd on xorg 6.8.2, because i was running xorg < 6.8.2 on freebsd 5.2.1, but the problem here is that this release is not good, a lot of ports are broken, this way i invest on one new kbd and try this way, and is working. =20 Hope, you already have working xorg 6.8.2. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 19:44:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5343516A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:44:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eric@pretorious.net) Received: from mail.leaguehost.net (node-423a611b.sjc.onnet.us.uu.net [66.58.97.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2069843D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:44:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eric@pretorious.net) Received: from [192.168.4.115] (adsl-69-227-121-18.dsl.scrm01.pacbell.net [69.227.121.18]) by mail.leaguehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F321BF64 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:55:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Eric Pretorious To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:19:07 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507261219.08111.eric@pretorious.net> Cc: Subject: ipfw: deny traffic between interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: eric@pretorious.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:44:13 -0000 I'm using FreeBSD 4.10 as a masquerading firewall for three private networks and want to restrict traffic between each interface (kind of like VLAN's). The firewall's interfaces are configured as such: sis0 public rl0 192.168.1.1 fxp0 192.168.2.1 sis1 192.168.4.1 ...and ipfw is configured as such: 00050 13453519 8660535275 divert 8668 ip from any to any via sis0 00100 490 81262 allow ip from any to any via lo0 00200 0 0 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 00300 0 0 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 65000 26955802 17357286222 allow ip from any to any 65535 0 0 deny ip from any to any How can I accomplish this with ipfw? (I thought that something like `ipfw add 400 deny ip from rl0 to not sis0` would do the job but it didn't.) -- Eric P., Truckee, CA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 19:50:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F158516A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:50:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ces.fci@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2DF43D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:50:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ces.fci@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i21so21680wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:50:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=N5GbmbeMkUwgdCr29qON0dhqOmeLP/Wi5pjNZRfTQf8ddxM0x7T/U52439vAGw77Me59qwzQWIKPEFVwUXTpjjueb7XEulMPXvH2gzRqsCPaKlGx2KxpOwMBiICQSWBQoLIvszuotuidJ0VDmU7PWqoRDpnVkKNqwwzf1f0PupE= Received: by 10.54.13.59 with SMTP id 59mr58737wrm; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:50:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.113.5 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:50:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:50:28 -0500 From: fci To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: samba / hard drive issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fci List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:50:33 -0000 this box is only going to be running ssh and samba. I setup three drives, 1 for the OS and 1 for the primary samba share, and the other to backup the primary nightly. when I would copy files from the primary to the backup I would get an error similar to this: "Warning - WRITE_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retry request)" so I did some googling and found disabling DMA might fix it (in loader.conf I added hw.ata.ata_dma=3D"0") now I get this error about every 10mins: inetd[473]: netbios-ns/udp: bind: Address already in use inetd[473]: netbios-ssn/tcp: bind: Address already in use c From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 20:00:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4574416A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:00:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90AA43D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:00:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so25544wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:00:49 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=KAsHMxe5QpN+uXHEOfrEuaISGrQbrHkvIfKrvG1dCgrwEraVy7dq+xFu4hWoyNQz12p7aN4sDt3PXZpzvh7fRJFei2lvQLK+PbtnJeBWy9vt6XtI2eRjj+Tn0g+6DEApb4Uw5qhhZJU6iyoe+0eYuFDcHZdqb5BOowqx5S0s5qE= Received: by 10.54.27.50 with SMTP id a50mr49308wra; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:00:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:00:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:00:49 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: FreeBSD - Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: FreeBSD 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:00:51 -0000 Do I always need to run 'make cleandepend' when rebuilding a kernel, normally I build my kernels the old school way? Is it just me or is -O2 now the default for kernel builds? What about -Os, safe to use? The kernel build failed when it tired to compile the r128drm device. Is it safe to run the ULE scheduler instead of the 4BSD scheduler, ULE is commented out in the default kernel? Is the new ATA RAID stuff, metadata something, going to be backported to 5.x? I'm trying setup a RAID 1 mirror with Intel ICH5R / Adaptec HostRAID but it looks like it's not supported in 5.x ---------- Feel free to add more questions to this thread. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 20:01:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED9D16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:01:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tummytech@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C6B43D49 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:01:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tummytech@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so27928rne for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:01:32 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=eZWAVDhHYIig8a13qKCOOwb+Bt9h242gKQT4ce99zd4Q+shsCJzWGdV8nMoB2KhiJTjUiisMpbtEIm9ebCcmlLOUSKEYFduyeDNnKyrp0HWG2t1t/wHrgY/RHXpjh3+Dl2p1MI41+GOty6UgeBVEyg28KzL1vjjFaqlNnasLG7U= Received: by 10.38.92.16 with SMTP id p16mr87889rnb; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:01:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.88.61 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:01:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <860807bf050726130120f5ccff@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:01:32 -0700 From: Benson Wong To: FreeBSD Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Load much higher after upgrading to 5.4-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Benson Wong List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:01:33 -0000 Hi,=20 I upgraded from 5.4-STABLE (about 5 months old) to 5.4-STABLE as of last Sunday. Went through the standard procedure, buildkernel, buildworld, install kernel, install world, mergemaster, etc. The system functions normally except now load on the system hovers around 2.4 average, where it used to be around 0.5. From what I can tell nothing much has changed. The system works as an NFS server for Maildirs. It is working normally, and I see no performance problems, however the load seems to be much higher (graphed with MRTG ever 5 minutes). Anybody else encounter this? Offer any insights?=20 Thanks.=20 Ben. --=20 blog: http://www.mostlygeek.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 20:07:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FE416A420 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:07:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D50A43D48 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:07:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so26814wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:07:46 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=n5j/JxJ2uOuA0kL7r4KiG8XMEEOv2f08U1KnRsOHOza4fjteWMV0sqYZhhtcip8/lkZdgTUUtpaDmX1k+/xIE63EMYS8mw/RqiDkWyRORqEUTtVSum4L+FlekULs5LQwMGKtxyVicQ6Kt+Sgi2H/C4kXMge/njZquJIj03aFvAo= Received: by 10.54.54.41 with SMTP id c41mr55557wra; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:07:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:07:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:07:46 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: FreeBSD - Questions In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:07:48 -0000 On 7/26/05, Nikolas Britton wrote: > Do I always need to run 'make cleandepend' when rebuilding a kernel, > normally I build my kernels the old school way? >=20 > Is it just me or is -O2 now the default for kernel builds? What about > -Os, safe to use? >=20 > The kernel build failed when it tired to compile the r128drm device. >=20 > Is it safe to run the ULE scheduler instead of the 4BSD scheduler, ULE > is commented out in the default kernel? >=20 > Is the new ATA RAID stuff, metadata something, going to be backported > to 5.x? I'm trying setup a RAID 1 mirror with Intel ICH5R / Adaptec > HostRAID but it looks like it's not supported in 5.x >=20 > ---------- >=20 > Feel free to add more questions to this thread. >=20 One more thing... Will FreeBSD 5.4 kernel modules work under 6.x? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 20:08:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C9716A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:08:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7232F43D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:08:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2005 20:08:33 -0000 Received: from 147.94.76.83.cust.bluewin.ch (EHLO [192.168.1.11]) [83.76.94.147] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 26 Jul 2005 22:08:33 +0200 X-Authenticated: #912863 Message-ID: <42E69846.6050900@gmx.at> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:08:38 +0200 From: lars User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050722) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Problem with Opera Plug-ins X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:08:36 -0000 Hi all, I can't seem to get Opera to run the Realplayer plug-in on FreeBSD 5.4 Stable. I have open-motif-2.2.3_2 opera-8.01.20050615 linux-realplayer-10.0.5 installed. Following the instructions on: http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/audiohelp_nix.shtml In /usr/X11R6/share/opera/plugins I created following symlinks: % sudo ln -s /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-mozilla/plugins/nphelix.so nphelix.so % sudo ln -s /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-mozilla/plugins/nphelix.xpt nphelix.xpt So I have this: /usr/X11R6/share/opera/plugins% ls -la total 378 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jul 26 22:04 . drwxr-xr-x 11 root wheel 512 Jul 22 18:42 .. -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 82228 Jul 22 18:42 libnpp.so lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 47 Jul 26 22:04 nphelix.so -> /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-mozilla/plugins/nphelix.so lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 48 Jul 26 22:04 nphelix.xpt -> /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-mozilla/plugins/nphelix.xpt -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 87556 Jul 22 18:42 operamotifwrapper-1 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 87556 Jul 22 18:42 operamotifwrapper-2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 87556 Jul 22 18:42 operamotifwrapper-3 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 33056 Jul 22 18:42 operaplugincleaner unfortunately to no avail. Apparently the line "libXThrStub.so.6 => not found (0x0)" in % ldd /usr/X11R6/share/opera/plugins/operamotifwrapper-3 /usr/X11R6/share/opera/plugins/operamotifwrapper-3: libXm.so.3 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.so.3 (0x2808b000) libXt.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x282bc000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x2830a000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x28317000) libm.so.2 => /usr/lib/compat/libm.so.2 (0x283de000) libc.so.4 => /usr/lib/compat/libc.so.4 (0x283f9000) libXThrStub.so.6 => not found (0x0) libSM.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x28492000) libICE.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x2849b000) libXp.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXp.so.6 (0x284b3000) is the problem. Googling I found this message: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2005-March/001810.html "[...] I then did define BuildThreadStubLibrary in FreeBSD.cf and plugger/opera work (mostly). Ulrich Spörlein" Searching for FreeBSD.cf I get this: % locate FreeBSD.cf /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config/FreeBSD.cf /usr/ports/devel/imake-6/files/patch-FreeBSD.cf /usr/ports/net/tightvnc/files/patch-Xvnc::config::cf::FreeBSD.cf /usr/ports/net/vnc/files/FreeBSD.cf-patch /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries/files/patch-FreeBSD.cf /usr/ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-Server/files/patch-FreeBSD.cf /usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-server/files/patch-FreeBSD.cf /usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-server-snap/files/patch-FreeBSD.cf I'm a bit scared of messing up my system, so I'll ask first. Do I have to rebuild xorg or world or what do I have to do? Thanks in advance, lars. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 20:20:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABFB16A420 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:20:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu (server.t-hosting.hu [217.20.133.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B887643D58 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:20:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228A699793D; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:20:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.t-hosting.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 84536-03; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:20:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [80.98.156.20] (catv-50629c14.catv.broadband.hu [80.98.156.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE1599790E; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:20:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E69B11.6070208@t-hosting.hu> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:20:33 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nikolas Britton References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Cc: FreeBSD - Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:20:44 -0000 Nikolas Britton wrote: >Do I always need to run 'make cleandepend' when rebuilding a kernel, >normally I build my kernels the old school way? > > > I suspect it is only needed, when You want to rebuild Your custom kernel, but haven't deleted the /usr/src/sys/arch/compile/KERNCONF/ directory, so there is some old junk. >Is it just me or is -O2 now the default for kernel builds? What about >-Os, safe to use? > > > So is it for me. But if I specify some CFLAGS, for example -O3 -march=athlon64, the building fails, but CFLAGS mustn't affect the kernel compiling process afaik. There is COPTFLAGS for that reason. I've also made a PR about this new, unwanted behaviour, but haven't got any answers so yet. >The kernel build failed when it tired to compile the r128drm device. > >Is it safe to run the ULE scheduler instead of the 4BSD scheduler, ULE >is commented out in the default kernel? > > > It's nice for me. I had a general protection fault, but I can't prove, that ULE made that, I had similar with 4BSD. FreeBSD 6 is quite stable for me when I don't use my nve network interface that has a poor driver. >Is the new ATA RAID stuff, metadata something, going to be backported >to 5.x? I'm trying setup a RAID 1 mirror with Intel ICH5R / Adaptec >HostRAID but it looks like it's not supported in 5.x > >---------- > >Feel free to add more questions to this thread. >_______________________________________________ > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 20:33:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F95316A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:33:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C81F43D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:33:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i5so32009wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:33:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=H3vCdgr7u31sVxB/mk9bwaqAHuxe2ZyubnrZFZZSEwij2QitbDQQ9Gul0Bx3jPZiwnVrTBB8Y5J343Knwx1bsvdBCSj3MCBNic4z4KpBo8IEHcK+oGcmSR9HiPklBHnaIwX1iF/QYEzufc4fNDKK1ozN21xAMyd9aRiayfWCKrQ= Received: by 10.54.39.79 with SMTP id m79mr65737wrm; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:33:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:33:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:33:55 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: FreeBSD - Questions In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:33:56 -0000 On 7/26/05, Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 7/26/05, Nikolas Britton wrote: > > Do I always need to run 'make cleandepend' when rebuilding a kernel, > > normally I build my kernels the old school way? > > > > Is it just me or is -O2 now the default for kernel builds? What about > > -Os, safe to use? > > > > The kernel build failed when it tired to compile the r128drm device. > > > > Is it safe to run the ULE scheduler instead of the 4BSD scheduler, ULE > > is commented out in the default kernel? > > > > Is the new ATA RAID stuff, metadata something, going to be backported > > to 5.x? I'm trying setup a RAID 1 mirror with Intel ICH5R / Adaptec > > HostRAID but it looks like it's not supported in 5.x > > > > ---------- > > > > Feel free to add more questions to this thread. > > >=20 >=20 > One more thing... Will FreeBSD 5.4 kernel modules work under 6.x? >=20 Sorry! a few more things: At boot up I get these errors / warnings: "kenv: unable to get dumpdev" "no such user: _dhcp, falling back to "nobody"" I left groups and master.passwd files to deal with later in mergemaster and then I manually added the dhcp user to both of those files but the system still can't find him. "Starting default moused: moused: unable to open /dev/ums0: Device busy" I don't know whats up with that but my mouse does work. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 20:46:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC3D16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:46:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5F943D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:46:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 32761 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2005 20:46:40 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Jul 2005 20:46:40 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3C0F02A; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:46:39 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Nikolas Britton To: FreeBSD - Questions References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 26 Jul 2005 16:46:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <44ek9lnvm8.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 65 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD - Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:46:41 -0000 FreeBSD 6 (which hasn't been released yet, and will change a bit more before it is) is still very cutting edge. I would *strongly* recommend that you follow the -CURRENT mailing list if you're going to use it. Nikolas Britton writes: > On 7/26/05, Nikolas Britton wrote: > > On 7/26/05, Nikolas Britton wrote: > > > Do I always need to run 'make cleandepend' when rebuilding a kernel, > > > normally I build my kernels the old school way? > > > > > > Is it just me or is -O2 now the default for kernel builds? What about > > > -Os, safe to use? Yes, and not sure. > > > The kernel build failed when it tired to compile the r128drm device. With a default kernel? Try updating your sources again. > > > Is it safe to run the ULE scheduler instead of the 4BSD scheduler, ULE > > > is commented out in the default kernel? See the -CURRENT list archives. It's gotten fairly stable for a lot of people, and performs better in a number of cases, but it still causes trouble in some others. > > > Is the new ATA RAID stuff, metadata something, going to be backported > > > to 5.x? I'm trying setup a RAID 1 mirror with Intel ICH5R / Adaptec > > > HostRAID but it looks like it's not supported in 5.x Search for messages about that. SOS@ has discussed it quite a bit, if I recall correctly. > > One more thing... Will FreeBSD 5.4 kernel modules work under 6.x? No. > > Sorry! a few more things: > > At boot up I get these errors / warnings: > "kenv: unable to get dumpdev" Try setting dumpdev? > "no such user: _dhcp, falling back to "nobody"" > > I left groups and master.passwd files to deal with later in > mergemaster and then I manually added the dhcp user to both of those > files but the system still can't find him. You rebuilt the password database, right? You know you can't just open up the password file and edit it? > "Starting default moused: moused: unable to open /dev/ums0: Device busy" > > I don't know whats up with that but my mouse does work. And if you disable moused? -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 20:56:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C767C16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:56:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0C643D48 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:56:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 6196 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2005 20:56:38 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Jul 2005 20:56:38 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 6C55526; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:56:37 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: zick-1 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <1443095909.20050726152644@gmail.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 26 Jul 2005 16:56:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1443095909.20050726152644@gmail.com> Message-ID: <444qahnv5n.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 26 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Re: questions Xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:56:39 -0000 zick-1 writes: > Good day. > > Tell how to adjust the display with the help xorgcfg? > And in what file to keep changes? Loading X of system > To be made from/etc/X11/xorg.conf. But I cannot keep > change in this file when I leave from xorgcfg. > Xorgcfg -textmode does adjustments and writes > down them in/etc/X11/xorg.conf but these adjustments do > not approach. The system is not started in general or > with works with too small frequency of the screen. When > I start xorgcfg, I choose the display with help VESA 1024*768@84Hz > that all it becomes normal. To me to have each time to enter in X > with the help xorgcfg and anew to adjust necessary frequency of the screen. > How to make that these adjustments were at once after an > input in X? Look over the X server log. When you look at what parameters it loads, you may get a clue as to why it isn't using the parameters you expect. It may even be loading a different configuration file than you think. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 21:03:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0751D16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:03:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fun@thingy.apana.org.au) Received: from thingy.apana.org.au (thingy.apana.org.au [203.12.237.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9948843D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:03:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fun@thingy.apana.org.au) Received: by thingy.apana.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1014) id 5A212128243; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:17:50 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:17:50 +1000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050726001750.GJ9763@thingy.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: fun@thingy.apana.org.au (David Gerard) Subject: Restarting X server within KDE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:03:03 -0000 Many years ago, I ran fvwm2 under Solaris. It actually had a menu option set up whereby you could restart the X server without all your X clients dying. I really wanted this the other week when KDE went weird on me and the mouse pointer disappeared. (After only two months! With this sort of unreliability, open source will never be ready for Joe Consumer.) How does one restart the X server without it killing all the clients? - d. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 21:10:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1805316A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:10:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail25.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail25.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C031143D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:10:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 29491 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2005 21:10:46 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail25.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Jul 2005 21:10:46 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id F366426; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:10:44 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Mike Friedman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050726103124.S67832@malcolm.berkeley.edu> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 26 Jul 2005 17:10:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050726103124.S67832@malcolm.berkeley.edu> Message-ID: <44zms9mfxn.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 25 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Re: fastcgi port fixed but not updated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:10:47 -0000 Mike Friedman writes: > I've recently discovered a problem report for the mod_fastcgi (2.4.2) > port: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/79774. The > report seems to indicate that the port was fixed shortly after the PR > was sent (May 31), yet I just did a cvsup and the buggy port still > shows up. > > I have made the fix to my copy of the port and it does work, but why > isn't the fixed version available via cvsup? My cvsup log (run just > this morning) shows that the fastcgi Makefile was checked out, yet its > date is still early on May 31, apparently just before the fix was > done, according to the PR. > > Anyone know what might be going on? Since the fastcgi port is called > by the rt-3.4.2 port (which is my real interest), keeping my fixed > version of the former around under a different name is not really a > good option, in case I need to update RT. The bug report claims that the install fails. It works fine for me with the Apache 1.3 port, so I suspect that a more sophisticated fix would be needed; if the path were hardcoded as you suggest, the port would *only* work with Apache2. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 21:13:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50C016A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:13:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from mail.digitalfreaks.org (arbitor.digitalfreaks.org [216.151.95.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037AA43D58 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:13:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix, from userid 1022) id 2437831981B; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:13:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2172731F406 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:13:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:13:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brian A. Seklecki" X-X-Sender: lavalamp@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050725164602.B31613@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> Message-ID: <20050726104633.S69040@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> References: <20050725164602.B31613@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: Dell Powervault 120T / ADIC FastStor DLT D116 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:13:21 -0000 On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > For some reason, the tape changer is probing as pass(4) instead of ch(4). > > > Any ideas why? SCSI devices have a "device class" designation, IIRC. Nevermind, someone had removed "device ch" from the kernel config (as well as uk(4), which explains pass(4) attachment) ch1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 ch1: Removable Changer SCSI-2 device ch1: 3.300MB/s transfers ch1: 7 slots, 1 drive, 1 picker, 0 portals sa0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 sa0: Removable Sequential Access SCSI-2 device sa0: 20.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 8, 16bit) # amtapetype -f /dev/sa0 Writing 256 Mbyte compresseable data: 25 sec Writing 256 Mbyte uncompresseable data: 207 sec WARNING: Tape drive has hardware compression enabled Estimated time to write 2 * 1024 Mbyte: 1656 sec = 0 h 27 min wrote 454530 32Kb blocks in 1390 files in 13494 seconds (short write) [interrupt] ...more complete output amtapetype(1) to amanda-users@amanda.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 21:15:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1336916A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:15:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drue@therub.org) Received: from cenn.mc.mpls.visi.com (cenn.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C1843D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:15:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drue@therub.org) Received: from egypt.therub.org (therub.org [209.98.146.43]) by cenn.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448B08106 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:15:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: by egypt.therub.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 05BB5456577; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:15:17 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:15:16 -0500 From: Dan Rue To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050726211516.GF95651@therub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: jail login and replication problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:15:18 -0000 Greetings, I am setting up multiple jails on a machine. The first jail, everything works fine. If I add a user, that user can log in. If I tar cvzpf the jail, tar xvzpf to create a new one, some people can log into the new jail, and some can not. The user that can log in to the new one was the first user created (me), but any subsequent users can not log into new jails.. The symptom is right after accepting the password via ssh, the connection will just get dropped. I could not find any good error messages using ssh.. But if I enable telnet and try to telnet in, I receive this error in /var/log/messages: Jul 26 16:11:46 jail3 login: _secure_path: cannot stat /home/user3/.login_conf: Permission denied Jul 26 16:11:46 jail3 login: _secure_path: cannot stat /etc/login.conf: Permission denied Jul 26 16:11:46 jail3 login: _secure_path: cannot stat /home/user3/.login_conf: Permission denied Jul 26 16:11:46 jail3 login: _secure_path: cannot stat /etc/login.conf: Permission denied The permissions on those files are fine. So what would cause that error in jails that have been replicated using tar, but only to some users? I'm stumped.. Here's my rc.conf exerpt: jail_enable="YES" jail_list="jail3" jail_socket_unixiproute_only="NO" jail_sysvipc_allow="YES" # allow shared mem on all jails jail_jail3_rootdir="/jails/jail3" jail_jail3_hostname="jail3.example.com" jail_jail3_ip="10.0.0.203" jail_jail3_procfs_enable="YES" jail_jail3_devfs_enable="YES" jail_jail3_devfs_ruleset="devfsrules_jail" tia, Dan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 21:16:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA0A16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:16:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F57F43D53 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:16:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j6QLG9oE081771; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:16:09 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:16:09 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: David Gerard Message-ID: <20050726211608.GA57412@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20050726001750.GJ9763@thingy.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050726001750.GJ9763@thingy.apana.org.au> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Restarting X server within KDE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:16:12 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 26), David Gerard said: > Many years ago, I ran fvwm2 under Solaris. It actually had a menu > option set up whereby you could restart the X server without all your > X clients dying. > > I really wanted this the other week when KDE went weird on me and the > mouse pointer disappeared. (After only two months! With this sort of > unreliability, open source will never be ready for Joe Consumer.) > > How does one restart the X server without it killing all the clients? That's not possible. More likely is that your fvwm2 menu option simply restarted fvwm2 itself. Many window managers have this option plus a couple other "launch twm/blackbox/olwm" etc entries to shuffle between different window managers. Depending on how you launched KDE, you might be able to just kill it and restart it. If you exec it at the bottom of your .xinitrc though, you would have to have kde reexec itself (since exiting kde would also exit X). I don't know if kde has that option, though. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 21:18:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C8316A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:18:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9BD043D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:18:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.246.232] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A88E3A6F00AA; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:18:06 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6QLIrur027653; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:18:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6QLIjIx027652; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:18:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: References: From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:18:45 -0700 In-Reply-To: (scuba@centroin.com.br's message of "Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:45:56 -0300 (EST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hardware monitor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:18:12 -0000 writes: > |device ichsmb > | > | > |I get this error messages: > | > |In file included from /usr/src/sys/dev/ichsmb/ichsmb.c:64: > |/usr/src/sys/dev/ichsmb/ichsmb_var.h:44:22: smbus_if.h: No such file or Looks like you forgot to read the ichsmb manpage or the conf/NOTES file which says you need certain other device entries too. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 21:26:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D30016A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:26:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eric@pretorious.net) Received: from mail.leaguehost.net (node-423a611b.sjc.onnet.us.uu.net [66.58.97.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D135C43D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:26:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eric@pretorious.net) Received: from [192.168.1.115] (adsl-69-227-121-18.dsl.scrm01.pacbell.net [69.227.121.18]) by mail.leaguehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15BC0BF64 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:37:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Eric Pretorious To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200507261219.08111.eric@pretorious.net> In-Reply-To: <200507261219.08111.eric@pretorious.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:01:31 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200507261401.31860.eric@pretorious.net> Subject: Re: ipfw: deny traffic between interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: eric@pretorious.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:26:36 -0000 On Tuesday 26 July 2005 12:19 pm, Eric Pretorious wrote: >I'm using FreeBSD 4.10 as a masquerading firewall for three private networks >and want to restrict traffic between each interface (kind of like VLAN's). FWIW: This construct *seems* to have the effect that I desire: ipfw add 500 deny all from any to any out recv rl0 xmit fxp0 ipfw add 501 deny all from any to any out recv rl0 xmit sis1 ipfw add 502 deny all from any to any out recv fxp0 xmit rl0 ipfw add 503 deny all from any to any out recv fxp0 xmit sis1 ipfw add 504 deny all from any to any out recv sis1 xmit rl0 ipfw add 505 deny all from any to any out recv sis1 xmit fxp0 I'm not 100% certain of incoming/outgoing packets and the receive & transmit "interfaces", though. (The man page doesn't elaborate on this rule option.) -- Eric P., Truckee, CA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 21:34:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1949C16A420 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:34:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7879A43D4C for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:34:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin02-en2 [10.13.10.147]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout10/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id j6QLYksr004065; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:34:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.1.209] (nfw2.codefab.com [199.103.21.225] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin02/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id j6QLYii4027433; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:34:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <1F5BBAF8-3333-47E0-A737-B7012E49C422@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:34:49 -0400 To: fci X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: samba / hard drive issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:34:47 -0000 On Jul 26, 2005, at 3:50 PM, fci wrote: > now I get this error about every 10mins: > inetd[473]: netbios-ns/udp: bind: Address already in use > inetd[473]: netbios-ssn/tcp: bind: Address already in use If you are starting smbd/nmbd via the rc.d mechanism, you should not turn them on in inetd as well. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 21:34:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21CA016A420 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:34:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikef@ack.Berkeley.EDU) Received: from malcolm.berkeley.edu (malcolm.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.206.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D6D43D58 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:34:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikef@ack.Berkeley.EDU) Received: from malcolm.berkeley.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by malcolm.berkeley.edu (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6QLYvb7080709 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:34:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mikef@ack.Berkeley.EDU) Received: from localhost (mikef@localhost) by malcolm.berkeley.edu (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) with ESMTP id j6QLYvld080706 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:34:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mikef@ack.Berkeley.EDU) X-Authentication-Warning: malcolm.berkeley.edu: mikef owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:34:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Friedman X-X-Sender: mikef@malcolm.berkeley.edu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <44zms9mfxn.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Message-ID: <20050726142005.V67832@malcolm.berkeley.edu> References: <20050726103124.S67832@malcolm.berkeley.edu> <44zms9mfxn.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (malcolm.berkeley.edu [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:34:57 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: fastcgi port fixed but not updated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:34:58 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 at 17:10 (-0400), Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Mike Friedman writes: > >> I've recently discovered a problem report for the mod_fastcgi (2.4.2) >> port: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/79774. The >> report seems to indicate that the port was fixed shortly after the PR >> was sent (May 31), yet I just did a cvsup and the buggy port still >> shows up. >> >> ... >> >> Anyone know what might be going on? Since the fastcgi port is called >> by the rt-3.4.2 port (which is my real interest), keeping my fixed >> version of the former around under a different name is not really a >> good option, in case I need to update RT. > > The bug report claims that the install fails. It works fine for me with > the Apache 1.3 port, so I suspect that a more sophisticated fix would be > needed; if the path were hard-coded as you suggest, the port would *only* > work with Apache2. Lowell, I can see your point about the content of the fix. But the bug report does say the following (in the Audit-Trail): Port has been updated since this PR has been sent. It seems to install flawlessly. As you say, the one line fix (in 'do-install') would not seem consistent with your experience installing fastcgi with Apache 1.3, where you don't have the problem. (I'm installing RT with fastcgi and Apache 2). Just looking at the Makefile didn't reveal to me that the fix proposed in the bug report wouldn't be appropriate for Apache 1.3. But my question was motivated by the apparent contradiction between the above-quoted statement in the report and the fact that the port wasn't actually updated (perhaps for the reason you give). Meanwhile, I'm left with a mod_fastcgi port that will not install, as delivered, with Apache 2. Yet the RT port depends on the fastcgi port. Mike _____________________________________________________________________ Mike Friedman System and Network Security mikef@ack.Berkeley.EDU 2484 Shattuck Avenue 1-510-642-1410 University of California at Berkeley http://ack.Berkeley.EDU/~mikef http://security.berkeley.edu _____________________________________________________________________ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQA+AwUBQuasfa0bf1iNr4mCEQLGJACfSTNExlIQ8CYvOMjMq4+dcF9VX/oAmM1U DcXvyBq9fcHeu83KKuEIDlc= =43Zi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 21:40:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D036516A420 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:40:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ross@axe.homelinux.net) Received: from smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3817E43D49 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:40:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ross@axe.homelinux.net) Received: from lucy.axe.homelinux.net ([82.36.124.90]) by smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:40:56 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.3] (purplehaze [192.168.0.3]) by lucy.axe.homelinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38EAC1475F; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:40:10 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <42E6ADB7.8070803@axe.homelinux.net> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:40:07 +0100 From: Ross Kendall Axe User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glenn Dawson References: <20050726054510.827491D93C@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050726002209.1aa02a40@cobalt.antimatter.net> In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20050726002209.1aa02a40@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 OpenPGP: url=http://www.rossaxe.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/.pgpkey Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2005 21:40:56.0280 (UTC) FILETIME=[B4661D80:01C5922A] Cc: Xu Qiang , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: undelete in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:40:12 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Glenn Dawson wrote: > At 10:48 PM 7/25/2005, Xu Qiang wrote: > >> Ross Kendall Axe wrote: >> > Yes. MS-Windows doesn't have anything Unix doesn't in this regard. I >> > take it you're not familiar with the DOS/Windows 'del' command... >> >> Hehe, this is a good analog I didn't think of. :) >> >> > If he's worried about accidentally deleting files, he should use KDE >> > or Gnome. They both have a trash can/wastebasket/recycle bin. >> >> Now I just have X Window in my machine. Not as good-looking as Gnome >> desktop. >> Can I install gnome without using ports? I want to install everything >> manually. > > > Are you a glutton for punishment? > > You can install it manually, I did it once...never again. > > Seriously though, there are so many dependencies that it takes forever > to get everything set up manually. With ports you just do a make > install clean and come back in a few hours (or days depending on how > fast your machine is) Yes, indeed. I've never tried it myself, but the fact that it's been dropped from Slackware Linux for exactly this reason would seem to suggest that this is *not* an exercise for the faint hearted. Ross > -Glenn > > >> thanks, >> >> Regards, >> Xu Qiang -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC5q239bR4xmappRARAouvAKDctUkF4wkn9L6bm/GeB99arjuEmQCgoEoZ qzqjmPM9uodBwBxUuTSC64o= =OQGq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 22:00:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E8416A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:00:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-html@jonathan-glaschke.de) Received: from mail.liberty-hosting.de (mail.liberty-hosting.de [195.225.132.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CEC43D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:00:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-html@jonathan-glaschke.de) Received: from mail.liberty-hosting.de ([195.225.132.203]) by localhost (liberty-mail [195.225.132.203]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93149-05 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:59:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jogla.fbsd (p50894C2B.dip.t-dialin.net [80.137.76.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.liberty-hosting.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880DF15896A for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:59:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jogla.fbsd (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jogla.fbsd (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6QNxlne000647 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:59:48 GMT (envelope-from jonathan@jogla.fbsd) Received: (from jonathan@localhost) by jogla.fbsd (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6QNxluM000646 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:59:47 GMT (envelope-from jonathan) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:59:47 +0000 From: Jonathan Glaschke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050726235947.GA573@jogla.fbsd> References: <42E69846.6050900@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <42E69846.6050900@gmx.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.liberty-hosting.de Subject: Re: Problem with Opera Plug-ins X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:00:09 -0000 On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:08:38PM +0200, lars wrote: > Hi all, > > I can't seem to get Opera to run the Realplayer plug-in on FreeBSD 5.4 > Stable. > > I have > > open-motif-2.2.3_2 > opera-8.01.20050615 > linux-realplayer-10.0.5 > > installed. > > > Following the instructions on: > http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/audiohelp_nix.shtml > > In /usr/X11R6/share/opera/plugins I created following symlinks: > > % sudo ln -s /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-mozilla/plugins/nphelix.so nphelix.so > % sudo ln -s /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-mozilla/plugins/nphelix.xpt nphelix.xpt > > So I have this: > > /usr/X11R6/share/opera/plugins% ls -la > > total 378 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jul 26 22:04 . > drwxr-xr-x 11 root wheel 512 Jul 22 18:42 .. > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 82228 Jul 22 18:42 libnpp.so > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 47 Jul 26 22:04 nphelix.so -> > /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-mozilla/plugins/nphelix.so > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 48 Jul 26 22:04 nphelix.xpt -> > /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-mozilla/plugins/nphelix.xpt > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 87556 Jul 22 18:42 operamotifwrapper-1 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 87556 Jul 22 18:42 operamotifwrapper-2 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 87556 Jul 22 18:42 operamotifwrapper-3 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 33056 Jul 22 18:42 operaplugincleaner > > unfortunately to no avail. > > > > > Apparently the line "libXThrStub.so.6 => not found (0x0)" in > > % ldd /usr/X11R6/share/opera/plugins/operamotifwrapper-3 > /usr/X11R6/share/opera/plugins/operamotifwrapper-3: > libXm.so.3 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.so.3 (0x2808b000) > libXt.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x282bc000) > libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x2830a000) > libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x28317000) > libm.so.2 => /usr/lib/compat/libm.so.2 (0x283de000) > libc.so.4 => /usr/lib/compat/libc.so.4 (0x283f9000) > libXThrStub.so.6 => not found (0x0) > libSM.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x28492000) > libICE.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x2849b000) > libXp.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXp.so.6 (0x284b3000) > > is the problem. > > > > > Googling I found this message: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2005-March/001810.html > > "[...] > > I then did define BuildThreadStubLibrary in FreeBSD.cf and plugger/opera > work (mostly). > > Ulrich Spörlein" > > > > Searching for FreeBSD.cf I get this: > > % locate FreeBSD.cf > /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config/FreeBSD.cf > /usr/ports/devel/imake-6/files/patch-FreeBSD.cf > /usr/ports/net/tightvnc/files/patch-Xvnc::config::cf::FreeBSD.cf > /usr/ports/net/vnc/files/FreeBSD.cf-patch > /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries/files/patch-FreeBSD.cf > /usr/ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-Server/files/patch-FreeBSD.cf > /usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-server/files/patch-FreeBSD.cf > /usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-server-snap/files/patch-FreeBSD.cf > > I'm a bit scared of messing up my system, so I'll ask first. > Do I have to rebuild xorg or world or what do I have to do? > > Thanks in advance, > lars. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I think you need "linux-opera" because this is a linux plugin. -Jonathan -- | /"\ ASCII Ribbon | Jonathan Glaschke - Lorenz-Görtz-Straße 71, | \ / Campaign Against | 41238 Mönchengladbach, Tel: 02166-265876 | X HTML In Mail | Mobil: 0162-3390789, ICQ: 231021883 | / \ And News | http://jonathan-glaschke.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 22:20:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC2416A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:20:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E1043D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:20:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6QMKOa5064368 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:20:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id j6QMKOMM064365 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:20:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:20:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050727001937.U63965@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: MAXPHYS and MAXBSIZE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:20:33 -0000 what is the difference between this 2 compile time defines? is it possible to set it up higher? (something like 0.5MB for modern disks make sense) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 22:31:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C0D16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:31:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kl@os.lv) Received: from trollis.latnet.lv (trollis.latnet.lv [159.148.1.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCD143D4C for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:31:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kl@os.lv) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by trollis.latnet.lv (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056461D36D5 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:31:21 +0300 (EEST) Received: from trollis.latnet.lv ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (trollis.latnet.lv [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16985-04 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:31:20 +0300 (EEST) Received: from os.lv (unknown [159.148.155.3]) by trollis.latnet.lv (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DA6D1D3687 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:31:20 +0300 (EEST) Received: from 80.70.26.44 ([80.70.26.44]) by os.lv (WinRoute Pro 4.1) with SMTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:34:20 +0300 Message-ID: <42E6B9B8.4060401@os.lv> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:31:20 +0300 From: Casper User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050720) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <42E64D9E.5080106@os.lv> In-Reply-To: <42E64D9E.5080106@os.lv> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.2.1 (20041222) at latnet.lv Subject: Re: jail networking X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:31:25 -0000 I played little more: jail# ping www.google.lv PING www.l.google.com (216.239.59.104): 56 data bytes ^C --- www.l.google.com ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss jail# ping 216.239.59.104 PING 216.239.59.104 (216.239.59.104): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 216.239.59.104: icmp_seq=0 ttl=245 time=64.629 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.59.104: icmp_seq=1 ttl=245 time=63.744 ms ^C --- 216.239.59.104 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss With host ping not working, and seems that dns is working ok, becouse it resolving ip and with ip network working... :) Anybody can say what is the problem? :) Casper Casper wrote: > > Hi, > > I have problem with setuping network to jail... > I have #uname -a > FreeBSD gam.zuze.lv 5.4-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD Wed Jul 20 19:52:44 EEST 2005 > and installed jail on it... > sysctl: > net.inet.ip.forwarding: 1 > security.jail.set_hostname_allowed: 1 > security.jail.socket_unixiproute_only: 1 > security.jail.sysvipc_allowed: 0 > security.jail.getfsstatroot_only: 1 > security.jail.allow_raw_sockets: 1 > security.jail.chflags_allowed: 0 > security.jail.jailed: 0 > > from host ping: > # ping www.google.lv > PING www.l.google.com (216.239.59.104): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 216.239.59.104: icmp_seq=0 ttl=245 time=64.608 ms > 64 bytes from 216.239.59.104: icmp_seq=1 ttl=245 time=65.198 ms > 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss > > from jail: > jail# ping www.google.lv > PING www.l.google.com (216.239.59.99): 56 data bytes > ^C > --- www.l.google.com ping statistics --- > 3 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss > > but traceroute from jail show every second packet: > 4 latnet.to.lattelekom.lv (195.13.173.221) 4.324 ms * 4.810 ms > 5 * so-4-0-0-war1.lnt.cw.net (166.63.222.101) 54.223 ms * > 6 so-7-0-0-zcr2.lnt.cw.net (166.63.222.42) 72.205 ms * 54.778 ms > 7 * 195.66.226.125 (195.66.226.125) 90.496 ms * > 8 216.239.46.173 (216.239.46.173) 54.711 ms * 54.204 ms > 9 * 216.239.49.254 (216.239.49.254) 64.939 ms * > 10 216.239.49.121 (216.239.49.121) 67.530 ms * 216.239.49.114 > (216.239.49.114) 68.128 ms > 11 * 216.239.59.103 (216.239.59.103) 64.615 ms * > > From jail I can ping router and local network ips... > > My pf.conf: > ext_if="rl0" > int_if="rl1" > internal_net="172.22.1.0/24" > external_addr="xx.xx.xx.xx" > table { 10.0.0.0/8, 127.0.0.0/8, 172.22.0.0/24, 192.168.0.0/24 } > set loginterface $ext_if > set block-policy return > scrub in all > nat on $ext_if from $internal_net to any -> ($ext_if) > pass in all > pass out all > pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $ext_if port 22 keep state > pass out on $ext_if proto { tcp, udp } all keep state > pass in on $ext_if proto { tcp, udp } from any to port 80 keep state > pass out on $ext_if from 192.168.0.0/24 to any keep state queue developers > pass out on $ext_if from 192.168.1.0/24 to any keep state queue marketing > > > There is some manual about jail networking? > I don`t understand why not working jail network if I can ping router > from jail, routes ok and traceroute strange packets... > > tnx, > > Casper > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 22:32:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C5B16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:32:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: from neptune.atopia.net (neptune.atopia.net [209.128.231.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E63C43D58 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:32:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: by neptune.atopia.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 53CA76187; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:32:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by neptune.atopia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F68E6186 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:32:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:32:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Juszczak To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050726183029.M97284@neptune.atopia.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: cat /dev/urandom X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:32:34 -0000 Hi all, Quick question. shell# cat /dev/urandom can that executed as root cause any harm to the system? What if a random sequence of `rm *` was generated... would it be executed? I tried that to fix my terminal and forgot it might cause damage as root, even if its just being cat'd to the screen. I thought I saw some files fly by which would indicate an execution of `ls`.... Just curious.... Thanks, Matt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 22:35:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7120D16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:35:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mtbeedee@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676C243D53 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:35:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mtbeedee@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so47781wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:35:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nxHeJxhziIwl+TLCEUl79GvToYQSx1aat0uFa6D8TZzvwWoQ5Hdhc7dcwKl8Edr5Sh5R+TXWy9a92xjEQHrkKHf2AmRJcyhdZQNKZZv25zChd4tt5HJvDZwFAbtzLgw6Md5vA3wc6/U75ApK36FSTlZY0DJCqSaOi9TBwKoNQfc= Received: by 10.54.2.57 with SMTP id 57mr92957wrb; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:35:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.159.14 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:35:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:35:33 -0400 From: Michael Beattie To: Matt Juszczak In-Reply-To: <20050726183029.M97284@neptune.atopia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050726183029.M97284@neptune.atopia.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cat /dev/urandom X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michael Beattie List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:35:35 -0000 On 7/26/05, Matt Juszczak wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > Quick question. >=20 > shell# cat /dev/urandom >=20 > can that executed as root cause any harm to the system? What if a random > sequence of `rm *` was generated... would it be executed? >=20 > I tried that to fix my terminal and forgot it might cause damage as root, > even if its just being cat'd to the screen. I thought I saw some files > fly by which would indicate an execution of `ls`.... >=20 > Just curious.... >=20 If you had a file with an rm * in it and you cat'd it would it execute? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 22:37:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED6C16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:37:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ben@bjencks.net) Received: from bjencks.net (sub20-225.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.20.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C072243D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:37:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ben@bjencks.net) Received: (qmail 7533 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2005 22:37:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO wagner.bjencks.net) (10.11.55.30) by bjencks.net with SMTP; 26 Jul 2005 22:37:42 -0000 Received: (from brj@localhost) by wagner.bjencks.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6QMbfOZ001599; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:37:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ben@bjencks.net) X-Authentication-Warning: wagner.bjencks.net: brj set sender to ben@bjencks.net using -f To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ben Jencks Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:37:20 -0700 Message-ID: <86iryxgpnj.fsf@wagner.bjencks.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Start wpa_supplicant on boot without dhclient X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:37:44 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It looks like wpa_supplicant is the "right way" to configure wireless as of FreeBSD 6. I'd like to start it on boot. However, I can't figure out how to start it without dhclient also running on boot. Since I don't always boot near an AP, this isn't appropriate. If I use network_interfaces="lo0 ath0" ifconfig_ath0="WPA DHCP" then it starts wpa_supplicant, and immediately starts dhclient as well. If I take out DHCP network_interfaces="lo0 ath0" ifconfig_ath0="WPA" then wpa_supplicant doesn't start dhclient when it gets a connection I can get something close to the right behavior by setting network_interfaces="lo0" ifconfig_ath0="WPA DHCP" This way, wpa_supplicant doesn't start on boot, but I can start it after boot with /etc/rc.d/wpa_supplicant start ath0 and get the right behavior. Is there a way to get wpa_supplicant to start on boot, and only start dhclient as a result of the link-state event, not directly during boot? - -- Ben -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC5rs1pt3yYclAKVsRAsTWAJ9VhP9RtwXd3a0q1TPePr66rpEwxgCeIeZ7 JXOqziWjhb9ldWGHgok1N7o= =+2gW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 23:00:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1520916A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:00:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A127943D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:00:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1DxYP7-0001g6-Sf for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:00:05 -0400 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6QN7Oii036492 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:07:24 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j6QN7N7V036491 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:07:23 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:07:22 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20050726183029.M97284@neptune.atopia.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507261807.23024.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec7912acb352ec6b0471120b29fc24640b34350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: cat /dev/urandom X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:00:07 -0000 On Tuesday 26 July 2005 17:35, Michael Beattie wrote: > On 7/26/05, Matt Juszczak wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Quick question. > > > > shell# cat /dev/urandom > > > > can that executed as root cause any harm to the system? What if a random > > sequence of `rm *` was generated... would it be executed? > > > > I tried that to fix my terminal and forgot it might cause damage as root, > > even if its just being cat'd to the screen. I thought I saw some files > > fly by which would indicate an execution of `ls`.... > > > > Just curious.... > > If you had a file with an rm * in it and you cat'd it would it execute? > _______________________________________________ That's a good answer, but what if the command was: `cat /dev/urandom` could /dev/urandom generate arbitrary and potentially executable code? I'm curious, too lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 23:00:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7BA316A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:00:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7303643D4C for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:00:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so50773wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:00:23 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=EhR36KTvU8OvtQeFstEpRE2qPPYjjFBWyMCHJ2MR/qEkzLdSuieMTd+PoXky+QSO85VapRobPVpD+Mxt4fG8Y3M4h228pagN2cbKaIduISKWlaVMBOhUV80lTUBGrNdQlwE+ukvMoiHYHO5FL/csuJU9dTgSdszqt3BH39Vjy4w= Received: by 10.54.56.5 with SMTP id e5mr101892wra; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:00:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.61.2 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:00:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:00:22 +0400 From: "Andrew P." To: questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: 100Mbit network performance - again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Andrew P." List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:00:25 -0000 Hello all! I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95 workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cable. I am now able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between all kinds of Windows 2000/XP machines with all kinds of cheapest 100Mbit ethernet hardware. But I have never ever exceeded 8-9Mbytes/s between a Windows machine and a FreeBSD box - _never_. Be it Samba, different ftp/http servers, different FreeBSD versions (4.x/5.x), with ipfw enabled or disabled, etc., - the speed always hovers around 7-8Mb/s. I know it's not critical, I know I should've upgraded to Gigabit hardware long ago, but is there something wrong? I tried different linux distros, but they all seem to be even slower. Wazzu= p?.. Thanks, Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 23:09:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF2A16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:09:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean.hafeez@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14EC43D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:09:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean.hafeez@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so49368nzo for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:09:29 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:to:x-mailer:from; b=VAWc6Gc9EZeCTlBGhiVMUVKkev8sSXvSmF4qUO7y1yUKQIKqhpKn/GpjsgHmAPoEkW0iUepokS4l/7iVqZwOTw8mzZhNtRNWe+p/+IdFJQLs4RoBZ31UUCs9KRswEmbE2jz2WJCEUSW9iuKtPe5qOcmS/QZl7CNgN13/5apDsAU= Received: by 10.37.12.49 with SMTP id p49mr272574nzi; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:09:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.105? ([67.109.14.227]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 7sm333567nzn.2005.07.26.16.09.28; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:09:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <491A44A6-1409-4D9E-AEFD-2B8665D52BA7@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:09:23 -0700 To: "Andrew P." X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) From: Sean Hafeez Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:09:30 -0000 I get 60+Mbytes between my FreeBSD 5.4 and Mac via NFS. I get 40-60Mbytes between my FreeBSD 5.4 and Windows 2K box via Samba. Good NICs help. Intel 10/100 Pro. Google for Samba tuning also. -Sean On Jul 26, 2005, at 4:00 PM, Andrew P. wrote: > Hello all! > > I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95 > workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cable. > I am now able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between all kinds of Windows > 2000/XP machines with all kinds of cheapest 100Mbit ethernet hardware. > > But I have never ever exceeded 8-9Mbytes/s between a Windows machine > and a FreeBSD box - _never_. Be it Samba, different ftp/http servers, > different FreeBSD versions (4.x/5.x), with ipfw enabled or disabled, > etc., - the speed always hovers around 7-8Mb/s. I know it's not > critical, I know I should've upgraded to Gigabit hardware long ago, > but is there something wrong? > > I tried different linux distros, but they all seem to be even > slower. Wazzup?.. > > Thanks, > Andrew P. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 23:13:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B770716A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:13:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09AC543D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:13:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i12so47519wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:13:50 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=grePEepW15Lqrsk96Z2uA1GPN1WdGAJAmwbgPwyHoBuQhyfIJZaOOYp5OixOrexHPsQy5iWCHXXwjA0EmYz9mnMJc8+9HmUyGg3pSx1mnS/HONTqUbwK7QDmt7ysn6/HfIMuyeN87XLnyoNQie+BLC7PpPEUaTJUsUxbOoOv0Ps= Received: by 10.54.43.11 with SMTP id q11mr117409wrq; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:13:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.61.2 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:13:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:13:50 +0400 From: "Andrew P." To: Sean Hafeez In-Reply-To: <491A44A6-1409-4D9E-AEFD-2B8665D52BA7@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <491A44A6-1409-4D9E-AEFD-2B8665D52BA7@gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Andrew P." List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:13:51 -0000 Erm, well 60+Mbytes is no wonder in a Gigabit environment (and it is too much of a wonder in a FastEthernet one), but I'm interested in getting 100Mbit hardware to work at full speed. Thanks for your 2 cents anyway, Andrew P. On 7/27/05, Sean Hafeez wrote: > I get 60+Mbytes between my FreeBSD 5.4 and Mac via NFS. I get > 40-60Mbytes between my FreeBSD 5.4 and Windows 2K box via Samba. Good > NICs help. Intel 10/100 Pro. >=20 > Google for Samba tuning also. >=20 > -Sean >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Jul 26, 2005, at 4:00 PM, Andrew P. wrote: >=20 > > Hello all! > > > > I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95 > > workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cable. > > I am now able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between all kinds of Windows > > 2000/XP machines with all kinds of cheapest 100Mbit ethernet hardware. > > > > But I have never ever exceeded 8-9Mbytes/s between a Windows machine > > and a FreeBSD box - _never_. Be it Samba, different ftp/http servers, > > different FreeBSD versions (4.x/5.x), with ipfw enabled or disabled, > > etc., - the speed always hovers around 7-8Mb/s. I know it's not > > critical, I know I should've upgraded to Gigabit hardware long ago, > > but is there something wrong? > > > > I tried different linux distros, but they all seem to be even > > slower. Wazzup?.. > > > > Thanks, > > Andrew P. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >=20 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 23:18:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69BE616A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:18:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mtbeedee@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F066843D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:18:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mtbeedee@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so52864wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:18:46 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZtC7Ly1pmMSPnkQTSijEpN6VrXxENx4DnApp7oFdKCPqk4LXTnKQZf8ctawRFL00Bn/RU3WDxGqBiSzSOwhS0rSPnD0+O7uAUAYIF7vIxOqK4wD9TFmjOvAPfibXx0JCVLaxjwgDvbiiItWiHSpfHatSJXW6r47Oq2Lgw/vC8pE= Received: by 10.54.8.60 with SMTP id 60mr99587wrh; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:18:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.159.14 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:18:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:18:46 -0400 From: Michael Beattie To: Lane In-Reply-To: <200507261807.23024.lane@joeandlane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050726183029.M97284@neptune.atopia.net> <200507261807.23024.lane@joeandlane.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cat /dev/urandom X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michael Beattie List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:18:47 -0000 `cat /dev/urandom` will do just that... it's not also going to run code from within that output. On 7/26/05, Lane wrote: > On Tuesday 26 July 2005 17:35, Michael Beattie wrote: > > On 7/26/05, Matt Juszczak wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Quick question. > > > > > > shell# cat /dev/urandom > > > > > > can that executed as root cause any harm to the system? What if a ra= ndom > > > sequence of `rm *` was generated... would it be executed? > > > > > > I tried that to fix my terminal and forgot it might cause damage as r= oot, > > > even if its just being cat'd to the screen. I thought I saw some fil= es > > > fly by which would indicate an execution of `ls`.... > > > > > > Just curious.... > > > > If you had a file with an rm * in it and you cat'd it would it execute? > > _______________________________________________ > That's a good answer, but what if the command was: >=20 > `cat /dev/urandom` >=20 > could /dev/urandom generate arbitrary and potentially executable code? >=20 > I'm curious, too >=20 > lane > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 23:23:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0D316A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:23:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean.hafeez@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0611843D55 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:23:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean.hafeez@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z6so33620nzd for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:23:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=Xll0iHy2Q/y3w5vhOvab4vTXLKQL6myRELrFCnzwtaMuWbJpoT1E2rjXE8MZja5bcDIC63+UQZk03D3KzJpqEVdmYnAQpukwTk9T9c0L5gDIypZl367IyTVi4sS11DMxmEF9pdZzQYog41S9Fo4mdLHvpNlmuhKY8h23GwwAPLg= Received: by 10.36.88.13 with SMTP id l13mr258896nzb; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:23:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.105? ([67.109.14.227]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 15sm345660nzo.2005.07.26.16.23.33; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:23:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <491A44A6-1409-4D9E-AEFD-2B8665D52BA7@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <38AD37A2-3097-4209-BFF6-090B921BC131@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sean Hafeez Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:23:29 -0700 To: "Andrew P." X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:23:37 -0000 Let me fix my typo here..... I get 60+Mbits out of 100Mbits on a 10/100 network. The Max SUSTAINED thru-put you will ever see will be around 70Mbits. There is an overhead that means that you will only see .7 of the theoretical. -Sean On Jul 26, 2005, at 4:13 PM, Andrew P. wrote: > Erm, well 60+Mbytes is no wonder in a Gigabit environment (and it is > too much of a wonder in a FastEthernet one), but I'm interested in > getting 100Mbit hardware to work at full speed. > > Thanks for your 2 cents anyway, > Andrew P. > > On 7/27/05, Sean Hafeez wrote: > >> I get 60+Mbytes between my FreeBSD 5.4 and Mac via NFS. I get >> 40-60Mbytes between my FreeBSD 5.4 and Windows 2K box via Samba. Good >> NICs help. Intel 10/100 Pro. >> >> Google for Samba tuning also. >> >> -Sean >> >> >> >> On Jul 26, 2005, at 4:00 PM, Andrew P. wrote: >> >> >>> Hello all! >>> >>> I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95 >>> workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC >>> cable. >>> I am now able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between all kinds of Windows >>> 2000/XP machines with all kinds of cheapest 100Mbit ethernet >>> hardware. >>> >>> But I have never ever exceeded 8-9Mbytes/s between a Windows machine >>> and a FreeBSD box - _never_. Be it Samba, different ftp/http >>> servers, >>> different FreeBSD versions (4.x/5.x), with ipfw enabled or disabled, >>> etc., - the speed always hovers around 7-8Mb/s. I know it's not >>> critical, I know I should've upgraded to Gigabit hardware long ago, >>> but is there something wrong? >>> >>> I tried different linux distros, but they all seem to be even >>> slower. Wazzup?.. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Andrew P. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >>> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >>> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 23:27:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C3B16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:27:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from casey@phantombsd.org) Received: from phantombsd.org (dsl231-036-158.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.36.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D41743D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:27:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from casey@phantombsd.org) Received: by phantombsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 17954102F12; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:27:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.phantombsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phantombsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE26102C61; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:27:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 199.181.134.212 (SquirrelMail authenticated user casey) by mail.phantombsd.org with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:27:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <25096.199.181.134.212.1122420447.squirrel@mail.phantombsd.org> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:27:27 -0700 (PDT) From: "Casey Scott" To: "Andrew P." User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on eagle.phantombsd.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.4 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:27:30 -0000 > Hello all! > > I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95 > workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cable. > I am now able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between all kinds of Windows > 2000/XP machines with all kinds of cheapest 100Mbit ethernet hardware. > > But I have never ever exceeded 8-9Mbytes/s between a Windows machine > and a FreeBSD box - _never_. Be it Samba, different ftp/http servers, > different FreeBSD versions (4.x/5.x), with ipfw enabled or disabled, > etc., - the speed always hovers around 7-8Mb/s. I know it's not > critical, I know I should've upgraded to Gigabit hardware long ago, > but is there something wrong? > > I tried different linux distros, but they all seem to be even slower. > Wazzup?.. > > Thanks, > Andrew P. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Keep in mind that the Windows TCP/IP window buffers are not optimized the same way as FBSD or Linux. Casey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 23:40:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5308A16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:40:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C0D43D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:40:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i12so50127wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:40:00 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aWYz7SaZUv2GtCg/FCGe2ojkn3ZFiL+EXZ221BDumy9hn6Q6XTZvI6fResae0hWyORGcmqEaJBIeJnc4aq6TPvlD35WtzMo4Q+zuuqtw+tw7sF0l0aXiNxAxOVruax6DjOdQLE9DmN8Ky7b0wwKqllo0viS6FwRIBpirK/wngoU= Received: by 10.54.43.11 with SMTP id q11mr123739wrq; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:40:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.61.2 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:40:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:40:00 +0400 From: "Andrew P." To: Sean Hafeez In-Reply-To: <38AD37A2-3097-4209-BFF6-090B921BC131@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <491A44A6-1409-4D9E-AEFD-2B8665D52BA7@gmail.com> <38AD37A2-3097-4209-BFF6-090B921BC131@gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Andrew P." List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:40:01 -0000 You might be right in a sense, but like I said: Windows-to-Windows file transfers can easily be sustained at 11-12Mbytes/s. That's up to over 90% of 100Mbit bandwidth. In fact, if you review the theoretical part of Ethernet and TCP/IP, you'd find that it's very possible. On 7/27/05, Sean Hafeez wrote: > Let me fix my typo here..... >=20 > I get 60+Mbits out of 100Mbits on a 10/100 network. >=20 > The Max SUSTAINED thru-put you will ever see will be around 70Mbits. > There is an overhead that means that you will only see .7 of the > theoretical. >=20 > -Sean >=20 > On Jul 26, 2005, at 4:13 PM, Andrew P. wrote: >=20 > > Erm, well 60+Mbytes is no wonder in a Gigabit environment (and it is > > too much of a wonder in a FastEthernet one), but I'm interested in > > getting 100Mbit hardware to work at full speed. > > > > Thanks for your 2 cents anyway, > > Andrew P. > > > > On 7/27/05, Sean Hafeez wrote: > > > >> I get 60+Mbytes between my FreeBSD 5.4 and Mac via NFS. I get > >> 40-60Mbytes between my FreeBSD 5.4 and Windows 2K box via Samba. Good > >> NICs help. Intel 10/100 Pro. > >> > >> Google for Samba tuning also. > >> > >> -Sean > >> > >> > >> > >> On Jul 26, 2005, at 4:00 PM, Andrew P. wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Hello all! > >>> > >>> I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95 > >>> workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC > >>> cable. > >>> I am now able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between all kinds of Windows > >>> 2000/XP machines with all kinds of cheapest 100Mbit ethernet > >>> hardware. > >>> > >>> But I have never ever exceeded 8-9Mbytes/s between a Windows machine > >>> and a FreeBSD box - _never_. Be it Samba, different ftp/http > >>> servers, > >>> different FreeBSD versions (4.x/5.x), with ipfw enabled or disabled, > >>> etc., - the speed always hovers around 7-8Mb/s. I know it's not > >>> critical, I know I should've upgraded to Gigabit hardware long ago, > >>> but is there something wrong? > >>> > >>> I tried different linux distros, but they all seem to be even > >>> slower. Wazzup?.. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Andrew P. > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > >>> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >=20 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 23:42:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8AD16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:42:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8494843D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:42:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1DxZ49-0007ro-WA for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:42:30 -0400 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6QNnl3V048136 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:49:47 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j6QNnk7Q048135 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:49:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:49:45 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20050726183029.M97284@neptune.atopia.net> <200507261807.23024.lane@joeandlane.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507261849.46220.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec7931d656346e32a0c5378686eb24598ec5350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: cat /dev/urandom X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:42:31 -0000 On Tuesday 26 July 2005 18:18, Michael Beattie wrote: > `cat /dev/urandom` will do just that... it's not also going to run > code from within that output. > > On 7/26/05, Lane wrote: > > On Tuesday 26 July 2005 17:35, Michael Beattie wrote: > > > On 7/26/05, Matt Juszczak wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Quick question. > > > > > > > > shell# cat /dev/urandom > > > > > > > > can that executed as root cause any harm to the system? What if a > > > > random sequence of `rm *` was generated... would it be executed? > > > > > > > > I tried that to fix my terminal and forgot it might cause damage as > > > > root, even if its just being cat'd to the screen. I thought I saw > > > > some files fly by which would indicate an execution of `ls`.... > > > > > > > > Just curious.... > > > > > > If you had a file with an rm * in it and you cat'd it would it execute? > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > That's a good answer, but what if the command was: > > > > `cat /dev/urandom` > > > > could /dev/urandom generate arbitrary and potentially executable code? > > > > I'm curious, too > > > > lane > > _______________________________________________ Hmmm.... interesting. if I create a file, test, in the current directory like this: echo -n ls -al >test Then type `cat test` I get a directory listing. Assuming that /dev/urandom generates something like "ls -al" followed by a newline, then it stands to reason that `cat /dev/urandom` will actually execute the command "ls -al" Why is it that this does not hold true for `cat /dev/urandom` ? Still curious lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 23:46:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCF316A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:46:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3541C43D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:46:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i12so50715wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:46:08 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mx/BNEVNay3Jk0xJI7mHEYwfUPpZVCsAleMpyXcR/ZYAYM3nZDMAK8s9uTxaAs4LNxO7KY44ZMO41HfWOTKrRN24bVPNbD56acCiCxLMD2Ogx2qRWYB8wyGNPK96coAJIUDUlSBmX7ybPYlml3HrA8uIrsswBrxwaSWh/a5+zwk= Received: by 10.54.43.11 with SMTP id q11mr125161wrq; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:46:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:46:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:46:08 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: FreeBSD - Questions In-Reply-To: <44ek9lnvm8.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <44ek9lnvm8.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:46:09 -0000 On 26 Jul 2005 16:46:39 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > FreeBSD 6 (which hasn't been released yet, and will change a bit more > before it is) is still very cutting edge. I would *strongly* > recommend that you follow the -CURRENT mailing list if you're going to > use it. >=20 > Nikolas Britton writes: >=20 > > On 7/26/05, Nikolas Britton wrote: > > > On 7/26/05, Nikolas Britton wrote: > > > > Do I always need to run 'make cleandepend' when rebuilding a kernel= , > > > > normally I build my kernels the old school way? > > > > > > > > Is it just me or is -O2 now the default for kernel builds? What abo= ut > > > > -Os, safe to use? >=20 > Yes, and not sure. >=20 > > > > The kernel build failed when it tired to compile the r128drm device= . >=20 > With a default kernel? Try updating your sources again. >=20 I can try it again and post the error > > > > Is it safe to run the ULE scheduler instead of the 4BSD scheduler, = ULE > > > > is commented out in the default kernel? >=20 > See the -CURRENT list archives. It's gotten fairly stable for a lot > of people, and performs better in a number of cases, but it still > causes trouble in some others. What kind of troubles are we talking about? also I see that preemption is now on by default. I have been running preemption on a 5.x box of a long time now, no problems. =20 >=20 > > > > Is the new ATA RAID stuff, metadata something, going to be backport= ed > > > > to 5.x? I'm trying setup a RAID 1 mirror with Intel ICH5R / Adaptec > > > > HostRAID but it looks like it's not supported in 5.x >=20 > Search for messages about that. SOS@ has discussed it quite a bit, if > I recall correctly. >=20 > > > One more thing... Will FreeBSD 5.4 kernel modules work under 6.x? >=20 Yes I just found that out when I tried to load the Highpoint RAID driver on FreeBSD 6, the system panics very early in the boot process. This means that FreeBSD 6 is completely out of the question for this system and I really did not want to run 6.x anyways, I'm migrating a production 5.4 server to this new hardware. What is SOS@? and where can I read the discussions about sata RAID problems? I seem to have two options for this server: (1) Get the ICH5R / Adaptec HostRAID working with 5.4 (as device ar0, ad4 += ad6) (2) Find a (cheap) SATA RAID 1 card that is supported by the ar / ata device in 5.4. The problem with (2) is that I can't find any cheap (less then $60 USD) SATA RAID 1 cards that will work with device ar. I'm going to post this problem to a new thread. >=20 > > > > Sorry! a few more things: > > > > At boot up I get these errors / warnings: > > "kenv: unable to get dumpdev" >=20 > Try setting dumpdev? >=20 > > "no such user: _dhcp, falling back to "nobody"" > > > > I left groups and master.passwd files to deal with later in > > mergemaster and then I manually added the dhcp user to both of those > > files but the system still can't find him. >=20 > You rebuilt the password database, right? You know you can't just > open up the password file and edit it? No I did not, how do I regenerate the database? normally I use pw or vipw when I change that stuff and I've never been asked by mergemaster to change those files. Also with mergemaster it seemed like 50% of the 100 or so files that where changed where just changes to the cvs doc revision / timestamp... wouldn't it be better to install those files by default instead of asking the user? >=20 > > "Starting default moused: moused: unable to open /dev/ums0: Device busy= " > > > > I don't know whats up with that but my mouse does work. >=20 > And if you disable moused? Not sure, I installed it on one of my home systems and I'm at work. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 23:46:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A7A16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:46:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719A443D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:46:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so55889wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:46:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NtBLjPe6rui1XjSW+rBY5L0TT6PaKeLXsdJ1e0rmoECCzyV27Y98E+S+rz39mxOntYcP2Hgb8wslg0PvQDzC/YvVGXVE+TOLbPBMFfQ1wbbt1fT8V8Ru2xfPCnzsvASiuvBykm+WrhV9mtmHOe+fRN2ZI9iVXl5SxXs+OyoY2uc= Received: by 10.54.27.50 with SMTP id a50mr111642wra; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:46:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.61.2 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:46:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:46:33 +0400 From: "Andrew P." To: Casey Scott In-Reply-To: <25096.199.181.134.212.1122420447.squirrel@mail.phantombsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <25096.199.181.134.212.1122420447.squirrel@mail.phantombsd.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Andrew P." List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:46:38 -0000 On 7/27/05, Casey Scott wrote: > > Hello all! > > > > I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95 > > workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cable. > > I am now able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between all kinds of Windows > > 2000/XP machines with all kinds of cheapest 100Mbit ethernet hardware. > > > > But I have never ever exceeded 8-9Mbytes/s between a Windows machine > > and a FreeBSD box - _never_. Be it Samba, different ftp/http servers, > > different FreeBSD versions (4.x/5.x), with ipfw enabled or disabled, > > etc., - the speed always hovers around 7-8Mb/s. I know it's not > > critical, I know I should've upgraded to Gigabit hardware long ago, > > but is there something wrong? > > > > I tried different linux distros, but they all seem to be even slower. > > Wazzup?.. > > > > Thanks, > > Andrew P. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >=20 >=20 > Keep in mind that the Windows TCP/IP window buffers are not optimized the > same way as FBSD or Linux. >=20 > Casey >=20 >=20 No doubt about that. Any thoughts about how to make them communicate more effectively? Personally, I don't think it's just window buffers. I think the whole darn TCP/IP stack misconfiguration plus maybe not perfect NIC drivers are the reason for underperformance. I know that most of the real "mistakes" must be on the Windows side, but that's not an excuse for FreeBSD/Linux to not be at least 99%-Windows-networking-compatible. Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 23:47:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C0616A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:47:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mtbeedee@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27B343D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:47:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mtbeedee@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i12so50868wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:47:42 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OlrIiRIqDVuirmqhYHwjkJfVS0DfhPnNI2Sbx2kAaxF2ZysPPJmmkkU1jhvKP7QevNE2QVnldY/TnI4R2dFZwdKEkZ0wEciS5Ux0cjYsl6qAip9FfTMMZYmWpSgh8osf1G1YJ2Ccwa7XDsjbkBm+6nq3veR4alF0lZoSEOcRk7g= Received: by 10.54.43.11 with SMTP id q11mr125544wrq; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:47:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.159.14 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:47:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:47:42 -0400 From: Michael Beattie To: Lane In-Reply-To: <200507261849.46220.lane@joeandlane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050726183029.M97284@neptune.atopia.net> <200507261807.23024.lane@joeandlane.com> <200507261849.46220.lane@joeandlane.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cat /dev/urandom X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michael Beattie List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:47:43 -0000 On 7/26/05, Lane wrote: > On Tuesday 26 July 2005 18:18, Michael Beattie wrote: > > `cat /dev/urandom` will do just that... it's not also going to run > > code from within that output. > > > > On 7/26/05, Lane wrote: > > > On Tuesday 26 July 2005 17:35, Michael Beattie wrote: > > > > On 7/26/05, Matt Juszczak wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > Quick question. > > > > > > > > > > shell# cat /dev/urandom > > > > > > > > > > can that executed as root cause any harm to the system? What if = a > > > > > random sequence of `rm *` was generated... would it be executed? > > > > > > > > > > I tried that to fix my terminal and forgot it might cause damage = as > > > > > root, even if its just being cat'd to the screen. I thought I sa= w > > > > > some files fly by which would indicate an execution of `ls`.... > > > > > > > > > > Just curious.... > > > > > > > > If you had a file with an rm * in it and you cat'd it would it exec= ute? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > That's a good answer, but what if the command was: > > > > > > `cat /dev/urandom` > > > > > > could /dev/urandom generate arbitrary and potentially executable code= ? > > > > > > I'm curious, too > > > > > > lane > > > _______________________________________________ > Hmmm.... interesting. >=20 > if I create a file, test, in the current directory like this: >=20 > echo -n ls -al >test >=20 > Then type `cat test` >=20 > I get a directory listing. >=20 > Assuming that /dev/urandom generates something like "ls -al" followed by = a > newline, then it stands to reason that `cat /dev/urandom` will actually > execute the command "ls -al" >=20 > Why is it that this does not hold true for `cat /dev/urandom` ? >=20 > Still curious >=20 Huh. Look at that. I guess I was wrong. I wonder why... Maybe the `` makes it "escape" from the shell and so it cats the file and then when it comes back to the shell it sees the ls -al and runs it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 23:48:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6587516A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:48:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B43E543D49 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:48:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so56144wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:48:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IYl5SUTKQP2V/RhD6RhQ7dyJWV7wwhre2eXW/lic6reduugihSXBLMna17RR27smq7Ma2PJcd/QyFaJ3yxrOmiO/3bZ9KsEUUWxsf7Q/xkTQMK4uek3XCkqFaqpAT7vty7gZfW3iaKkcP1QDojXz4qsgt2X3Ixo1yqmOCnfIs1g= Received: by 10.54.45.14 with SMTP id s14mr122459wrs; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:48:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.61.2 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:48:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:48:33 +0400 From: "Andrew P." To: "Michael C. Shultz" In-Reply-To: <200507261631.45751.ringworm01@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200507261631.45751.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Andrew P." List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:48:34 -0000 On 7/27/05, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > On Tuesday 26 July 2005 16:00, Andrew P. wrote: > > Hello all! > > > > I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95 > > workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cable. > > I am now able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between all kinds of Windows > > 2000/XP machines with all kinds of cheapest 100Mbit ethernet hardware. > > > > But I have never ever exceeded 8-9Mbytes/s between a Windows machine > > and a FreeBSD box - _never_. Be it Samba, different ftp/http servers, > > different FreeBSD versions (4.x/5.x), with ipfw enabled or disabled, > > etc., - the speed always hovers around 7-8Mb/s. I know it's not > > critical, I know I should've upgraded to Gigabit hardware long ago, > > but is there something wrong? > > > > I tried different linux distros, but they all seem to be even slower. > > Wazzup?.. > > > > Thanks, > > Andrew P. >=20 > Here is the "ifconfig" output from a machine that has one nic set at > 10Mbit/half duplex and one at 100Mbit full duplex. how does it compare wi= th > your system? >=20 > xl0: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > options=3D1 > inet6 fe80::210:4bff:fe70:4fb0%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > inet 71.102.0.97 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 71.102.0.255 > ether 00:10:4b:70:4f:b0 > media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP) > status: active > xl1: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > options=3D1 > inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 > inet6 fe80::210:4bff:fe0a:7cbc%xl1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > ether 00:10:4b:0a:7c:bc > media: Ethernet 100baseTX > status: active >=20 Well, if that really matters to you: (freebsd 5.4) vr0: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::20f:3dff:feca:c494%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 192.168.17.217 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.17.255 ether 00:0f:3d:ca:c4:94 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active rl0: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 options=3D8 inet 192.168.17.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.17.255 ether 00:40:f4:8d:a7:f8 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active rl1: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 options=3D8 ether 00:40:f4:8d:9c:af media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active (fedora core 4) eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:81:2F:04:3E inet addr:193.233.5.13 Bcast:193.233.5.63 Mask:255.255.255.192 inet6 addr: fe80::2e0:81ff:fe2f:43e/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:123946466 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:176380358 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:42267471987 (39.3 GiB) TX bytes:197116022761 (183.5 GiB= ) Interrupt:177 Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 23:49:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7AD816A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:49:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob89@eng.ufl.edu) Received: from scorpion.eng.ufl.edu (scorpion.eng.ufl.edu [128.227.116.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E05B43D48 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:49:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob89@eng.ufl.edu) Received: (qmail 29936 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2005 23:49:17 -0000 Received: from scanner.engnet.ufl.edu (128.227.152.221) by scorpion.eng.ufl.edu with SMTP; 26 Jul 2005 23:49:17 -0000 From: Bob Johnson Organization: UF College of Engineering To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:49:15 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507261949.16230.bob89@eng.ufl.edu> Cc: matt@atopia.net Subject: cat /dev/urandom X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:49:18 -0000 Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 6:32 PM Matt Juszczak > Hi all, > > Quick question. > > shell# cat /dev/urandom > > can that executed as root cause any harm to the system? What if a random > sequence of `rm *` was generated... would it be executed? > Not from a virtual terminal. There may have been an old hardware "smart" terminals that would let you trick it into echoing stuff back through the keyboard buffer with the appropriate esc sequence, but emulators for those have such functions disabled by default these days, for the obvious reason. I'm willing to assume that includes whatever you are using for a terminal program. > I tried that to fix my terminal and forgot it might cause damage as root, > even if its just being cat'd to the screen. I thought I saw some files > fly by which would indicate an execution of `ls`.... Highly unlikely, unless you are actually using an old hardware terminal, then it is still pretty unlikely. For example: $ cat test.txt This is a test file. test test `ls -l /` test cat just types the characters out on the screen. The `ls -l` didn't get executed. > > Just curious.... > - Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 00:03:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EEE16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:03:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd.wang@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED18343D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:03:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd.wang@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 70so61109wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:03:13 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=c7wrs2k68UaCg2Q5lyKkyP8seRlZTExdWyxlmxgwMW48R9WRbEJ8MmGDGhenr5PWVDorWoIxTiI9kNT7hOh4Qfy+245luj7yzIyeQ7rDnNa/lgsaJG/4Q29lrqwzZ8+JhmzNKfuksyi9EWPXUtqnHp9c4HQz6+5f2F5VVIbdT24= Received: by 10.54.24.49 with SMTP id 49mr122605wrx; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:03:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.114.18 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:03:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:03:12 +0800 From: Wang FreeBSD To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: buildkernel failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Wang FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:03:14 -0000 I'm a programmer on Windows but a newbie to FreeBSD. I installed a new FreeBSD 5.2.1 and want to upgrade to 5-STABLE. I had try 5.4 and meet the problem too. When I buildworld meet some problem in libstdc++, can't found unwind.h. I fixed it by modify the Makefile under libstdc++, set CXXFLAGS has the same including path with CFLAGS, it's gone further.=20 But failed in libgroff again, fixed by same way and make again. It's report a function declare mkstemp in "lib.h" conflict with the declare in "stdlib.h". I modify the "lib.h" and a macro definition to disable declare in "stdlib.h". The problem doesn't solved but becomes biger and biger. So I rename /usr/src to /usr/src_bak and get the 5-STABLE source file. when I buildkernel, it raise error about config. How can I do? Thank you very much! =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D alan# make buildkernel =20 -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Wed Jul 27 07:42:42 CST 2005 -------------------------------------------------------------- =3D=3D=3D> GENERIC mkdir -p /usr/obj/usr/src/sys =20 -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> stage 1: configuring the kernel -------------------------------------------------------------- cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf;=20 PATH=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/u= sr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/games:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/sbi= n:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:= /usr/sbin:/usr/bin config -d /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC=20 /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC ERROR: version of config(8) does not match kernel! config version =3D 500012, version required =3D 500013 =20 Make sure that /usr/src/usr.sbin/config is in sync with your /usr/src/sys and install a new config binary before trying this again. =20 If running the new config fails check your config file against the GENERIC or LINT config files for changes in config syntax, or option/device naming conventions =20 *** Error code 1 =20 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 =20 Stop in /usr/src. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D uname -a=20 FreeBSD alan.jane.net 5.2.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Feb 23 20:45:55 GMT 2004 =20 root@wv1u.btc.adaptec.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D /etc/make.conf CPUTYPE=3Di686 CFLAGS=3D -O -pipe CXXFLAGS=3D -O -pipe #CXFLAGS+=3D -fmemoize-lookups -fsave-memoized COPTFLAGS=3D -O -pipe #WANT_FORCE_OPTIMIZATION_DOWNGRADE=3D1 = =20 NO_FORTRAN=3D true NO_I4B =3D true NO_IPFILTER=3D true NO_LPR =3D true NO_OBJC =3D true NO_SENDMAIL=3D true NOGAMES =3D true NO_MAILWRAPPER=3D true From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 00:04:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ACC416A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:04:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8069B43D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:04:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1DxZPe-0001ZC-TZ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:04:43 -0400 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6R0C1Tl049665 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:12:01 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j6R0C0mT049664 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:12:00 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:11:59 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20050726183029.M97284@neptune.atopia.net> <200507261849.46220.lane@joeandlane.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507261912.00255.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79fb837e18df17e0d2a2ec1bbc679a9725350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: cat /dev/urandom X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:04:44 -0000 On Tuesday 26 July 2005 18:47, Michael Beattie wrote: > On 7/26/05, Lane wrote: > > On Tuesday 26 July 2005 18:18, Michael Beattie wrote: > > > `cat /dev/urandom` will do just that... it's not also going to run > > > code from within that output. > > > > > > On 7/26/05, Lane wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 26 July 2005 17:35, Michael Beattie wrote: > > > > > On 7/26/05, Matt Juszczak wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > Quick question. > > > > > > > > > > > > shell# cat /dev/urandom > > > > > > > > > > > > can that executed as root cause any harm to the system? What if > > > > > > a random sequence of `rm *` was generated... would it be > > > > > > executed? > > > > > > > > > > > > I tried that to fix my terminal and forgot it might cause damage > > > > > > as root, even if its just being cat'd to the screen. I thought I > > > > > > saw some files fly by which would indicate an execution of > > > > > > `ls`.... > > > > > > > > > > > > Just curious.... > > > > > > > > > > If you had a file with an rm * in it and you cat'd it would it > > > > > execute? _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > That's a good answer, but what if the command was: > > > > > > > > `cat /dev/urandom` > > > > > > > > could /dev/urandom generate arbitrary and potentially executable > > > > code? > > > > > > > > I'm curious, too > > > > > > > > lane > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Hmmm.... interesting. > > > > if I create a file, test, in the current directory like this: > > > > echo -n ls -al >test > > > > Then type `cat test` > > > > I get a directory listing. > > > > Assuming that /dev/urandom generates something like "ls -al" followed by > > a newline, then it stands to reason that `cat /dev/urandom` will actually > > execute the command "ls -al" > > > > Why is it that this does not hold true for `cat /dev/urandom` ? > > > > Still curious > > Huh. Look at that. I guess I was wrong. I wonder why... > > Maybe the `` makes it "escape" from the shell and so it cats the file > and then when it comes back to the shell it sees the ls -al and runs > it. Yeah, backticks are good for that. it seems like /dev/urandom generates mostly ... random ... stuff. But I wonder if there are any safeguards to prevent such a combination from being generated. After reading "man 4 random" and /usr/src/sys/dev/random/randomdev.c, it seems that the output of /dev/urandom is "truly random." So I guess the only thing that prevents such an occurrence is careful thought before you make such a call :) lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 00:16:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A772316A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:16:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3935D43D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:16:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so59801wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:16:05 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Vrt36UZ4DQDYIPrqEwfuG0dyp8EM5c+q4hNJbndWK1bKLETZe07IMvZ/QgEJZ5YCms0UmZw3GPY0WA6Lh9QbHPLYlihMx4L5mGVgHo/b5EsdoHiL52ld3rMHIdh0+XqPcGN4ezvI+EVwc0jVpCIi9nch22Cr/KvJanNug4P4754= Received: by 10.54.8.60 with SMTP id 60mr113891wrh; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:16:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:16:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:16:05 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= In-Reply-To: <42E69B11.6070208@t-hosting.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <42E69B11.6070208@t-hosting.hu> Cc: FreeBSD - Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:16:06 -0000 On 7/26/05, K=F6vesd=E1n G=E1bor wrote: > Nikolas Britton wrote: >=20 > >Is it just me or is -O2 now the default for kernel builds? What about > >-Os, safe to use? > > > > > > > So is it for me. But if I specify some CFLAGS, for example -O3 > -march=3Dathlon64, the > building fails, but CFLAGS mustn't affect the kernel compiling process > afaik. There is > COPTFLAGS for that reason. I've also made a PR about this new, unwanted > behaviour, > but haven't got any answers so yet. >=20 You are right, COPTCLAGS is for the kernel only. -O3 is not officially supported for CFLAGS or COPTFLAGS. If you use -O3 for CFLAGS it will break some ports. Also from my experience using anything higher then CPUTYPE=3Dp2 will break ports (like gstreamer). This is what I normally add to my make.conf file: CPUTYPE=3Dp2 CFLAGS=3D -Os -pipes COPTFLAGS=3D -Os -pipes #CXXFLAGS=3D don't remember what I set this too, don't use it a lot. If I want a port to build with different settings I just tell it to inline... make CPUTYPE=3Dp4 install clean etc. As far as -O2 as the default for the kernel... I thought it was more important to have a small kernel then a faster but fatter one. The smaller the kernel the more you can put in L1,2, and 3 cache and the smaller the program the less it needs to hit ram, swap, and hard disk? isn't this what apple does with their OS-X builds? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 00:21:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4DF116A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:21:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmacpherson@mainframe.ca) Received: from wale.mainframe.ca (wale.mainframe.ca [209.17.131.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2ED43D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:21:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmacpherson@mainframe.ca) Received: from jupiter.mainframe.ca ([10.0.0.12] helo=mail.mainframe.ca) by wale.mainframe.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1DxZfm-000Pn9-3k for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:21:22 -0700 Received: from [172.16.139.102] (helo=Mandarin-04.mainframe.ca) by mail.mainframe.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1DxZdy-000JCp-LC for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:19:30 -0700 From: Derrick MacPherson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Mainframe Entertainment Inc Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:21:20 -0700 Message-Id: <1122423681.3942.71.camel@Mandarin-04.mainframe.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-16) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Squid. No not Squidward. and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:21:22 -0000 Is there a document about setting up squid, optimization suggestions etc available somewhere? I've started looking and not come back with much that's new. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 00:35:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E0B16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:35:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail25.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail25.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C83743D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:35:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 23822 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2005 00:35:46 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail25.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Jul 2005 00:35:45 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 2CE1626; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:35:45 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Lane References: <20050726183029.M97284@neptune.atopia.net> <200507261807.23024.lane@joeandlane.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 26 Jul 2005 20:35:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200507261807.23024.lane@joeandlane.com> Message-ID: <44wtndnl0f.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 28 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cat /dev/urandom X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:35:46 -0000 Lane writes: > On Tuesday 26 July 2005 17:35, Michael Beattie wrote: > > On 7/26/05, Matt Juszczak wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Quick question. > > > > > > shell# cat /dev/urandom > > > > > > can that executed as root cause any harm to the system? What if a random > > > sequence of `rm *` was generated... would it be executed? > > > > > > I tried that to fix my terminal and forgot it might cause damage as root, > > > even if its just being cat'd to the screen. I thought I saw some files > > > fly by which would indicate an execution of `ls`.... > > > > > > Just curious.... > > > > If you had a file with an rm * in it and you cat'd it would it execute? > > _______________________________________________ > That's a good answer, but what if the command was: > > `cat /dev/urandom` > > could /dev/urandom generate arbitrary and potentially executable code? Sure. It also might produce "Hamlet". From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 00:50:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4486816A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:50:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FE843D4C for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:50:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.246.232] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id AA6B84D10106; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:50:51 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6R0pdM2030888 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:51:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6R0pYXL030887; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:51:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:51:34 -0700 Message-ID: <3tll3tystl.l3t@mail.opusnet.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Can someone clarify ipfw's in/out/recv/xmit/via concepts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:50:56 -0000 I see in another msg that I'm not the only one scratching my head over the ipfw manpage's explanation of in/out/recv/xmit/via concepts. I've spent many hours reading that manpage and working on my rc.firewall (and it seems to work OK, based on the logging), but I can't figure out what it's trying to tell me, even with that nice ASCII art. (I hope your replies will help me get some clarifications into the manpage.) ^ to upper layers v | | +----------->-----------+ ^ v [ip_input] [ip_output] net.inet.ip.fw.enable=1 | | ^ v [ether_demux] [ether_output_frame] net.link.ether.ipfw=1 | | +-->--[bdg_forward]-->--+ net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw=1 ^ v | to devices | + + FROM BOTH TO BOTH NICS? NICS? Here's a pic of my firewall: +------------------------------+ | +-------------------------+ | | | KERNEL | | | +-------------------------+ | | | | | | | | v ^ v ^ | | | | | | | | +-----+ +-----+ | | | NIC | FW | NIC | | | +-----+ +-----+ | | | | | | | +------------------------------+ | | | | v ^ v ^ | | | | WAN LAN The manpage says we have incoming and outgoing packets. In and out of what? NIC or kernel or ipfw or computer? The manpage describes: recv | xmit | via {ifX | if* | ipno | any} Is my "de0" an "ifX" or an "if*"? ("exact name" or "device name") What would be an example of the other? Does "ipno" mean an numerical Internet address? (It's not mentioned elsewhere in the manpage.) Does each of my NICs have both of the manpage's xmit and recv interfaces, or is one an xmit and one a recv for any one packet rule? If an incoming packet can be associated with an xmit interface, why can't an outgoing packet be associated with a recv interface? P.S. It seems that some people do their blocking of packets going from LAN to WAN "on" (so to speak) the LAN interface, some on the WAN interface, and some on both. It doesn't seem to make much difference on a pure firewall, except for rule-writing convenience. Right? I suppose it would be best to put blocks everywhere possible or at least "where" the packets enter the computer. Right? Help!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 01:00:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E00616A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:00:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF2E43D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:00:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5EAF5EE7; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:00:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 53589-06; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:00:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-54-113.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.54.113]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDF25C39; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:59:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42E6DC80.3040501@mac.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:59:44 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derrick MacPherson References: <1122423681.3942.71.camel@Mandarin-04.mainframe.ca> In-Reply-To: <1122423681.3942.71.camel@Mandarin-04.mainframe.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Squid. No not Squidward. and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:00:22 -0000 Derrick MacPherson wrote: > Is there a document about setting up squid, optimization suggestions etc > available somewhere? I've started looking and not come back with much > that's new. Squid has reams of documentation available at www.squid-cache.org...? -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 01:03:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F8F16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:03:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5BF43D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:03:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.246.232] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id AD4956C8012C; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:03:05 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6R13qRr031104; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:03:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6R13hxo031103; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:03:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: Michael Beattie References: <20050726183029.M97284@neptune.atopia.net> <200507261807.23024.lane@joeandlane.com> <200507261849.46220.lane@joeandlane.com> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:03:43 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Michael Beattie's message of "Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:47:42 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Lane , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cat /dev/urandom X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:03:11 -0000 I don't use backticks, so this'll have the equivalent "$()". The command: cat /dev/urandom is passed to the shell and the shell executes "cat" and sends the output to the screen without possibility of executing anything (except the magic stuff recognized by your terminal emulator -- I hope it can't execute stuff). The command: $(cat /dev/random) is passed to the shell, where it does "command substitution" on it first and then executes it, where "it" is the output of the cat command, which could be destructive. Simpler tests are: pwd echo pwd $(echo pwd) echo $(echo pwd) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 01:03:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA97716A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:03:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmacpherson@mainframe.ca) Received: from wale.mainframe.ca (wale.mainframe.ca [209.17.131.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECF643D53 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:03:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmacpherson@mainframe.ca) Received: from jupiter.mainframe.ca ([10.0.0.12] helo=mail.mainframe.ca) by wale.mainframe.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1DxaKd-000PsY-EY; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:03:35 -0700 Received: from [172.16.139.102] (helo=Mandarin-04.mainframe.ca) by mail.mainframe.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1DxaIp-000KGe-Td; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:01:44 -0700 From: Derrick MacPherson To: Chuck Swiger In-Reply-To: <42E6DC80.3040501@mac.com> References: <1122423681.3942.71.camel@Mandarin-04.mainframe.ca> <42E6DC80.3040501@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Mainframe Entertainment Inc Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:03:34 -0700 Message-Id: <1122426215.3942.86.camel@Mandarin-04.mainframe.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-16) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Squid. No not Squidward. and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:03:37 -0000 On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 20:59 -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Derrick MacPherson wrote: > > Is there a document about setting up squid, optimization suggestions etc > > available somewhere? I've started looking and not come back with much > > that's new. > > Squid has reams of documentation available at www.squid-cache.org...? > Yes they do, I was hoping to find a more freebsd specific document in regards to customizing the kernel or any other bits on the machine. I did find one document that looked promising, not sure where I got that now. Thanks Chuck. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 01:12:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDBD16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:12:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from smtpauth06.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth06.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2E843D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:12:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by smtpauth06.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1DxaSt-0002Sg-BS for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:12:07 -0400 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6R1JPhr057159 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:19:25 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j6R1JPcn057158 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:19:25 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:19:24 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20050726183029.M97284@neptune.atopia.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507262019.25060.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79b88bf67cc8b7b78706ecba7dfea5ce1d350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: cat /dev/urandom X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:12:08 -0000 On Tuesday 26 July 2005 20:03, you wrote: > I don't use backticks, so this'll have the equivalent "$()". > > The command: cat /dev/urandom > is passed to the shell and the shell executes "cat" and sends > the output to the screen without possibility of executing anything > (except the magic stuff recognized by your terminal emulator -- I hope > it can't execute stuff). > > The command: $(cat /dev/random) > is passed to the shell, where it does "command substitution" on > it first and then executes it, where "it" is the output of the > cat command, which could be destructive. > > Simpler tests are: > > pwd > echo pwd > $(echo pwd) > echo $(echo pwd) I think the backticks (and shell variables) actually send the output to a pipe, not the screen. I use them in recursive shell scripts, on occasion, which are run by the cron daemon. Either technique can be a blessing ... or a curse, depending on how you use them. lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 01:17:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693DD16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:17:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A61243D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:17:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB525EE7; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:17:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 53589-10; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:17:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-54-113.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.54.113]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60BB85E22; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:17:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42E6E0B3.20409@mac.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:17:39 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Gary W. Swearingen" References: <3tll3tystl.l3t@mail.opusnet.com> In-Reply-To: <3tll3tystl.l3t@mail.opusnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can someone clarify ipfw's in/out/recv/xmit/via concepts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:17:51 -0000 Gary W. Swearingen wrote: [ ... ] > The manpage says we have incoming and outgoing packets. > In and out of what? Into and out of the system. > NIC or kernel or ipfw or computer? Yes, all of those. > The manpage describes: > recv | xmit | via {ifX | if* | ipno | any} > > Is my "de0" an "ifX" or an "if*"? > ("exact name" or "device name") "de0" is an "ifX". > What would be an example of the other? "de*"? > Does "ipno" mean an numerical Internet address? > (It's not mentioned elsewhere in the manpage.) I think so. > Does each of my NICs have both of the manpage's xmit and recv > interfaces, or is one an xmit and one a recv for any one packet rule? Each of your NICs is logically a full-duplex device, which can both xmit and recv. > If an incoming packet can be associated with an xmit interface, why > can't an outgoing packet be associated with a recv interface? A packet which was created on the machine does not have an interface which it was received on. Packets which are being forwarded from other machines would have a recv interface. > It seems that some people do their blocking of packets > going from LAN to WAN "on" (so to speak) the LAN interface, some on > the WAN interface, and some on both. It doesn't seem to make much > difference on a pure firewall, except for rule-writing convenience. > Right? That depends entirely upon the rules, it's not useful to make a generalization like that without a more specific context. Normally, people should use the "xmit via ifX" syntax for pipe/queue rules to avoid counting traffic twice as the packets pass through, but they can also be used to ensure that, say, traffic to 127.0.0.1 only goes through lo0, and not through some external connection by someone trying to source-route in as localhost. > I suppose it would be best to put blocks everywhere possible > or at least "where" the packets enter the computer. Right? If you are creating a firewall, you need to create a network topology which permits you to control network access, which means restricting traffic which flows over well-defined choke points (ie, your external internet links). -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 01:24:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 156BD16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:24:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd.wang@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FCC743D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:24:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd.wang@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i21so65062wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:24:42 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=THUnIupRNTiY/IuUs1ZBA8ZTHYb1gyWNjy024zoc6N8iCwLrP4ADeihXvrNsw5eu/FU7cc8CSRkbiePkGhTbWKcSNwzlVh6PH1vpWn/54dtxVm/fUrOUHImQBmZzi5ubV2zIlIlXHY9E7UV+Y7V+FOhf3b+j5tuM9OUpiKKVIWc= Received: by 10.54.120.12 with SMTP id s12mr131945wrc; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:24:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.114.18 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:24:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:24:42 +0800 From: Wang FreeBSD To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Reisenweber?= In-Reply-To: <5367E0E3-D54B-4E94-834D-749B14FE2872@reusel.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline References: <5367E0E3-D54B-4E94-834D-749B14FE2872@reusel.de> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: buildkernel failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Wang FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:24:44 -0000 VGhhbmsgeW91IHZlcnkgbXVjaCEKSSBoYWQgdHJ5IHRvIGJ1aWxkd29ybGQgd2l0aCBzb3VyY2Ug Y29kZSBvZiBjdnN1cCB0YWcgUkVMRU5HXzVfNCBhbmQKbWVldCBtYW55IHByb2JsZW0uIEl0IHNl ZW0gdGhhdCBzb21lIHByb2JsZW0gd2l0aCB0aGUgY29uZmlnLCBzbwpnZW5lcmF0ZWQgY29kZSBo YXMgc29tZSBidWdzLgpsaWJzdGRjKyssIHVud2luZC5oIGNhbid0IGZvdW5kCmxpYmdyb2ZmLCBu b25wb3NpeC5oIGNhbid0IGZvdW5kCgpJIGNoZWNrIHRoZSBlcnJvciBzaGVsbCBjb21tYW5kIGxp bmUgYW5kIGdldCBvbmUgaGVhZCBmaWxlIGluY2x1ZGUKcGF0aCBtaXNzaW5nLCBidXQgaXQgaXMg YXBwZWFyZWQgaW4gQ0ZMQUdT44CCSXQgcmFpc2VkIGVycm9yIGJlY2F1c2UKdGhlc2UgZmlsZXMg YXJlIEMrKyBmaWxlLCBjb21waWxlZCBieSBjKyssIGl0IGRvZXNuJ3QgdXNlIENGTEFHUyBhbmQK dXNlIENYWEZMQUdTIGluc3RlYWQuIFNvIEkgZml4ZWQgdGhlc2UgdHdvIHByb2JsZW0gYnkgbW9k aWZpZWQKdmFyaWFibGUgQ1hYRkxBR1MgaW4gTWFrZWZpbGUgb2YgbGlic3RkYysrIGFuZCBsaWJn cm9mZiwgaXQgd29ya3MuCiAgICAgQnV0IHdoZW4gSSBmaXhlZCBpdCwgYW5vdGhlciBwcm9ibGVt IGNhbWUgb3V0LCB0aGVyZSBpcyB0d28KdmVyc2lvbiBvZiBnZXRzdGVtcCBkZWNsYXJlLCBvbmUg aXMgYysrIHZlcnNpb24gaW4gImxpYi5oIiwgYW5vdGhlciBpcwpjIHZlcnNpb24gaW4gc3RkbGli LmguIEkgbW9kaWZpZWQgdGhlIGxpYi5oIGRlZmluZSBhIG1hY3JvIHRvIGRpc2FibGUKYyB2ZXJz aW9uIGluIHN0ZGxpYi5oLiBCdXQgaXQncyBub3QgdGhlIGVuZCwganVzdCBiZWdpbiwgc28gSSBn YXZlIHVwCmZpbmFsbHkuCgpPbiA3LzI3LzA1LCBKw7ZyZyBSZWlzZW53ZWJlciA8bWVAcmV1c2Vs LmRlPiB3cm90ZToKPiBIaSBXYW5nLAo+IAo+IAo+IEFtIDI3LjA3LjIwMDUgdW0gMDI6MDMgc2No cmllYiBXYW5nIEZyZWVCU0Q6Cj4gCj4gRVJST1I6IHZlcnNpb24gb2YgY29uZmlnKDgpIGRvZXMg bm90IG1hdGNoIGtlcm5lbCEKPiBjb25maWcgdmVyc2lvbiA9IDUwMDAxMiwgdmVyc2lvbiByZXF1 aXJlZCA9IDUwMDAxMwo+IAo+IAo+IGl0IHNlZW1zIHRvIG1lIHRoYXQgeW91IGhhdmUgdG8gZG8g YSAibWFrZSBidWlsZHdvcmxkIiBiZWZvcmUgbWFraW5nIHRoZSBuZXcKPiBrZXJuZWwuIFRoaXMg c2hvdWxkIHNvbHZlIHlvdXIgcHJvYmxtZSAtIG1heWJlIDspLgo+IAo+IFNvIGRvIGluIC91c3Iv c3JjLyBhCj4gCj4gICAgIG1ha2UgYnVpbGR3b3JsZAo+ICAgICBtYWtlIGtlcm5lbCBLRVJOQ09O Rj08WU9VUktFUk5FTD4KPiAgICAgaW5pdCA2Cj4gICAgIG1ha2UgaW5zdGFsbHdvcmxkCj4gICAg IGluaXQgNgo+IAo+IEhvcGUgdGhhdCBoZWxwcywKPiBKw7ZyZwo= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 01:27:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B0D16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:27:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mcbrune@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB6443D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:27:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mcbrune@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i21so65444wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:27:46 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Fzs8yegzKPXy8eUEvwaO8HCwdYMeKs2VGNy9pofdhmti8Mb7kA8vokpf4VK3Q17bD6piZuRofvzkhvFERXhYSOOWKEFAr2p9+AspohIbAfnBN1j5I4f/2IrXKvwgRomLR8PgBD2f0hBq1pWliemfAawZ1W9rtv4lzDete1utdL8= Received: by 10.54.52.27 with SMTP id z27mr130440wrz; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:27:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.73.11 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:27:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5627053705072618273aca3cb6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:27:46 -0500 From: Corey Brune To: Wojciech Puchar In-Reply-To: <20050727001937.U63965@chylonia.3miasto.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050727001937.U63965@chylonia.3miasto.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MAXPHYS and MAXBSIZE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Corey Brune List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:27:47 -0000 According to sys/param.h: MAXPHYS - max raw I/O transfer size MAXBSIZE - Filesystems are made out of blocks of at most MAXBSIZE bytes per block. MAXBSIZE may be made larger without effecting any existing filesystems as long as it does not exceed MAXPH= YS, and may be made smaller at the risk of not being able to use filesystems which require a block size exceeding MAXBSIZE. On 7/26/05, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > what is the difference between this 2 compile time defines? >=20 >=20 > is it possible to set it up higher? (something like 0.5MB for modern disk= s > make sense) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 01:33:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2CBF16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:33:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C86943D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:33:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so69444wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:33:43 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=XnXAwmVS+YLXbfPkzBnDP/2llygaK7/9jcfM/nnG+zpEnC96MvvH/rarMEhhh7AeIq51czpqHczRml5221rTzUZguRZZhJ6sGUl3VQlSowVn0SF80lrKRvSToOp+d8X7rjF85n5OMU24wazCj3s5sGAFAANyxA7062wl5fPz2+k= Received: by 10.54.56.5 with SMTP id e5mr139624wra; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:33:43 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: FreeBSD - Questions In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <44ek9lnvm8.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:33:45 -0000 > > > > > Is the new ATA RAID stuff, metadata something, going to be backpo= rted > > > > > to 5.x? I'm trying setup a RAID 1 mirror with Intel ICH5R / Adapt= ec > > > > > HostRAID but it looks like it's not supported in 5.x > > > > Search for messages about that. SOS@ has discussed it quite a bit, if > > I recall correctly. > > > > > > One more thing... Will FreeBSD 5.4 kernel modules work under 6.x? > > >=20 > Yes I just found that out when I tried to load the Highpoint RAID > driver on FreeBSD 6, the system panics very early in the boot process. > This means that FreeBSD 6 is completely out of the question for this > system and I really did not want to run 6.x anyways, I'm migrating a > production 5.4 server to this new hardware. >=20 > What is SOS@? and where can I read the discussions about sata RAID > problems? I seem to have two options for this server: > (1) Get the ICH5R / Adaptec HostRAID working with 5.4 (as device ar0, ad4= + ad6) > (2) Find a (cheap) SATA RAID 1 card that is supported by the ar / ata > device in 5.4. >=20 > The problem with (2) is that I can't find any cheap (less then $60 > USD) SATA RAID 1 cards that will work with device ar. I'm going to > post this problem to a new thread. >=20 SOS@, Are you are referring to the ATA-mkIII patch set by S=F8ren Schmidt? Is this the most current place to find this patch set?: http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ATA/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 01:44:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9956016A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:44:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tbartus@sbcglobal.net) Received: from smtp101.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp101.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36CD643D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:44:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tbartus@sbcglobal.net) Received: (qmail 16604 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2005 01:44:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO home0qg63jlfww) (tbartus@sbcglobal.net@70.240.172.13 with login) by smtp101.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Jul 2005 01:44:45 -0000 Message-ID: <000e01c5924c$c40b4590$6401a8c0@home0qg63jlfww> From: "Tommy Barus" To: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:44:42 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000A_01C59222.D95A14F0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: disabling system boot text X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:44:46 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C59222.D95A14F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm trying to disable, change, or hide the text displayed or outputted = to the screen as the system boots. I have set up a machine with no = monitor, nor keyboard, and I connect to the device via the serial = interface. My goal is to create an embedded device, on which the user = will to connect via the serial port and go directly to the user/login = prompt.=20 =20 I'm a little new to FreeBSD and I could not find any documentation that = will help me do this. To avoid some of the confusion about the text I'm = talking about, I have attached a sample of the display I would like to = change or disable (and the text that follows). Any help on this matter would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Tommy Bartus ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C59222.D95A14F0 Content-Type: text/plain; name="FreeBSDboot.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="FreeBSDboot.txt" =DA=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4= =C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=BF =B3 =B3 =B3 =B3 , , =B3 =B3 /( = )` =B3 Welcome to FreeBSD! =B3 \ \___ / = | =B3 =B3 /- _ `-/ = ' =B3 =B3 (/\/ \ \ = /\ =B3 1. Boot FreeBSD [default] =B3 / / | ` = \ =B3 2. Boot FreeBSD with ACPI enabled =B3 O O ) / = | =B3 3. Boot FreeBSD in Safe Mode =B3 `-^--'`< = ' =B3 4. Boot FreeBSD in single user mode =B3 (_.) _ ) = / =B3 5. Boot FreeBSD with verbose logging =B3 `.___/` / =B3 6. Escape to loader prompt =B3 `-----' / =B3 7. Boot FreeBSD with USB keyboard =B3 <----. __ / __ \ =B3 8. Reboot =B3 = <----|=3D=3D=3D=3DO)))=3D=3D) \) /=3D=3D=3D=3D =B3 =B3 <----' `--' `.__,' \ =B3 =B3 | | =B3 =B3 \ / = /\ =B3 Select option, [Enter] for default =B3 ______( (_ / = \______/ =B3 or [Space] to pause timer 4 =B3 ,' ,-----' | = =C0=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4= =C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=D9 = `--{__________) ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C59222.D95A14F0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 01:53:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C3716A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:53:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thibautlelevier@yahoo.fr) Received: from smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B52543D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:53:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thibautlelevier@yahoo.fr) Received: (qmail 16770 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2005 01:53:45 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.fr; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=g45mX5o4F8cY0yTPDR/d+5T7fw6FG+qib1IzXtrnV6EToj3oLU1PoTmvUybRATp/Tcy0Tul0/1H0EKSJx2ah05RbjnBIFFXanbeTkebg0iG0VibXAtAsjWTjZhcceD1exCPp8vRkMzIsO95qI5BvKuvmW8VoX8Ww7uzKSGiLlLM= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.10?) (thibautlelevier@83.195.154.183 with plain) by smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Jul 2005 01:53:44 -0000 Message-ID: <42E597AD.7020100@yahoo.fr> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:53:49 +0200 From: thibautlelevier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: probleme lors de l'installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:53:47 -0000 bonjours je vous contact car je rencontre un probleme lors de l'instalation j'ai partitionner le disque dur comme decrit dans le guide d'installation et après le message: User Confirmation Requested ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last Chance! Are you SURE you want to continue the installation? If you're running this on a disk with data you wish to save then WE STRONGLY ENCOURAGE YOU TO MAKE PROPER BACKUPS before proceeding! We can take no responsibility for lost disk contents! [ Yes ] No ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- j'obtient un message du genre: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Unable to find device node for /dev/ad0s1b in /dev! The creation of file systems will be abroted. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ c'est donc que j'ai mal fait quelque chose pourier vous m'aider et me dire ou je me suis tromper, ou reprendre et quoi faire? merci ___________________________________________________________________________ Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 02:19:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CDF716A41F; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:19:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it) Received: from vsmtp2.tin.it (vsmtp2alice.tin.it [212.216.176.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1203843D4C; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:19:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it) Received: from workstation (80.181.63.10) by vsmtp2.tin.it (7.2.060.1) id 42E65EE60003A8DB; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:19:19 +0200 Message-ID: <007b01c59251$925c5ca0$98edfea9@workstation> From: ".VWV." To: , , Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:19:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Cc: Subject: certance DAT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:19:22 -0000 Salve. I would like to know, if the following product can be used, in order to make tape dumps or tape tars with the FreeBSD 4.x. http://www.certance.com/products/dds-dat/dat72/CD72LWH-SS Thanks as always - please CC me - VITTORI From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 03:04:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6878816A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:04:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8E243D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:04:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.246.232] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A99F3D2E00EA; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:03:59 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6R34lIG032814; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:04:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6R34flg032813; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:04:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: Lane References: <20050726183029.M97284@neptune.atopia.net> <200507262019.25060.lane@joeandlane.com> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:04:41 -0700 In-Reply-To: <200507262019.25060.lane@joeandlane.com> (lane@joeandlane.com's message of "Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:19:24 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cat /dev/urandom X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:04:05 -0000 Lane writes: > I think the backticks (and shell variables) actually send the output to a > pipe, not the screen. I don't know why you said either part of that. I didn't imply the latter and AFAIK the former is untrue (unless you ask the shell to send their output to a pipe); they "send" their command output (or variable value) to the shell as it does command and variable subsitution on your shell command line. Read "Command Substitution" in the "sh" manpage. I suppose there might be pipes involved in the shell innerds, but it's not useful to think about them. The output of the backticks, etc., becomes a part of the post-subsitution command input to the shell. The shell might or might not then send some of it to the screen, or run a command that outputs to the screen, depending upon what the command is. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 03:08:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D5916A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:08:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john@day-light.com) Received: from joseph.day-light.net (gabriel.day-light.net [209.145.160.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388FB43D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:08:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john@day-light.com) Received: from w1 (unknown [10.1.5.36]) by joseph.day-light.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C75B4F3E2; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:08:02 -0500 (CDT) From: "John Brooks" To: "Tommy Barus" , Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:08:02 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <000e01c5924c$c40b4590$6401a8c0@home0qg63jlfww> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: disabling system boot text X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: john@day-light.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:08:03 -0000 # echo 'beastie_disable="YES"' >> /boot/loader.conf -- John Brooks john@day-light.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Tommy Barus > Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 8:45 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: disabling system boot text > > > I'm trying to disable, change, or hide the text displayed or > outputted to the screen as the system boots. I have set up a > machine with no monitor, nor keyboard, and I connect to the > device via the serial interface. My goal is to create an embedded > device, on which the user will to connect via the serial port and > go directly to the user/login prompt. > > > > I'm a little new to FreeBSD and I could not find any > documentation that will help me do this. To avoid some of the > confusion about the text I'm talking about, I have attached a > sample of the display I would like to change or disable (and the > text that follows). > > > > Any help on this matter would be greatly appreciated. > > > > Regards, > > > > Tommy Bartus > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 03:17:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F47916A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:17:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deslay@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A9343D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:17:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deslay@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i32so77485wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:17:32 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=oN5NGM3I3YIvwcEHmv0zL4V5QkQvvRR1NKgZ9rErnEUhn06yIAdOHCRd6sbVRk/svl/r5e2+XvoXWZ1ZMxMpX1J0wit3TO7b0HEXHFfj50QQA9v8HhvC9W3ZFGXv2KdNAMiOOk3RZs1dXu3jeRE0J+zQ0A4/r8sK6xyI5rMub1w= Received: by 10.54.143.10 with SMTP id q10mr172024wrd; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:17:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.41.20 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:17:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:17:31 +0800 From: Deslay To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: I got my vsftpd core dumped. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Deslay List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:17:33 -0000 Hello guys, i always got my vsftpd core dumped and i have no idea why is that happening all the time... There 's some informations below. www# tail /var/log/messages Jul 27 11:07:59 www kernel: pid 28994 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 11 Jul 27 11:08:00 www kernel: pid 28988 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 11 Jul 27 11:08:01 www kernel: pid 28987 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 11 Jul 27 11:08:02 www kernel: pid 28986 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 11 Jul 27 11:08:04 www kernel: pid 28985 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 11 Jul 27 11:08:05 www kernel: pid 28984 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 11 Jul 27 11:08:20 www kernel: pid 29017 (vsftpd), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) Jul 27 11:08:24 www kernel: pid 28996 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 11 Jul 27 11:08:26 www kernel: pid 29041 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 11 Jul 27 11:08:40 www kernel: pid 28990 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 11 www# pkg_info | grep vsftp vsftpd-2.0.3 A FTP daemon that aims to be "very secure" www#=20 Thanks for reading guys. --=20 ---------------------------------------------- God Bless You ---------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 03:17:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629B116A434 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:17:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13B743D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:17:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA3B5E33; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:17:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54279-08; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:17:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-54-113.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.54.113]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A99A5D1F; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:17:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42E6FCC5.8070309@mac.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:17:25 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ".VWV." References: <007b01c59251$925c5ca0$98edfea9@workstation> In-Reply-To: <007b01c59251$925c5ca0$98edfea9@workstation> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: certance DAT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:17:39 -0000 [ ...crossposting trimmed... ] .VWV. wrote: > I would like to know, if the following product can be used, in order to > make tape dumps or tape tars with the FreeBSD 4.x. > > http://www.certance.com/products/dds-dat/dat72/CD72LWH-SS Most probably. I've a Dell 2850 using a very similiar Seagate DAT72 tape drive, which dmesg claims as: sa0 at amr0 bus 1 target 6 lun 0 sa0: Removable Sequential Access SCSI-3 device ...and this works just fine with dump & tar via /dev/nsa0. I'd be happier if it was a DLT or LTO/Ultrium tape system, though. Note that I'm only getting about 2.5-3 MB/s effective transfer rates to it via: DUMPARGS="-0acLu -b 64 -C 24 -f /dev/nsa0" ...so it's not exactly super-zippy, either. Hmm, is it just me, or are the following numbers significantly low for a RAID-1 of two 10K RPM U320 SCSI disks...? /dev/amrd1 512 # sectorsize 73274490880 # mediasize in bytes (68G) 143114240 # mediasize in sectors 8908 # Cylinders according to firmware. 255 # Heads according to firmware. 63 # Sectors according to firmware. Seek times: Full stroke: 250 iter in 1.824059 sec = 7.296 msec Half stroke: 250 iter in 1.805398 sec = 7.222 msec Quarter stroke: 500 iter in 4.254147 sec = 8.508 msec Short forward: 400 iter in 2.821081 sec = 7.053 msec Short backward: 400 iter in 2.860203 sec = 7.151 msec Seq outer: 2048 iter in 8.821875 sec = 4.308 msec Seq inner: 2048 iter in 9.006505 sec = 4.398 msec Transfer rates: outside: 102400 kbytes in 9.242111 sec = 11080 kbytes/sec middle: 102400 kbytes in 9.230325 sec = 11094 kbytes/sec inside: 102400 kbytes in 10.779231 sec = 9500 kbytes/sec [ This is running RELENG_5_4... ] -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 03:28:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E07A616A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:28:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3A743D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:28:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B3B5DD2; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:28:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54279-10; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:28:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-54-113.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.54.113]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC2D5CEA; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:28:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42E6FF4E.2080206@mac.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:28:14 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Deslay References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I got my vsftpd core dumped. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:28:26 -0000 Deslay wrote: > Hello guys, > i always got my vsftpd core dumped and i have no idea why is that > happening all the time... > There 's some informations below. [ ...multiple sig11's deleted... ] Most probably a hardware problem like inadequate cooling or bad memory. Run memtest.org's checker or the memtest port overnight, and check whether your fans are working and adequate. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 04:07:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05A516A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:07:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lramos3@satx.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.texas.rr.com (ms-smtp-02.texas.rr.com [24.93.47.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C7043D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:07:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lramos3@satx.rr.com) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (cpe-66-69-40-1.satx.res.rr.com [66.69.40.1]) by ms-smtp-02-eri0.texas.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id j6R473e1028895 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:07:03 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <42E70863.2070803@satx.rr.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:06:59 -0500 From: luis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041016 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Cc: Subject: DELL SC 1420 Server, failed 5.4 installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:07:06 -0000 I recently bought a Dell SC 1420 server, single Xeon 2.8GhZ CPU, 512MB memory, WD 40GB SATA drive, embedded dual channel SATA controller and so far have failed to install FreeBSD. I have tried 5.4, 5.3, 4.4 and after recognizing the drive installation has always stopped at "Waiting 15 secs for scsi drives to settle". I even tried Mandrake 10 and it stalls on hard disk driver installation. I then disconnected the SATA drive, connected an IDE drive and the system still halted at the same spot. I have tried to load the aac module but a message early in the boot process states that it was not initialized. I have done a search in google, WD's website, FreeBSD mailing lists and so far no luck. What other information do I need to gather in order to solve this problem? As a last resort I tried and installed succesfully Windows 98. Thank you very much for your help. Luis From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 04:17:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5420816A428 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:17:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342DD44023 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:48:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1DxcuE-0007Fm-Kh for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:48:30 -0400 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6R3ueKS004714 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:56:40 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j6R3udi9004713 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:56:39 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:56:38 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20050726183029.M97284@neptune.atopia.net> <200507262019.25060.lane@joeandlane.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507262256.39161.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79e826e23bd04d5eaddb0a22a140385819350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: cat /dev/urandom X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:17:51 -0000 On Tuesday 26 July 2005 22:04, you wrote: > Lane writes: > > I think the backticks (and shell variables) actually send the output to a > > pipe, not the screen. > > I don't know why you said either part of that. I didn't imply the > latter and AFAIK the former is untrue (unless you ask the shell to > send their output to a pipe); they "send" their command output > (or variable value) to the shell as it does command and variable > subsitution on your shell command line. Read "Command Substitution" > in the "sh" manpage. I suppose there might be pipes involved in the > shell innerds, but it's not useful to think about them. The output of > the backticks, etc., becomes a part of the post-subsitution command > input to the shell. The shell might or might not then send some of it > to the screen, or run a command that outputs to the screen, depending > upon what the command is. Hmmm ... yeah, that seems right. Sorry I mentioned "pipe" ... I guess I was thinking mostly about how someone had said the output was sent to the screen ... and after I picked myself off the floor from that one I just typed in haste. Not that the output never goes to the screen, of course. It just seemed like the guy was speaking all in terms of screens, and I knew that my experience had that output usually going somewhere other than the screen ... mostly to a pipe. Just typed too soon, and didn't proof, I guess. I hope no harm has been done. For anyone listening .... don't type `cat /dev/urandom` because the results are, as they say, "undefined," and potentially (although probably remotely) destructive. lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 04:23:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D132016A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:23:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F3F43D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:23:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6R4Nbtm018874 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:23:38 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050726211444.18e82a00@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:19:36 -0700 To: Chuck Swiger , ".VWV." From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <42E6FCC5.8070309@mac.com> References: <007b01c59251$925c5ca0$98edfea9@workstation> <42E6FCC5.8070309@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: certance DAT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:23:39 -0000 At 08:17 PM 7/26/2005, Chuck Swiger wrote: ...so it's not exactly super-zippy, either. Hmm, is it just me, or are the following numbers significantly low for a RAID-1 of two 10K RPM U320 SCSI disks...? >/dev/amrd1 > 512 # sectorsize > 73274490880 # mediasize in bytes (68G) > 143114240 # mediasize in sectors > 8908 # Cylinders according to firmware. > 255 # Heads according to firmware. > 63 # Sectors according to firmware. > >Seek times: > Full stroke: 250 iter in 1.824059 sec = 7.296 msec > Half stroke: 250 iter in 1.805398 sec = 7.222 msec > Quarter stroke: 500 iter in 4.254147 sec = 8.508 msec > Short forward: 400 iter in 2.821081 sec = 7.053 msec > Short backward: 400 iter in 2.860203 sec = 7.151 msec > Seq outer: 2048 iter in 8.821875 sec = 4.308 msec > Seq inner: 2048 iter in 9.006505 sec = 4.398 msec >Transfer rates: > outside: 102400 kbytes in 9.242111 sec = 11080 kbytes/sec > middle: 102400 kbytes in 9.230325 sec = 11094 kbytes/sec > inside: 102400 kbytes in 10.779231 sec = 9500 kbytes/sec > >[ This is running RELENG_5_4... ] I would have expected the transfer rates to be about twice what they're listed as here. Though I don't know how you measured them. If you want to see something interesting, create a ufs1 file system on the same raid 1 using FreeBSD 4.x. Then mount it in 5.x and do your test for transfer rates. Compare that to either ufs1 or ufs2 on the same raid 1 as created by 5.4. The results are very interesting. -Glenn >-- >-Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 04:36:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DCC16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:36:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1089143D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:35:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.216] (c-24-1-232-64.hsd1.tx.comcast.net[24.1.232.64]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20050727043557012009sf5re>; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:35:57 +0000 Message-ID: <42E70F2C.7000209@computer.org> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:35:56 -0500 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050721) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Andrew P." References: <200507261631.45751.ringworm01@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:36:00 -0000 Andrew P. wrote: > On 7/27/05, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > >>On Tuesday 26 July 2005 16:00, Andrew P. wrote: >> >>>Hello all! >>> >>>I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95 >>>workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cable. >>>I am now able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between all kinds of Windows >>>2000/XP machines with all kinds of cheapest 100Mbit ethernet hardware. >>> >>>But I have never ever exceeded 8-9Mbytes/s between a Windows machine >>>and a FreeBSD box - _never_. Be it Samba, different ftp/http servers, FWIW... I recently had reason to investigate a network's performance. I was able to consistently get ~95% throughput from windows machines to FreeBSD boxes. I was using iperf (there is a WinX version of iperf as well) and chargen for testing. All PCs were old, and generally using cheap onboard NICs Might try tools specifically geared towards throughput testing. Various protocols have varying amounts of overhead. Tools with throughput testing in mind obviously have overhead minimized. Just my .02 cents. >>>different FreeBSD versions (4.x/5.x), with ipfw enabled or disabled, >>>etc., - the speed always hovers around 7-8Mb/s. I know it's not >>>critical, I know I should've upgraded to Gigabit hardware long ago, >>>but is there something wrong? >>> >>>I tried different linux distros, but they all seem to be even slower. >>>Wazzup?.. >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Andrew P. >> >>Here is the "ifconfig" output from a machine that has one nic set at >>10Mbit/half duplex and one at 100Mbit full duplex. how does it compare with >>your system? >> >>xl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >> options=1 >> inet6 fe80::210:4bff:fe70:4fb0%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 >> inet 71.102.0.97 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 71.102.0.255 >> ether 00:10:4b:70:4f:b0 >> media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP) .02 more cents..... Sometimes autoselect can work against you. Might try tying it down. >> status: active >>xl1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >> options=1 >> inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 >> inet6 fe80::210:4bff:fe0a:7cbc%xl1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 >> ether 00:10:4b:0a:7c:bc >> media: Ethernet 100baseTX >> status: active >> > > Well, if that really matters to you: > (freebsd 5.4) > vr0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > inet6 fe80::20f:3dff:feca:c494%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > inet 192.168.17.217 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.17.255 > ether 00:0f:3d:ca:c4:94 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=8 > inet 192.168.17.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.17.255 > ether 00:40:f4:8d:a7:f8 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > rl1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=8 > ether 00:40:f4:8d:9c:af > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > (fedora core 4) > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:81:2F:04:3E > inet addr:193.233.5.13 Bcast:193.233.5.63 Mask:255.255.255.192 > inet6 addr: fe80::2e0:81ff:fe2f:43e/64 Scope:Link > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:123946466 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:176380358 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > RX bytes:42267471987 (39.3 GiB) TX bytes:197116022761 (183.5 GiB) > Interrupt:177 > > Andrew P. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 04:59:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF55216A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:59:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from casey@phantombsd.org) Received: from phantombsd.org (dsl231-036-158.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.36.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A023A43D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:59:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from casey@phantombsd.org) Received: by phantombsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 6A00C102EFE; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:59:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (tomcat.phantombsd.org [192.168.1.6]) by phantombsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A37102C19; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:59:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42E71499.3030708@phantombsd.org> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:59:05 -0700 From: casey User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Andrew P." References: <25096.199.181.134.212.1122420447.squirrel@mail.phantombsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on eagle.phantombsd.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.4 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:59:08 -0000 Andrew P. wrote: >On 7/27/05, Casey Scott wrote: > > >>>Hello all! >>> >>>I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95 >>>workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cable. >>>I am now able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between all kinds of Windows >>>2000/XP machines with all kinds of cheapest 100Mbit ethernet hardware. >>> >>>But I have never ever exceeded 8-9Mbytes/s between a Windows machine >>>and a FreeBSD box - _never_. Be it Samba, different ftp/http servers, >>>different FreeBSD versions (4.x/5.x), with ipfw enabled or disabled, >>>etc., - the speed always hovers around 7-8Mb/s. I know it's not >>>critical, I know I should've upgraded to Gigabit hardware long ago, >>>but is there something wrong? >>> >>>I tried different linux distros, but they all seem to be even slower. >>>Wazzup?.. >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Andrew P. >>>_______________________________________________ >>>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >>> >>> >>Keep in mind that the Windows TCP/IP window buffers are not optimized the >>same way as FBSD or Linux. >> >>Casey >> >> >> >> >No doubt about that. Any thoughts about how to make them communicate >more effectively? > >Personally, I don't think it's just window buffers. I think the whole >darn TCP/IP stack misconfiguration plus maybe not perfect NIC drivers >are the reason for underperformance. I know that most of the real >"mistakes" must be on the Windows side, but that's not an excuse for >FreeBSD/Linux to not be at least 99%-Windows-networking-compatible. > >Andrew P. > > Your best would be google for that. Its been so long ago, that I don't remember anything useful. Sorry, Casey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 05:08:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE5F16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:08:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deslay@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D0443D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:08:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deslay@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i21so99271wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:08:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=R/U98vjuSUfIMusnSPRFaggZGPNmdgvtvO3AvLk19Y99STJ/Z5HqD/uCrqiqjTGowS23nKbEBux/ALeJID2zbs65Es3gsXcbM1dFycG+ut2UiyKIQqoX8KJzCxItxOzIYjCB5VAo6jr9X+SSDBF0iXns/XONo8Wg+Wxerto6ZL0= Received: by 10.54.13.59 with SMTP id 59mr203978wrm; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:08:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.41.20 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:08:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:08:30 +0800 From: Deslay To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Subject: Re: I got my vsftpd core dumped. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Deslay List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:08:32 -0000 The Machine is HP ML350G4=20 and i am sure that the cpu fan and memory is good so far. any ideas ? On 7/27/05, Deslay wrote: > Hello guys, > i always got my vsftpd core dumped and i have no idea why is that > happening all the time... > There 's some informations below. >=20 > www# tail /var/log/messages > Jul 27 11:07:59 www kernel: pid 28994 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 1= 1 > Jul 27 11:08:00 www kernel: pid 28988 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 1= 1 > Jul 27 11:08:01 www kernel: pid 28987 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 1= 1 > Jul 27 11:08:02 www kernel: pid 28986 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 1= 1 > Jul 27 11:08:04 www kernel: pid 28985 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 1= 1 > Jul 27 11:08:05 www kernel: pid 28984 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 1= 1 > Jul 27 11:08:20 www kernel: pid 29017 (vsftpd), uid 0: exited on > signal 11 (core dumped) > Jul 27 11:08:24 www kernel: pid 28996 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 1= 1 > Jul 27 11:08:26 www kernel: pid 29041 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 1= 1 > Jul 27 11:08:40 www kernel: pid 28990 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 1= 1 >=20 > www# pkg_info | grep vsftp > vsftpd-2.0.3 A FTP daemon that aims to be "very secure" > www#=20 >=20 > Thanks for reading guys. > --=20 > ---------------------------------------------- > God Bless You > ---------------------------------------------- >=20 --=20 ---------------------------------------------- God Bless You ---------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 05:13:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8EA16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:13:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C7E43D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:13:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.246.232] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A7EE573400A0; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:13:18 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6R5E67t034623 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:14:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6R5E1Rc034622; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:14:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3tll3tystl.l3t@mail.opusnet.com> <42E6E0B3.20409@mac.com> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:14:01 -0700 In-Reply-To: <42E6E0B3.20409@mac.com> (Chuck Swiger's message of "Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:17:39 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Can someone clarify ipfw's in/out/recv/xmit/via concepts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:13:22 -0000 >> Is my "de0" an "ifX" or an "if*"? >> ("exact name" or "device name") > > "de0" is an "ifX". > >> What would be an example of the other? > > "de*"? I guess that should have been obvious. I'll try to get the "exact name" and "device name" descriptions improved. >> Does "ipno" mean an numerical Internet address? >> (It's not mentioned elsewhere in the manpage.) > > I think so. Yes, the manpage IS referring to it as "IP address". Three down, several to go. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 05:41:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E03D16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:41:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE5143D55 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:41:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.246.232] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id AE8B43220146; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:41:31 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6R5gKJ7035083; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:42:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6R5gF6l035082; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:42:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: "Tommy Barus" References: <000e01c5924c$c40b4590$6401a8c0@home0qg63jlfww> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:42:15 -0700 In-Reply-To: <000e01c5924c$c40b4590$6401a8c0@home0qg63jlfww> (Tommy Barus's message of "Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:44:42 -0500") Message-ID: <5k1x5kztxk.x5k@mail.opusnet.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: disabling system boot text X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:41:36 -0000 "Tommy Barus" writes: > I'm trying to disable, change, or hide the text displayed or outputt I trimmed your paragraph to a 70-char width. Anyway, I'm not aware of any way to halt the output to the console. Settings in /etc/syslog.conf might eliminate some of it, but I doubt it'll do what you want. The "beastie=NO" thing sure won't. I'd look into setting up my /etc/ttys so that the serial line is not the "console". You might use syslog.conf to duplicate console messages to a file or something. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 06:16:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF9916A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:16:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lei.sun@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F12343D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:16:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lei.sun@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i5so109737wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:16:44 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=XTYYwWzlaJy7vEOqQxIRQpfxFr4THz9cBrQvauZwdMlXP3jXe+lJGDOWDPHl/73EdzrI61P+VjpXgrqyDwvvC3JEOpoDaYaqBwmNQ7pEBpjYfZjtHilMpSykTvPCyQiOXOdkE5ZFG7VaZ+WClIdheRsR/IMhjwhFEUM6R9Vp1Zg= Received: by 10.54.47.17 with SMTP id u17mr219298wru; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:16:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.6.70 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:16:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:16:43 -0700 From: Lei Sun To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: how to run 2 instance of memcached from rc.conf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lei Sun List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:16:45 -0000 Hi, I am trying to run 2 instance of memcached from rc.conf, but whenever I try to start it the second time, it tells me that the instance is already running. Please help... my rc.conf -------------------------------------------- defaultrouter=3D"192.168.0.1" hostname=3D"aphrodite.us.8po.com" ifconfig_em0=3D"inet 192.168.0.200 netmask 255.255.255.0" sshd_enable=3D"YES" mysql_enable=3D"YES" mysql_limits=3D"YES" apache_enable=3D"YES" memcached_enable=3D"YES" memcached_flags=3D"-m 1024 -l 127.0.0.1 -p 11211" ----------------------------------------------- my /usr/local/etc/rc.d/memcached.sh ---------------------------------------------- #!/bin/sh # # PROVIDE: memcached # REQUIRE: NETWORKING # # Add the following lines to /etc/rc.conf to run memcached: # # memcached_enable=3D"YES" # memcached_flags=3D"" # . /etc/rc.subr name=3D"memcached" rcvar=3D`set_rcvar` command=3D/usr/local/bin/memcached command_args=3D"-du nobody ${memcached_flags}" load_rc_config $name run_rc_command "$1" -------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 06:21:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A215C16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:21:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from server.absolute-media.de (server.absolute-media.de [213.239.231.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBBE843D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:21:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9123A8BEC4; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:21:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.absolute-media.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25981-08; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:21:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firewall.demig (p50839235.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.131.146.53]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64898AD22; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:21:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ws-ew-3 (ws-ew-3.w2kdemig [192.168.1.72]) by firewall.demig (8.13.4/8.13.1) with SMTP id j6R6I5MG067330; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:18:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) From: "Norbert Koch" To: , Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:18:06 +0200 Message-ID: <001701c59272$f3af34c0$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at absolute-media.de Cc: Subject: RE: sysctl deadmantimer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:21:44 -0000 > In the BSD/OS there is a kernel countdown counter that can be used > to reboot the machine in case of lock. It´s called deadmantimer. > I used to put a cron entry to preset this counter every 3 min, so > if it goes to zero the server is rebooted. > In the past it save me some times. > > Is there anything like this in Freebsd? Have a look at watchdogd(8). Only available under 5X and above. Norbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 06:35:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8470016A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:35:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dikshie@ppk.itb.ac.id) Received: from mx-itb.geoph.ITB.ac.id (mx7.ITB.ac.id [167.205.30.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A6A43D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:35:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dikshie@ppk.itb.ac.id) Received: from antivirus.itb.ac.id (antivirus.ITB.ac.id [167.205.108.137]) by mx-itb.geoph.ITB.ac.id (Postfix) with SMTP id D57F720B79 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:35:49 +0700 (WIT) Received: from ipv6.ppk.itb.ac.id (ipv6.ppk.itb.ac.id [167.205.30.228]) by mx-itb.geoph.ITB.ac.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA3320B28 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:35:49 +0700 (WIT) Received: by ipv6.ppk.itb.ac.id (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E0177114E7; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:34:58 +0700 (WIT) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:34:58 +0700 From: Dikshie To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050727063458.GA30227@ppk.itb.ac.id> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: (FreeBSD 6.0-BETA1 i386) X-Uptime: 1:30PM up 19:54, 3 users, load averages: 2.07, 2.02, 2.02 X-Organization: Pusat Penelitian Kelautan (PPK) X-Location: Labtek VI Building, Institute of Technology, Bandung, Indonesia X-Web-Site: http://ipv6.ppk.itb.ac.id/~dikshie X-Yahoo-ID: dikshie X-GnuPG-Key: http://ipv6.ppk.itb.ac.id/gpg/ X-FingerPrint: 19AC 2592 1394 6C96 BABB 9060 50B8 D244 88E3 B55D Cc: Subject: ***SPAM Level 2*** xorg weirdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:35:21 -0000 Dear All, because my laptop is Japanese laptop so I define keymap="jp.106" on /etc/rc.conf BUT when I do startx (using XORG 6.8.2) the keyboard layout back to default (generic english keyboard) ! How to keep keymap="jp.106" still valid on XORG ? regards, -dikshie- ~ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 06:47:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA9916A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:47:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441C343D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:47:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6R6lAbX021238 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:47:11 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050726233906.198d9de0@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:43:07 -0700 To: Lei Sun , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: how to run 2 instance of memcached from rc.conf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:47:12 -0000 At 11:16 PM 7/26/2005, Lei Sun wrote: >Hi, > >I am trying to run 2 instance of memcached from rc.conf, but whenever >I try to start it the second time, it tells me that the instance is >already running. > >Please help... According to the documentation at http://www.danga.com/memcached running more than one instance on the same machine is only helpful if you have more than 4GB of RAM. To load another instance, you just have to tell it to listen on a different port, or a different IP address (if the machine you're running it one has more than one IP). -Glenn >my rc.conf >-------------------------------------------- >defaultrouter="192.168.0.1" >hostname="aphrodite.us.8po.com" >ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.0.200 netmask 255.255.255.0" >sshd_enable="YES" >mysql_enable="YES" >mysql_limits="YES" >apache_enable="YES" >memcached_enable="YES" >memcached_flags="-m 1024 -l 127.0.0.1 -p 11211" >----------------------------------------------- > > >my /usr/local/etc/rc.d/memcached.sh >---------------------------------------------- >#!/bin/sh ># > ># PROVIDE: memcached ># REQUIRE: NETWORKING > ># ># Add the following lines to /etc/rc.conf to run memcached: ># ># memcached_enable="YES" ># memcached_flags="" ># >. /etc/rc.subr > >name="memcached" >rcvar=`set_rcvar` >command=/usr/local/bin/memcached >command_args="-du nobody ${memcached_flags}" > >load_rc_config $name >run_rc_command "$1" >-------------------------------------------------- >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 06:51:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F3E16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:51:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from server.absolute-media.de (server.absolute-media.de [213.239.231.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E08A43D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:51:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B8F8BC6A; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:51:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.absolute-media.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27773-04; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:51:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firewall.demig (p50839235.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.131.146.53]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045DB85991; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:51:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ws-ew-3 (ws-ew-3.w2kdemig [192.168.1.72]) by firewall.demig (8.13.4/8.13.1) with SMTP id j6R6mwFq068916; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:49:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) From: "Norbert Koch" To: "Nikolas Britton" , "FreeBSD - Questions" Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:49:11 +0200 Message-ID: <001901c59277$4bccbe80$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at absolute-media.de Cc: Subject: RE: FreeBSD 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:51:45 -0000 > Is it just me or is -O2 now the default for kernel builds? What about > -Os, safe to use? As I understand the gcc description, -Os is -O2 with options turned off that possibly lead to increased code size. So it should work. Norbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 06:51:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6475316A427 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:51:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from server.absolute-media.de (server.absolute-media.de [213.239.231.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E346A43D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:51:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C538BC6A; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:51:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.absolute-media.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27773-05; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:51:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firewall.demig (p50839235.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.131.146.53]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D388C532; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:51:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ws-ew-3 (ws-ew-3.w2kdemig [192.168.1.72]) by firewall.demig (8.13.4/8.13.1) with SMTP id j6R6mwFs068916; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:49:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) From: "Norbert Koch" To: "Nikolas Britton" , "=?iso-8859-1?B?S/Z2ZXNk4W4gR+Fib3I=?=" Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:49:24 +0200 Message-ID: <001a01c59277$535d15a0$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at absolute-media.de Cc: FreeBSD - Questions Subject: RE: FreeBSD 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:51:49 -0000 > As far as -O2 as the default for the kernel... I thought it was more > important to have a small kernel then a faster but fatter one. The > smaller the kernel the more you can put in L1,2, and 3 cache and the > smaller the program the less it needs to hit ram, swap, and hard disk? Just my opinion. I am not sure if, under realistic conditions, -O2 is better than -Os. Norbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 07:00:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F46C16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:00:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lei.sun@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2624443D55 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:59:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lei.sun@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so117960wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:59:59 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Wz1EeiHIj1N/qj78l2gXqZx33KImYR1p0whqjVe4BZPUJqwxGHgOluiZxUWw5r9Q6wvZFkIZFbDonRcbObq1nnhNeNY4ONB21eoi0D66gzwJv79Q5AxFz7qYehm3lWJN596L/1zPS023h+ycn4fXvjEEJxGZ+Sk4qI4CD31ASc0= Received: by 10.54.27.50 with SMTP id a50mr220619wra; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:59:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.6.70 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:59:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:59:59 -0700 From: Lei Sun To: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20050726233906.198d9de0@cobalt.antimatter.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <6.1.0.6.2.20050726233906.198d9de0@cobalt.antimatter.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to run 2 instance of memcached from rc.conf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lei Sun List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:00:00 -0000 Yeah, the tricky part is not to what to do, but how to do it. I know I need to configure 2 ip or 2 ports. As the memcached.sh is using run_rc_command, and somehow, even if when I am giving it 2 arguments with different port, it still can only start up 1 process instead of 2. So how do I use the same script to run 2 instance of memcached? Thanks in advance. Lei On 7/26/05, Glenn Dawson wrote: > At 11:16 PM 7/26/2005, Lei Sun wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I am trying to run 2 instance of memcached from rc.conf, but whenever > >I try to start it the second time, it tells me that the instance is > >already running. > > > >Please help... >=20 > According to the documentation at http://www.danga.com/memcached running > more than one instance on the same machine is only helpful if you have mo= re > than 4GB of RAM. >=20 > To load another instance, you just have to tell it to listen on a differe= nt > port, or a different IP address (if the machine you're running it one has > more than one IP). >=20 > -Glenn >=20 >=20 > >my rc.conf > >-------------------------------------------- > >defaultrouter=3D"192.168.0.1" > >hostname=3D"aphrodite.us.8po.com" > >ifconfig_em0=3D"inet 192.168.0.200 netmask 255.255.255.0" > >sshd_enable=3D"YES" > >mysql_enable=3D"YES" > >mysql_limits=3D"YES" > >apache_enable=3D"YES" > >memcached_enable=3D"YES" > >memcached_flags=3D"-m 1024 -l 127.0.0.1 -p 11211" > >----------------------------------------------- > > > > > >my /usr/local/etc/rc.d/memcached.sh > >---------------------------------------------- > >#!/bin/sh > ># > > > ># PROVIDE: memcached > ># REQUIRE: NETWORKING > > > ># > ># Add the following lines to /etc/rc.conf to run memcached: > ># > ># memcached_enable=3D"YES" > ># memcached_flags=3D"" > ># > >. /etc/rc.subr > > > >name=3D"memcached" > >rcvar=3D`set_rcvar` > >command=3D/usr/local/bin/memcached > >command_args=3D"-du nobody ${memcached_flags}" > > > >load_rc_config $name > >run_rc_command "$1" > >-------------------------------------------------- > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.= org" >=20 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 07:05:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A420B16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:05:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36CC243D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:05:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so175242rne for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:05:48 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ULXNmDtqD9QWmpz+N9eFXTCJYb6hGRQZxIgyjwwuZwUBBNdaJ32OymGsn6u5Ln3EKk2o5/PB/2Rv/Pt9Rmct96FbFk4tKLj0schx0/rcV254KXz7dU+4EYMCz3Golmbofu2WGpYRB0tBsln0H0DcXtm5uhndhfhaoIW84M8mzLk= Received: by 10.38.209.26 with SMTP id h26mr328981rng; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:05:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.101.41 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:05:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:05:48 +0900 From: Eric Kjeldergaard To: Richard Lupton In-Reply-To: <303718d9050725094456d67baf@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <303718d9050725094456d67baf@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Laptop mode for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eric Kjeldergaard List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:05:49 -0000 On 7/26/05, Richard Lupton wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I have an old NEC Versa LX laptop with a very noisy disk. Mostly from > the point of view of making it quieter, rather than saving power, I > would like to let the disk spin down in the same way as laptop_mode > does for linux. > I can set the standby time and power saving options for the disk using > ataidle, but the disk doesn't stay spun down for any length of time. > Does anyone know of an equivalent to laptop_mode, or alternatively the > appropriate sysctls to postpone disk access? >=20 AFAIK, one doesn't exist. Feel free to write one. Anyways, in a more productive manner...By disabling things that poll disk (cron, for instance), disabling access times (mount with noatime), and intelligent use of ramdisks, the disk can spend a lot of time spun down. --=20 If I write a signature, my emails will appear more personalised. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 07:07:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD29216A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:07:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maarfree@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492BB43D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:07:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maarfree@xs4all.nl) Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl (webmail7.xs4all.nl [194.109.22.167]) by smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6R77YXj095816 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:07:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from maarfree@xs4all.nl) Received: from 194.151.102.253 by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:07:35 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <11727.194.151.102.253.1122448055.squirrel@194.151.102.253> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:07:35 +0200 (CEST) From: "Maarten" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: sterminal or alternative X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: maarfree@xs4all.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:07:37 -0000 Is anyone aware if there have been efforts to port sterminal? If not, are there any ported alternatives which I have overlooked? Maarten From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 07:31:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C311F16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:31:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gbentley@uk2.net) Received: from webmailsmtp1.uk2net.com (mailout.uk2.net [83.170.69.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E8F543D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:31:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gbentley@uk2.net) Received: from [10.0.1.51] (helo=mailnew-1.uk2.net) by webmailsmtp1.uk2net.com with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DxgNl-00069A-Ob for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:31:13 +0100 Received: from 81.174.174.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user gbentley) by maxproxy1.uk2net.com with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:31:13 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <50914.81.174.174.115.1122449473.squirrel@maxproxy1.uk2net.com> In-Reply-To: <20050727043609.DF53E16A42F@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20050727043609.DF53E16A42F@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:31:13 +0100 (BST) From: "Graham Bentley" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again (Andrew P.) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:31:14 -0000 > "mistakes" must be on the Windows side, but that's > not an excuse for FreeBSD/Linux to not be at least > 99%-Windows-networking-compatible. Tridge Quote: Samba is Bug for Bug compatible with Windows. (Until M$ changes something ie tries to fix its own bugs and makes some others OR are new 'features' introduced deliberately ???) Any advice on tuning up TCP / IDE Disk IO / Samba on 5.4 would be interesting !!! Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 07:40:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1064816A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:40:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lei.sun@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8984843D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:40:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lei.sun@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so122852wra for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:40:19 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=af9TH1wJTarP3c7aRsG868RekDEkSwPcibINeqVfFw9QKATJoLWq1TWY8CpJjIcwg+rap6K+poILdQJ3BWZcJcLO1XFIJAUtI8ukPXG5R15AjmjIdL4oVEUtJWYIJJbpv3uGtCQXSrvZQUGYXisM221WpS7tIvzzRztQ4gXmEck= Received: by 10.54.47.69 with SMTP id u69mr227799wru; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:40:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.6.70 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:40:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:40:19 -0700 From: Lei Sun To: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20050727001634.1afcc400@cobalt.antimatter.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <6.1.0.6.2.20050726233906.198d9de0@cobalt.antimatter.net> <6.1.0.6.2.20050727001634.1afcc400@cobalt.antimatter.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to run 2 instance of memcached from rc.conf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lei Sun List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:40:21 -0000 I did try this approach... but no luck.=20 whenever I try to start the second one, it says the pid already exists.=20 I think is is because of run_rc_command in rc.subr, it somehow records down the pid somewhere... :( any other good ideas? Thanks Lei On 7/27/05, Glenn Dawson wrote: > At 11:59 PM 7/26/2005, you wrote: > >Yeah, the tricky part is not to what to do, but how to do it. I know I > >need to configure 2 ip or 2 ports. > > > >As the memcached.sh is using run_rc_command, and somehow, even if when > >I am giving it 2 arguments with different port, it still can only > >start up 1 process instead of 2. > > > >So how do I use the same script to run 2 instance of memcached? > > > >Thanks in advance. >=20 > There's probably other ways to do this, but this one works: >=20 > create a second script called memcached2.sh in /usr/local/etc/rc.d with t= he > following contents: >=20 > #!/bin/sh > # >=20 > # PROVIDE: memcached2 > # REQUIRE: NETWORKING >=20 > # > # Add the following lines to /etc/rc.conf to run memcached: > # > #memcached2_enable=3D"YES" > #memcached2_flags=3D"" > # > . /etc/rc.subr >=20 > name=3D"memcached2" > rcvar=3D`set_rcvar` > command=3D/usr/local/bin/memcached2 > command_args=3D"-du nobody ${memcached2_flags}" >=20 > load_rc_config $name > run_rc_command "$1" >=20 >=20 >=20 > Then, create a symlink that points memcached2 to memcachd: >=20 > ln -s /usr/local/bin/memcached /usr/local/bin/memcached2 >=20 >=20 > then, you can use two sets of variables in /etc/rc.conf like: >=20 > memcached_enable=3D"YES" > memcached_flags=3D"-m 2 -l 10.1.1.245 -p 11211" >=20 > memcached2_enable=3D"YES" > memcached2_flags=3D"-m 2 -l 10.1.1.245 -p 11212" >=20 >=20 > That worked for me on one of my test systems. >=20 > -Glenn >=20 >=20 > >Lei > > > >On 7/26/05, Glenn Dawson wrote: > > > At 11:16 PM 7/26/2005, Lei Sun wrote: > > > >Hi, > > > > > > > >I am trying to run 2 instance of memcached from rc.conf, but wheneve= r > > > >I try to start it the second time, it tells me that the instance is > > > >already running. > > > > > > > >Please help... > > > > > > According to the documentation at http://www.danga.com/memcached runn= ing > > > more than one instance on the same machine is only helpful if you hav= e more > > > than 4GB of RAM. > > > > > > To load another instance, you just have to tell it to listen on a dif= ferent > > > port, or a different IP address (if the machine you're running it one= has > > > more than one IP). > > > > > > -Glenn > > > > > > > > > >my rc.conf > > > >-------------------------------------------- > > > >defaultrouter=3D"192.168.0.1" > > > >hostname=3D"aphrodite.us.8po.com" > > > >ifconfig_em0=3D"inet 192.168.0.200 netmask 255.255.255.0" > > > >sshd_enable=3D"YES" > > > >mysql_enable=3D"YES" > > > >mysql_limits=3D"YES" > > > >apache_enable=3D"YES" > > > >memcached_enable=3D"YES" > > > >memcached_flags=3D"-m 1024 -l 127.0.0.1 -p 11211" > > > >----------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > >my /usr/local/etc/rc.d/memcached.sh > > > >---------------------------------------------- > > > >#!/bin/sh > > > ># > > > > > > > ># PROVIDE: memcached > > > ># REQUIRE: NETWORKING > > > > > > > ># > > > ># Add the following lines to /etc/rc.conf to run memcached: > > > ># > > > ># memcached_enable=3D"YES" > > > ># memcached_flags=3D"" > > > ># > > > >. /etc/rc.subr > > > > > > > >name=3D"memcached" > > > >rcvar=3D`set_rcvar` > > > >command=3D/usr/local/bin/memcached > > > >command_args=3D"-du nobody ${memcached_flags}" > > > > > > > >load_rc_config $name > > > >run_rc_command "$1" > > > >-------------------------------------------------- > > > >_______________________________________________ > > > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.= org" >=20 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 08:33:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72E916A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:33:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7E743D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:33:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i5so127043wra for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:33:04 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CgvQZRpMzkGi2VsN3U490cMrqMRnePW0D3fdQEKbtQn6IXGNvOTtFjaUlK7nqQNidVEKbWs6UoTMKTONymHZDeewpnY0ghNxCMS6wWXCEWdLA33fGAZF0zDmrcuzRs7k9n/q+lr7FXUpQzSKBONgRGvGXyZ21YKiO0hkBDwiWnE= Received: by 10.54.42.62 with SMTP id p62mr254814wrp; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:33:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:33:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:33:04 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: "Andrew P." In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:33:06 -0000 On 7/26/05, Andrew P. wrote: > Hello all! >=20 > I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95 > workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cable. > I am now able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between all kinds of Windows > 2000/XP machines with all kinds of cheapest 100Mbit ethernet hardware. How is it possible to get "11-12Mbytes/s" from 10Base2? Redo your math ( 2(20) * 10 / 8 ) and you get an absolute of 1.31MB/s for 10Mbit Ethernet. BUT this number has no meaning in the real world! The theoretical maximum data throughput for a 10Mbps Ethernet system is 9.744MB/s using 1518 byte frames. The last time I checked Microsoft could only break anti-trust laws, not physics. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 08:43:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E87116A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:43:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com) Received: from mx20.fujixerox.co.jp (mx20.fujixerox.co.jp [192.26.96.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F3743D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:43:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com) Received: from isvw20.fujixerox.co.jp ([129.249.27.140]) by mx20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6R8hqrc023327 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:43:52 +0900 (JST) Received: from ms20.fujixerox.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by isvw20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6R8hp8V021103 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:43:51 +0900 (JST) Received: from ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (ms1 [129.249.27.192]) by ms20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6R8hpeh018728 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:43:51 +0900 (JST) Received: from sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com ([13.198.8.73]) by ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (8.11.6p2a/3.7W) with ESMTP id j6R8hnm23914 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:43:49 +0900 (JST) Received: from mailhost.sgp.fujixerox.com by sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com with ESMTP id 97162491122453815; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:43:35 +0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B3DE81D938 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:43:28 +0800 (SGT) Received: from sess.xssc.sgp.xerox.com (unknown [13.198.33.122]) by imss.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFDF1D930; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:43:23 +0800 (SGT) From: Xu Qiang To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:46:44 +0800 X-Sent-Folder-Path: Sent Items X-Mailer: Oracle Connector for Outlook 9.0.4 60130 (9.0.2711) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20050727084323.4DFDF1D930@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> Subject: DNS settings in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:43:54 -0000 Hi, all: = Last time I asked you that why the machine can map the hostname to ip addre= ss without setting DNS Server in "/etc/rc.conf". = Now I remember that I have provided DNS ip address in the initial installin= g stage, where the installation wizard asked for me about the settings step= by step, in which I set the machine's hostname, ip address, domain, gatewa= y, subnet mask, and DNS server ip address. = Now, when I open the file "/etc/rc.conf", I found the machine's hostname, i= p address, subnet mask, domain, and gateway/router are all in it. = Yet, where is the DNS setting? If not in this file, which file does this se= tting reside in? P.S.: In solaris, I can use dos2unix to transfer txt file from DOS/Windows = format to Unix format, what is the corresponding command in FreeBSD? Thanks, = Xu Qiang From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 08:44:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F0F16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:44:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB86343D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:44:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so130467wra for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:44:52 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DNEdmsDfPP2F/fTqpzquK3dv/dXR8dw2/ENM6EPb6e9x8Nwz36dSnaoITC0OYktw6cG+sndRNJ1Y2y5r2GErGFQJgRc/0o0CXdjPWeC03eWPLkMbt1XOoET20+zSLOCkSVjSxKddBBBa58ImfpfwywxP/4Y7QX6e1sOyB4Jhw5I= Received: by 10.54.129.7 with SMTP id b7mr250494wrd; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:44:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:44:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:44:52 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: Graham Bentley In-Reply-To: <50914.81.174.174.115.1122449473.squirrel@maxproxy1.uk2net.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050727043609.DF53E16A42F@hub.freebsd.org> <50914.81.174.174.115.1122449473.squirrel@maxproxy1.uk2net.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again (Andrew P.) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:44:54 -0000 On 7/27/05, Graham Bentley wrote: > > "mistakes" must be on the Windows side, but that's > > not an excuse for FreeBSD/Linux to not be at least > > 99%-Windows-networking-compatible. >=20 > Tridge Quote: Samba is Bug for Bug compatible > with Windows. >=20 > (Until M$ changes something ie tries to fix its own bugs > and makes some others OR are new 'features' introduced > deliberately ???) >=20 > Any advice on tuning up TCP / IDE Disk IO / Samba on 5.4 > would be interesting !!! >=20 I wish you could run Netware on top of BSD... I think Novell made a very smart move adopting Linux into it's portfolio. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 08:51:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E436A16A431 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:51:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9348F43D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:51:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6R8ppvh023313 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:51:51 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050727014549.038b9c50@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:47:45 -0700 To: Xu Qiang , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <20050727084323.4DFDF1D930@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> References: <20050727084323.4DFDF1D930@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: DNS settings in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:51:53 -0000 At 01:46 AM 7/27/2005, Xu Qiang wrote: >Hi, all: > >Last time I asked you that why the machine can map the hostname to ip >address without setting DNS Server in "/etc/rc.conf". > >Now I remember that I have provided DNS ip address in the initial >installing stage, where the installation wizard asked for me about the >settings step by step, in which I set the machine's hostname, ip address, >domain, gateway, subnet mask, and DNS server ip address. > >Now, when I open the file "/etc/rc.conf", I found the machine's hostname, >ip address, subnet mask, domain, and gateway/router are all in it. > >Yet, where is the DNS setting? If not in this file, which file does this >setting reside in? /etc/resolv.conf >P.S.: In solaris, I can use dos2unix to transfer txt file from DOS/Windows >format to Unix format, what is the corresponding command in FreeBSD? Install the dosunix port, It's in /usr/ports/converters/dosunix -Glenn >Thanks, >Xu Qiang > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 08:58:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DDA316A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:58:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681BF43D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:58:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i5so130028wra for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:58:07 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=XITq9PHK8EU6v0wbegava+bPJJMxUmp7sK1DSGW3XUasCykHP29ZOPSeVf/Xs5WEuIlksD/qp3NNm06qTxNKB+v63Lers7Z1+URiA39/4CmxdHrp4BQshlG/B101pQTGFCX/vluFRjVkeb4vbAcMQHmR2UN+oq2xW/gPpeHTTXU= Received: by 10.54.47.17 with SMTP id u17mr257948wru; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:58:07 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: "Andrew P." In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:58:09 -0000 On 7/27/05, Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 7/26/05, Andrew P. wrote: > > Hello all! > > > > I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95 > > workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cable. > > I am now able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between all kinds of Windows > > 2000/XP machines with all kinds of cheapest 100Mbit ethernet hardware. >=20 > How is it possible to get "11-12Mbytes/s" from 10Base2? Redo your math > ( 2(20) * 10 / 8 ) and you get an absolute of 1.31MB/s for 10Mbit > Ethernet. BUT this number has no meaning in the real world! The > theoretical maximum data throughput for a 10Mbps Ethernet system is > 9.744MB/s using 1518 byte frames. The last time I checked Microsoft > could only break anti-trust laws, not physics. >=20 hahaha... that should have been 974KB/s, even I fsck up, though I'm under the influence of butt kickin sleep meds From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 09:00:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A0716A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:00:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA9143D79 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:00:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so132286wra for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:00:39 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=XCrnL9heYN+blSF5L8OsMXsxoW+J8dKdkUdaI3RXPi2cN0Y0lvVKp8CjeDaD0X1bxr4wE5E8NGslcSu/XstnUB5U732ZryaDRPTdCnnH9EvlAfNajSevZAM1Hy+ViJNc8NlKgSLrVDI2k8otTK4W9FMUorL+zHPiL1f3+x+/Vp0= Received: by 10.54.54.60 with SMTP id c60mr245927wra; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:00:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:00:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:00:39 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: Xu Qiang In-Reply-To: <20050727084323.4DFDF1D930@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050727084323.4DFDF1D930@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DNS settings in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:00:53 -0000 On 7/27/05, Xu Qiang wrote: > Hi, all: >=20 > Last time I asked you that why the machine can map the hostname to ip add= ress without setting DNS Server in "/etc/rc.conf". >=20 > Now I remember that I have provided DNS ip address in the initial install= ing stage, where the installation wizard asked for me about the settings st= ep by step, in which I set the machine's hostname, ip address, domain, gate= way, subnet mask, and DNS server ip address. >=20 > Now, when I open the file "/etc/rc.conf", I found the machine's hostname,= ip address, subnet mask, domain, and gateway/router are all in it. >=20 > Yet, where is the DNS setting? If not in this file, which file does this = setting reside in? >=20 > P.S.: In solaris, I can use dos2unix to transfer txt file from DOS/Window= s format to Unix format, what is the corresponding command in FreeBSD? Try /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/hosts From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 09:01:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4DB16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:01:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from speechpro.com (speech-tech-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.190.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E2443D7E for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:01:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from sysadm.stc ([192.168.2.26]) by s1.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD)) id 1Dxhm7-000Dai-JF for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:00:27 +0400 Message-ID: <42E74D3F.3000409@speechpro.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:00:47 +0400 From: Igor Robul User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050518) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050727063458.GA30227@ppk.itb.ac.id> In-Reply-To: <20050727063458.GA30227@ppk.itb.ac.id> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archived: Yes Subject: Re: xorg keyboard layout X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:01:22 -0000 Dikshie wrote: >Dear All, >because my laptop is Japanese laptop so I define >keymap="jp.106" on /etc/rc.conf >BUT when I do startx (using XORG 6.8.2) >the keyboard layout back to default (generic english keyboard) ! > >How to keep keymap="jp.106" still valid on XORG ? > > Console keyboard and X11 keyboard are configured in different places. To configure Xorg keyboard look at manual page for xorg.cfg, or use xorgcfg utility, but make backup of your existing xorg.cfg. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 09:02:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 278C516A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:02:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from server.absolute-media.de (server.absolute-media.de [213.239.231.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E89443D97 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:01:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592B88C6E5; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:01:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.absolute-media.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02455-10; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:01:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firewall.demig (p50839235.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.131.146.53]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8278B340; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:01:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ws-ew-3 (ws-ew-3.w2kdemig [192.168.1.72]) by firewall.demig (8.13.4/8.13.1) with SMTP id j6R907Xe075602; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:00:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) From: "Norbert Koch" To: "Xu Qiang" , Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:00:07 +0200 Message-ID: <000001c59289$961bb420$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <20050727084323.4DFDF1D930@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at absolute-media.de Cc: Subject: RE: DNS settings in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:02:11 -0000 > Yet, where is the DNS setting? If not in this file, which file > does this setting reside in? > /etc/resolv.conf > P.S.: In solaris, I can use dos2unix to transfer txt file from > DOS/Windows format to Unix format, what is the corresponding > command in FreeBSD? The same. Just install it from ports. Norbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 09:05:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F9C16A420 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:05:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com) Received: from mx20.fujixerox.co.jp (mx20.fujixerox.co.jp [192.26.96.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7465B43DD4 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:05:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com) Received: from isvw20.fujixerox.co.jp ([129.249.27.140]) by mx20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6R9545x028655; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:05:04 +0900 (JST) Received: from ms20.fujixerox.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by isvw20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6R9531f000457; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:05:03 +0900 (JST) Received: from ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (ms1 [129.249.27.192]) by ms20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6R9533W000888; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:05:03 +0900 (JST) Received: from sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com ([13.198.8.73]) by ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (8.11.6p2a/3.7W) with ESMTP id j6R952m26761; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:05:02 +0900 (JST) Received: from mailhost.sgp.fujixerox.com by sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com with ESMTP id 97199521122455101; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:05:01 +0800 Received: from imss.sgp.fujixerox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B21D1D93C; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:04:54 +0800 (SGT) Received: from sess.xssc.sgp.xerox.com (unknown [13.198.33.122]) by imss.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B4E1D936; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:04:54 +0800 (SGT) From: Xu Qiang To: Glenn Dawson , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:08:15 +0800 X-Sent-Folder-Path: Sent Items X-Mailer: Oracle Connector for Outlook 9.0.4 60130 (9.0.2711) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20050727090454.69B4E1D936@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> Cc: Subject: RE: DNS settings in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:05:58 -0000 Glenn Dawson wrote: > At 01:46 AM 7/27/2005, Xu Qiang wrote: >> Hi, all: >> = >> Last time I asked you that why the machine can map the hostname to ip >> address without setting DNS Server in "/etc/rc.conf". >> = >> Now I remember that I have provided DNS ip address in the initial >> installing stage, where the installation wizard asked for me about >> the settings step by step, in which I set the machine's hostname, ip >> address, domain, gateway, subnet mask, and DNS server ip address. >> = >> Now, when I open the file "/etc/rc.conf", I found the machine's >> hostname, ip address, subnet mask, domain, and gateway/router are >> all in it. = >> = >> Yet, where is the DNS setting? If not in this file, which file does >> this setting reside in? > = > /etc/resolv.conf > = > = >> P.S.: In solaris, I can use dos2unix to transfer txt file from >> DOS/Windows format to Unix format, what is the corresponding command >> in FreeBSD? = > = > Install the dosunix port, It's in /usr/ports/converters/dosunix > = > -Glenn Got it, thank you! Regards, Xu Qiang From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 09:07:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D416016A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:07:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jaapb@kerguelen.org) Received: from societe.kerguelen.org (catv9079.extern.kun.nl [131.174.119.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8FA43DA9 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:06:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jaapb@kerguelen.org) Received: from societe.kerguelen.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by societe.kerguelen.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6R96q1G007508; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:06:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (jaapb@localhost) by societe.kerguelen.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6R96pba023526; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:06:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:06:50 +0200 (CEST) From: Jaap Boender To: "Gary W. Swearingen" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange bootloader problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:07:27 -0000 On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: > Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:03:07 -0700 > From: Gary W. Swearingen > To: Jaap Boender > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Strange bootloader problem > > Jaap Boender writes: > >> So now I'm stumped. Does anyone have any advice? I'm running 5.4-STABLE, just >> cvsupped, built and installed an hour ago. > > Since you changed your BIOS, I'm suspecting something fishy with the > BIOS settings for disk geometry, like not LBA or something, but you've > probably already checked the BIOS setup... > > Read the boot(8) manpage paragraph starting with "However," which > says how to by-pass "/boot/loader" and maybe try that. > > Also, loader(8) manpage has a boot_verbose variable that might help. > -- "War is God's way of teaching Americans geography." -- Ambrose Bierce From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 09:20:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16D316A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:20:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jaapb@kerguelen.org) Received: from societe.kerguelen.org (catv9079.extern.kun.nl [131.174.119.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB4343D69 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:20:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jaapb@kerguelen.org) Received: from societe.kerguelen.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by societe.kerguelen.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6R9Ku64015664; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:20:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (jaapb@localhost) by societe.kerguelen.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6R9KtX9005474; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:20:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:20:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Jaap Boender To: "Gary W. Swearingen" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange bootloader problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:21:00 -0000 [Sorry about the previous message, I hit the wrong key. X and C are very close together...] >> Since you changed your BIOS, I'm suspecting something fishy with the >> BIOS settings for disk geometry, like not LBA or something, but you've >> probably already checked the BIOS setup... I hadn't thought about the disk geometry, but I have looked at the BIOS, yes. Unfortunately, it being a DELL BIOS, there weren't many useful settings I could change (and 'disk geometry' wasn't even mentioned...) >> Read the boot(8) manpage paragraph starting with "However," which >> says how to by-pass "/boot/loader" and maybe try that. >> >> Also, loader(8) manpage has a boot_verbose variable that might help. I've just tried them both, but Grub launches the loader immediately, without any possibility for bypassing. The FreeBSD boot manager just beeps when I try to boot FreeBSD (presumably due to the same problem). I've also tried loading the kernel directly from Grub, but the first time this resulted in a lock-up just after recognizing the ad0 device - and the second and later times I didn't get even that far. Nonetheless, the disk geometry avenue looks promising. I'll see if I can get anywhere using that. Resetting to defaults apparently isn't enough... Thanks, Jaap Boender -- "War is God's way of teaching Americans geography." -- Ambrose Bierce From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 09:32:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCB216A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:32:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43ADC43D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:32:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so136015wra for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:32:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fdh0nRGkUZKq03ihtyyoLRLHjR6p6q7p48HAnqqpDr1ICjvvLUpHr70m9m+O3JdtRBM+/ct5cxetHKdIriH3Rt9wcI5ld8d0cytVwnjEOBVa/ZNP5Zagbw3X/x7vdClWa6fJcGP1E51hHRVymXRCenioz5Y01Q3E2EISd0kv19E= Received: by 10.54.57.21 with SMTP id f21mr58712wra; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:32:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.61.2 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:32:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:32:28 +0400 From: "Andrew P." To: "Michael C. Shultz" In-Reply-To: <200507261720.11329.ringworm01@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200507261631.45751.ringworm01@gmail.com> <200507261720.11329.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Andrew P." List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:32:30 -0000 On 7/27/05, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > On Tuesday 26 July 2005 16:48, Andrew P. wrote: > > On 7/27/05, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > > On Tuesday 26 July 2005 16:00, Andrew P. wrote: > > > > Hello all! > > > > > > > > I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95 > > > > workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cab= le. > > > > I am now able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between all kinds of Windows > > > > 2000/XP machines with all kinds of cheapest 100Mbit ethernet hardwa= re. > > > > > > > > But I have never ever exceeded 8-9Mbytes/s between a Windows machin= e > > > > and a FreeBSD box - _never_. Be it Samba, different ftp/http server= s, > > > > different FreeBSD versions (4.x/5.x), with ipfw enabled or disabled= , > > > > etc., - the speed always hovers around 7-8Mb/s. I know it's not > > > > critical, I know I should've upgraded to Gigabit hardware long ago, > > > > but is there something wrong? > > > > > > > > I tried different linux distros, but they all seem to be even slowe= r. > > > > Wazzup?.. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Andrew P. > > > > > > Here is the "ifconfig" output from a machine that has one nic set at > > > 10Mbit/half duplex and one at 100Mbit full duplex. how does it compar= e > > > with your system? > > > > > > xl0: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > > > options=3D1 > > > inet6 fe80::210:4bff:fe70:4fb0%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > > > inet 71.102.0.97 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 71.102.0.255 > > > ether 00:10:4b:70:4f:b0 > > > media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP) > > > status: active > > > xl1: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > > > options=3D1 > > > inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 > > > inet6 fe80::210:4bff:fe0a:7cbc%xl1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > > > ether 00:10:4b:0a:7c:bc > > > media: Ethernet 100baseTX > > > status: active > > > > Well, if that really matters to you: > > (freebsd 5.4) > > vr0: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > > inet6 fe80::20f:3dff:feca:c494%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > > inet 192.168.17.217 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.17.255 > > ether 00:0f:3d:ca:c4:94 > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > > status: active > > rl0: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > > options=3D8 > > inet 192.168.17.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.17.255 > > ether 00:40:f4:8d:a7:f8 > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > > status: active >=20 > Same netmask for two different segments of the same class C network? How'= s it > work with one segment disconnected? >=20 > -Mike >=20 >=20 > > rl1: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > > options=3D8 > > ether 00:40:f4:8d:9c:af > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > > status: active > > (fedora core 4) > > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:81:2F:04:3E > > inet addr:193.233.5.13 Bcast:193.233.5.63 Mask:255.255.255.= 192 > > inet6 addr: fe80::2e0:81ff:fe2f:43e/64 Scope:Link > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > > RX packets:123946466 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > > TX packets:176380358 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > > RX bytes:42267471987 (39.3 GiB) TX bytes:197116022761 (183.5 > > GiB) Interrupt:177 > > > > Andrew P. >=20 Actually vr0 and rl0 are on different boxes :) Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 09:45:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E21916A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:45:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9424643D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:45:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so138019wra for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:45:36 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WnKjyZrUEO+t0E3AuzVeCLZHHJ5ZQXBksHCi2/rZPWwcHFKAInHmD1FyPu6uh5NkTaF5VLaQ/cz73H38sqZvob2Tm037MrGH3Mu0aa4GMNspFR1S7IlGzV4inekf0MgmJeXaG9DVkJhnYH4LKbVsK/gjwEgzHRM8ozCCzKZ6gXo= Received: by 10.54.47.69 with SMTP id u69mr258414wru; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:45:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.61.2 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:45:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:45:36 +0400 From: "Andrew P." To: Nikolas Britton In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Andrew P." List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:45:38 -0000 On 7/27/05, Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 7/26/05, Andrew P. wrote: > > Hello all! > > > > I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95 > > workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cable. > > I am now able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between all kinds of Windows > > 2000/XP machines with all kinds of cheapest 100Mbit ethernet hardware. >=20 > How is it possible to get "11-12Mbytes/s" from 10Base2? Redo your math > ( 2(20) * 10 / 8 ) and you get an absolute of 1.31MB/s for 10Mbit > Ethernet. BUT this number has no meaning in the real world! The > theoretical maximum data throughput for a 10Mbps Ethernet system is > 9.744MB/s using 1518 byte frames. The last time I checked Microsoft > could only break anti-trust laws, not physics. >=20 Oh, sorry. You probably can't get 100Mbit over BNC. I meant two combo FastEthernet cards connected via UTP. The question was how can you reach Windows-to-Windows performance between Windows and FreeBSD. Thanks, Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 09:48:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF0116A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:48:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C2D43D49 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:48:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so138580wra for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:48:57 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PGIMAjCFfmy7jqu8g7DxoPB/U2y5IUeURqywZN6lwVjdFtGewtyvyawesn1MajMQvYhzYQraq5r2TkWr4o8X1ru3W2VRV004FbcPfKQ5jIMi5GFpsEP6xDLSl2knfYw+EKXXe0GXeL+Pg2nqTjuLkHVlVzADL7J19mLpTRTJFJ4= Received: by 10.54.45.14 with SMTP id s14mr272003wrs; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.61.2 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:48:57 +0400 From: "Andrew P." To: Eric Schuele In-Reply-To: <42E70F2C.7000209@computer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200507261631.45751.ringworm01@gmail.com> <42E70F2C.7000209@computer.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Andrew P." List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:48:59 -0000 On 7/27/05, Eric Schuele wrote: > Andrew P. wrote: > > On 7/27/05, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > > >>On Tuesday 26 July 2005 16:00, Andrew P. wrote: > >> > >>>Hello all! > >>> > >>>I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95 > >>>workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cable. > >>>I am now able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between all kinds of Windows > >>>2000/XP machines with all kinds of cheapest 100Mbit ethernet hardware. > >>> > >>>But I have never ever exceeded 8-9Mbytes/s between a Windows machine > >>>and a FreeBSD box - _never_. Be it Samba, different ftp/http servers, >=20 > FWIW... I recently had reason to investigate a network's performance. I > was able to consistently get ~95% throughput from windows machines to > FreeBSD boxes. I was using iperf (there is a WinX version of iperf as > well) and chargen for testing. All PCs were old, and generally using > cheap onboard NICs >=20 > Might try tools specifically geared towards throughput testing. Various > protocols have varying amounts of overhead. Tools with throughput > testing in mind obviously have overhead minimized. >=20 > Just my .02 cents. >=20 Well, I never doubted that some tests can show you efficient bandwidth usage. But how can we reach it in practice? > >>>different FreeBSD versions (4.x/5.x), with ipfw enabled or disabled, > >>>etc., - the speed always hovers around 7-8Mb/s. I know it's not > >>>critical, I know I should've upgraded to Gigabit hardware long ago, > >>>but is there something wrong? > >>> > >>>I tried different linux distros, but they all seem to be even slower. > >>>Wazzup?.. > >>> > >>>Thanks, > >>>Andrew P. > >> > >>Here is the "ifconfig" output from a machine that has one nic set at > >>10Mbit/half duplex and one at 100Mbit full duplex. how does it compare = with > >>your system? > >> > >>xl0: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > >> options=3D1 > >> inet6 fe80::210:4bff:fe70:4fb0%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > >> inet 71.102.0.97 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 71.102.0.255 > >> ether 00:10:4b:70:4f:b0 > >> media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP) >=20 > .02 more cents..... > Sometimes autoselect can work against you. Might try tying it down. >=20 I have some problems with Autoselect on Cisco boxes in Gigabit environments, but never with FreeBSD on 100Mbit. > >> status: active > >>xl1: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > >> options=3D1 > >> inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 > >> inet6 fe80::210:4bff:fe0a:7cbc%xl1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > >> ether 00:10:4b:0a:7c:bc > >> media: Ethernet 100baseTX > >> status: active > >> > > > > Well, if that really matters to you: > > (freebsd 5.4) > > vr0: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > > inet6 fe80::20f:3dff:feca:c494%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > > inet 192.168.17.217 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.17.255 > > ether 00:0f:3d:ca:c4:94 > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > > status: active > > rl0: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > > options=3D8 > > inet 192.168.17.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.17.255 > > ether 00:40:f4:8d:a7:f8 > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > > status: active > > rl1: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > > options=3D8 > > ether 00:40:f4:8d:9c:af > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > > status: active > > (fedora core 4) > > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:81:2F:04:3E > > inet addr:193.233.5.13 Bcast:193.233.5.63 Mask:255.255.255.= 192 > > inet6 addr: fe80::2e0:81ff:fe2f:43e/64 Scope:Link > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > > RX packets:123946466 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > > TX packets:176380358 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > > RX bytes:42267471987 (39.3 GiB) TX bytes:197116022761 (183.5= GiB) > > Interrupt:177 > > > > Andrew P. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd= .org" > > >=20 >=20 > -- > Regards, > Eric >=20 Thanks, Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 10:34:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C910316A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:34:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1020843D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:34:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from beatrix.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with SMTP id j6RAYous027025; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:34:50 +0300 Received: from beatrix.daedalusnetworks.priv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by beatrix.daedalusnetworks.priv (8.13.3+Sun/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6RAYovB028805; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:34:50 +0300 (EEST) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by beatrix.daedalusnetworks.priv (8.13.3+Sun/8.13.3/Submit) id j6RAYnYZ028804; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:34:49 +0300 (EEST) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:34:49 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Nikolas Britton Message-ID: <20050727103449.GB28777@beatrix.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <42E69B11.6070208@t-hosting.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: =?iso-8859-7?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:34:53 -0000 On 2005-07-26 19:16, Nikolas Britton wrote: > This is what I normally add to my make.conf file: > CPUTYPE=p2 > CFLAGS= -Os -pipes > COPTFLAGS= -Os -pipes > #CXXFLAGS= don't remember what I set this too, don't use it a lot. I'm sure you mean -pipe and not -pipes :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 10:36:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE3816A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:36:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry.mityugov@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28C043D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:36:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry.mityugov@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i12so136174wra for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:36:57 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rGF7gXSTf8BNEqpOZQNRpSm+wcpUEbEu7nooUXmUXebNO2SOJXmkA1ByQZtOpDdFeo/T1LsouoSWZU4xro+OXtDKSuO8DEdshul9RUQKF9wKpvf0KjnFAfuUkc7HEir2DyBAlqzr1QUijj7bpxoBo2o8g45mzxgx8FFrDuyOaLE= Received: by 10.54.43.11 with SMTP id q11mr288775wrq; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:36:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.56.33 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:36:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:36:57 +0400 From: Dmitry Mityugov To: luis In-Reply-To: <42E70863.2070803@satx.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <42E70863.2070803@satx.rr.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DELL SC 1420 Server, failed 5.4 installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dmitry Mityugov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:36:58 -0000 On 7/27/05, luis wrote: > I recently bought a Dell SC 1420 server, single Xeon 2.8GhZ CPU, > 512MB memory, WD 40GB SATA drive, embedded dual channel SATA controller > and so far have failed to install FreeBSD. I have tried 5.4, 5.3, 4.4 > and after recognizing the drive installation has always stopped at > "Waiting 15 secs for scsi drives to settle". ... Try to disable ACPI during installation (option 2 in the boot menu). --=20 Dmitry Mityugov, St. Petersburg, Russia I ignore all messages with confidentiality statements "We live less by imagination than despite it" - Rockwell Kent, "N by E" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 10:56:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC06016A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:56:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corwin@amber.aeternal.net) Received: from amber.aeternal.net (amber.in.markiza.sk [62.168.76.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29FAD43D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:56:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corwin@amber.aeternal.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79776B853 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:59:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from amber.aeternal.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (amber.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03869-04 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:59:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from amber.aeternal.net (localhost.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74631B852 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:59:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from corwin@localhost) by amber.aeternal.net (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j6RAxbsS008436 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:59:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from corwin) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:59:36 +0200 From: martin hudec To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050727105936.GA97664@amber.aeternal.net> References: <491A44A6-1409-4D9E-AEFD-2B8665D52BA7@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Copyright: (C) 2005 Martin Hudec X-Operating-System: FreeBSD amber.aeternal.net 5.4-STABLE i386 X-PGP-Key: http://www.aeternal.net/corwin_aeternal.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at aeternal.net Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: martin hudec List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:56:22 -0000 --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 03:13:50AM +0400 or thereabouts, Andrew P. wrote: > Erm, well 60+Mbytes is no wonder in a Gigabit environment (and it is > too much of a wonder in a FastEthernet one), but I'm interested in > getting 100Mbit hardware to work at full speed. If I take that your "NE2000 $10 NIC's" is what you call 100Mbit hardware, then.. would you mind if I ask: what do you expect more from such $10-harware other than just to flicker and to eat electric current? =20 Use *real* 100Mbit hardware please :). BTW I have same performance with my sis900/rl8139 NIC's. cheers, Martin --=20 martin hudec * 421 907 303 393 * corwin@aeternal.net * http://www.aeternal.net "Nothing travels faster than the speed of light with the possible=20 exception of bad news, which obeys its own special laws." Douglas Adams, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC52kYZYEZIv+rgggRAsQ/AJ9EIWQ1K8iLGyISvxG3pmz5pukYLACeP59n nXxASdzmQHFJM8AI3lwQk7k= =mKF0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 11:14:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F5E16A420 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:14:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from icarey@bigpond.com) Received: from omta05ps.mx.bigpond.com (omta05ps.mx.bigpond.com [144.140.83.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079B543D69 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:14:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from icarey@bigpond.com) Received: from IVAN ([147.69.111.113]) by omta05ps.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20050727111410.NZWB21584.omta05ps.mx.bigpond.com@IVAN> for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:14:10 +0000 From: "Ivan Carey" To: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:15:08 +1000 Message-ID: <000101c5929c$73643e30$0201a8c0@IVAN> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: How does gmirror know of a faulty drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:14:36 -0000 In FreeBSD 5.3 I have set up 2 drives in RAID-1 format. How will I know if one of the drives is faulty such as either not = working or has some lost sectors? Is it possible to have gmirror email me if there is a problem? Thanks, Ivan=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 11:15:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C22316A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:15:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from icarey@bigpond.com) Received: from omta05ps.mx.bigpond.com (omta05ps.mx.bigpond.com [144.140.83.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B903543D5C for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:15:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from icarey@bigpond.com) Received: from IVAN ([147.69.111.113]) by omta05ps.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20050727111525.OAYM21584.omta05ps.mx.bigpond.com@IVAN> for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:15:25 +0000 From: "Ivan Carey" To: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:16:24 +1000 Message-ID: <000601c5929c$a0304a80$0201a8c0@IVAN> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Shutdown -r now will not reboot pc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:15:35 -0000 Hello, I'm using FreeBSD 5.3 When I try to reboot the pc with shutdown -r now the system gets as far as rebooting and hangs there. Is there maybe a setup in the bios to allow the pc to reboot. Thanks, Ivan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 11:16:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F72716A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:16:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from icarey@bigpond.com) Received: from omta03ps.mx.bigpond.com (omta03ps.mx.bigpond.com [144.140.82.155]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC9043D76 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:16:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from icarey@bigpond.com) Received: from IVAN ([147.69.111.113]) by omta03ps.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20050727111614.SEXY10252.omta03ps.mx.bigpond.com@IVAN> for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:16:14 +0000 From: "Ivan Carey" To: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:17:12 +1000 Message-ID: <000b01c5929c$bd4f9530$0201a8c0@IVAN> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: KVM switch problem with mouse X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:16:36 -0000 Hello, I'm using FreeBSD 5.3 I'm using a MC2050, MC2060 2 port auto kvm switch. My mouse does not work either at the console or in KDE, the keyboard is ok. Is there a command I need to place into the kernel to get the mouse driver to recognise the mouse via the KVM switch? Thanks, Ivan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 11:17:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A36916A420 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:17:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu (server.t-hosting.hu [217.20.133.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB94343D7F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:17:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9B59979E3; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:17:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.t-hosting.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 11454-02-4; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:17:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [80.98.156.20] (catv-50629c14.catv.broadband.hu [80.98.156.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF74997587; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:17:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E815EC.20309@t-hosting.hu> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:17:00 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nikolas Britton References: <42E69B11.6070208@t-hosting.hu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Cc: FreeBSD - Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:17:35 -0000 Nikolas Britton wrote: >On 7/26/05, Kövesdán Gábor wrote: > > >>Nikolas Britton wrote: >> >> >> >>>Is it just me or is -O2 now the default for kernel builds? What about >>>-Os, safe to use? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>So is it for me. But if I specify some CFLAGS, for example -O3 >>-march=athlon64, the >>building fails, but CFLAGS mustn't affect the kernel compiling process >>afaik. There is >>COPTFLAGS for that reason. I've also made a PR about this new, unwanted >>behaviour, >>but haven't got any answers so yet. >> >> >> > >You are right, COPTCLAGS is for the kernel only. -O3 is not officially >supported for CFLAGS or COPTFLAGS. If you use -O3 for CFLAGS it will >break some ports. Also from my experience using anything higher then >CPUTYPE=p2 will break ports (like gstreamer). > >This is what I normally add to my make.conf file: >CPUTYPE=p2 >CFLAGS= -Os -pipes >COPTFLAGS= -Os -pipes >#CXXFLAGS= don't remember what I set this too, don't use it a lot. > >If I want a port to build with different settings I just tell it to >inline... make CPUTYPE=p4 install clean etc. > > > Yes, I know -O3 isn't supported for either, but I didn't mean ports. The kernel building fails with this: CFLAGS=-O3 -march=athlon64 #COPTFLAGS=-O3 -march=athlon64 <-This is commenred out! And this breaks the kernel compiling. See this: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=83995 >As far as -O2 as the default for the kernel... I thought it was more >important to have a small kernel then a faster but fatter one. The >smaller the kernel the more you can put in L1,2, and 3 cache and the >smaller the program the less it needs to hit ram, swap, and hard disk? >isn't this what apple does with their OS-X builds? > > I also use -Os -march=athlon64 on the server I administer. :) Cheers, Gábor Kövesdán From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 11:23:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A57F16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:23:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lramos3@satx.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.texas.rr.com (ms-smtp-01.texas.rr.com [24.93.47.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47CAF43D6B for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:23:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lramos3@satx.rr.com) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (cpe-66-69-40-1.satx.res.rr.com [66.69.40.1]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.texas.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id j6RBNfH9002301; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:23:42 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <42E76EB5.2070902@satx.rr.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:23:33 -0500 From: luis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041016 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Mityugov References: <42E70863.2070803@satx.rr.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DELL SC 1420 Server, failed 5.4 installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:23:45 -0000 Dmitry Mityugov wrote: >On 7/27/05, luis wrote: > > >> I recently bought a Dell SC 1420 server, single Xeon 2.8GhZ CPU, >>512MB memory, WD 40GB SATA drive, embedded dual channel SATA controller >>and so far have failed to install FreeBSD. I have tried 5.4, 5.3, 4.4 >>and after recognizing the drive installation has always stopped at >>"Waiting 15 secs for scsi drives to settle". >> >> >... > >Try to disable ACPI during installation (option 2 in the boot menu). > > > Dmitry, just tried it and didn't work. Still stops at "Waiting ..... to settle". I have tried starting in safe and won't work either. Thanks for your help. Luis From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 11:25:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD1016A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:25:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@orbweavers.co.uk) Received: from mail.orbweavers.co.uk (213-152-38-100.dsl.eclipse.net.uk [213.152.38.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C91D43D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:25:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@orbweavers.co.uk) Received: from www.orbweavers.co.uk (localhost.orbweavers.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) by mail.orbweavers.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB50BB2504 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:39:14 +0100 (BST) Received: from 217.37.3.201 (SquirrelMail authenticated user martin) by www.orbweavers.co.uk with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:39:14 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <3040.217.37.3.201.1122457154.squirrel@www.orbweavers.co.uk> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:39:14 +0100 (BST) From: martin@orbweavers.co.uk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: LDAP/nss_ldap adduser script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:25:25 -0000 Hi all, I've been using an ldap directory for quite a while now for my network logins, and love it. Problem is, it can be quite cumbersome to work with, any ldap clients I have looked at are either very sketchy or overly cumbersome for simple tasks (adding/removing users etc.), and ldif file format is a major pain to work with. My first question is - is anyone aware of a good light and stable ldap client that is easy to setup and use. My own research suggests no, which leads onto my proposal - I'm planning on writing a few basic scripts for working with the system - a 'ldap_adduser', 'ldap_rmuser' etc. Nothing major, not a full suite of utilities, just the basics to make life a little easier. I've had a look at the adduser script and it should be straight forward enough to tailer to this purpose, and I can't see any difficulties in writing them - check /etc/ldap.conf for the location of the users & groups, pops the details into an ldif and runs it through the ldap client. The one thing I am not sure about is getting the next available uid number, but I'm sure the answer will become apparent. So before I get into the meat of this, I wanted to check if anyone has any suggestions or comments. Cheers, Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 11:44:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4397C16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:44:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from demigor@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D051943D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:44:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from demigor@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so130681nzo for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:44:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=AkDmrB4uGmznt7HSOuzpuu9Kd6T1kkEkGSLDyxOdvJA3MRDMr83eHtLEUUuVcBbHi6THZwuQnUn9APBU7PPUdD3Ju+JRos/503dcS4W9BvfBFtF6tWF/e8UqwErUABREom2QyKj1CBok0jH+psjvOgotYmWZDfFr4OmIK5cpqng= Received: by 10.36.25.4 with SMTP id 4mr812225nzy; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:44:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.13.10 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:44:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:44:31 +0300 From: demigor To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: demigor List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:44:32 -0000 Hello, How one could defragment a partition on FreeBSD ? Which tools are available= =20 for this ? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 11:48:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A247A16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:48:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zickxell@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FEB43D62 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:48:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zickxell@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i22so157166wra for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:48:29 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:x-mailer:reply-to:x-priority:message-id:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tZSSk88p7Gz75aZ6q9gHmTcK3UIRDagDjJv2OqtARLH2rB5meLv8cENmS3Zs8++T8oitDEGDg/73vTC8MKrwHGHsDS7leR3a24HYs+YPu3aPKyt/UdxGTiZoQoErpx4DEqCm9Qvnaw5x7WhGUDlO+G9sxAfDsUX96fZqfcRU2y4= Received: by 10.54.116.20 with SMTP id o20mr295697wrc; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:48:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?80.237.53.22? ([80.237.53.22]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 38sm764940wrl.2005.07.27.04.48.28; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:48:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:56:22 +0600 From: zick-1 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.1.33) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <795429317.20050727125622@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: question PPP FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: zick-1 List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:48:30 -0000 Hello. In an installation time of system I have not set parameters PPP. Whether it is possible to set them now when the system is installed? -- Best regards, Sergey mailto:zickxell@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 11:51:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B565416A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:51:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kheuer2@gwdg.de) Received: from gwdu60.gwdg.de (gwdu60.gwdg.de [134.76.8.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE5D43D70 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:51:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kheuer2@gwdg.de) Received: from gwdu60.gwdg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gwdu60.gwdg.de (8.13.1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j6RBp5DF098238; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:51:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kheuer2@gwdg.de) Received: from localhost (kheuer2@localhost) by gwdu60.gwdg.de (8.13.1/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id j6RBp4Hk098235; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:51:04 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: gwdu60.gwdg.de: kheuer2 owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:51:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Konrad Heuer To: demigor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20050727134713.Y76649@gwdu60.gwdg.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:51:11 -0000 On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, demigor wrote: > How one could defragment a partition on FreeBSD ? Which tools are available > for this ? Why should you want to do this? There's no harmful fragmentation in the UFS of FreeBSD unless you exceed the max capacity of 100% which is 92% when looking closer but reported as 100% by df. Regards Konrad Heuer GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, kheuer2@gwdg.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 11:56:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 635A616A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:56:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from server.absolute-media.de (server.absolute-media.de [213.239.231.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E4143D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:56:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E69D8C102; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:56:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.absolute-media.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12059-02; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:56:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firewall.demig (p50839235.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.131.146.53]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24CA8C7A4; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:56:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ws-ew-3 (ws-ew-3.w2kdemig [192.168.1.72]) by firewall.demig (8.13.4/8.13.1) with SMTP id j6RBsQgF084762; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:54:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) From: "Norbert Koch" To: "demigor" , Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:54:25 +0200 Message-ID: <000001c592a1$ef621660$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at absolute-media.de Cc: Subject: RE: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:56:45 -0000 > How one could defragment a partition on FreeBSD ? Which tools are > available > for this ? None as I know. Usually there is no reason to defragment a ufs partition. Norbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 11:56:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E8D16A426 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:56:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from server.absolute-media.de (server.absolute-media.de [213.239.231.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9419243D6A for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:56:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA0A8B3D5; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:56:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.absolute-media.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11965-06; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:56:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firewall.demig (p50839235.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.131.146.53]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F428C79E; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:56:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ws-ew-3 (ws-ew-3.w2kdemig [192.168.1.72]) by firewall.demig (8.13.4/8.13.1) with SMTP id j6RBsQgH084762; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:54:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) From: "Norbert Koch" To: "zick-1" , Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:54:38 +0200 Message-ID: <000101c592a1$f74dfb00$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <795429317.20050727125622@gmail.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at absolute-media.de Cc: Subject: RE: question PPP FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:56:48 -0000 > In an installation time of system I have not set parameters PPP. > Whether it is possible to set them now when the system is installed? /etc/ppp/ppp.conf /usr/share/examples/ppp "man 8 ppp" (for userland ppp) Norbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 12:12:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B997016A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:12:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (ei.xs4all.nl [213.84.67.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F2043D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:12:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6RCDPj4030496; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:13:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6RCDP0U030495; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:13:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:13:25 +0200 From: Ruben de Groot To: martin@orbweavers.co.uk Message-ID: <20050727121325.GA29568@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , martin@orbweavers.co.uk, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3040.217.37.3.201.1122457154.squirrel@www.orbweavers.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3040.217.37.3.201.1122457154.squirrel@www.orbweavers.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=failed version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on ei.bzerk.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LDAP/nss_ldap adduser script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:12:05 -0000 On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:39:14AM +0100, martin@orbweavers.co.uk typed: > Hi all, > > I've been using an ldap directory for quite a while now for my network > logins, and love it. Problem is, it can be quite cumbersome to work > with, any ldap clients I have looked at are either very sketchy or > overly cumbersome for simple tasks (adding/removing users etc.), and > ldif file format is a major pain to work with. > > My first question is - is anyone aware of a good light and stable ldap > client that is easy to setup and use. My own research suggests no, which > leads onto my proposal - > > I'm planning on writing a few basic scripts for working with the system > - a 'ldap_adduser', 'ldap_rmuser' etc. Nothing major, not a full suite > of utilities, just the basics to make life a little easier. > > I've had a look at the adduser script and it should be straight forward > enough to tailer to this purpose, and I can't see any difficulties in > writing them - check /etc/ldap.conf for the location of the users & > groups, pops the details into an ldif and runs it through the ldap > client. The one thing I am not sure about is getting the next available > uid number, but I'm sure the answer will become apparent. > > So before I get into the meat of this, I wanted to check if anyone has > any suggestions or comments. Well, how would you go about determining the default user's set of objectclasses and attributes? e.g. we have in our ldap users with different combinations of sambaSamAccount, posixAccount and courierMailAccount. If you want your script to be flexible enough to provide all possible options, you'll end up writing a very complex script. But good luck anyway ;-) Ruben From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 17:19:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7F116A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:19:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kanwar@launch3.net) Received: from launch3.net (s10.n41.vds2000.com [66.84.41.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BA543D49 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:19:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kanwar@launch3.net) Received: from intern (ool-4573afa5.dyn.optonline.net [69.115.175.165]) by launch3.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j6QHJUm04473 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:19:30 -0400 From: "Kanwar Singh" To: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:19:26 -0400 Organization: Launch 3 Communications, Inc. Message-ID: <000001c59206$2d342ba0$5402a8c0@intern> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:21:14 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: QUESTION. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:19:32 -0000 I am trying to get BSD 5 on my system. I copied the image file on the CD, but cant get the system to boot form the CD. I have tried changing the boot order, but still does not work. I was wondering if I need to copy an additional file, like a boot.ini file to make the system boot form the image CD. Awaiting your reply. Thank you. Sincerely, Kanwar Singh New Business-International Buyer ********* Launch 3 Communications,Inc. 141 Lanza Avenue Building 3C Garfield, New Jersey 07026 USA Voice: 646.435.2802 Fax: 646.536.3866 Web: http://www.launch3.net Email: kanwar@launch3.net AOL IM: Kanwar at Launch3 MSN: s_umrao@hotmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 02:52:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7D116A41F; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:52:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A54243D46; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:52:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j6R2qJFj079503; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:52:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:52:19 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: ".VWV." Message-ID: <20050727025219.GA2652@dan.emsphone.com> References: <007b01c59251$925c5ca0$98edfea9@workstation> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <007b01c59251$925c5ca0$98edfea9@workstation> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:21:14 +0000 Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: certance DAT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:52:20 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 27), .VWV. said: > I would like to know, if the following product can be used, in order > to make tape dumps or tape tars with the FreeBSD 4.x. > > http://www.certance.com/products/dds-dat/dat72/CD72LWH-SS Yes; pretty much any SCSI tape drive will work without problems in FreeBSD. I've used everything from 9-track to 3480 to DLTs. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 11:36:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9BD16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:36:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: from excite.com (nn3.excitenetwork.com [207.159.120.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D03B43D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:36:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: by xprdmailfe22.nwk.excite.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 6EE81299A0; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:36:04 -0400 (EDT) To: glenn@antimatter.net, piotrekk@excite.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from [84.73.114.198] by xprdmailfe22.nwk.excite.com via HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:36:04 EST X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: ID = 2383e4973664c80f7198bf469d15c13b From: "PK" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: piotrekk@excite.com X-Mailer: PHP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050727113604.6EE81299A0@xprdmailfe22.nwk.excite.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:36:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:21:14 +0000 Cc: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Subject: Re: cannot install ntop under freeBSD 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: piotrekk@excite.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:36:06 -0000 and howto build ntop without XML plugin ? --- On Mon 07/25, Glenn Dawson < glenn@antimatter.net > wrote: From: Glenn Dawson [mailto: glenn@antimatter.net] To: piotrekk@excite.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:34:13 -0700 Subject: Re: cannot install ntop under freeBSD 5.5 At 12:17 PM 7/25/2005, PK wrote:

>hi
>
>I did what you suggested.
>I've deinstalled rrdtool completely, tried install ntop but now I get
>following horrible errors:
>
>
>xmldumpPlugin.c:36:2: warning: #warning
>xmldumpPlugin.c:37:2: warning: #warning
>===========================================================
>xmldumpPlugin.c:38:2: warning: #warning
>xmldumpPlugin.c:39:2: warning: #warning The include of gdome.h that
>follows will generate a lot of
>xmldumpPlugin.c:40:2: warning: #warning compile warnings about 'shadows a
>global declaration'.
>xmldumpPlugin.c:41:2: warning: #warning Unfortunately, it's the way this
>crud is coded and can't
>xmldumpPlugin.c:42:2: warning: #warning be fixed. Just ignore them!
>xmldumpPlugin.c:43:2: warning: #warning

>[snip]


>In file included from xmldumpPlugin.c:1730:
>xml_g_intf.inc: In function `dumpXML_interfaces':
>xml_g_intf.inc:33: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort'
>gmake[3]: *** [xmldumpPlugin.lo] Error 1
>gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins'
>gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins'
>gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop'
>gmake: *** [all] Error 2
>*** Error code 2
>
>Stop in /usr/ports/net/ntop.
>
>
>It must be a BUG in the ntop port.

The problem is in the XML plugin. If you don't need that, ntop will build
properly without the XML plugin.

-Glenn


>greetings
>piotr

_______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 12:23:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CB416A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:23:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@orbweavers.co.uk) Received: from mail.orbweavers.co.uk (213-152-38-100.dsl.eclipse.net.uk [213.152.38.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1204A43D62 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:23:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@orbweavers.co.uk) Received: from 192.168.0.5 (localhost.orbweavers.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) by mail.orbweavers.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F2AB2B2C for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:23:40 +0100 (BST) Received: from 192.168.0.10 (SquirrelMail authenticated user martin) by 192.168.0.5 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:23:40 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <1201.192.168.0.10.1122467020.squirrel@192.168.0.5> In-Reply-To: <20050727121325.GA29568@ei.bzerk.org> References: <3040.217.37.3.201.1122457154.squirrel@www.orbweavers.co.uk> <20050727121325.GA29568@ei.bzerk.org> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:23:40 +0100 (BST) From: martin@orbweavers.co.uk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: LDAP/nss_ldap adduser script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:23:48 -0000 > On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:39:14AM +0100, martin@orbweavers.co.uk typed: >> Hi all, >> >> I've been using an ldap directory for quite a while now for my >> network >> logins, and love it. Problem is, it can be quite cumbersome to work >> with, any ldap clients I have looked at are either very sketchy or >> overly cumbersome for simple tasks (adding/removing users etc.), and >> ldif file format is a major pain to work with. >> >> My first question is - is anyone aware of a good light and stable ldap >> client that is easy to setup and use. My own research suggests no, which >> leads onto my proposal - >> >> I'm planning on writing a few basic scripts for working with the >> system >> - a 'ldap_adduser', 'ldap_rmuser' etc. Nothing major, not a full suite >> of utilities, just the basics to make life a little easier. >> >> I've had a look at the adduser script and it should be straight >> forward >> enough to tailer to this purpose, and I can't see any difficulties in >> writing them - check /etc/ldap.conf for the location of the users & >> groups, pops the details into an ldif and runs it through the ldap >> client. The one thing I am not sure about is getting the next available >> uid number, but I'm sure the answer will become apparent. >> >> So before I get into the meat of this, I wanted to check if anyone has >> any suggestions or comments. > > Well, how would you go about determining the default user's set of > objectclasses > and attributes? e.g. we have in our ldap users with different combinations > of > sambaSamAccount, posixAccount and courierMailAccount. > If you want your script to be flexible enough to provide all possible > options, > you'll end up writing a very complex script. But good luck anyway ;-) > > Ruben Primarily, my aim is to keep it simple, do the basics, thats the itch that needs scratching for me at the moment. It could be the base of a more encompassing management system, but that would be a different project. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 12:30:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E123A16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:30:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from jupiter.efacilitas.de (85-10-196-108.clients.your-server.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EFA343D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:30:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-37-29.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.37.29]) by jupiter.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4D2C3DC5A; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39AB712B135; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:30:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23684-04; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:30:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42E012B096; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:30:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E77E5E.4020303@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:30:22 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050517 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kanwar Singh References: <000001c59206$2d342ba0$5402a8c0@intern> In-Reply-To: <000001c59206$2d342ba0$5402a8c0@intern> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: QUESTION. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:30:53 -0000 Kanwar Singh wrote: > I am trying to get BSD 5 on my system. I copied the image file on the > CD, but cant get the system to boot form the CD. I have tried changing > the boot order, but still does not work. I was wondering if I need to > copy an additional file, like a boot.ini file to make the system boot > form the image CD. Awaiting your reply. Thank you. Do you see some directories and files on the CD or only a single file, e.g. 5.4-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso? Björn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 12:41:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E2216A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:41:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from server.absolute-media.de (server.absolute-media.de [213.239.231.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559EE43D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:41:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0698C033; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:41:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.absolute-media.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14447-05; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:41:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firewall.demig (p50839235.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.131.146.53]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18AF89B2C; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:41:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ws-ew-3 (ws-ew-3.w2kdemig [192.168.1.72]) by firewall.demig (8.13.4/8.13.1) with SMTP id j6RCajDw086182; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:36:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) From: "Norbert Koch" To: "Kanwar Singh" , Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:36:44 +0200 Message-ID: <000101c592a7$d907fbe0$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0 In-Reply-To: <000001c59206$2d342ba0$5402a8c0@intern> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at absolute-media.de Cc: Subject: RE: QUESTION. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:41:43 -0000 > I am trying to get BSD 5 on my system. I copied the image file on the > CD, but cant get the system to boot form the CD. I have tried changing > the boot order, but still does not work. I was wondering if I need to > copy an additional file, like a boot.ini file to make the system boot > form the image CD. Awaiting your reply. Thank you. You can't just copy the image file to the cd. What tool are you using to burn your cds. You should use a function to directly burn iso images to cd. Norbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 13:18:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE5C16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:18:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: from excite.com (nn3.excitenetwork.com [207.159.120.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B6B43D5E for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:18:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: by xprdmailfe22.nwk.excite.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 648C5299D4; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:18:43 -0400 (EDT) To: glenn@antimatter.net Received: from [84.73.114.198] by xprdmailfe22.nwk.excite.com via HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:18:43 EST X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: ID = 2383e4973664c80f7198bf469d15c13b From: "PK" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: piotrekk@excite.com X-Mailer: PHP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050727131843.648C5299D4@xprdmailfe22.nwk.excite.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:18:43 -0400 (EDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cannot install ntop under freeBSD 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: piotrekk@excite.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:18:45 -0000 thanks, but now I get rrd disaster: rm -f .libs/rrdPlugin.lo cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -I../myrrd -DFREEBSD -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/include -g -O -pipe -I/usr/local/include -g -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -fPIC -MT rrdPlugin.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/rrdPlugin.Tpo -c rrdPlugin.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/rrdPlugin.lo rrdPlugin.c: In function `graphCounter': rrdPlugin.c:583: error: too few arguments to function `rrd_graph' rrdPlugin.c: In function `netflowSummary': rrdPlugin.c:728: error: too few arguments to function `rrd_graph' rrdPlugin.c: In function `graphSummary': rrdPlugin.c:926: error: too few arguments to function `rrd_graph' gmake[3]: *** [rrdPlugin.lo] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/net/ntop. *** Error code 1 I cannot use both at the same time: make rmconfig in /usr/ports/net/ntop and this patch in /usr/ports/net/ntop/files to correct rrd: --- ntop.h.orig Tue Jul 26 03:39:16 2005 +++ ntop.h Tue Jul 26 03:39:29 2005 @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ #endif #ifndef EMBEDDED -#include "rrd.h" +#include "myrrd/rrd.h" #endif #ifdef HAVE_GETOPT_H this patch should solve rrdPlugin disaster. greetings piotr --- On Wed 07/27, Glenn Dawson < glenn@antimatter.net > wrote: From: Glenn Dawson [mailto: glenn@antimatter.net] To: piotrekk@excite.com Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:39:36 -0700 Subject: Re: cannot install ntop under freeBSD 5.5 At 04:36 AM 7/27/2005, you wrote:

>and howto build ntop without XML plugin ?

Just do make rmconfig in /usr/ports/net/ntop

Then when you do make install clean it should prompt you with a menu of
optional components. XML should be turned off by default, so if you just
accept the defaults, it should build without error.

-Glenn





> --- On Mon 07/25, Glenn Dawson < glenn@antimatter.net > wrote:
>From: Glenn Dawson [mailto: glenn@antimatter.net]
>To: piotrekk@excite.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Cc: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr
>Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:34:13 -0700
>Subject: Re: cannot install ntop under freeBSD 5.5
>
>At 12:17 PM 7/25/2005, PK wrote:

>hi
>
>I did what you
>suggested.
>I've deinstalled rrdtool completely, tried install ntop but
>now I get
>following horrible
>errors:
>
>
>xmldumpPlugin.c:36:2: warning:
>#warning
>xmldumpPlugin.c:37:2: warning: #warning
>
>===========================================================
>xmldumpPlugin.c:38:2:
>warning: #warning
>xmldumpPlugin.c:39:2: warning: #warning The include
>of gdome.h that
>follows will generate a lot
>of
>xmldumpPlugin.c:40:2: warning: #warning compile warnings about
>'shadows a
>global declaration'.
>xmldumpPlugin.c:41:2: warning:
>#warning Unfortunately, it's the way this
>crud is coded and
>can't
>xmldumpPlugin.c:42:2: warning: #warning be fixed. Just ignore
>them!
>xmldumpPlugin.c:43:2: warning:
>#warning

>[snip]


>In file included from
>xmldumpPlugin.c:1730:
>xml_g_intf.inc: In function
>`dumpXML_interfaces':
>xml_g_intf.inc:33: warning: nested
>extern declaration of `BufferTooShort'
>gmake[3]: ***
>[xmldumpPlugin.lo] Error 1
>gmake[3]: Leaving directory
>`/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins'
>gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive]
>Error 1
>gmake[2]: Leaving directory
>`/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins'
>gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive]
>Error 1
>gmake[1]: Leaving directory
>`/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop'
>gmake: *** [all] Error 2
>*** Error
>code 2
>
>Stop in /usr/ports/net/ntop.
>
>
>It must be a
>BUG in the ntop port.

The problem is in the XML plugin. If you
>don't need that, ntop will build
properly without the XML
>plugin.

-Glenn


>greetings
>piotr


>
>_______________________________________________
>Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
>The most personalized portal on the Web!

---

We've checked and double checked, it keeps coming up the same thing.
The message is "Mars needs women".

_______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 13:35:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C40116A421 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:35:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dataivNOSPAM@noc.peon.net) Received: from fep1.cogeco.net (smtp.cogeco.net [216.221.81.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89E443D4C for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:35:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dataivNOSPAM@noc.peon.net) Received: from radium.cmbn.vangeyn.net (d141-148-1.home.cgocable.net [24.141.148.1]) by fep1.cogeco.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA526127; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:35:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (dataiv@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by radium.cmbn.vangeyn.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6RDZnHm004224; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:35:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from dataivNOSPAM@noc.peon.net) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:35:49 -0400 (EDT) From: David van Geyn X-X-Sender: dataiv@radium.cmbn.vangeyn.net To: Lane In-Reply-To: <200507251556.26672.lane@joeandlane.com> Message-ID: <20050727093217.J4096@radium.cmbn.vangeyn.net> References: <200507251556.26672.lane@joeandlane.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1932320202-1122471349=:4096" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pppOe 1000baseTX config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:35:53 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-1932320202-1122471349=:4096 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE You won't gain anything beyond 10baseT/UTP with your DSL line. Also=20 because it is autodetecting at 10baseT/UTP suggests that your DSL modem=20 only has 10baseT support built in to it, so you can't use anything higher. Same goes for your internetl interface re0. It it autodetecting 100baseTX= =20 full-duplex which suggests that you have a 10/100baseTX switch. You can't= =20 just make your NIC use gigabit if the other end doesn't support it. You won't gain any speed on the DSL side for sure. Generally speaking I find autodetect to work well most of the time. I have= =20 rarely had a problem. David FreeBSD Tutorials @ http://freebsd.vangeyn.net On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Lane wrote: > Is there any speed advatage possible beyond the (10baseT/UTP)? If not th= en I > guess it doesn't matter. > > The dsl modem is on bge0, which ifconfig reports as > > bge0: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 options=3D1a > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 inet6 fe80::211:11ff:febd:be3a%bge0 prefixlen 64 scopeid = 0x1 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 ether 00:11:11:bd:be:3a > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP) > > My expectation (hope) is to change the "10base" in the media: line to > "100base" or "1000base" to gain any throughput advantage that is possible= =2E > > The internal network is on re0, which ifconfig reports as > > re0: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 options=3D1b > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.2= 55 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 inet6 fe80::240:f4ff:feb4:841a%re0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0= x2 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 ether 00:40:f4:b4:84:1a > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 status: active > > I'd like the change the "100base" in the media: line to a "1000base", if > possible. > > thanks for your eyes! > > lane --0-1932320202-1122471349=:4096-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 13:38:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE0A16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:38:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@orbweavers.co.uk) Received: from mail.orbweavers.co.uk (213-152-38-100.dsl.eclipse.net.uk [213.152.38.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E173843D4C for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:38:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@orbweavers.co.uk) Received: from www.orbweavers.co.uk (localhost.orbweavers.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) by mail.orbweavers.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20BC1B2434; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:38:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from 217.37.3.201 (SquirrelMail authenticated user martin) by www.orbweavers.co.uk with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:38:46 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <1101.217.37.3.201.1122471526.squirrel@www.orbweavers.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <000001c59206$2d342ba0$5402a8c0@intern> References: <000001c59206$2d342ba0$5402a8c0@intern> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:38:46 +0100 (BST) From: martin@orbweavers.co.uk To: "Kanwar Singh" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing from CD [was: QUESTION.] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:38:49 -0000 > I am trying to get BSD 5 on my system. I copied the image file on the > CD, but cant get the system to boot form the CD. I have tried changing > the boot order, but still does not work. I was wondering if I need to > copy an additional file, like a boot.ini file to make the system boot > form the image CD. Awaiting your reply. Thank you. > > Sincerely, > > > Kanwar Singh Most likely it is how the image file was written to the cd - if you just copied the iso file onto it (i.e. using the XP build in CD writer) it will not be bootable, or usable as a freebsd install cd at all. You need to actually write the iso file out to the CD, using something like nero (assuming you are using a windows machine to create it). BTW - try to use a more descriptive subject in emails, it makes searching the archives much easier. Cheers, Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 13:41:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC7716A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:41:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D99343D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:41:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from [66.47.111.183] (helo=joeandlane.com) by smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1Dxm9d-0001pl-Cl for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:41:01 -0400 Received: from joeandlane.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6RDn8X7017728 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:49:08 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by joeandlane.com (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j6RDn7rD017727 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:49:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from lane@joeandlane.com) X-Authentication-Warning: joeandlane.com: lholcombe set sender to lane@joeandlane.com using -f From: Lane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:49:06 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200507251556.26672.lane@joeandlane.com> <20050727093217.J4096@radium.cmbn.vangeyn.net> In-Reply-To: <20050727093217.J4096@radium.cmbn.vangeyn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507270849.07180.lane@joeandlane.com> X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CD-SOLUTIONS-MailScanner-From: lane@joeandlane.com X-ELNK-Trace: e56a4b6ca9bdfda11aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79ee27f79934bddae3a216a70053036704350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.47.111.183 Subject: Re: pppOe 1000baseTX config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:41:02 -0000 On Wednesday 27 July 2005 08:35, David van Geyn wrote: > You won't gain anything beyond 10baseT/UTP with your DSL line. Also > because it is autodetecting at 10baseT/UTP suggests that your DSL modem > only has 10baseT support built in to it, so you can't use anything higher. > > Same goes for your internetl interface re0. It it autodetecting 100baseTX > full-duplex which suggests that you have a 10/100baseTX switch. You can't > just make your NIC use gigabit if the other end doesn't support it. > > You won't gain any speed on the DSL side for sure. > > Generally speaking I find autodetect to work well most of the time. I have > rarely had a problem. > > David > FreeBSD Tutorials @ http://freebsd.vangeyn.net > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Lane wrote: > > Is there any speed advatage possible beyond the (10baseT/UTP)? If not > > then I guess it doesn't matter. > > > > The dsl modem is on bge0, which ifconfig reports as > > > > bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > >         options=1a > >         inet6 fe80::211:11ff:febd:be3a%bge0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > >         ether 00:11:11:bd:be:3a > >         media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP) > > > > My expectation (hope) is to change the "10base" in the media: line to > > "100base" or "1000base" to gain any throughput advantage that is > > possible. > > > > The internal network is on re0, which ifconfig reports as > > > > re0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > >         options=1b > >         inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 > >         inet6 fe80::240:f4ff:feb4:841a%re0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > >         ether 00:40:f4:b4:84:1a > >         media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > >         status: active > > > > I'd like the change the "100base" in the media: line to a "1000base", if > > possible. > > > > thanks for your eyes! > > > > lane Hey, thanks, David. So all I gotta do is (ugh) upgrade the hardware. At least on the internal side. lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 13:49:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC33216A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:49:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D5943D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:49:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 12994 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2005 13:49:40 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Jul 2005 13:49:40 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id E7DA92A; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:49:39 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: cartman_step1@spymac.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050726100637.BF2AF5C003E@webmail3.spymac.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 27 Jul 2005 09:49:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050726100637.BF2AF5C003E@webmail3.spymac.net> Message-ID: <44ek9k5pfx.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Re: sshd and pam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:49:41 -0000 writes: > Just i have a question about ssh and pam . > Trying to login on a machine with freebsd 5.4 from a machine in where i run > fedora core 4 , i can't complete the operation . > The error is sshd[449] pam authentication error . What does it mean?How i can set > pam to permit to login to freebsd and control the machine remotely? > I'm new to freebsd and i appreciate if anyone can help me to solve the problem . Are you logging in as root? That's disabled by default. What kind of authentication are you using? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 13:56:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099D316A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:56:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBF443D4C for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:56:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 3883 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2005 13:56:05 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Jul 2005 13:56:05 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 090BA2A; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:56:03 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Dan Rue References: <20050726211516.GF95651@therub.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 27 Jul 2005 09:56:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050726211516.GF95651@therub.org> Message-ID: <44ack85p58.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 44 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jail login and replication problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:56:06 -0000 Dan Rue writes: > Greetings, > > I am setting up multiple jails on a machine. The first jail, everything > works fine. If I add a user, that user can log in. If I tar cvzpf the > jail, tar xvzpf to create a new one, some people can log into the new > jail, and some can not. > > The user that can log in to the new one was the first user created (me), > but any subsequent users can not log into new jails.. > > The symptom is right after accepting the password via ssh, the > connection will just get dropped. I could not find any good error > messages using ssh.. But if I enable telnet and try to telnet in, I > receive this error in /var/log/messages: > > Jul 26 16:11:46 jail3 login: _secure_path: cannot stat /home/user3/.login_conf: Permission denied > Jul 26 16:11:46 jail3 login: _secure_path: cannot stat /etc/login.conf: Permission denied > Jul 26 16:11:46 jail3 login: _secure_path: cannot stat /home/user3/.login_conf: Permission denied > Jul 26 16:11:46 jail3 login: _secure_path: cannot stat /etc/login.conf: Permission denied > > The permissions on those files are fine. > > So what would cause that error in jails that have been replicated using > tar, but only to some users? I'm stumped.. > > Here's my rc.conf exerpt: > > jail_enable="YES" > jail_list="jail3" > jail_socket_unixiproute_only="NO" > jail_sysvipc_allow="YES" # allow shared mem on all jails > > jail_jail3_rootdir="/jails/jail3" > jail_jail3_hostname="jail3.example.com" > jail_jail3_ip="10.0.0.203" > jail_jail3_procfs_enable="YES" > jail_jail3_devfs_enable="YES" > jail_jail3_devfs_ruleset="devfsrules_jail" Try comparing the home directories of the different users. And if you crank up the verbosity of sshd, you may get more useful information. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 13:58:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B5416A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:58:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F76D43D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:58:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 11599 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2005 13:58:23 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Jul 2005 13:58:23 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 76E292A; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:58:22 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Mike Friedman References: <20050726103124.S67832@malcolm.berkeley.edu> <44zms9mfxn.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20050726142005.V67832@malcolm.berkeley.edu> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 27 Jul 2005 09:58:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050726142005.V67832@malcolm.berkeley.edu> Message-ID: <4464uw5p1d.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 49 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fastcgi port fixed but not updated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:58:23 -0000 Mike Friedman writes: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 at 17:10 (-0400), Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > > Mike Friedman writes: > > > >> I've recently discovered a problem report for the mod_fastcgi > >> (2.4.2) port: > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/79774. The report > >> seems to indicate that the port was fixed shortly after the PR was > >> sent (May 31), yet I just did a cvsup and the buggy port still > >> shows up. > >> > >> ... > >> > >> Anyone know what might be going on? Since the fastcgi port is > >> called by the rt-3.4.2 port (which is my real interest), keeping my > >> fixed version of the former around under a different name is not > >> really a good option, in case I need to update RT. > > > > The bug report claims that the install fails. It works fine for me > > with the Apache 1.3 port, so I suspect that a more sophisticated fix > > would be needed; if the path were hard-coded as you suggest, the > > port would *only* work with Apache2. > > Lowell, > > I can see your point about the content of the fix. But the bug report > does say the following (in the Audit-Trail): > > Port has been updated since this PR has been sent. > It seems to install flawlessly. > > As you say, the one line fix (in 'do-install') would not seem > consistent with your experience installing fastcgi with Apache 1.3, > where you don't have the problem. (I'm installing RT with fastcgi and > Apache 2). Just looking at the Makefile didn't reveal to me that the > fix proposed in the bug report wouldn't be appropriate for Apache 1.3. > > But my question was motivated by the apparent contradiction between > the above-quoted statement in the report and the fact that the port > wasn't actually updated (perhaps for the reason you give). > > Meanwhile, I'm left with a mod_fastcgi port that will not install, as > delivered, with Apache 2. Yet the RT port depends on the fastcgi port. Yep. Your problem is actually different than the one in the PR. I suggest filing a new PR; preferably with a committable fix. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 14:18:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15DDB16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:18:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from npsanders@bridgenex.com) Received: from smtp108.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp108.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58AD943D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:18:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from npsanders@bridgenex.com) Received: (qmail 64452 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2005 14:18:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO MARKETING-SYS) (npsanders@sbcglobal.net@64.168.30.29 with login) by smtp108.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Jul 2005 14:18:34 -0000 From: "Nathan Sanders" To: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:20:58 -0700 Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: m5mailer.com PID{307596c5-d2a1-4d39-adf5-d32248a2328e} RI{54b21-9088b} Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20050727141838.58AD943D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: Subject: Sr. Compiler Engineering Opportunity X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nathan Sanders List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:18:39 -0000 Hello- I'm hoping to network with you and find out if you know anyone who you think could be interested in the following opportunity? Sr. Compiler Engineer Position Type: Full-Time Employee Location: San Jose, California (Silicon Valley, USA) Generous Compensation and Stock package -------------------------------------------------------------------- Job Description: You will be responsible for identifying, developing, and delivering critical enhancements to programming models and the compiler tool chain for a new and unique multi-processor architecture. Requirements: Experience with compiler back-end technology In-depth understanding of processor architectures Excellent interpersonal and debugging skills Candidate should be self-motivated and comfortable working in a fast paced, mission-critical engineering environment Valuable Skills: Candidates with previous experience in multi-processor architectures, SIMD architectures and media architectures, as well as familiarity with the GCC source base is a plus. Experience: Minimum 3-5 years of experience M.S. in Computer Science, Computer or Electrical Engineering required PhD in Computer Science, Computer or Electrical Engineering a plus More about the company: Our client develops and licenses innovative computing, microprocessor and semiconductor technologies and related intellectual property. Founded in the mid 90's, They first became known for designing, developing and selling their highly efficient x86-compatible software- based microprocessors, which deliver a balance of low power consumption, high performance, low cost and small size suited for diverse computing platforms. They also develop advanced power management technologies for controlling leakage and increasing power efficiency in semiconductor and computing devices. Thanks, ------------------------------------------------------------------ Nathan Sanders Principal/Manager Bridgenex LLC 2464 El Camino Real #206 Santa Clara, Ca 95051 Office: 1.800.881.5733 Email: nathan@bridgenex.com Corporate: www.bridgenex.com :::STAFFING CONLULTANT SERVICES FOR HIGH TECH::: From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 14:36:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1970416A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:36:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dataivNOSPAM@noc.peon.net) Received: from fep7.cogeco.net (smtp.cogeco.net [216.221.81.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6E343D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:36:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dataivNOSPAM@noc.peon.net) Received: from radium.cmbn.vangeyn.net (d141-148-1.home.cgocable.net [24.141.148.1]) by fep7.cogeco.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC81615FE; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:36:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (dataiv@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by radium.cmbn.vangeyn.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6REaigY007660; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:36:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from dataivNOSPAM@noc.peon.net) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:36:43 -0400 (EDT) From: David van Geyn X-X-Sender: dataiv@radium.cmbn.vangeyn.net To: Lane In-Reply-To: <200507270849.07180.lane@joeandlane.com> Message-ID: <20050727103424.C7506@radium.cmbn.vangeyn.net> References: <200507251556.26672.lane@joeandlane.com> <20050727093217.J4096@radium.cmbn.vangeyn.net> <200507270849.07180.lane@joeandlane.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pppOe 1000baseTX config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:36:47 -0000 Well, yeah, that would be what to do, but why do you need to? I have a 100baseTX network at home and don't need any more. ~11.5MBytes/sec works just fine. It won't speed up your DSL if you upgrade any of the equipment. Your DSL line is probably < 4 Mbits/sec. So if that's all you're looking for, don't bother changing anything. David FreeBSD Tutorials @ http://freebsd.vangeyn.net On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Lane wrote: > Hey, thanks, David. > > So all I gotta do is (ugh) upgrade the hardware. At least on the internal > side. > > lane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 14:38:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C35916A420 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:38:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nuambenzina@yahoo.com) Received: from web61212.mail.yahoo.com (web61212.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.179.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BB4D43D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:38:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nuambenzina@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 9754 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Jul 2005 14:38:56 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=CkP7SifVqqSfV/1Crpj4ktqkvtqLWKpSu4+MKYtKtZeuZlIu95F1tCkGaSqFx+NrdpXGOtCgqFX94XL09SLoZnwKtiIQqadkPQ3qYlWQ7RIBjxEwizvPH2TgiipHWVFOJd6n6pn87OrwsWfGr3alFZ1jb1Yl66S+K/FHMcfUMVs= ; Message-ID: <20050727143856.9752.qmail@web61212.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [194.105.28.16] by web61212.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:38:56 PDT Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:38:56 -0700 (PDT) From: NuAm Benzina To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Courses X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:38:58 -0000 Do you have curses like "cisco rhce msce CCNA" , maybe for free ? With conciliate , Cuculici Marcel Ion __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 14:39:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A37E16A420 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:39:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benlutz@datacomm.ch) Received: from maxlor.mine.nu (c-213-160-32-54.customer.ggaweb.ch [213.160.32.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578DA43D49 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:39:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benlutz@datacomm.ch) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A40A3A1; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:39:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maxlor.mine.nu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (midgard [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21344-09; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:39:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from merlin.intranet (merlin.intranet [10.0.0.16]) by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C1EC1; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:39:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Benjamin Lutz To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:39:12 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1266737.UTpq9LBA3a"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200507271639.17254.benlutz@datacomm.ch> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at maxlor.mine.nu Cc: andre@sneakymustard.com Subject: Problems with make -j X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:39:20 -0000 --nextPart1266737.UTpq9LBA3a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hello, As a pet project I've started to change /etc/rc so it uses make(1) to=20 execute the scripts in /etc/rc.d instead of executing them one after the=20 other like the standard /etc/rc does. The goal of the project is to speed=20 up boot time by executing rc.d scripts in parallel. Now, if I don't specify a -j parameter this works just fine. I've written=20 a script that generates a Makefile with all the rc.d dependencies in it,=20 and using that the system boots just fine. As soon as I add a -j parameter to make, even -j 1, things break though.=20 Scripts (eg, rc.subr) are being spewed to the screen several times, and=20 execution hangs at /etc/rc.d/adjkerntz (I think). I can pipe all this to=20 a log file with > make.log 2>&1. By the time make gets to adjkerntz and I=20 ctrl-c it, the logfile is slightly above 3MB. Can anyone tell me why make behaves like this? If I had to guess I'd say=20 something's happening to the file descriptors, or something that make=20 needs for -j to work has not been set up. Btw, I have set up a memory=20 disk in /etc/tmp that make can use for -j (and I've patched make to use=20 that patch). Here's what I use in /etc/rc now: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D SNIPPET START =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D RC_MAKE=3D"1" if [ -z "$RC_MAKE" ]; then =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 skip=3D"-s nostart" =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 [ `/sbin/sysctl -n security.jail.jailed` -eq 1 ] && \ =A0 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0skip=3D"$skip -s nojail" =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 files=3D`rcorder ${skip} /etc/rc.d/* 2>/dev/null` =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 for _rc_elem in ${files}; do =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 run_rc_script ${_rc_elem} ${_boot} =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 done else =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 skip=3D"-DSKIP -DNOSTART" =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 [ `/sbin/sysctl -n security.jail.jailed` -eq 1 ] && \ =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0skip=3D"$skip -DNOJAIL" =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 /sbin/mdmfs -M -S -o sync -s 5m md0 /etc/tmp =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 /bin/rc_make -i -f /etc/Makefile ${skip} PARAM=3D${_boot} =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 /sbin/umount /dev/md0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 /sbin/mdconfig -d -u md0 fi =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D SNIPPET END =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Here's two example targets from the /etc/Makefile: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D SNIPPET START =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D abi! LOGIN archdep =2Eifdef !KEEP || NOJAIL =2Eifdef !SKIP || (!NOJAIL) =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 . /etc/rc.subr && run_rc_script /etc/rc.d/abi ${PARAM} =2Eendif =2Eendif accounting! mountcritremote =2Eifdef !KEEP || NOJAIL =2Eifdef !SKIP || (!NOJAIL) =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 . /etc/rc.subr && run_rc_script /etc/rc.d/accounting ${PARA= M} =2Eendif =2Eendif =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D SNIPPET END =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D This currently works. As soon as I add "-j 1" or "-j 2" to the rc_make=20 call above, I get the behaviour described above. Note that rc_make is standard make(1) except that TMPPAT has been changed=20 from /tmp to /etc/tmp. Cheers Benjamin --nextPart1266737.UTpq9LBA3a Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC55yVgShs4qbRdeQRAnNqAJ0Rn+sldnmhKz8lCmRQvntJ2/W7/wCfd710 3hVqvfU0LcbVw3Apl1kuBWU= =CtOa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1266737.UTpq9LBA3a-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 14:43:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3771416A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:43:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nuambenzina@yahoo.com) Received: from web61214.mail.yahoo.com (web61214.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.179.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ACB3B43D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:43:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nuambenzina@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 99546 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Jul 2005 14:43:08 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=LOoBQ3BEIrvkScXgPpOxESDD5xF58JGp/mJ8imyDhC5H4HIHXkN5K2kXye1KK0I0CaFhR527JYvcuaiw6YaPY6ST4/GO5bqHjbF5ErBGGUzIgfp1Q4nDuiTSFWQ1Em4YJj5uQODNBJGPpgATfTL4gZCuO7nCKLtQUPBUDzCVALg= ; Message-ID: <20050727144308.99544.qmail@web61214.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [194.105.28.16] by web61214.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:43:07 PDT Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:43:07 -0700 (PDT) From: NuAm Benzina To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: huh? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:43:09 -0000 Do you have curses like "cisco rhce msce CCNA" , maybe for free ? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 14:46:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9DC16A420 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:46:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@orbweavers.co.uk) Received: from mail.orbweavers.co.uk (213-152-38-100.dsl.eclipse.net.uk [213.152.38.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39EBF43D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:46:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@orbweavers.co.uk) Received: from www.orbweavers.co.uk (localhost.orbweavers.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) by mail.orbweavers.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1448B2B3D; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:46:22 +0100 (BST) Received: from 217.37.3.201 (SquirrelMail authenticated user martin) by www.orbweavers.co.uk with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:46:22 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <1234.217.37.3.201.1122475582.squirrel@www.orbweavers.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20050727143856.9752.qmail@web61212.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050727143856.9752.qmail@web61212.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:46:22 +0100 (BST) From: martin@orbweavers.co.uk To: "NuAm Benzina" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Courses X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:46:24 -0000 > Do you have curses like "cisco rhce msce CCNA" , maybe for free ? > > > With conciliate , > Cuculici Marcel > Ion I'm sure your email is generating plenty of free curses. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 14:47:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264E816A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:47:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@sigd.net) Received: from ms05.mailstreet2003.net (MS05.mailstreet2003.net [63.251.155.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E596C43D49 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:47:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@sigd.net) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Received: from 216.253.190.66 ([216.253.190.66]) by ms05.mailstreet2003.net ([10.0.25.5]) via Exchange Front-End Server owa.mailstreet2003.net ([10.0.25.4]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:45:45 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from home.sigd.net by owa.mailstreet2003.net; 27 Jul 2005 09:44:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20050727141838.58AD943D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org> References: <20050727141838.58AD943D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:44:36 -0400 Message-ID: <1122475476.84295.2.camel@localhost> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Sr. Compiler Engineering Opportunity Thread-Index: AcWSud7FqyitklF4RIaiwFZaL0z/nA== From: "Haulmark, Chris" To: "Nathan Sanders" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Sr. Compiler Engineering Opportunity X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Haulmark, Chris" List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:47:22 -0000 On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 07:20 -0700, Nathan Sanders wrote: > Hello- >=20 > I'm hoping to network with you and find out if you know anyone who=20 > you think could be interested in the following opportunity? >=20 >=20 > Sr. Compiler Engineer We have freebsd-jobs@freebsd.org for this purpose. freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list is for tech and general questions related to FreeBSD. Resend your email to freebsd-jobs@freebsd.org and good luck locating a desired new employee. Chris >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Nathan Sanders > Principal/Manager > Bridgenex LLC > 2464 El Camino Real #206 > Santa Clara, Ca 95051 > Office: 1.800.881.5733 > Email: nathan@bridgenex.com > Corporate: www.bridgenex.com >=20 > :::STAFFING CONLULTANT SERVICES FOR HIGH TECH::: >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 14:52:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A841516A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:52:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rebehn@ant.uni-bremen.de) Received: from antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de (antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de [134.102.176.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D36A43D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:52:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rebehn@ant.uni-bremen.de) Received: from bremerhaven.ant.uni-bremen.de ([134.102.176.10]) by antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de with esmtp (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1DxnH3-0003Hs-Ci; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:52:48 +0200 Message-ID: <42E79FFF.4010409@ant.uni-bremen.de> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:53:51 +0200 From: Heinrich Rebehn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050513 Debian/1.7.8-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi list, after upgrading isc-dhcp3-server to 3.0.3, my etherboot bootprom (5.4.0, PXE) stopped working. It reports "No IP Address". Has anyone else observed this? (I will also report this to the etherboot ML). [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.8 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts Subject: Problem with isc-dhcp3-server and etherboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:52:50 -0000 Hi list, after upgrading isc-dhcp3-server to 3.0.3, my etherboot bootprom (5.4.0, PXE) stopped working. It reports "No IP Address". Has anyone else observed this? (I will also report this to the etherboot ML). After downgrading the package to 3.0.1.r14_6, etherboot is working again. Some questions concerning portupgrade: - Is there any way to downgrade to a previous version? (In this case i was lucky that there still was an old binary package) - Is there any config file i can change to make '-b' the default for portupgrade? - I noticed that portupgrade stops dhcp before upgrading, but does not start it again afterwards. Is this expected behaviour? Thanks for your help, Heinrich Rebehn -- Heinrich Rebehn University of Bremen Physics / Electrical and Electronics Engineering - Department of Telecommunications - Phone : +49/421/218-4664 Fax : -3341 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 15:02:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58CE416A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:02:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from demigor@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A4A43D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:02:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from demigor@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so156671nzo for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:02:18 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=PdfOiiauud8qqf5fO7o53Jzn2PgWCal12MT4oHRjHNc88mLG3sj+Qc+R8VEh+3ZTQVYTATXLPbzy0LdyK/yi49orhuIq2i5pVVg/h3PjJ7/QI+wqZ43vS6X+g56iGvpPDrLcB0i4f6GrL7iQigZypl4sCzg4Tk5zU1ZGb9Z9MK4= Received: by 10.36.251.79 with SMTP id y79mr231994nzh; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:02:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.13.10 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:02:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:02:18 +0300 From: demigor To: Konrad Heuer In-Reply-To: <20050727134713.Y76649@gwdu60.gwdg.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20050727134713.Y76649@gwdu60.gwdg.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: demigor List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:02:19 -0000 >=20 > > How one could defragment a partition on FreeBSD ? Which tools are=20 > available > > for this ? >=20 > Why should you want to do this? There's no harmful fragmentation in > the UFS of FreeBSD unless you exceed the max capacity of 100% which is 92= % > when looking closer but reported as 100% by df. >=20 Thanks for the information. Asked just of curiosity :) br, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 15:07:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40AD16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:07:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@reusel.de) Received: from azure.internetking.de (internetking.de [213.239.216.77]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EEDE43D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:07:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@reusel.de) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (p54819B5E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.129.155.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by azure.internetking.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36031B26; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:07:37 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <42E79FFF.4010409@ant.uni-bremen.de> References: <42E79FFF.4010409@ant.uni-bremen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Message-Id: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Reisenweber?= Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:07:38 +0200 To: Heinrich Rebehn X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Problem with isc-dhcp3-server and etherboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:07:40 -0000 Moin Heinrich, Am 27.07.2005 um 16:53 schrieb Heinrich Rebehn: > - Is there any way to downgrade to a previous version? (In this =20 > case i was lucky that there still was an old binary package) I just saw portdowngrade (/usr/ports/sysutils/portdowngrade - http://=20 sourceforge.net/projects/portdowngrade/) in the ports collection. =20 Maybe it's worth a look. > - Is there any config file i can change to make '-b' the default =20 > for portupgrade? You may set the PORTUPGRADE variable in your environment according to =20= the portupgrade manpage. J=F6rg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 15:22:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD3916A420 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:22:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E9443D49 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:22:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.246.232] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A6A685B900BA; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:22:14 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6RFN5EB049424; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:23:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6RFMux8049423; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:22:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: "Ivan Carey" References: <000b01c5929c$bd4f9530$0201a8c0@IVAN> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:22:56 -0700 In-Reply-To: <000b01c5929c$bd4f9530$0201a8c0@IVAN> (Ivan Carey's message of "Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:17:12 +1000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KVM switch problem with mouse X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:22:20 -0000 "Ivan Carey" writes: > I'm using FreeBSD 5.3 > I'm using a MC2050, MC2060 2 port auto kvm switch. > My mouse does not work either at the console or in KDE, the keyboard is ok. > > Is there a command I need to place into the kernel to get the mouse driver > to recognise the mouse via the KVM switch? I'm using 3 ports of a four-port KVM (PS/2 mouse & kbd) and every thing works normally (except maybe some occasional video noise) without special OS configuration. Glad I got it. FreeBSD 4.8 & 5.4. As for your booting problem, it sounds like a hardware problem, but it might be related to power management. I suspect that if the MB returns to a bootup screen, and then hangs, then it is a MB problem. Maybe one that can be avoided by disable APM/ACPI in the OS, if you want it to auto-reboot without hanging. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 15:36:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E8F16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:36:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (ei.xs4all.nl [213.84.67.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E28A43D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:36:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6RFc5Lr031853; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:38:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6RFc50p031852; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:38:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:38:05 +0200 From: Ruben de Groot To: Heinrich Rebehn Message-ID: <20050727153805.GA31090@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , Heinrich Rebehn , freebsd-questions References: <42E79FFF.4010409@ant.uni-bremen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42E79FFF.4010409@ant.uni-bremen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=failed version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on ei.bzerk.org Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Problem with isc-dhcp3-server and etherboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:36:45 -0000 On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:53:51PM +0200, Heinrich Rebehn typed: > - I noticed that portupgrade stops dhcp before upgrading, but does not > start it again afterwards. Is this expected behaviour? Well, I certainly wasn't expecting this last time I upgraded dhcpd. Found out only days later when clients started dropping of the lan :-0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 15:39:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B04B16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:39:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C3A43D49 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:39:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7F960DA; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:39:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87624-10; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:39:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: by makeworld.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3112260E3; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:39:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A9260D4; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:39:16 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:39:16 -0500 (CDT) From: Chris To: NuAm Benzina In-Reply-To: <20050727144308.99544.qmail@web61214.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20050727103809.I87833@makeworld.com> References: <20050727144308.99544.qmail@web61214.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.2 (20050629) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: huh? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:39:19 -0000 On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, NuAm Benzina wrote: > Do you have curses like "cisco rhce msce CCNA" , maybe > for free ? YOU - are an idiot... Read the list name... FreeBSD Questions... When a person can't even take the time to READ something they subscribed to - others (such as myself) MUST point out the obvious... YOU - are an idiot... Best regards, Chris Show me a person who's never made a mistake and I'll show you somebody who's never achieved much. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 15:44:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DEAF16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:44:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F6343D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:44:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a4so55492nfc for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:44:04 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=pjo4g3I/gP7bvY6QU519NUThYmYUVB6Bw42BFIH68EYl9USHsrT0QYVCGx2hhZLdUDoZPtD2qJT/wnxGa94+/jbIWfkUsOgu+bURi3F+J1pEfMawgT+/YZiT39z8qm8lIk0agFEGxO5kDlGZdircWIS5nWLyBM8gVJY82LRySdU= Received: by 10.48.239.18 with SMTP id m18mr38225nfh; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.239.11 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:44:03 +0100 From: Freminlins To: FreeBSD Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Puzzling nfs/rpc log message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Freminlins List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:44:06 -0000 Hello, I have a number of FreeBSD machines mounting two NetApps via NFS. I updated one of the machines to 5.4 release. I have no prolems mounting the filers, but I am getting the following log entry every so often: Jul 27 16:36:33 fred rpcbind: connect from 192.168.1.5 to getport/addr(nlockmgr): request from unauthorized host I am only getting this for one of the filers. They are both accessed about the same amount, and are identically configured AFAIK. Can anyone shed any light on this? I've Googled a bit with no luck. Thanks, Frem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 16:26:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51BC116A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:26:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B3943D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:26:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 70so218962wra for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:26:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Bc8a9Mn+Smb3U5LlrHFNN9HCwJYBWnsKFUbpw55fSa8pB/fsd8E7pA/s5dGNxcYGDdr4XwVyBtHakhnhxvhIkIdGO74eTj5Nrf/8/EwEQeE59O5dPYpSEYKKXUgfW18VMgphzOBWrlPki+hjv9zGsJi/OKLv5gMjSIKniUqKTCQ= Received: by 10.54.120.4 with SMTP id s4mr401550wrc; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:26:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.113.3 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:26:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3aaaa3a050727092618c84914@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:26:10 +0100 From: Chris To: martin hudec In-Reply-To: <20050727105936.GA97664@amber.aeternal.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <491A44A6-1409-4D9E-AEFD-2B8665D52BA7@gmail.com> <20050727105936.GA97664@amber.aeternal.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Chris List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:26:14 -0000 I have diff experience, I get around 7500kB/sec max windows to windows using realtek, and freebsd can get the same but uses less cpu in doing so, I put it down to realtek just been poor and the FreeBSD and windows drivers not been great, I have seen both windows and FreeBSD handle higher transfer rates with better quality network cards, if performance is essential for your network then invest in good hardware. Chris On 27/07/05, martin hudec wrote: > Hello, >=20 > On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 03:13:50AM +0400 or thereabouts, Andrew P. wrote: > > Erm, well 60+Mbytes is no wonder in a Gigabit environment (and it is > > too much of a wonder in a FastEthernet one), but I'm interested in > > getting 100Mbit hardware to work at full speed. >=20 > If I take that your "NE2000 $10 NIC's" is what you call 100Mbit > hardware, then.. would you mind if I ask: what do you expect more from > such $10-harware other than just to flicker and to eat electric current? >=20 > Use *real* 100Mbit hardware please :). BTW I have same performance > with my sis900/rl8139 NIC's. >=20 > cheers, > Martin >=20 > -- > martin hudec >=20 >=20 > * 421 907 303 393 > * corwin@aeternal.net > * http://www.aeternal.net >=20 > "Nothing travels faster than the speed of light with the possible > exception of bad news, which obeys its own special laws." >=20 > Douglas Adams, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" >=20 >=20 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 16:53:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA19316A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:53:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cartman_step1@spymac.com) Received: from webmail3.spymac.net (webmail3.spymac.net [195.225.149.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5360D43D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:53:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cartman_step1@spymac.com) Received: from webmail3.spymac.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmail3.spymac.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8125C0040 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:53:10 -0600 (MDT) Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Origin: 217.133.130.9 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:53:10 -0600 X-Uidl: 1122472195.H354002P27552.mail-in1.spymac.net X-Mailer: AtMail 4.03 Message-Id: <20050727165310.DF8125C0040@webmail3.spymac.net> Subject: Re: sshd and pam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: cartman_step1@spymac.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:53:13 -0000 =0D =0D On Wed Jul 27 7:49 , Lowell Gilbert sent:=0D =0D >cartman_step1@spymac.com> writes:=0D >=0D >> Just i have a question about ssh and pam .=0D >> Trying to login on a machine with freebsd 5.4 from a machine in where i = run=0D >> fedora core 4 , i can't complete the operation . =0D >> The error is sshd[449] pam authentication error . What does it mean?How = i can set=0D >> pam to permit to login to freebsd and control the machine remotely?=0D >> I'm new to freebsd and i appreciate if anyone can help me to solve the p= roblem . =0D >=0D >Are you logging in as root? That's disabled by default.=0D >What kind of authentication are you using?=0D >_______________________________________________=0D yes i'm logging in as root , now i have understand , cause i can log in as = a=0D normal user . But then it's possible to log in as root , so i can administr= ate=0D remotely the machine on the lan?=0D >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list=0D >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions=0D >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g"=0D =0D =0D From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 17:01:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B222E16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:01:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC1243D55 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:01:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so221417wra for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:01:05 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uGHAYgVq6ZDrLZ+IkLmRZiaf3q7w8eSupRrozUj1AGkbwSnpa1JoR6Wwd0W3jDRS55j+UzH1OIJdNy/oxbnsnxkJkpdQ7i5x8tMNJ5XQpkvB5+JvQdzP8v79/lbSmmtzp9sy5RGQmVTE3W2VvazyJMk9sz13IIr0essxaKIt5zk= Received: by 10.54.45.14 with SMTP id s14mr421325wrs; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:01:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:01:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:01:05 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= In-Reply-To: <42E815EC.20309@t-hosting.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <42E69B11.6070208@t-hosting.hu> <42E815EC.20309@t-hosting.hu> Cc: FreeBSD - Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:01:06 -0000 On 7/27/05, K=F6vesd=E1n G=E1bor wrote: > Nikolas Britton wrote: >=20 > >On 7/26/05, K=F6vesd=E1n G=E1bor wrote: > > > > > >>Nikolas Britton wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Is it just me or is -O2 now the default for kernel builds? What about > >>>-Os, safe to use? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>So is it for me. But if I specify some CFLAGS, for example -O3 > >>-march=3Dathlon64, the > >>building fails, but CFLAGS mustn't affect the kernel compiling process > >>afaik. There is > >>COPTFLAGS for that reason. I've also made a PR about this new, unwanted > >>behaviour, > >>but haven't got any answers so yet. > >> > >> > >> > > > >You are right, COPTCLAGS is for the kernel only. -O3 is not officially > >supported for CFLAGS or COPTFLAGS. If you use -O3 for CFLAGS it will > >break some ports. Also from my experience using anything higher then > >CPUTYPE=3Dp2 will break ports (like gstreamer). > > > >This is what I normally add to my make.conf file: > >CPUTYPE=3Dp2 > >CFLAGS=3D -Os -pipes > >COPTFLAGS=3D -Os -pipes > >#CXXFLAGS=3D don't remember what I set this too, don't use it a lot. > > > >If I want a port to build with different settings I just tell it to > >inline... make CPUTYPE=3Dp4 install clean etc. > > > > > > > Yes, I know -O3 isn't supported for either, but I didn't mean ports. The > kernel building > fails with this: > CFLAGS=3D-O3 -march=3Dathlon64 > #COPTFLAGS=3D-O3 -march=3Dathlon64 <-This is commenred out! > And this breaks the kernel compiling. See this: >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D83995 Isn't their a way to overide any setting in make.conf by putting it ( -O flags ) inside the kernel config file, I seem to remember doing something like that in the passed. Or you could do it all inline again like: nice -20 make -j2 CYPUTYPE=3Dp4 "CFLAGS=3D -Os -pipe" KERNCONF=3DME_COLONEL buildkernel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 17:02:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81DD16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:02:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jlgomez@grupo-open.es) Received: from smtp2.grupo-open.net (bx4.grupo-open.net [82.144.21.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E552643D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:02:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jlgomez@grupo-open.es) Received: from sm1.grupo-open.local (sm1.grupo-open.local [172.20.1.1]) by smtp2.grupo-open.net MTA-Server with ESMTPœ id j6RH18xd060225 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:01:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jlgomez@grupo-open.es) Received: from puesto5 (puesto5.oficina.grupo-open.local [192.168.128.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by sm1.grupo-open.local (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6RH40J4055156 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:04:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jlgomez@grupo-open.es) Message-Id: <200507271704.j6RH40J4055156@sm1.grupo-open.local> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Luis_G=F3mez_Ferrer_de_Couto?= To: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:56:02 +0200 Organization: Grupo Open, S.L. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcWSxPL37cZIaZbqTKu/DloVYDAu2w== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-Grupo-Open-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean X-Grupo-Open-MailScanner-SpamScore: ss X-Grupo-Open-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-From: jlgomez@grupo-open.es Cc: Subject: Support ibcs2 (SCO) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: soporte@grupo-open.es List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:02:49 -0000 Hi all, I'm trying to run the ibcs2 module (an SCO emulator) in my BSD 5.4-RELEASE machine, and having a problem. I've previously tested it in 4.10, 4.11, 5.1 and 5.2.1 and it always worked like a charm. I'm getting the following error when trying to execute... module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (ibcs2, 0xc1700e90, 0) error 45 Problem is, I can't go back to any of those distributions because of some other issues with certain drivers. Checking this patch (ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-03:10.ibcs2.as c ) did not help either. Any ideas? (Sorry about the vague explanation... this is actually two guys, one with the problem and the other trying to translate it with basically no idea what for crying out loud is happening... yeah that's me :P) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 17:07:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1561816A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:07:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu (server.t-hosting.hu [217.20.133.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5E143D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:07:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F842997912; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:07:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.t-hosting.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 28354-02; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:07:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [80.98.156.20] (catv-50629c14.catv.broadband.hu [80.98.156.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56EFC997827; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:07:47 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E7BF43.1090901@t-hosting.hu> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:07:15 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nikolas Britton References: <42E69B11.6070208@t-hosting.hu> <42E815EC.20309@t-hosting.hu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Cc: FreeBSD - Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:07:53 -0000 Nikolas Britton wrote: >On 7/27/05, Kövesdán Gábor wrote: > > >>Nikolas Britton wrote: >> >> >> >>>On 7/26/05, Kövesdán Gábor wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Nikolas Britton wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Is it just me or is -O2 now the default for kernel builds? What about >>>>>-Os, safe to use? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>So is it for me. But if I specify some CFLAGS, for example -O3 >>>>-march=athlon64, the >>>>building fails, but CFLAGS mustn't affect the kernel compiling process >>>>afaik. There is >>>>COPTFLAGS for that reason. I've also made a PR about this new, unwanted >>>>behaviour, >>>>but haven't got any answers so yet. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>You are right, COPTCLAGS is for the kernel only. -O3 is not officially >>>supported for CFLAGS or COPTFLAGS. If you use -O3 for CFLAGS it will >>>break some ports. Also from my experience using anything higher then >>>CPUTYPE=p2 will break ports (like gstreamer). >>> >>>This is what I normally add to my make.conf file: >>>CPUTYPE=p2 >>>CFLAGS= -Os -pipes >>>COPTFLAGS= -Os -pipes >>>#CXXFLAGS= don't remember what I set this too, don't use it a lot. >>> >>>If I want a port to build with different settings I just tell it to >>>inline... make CPUTYPE=p4 install clean etc. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Yes, I know -O3 isn't supported for either, but I didn't mean ports. The >>kernel building >>fails with this: >>CFLAGS=-O3 -march=athlon64 >>#COPTFLAGS=-O3 -march=athlon64 <-This is commenred out! >>And this breaks the kernel compiling. See this: >> >>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=83995 >> >> > >Isn't their a way to overide any setting in make.conf by putting it ( >-O flags ) inside the kernel config file, I seem to remember doing >something like that in the passed. Or you could do it all inline again >like: nice -20 make -j2 CYPUTYPE=p4 "CFLAGS= -Os -pipe" >KERNCONF=ME_COLONEL buildkernel > > IIRC, the makeoptions option is to do this in the kernel config file. E.g. makeoptions MODULES_OVERRIDE="" to skip modules building. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 17:21:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7500216A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:21:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB72343D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:21:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.4+UW05.04/8.13.4+UW05.05) with ESMTP id j6RHLLnh017108 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:21:21 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [128.95.196.181] (dhcp196-181.ee.washington.edu [128.95.196.181]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.4+UW05.04/8.13.4+UW05.07) with ESMTP id j6RHLJk1013505 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:21:21 -0700 Message-ID: <42E7C292.8070808@u.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:21:22 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050727144308.99544.qmail@web61214.mail.yahoo.com> <20050727103809.I87833@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <20050727103809.I87833@makeworld.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: huh? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:21:22 -0000 Hmmm... I wonder if that was an honest question, or if it was done to illicit email addresses in some way =\... Just a random thought. Probably just an IT n00b that doesn't understand the scope of "cisco rhce msce CCNA", etc in relation to freebsd. *For* *NuAm*: What you listed in the email ("cisco rhce msce CCNA") are certification programs not involved with FreeBSD (directly at least at all) and this is a mailing list for questions from users for users about FreeBSD-a complete Unix operating system, in and of itself. Hopefully that clarifies something for you. -Garrett Chris wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, NuAm Benzina wrote: > >> Do you have curses like "cisco rhce msce CCNA" , maybe >> for free ? > > > YOU - are an idiot... Read the list name... FreeBSD Questions... > When a person can't even take the time to READ something they > subscribed to - others (such as myself) MUST point out the obvious... > > YOU - are an idiot... > > > Best regards, > Chris > > Show me a person who's never made a mistake and I'll > show you somebody who's never achieved much. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 17:38:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757A016A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:38:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158E543D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:38:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.4+UW05.04/8.13.4+UW05.05) with ESMTP id j6RHcBWA024013 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:38:11 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [128.95.196.181] (dhcp196-181.ee.washington.edu [128.95.196.181]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.4+UW05.04/8.13.4+UW05.07) with ESMTP id j6RHcAft019610 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:38:11 -0700 Message-ID: <42E7C685.4080405@u.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:38:13 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:38:12 -0000 Chris wrote: > I have diff experience, I get around 7500kB/sec max windows to windows > using realtek, and freebsd can get the same but uses less cpu in doing > so, I put it down to realtek just been poor and the FreeBSD and > windows drivers not been great, I have seen both windows and FreeBSD > handle higher transfer rates with better quality network cards, if > performance is essential for your network then invest in good > hardware. > > Chris > > On 27/07/05, martin hudec wrote: > > >> Hello, >> >> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 03:13:50AM +0400 or thereabouts, Andrew P. >> wrote: >> >> >>> Erm, well 60+Mbytes is no wonder in a Gigabit environment (and it is >>> too much of a wonder in a FastEthernet one), but I'm interested in >>> getting 100Mbit hardware to work at full speed. >>> >> >> If I take that your "NE2000 $10 NIC's" is what you call 100Mbit >> hardware, then.. would you mind if I ask: what do you expect more from >> such $10-harware other than just to flicker and to eat electric current? >> >> Use *real* 100Mbit hardware please :) . BTW I have same performance >> with my sis900/rl8139 NIC's. >> >> cheers, >> Martin >> >> -- >> martin hudec >> >> >> * 421 907 303 393 >> * corwin@aeternal.net >> * http://www.aeternal.net >> >> "Nothing travels faster than the speed of light with the possible >> exception of bad news, which obeys its own special laws." >> >> Douglas Adams, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" >> > Haha... Samba's a given. It's always slow as hell. HTTP... hmmm. What server are you serving HTTP traffic with and what are the stats of the server hardware/load and also which client are you using to connect to the server? But the real question is what sort of CPU speed/RAM/HD speeds and what version(s) of each OS are using in your machines? Performance can vary greatly with these factors. If you don't like Samba, try SFU's NFS thanks to MS . One of the only decent things that MS has come out with ever. When communicating with 2 machines (Windows client, FreeBSD/Linux server) I had very little lag and things got close to the full 10Mb/s I think (didn't empirically measure the value). You can also use Cygwin based NFS if you only want a client and not a server. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 18:11:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743D716A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:11:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry.mityugov@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B64643D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:11:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry.mityugov@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so234708wra for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:11:03 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nw38SqewEHl9/GaTWB04HGAdqrmLLITeNvrjS7IPh+1n62BLLZFM2smkuOSxfc8PtSgCACRt1GzXviXE77ANHCs4pzoDdlVpPwszhT3oOqDH1gglecFMEC1zsE/RXSJD8rzrhuHag+WuImA0dePF+920dOUq3MqNY0sc1fWbu44= Received: by 10.54.11.11 with SMTP id 11mr437616wrk; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.56.33 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:11:03 +0400 From: Dmitry Mityugov To: NuAm Benzina In-Reply-To: <20050727144308.99544.qmail@web61214.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050727144308.99544.qmail@web61214.mail.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: huh? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dmitry Mityugov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:11:04 -0000 On 7/27/05, NuAm Benzina wrote: > Do you have curses like "cisco rhce msce CCNA" , maybe > for free ? It's my understanding that there is some work in progress, as recent message titled "Task Analysis Survey Report published by The BSD Certification Group" posted in the advocacy link indicates. Please let me know if you need a direct link to it. Search Google for "freebsd certification site:freebsd.org" for additional information. --=20 Dmitry Mityugov, St. Petersburg, Russia I ignore all messages with confidentiality statements "We live less by imagination than despite it" - Rockwell Kent, "N by E" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 18:20:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07EB816A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:20:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F0643D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:20:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 20659 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2005 18:20:53 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Jul 2005 18:20:53 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 999CE2A; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:20:52 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: cartman_step1@spymac.com References: <20050727165310.DF8125C0040@webmail3.spymac.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 27 Jul 2005 14:20:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050727165310.DF8125C0040@webmail3.spymac.net> Message-ID: <44y87srtyz.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sshd and pam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:20:54 -0000 [Message reformatted.] writes: > yes i'm logging in as root , now i have understand , cause i can log > in as a normal user . But then it's possible to log in as root , so > i can administrate remotely the machine on the lan? su(8). [personally, I'm fond of sudo, which is in the ports] Letting root log in directly leaves you with no audit trail, and a single point of failure in your security scheme. You can configure sshd to let root log in, but I don't generally advise it for a network on the Internet. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 18:24:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B002316A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:24:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maarfree@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF9743D6E for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:24:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maarfree@xs4all.nl) Received: from maarten.sandersatkins.nl (a80-127-55-226.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.127.55.226]) by smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6RIO6X3070322 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:24:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from maarfree@xs4all.nl) From: Maarten Sanders To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050727165310.DF8125C0040@webmail3.spymac.net> References: <20050727165310.DF8125C0040@webmail3.spymac.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:24:06 +0200 Message-Id: <1122488646.4854.1.camel@maarten> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: Re: sshd and pam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:24:15 -0000 Try first to login as a user who is member of group wheel and then 'su'. See if that works, root login is mostly disabled for security reasons. Maarten On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 10:53 -0600, cartman_step1@spymac.com wrote: > > On Wed Jul 27 7:49 , Lowell Gilbert sent: > > >cartman_step1@spymac.com> writes: > > > >> Just i have a question about ssh and pam . > >> Trying to login on a machine with freebsd 5.4 from a machine in where i run > >> fedora core 4 , i can't complete the operation . > >> The error is sshd[449] pam authentication error . What does it mean?How i can set > >> pam to permit to login to freebsd and control the machine remotely? > >> I'm new to freebsd and i appreciate if anyone can help me to solve the problem . > > > >Are you logging in as root? That's disabled by default. > >What kind of authentication are you using? > >_______________________________________________ > yes i'm logging in as root , now i have understand , cause i can log in as a > normal user . But then it's possible to log in as root , so i can administrate > remotely the machine on the lan? > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 18:48:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892FB16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:48:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from creep@daedalus.desk.pl) Received: from daedalus.desk.pl (daedalus.desk.pl [62.233.238.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243D943D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:48:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from creep@daedalus.desk.pl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daedalus.desk.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E0E36651A for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:38:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from daedalus.desk.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (daedalus [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00741-05 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:38:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by daedalus.desk.pl (Postfix, from userid 1023) id 38F97366510; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:38:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:38:22 +0200 From: Marcin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050727183822.GA30480@daedalus.desk.pl> References: <20050727172134.409FA16A452@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050727172134.409FA16A452@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Antivirus: Skaner Antywirusowy DESK.pl Subject: FreeBSD file system example and question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:48:02 -0000 Hello, where can i find information or examples of how to write a file system for FreeBSD, apart from /usr/src/sys/* and /usr/share/man/*? What is vnode_if.h for? Why is it generated for every fs module if it is the same every time? I tried to google for the answer but found nothing. Only a note on Darwin's dev site. Thanks, m. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 18:49:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF3C416A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:49:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry.mityugov@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2990143D66 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:48:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry.mityugov@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so241092wra for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:48:58 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=p965IYtD68My0dsB4AVnGDRpv8rjJHMcuQhcoWg7QPg6M/RWj7e3X5Jc+b5WZUS/wJh54hWhpKbqZZpMgVravODDl7aZsSmgPN4jIbTqOwWLi4bHTSRdDy2HOkSaKlB6RJmnnpSZJea/nwxfV/4ZwpdRI4L2sLybU8yfURDTDoU= Received: by 10.54.11.64 with SMTP id 64mr249965wrk; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:48:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.56.33 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:48:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:48:56 +0400 From: Dmitry Mityugov To: demigor In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050727134713.Y76649@gwdu60.gwdg.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dmitry Mityugov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:49:03 -0000 On 7/27/05, demigor wrote: > > > > > How one could defragment a partition on FreeBSD ? Which tools are > > available > > > for this ? > > > > Why should you want to do this? There's no harmful fragmentation in > > the UFS of FreeBSD unless you exceed the max capacity of 100% which is = 92% > > when looking closer but reported as 100% by df. > > >=20 > Thanks for the information. Asked just of curiosity :) Anyway, you can just back up files on that partition, recreate the partition, restore the files (sequentially) - voila, they'll be defragmented. --=20 Dmitry Mityugov, St. Petersburg, Russia I ignore all messages with confidentiality statements "We live less by imagination than despite it" - Rockwell Kent, "N by E" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 19:01:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCBC16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:01:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@reusel.de) Received: from azure.internetking.de (internetking.de [213.239.216.77]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D9543D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:01:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@reusel.de) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (p54819B5E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.129.155.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by azure.internetking.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A8F1AFC; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:01:18 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20050727165310.DF8125C0040@webmail3.spymac.net> References: <20050727165310.DF8125C0040@webmail3.spymac.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Message-Id: <962A1C75-F3EF-4077-BB32-4555DEE97CE0@reusel.de> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Reisenweber?= Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:01:17 +0200 To: cartman_step1@spymac.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sshd and pam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:01:22 -0000 Hi, Am 27.07.2005 um 18:53 schrieb =20 : > yes i'm logging in as root , now i have understand , cause i can =20 > log in as a > normal user . But then it's possible to log in as root , so i can =20 > administrate > remotely the machine on the lan? > Yes, login as a normal user and su to root ('su -'). The normal user =20 has to be in the wheel group ('pw usermod [name|uid] -G wheel'). You =20 may also set "PermitRootLogin yes" in /etc/ssh/sshd_config. You might =20= also want to read the sshd_config manpage. J=F6rg= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 19:17:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15A2F16A420 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:17:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@dylangoss.com) Received: from server20.olicentral.com (server20.olicentral.com [216.121.191.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900F543D49 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:17:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@dylangoss.com) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server20.olicentral.com (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id j6RJGwG28374 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:16:58 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <234FB55B-4315-4AE0-AED4-C2627B0FBD57@dylangoss.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: FreeBSD questions From: "D. Goss" Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:16:59 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) Subject: SCSI RAID management under FreeBSD 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:17:05 -0000 I've done a bit of searching but I haven't found exactly what I'm after. As I understand it there is no way RAID management software for the IBM (Adaptec) ServeRAID cards (5i, specifically) that runs on FreeBSD (5.x). I have also read from the list archives that the Linux management software that exists for the IBM ServeRAID cards will not run under Linux mode in FreeBSD. Consedering that, I'm looking for an U320 SCSI RAID card (supports RAID-5 and hot spares) that has decent management software that can run on FreeBSD 5. Can anyone who knows of a setup like this please refer me to a specific card and software? Thanks - d. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 19:25:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C3416A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:25:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aman@chamkila.org) Received: from manak.chamkila.org (c-24-4-168-13.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.168.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C58B43D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:25:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aman@chamkila.org) Received: from [192.168.96.207] ([69.36.228.194]) by manak.chamkila.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6RJOlOv025496; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:24:48 -0700 Message-ID: <42E7DEF2.40607@chamkila.org> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:22:26 -0700 From: Amandeep User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "D. Goss" References: <234FB55B-4315-4AE0-AED4-C2627B0FBD57@dylangoss.com> In-Reply-To: <234FB55B-4315-4AE0-AED4-C2627B0FBD57@dylangoss.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: SCSI RAID management under FreeBSD 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:25:16 -0000 D. Goss wrote: > I've done a bit of searching but I haven't found exactly what I'm > after. As I understand it there is no way RAID management software > for the IBM (Adaptec) ServeRAID cards (5i, specifically) that runs on > FreeBSD (5.x). I have also read from the list archives that the > Linux management software that exists for the IBM ServeRAID cards > will not run under Linux mode in FreeBSD. > > Consedering that, I'm looking for an U320 SCSI RAID card (supports > RAID-5 and hot spares) that has decent management software that can > run on FreeBSD 5. Can anyone who knows of a setup like this please > refer me to a specific card and software? > > Thanks - > d. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Megaraid 320-2X Dual channel. thye have the Software on their web www.lsilogic.com. Drivers are inbuilt in stock kernel FreeBSD 5.3 and 5.4 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 19:32:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4519D16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:32:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mpsouza@centroin.com.br) Received: from gorgo.centroin.com.br (gorgo.centroin.com.br [200.225.63.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A2043D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:32:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mpsouza@centroin.com.br) Received: from hypselo.centroin.com.br (hypselo.centroin.com.br [200.225.63.1]) by gorgo.centroin.com.br (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j6RJWmea013554; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:32:49 -0300 (EST) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:32:48 -0300 (EST) From: Sender: To: "Gary W. Swearingen" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hardware monitor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: scuba@centroin.com.br List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:32:53 -0000 Gary, You're right. I could recompile the kernel now, however lmmon is not returning any value, neither healthd is. The relevant part of dmesg is: ichsmb0: port 0xefa0-0xefaf irq 17 at device 31.3 on pci0 smbus0: on ichsmb0 smb0: on smbus0 - Marcelo Souza On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: | writes: | |> |device ichsmb |> | |> | |> |I get this error messages: |> | |> |In file included from /usr/src/sys/dev/ichsmb/ichsmb.c:64: |> |/usr/src/sys/dev/ichsmb/ichsmb_var.h:44:22: smbus_if.h: No such file or | |Looks like you forgot to read the ichsmb manpage or the conf/NOTES |file which says you need certain other device entries too. |_______________________________________________ |freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list |http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions |To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" | - Marcelo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 20:25:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 792A816A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:25:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsdbeni@spymac.com) Received: from xizor.is.scarlet.be (xizor.is.scarlet.be [193.74.71.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7AB443D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:25:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsdbeni@spymac.com) Received: from ([80.236.195.122]) by xizor.is.scarlet.be with ESMTP id j6RKPQK27999 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:25:26 +0200 From: FreeBsdBeni To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:24:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1219638.oYTFWBhMBe"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200507272225.07899.freebsdbeni@spymac.com> Subject: Reading the volume-id/label of a cd/dvd ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:25:29 -0000 --nextPart1219638.oYTFWBhMBe Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi all, Is there an easy way to get to know the volume id or disclabel of a cd or=20 dvd ? Mounting the cd/dvd just gives me the contents of the disc, but not i= ts=20 "name". In k3b one can ask the info about a disc and get all the info about the=20 inserted cd/dvd (disc type, tracks, sessions,...). But how do i get that in= fo=20 without k3b ? Is there an easy way/solution ? Thanks ! =2D-=20 Beni. --nextPart1219638.oYTFWBhMBe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC5+2j98oeEzEDrEcRAm6wAJ40P84WLFQZGS8l7NRNYzjrXJDFBQCeMfoY 53ul5IKNWD7bkT1GoxXuzPk= =UwiG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1219638.oYTFWBhMBe-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 20:33:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FF516A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:33:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (hobbiton.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0001843D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:33:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.161.222.227] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1Dxsab-000BiP-Hz; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:33:17 -0600 In-Reply-To: <234FB55B-4315-4AE0-AED4-C2627B0FBD57@dylangoss.com> References: <234FB55B-4315-4AE0-AED4-C2627B0FBD57@dylangoss.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <5F971020-DFD0-408D-AD87-61E36FA54C52@shire.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:33:17 -0600 To: D. Goss X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.161.222.227 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: SCSI RAID management under FreeBSD 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:33:19 -0000 On Jul 27, 2005, at 1:16 PM, D. Goss wrote: > I've done a bit of searching but I haven't found exactly what I'm > after. As I understand it there is no way RAID management software > for the IBM (Adaptec) ServeRAID cards (5i, specifically) that runs > on FreeBSD (5.x). I have also read from the list archives that the > Linux management software that exists for the IBM ServeRAID cards > will not run under Linux mode in FreeBSD. What is the Adaptec model for this IBM card? Most of the standard Adaptec cards seem to have SW that works. Chad > > Consedering that, I'm looking for an U320 SCSI RAID card (supports > RAID-5 and hot spares) that has decent management software that can > run on FreeBSD 5. Can anyone who knows of a setup like this please > refer me to a specific card and software? > > Thanks - > d. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad@shire.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 20:45:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 416F316A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:45:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aman@chamkila.org) Received: from manak.chamkila.org (c-24-4-168-13.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.168.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F9343D5F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:45:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aman@chamkila.org) Received: from [192.168.96.207] ([69.36.228.194]) by manak.chamkila.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6RKiZOv027212; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:44:35 -0700 Message-ID: <42E7F1A3.1070503@chamkila.org> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:42:11 -0700 From: Amandeep User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "D. Goss" , FreeBSD questions References: <234FB55B-4315-4AE0-AED4-C2627B0FBD57@dylangoss.com> <42E7DEF2.40607@chamkila.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: SCSI RAID management under FreeBSD 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:45:03 -0000 D. Goss wrote: > > On Jul 27, 2005, at 12:22 PM, Amandeep wrote: > >> D. Goss wrote: >> >> >>> I've done a bit of searching but I haven't found exactly what I'm >>> after. As I understand it there is no way RAID management software >>> for the IBM (Adaptec) ServeRAID cards (5i, specifically) that runs >>> on FreeBSD (5.x). I have also read from the list archives that >>> the Linux management software that exists for the IBM ServeRAID >>> cards will not run under Linux mode in FreeBSD. >>> >>> Consedering that, I'm looking for an U320 SCSI RAID card (supports >>> RAID-5 and hot spares) that has decent management software that can >>> run on FreeBSD 5. Can anyone who knows of a setup like this please >>> refer me to a specific card and software? >>> >>> Thanks - >>> d. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>> mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org >>> " >>> >>> >> Megaraid 320-2X Dual channel. thye have the Software on their web >> www.lsilogic.com. Drivers are inbuilt in stock kernel FreeBSD 5.3 >> and 5.4 > > > Thanks for the quick reply. I went to the page and have been looking > at their software. I do see that there are drivers. I can't locate > any management software though, do you know what the name of the > product is? (are you using it?) -- > > thanks - > d. > It has CLI. Megaraid SCSI 320-2X http://www.lsilogic.com/downloads/license.do;jsessionid=D77ED5170B5693A7E71E21D60864C02C?id=2000&did=8625&pid=2407 If you unpack the zip file you'll get MegaRC zip file upzip it and then do chmod 755 megarc and then run ./megarc ? You/all get al ist of comands for managing the RAID. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 21:03:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39D316A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:03:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@dylangoss.com) Received: from server20.olicentral.com (server20.olicentral.com [216.121.191.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D8843D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:03:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@dylangoss.com) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server20.olicentral.com (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id j6RL3ZG25685; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:03:35 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) In-Reply-To: <5F971020-DFD0-408D-AD87-61E36FA54C52@shire.net> References: <234FB55B-4315-4AE0-AED4-C2627B0FBD57@dylangoss.com> <5F971020-DFD0-408D-AD87-61E36FA54C52@shire.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "D. Goss" Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:03:32 -0700 To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" , FreeBSD questions , Amandeep X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) Cc: Subject: Re: SCSI RAID management under FreeBSD 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:03:49 -0000 On Jul 27, 2005, at 1:33 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > > On Jul 27, 2005, at 1:16 PM, D. Goss wrote: > > >> I've done a bit of searching but I haven't found exactly what I'm >> after. As I understand it there is no way RAID management >> software for the IBM (Adaptec) ServeRAID cards (5i, specifically) >> that runs on FreeBSD (5.x). I have also read from the list >> archives that the Linux management software that exists for the >> IBM ServeRAID cards will not run under Linux mode in FreeBSD. >> > > What is the Adaptec model for this IBM card? Most of the standard > Adaptec cards seem to have SW that works. First, apologies, my fingers slipped - the card is a 6i. I have been unable to locate the Adapec equivalent and I've even seen that some cards have been made for them by LSI - the chipset on the mobo (xSeries 345) is from LSI. But in fact the box this card came in has both the IBM and Adaptec logos so this one is indeed from Adaptec. There is a P/N 13N2190 but I can't match it with Adaptec and think it's an IBM number. > It has CLI. Megaraid SCSI 320-2X > > http://www.lsilogic.com/downloads/ > license.do;jsessionid=D77ED5170B5693A7E71E21D60864C02C? > id=2000&did=8625&pid=2407 > > If you unpack the zip file you'll get MegaRC zip file upzip it and > then do chmod 755 megarc and then run ./megarc ? > You/all get al ist of comands for managing the RAID. This is great - if indeed i can't get the Adaptec to work, i'll have to look into the Megaraid (LSI) card. Thank you. I'd of course greatly prefer to find something that works with the card that I own... :) d. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 21:08:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE8516A41F; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:08:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from virenp@mail.utexas.edu) Received: from smtp.cm.utexas.edu (smtp.cm.utexas.edu [146.6.135.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED9443D48; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:08:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from virenp@mail.utexas.edu) Received: from mail.cm.utexas.edu (smtp.cm.utexas.edu [146.6.135.3]) by smtp.cm.utexas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A615D6D48F; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:08:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 146.6.178.5 (SquirrelMail authenticated user vpatel) by mail.cm.utexas.edu with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:08:14 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <37675.146.6.178.5.1122498494.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:08:14 -0500 (CDT) From: "Viren Patel" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: apache13-modssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 port broken?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: virenp@mail.utexas.edu List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:08:15 -0000 I am trying to install apache+mod_ssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 and get the following: #make ===> apache+mod_ssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 has known vulnerabilities: => apache -- http request smuggling. Reference: => Please update your ports tree and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/apache13-modssl. I have updated the ports tree and the files directory contains the patch for this vulnerability (patch-secfix-CAN-2005-2088). I need to install this port urgently. What am I doing wrong?? If the vulnerability has not been fixed, how can I force install? TIA. -- Viren From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 21:08:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B89916A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:08:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (hobbiton.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D097343D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:08:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.161.222.227] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1Dxt8j-000DNE-Uv; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:08:34 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: <234FB55B-4315-4AE0-AED4-C2627B0FBD57@dylangoss.com> <5F971020-DFD0-408D-AD87-61E36FA54C52@shire.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:08:33 -0600 To: D. Goss X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.161.222.227 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: SCSI RAID management under FreeBSD 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:08:35 -0000 On Jul 27, 2005, at 3:03 PM, D. Goss wrote: > On Jul 27, 2005, at 1:33 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > > >> >> On Jul 27, 2005, at 1:16 PM, D. Goss wrote: >> >> >> >>> I've done a bit of searching but I haven't found exactly what I'm >>> after. As I understand it there is no way RAID management >>> software for the IBM (Adaptec) ServeRAID cards (5i, specifically) >>> that runs on FreeBSD (5.x). I have also read from the list >>> archives that the Linux management software that exists for the >>> IBM ServeRAID cards will not run under Linux mode in FreeBSD. >>> >>> >> >> What is the Adaptec model for this IBM card? Most of the standard >> Adaptec cards seem to have SW that works. >> > > First, apologies, my fingers slipped - the card is a 6i. I have > been unable to locate the Adapec equivalent and I've even seen that > some cards have been made for them by LSI - the chipset on the mobo > (xSeries 345) is from LSI. But in fact the box this card came in > has both the IBM and Adaptec logos so this one is indeed from Adaptec. > > There is a P/N 13N2190 but I can't match it with Adaptec and think > it's an IBM number. I assume the card "works", just that you have no management software for it? If so, what device does it come up under? What does the dmesg look like? Chad > > >> It has CLI. Megaraid SCSI 320-2X >> >> http://www.lsilogic.com/downloads/ >> license.do;jsessionid=D77ED5170B5693A7E71E21D60864C02C? >> id=2000&did=8625&pid=2407 >> >> If you unpack the zip file you'll get MegaRC zip file upzip it and >> then do chmod 755 megarc and then run ./megarc ? >> You/all get al ist of comands for managing the RAID. >> > > This is great - if indeed i can't get the Adaptec to work, i'll > have to look into the Megaraid (LSI) card. Thank you. > > I'd of course greatly prefer to find something that works with the > card that I own... :) > > d. > --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad@shire.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 21:19:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48EB16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:19:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@dylangoss.com) Received: from server20.olicentral.com (server20.olicentral.com [216.121.191.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA9443D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:19:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@dylangoss.com) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server20.olicentral.com (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id j6RLJEG07835; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:19:14 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) In-Reply-To: References: <234FB55B-4315-4AE0-AED4-C2627B0FBD57@dylangoss.com> <5F971020-DFD0-408D-AD87-61E36FA54C52@shire.net> Message-Id: <7FA820FE-3943-4DF9-B515-24E40D34509F@dylangoss.com> From: "D. Goss" Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:19:05 -0700 To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" , FreeBSD questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: SCSI RAID management under FreeBSD 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:19:22 -0000 On Jul 27, 2005, at 2:08 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: >>> What is the Adaptec model for this IBM card? Most of the >>> standard Adaptec cards seem to have SW that works. >>> >>> >> >> First, apologies, my fingers slipped - the card is a 6i. I have >> been unable to locate the Adapec equivalent and I've even seen >> that some cards have been made for them by LSI - the chipset on >> the mobo (xSeries 345) is from LSI. But in fact the box this card >> came in has both the IBM and Adaptec logos so this one is indeed >> from Adaptec. >> >> There is a P/N 13N2190 but I can't match it with Adaptec and think >> it's an IBM number. >> > > I assume the card "works", just that you have no management > software for it? > > If so, what device does it come up under? What does the dmesg look > like? > > Chad Yes, the card works fine - it's only been installed for a short while. IBM has a bootable CD (forgot if it's Linux or Windows) that I was able to the original config. from. This will ultimately be a production server that I aim to have up as close to 24/7 as possible - and it will be remotely located - so i was searching for something other than the CD tools in order to check status, etc. with system up. Here is the dmesg section pertaining to the card: ips0: mem 0xe8000000-0xebffffff, 0xe7fff000-0xe7ffffff irq 18 at device 2.0 on pci8 ips0: [GIANT-LOCKED] -- snip -- ips0: resetting adapter, this may take up to 5 minutes ips0: adapter type: ServeRAID 6i (sebring) ips0: logical drives: 2 ips0: Logical Drive 0: RAID0 sectors: 71096320, state OK ips0: Logical Drive 1: RAID5 sectors: 142192640, state OK ipsd0: on ips0 ipsd0: Logical Drive (34715MB) ipsd1: on ips0 ipsd1: Logical Drive (69430MB) thanks - d. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 21:24:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE9616A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:24:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aman@chamkila.org) Received: from manak.chamkila.org (c-24-4-168-13.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.168.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A77043D5D for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:24:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aman@chamkila.org) Received: from [192.168.96.207] ([69.36.228.194]) by manak.chamkila.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6RLNkOv028095; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:23:46 -0700 Message-ID: <42E7FAD4.90303@chamkila.org> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:21:24 -0700 From: Amandeep User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "D. Goss" References: <234FB55B-4315-4AE0-AED4-C2627B0FBD57@dylangoss.com> <5F971020-DFD0-408D-AD87-61E36FA54C52@shire.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD questions , "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Subject: Re: SCSI RAID management under FreeBSD 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:24:14 -0000 D. Goss wrote: > On Jul 27, 2005, at 1:33 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > >> >> On Jul 27, 2005, at 1:16 PM, D. Goss wrote: >> >> >>> I've done a bit of searching but I haven't found exactly what I'm >>> after. As I understand it there is no way RAID management software >>> for the IBM (Adaptec) ServeRAID cards (5i, specifically) that runs >>> on FreeBSD (5.x). I have also read from the list archives that the >>> Linux management software that exists for the IBM ServeRAID cards >>> will not run under Linux mode in FreeBSD. >>> >> >> What is the Adaptec model for this IBM card? Most of the standard >> Adaptec cards seem to have SW that works. > > > First, apologies, my fingers slipped - the card is a 6i. I have been > unable to locate the Adapec equivalent and I've even seen that some > cards have been made for them by LSI - the chipset on the mobo > (xSeries 345) is from LSI. But in fact the box this card came in has > both the IBM and Adaptec logos so this one is indeed from Adaptec. > > There is a P/N 13N2190 but I can't match it with Adaptec and think > it's an IBM number. > >> It has CLI. Megaraid SCSI 320-2X >> >> http://www.lsilogic.com/downloads/ >> license.do;jsessionid=D77ED5170B5693A7E71E21D60864C02C? >> id=2000&did=8625&pid=2407 >> >> If you unpack the zip file you'll get MegaRC zip file upzip it and >> then do chmod 755 megarc and then run ./megarc ? >> You/all get al ist of comands for managing the RAID. > > > This is great - if indeed i can't get the Adaptec to work, i'll have > to look into the Megaraid (LSI) card. Thank you. > > I'd of course greatly prefer to find something that works with the > card that I own... :) > > d. Adpatec guys has very lil support for BSD's. So doubt it, but anyways good luck. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 21:25:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45D916A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:25:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (hobbiton.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE7743D5F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:24:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.161.222.227] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1DxtOX-000E8L-V8; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:24:54 -0600 In-Reply-To: <7FA820FE-3943-4DF9-B515-24E40D34509F@dylangoss.com> References: <234FB55B-4315-4AE0-AED4-C2627B0FBD57@dylangoss.com> <5F971020-DFD0-408D-AD87-61E36FA54C52@shire.net> <7FA820FE-3943-4DF9-B515-24E40D34509F@dylangoss.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <049E89CF-67DF-41AB-ACEF-1EDD7C0643C7@shire.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:24:52 -0600 To: D. Goss X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.161.222.227 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: SCSI RAID management under FreeBSD 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:25:01 -0000 On Jul 27, 2005, at 3:19 PM, D. Goss wrote: > On Jul 27, 2005, at 2:08 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > >>>> What is the Adaptec model for this IBM card? Most of the >>>> standard Adaptec cards seem to have SW that works. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> First, apologies, my fingers slipped - the card is a 6i. I have >>> been unable to locate the Adapec equivalent and I've even seen >>> that some cards have been made for them by LSI - the chipset on >>> the mobo (xSeries 345) is from LSI. But in fact the box this >>> card came in has both the IBM and Adaptec logos so this one is >>> indeed from Adaptec. >>> >>> There is a P/N 13N2190 but I can't match it with Adaptec and >>> think it's an IBM number. >>> >> >> I assume the card "works", just that you have no management >> software for it? >> >> If so, what device does it come up under? What does the dmesg >> look like? >> >> Chad > > Yes, the card works fine - it's only been installed for a short > while. IBM has a bootable CD (forgot if it's Linux or Windows) > that I was able to the original config. from. This will ultimately > be a production server that I aim to have up as close to 24/7 as > possible - and it will be remotely located - so i was searching for > something other than the CD tools in order to check status, etc. > with system up. > > Here is the dmesg section pertaining to the card: > > ips0: mem 0xe8000000-0xebffffff, > 0xe7fff000-0xe7ffffff irq 18 at device 2.0 on pci8 A quick look at man ips seems to show that that is its own thing. You may wish to email the driver writer at the bottom of the man page for this to ask about compatibility etc. I do know that aac and asr based drivers for Adaptec cards do have CLI RAID configuration and utility software that runs on FreeBSD good luck Chad > ips0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > -- snip -- > > ips0: resetting adapter, this may take up to 5 minutes > ips0: adapter type: ServeRAID 6i (sebring) > ips0: logical drives: 2 > ips0: Logical Drive 0: RAID0 sectors: 71096320, state OK > ips0: Logical Drive 1: RAID5 sectors: 142192640, state OK > ipsd0: on ips0 > ipsd0: Logical Drive (34715MB) > ipsd1: on ips0 > ipsd1: Logical Drive (69430MB) > > thanks - > d. > > --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad@shire.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 21:30:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2B416A41F; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:30:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahnke@fmjassoc.com) Received: from smtp.wizwire.com (smtp.wizwire.com [209.218.100.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A064A43D48; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:30:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahnke@fmjassoc.com) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (209.218.101.53.bvi2.wizwire.com [209.218.101.53]) by smtp.wizwire.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6RLTUVR002423; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:29:30 -0700 From: Frank Jahnke To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1122499467.610.10.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:24:27 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WizWire-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-From: jahnke@fmjassoc.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Upgrading GNOME X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:30:05 -0000 I am upgrading Gnome from 2.4 to 2.10 with a clean install (I have backups) as part of an upgrade from FreeBSD 5.2.1 to the 6.0 Beta (which is working well, btw). I would like to preserve various settings from my old system, including bookmarks, passwords, old email, contacts, and various folders. How do I do so? The upgrade is from Epiphany 1.4 to 2.2; Evolution is from 1.0.6 to 1.6.0. A simple-minded copying of the old files into their original locations showed that both Epiphany and Evolution did not recognize them. If there is a page describing the upgrade I'd be happy to follow it if a link is provided. Please copy me on any replies; I don't read both of these groups regularly. Thank you in advance! Frank Jahnke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 21:31:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C09416A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:31:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@dylangoss.com) Received: from server20.olicentral.com (server20.olicentral.com [216.121.191.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ACC443D4C for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:31:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@dylangoss.com) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server20.olicentral.com (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id j6RLVSG23549; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:31:28 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) In-Reply-To: <049E89CF-67DF-41AB-ACEF-1EDD7C0643C7@shire.net> References: <234FB55B-4315-4AE0-AED4-C2627B0FBD57@dylangoss.com> <5F971020-DFD0-408D-AD87-61E36FA54C52@shire.net> <7FA820FE-3943-4DF9-B515-24E40D34509F@dylangoss.com> <049E89CF-67DF-41AB-ACEF-1EDD7C0643C7@shire.net> Message-Id: <5169F794-2250-4EA6-86DD-47FFE329A694@dylangoss.com> From: "D. Goss" Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:31:29 -0700 To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" , FreeBSD questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: SCSI RAID management under FreeBSD 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:31:37 -0000 On Jul 27, 2005, at 2:24 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: >>>>> What is the Adaptec model for this IBM card? Most of the >>>>> standard Adaptec cards seem to have SW that works. >>> If so, what device does it come up under? What does the dmesg >>> look like? >>> >>> Chad > >> ips0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >> >> -- snip -- > A quick look at man ips seems to show that that is its own thing. > You may wish to email the driver writer at the bottom of the man > page for this to ask about compatibility etc. > > I do know that aac and asr based drivers for Adaptec cards do have > CLI RAID configuration and utility software that runs on FreeBSD > > good luck > Chad Thanks Chad - I'll email the author and I appreciate the tip regarding the aac and asr based drivers. d. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 21:50:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA3816A41F; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:50:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) Received: from av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (bantam.cisco.com [64.102.19.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B56843D48; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:50:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from rooster.cisco.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) with ESMTP id j6RLoXc19869; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:50:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [64.102.192.190] (dhcp-64-102-192-190.cisco.com [64.102.192.190]) by rooster.cisco.com (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) with ESMTP id j6RLoW700352; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:50:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42E801E3.8020706@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:51:31 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke Organization: FreeBSD, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Jahnke References: <1122499467.610.10.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1122499467.610.10.camel@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Upgrading GNOME X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:50:35 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Frank Jahnke wrote: | I am upgrading Gnome from 2.4 to 2.10 with a clean install (I have | backups) as part of an upgrade from FreeBSD 5.2.1 to the 6.0 Beta (which | is working well, btw). I would like to preserve various settings from | my old system, including bookmarks, passwords, old email, contacts, and | various folders. How do I do so? You should restore your home directory, then let the applications handle their settings migration. | | The upgrade is from Epiphany 1.4 to 2.2; Evolution is from 1.0.6 to | 1.6.0. A simple-minded copying of the old files into their original | locations showed that both Epiphany and Evolution did not recognize | them. If there is a page describing the upgrade I'd be happy to follow | it if a link is provided. You should never copy settings files. Instead, let the applications themselves handle migration. Evolution, for example, will migrate its own settings files. Copying files by hand will only break things. Note: an upgrade step this large has not been tested by the FreeBSD GNOME team. Joe | | Please copy me on any replies; I don't read both of these groups | regularly. | | Thank you in advance! | | Frank Jahnke | | _______________________________________________ | freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org mailing list | http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome | To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" | - -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gnome@FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC6AHjb2iPiv4Uz4cRAqPoAJ9G4baaP8Q7pNaAiDk3V1w/08wU7QCgkLxo GsJelazkcF7zcbUXoq87liY= =WSu/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 21:57:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405B616A41F; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:57:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahnke@fmjassoc.com) Received: from smtp.wizwire.com (smtp.wizwire.com [209.218.100.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD75043D5C; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:57:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahnke@fmjassoc.com) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (209.218.101.53.bvi2.wizwire.com [209.218.101.53]) by smtp.wizwire.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6RLvk37011194; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:57:47 -0700 From: Frank Jahnke To: Joe Marcus Clarke In-Reply-To: <42E801E3.8020706@FreeBSD.org> References: <1122499467.610.10.camel@localhost> <42E801E3.8020706@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1122501163.610.16.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:52:43 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WizWire-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-From: jahnke@fmjassoc.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Upgrading GNOME X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:57:59 -0000 On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 14:51, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > | > | The upgrade is from Epiphany 1.4 to 2.2; Evolution is from 1.0.6 to > | 1.6.0. A simple-minded copying of the old files into their original > | locations showed that both Epiphany and Evolution did not recognize > | them. If there is a page describing the upgrade I'd be happy to follow > | it if a link is provided. > > You should never copy settings files. Instead, let the applications > themselves handle migration. Evolution, for example, will migrate its > own settings files. Copying files by hand will only break things. OK -- so what settings files do I delete to get this to work? Evolution's import facility, for example, did not recognize that any email files existed. I suspected that some of the index files need to be deleted, but before I do so I seek advice. > > Note: an upgrade step this large has not been tested by the FreeBSD > GNOME team. I'll let you know how it works if you like. > > Joe Frank From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 22:01:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F5816A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:01:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maarfree@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDAFC43D4C for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:01:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maarfree@xs4all.nl) Received: from maarten.sandersatkins.nl (a80-127-55-226.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.127.55.226]) by smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6RM1Rpl019884 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:01:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from maarfree@xs4all.nl) From: Maarten Sanders To: FreeBSD - Questions Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:01:28 +0200 Message-Id: <1122501688.40188.4.camel@maarten> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: Anjuta question, gettext X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:01:29 -0000 Hi, I am fiddling a bit with Anjuta. For some reason I cannot compile an application unless I add at some point near the top of intl/dcigettext.c: #define HAVE_STRCHR 1 Does anyone know why this is needed? If I take the same project to my office (linux) system everything works just fine. Maarten From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 22:05:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4876316A41F; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:05:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) Received: from av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (bantam.cisco.com [64.102.19.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE6DD43D45; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:05:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from rooster.cisco.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) with ESMTP id j6RM5dV20870; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:05:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [64.102.192.190] (dhcp-64-102-192-190.cisco.com [64.102.192.190]) by rooster.cisco.com (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) with ESMTP id j6RM5c714875; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:05:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42E8056D.9030501@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:06:37 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke Organization: FreeBSD, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Jahnke References: <1122499467.610.10.camel@localhost> <42E801E3.8020706@FreeBSD.org> <1122501163.610.16.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1122501163.610.16.camel@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Upgrading GNOME X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:05:40 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Frank Jahnke wrote: | On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 14:51, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: | | |>| |>| The upgrade is from Epiphany 1.4 to 2.2; Evolution is from 1.0.6 to |>| 1.6.0. A simple-minded copying of the old files into their original |>| locations showed that both Epiphany and Evolution did not recognize |>| them. If there is a page describing the upgrade I'd be happy to follow |>| it if a link is provided. |> |>You should never copy settings files. Instead, let the applications |>themselves handle migration. Evolution, for example, will migrate its |>own settings files. Copying files by hand will only break things. | | | OK -- so what settings files do I delete to get this to work? | Evolution's import facility, for example, did not recognize that any | email files existed. I suspected that some of the index files need to | be deleted, but before I do so I seek advice. No files should need to be deleted. Just restore your entire home directory as it was under GNOME 2.4, and run each application. If Evo is not recognizing the old files, you may be out of luck. Joe - -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gnome@FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC6AVtb2iPiv4Uz4cRAn7UAJ9FQoabpKKNI1zz0w0gz9aHVLlKlwCfbq7v 4Yddjm112P+d0dSOoklmyIQ= =6kdO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 22:14:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF6A016A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:14:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@orbweavers.co.uk) Received: from mail.orbweavers.co.uk (213-152-38-100.dsl.eclipse.net.uk [213.152.38.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BDDA43D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:14:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@orbweavers.co.uk) Received: from 192.168.0.5 (localhost.orbweavers.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) by mail.orbweavers.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72AD8B2434 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:14:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from 192.168.0.10 (SquirrelMail authenticated user martin) by 192.168.0.5 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:14:46 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <1559.192.168.0.10.1122502486.squirrel@192.168.0.5> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:14:46 +0100 (BST) From: martin@orbweavers.co.uk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Shell script frustration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:14:48 -0000 Hi, I am making big progress in writing the ldap tools I mentioned earlier, but I have come across a completly frustrating problem I can't crack. Most likely it is something simple to do with the shell scripting, but I can't figure it out at all - script is binddn=`awk '/rootdn/ {print $2}' /usr/local/etc/openldap/slapd.conf` group_base=`awk '/nss_base_group/ {print $2}' /etc/ldap.conf | cut -f1 -d?` echo ldapdelete -W -D $binddn \"cn=$1, $group_base\" ldapdelete -W -D $binddn \"cn=$1, $group_base\" It grabs the rootdn from the slapd.conf file, then the base ou for the groups from the ldap.conf file, and construct the delete statement from that. when run ('./rmgroup users') it outputs - ldapdelete -W -D "cn=Manager,dc=orbweavers,dc=co,dc=uk" "cn=users, ou=groups,dc=orbweavers,dc=co,dc=uk" Enter LDAP Password: ldap_bind: Invalid DN syntax (34) additional info: invalid DN However, if I copy and paste the echod statement (the first line of the output) straight to the shell, it run fine. I've tried every which way of quoting I can think of, but nothing gives. Please tell me I am missing something really obvious and I can retrieve my sanity! cheers, Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 22:33:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFDBA16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:33:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arcade@ag.dn.ua) Received: from ag.dn.ua (ns.ag.dn.ua [213.130.22.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6A043D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:33:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arcade@ag.dn.ua) Received: from [172.16.0.1] ([172.16.0.1]) by ag.dn.ua (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6RMXLOt082909 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:33:22 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from arcade@ag.dn.ua) Message-ID: <42E80BB1.8090900@ag.dn.ua> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:33:21 +0300 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; uk-UA; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050723 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-U; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: interface perfomance counters X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:33:26 -0000 Is there any way to clear performance counters on interface link in cisco? I'm graphing users traffic with mrtg. Also i put in a small script, which automatically links user's rrd database to interface name, when user logs in. The problem is when user changes interface MRTG produces high pitch on the graph, which is far more higher than users bandwidth. This renders image unusable... Is there any other way to deal with it? -- [WBR], Arcade. [SAT Astronomy/Think to survive!] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 23:15:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 470BA16A420 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:15:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2504A43D68 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:15:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 78CB784D68; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:45:10 +0930 (CST) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:45:10 +0930 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Nathan Sanders Message-ID: <20050727231510.GU842@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20050727141838.58AD943D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9FS2A0mJXOFE71TQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050727141838.58AD943D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Sr. Compiler Engineering Opportunity X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:15:14 -0000 --9FS2A0mJXOFE71TQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday, 27 July 2005 at 7:20:58 -0700, Nathan Sanders wrote: > Hello- > > I'm hoping to network with you and find out if you know anyone who > you think could be interested in the following opportunity? Try sending this kind of message to jobs@FreeBSD.org. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --9FS2A0mJXOFE71TQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC6BV+IubykFB6QiMRAmjCAJ484c8HJN42tAqLlxSoDVxfaVqo0ACfWIWf 46+gbKeL0nP7r7Jf39PTkts= =hUEL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9FS2A0mJXOFE71TQ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 23:30:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D363E16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:30:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mike.Jeays@rogers.com) Received: from smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20F8143D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:30:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mike.Jeays@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 5991 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2005 23:30:11 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=2UZXvmaignV0grnUF9gDFKNC/S+EaeevK38RzPd2DaE7c+fqimbnDcfjVg0YWXE+wl9wWL23aJ8lR54aicpinwUx4WfEuwzFxSbZlYv+8rugqeeJkUws495e5QVN6nPP/jdaYYm1jD+KqsrAlvn90T0XRaMyK/N+nhyFcLl0tzo= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.150?) (mjeays2551@24.114.152.139 with plain) by smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Jul 2005 23:30:11 -0000 From: Mike Jeays To: Norbert Koch In-Reply-To: <000001c592a1$ef621660$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> References: <000001c592a1$ef621660$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1122507010.1281.7.camel@chaucer> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:30:10 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, demigor Subject: RE: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:30:16 -0000 On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 07:54, Norbert Koch wrote: > > How one could defragment a partition on FreeBSD ? Which tools are > > available > > for this ? > > None as I know. Usually there is no reason to defragment a ufs partition. > > Norbert > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" This is one of the things I find really hard to get Windows users to understand. They just won't believe that a company like Microsoft would still be using a filesystem that needs defragmenting if it were possible to design one that didn't. I often wonder why myself - after all, they must have put a fair amount of work into NTFS, which at least doesn't seem to get corrupted in a power failure. Did they make a trade-off I don't understand, or is it just incompetence - or worse, a deal with disk manufacturers to sell more disk? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 00:05:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDA816A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:05:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nopazz@yahoo.com) Received: from web90210.mail.scd.yahoo.com (web90210.mail.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.94.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 40C4143D49 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:05:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nopazz@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 48939 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Jul 2005 00:05:44 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ijYwnzQQHR9Solk31hsGY7kLBHsjuwzmFDtb+1RtF6w3ZWh8wQjp9Sk+Q/KBO6TmAmOxWLoCLcFxnDWHqGE9CTofl+jEuZ0RkisCiILwAGbkkElwQi8Nj7p+ScUNf6pif1AL3VO3U1gBkN+2okFtMCc7fUFkbgMWvErTik3om1I= ; Message-ID: <20050728000544.48937.qmail@web90210.mail.scd.yahoo.com> Received: from [12.221.100.47] by web90210.mail.scd.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:05:44 PDT Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:05:44 -0700 (PDT) From: William Clark To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-866183764-1122509144=:48250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Fwd: web page X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:05:45 -0000 --0-866183764-1122509144=:48250 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mao! Hi Allan.....I thought you might find this interesting after twenty years.........still on the dole, but happy in a bluesy kind of way......how about you? I always thought you would survive the briefcase.....you know? Fondly, BIll C. Note: forwarded message attached.   p.s I'm thinking that this file probably didn't get sent correctly...........in such a case......sorry~~~ --------------------------------- Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page --0-866183764-1122509144=:48250 Content-Type: message/rfc822 X-Apparently-To: nopazz@yahoo.com via 66.218.94.89; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 18:19:29 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [68.142.229.98] Return-Path: Authentication-Results: mta181.mail.scd.yahoo.com from=sbcglobal.net; domainkeys=neutral (no sig) Received: from 68.142.229.98 (HELO smtp107.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com) (68.142.229.98) by mta181.mail.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 18:19:29 -0700 Received: (qmail 21591 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2005 01:19:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (baxelrod@sbcglobal.net@69.214.231.203 with plain) by smtp107.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Jul 2005 01:19:28 -0000 Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 20:19:34 -0500 From: Ben Axelrod User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Windows/20050711) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Clark Subject: web page Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 198 Here is my website: http://benaxelrod.servebeer.com/ the web page is actually being served from my computer, so the site will be down while i move. estimated down time: July 27 - Aug. 10. -Ben --0-866183764-1122509144=:48250-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 00:07:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66EFB16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:07:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it) Received: from vsmtp2.tin.it (vsmtp2alice.tin.it [212.216.176.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF1C543D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:07:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it) Received: from workstation (80.181.63.234) by vsmtp2.tin.it (7.2.060.1) id 42E65EE6000B4345 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 02:07:40 +0200 Message-ID: <000901c59308$5710fe00$98edfea9@workstation> From: ".VWV." To: References: <007b01c59251$925c5ca0$98edfea9@workstation> <42E6FCC5.8070309@mac.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050726211444.18e82a00@cobalt.antimatter.net> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:07:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: Re: certance DAT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:07:43 -0000 [Technicians' or hackers' suggestions seem like music to me. Thanks. I am compelled on this shit system, owing to the need of managing some commercial stuff. I hate it. Please forgive me for using it]. I have compared some features among different current tape drive standards. It seems DLT and LTO Ultrium 2 cartridges are more expensive then DAT 72 and VXA 2 ones. I have not found yet a criterion useful to choose the most reliable standard. Any suggestion could be useful. I'll need either to dump or to tar. Please CC me. Thanks once more. .VWV. ---- Original Message ---- From: "Glenn Dawson" To: "Chuck Swiger" ; ".VWV." Cc: Sent: Wednesday, 27 July, 2005 05:19 Subject: Re: certance DAT > At 08:17 PM 7/26/2005, Chuck Swiger wrote: > ...so it's not exactly super-zippy, either. Hmm, is it just me, or > are the following numbers significantly low for a RAID-1 of two 10K > RPM U320 SCSI disks...? > >> /dev/amrd1 >> 512 # sectorsize >> 73274490880 # mediasize in bytes (68G) >> 143114240 # mediasize in sectors >> 8908 # Cylinders according to firmware. >> 255 # Heads according to firmware. >> 63 # Sectors according to firmware. >> >> Seek times: >> Full stroke: 250 iter in 1.824059 sec = 7.296 msec >> Half stroke: 250 iter in 1.805398 sec = 7.222 msec >> Quarter stroke: 500 iter in 4.254147 sec = 8.508 msec >> Short forward: 400 iter in 2.821081 sec = 7.053 msec >> Short backward: 400 iter in 2.860203 sec = 7.151 msec >> Seq outer: 2048 iter in 8.821875 sec = 4.308 msec >> Seq inner: 2048 iter in 9.006505 sec = 4.398 msec >> Transfer rates: >> outside: 102400 kbytes in 9.242111 sec = 11080 >> kbytes/sec middle: 102400 kbytes in 9.230325 sec = >> 11094 kbytes/sec inside: 102400 kbytes in 10.779231 >> sec = 9500 kbytes/sec >> >> [ This is running RELENG_5_4... ] > > I would have expected the transfer rates to be about twice what > they're listed as here. Though I don't know how you measured them. > > If you want to see something interesting, create a ufs1 file system > on the same raid 1 using FreeBSD 4.x. Then mount it in 5.x and do > your test for transfer rates. Compare that to either ufs1 or ufs2 on > the same raid 1 as created by 5.4. > > The results are very interesting. > > -Glenn > > >> -- >> -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 00:29:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B408C16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:29:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from slas7713@yahoo.com) Received: from web33605.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33605.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.199.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5153743D55 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:29:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from slas7713@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 35220 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Jul 2005 00:29:44 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=CabBAkK0xIFyRg4MYFZQ39mVRUMZdHVB3MpthNkTO6/fVwegSjBPPv2dcbu9DVS1VPstsbgyLRWKdN+Fhjnw1VtSyE+Z9RuWIQLeEaRbFoyT/NF5htQaMBPfPIgLulgF27gtTdUDmG48ddxh9++pNyg4Ux7LPz+A4dGP3LQ0TCU= ; Message-ID: <20050728002944.35218.qmail@web33605.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.216.129.249] by web33605.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:29:44 PDT Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:29:44 -0700 (PDT) From: steve lasiter To: free bsd MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Segmentation fault (11) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:29:46 -0000 This is a questions to the group since I'm not sure if it's related to my FreeBSD 5.4 OS or something else. I'm on a Dell Pentium 2.55Ghz with 1 GB Ram. Background: In trying to install oscommerce I have uninstalled my php5 and went to php4. Because of error I've reinstalled Apache 1.3 and Perl5. My database is MySQL 5.02. The problem: when I attempt to open an index.php file in the oscommerce program I get, in my httpd-error.log [notice] child pid xxx exit signal Segmentation fault(11) All other php related sites are functioning well with no problems. Do you believe this is being caused by the code in the oscommerce program or something FreeBSD is doing? Thanks for input Dean Lasiter ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 00:34:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B79916A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:34:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from smtp4.server.rpi.edu (smtp4.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E9F643D48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:34:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp4.server.rpi.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j6S0YDft027805; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:34:14 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <1559.192.168.0.10.1122502486.squirrel@192.168.0.5> References: <1559.192.168.0.10.1122502486.squirrel@192.168.0.5> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:34:13 -0400 To: martin@orbweavers.co.uk, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-RPI-SA-Score: undef - spam-scanning disabled X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) on 128.113.2.4 Cc: Subject: Re: Shell script frustration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:34:16 -0000 At 11:14 PM +0100 7/27/05, martin@orbweavers.co.uk wrote: > >echo ldapdelete -W -D $binddn \"cn=$1, $group_base\" >ldapdelete -W -D $binddn \"cn=$1, $group_base\" >when run ('./rmgroup users') it outputs - > >ldapdelete -W -D "cn=Manager,dc=orbweavers,dc=co,dc=uk" "cn=users, >ou=groups,dc=orbweavers,dc=co,dc=uk" >Enter LDAP Password: >ldap_bind: Invalid DN syntax (34) > additional info: invalid DN > >However, if I copy and paste the echod statement (the first line >of the output) straight to the shell, it run fine. What I do in this cases is create a script called "list_args.sh": #!/bin/sh printf "\nlist_args.sh at `date +%H:%M:%S` with \$# = $#\n" # Process all parameters. N=0 while test $# != 0 ; do N=$(($N+1)) printf " \$$N = [%3d] '$1'\n" ${#1} shift done Then in your script, replace the ldapdelete command with list_args.sh. That way you'll see *exactly* what ldapdelete is seeing for parameters, and that might help. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 00:35:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B826116A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:35:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6106943D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:35:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j6S0ZNHA051917; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:35:23 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:35:23 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: ".VWV." Message-ID: <20050728003523.GA81656@dan.emsphone.com> References: <007b01c59251$925c5ca0$98edfea9@workstation> <42E6FCC5.8070309@mac.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050726211444.18e82a00@cobalt.antimatter.net> <000901c59308$5710fe00$98edfea9@workstation> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000901c59308$5710fe00$98edfea9@workstation> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: certance DAT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:35:24 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 28), .VWV. said: > I have compared some features among different current tape drive > standards. It seems DLT and LTO Ultrium 2 cartridges are more > expensive then DAT 72 and VXA 2 ones. I have not found yet a > criterion useful to choose the most reliable standard. Any suggestion > could be useful. I'll need either to dump or to tar. They are definitely more expensive (as are the drives), but they are also higher capacity and can write a lot faster than DAT. If you have less than 36gb of data to back up at any one time and you don't mind a backup taking 3 hours (if done at night, for example), then DAT may be perfect for you. Once your backups start exceeding your backup window or take more than one tape, you can look at more expensive drives (or an autoloader). An LTO-2 drive can fill a 200gb tape in the same 3 hour period. If you have compressible data, double the tape capacities (to 72gb and 400gb). If you need more than 400gb native on a tape, get an LTO-3 :) Reliability reports are too dependant on local variables (how often is a tape reused, how are they stored, how clean is your server room etc) so I would only trust comparitive reports from people with multiple drive types at one location. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 00:48:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABECF16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:48:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from slas7713@yahoo.com) Received: from web33613.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33613.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.199.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F31143D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:48:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from slas7713@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 91214 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Jul 2005 00:48:44 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=cgMZ5PXKc8uSoDtg2Bwa1OPAREKt7VLfmxjyCqKFXz1V0Dh+imagjrHNouoHPtEYUjViQwhyxgv3zTJy4ic4LoB7rxeoWMRsfpry9bLn8cLwU87bnOO8SdgImAF9wdD8290oMEKqddrx6aAcVm9kxjptYKI98gDyS13puRo264M= ; Message-ID: <20050728004844.91212.qmail@web33613.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.216.129.249] by web33613.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:48:44 PDT Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:48:44 -0700 (PDT) From: steve lasiter To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Segmentation fault (11) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:48:45 -0000 This is a questions to the group since I'm not sure if it's related to my FreeBSD 5.4 OS or something else. I'm on a Dell Pentium 2.55Ghz with 1 GB Ram. Background: In trying to install oscommerce I have uninstalled my php5 and went to php4. Because of error I've reinstalled Apache 1.3 and Perl5. My database is MySQL 5.02. The problem: when I attempt to open an index.php file in the oscommerce program I get, in my httpd-error.log [notice] child pid xxx exit signal Segmentation fault(11) All other php related sites are functioning well with no problems. Do you believe this is being caused by the code in the oscommerce program or something FreeBSD is doing? Thanks for input Dean Lasiter __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail for Mobile Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 01:11:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB3F16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:11:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snailboy1@yahoo.com) Received: from web53911.mail.yahoo.com (web53911.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.160]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2463243D58 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:11:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snailboy1@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 68378 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Jul 2005 01:11:12 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=L7GoU+tDTV8Cf0pm1d77XElCTFXDd1+X9WWrLrjgaWjGZ70AF5Zpfsfsg0tqp5D7coETUu/pUmwIQaV5tL64a0QsQ/tPsjA6qE1JSDxpSfDTRWzd3I8vkZqzLBJiSv9HZFj5lWruKiotkZAqy+Yyv01zVcWx8iVaQBioNvW1mgw= ; Message-ID: <20050728011112.68374.qmail@web53911.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [72.16.58.178] by web53911.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:11:12 PDT Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:11:12 -0700 (PDT) From: David LeCount To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Upgraded to 6.0 beta, now "makefiles possibly broken" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:11:14 -0000 A few days ago, I cvsupped to RELENG_6 and compiled and installed everything just fine. After I finished with that, I cvsupped my ports and tried to do a portupgrade, but for every single port, it says, "Makefile possibly broken." I cvsupped src again the next day thinking there may have been a bug that got worked out, but still the same problem. I have been unable to find anything about this issue in /usr/src/UPDATING, /usr/ports/UPDATING, on the mailing lists, and in bug reports. This baffles me since this should affect everyone, so I figure maybe I did something incorrectly. Does anyone have any ideas? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 01:17:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F7C016A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:17:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marius@korsmo.org) Received: from elwolfie.com (elwolfie.com [195.204.13.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C953D43D49 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:17:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marius@korsmo.org) Received: from localhost (elwolfie.com [127.0.0.1]) by elwolfie.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF485A for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:17:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elwolfie.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (elwolfie.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27651-06 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:17:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by elwolfie.com (Postfix, from userid 33) id 018D25C; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:17:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mp-117-185.daxnet.no (mp-117-185.daxnet.no [193.216.117.185]) by elwolfie.com (Horde MIME library) with HTTP for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:17:06 +0200 Message-ID: <20050728031706.fsbcd03hh4lcsg8g@elwolfie.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:17:06 +0200 From: Marius Korsmo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.3) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elwolfie.com Subject: make buildworld fails in openssl/colldef [SOLVED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:17:12 -0000 It took two weeks to fix this problem, and therefore I do have a few questions. The error turned out to be in err.h. The file located in /usr/include was totally different from the one located in /usr/src/include. < /*- < * Copyright (c) 1993 < *The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. --- > /* crypto/err/err.h */ > /* Copyright (C) 1995-1998 Eric Young (eay@cryptsoft.com) > * All rights reserved. You can see the entire diff at http://pastebin.com/322918 My question is: I deleted /usr/src, and I cvsup'ed everything. When I do a make buildworld, why does not the new err.h get copied from /usr/src/include to /usr/include? This would have solved my problem two weeks ago :) Does err.h get copied only when you do a make installworld? Another question, why on earth did I have an old version of err.h? I was running 5.4 RELEASE, and it was installed from an ISO downloaded at FreeBSD.org I installed FreeBSD on another server, using the same CD I believe, and it worked fine (no old err.h). Does anyone have any idea where I might have gotten that old err.h file from? I don't think the file came from any ports I installed, since I install all ports to default location /usr/local. Any idea where that old err.h came from? ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 01:24:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFAC216A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:24:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from jupiter.efacilitas.de (85-10-196-108.clients.your-server.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2092043D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:24:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-37-29.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.37.29]) by jupiter.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A4AC3DE7A; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:29:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89FDC12B135; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:23:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10720-05; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:23:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DDB412B09A; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:23:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E83390.3050501@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:23:28 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050517 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David LeCount References: <20050728011112.68374.qmail@web53911.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050728011112.68374.qmail@web53911.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgraded to 6.0 beta, now "makefiles possibly broken" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:24:01 -0000 David LeCount wrote: > [...] tried to do a > portupgrade, but for every single port, it says, > "Makefile possibly broken." [...] Show the output of # portversion -v portupgrade and # cd /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade # make -V PKGNAME -V IGNORE -V NO_IGNORE completely, even blank lines too. Regards Björn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 01:26:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A930A16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:26:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it) Received: from vsmtp2.tin.it (vsmtp2alice.tin.it [212.216.176.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4164943D48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:26:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it) Received: from workstation (82.48.219.242) by vsmtp2.tin.it (7.2.060.1) id 42E65EE6000B99FE for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:26:44 +0200 Message-ID: <006e01c59313$6a8acc30$98edfea9@workstation> From: ".VWV." To: References: <007b01c59251$925c5ca0$98edfea9@workstation> <42E6FCC5.8070309@mac.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050726211444.18e82a00@cobalt.antimatter.net> <000901c59308$5710fe00$98edfea9@workstation> <20050728003523.GA81656@dan.emsphone.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 02:26:40 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: Re: certance DAT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:26:47 -0000 I am looking for a high-speed tape drive, mainly for use of incremental dump of the FreeBSD filesystem [with complicated custom X environment, but nothing more], and of incremental tar of the Windows, divided into something similar of a unix partitions' layout [with complicated custom graphical engines, but nothing more]. The most heavy backup of each system, is therefore no bigger then 5 GB. Hard disk backups are not possible, because I cannot write to the NTFS backup disk of the Disgusting Operating System. ---- Original Message ---- From: "Dan Nelson" To: ".VWV." Cc: Sent: Thursday, 28 July, 2005 01:35 Subject: Re: certance DAT > In the last episode (Jul 28), .VWV. said: >> I have compared some features among different current tape drive >> standards. It seems DLT and LTO Ultrium 2 cartridges are more >> expensive then DAT 72 and VXA 2 ones. I have not found yet a >> criterion useful to choose the most reliable standard. Any suggestion >> could be useful. I'll need either to dump or to tar. > > They are definitely more expensive (as are the drives), but they are > also higher capacity and can write a lot faster than DAT. If you have > less than 36gb of data to back up at any one time and you don't mind a > backup taking 3 hours (if done at night, for example), then DAT may be > perfect for you. Once your backups start exceeding your backup window > or take more than one tape, you can look at more expensive drives (or > an autoloader). An LTO-2 drive can fill a 200gb tape in the same 3 > hour period. If you have compressible data, double the tape > capacities (to 72gb and 400gb). If you need more than 400gb native > on a tape, get an LTO-3 :) > > Reliability reports are too dependant on local variables (how often is > a tape reused, how are they stored, how clean is your server room etc) > so I would only trust comparitive reports from people with multiple > drive types at one location. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 01:27:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4DDF16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:27:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF4543D5E for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:27:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6S1RMQr012565 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:27:23 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050727182114.1c464c50@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:24:00 -0700 To: steve lasiter , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <20050728004844.91212.qmail@web33613.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20050728004844.91212.qmail@web33613.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: Segmentation fault (11) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:27:24 -0000 At 05:48 PM 7/27/2005, steve lasiter wrote: >This is a questions to the group since I'm not sure if >it's related to my FreeBSD 5.4 OS or something else. >I'm on a Dell Pentium 2.55Ghz with 1 GB Ram. > >Background: In trying to install oscommerce I have >uninstalled my php5 and went to php4. Because of error >I've reinstalled Apache 1.3 and Perl5. My database is >MySQL 5.02. I believe that 5.x versions of MySQL are still considered to be beta quality at best. It might be a good idea to use 4.1 which is their recommended version. -Glenn >The problem: when I attempt to open an index.php file >in the oscommerce program I get, in my httpd-error.log >[notice] child pid xxx exit signal Segmentation >fault(11) > >All other php related sites are functioning well with >no problems. Do you believe this is being caused by >the code in the oscommerce program or something >FreeBSD is doing? > >Thanks for input > >Dean Lasiter > > > >__________________________________ >Yahoo! Mail for Mobile >Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. >http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 01:45:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151B416A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:45:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nawcom@nawcom.no-ip.com) Received: from nawcom.no-ip.com (adsl-69-209-132-220.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net [69.209.132.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7528843D5E for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:45:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nawcom@nawcom.no-ip.com) Received: from [192.168.212.9] (unknown [192.168.212.9]) by nawcom.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04E2693F; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:09:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42E838A7.9020301@nawcom.no-ip.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:45:11 -0400 From: nawcom User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: steve lasiter References: <20050728002944.35218.qmail@web33605.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050728002944.35218.qmail@web33605.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Segmentation fault (11) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:45:16 -0000 do you have a copy of the core dump? also sometimes when you use php to interpret the page via the shell it leaves a little extra useful info. since it's a fault and not a kernel panic i wouldnt be worried that its freebsd itself fucking things up. this error only comes up when a program accesses a memory location that it wasn't assigned to. "Because of error I've reinstalled Apache 1.3 and Perl5." what was the error and how was php5 compiled? did you uninstall php4 or did you do a FORCE_PKG_REGISTER? when you say that other php sites work fine do you mean that other php scripts work fine on your apache server? I apologize but your info is pretty general. all i can suggest is do a full deinstall clean on apache+php5 and php4 if the memory glitch has to do with its compilation. perhaps if you email the debug log specifics (strace php "webpage.php") we could understand where the program is at when it crashes. -Ben steve lasiter wrote: >This is a questions to the group since I'm not sure if >it's related to my FreeBSD 5.4 OS or something else. >I'm on a Dell Pentium 2.55Ghz with 1 GB Ram. > >Background: In trying to install oscommerce I have >uninstalled my php5 and went to php4. Because of error >I've reinstalled Apache 1.3 and Perl5. My database is >MySQL 5.02. > >The problem: when I attempt to open an index.php file >in the oscommerce program I get, in my httpd-error.log >[notice] child pid xxx exit signal Segmentation >fault(11) > >All other php related sites are functioning well with >no problems. Do you believe this is being caused by >the code in the oscommerce program or something >FreeBSD is doing? > >Thanks for input > >Dean Lasiter > > > >____________________________________________________ >Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page >http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 01:49:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0441816A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:49:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nawcom@nawcom.no-ip.com) Received: from nawcom.no-ip.com (adsl-69-209-132-220.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net [69.209.132.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F59943D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:49:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nawcom@nawcom.no-ip.com) Received: from [192.168.212.9] (unknown [192.168.212.9]) by nawcom.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBA76952 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:14:11 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42E839C3.4000101@nawcom.no-ip.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:49:55 -0400 From: nawcom User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050728004844.91212.qmail@web33613.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050728004844.91212.qmail@web33613.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Segmentation fault (11) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:49:58 -0000 i seem to use mysql 5.02 just fine even with a few unsuggested code tweaking on my leet 366Mhz cyrix based e-machine :-P thats why i was looking toward a different direction. hopefully you'll solve the situation. -Ben steve lasiter wrote: >This is a questions to the group since I'm not sure if >it's related to my FreeBSD 5.4 OS or something else. >I'm on a Dell Pentium 2.55Ghz with 1 GB Ram. > >Background: In trying to install oscommerce I have >uninstalled my php5 and went to php4. Because of error >I've reinstalled Apache 1.3 and Perl5. My database is >MySQL 5.02. > >The problem: when I attempt to open an index.php file >in the oscommerce program I get, in my httpd-error.log >[notice] child pid xxx exit signal Segmentation >fault(11) > >All other php related sites are functioning well with >no problems. Do you believe this is being caused by >the code in the oscommerce program or something >FreeBSD is doing? > >Thanks for input > >Dean Lasiter > > > >__________________________________ >Yahoo! Mail for Mobile >Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. >http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 02:13:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBEC16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 02:13:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snailboy1@yahoo.com) Received: from web53906.mail.yahoo.com (web53906.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.216]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D1A543D49 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 02:13:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snailboy1@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 76699 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Jul 2005 02:13:13 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=i7xfUdxZ+hX/ZAqzjP9DmN6lrjxJl9E0BxgU7jdrzdPSCQ89ankAOkY7ZjVVunU1DvQtms4ZGJDj5gDE7lu7f4DTgP65K0xqUd94LHHseM4VEzkDa8h90QugSqdNs72Jibg23s6NIod6VDaeCSfBqV23R39G8fyAfx2+YPdkUBE= ; Message-ID: <20050728021313.76697.qmail@web53906.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [72.16.58.178] by web53906.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:13:13 PDT Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:13:13 -0700 (PDT) From: David LeCount To: "Björn" "König" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <42E83A49.1070402@cs.tu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Upgraded to 6.0 beta, now "makefiles possibly broken" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 02:13:15 -0000 --- Björn König wrote: > It seems like that there is a problem with > /usr/share/mk/bsd.compat.mk. > The correct output would be > > > portupgrade-20041226_5 > > > > > > only. Can you show me your bsd.compat.mk? > > Björn > # $FreeBSD: src/share/mk/bsd.compat.mk,v 1.20 2005/03/02 11:53:21 trhodes Exp $ .if !defined(BURN_BRIDGES) .for oldnew in \ NOATM:NO_ATM \ NOCLEANDIR:NO_CLEANDIR \ NOCRYPT:NO_CRYPT \ NODOCCOMPRESS:NO_DOCCOMPRESS \ NOEXTRADEPEND:NO_EXTRADEPEND \ NOFORTH:NO_FORTH \ NOFSCHG:NO_FSCHG \ NOGAMES:NO_GAMES \ NOHTML:NO_HTML \ NOINET6:NO_INET6 \ NOINFO:NO_INFO \ NOINFOCOMPRESS:NO_INFOCOMPRESS \ NOINSTALLLIB:NO_INSTALLLIB \ NOLIBC_R:NO_LIBC_R \ NOLIBPTHREAD:NO_LIBPTHREAD \ NOLIBTHR:NO_LIBTHR \ NOLINT:NO_LINT \ NOMAN:NO_MAN \ NOMANCOMPRESS:NO_MANCOMPRESS \ NOMLINKS:NO_MLINKS \ NOOBJ:NO_OBJ \ NOPAM:NO_PAM \ NOPIC:NO_PIC \ NOPROFILE:NO_PROFILE \ NO_RCMNDS:NO_RCMDS \ NOSHARE:NO_SHARE \ NOSHARED:NO_SHARED \ NOTAGS:NO_TAGS .for old in ${oldnew:C/:.*//} .for new in ${oldnew:C/.*://} .if defined(${old}) && !defined(${new}) .warning ${old} is deprecated in favor of ${new} ${new}= ${${old}} .endif .endfor .endfor .endfor .endif __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 02:16:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B6C16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 02:16:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snailboy1@yahoo.com) Received: from web53905.mail.yahoo.com (web53905.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B268E43D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 02:16:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snailboy1@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 17557 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Jul 2005 02:16:49 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=EavzWAc8PjkTbLODAF0bFO4ZTYdu2e8CnCIsVMru8bbsn8skDug++CNOwzMR9gtugW5DpB0aEcRWNRAP0EMcXdF59EkbuOEZRyEpJjuRqXNhAx4C2SD5KGjh/6llPBiY+aStN0QkgGFEsXdLonpj2zh7jnlF68PuIm9vHk4wpX4= ; Message-ID: <20050728021649.17555.qmail@web53905.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [72.16.58.178] by web53905.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:16:48 PDT Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:16:48 -0700 (PDT) From: David LeCount To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <42E83B42.2090407@cs.tu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Upgraded to 6.0 beta, now "makefiles possibly broken" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 02:16:50 -0000 --- Björn König wrote: > You don't need to show me your bsd.compat.mk, but > look at > /etc/make.conf. Do you have defined NOPROFILE there? > > Björn I didn't read this message before sending my last one. Yes, I had NOPROFILE in make.conf. I just changed it to NO_PROFILE and it works now. I had forgotten about this. Portupgrade is fetching sources now. Thanks. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 03:06:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8ED516A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:06:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from S4.cableone.net (s4.cableone.net [24.116.0.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0A443D4C for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:06:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.vulpes (unverified [24.119.122.41]) by S4.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S4) with ESMTP id 26551561 for multiple; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:08:49 -0700 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:10:10 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: Marcin Message-ID: <20050727221010.72fe115e@vixen42.vulpes> In-Reply-To: <20050727183822.GA30480@daedalus.desk.pl> References: <20050727172134.409FA16A452@hub.freebsd.org> <20050727183822.GA30480@daedalus.desk.pl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.12 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 0, First 69, in=124, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 24.119.122.41 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD file system example and question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:06:52 -0000 Don't know the answers, but the fs mailing list would probally be a better one to ask on. On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:38:22 +0200 Marcin wrote: > > Hello, where can i find information or examples of how to write a > file system for FreeBSD, apart from /usr/src/sys/* > and /usr/share/man/*? > > What is vnode_if.h for? Why is it generated for every fs module if > it is the same every time? I tried to google for the answer but > found nothing. Only a note on Darwin's dev site. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 03:24:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2A516A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:24:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jumbler.chi@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B5C43D53 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:24:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jumbler.chi@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 63so334135wri for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:24:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=JAoobgIitBi0YkqxRx6AKSNFdcMuPzfh8EMc6fiIUEpfLyFNQshkT97chy9D+7COrRgLQ7gm9VKIcIDJFdqX28+iMeMqsmDIY2IlimW/Ksv+SbMfSeT9s31L59ECyvV0wmNAZsTP35OKnIGCYcoFZE3F8PgyXcJEVuiFkJwBwsA= Received: by 10.54.19.10 with SMTP id 10mr572498wrs; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:24:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.19.18 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:24:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:24:47 +0800 From: jumbler chi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: delete partition from MO X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jumbler chi List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:24:48 -0000 Hi All: Recently , I got one HP Optical 2600Fx MO driver and 2.6G MO.=20 I used /stand/sysinstall to create new partition and file system. I saw one original partition of NTFS.=20 I deleted entire partition , and create new.=20 when I pressed 'W' to wrtte new partition information , I got a segment fau= lt.=20 Therefore , I executed 'newfs' directly , and it worked.=20 then , the MO capacity is 2.6G. But the real mounted capacity is 1.2G.=20 $ df -h /dev/da1a Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/da1a 1.2G 4.0K 1.1G 0% /u01 What's wrong about to delete original partition and the capacity ?=20 ps. My box is FreeBSD 5.2.1 R=20 my dmesg information as following .. acd0: CDROM at ata0-slave PIO4 Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle GEOM: create disk da0 dp=3D0xc6343050 GEOM: create disk da1 dp=3D0xc6344850 da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 da1: Removable Optical SCSI-2 device da1: 5.000MB/s transfers (5.000MHz, offset 15), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 1243MB (1273011 1024 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 79C) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 03:26:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 274DD16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:26:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpk@dpk.net) Received: from shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net [207.246.149.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D2443D48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:26:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpk@dpk.net) Received: from shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6S3Q8rR039794 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:26:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dpk@localhost) by shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id j6S3Q8gl039791 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:26:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net: dpk owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:26:07 -0700 (PDT) From: dpk X-X-Sender: dpk@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050727185853.D23753@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Subject: FreeBSD 5.4+SMP, severe network degredation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:26:09 -0000 We just received several SuperMicro servers, 3.0Ghz Xeon x 2, 4GB RAM. They're using the em driver and the ports are set to 1000Mbit (we also tried 100Mbit/full duplex on the card and on the switch). They're running FreeBSD 5.4. I ran a steady ping on a couple of them while they were running "GENERIC", and then rebooted them with a kernel built with the "PAE" kernel included with the installation, with "option SMP" added. The PAE-SMP-GENERIC kernel was built after cvsup'ing with "tag=RELENG_5_4" and the uname reports "5.4-RELEASE-p5". Here are the ping results: GENERIC: 117 packets transmitted, 117 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.451/0.554/0.856/0.059 ms PAE-SMP-GENERIC: 102 packets transmitted, 102 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.569/4.262/7.944/2.065 ms Fetching a 637MB ISO from a local server, also on 100/FDX: GENERIC: /dev/null 100% of 637 MB 10 MBps 00m00s real 0m58.071s user 0m1.954s sys 0m6.278s PAE-SMP-GENERIC: /dev/null 100% of 637 MB 5764 kBps 00m00s real 1m53.324s user 0m1.478s sys 0m5.624s Running GENERIC, systat shows about 7000 interrupts/second, and around 600 interrupts/second using PAE-SMP-GENERIC, while fetch was running. I've checked the errata and hardware notes, as well as gnats, and was not able to find anything that explains or matches this behavior. We've run SMP servers for years, using 4.5-4.11, but we've never seen the network performance cut in half (or pings go up 10x). Removing "option SMP" makes the problem go away, but at a very significant performance cost obviously. Could it be something from -p5? Is this explained/examined in a PR I've missed, and if so can I add some information? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 03:32:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C6216A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:32:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3DD43D49 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:32:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.13.4+UW05.04/8.13.4+UW05.05) with ESMTP id j6S3W9kv027077 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:32:09 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [140.142.167.59] (cs331-58.spmodem.washington.edu [140.142.167.59]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.4+UW05.04/8.13.4+UW05.07) with ESMTP id j6S3W1bo014090 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:32:08 -0700 Message-ID: <42E851B5.7030203@u.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:32:05 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <42E820E9.2030401@elischer.org> <20050727193446.4623108d@vixen42.vulpes> In-Reply-To: <20050727193446.4623108d@vixen42.vulpes> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: sound card that works? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:32:10 -0000 Vulpes Velox wrote: >On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:03:53 -0700 >Julian Elischer wrote: > > > >>I need to buy 30 soundcards that can be accessed from FreeBSD >>does someone know of a currently available basic sound card >>(an original soundblaster would do if I could still get them) that >>has good support from freeBSD. I guess full duplex would be >>a requirement but anything that can do that.. >> >> > >check out the emu10k1 driver > >you may want to look into OSS as well > > Anything that's compatible with the csa freebsd driver is good to get (cs42xx/cs46xx compatible in ALSA/OSS). Some cards are of course the older soundblasters, as well as the turtle beach cards (made by Voyetra). As suggested before, there're also the SB Live! (emu10k1) cards which are fairly universally supported as well. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 05:01:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD27C16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 05:01:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailer-daemon@cryptonomicon.mit.edu) Received: from cryptonomicon.mit.edu (CRYPTONOMICON.MIT.EDU [18.7.14.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8648943D55 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 05:01:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailer-daemon@cryptonomicon.mit.edu) Received: (from root@localhost) by cryptonomicon.mit.edu (8.12.9) id j6S5107F013302; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:01:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:01:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200507280501.j6S5107F013302@cryptonomicon.mit.edu> To: questions@freebsd.org From: PGP Key Server Administrator In-Reply-To: <200507280500.j6S50r85013272@cryptonomicon.mit.edu> Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="---PKSD-----" Cc: Subject: Your command, Re: Error, was invalid X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 05:01:02 -0000 -----PKSD----- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii OpenPGP Public Key Server For questions or comments regarding this key server site, contact PGP Key Server Administrator Current version: 0.9.6 NOTE! This service is provided to facilitate public-key cryptography for demonstration and educational purposes. It is the responsibility of users of public-key cryptography to ensure that their activities conform to legal requirements. -----PKSD----- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline [ Czech: Pro ziskani ceske verze tohoto textu poslete prosim e-mail se "Subject" radkou "HELP CZ" na adresu pgp-public-keys@keys.cz.pgp.net, nebo pristupte na URL http://www.pgp.net/pgpnet/email-help-cz.html Danish: For at faa en dansk version af denne text skal du sende en e-mail med en subject-tekst: "HELP DK" til pgp-public-keys@keys.dk.pgp.net eller slaa op paa URL http://www.pgp.net/pgpnet/email-help-dk.html German: Für eine deutschsprachige Fassung dieses Textes senden Sie eine Mail mit dem Subject "HELP DE" an die folgende Adresse pgp-public-keys@keys.de.pgp.net oder URL: http://www.pgp.net/pgp/email-help-de.html English: For an English version of this message, send an e-mail with a subject line of "HELP" to pgp-public-keys@keys.pgp.net, or access the URL http://www.pgp.net/pgpnet/email-help-en.html Spanish: Para obtener una versión en castellano de este texto, envíe un mail a pgp-public-keys@keys.nl.pgp.net con el "Subject" HELP ES Finnish: Saadaksesi taman tekstin suomeksi, laheta osoitteeseen pgp-public-keys@keys.nl.pgp.net tyhja viesti, jonka Subject-kentta on "HELP FI". French: Pour une version française de çe texte, envoyez un message au sujet de "HELP FR" à pgp-public-keys@keys.ch.pgp.net Croatian: Za hrvatsku verziju ovoga teksta posaljite poruku koja ce u Subject imati "HELP HR" na adresu pgp-public-keys@keys.nl.pgp.net Japanese: Nihongo no setumei ga hosii baai wa Subject: ni "HELP JA" to kaite, pgp-public-keys@keys.pgp.net ni e-mail. Korean: ¾Æ·¡ÀÇ ³»¿ëÀ» Çѱ۷Πº¸½Ã·Á¸é Á¦¸ñ(Subject)ÀÌ "HELP KR" ÀÎ ÀüÀÚ¿ìÆíÀ» pgp-public-keys@keys.kr.pgp.net À¸·Î º¸³»ÁֽʽÿÀ. Polish: Zeby uzyskac polska wersje tej strony, wyslij list z linia "HELP PL" w polu Subject na adres pgp-public-keys@keys.pl.pgp.net lub zajrzyj pod URL http://www.pgp.net/pgpnet/email-help-pl.html Portuguese:Para obter uma versão em português deste texto, deve enviar um mail para pgp-public-keys@keys.pt.pgp.net com o "Subject" HELP PT Norwegian: For aa faa dette dokumentet paa norsk, send "HELP NO" til pgp-public-keys@keys.nl.pgp.net Swedish: For a Swedish version of this message, send an e-mail with a subject line of "HELP SE" to pgp-public-keys@keys.se.pgp.net, or access the URL http://www.pgp.net/pgpnet/email-help-se.html Chinese: ¹ï¨ú±o¦¹¤@¤¤¤åª© PGP ¦øªA¾¹´£¨Ñ½u¤W»²§U»¡©ú, ½Ð E-mail µ¹ pgp-public-keys@keys.tw.pgp.net, ©ó Subject: µù©ú "HELP TW" §Y¥i. ] OpenPGP Public Email Keyservers ------------------------------- There are OpenPGP public email key servers which allow one to exchange public keys running using the Internet and UUCP mail systems. Those capable of accessing the WWW might prefer to use the WWW interface available via http://www.pgp.net/pgpnet/www-key.html and managers of sites which may want to make frequent lookups may care to copy the full keyring from the FTP server at ftp://ftp.pgp.net/pub/pgp/keys/ This service exists only to help transfer keys between PGP users. It does NOT attempt to guarantee that a key is a valid key; use the signatures on a key for that kind of security. Each keyserver processes requests in the form of mail messages. The commands for the server are entered on the Subject: line. ---------------------------------------------- ======== ----- Note that they should NOT be included in the body of the message. --------------------- === --------------------------------------- To: pgp-public-keys@keys.pgp.net From: johndoe@some.site.edu Subject: help Sending your key to ONE server is enough. After it processes your key, it will forward your add request to other servers automagically. For example, to add your key to the keyserver, or to update your key if it is already there, send a message similar to the following to any server: To: pgp-public-keys@keys.pgp.net From: johndoe@some.site.edu Subject: add -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6 -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- COMPROMISED KEYS: Create a Key Revocation Certificate (read the PGP docs on how to do that) and mail your key to the server once again, with the ADD command. Valid commands are: Command Result ---------------------- ------------------------------------------------- HELP Returns this message HELP language Localized help text (DE, EN, ES, FI, FR, HR, NO) ADD Add PGP public key from the body of your message INDEX userid List all PGP keys containing the words in userid VERBOSE INDEX userid Verbose list of all keys containing userid GET userid Get the key(s) matching userid LAST days Get the keys updated in the last `days' days ------------------------------------------------------------------------ LIMITATIONS: Most keyservers have a limit on the number of keys they return in queries, in order not to swamp you with too many keys in case you made a typo (the full database at the keyservers exceeds 2GB). If you *REALLY* need the whole index file or key ring, *PLEASE* ftp it from a key server such as "ftp://ftp.pgp.net/pub/pgp/keys/" or one of the national servers. NOTE: PGP is extremely slow when operating on large keyrings. Adding the full ring of the keyserver to your own ring will take several *MONTHS* to complete. ADDRESSES TO USE: Users should normally use the email address "pgp-public-keys@keys.pgp.net" or your national servers using one of: pgp-public-keys@keys.at.pgp.net pgp-public-keys@keys.au.pgp.net pgp-public-keys@keys.cz.pgp.net pgp-public-keys@keys.de.pgp.net pgp-public-keys@keys.es.pgp.net pgp-public-keys@keys.fi.pgp.net pgp-public-keys@keys.hr.pgp.net pgp-public-keys@keys.hu.pgp.net pgp-public-keys@keys.kr.pgp.net pgp-public-keys@keys.nl.pgp.net pgp-public-keys@keys.no.pgp.net pgp-public-keys@keys.pl.pgp.net pgp-public-keys@keys.se.pgp.net pgp-public-keys@keys.tw.pgp.net pgp-public-keys@keys.uk.pgp.net pgp-public-keys@keys.us.pgp.net for the email interface, "ftp://ftp.pgp.net/pub/pgp/" for FTP, and "http://www.pgp.net/pgpnet/" for WWW access. Users are recommended to use the "*.pgp.net" addresses above as these are stable and reliable. -----PKSD------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 05:15:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B961F16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 05:15:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from timothy@open-networks.net) Received: from titan.open-networks.net (ns.open-networks.net [202.173.176.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5099F43D48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 05:15:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from timothy@open-networks.net) Received: from [192.168.1.200] (tim.open-networks.net [192.168.1.1]) by titan.open-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16629DE4 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:15:07 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <42E869DA.9020500@open-networks.net> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:15:06 +1000 From: Timothy Smith User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050721) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: problems burning multi session dvd-rw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 05:15:09 -0000 i'm having some troubles burning a multi session dvd-rw. i blanked te dvd to make sure it was in sequential mode %dvd+rw-format /dev/cd0a -blank * DVD\uffffRW format utility by , version 4.9. * 4.7GB DVD-RW media in Sequential mode detected. * blanking 100.0| i then burnt some files to it with %growisofs -Z /dev/cd0a -r -J -speed=4 /home/timothy/burning/* this burns the files sucessfully to the dvd. now according to the docs i should be able to append another session to the dvd with the -M option. this is what i get %growisofs -M /dev/cd0a -r -J -speed=4 /home/timothy/burning/* :-( unable to pread64(2) primary volume descriptor: Invalid argument you most likely want to use -Z option. i'm using 4.10 and an LG multiformat dvd burner. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 06:14:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB4816A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:14:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwm-dated-1122963262.d73fca@mired.org) Received: from delight.idiom.com (delight.idiom.com [216.240.32.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E813A43D49 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:14:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwm-dated-1122963262.d73fca@mired.org) Received: from idiom.com (idiom.com [216.240.32.1]) by delight.idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E678817 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:14:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mired.org (mwm@idiom [216.240.32.1]) by idiom.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j6S6EF3N097290 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:14:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mwm-dated-1122963262.d73fca@mired.org) Received: (qmail 59252 invoked by uid 1001); 28 Jul 2005 06:14:23 -0000 Received: by localhost.mired.org (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1001); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 02:14:22 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17128.30644.716964.373363@bhuda.mired.org> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 02:14:12 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid X-Primary-Address: mwm@mired.org X-face: "5Mnwy%?j>IIV\)A=):rjWL~NB2aH[}Yq8Z=u~vJ`"(,&SiLvbbz2W`; h9L,Yg`+vb1>RG% *h+%X^n0EZd>TM8_IB;a8F?(Fb"lw'IgCoyM.[Lg#r\ From: Mike Meyer X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) Cc: Subject: video playback not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:14:20 -0000 I moved a bunch of mpegs (and other video formats) to a 5.4 box running on a P4 from a 5.3 box running on a Thunderbird of some flavor or another. On the 5.3 box, they worked just fine. On the 5.4 box, they don't display any video. Instead, they display a black and red checkerboard. I get the same behavior from xine and plaympeg, so I presume that there is some common library they use that is causing this problem, but the only video stuff that the two ports have in common according to "make all-depends-list" is X. Both systems running X.org. The 5.3 system had an old nvidea card in it (Diamond 550, I think). The 5.4 system has on-board SiS video. Searching google, the FreeBSD bugs database - for bugs with xine and plaympeg - and the FreeBSD web site all turned up nothing. I'm sort of at a loss as to how to go about debugging this problem. Any clues on things to try to figure out what's busted would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, http://www.mired.org/consulting.html Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 06:36:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD78516A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:36:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from server.absolute-media.de (server.absolute-media.de [213.239.231.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657C043D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:36:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2808C8B3; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:36:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.absolute-media.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26557-05; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:36:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firewall.demig (p50839673.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.131.150.115]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8AD8C580; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:36:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ws-ew-3 (ws-ew-3.w2kdemig [192.168.1.72]) by firewall.demig (8.13.4/8.13.1) with SMTP id j6S6VptP012737; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:31:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) From: "Norbert Koch" To: "Heinrich Rebehn" , "freebsd-questions" Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:31:51 +0200 Message-ID: <002601c5933e$09fc1ce0$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <42E79FFF.4010409@ant.uni-bremen.de> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at absolute-media.de Cc: Subject: RE: Problem with isc-dhcp3-server and etherboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:36:39 -0000 > after upgrading isc-dhcp3-server to 3.0.3, my etherboot bootprom (5.4.0, > PXE) stopped working. It reports "No IP Address". > > Has anyone else observed this? (I will also report this to the etherboot > ML). I just upgraded to 3.0.3. I can only report to have no problems with etherboot 5.2.4. > After downgrading the package to 3.0.1.r14_6, etherboot is working again. > > Some questions concerning portupgrade: > - Is there any way to downgrade to a previous version? (In this case i > was lucky that there still was an old binary package) sysutils/portdowngrade > - Is there any config file i can change to make '-b' the default for > portupgrade? I don't know that switch to make. Norbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 06:54:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53C516A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:54:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from valerio.daelli@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5337243D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:54:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from valerio.daelli@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so357009wra for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:54:16 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=soV1cKQCFVPlBjDsZsBbgIiJusCp/mj/5RFqbKmopTZfqOD/P4v/CUPM9iixteFIDvuYLHUOvXv2p9IGr3mVQN4QJQoXeWUYgQo4WJoMpBd520P5kGjAChEBgUoYSeNPi79F9zZbzlaF/MmYrIxA87581q89VMQ9Q6au01+7wfg= Received: by 10.54.45.14 with SMTP id s14mr699222wrs; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:54:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.160.11 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:54:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <27dbfc8c05072723541955ba02@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:54:16 +0200 From: Valerio daelli To: questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Grub not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Valerio daelli List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:54:17 -0000 Hello=20 I am trying to install grub as a boot loader on my disk. I installed it from ports. When I try to install it on the MBR I get the error Running "install /boot/grub/stage1 (hd0) /boot/grub/stage2 p /boot/grub/me= nu.l st "... failed Error 29: Disk write error I tried to install it with 'grub-install '(hd0)'' and with grub -> root (hd0,a) -> setup (hd0). I tried deinstalling the port and installing from sources (version 0.97). I don't think the problem is with menu.lst since I am using it with linux (identical file) and it works. Anyone a guess? Thanks Valerio Daelli From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 07:52:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F88A16A420 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:52:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from i.tanusheff@procreditbank.bg) Received: from mail.procreditbank.bg (mail.procreditbank.bg [212.95.179.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A57D43D69 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:51:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from i.tanusheff@procreditbank.bg) Received: (qmail 47993 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2005 10:51:50 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Jul 2005 10:51:50 +0300 Received: from proxy.procreditbank.bg ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.procreditbank.bg [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 09653-731 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:51:49 +0300 (EEST) Received: (qmail 47981 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2005 07:51:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO outmail.procreditbank.bg) (172.16.248.123) by mail.procreditbank.bg with SMTP; 28 Jul 2005 07:51:49 -0000 In-Reply-To: <000601c5929c$a0304a80$0201a8c0@IVAN> To: "Ivan Carey" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.1 January 21, 2004 From: Ivailo Tanusheff Message-ID: Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:51:46 +0300 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on DOMINO_HQ/PROCREDITBANK(Release 6.5.1|January 21, 2004) at 07/28/2005 10:51:49 AM, Serialize complete at 07/28/2005 10:51:49 AM X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at procreditbank.bg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shutdown -r now will not reboot pc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:52:04 -0000 "Ivan Carey" Sent by: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 07/27/2005 02:16 PM To cc Subject Shutdown -r now will not reboot pc Hello, I'm using FreeBSD 5.3 When I try to reboot the pc with shutdown -r now the system gets as far as rebooting and hangs there. Is there maybe a setup in the bios to allow the pc to reboot. Thanks, Ivan I'm not sure I understand you right, but if your kernel has no APM enabled, then you'll not be able to automaticaly reboot the machine that way. Hope this helps :) Ivailo Tanusheff Senior System administrator ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD tel. +359 2 921 7161 fax +359 2 921 7110 http://www.procreditbank.bg Disclaimer: The information contained in this message is intended solely for the use of individual or entity to whom it is addressed and other authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your system. ProCredit Bank is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this message nor for any delay in its receipt. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 07:53:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CCBF16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:53:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from i.tanusheff@procreditbank.bg) Received: from mail.procreditbank.bg (mail.procreditbank.bg [212.95.179.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF94E43D53 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:53:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from i.tanusheff@procreditbank.bg) Received: (qmail 48055 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2005 10:53:34 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Jul 2005 10:53:34 +0300 Received: from proxy.procreditbank.bg ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.procreditbank.bg [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 09654-749 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:53:33 +0300 (EEST) Received: (qmail 48043 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2005 07:53:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO outmail.procreditbank.bg) (172.16.248.123) by mail.procreditbank.bg with SMTP; 28 Jul 2005 07:53:33 -0000 In-Reply-To: <000001c59206$2d342ba0$5402a8c0@intern> To: "Kanwar Singh" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.1 January 21, 2004 From: Ivailo Tanusheff Message-ID: Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:53:31 +0300 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on DOMINO_HQ/PROCREDITBANK(Release 6.5.1|January 21, 2004) at 07/28/2005 10:53:34 AM, Serialize complete at 07/28/2005 10:53:34 AM X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at procreditbank.bg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: QUESTION. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:53:51 -0000 You must burn the image to the CD, not just copy image file :) Ivailo Tanusheff Senior System administrator ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD tel. +359 2 921 7161 fax +359 2 921 7110 http://www.procreditbank.bg Disclaimer: The information contained in this message is intended solely for the use of individual or entity to whom it is addressed and other authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your system. ProCredit Bank is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this message nor for any delay in its receipt. "Kanwar Singh" Sent by: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 07/26/2005 08:19 PM To cc Subject QUESTION. I am trying to get BSD 5 on my system. I copied the image file on the CD, but cant get the system to boot form the CD. I have tried changing the boot order, but still does not work. I was wondering if I need to copy an additional file, like a boot.ini file to make the system boot form the image CD. Awaiting your reply. Thank you. Sincerely, Kanwar Singh New Business-International Buyer ********* Launch 3 Communications,Inc. 141 Lanza Avenue Building 3C Garfield, New Jersey 07026 USA Voice: 646.435.2802 Fax: 646.536.3866 Web: http://www.launch3.net Email: kanwar@launch3.net AOL IM: Kanwar at Launch3 MSN: s_umrao@hotmail.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 08:05:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8CB716A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:05:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rebehn@ant.uni-bremen.de) Received: from antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de (antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de [134.102.176.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18DD43D58 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:05:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rebehn@ant.uni-bremen.de) Received: from bremerhaven.ant.uni-bremen.de ([134.102.176.10]) by antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de with esmtp (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1Dy3Oe-0004l9-7V; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:05:43 +0200 Message-ID: <42E89217.5040707@ant.uni-bremen.de> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:06:47 +0200 From: Heinrich Rebehn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050513 Debian/1.7.8-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Reisenweber?= References: <42E79FFF.4010409@ant.uni-bremen.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Jörg Reisenweber wrote: > Moin Heinrich, > > Am 27.07.2005 um 16:53 schrieb Heinrich Rebehn: > >> - Is there any way to downgrade to a previous version? (In this case >> i was lucky that there still was an old binary package) > > > I just saw portdowngrade (/usr/ports/sysutils/portdowngrade - http:// > sourceforge.net/projects/portdowngrade/) in the ports collection. Maybe > it's worth a look. > >> - Is there any config file i can change to make '-b' the default for >> portupgrade? > > > You may set the PORTUPGRADE variable in your environment according to > the portupgrade manpage. > Thanks, i missed that one. I will also try out portdowngrade [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.8 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Problem with isc-dhcp3-server and etherboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:05:46 -0000 Jörg Reisenweber wrote: > Moin Heinrich, > > Am 27.07.2005 um 16:53 schrieb Heinrich Rebehn: > >> - Is there any way to downgrade to a previous version? (In this case >> i was lucky that there still was an old binary package) > > > I just saw portdowngrade (/usr/ports/sysutils/portdowngrade - http:// > sourceforge.net/projects/portdowngrade/) in the ports collection. Maybe > it's worth a look. > >> - Is there any config file i can change to make '-b' the default for >> portupgrade? > > > You may set the PORTUPGRADE variable in your environment according to > the portupgrade manpage. > Thanks, i missed that one. I will also try out portdowngrade Heinrich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 09:00:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9AD16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:00:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B6643D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:00:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [82.41.37.55] ([82.41.37.55]) by smtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:01:11 +0100 Message-ID: <42E89EA9.7000508@dial.pipex.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:00:25 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050530 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marius Korsmo References: <20050728031706.fsbcd03hh4lcsg8g@elwolfie.com> In-Reply-To: <20050728031706.fsbcd03hh4lcsg8g@elwolfie.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2005 09:01:11.0444 (UTC) FILETIME=[E68BA540:01C59352] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make buildworld fails in openssl/colldef [SOLVED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:00:28 -0000 Marius Korsmo wrote: >It took two weeks to fix this problem, and therefore I do have a few questions. > >The error turned out to be in err.h. The file located in /usr/include was >totally different from the one located in /usr/src/include. > >< /*- >< * Copyright (c) 1993 >< *The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. >--- > > >>/* crypto/err/err.h */ >>/* Copyright (C) 1995-1998 Eric Young (eay@cryptsoft.com) >> * All rights reserved. >> >> > >You can see the entire diff at http://pastebin.com/322918 > >My question is: I deleted /usr/src, and I cvsup'ed everything. When I do a make >buildworld, why does not the new err.h get copied from /usr/src/include to >/usr/include? This would have solved my problem two weeks ago :) > > build = recompile things install = put them where they belong in the filesystem buildworld doesn't install the file because it's not supposed to. >Does err.h get copied only when you do a make installworld? > > I would expect so. Why don't you try it? >Another question, why on earth did I have an old version of err.h? I was running >5.4 RELEASE, and it was installed from an ISO downloaded at FreeBSD.org > > That does not look like an *old* version, it looks like a completely different file. Did you install anything not from ports that might have overwritten it? Did you try and install a port into a target hierarchy that /usr/local? (The same copyright header as the real 5.4 one exists in err.h from 4.11). Operating system bugs are rare compared to user errors, I'm afraid. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 09:08:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB44916A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:08:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com) Received: from mx20.fujixerox.co.jp (mx20.fujixerox.co.jp [192.26.96.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8F343D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:08:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com) Received: from isvw20.fujixerox.co.jp ([129.249.27.140]) by mx20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6S98c5h001014 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:08:38 +0900 (JST) Received: from ms20.fujixerox.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by isvw20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6S98c4v001429 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:08:38 +0900 (JST) Received: from ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (ms1 [129.249.27.192]) by ms20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6S98chD005766 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:08:38 +0900 (JST) Received: from sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com ([13.198.8.73]) by ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (8.11.6p2a/3.7W) with ESMTP id j6S98am06421 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:08:37 +0900 (JST) Received: from mailhost.sgp.fujixerox.com by sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com with ESMTP id 98567911122541694; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:08:14 +0800 Received: from imss.sgp.fujixerox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455F91D9C0 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:08:07 +0800 (SGT) Received: from sess.xssc.sgp.xerox.com (unknown [13.198.33.122]) by imss.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33EC61D9B1 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:08:07 +0800 (SGT) From: Xu Qiang To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:11:29 +0800 X-Sent-Folder-Path: Sent Items X-Mailer: Oracle Connector for Outlook 9.0.4 60130 (9.0.2711) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20050728090807.33EC61D9B1@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> Subject: groupadd/useradd in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:08:40 -0000 Hi, all: = I am installing MySQL 4.1.13 into my machine. It has finished successfully.= But before or after that, I need create some user account rather than root= by the command "groupadd mysql" and "useradd -g mysql mysql". = However, these commands are not found in my FreeBSD 5.3 system. = Any help on this issue? thanks, = Regards, Xu Qiang From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 09:10:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A352016A420 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:10:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@orbweavers.co.uk) Received: from mail.orbweavers.co.uk (213-152-38-100.dsl.eclipse.net.uk [213.152.38.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827BC43D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:10:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@orbweavers.co.uk) Received: from www.orbweavers.co.uk (localhost.orbweavers.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) by mail.orbweavers.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27D2B2B88; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:10:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from 217.37.3.201 (SquirrelMail authenticated user martin) by www.orbweavers.co.uk with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:10:37 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <1136.217.37.3.201.1122541837.squirrel@www.orbweavers.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <1559.192.168.0.10.1122502486.squirrel@192.168.0.5> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:10:37 +0100 (BST) From: martin@orbweavers.co.uk To: "Garance A Drosihn" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shell script frustration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:10:40 -0000 > At 11:14 PM +0100 7/27/05, martin@orbweavers.co.uk wrote: >> >>echo ldapdelete -W -D $binddn \"cn=$1, $group_base\" >>ldapdelete -W -D $binddn \"cn=$1, $group_base\" > > >>when run ('./rmgroup users') it outputs - >> >>ldapdelete -W -D "cn=Manager,dc=orbweavers,dc=co,dc=uk" "cn=users, >>ou=groups,dc=orbweavers,dc=co,dc=uk" >>Enter LDAP Password: >>ldap_bind: Invalid DN syntax (34) >> additional info: invalid DN >> >>However, if I copy and paste the echod statement (the first line >>of the output) straight to the shell, it run fine. > > What I do in this cases is create a script called "list_args.sh": > > #!/bin/sh > printf "\nlist_args.sh at `date +%H:%M:%S` with \$# = $#\n" > # Process all parameters. > N=0 > while test $# != 0 ; do > N=$(($N+1)) > printf " \$$N = [%3d] '$1'\n" ${#1} > shift > done > > Then in your script, replace the ldapdelete command with > list_args.sh. That way you'll see *exactly* what ldapdelete > is seeing for parameters, and that might help. I tried that one, with an echo $* - though I assume the printf prints it out 'more precise'? I've come up with a work around - in my slapd.conf I have quotes around the rootdn, if I take them off it works fine (I did try it without the quotes around the variable, but that didn't work either, much confusion) I'd love to know what was causing the problem, but enough time is spend on it. I will update the script to strip off quotes when found, which should sort it out. I now have the LDAP tools I discussed earlier written. Very rough and ready, but they do the job I want, so they are 'complete' in that respect! We have: adduser - adds a user, and a group if it does not already exist rmuser - removes a user rmgroup - removes a group users - prints a list of users found, or details if a username is passed groups - prints a list of groups found, or details if a groupname is passed passwd - change a user password They are certainly not ready for an end user, but if anyone wants to make use of them or polish them up a bit, let me know and I will send them to you. I will put them up on my site at some point over the week. Cheers, Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 09:15:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC4716A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:15:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@reusel.de) Received: from azure.internetking.de (internetking.de [213.239.216.77]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA9A443D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:15:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@reusel.de) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (p54819ED3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.129.158.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by azure.internetking.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BED1AFE; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:15:20 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20050728090807.33EC61D9B1@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> References: <20050728090807.33EC61D9B1@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Message-Id: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Reisenweber?= Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:15:19 +0200 To: Xu Qiang X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: groupadd/useradd in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:15:22 -0000 Hi, Am 28.07.2005 um 11:11 schrieb Xu Qiang: > I need create some user account rather than root by the command =20 > "groupadd mysql" and "useradd -g mysql mysql". pw groupadd mysql ; pw useradd mysql -g mysql J=F6rg= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 09:16:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4577A16A420 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:16:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vdm.fbsd@virgilio.it) Received: from vsmtp14.tin.it (vsmtp14.tin.it [212.216.176.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C982443D4C for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:16:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vdm.fbsd@virgilio.it) Received: from ims1d.cp.tin.it (192.168.70.101) by vsmtp14.tin.it (7.2.060.1) id 42E2842D00208F25 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:16:12 +0200 Received: from [192.168.70.183] by ims1d.cp.tin.it with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:16:08 +0200 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:16:08 +0200 Message-ID: <42DC14FE0003EB30@ims1d.cp.tin.it> From: vdm.fbsd@virgilio.it To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: 193.108.204.21 Subject: Problems with booting & MBR X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:16:15 -0000 In the first disk ad0 (master) of a computer at office I had installed li= nux to be used as a postgresql server. Later I installed FreeBSD 5.4 (just to= have a go at it) on a partition of the second disk ad1 (slave) to be a p= ostgrresql server too. Linux lilo was the boot loader, booting linux by default and freebsd. Now, convinced of the high quality of the latter I eliminated linux from the first disk unfortunately without modifying lilo, and reshuffled the F= reeBSD filesystem as in my latest /etc/fstab using also the first disk: # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump P= ass# /dev/ad1s2b none swap sw 0 0= /dev/ad1s2a / ufs rw 1 1= /dev/ad0s1a /usr/local ufs rw 0 0= /dev/ad0s1d /var ufs rw 0 0= /dev/ad0s1e /tmp ufs rw 0 0= /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0= Now, even though I read the booting procedure in the handbook and somewhe= re else in the internet, issuing the various "fdisk -b B", "disklabel -b .."= , "boot0cfg ..", I was completely unable to modify the MBR and make this Fr= eeBSD only computer boot directly into this OS. What should I do with the configuration I have? A straightforward and step by step explanation is highly appreciated. P.S. Is it possible that some problems can arise by the fact that I used an "a" slice (ad0s1a)for mounting /usr/local and freebsd starts from ad1s= 1a? Ciao Vittorio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 09:21:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461D916A420 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:21:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sysjo@hades.yoafrica.com) Received: from cortizone.yoafrica.com (cortizone.yoafrica.com [196.44.176.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA45843D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:20:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sysjo@hades.yoafrica.com) Received: from hades.yoafrica.com ([196.44.177.50] ident=postfix) by cortizone.yoafrica.com with esmtp (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1Dy4ZI-000FXV-3p; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:20:44 +0000 Received: by hades.yoafrica.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DCB66614A; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:20:40 +0200 (CAT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:20:40 +0200 From: John Oxley To: Xu Qiang Message-ID: <20050728092040.GA92138@yoafrica.com> References: <20050728090807.33EC61D9B1@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050728090807.33EC61D9B1@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: groupadd/useradd in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:21:06 -0000 --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 05:11:29PM +0800, Xu Qiang wrote: > Hi, all:=20 >=20 > I am installing MySQL 4.1.13 into my machine. It has finished successfull= y. But before or after that, I need create some user account rather than ro= ot by the command "groupadd mysql" and "useradd -g mysql mysql".=20 >=20 > However, these commands are not found in my FreeBSD 5.3 system.=20 Try "pw groupadd help" and "pw useradd help". -John --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIIIkgYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIIIgzCCCH8CAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMAsGCSqGSIb3DQEHAaCC BhYwggLPMIICOKADAgECAgMO0a0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAj BgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQ ZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA1MDUzMTA2NTEzMloXDTA2MDUzMTA2 NTEzMlowQzEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEgMB4GCSqGSIb3DQEJ ARYRam9obkB5b2FmcmljYS5jb20wggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDa ZqyI7h6jGtwHQhbqtJlwQy9isJivpp+Cju1sorwJG0FE7Irqoc4impUG6aBGVFjunlMwA76A d6NInU9+KIwr1SRJO4d6qZQhUq810QMpj3vrn7TOtPbnrqKiK1tU//86WVuJHGVc3/4pYpmP jSSilAV8Gj+12YJlKP2ClbnkUF0PwDvEVlJxRjIqrW6Crl5SeCqyJ+JxFK7WQVQ6+nusuO37 0qj0FytU2IE8kxqveKstObVUwd0lQhNTS29e2ytvcNgXk2TrqlBhLpxV9xh/l52jYlRXk8aP HYxnWU/iJmXCgLl9NADpwaV3xajGyFMNSK1Plsm/r4GthtA5vdPXAgMBAAGjLjAsMBwGA1Ud EQQVMBOBEWpvaG5AeW9hZnJpY2EuY29tMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAD gYEAV+aYxxGXhdvzxI4uT4EAKvxdqGzZ1ZVAjoszmpNp2nLTMZ+juzSoqT+SiwoaLQia/T+m BIInP+JnRelE5up8zd1JXHxCjB8StssZNusEE8Hz2c/hZyAIyEdmRRY/mwlHntBu7nkNnmuq LuSeBR8g+ChtyOHZ+IyUnYDlWtUrLM4wggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUA MIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBl IFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0 aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1h aWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcN MDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcNMTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMc VGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFs IEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVz VftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnw K4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/EfkTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gE f6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8E PDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFp bENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8EBAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVM YWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSd f0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQcUCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2p nDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bGCE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYICRDCC AkACAQEwaTBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0 eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EC Aw7RrTAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoIGxMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcN AQkFMQ8XDTA1MDcyODA5MjA0MFowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFBcepCSkwbPJLmZgKKMWknWh Ps8wMFIGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFFMEMwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqG SIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBAApD s/VV/XMQqilyeo7lGOWigy23xf0v19auTK0xkLoPGTe3hfjwkjrxSJQ9GTcTzLLhIqo0UJch Jr4xbJ+CkVK/XgN0uQc00uTLP4Q9vB9vzWKLTMlVapukI3V6Oeo2G8DgZBM96SpojycaKTtB Cw0JF6CX+JFPm+V7Jmzfo8GorVa0+h38AMwhSuJ2dlQfUSDFYOTqvW3I5K3LncSsqSomRM1p pJxYN+dqqBsHvF7IXJh/b++UWBgyrth/cbFzhdiychz4lr/if91tzklhme8cR37py/qQquF2 EOFUtDUHKFAGNTyQ3wvd/rJZ9S/4Z+nzjgH8d8Dj52ctm1/ZE6M= --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 09:25:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451AF16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:25:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nospam@mgedv.net) Received: from mgedv.at (www.mgedv.at [195.3.87.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8C543D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:25:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nospam@mgedv.net) Received: from metis (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mgedv.at (SMTPServer) with ESMTP id 096B3186800 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:25:05 +0200 (MEST) From: "mdff" To: Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:25:05 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Thread-Index: AcWSMfFXh7yQ2E6dR1SJo/qSBmG0OwBIswxA In-Reply-To: <20050726183029.M97284@neptune.atopia.net> Message-Id: <20050728092506.096B3186800@mgedv.at> Subject: RE: cat /dev/urandom X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nospam@mgedv.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:25:09 -0000 > shell# cat /dev/urandom > > can that executed as root cause any harm to the system? What > if a random > sequence of `rm *` was generated... would it be executed? > the question is: WHAT FOR should someone logged in as root execute "cat /dev/urandom" without redirecting the output? anyway, from my experience of "trying" this a few times (it does not matter if on a local console or using a ssh-client) sometimes there's code left in the commandline afterwards and if you hit enter, it's executed... directly executed strings i've also seen. for now, i didn't have the occurrence of any system-command being generated, but that's random... the unlucky one would get it asap ;-) if you like to get RANDOM content anywhere use dd instead of cat. example to erase a whole disk i'd type: dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/ bs=1024k be sure that the devicefile exists, or you'll fill up your /root fs. br... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 09:25:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D5F16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:25:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (blackend.org [212.11.35.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B947543D48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:25:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from gothic.blackend.org (gothic.blackend.org [192.168.1.203]) by abigail.blackend.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6S9PPHC066379; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:25:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@abigail.blackend.org) Received: from gothic.blackend.org (localhost.blackend.org [127.0.0.1]) by gothic.blackend.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6S9PPMY000681; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:25:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@gothic.blackend.org) Received: (from marc@localhost) by gothic.blackend.org (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6S9POeq000680; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:25:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:25:24 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille To: Timothy Smith Message-ID: <20050728092524.GA609@gothic.blackend.org> References: <42E869DA.9020500@open-networks.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42E869DA.9020500@open-networks.net> X-Useless-Header: blackend.org X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems burning multi session dvd-rw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:25:29 -0000 On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 03:15:06PM +1000, Timothy Smith wrote: > i'm having some troubles burning a multi session dvd-rw. i blanked te > dvd to make sure it was in sequential mode > > %dvd+rw-format /dev/cd0a -blank > * DVD\uffffRW format utility by , version 4.9. > * 4.7GB DVD-RW media in Sequential mode detected. > * blanking 100.0| > [...] Try to upgrade to a more up to date version of dvd+rw-tools and try with -blank=full option. Marc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 09:27:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21B116A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:27:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmp.lists@alvorlig.dk) Received: from cauchy.aub.dk (mail.aub.dk [195.24.1.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4601643D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:27:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmp.lists@alvorlig.dk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cauchy.aub.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE9311532; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:27:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cauchy.aub.dk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cauchy.aub.dk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 53715-04; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:27:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.1.4.50] (jmp.aub.dk [10.1.4.50]) by cauchy.aub.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1461152B; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:27:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E8A4EF.7060305@alvorlig.dk> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:27:11 +0200 From: "J. Martin Petersen" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050721) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Xu Qiang References: <20050728090807.33EC61D9B1@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> In-Reply-To: <20050728090807.33EC61D9B1@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at aub.dk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: groupadd/useradd in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:27:17 -0000 Xu Qiang wrote: > Hi, all: > > I am installing MySQL 4.1.13 into my machine. It has finished successfully. But before or after that, I need create some user account rather than root by the command "groupadd mysql" and "useradd -g mysql mysql". > > However, these commands are not found in my FreeBSD 5.3 system. > > Any help on this issue? You're looking for adduser(8). If you install MySQL from ports, though, the user will be added automatically. Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 09:37:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1744D16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:37:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com) Received: from mx20.fujixerox.co.jp (mx20.fujixerox.co.jp [192.26.96.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7705243D55 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:36:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com) Received: from isvw20.fujixerox.co.jp ([129.249.27.140]) by mx20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6S9avxA007313; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:36:57 +0900 (JST) Received: from ms20.fujixerox.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by isvw20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6S9avg5012954; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:36:57 +0900 (JST) Received: from ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (ms1 [129.249.27.192]) by ms20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6S9avDs019975; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:36:57 +0900 (JST) Received: from sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com ([13.198.8.73]) by ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (8.11.6p2a/3.7W) with ESMTP id j6S9atm10110; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:36:55 +0900 (JST) Received: from mailhost.sgp.fujixerox.com by sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com with ESMTP id 98616961122543385; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:36:25 +0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B4901D92E; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:36:18 +0800 (SGT) Received: from sess.xssc.sgp.xerox.com (unknown [13.198.33.122]) by imss.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5318F1D92E; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:36:13 +0800 (SGT) From: Xu Qiang To: =?iso-8859-1?B?SvZyZyBSZWlzZW53ZWJlcg==?= , Xu Qiang Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:39:35 +0800 X-Sent-Folder-Path: Sent Items X-Mailer: Oracle Connector for Outlook 9.0.4 60130 (9.0.2711) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20050728093613.5318F1D92E@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: groupadd/useradd in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:37:00 -0000 J=F6rg Reisenweber wrote: > = > pw groupadd mysql ; pw useradd mysql -g mysql Thanks for providing the correct usage of "pw useradd". = At first sight, I thought your "pw useradd mysql -g mysql" is a typo, which= misplaced the first "mysql" and "-g" option, so I used "pw useradd -g mysq= l mysql", but got an error saying "pw: user name or id required" Then I "man pw", and found the usage of (pw) user add is a little different= from the standard ones: = pw [-V etcdir] useradd [name|uid] [-C config] [-q] [-n name] [-u uid] [-c comment] [-d dir] [-e date] [-p date] [-g group] [-G grouplist] [-m] [-k dir] [-w method] [-s shell] [-o] [-L class] [-h fd | -H fd] [-N] [-P] [-Y] In FreeBSD, it should be "pw useradd username -g groupname", and not "pw us= eradd -g groupname username". = Last but not least, thanks for everyone who helped me in this thread. = Regards, Xu Qiang From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 09:53:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2F716A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:53:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com) Received: from mx20.fujixerox.co.jp (mx20.fujixerox.co.jp [192.26.96.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F0343D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:53:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com) Received: from isvw20.fujixerox.co.jp ([129.249.27.140]) by mx20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6S9qxaa009569 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:52:59 +0900 (JST) Received: from ms20.fujixerox.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by isvw20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6S9qwwK018154 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:52:58 +0900 (JST) Received: from ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (ms1 [129.249.27.192]) by ms20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6S9qwiq025678 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:52:58 +0900 (JST) Received: from sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com ([13.198.8.73]) by ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (8.11.6p2a/3.7W) with ESMTP id j6S9qvm12175 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:52:57 +0900 (JST) Received: from mailhost.sgp.fujixerox.com by sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com with ESMTP id 98643691122544353; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:52:33 +0800 Received: from imss.sgp.fujixerox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257DA1D93C for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:52:26 +0800 (SGT) Received: from sess.xssc.sgp.xerox.com (unknown [13.198.33.122]) by imss.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152C61D938 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:52:26 +0800 (SGT) From: Xu Qiang To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:55:47 +0800 X-Sent-Folder-Path: Sent Items X-Mailer: Oracle Connector for Outlook 9.0.4 60130 (9.0.2711) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20050728095226.152C61D938@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> Subject: RE: groupadd/useradd in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:53:01 -0000 Btw, Just think of this problem: = Although I have added the user "mysql" to my machine, I didn't set its pass= word. When does this newly added user get his/her password and change it? thanks, = Regards, Xu Qiang From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 09:55:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB5A16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:55:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nospam@mgedv.net) Received: from mgedv.at (www.mgedv.at [195.3.87.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0295743D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:55:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nospam@mgedv.net) Received: from metis (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mgedv.at (SMTPServer) with ESMTP id BF6A9186800 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:55:47 +0200 (MEST) From: "mdff" To: Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:55:47 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Thread-Index: AcWSWet18xWO1Q1mRMejsu/996fwXAA/8lkQ In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <20050728095547.BF6A9186800@mgedv.at> Subject: RE: I got my vsftpd core dumped. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nospam@mgedv.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:55:49 -0000 > Hello guys, > i always got my vsftpd core dumped and i have no idea why is that > happening all the time... > There 's some informations below. > > www# tail /var/log/messages > Jul 27 11:07:59 www kernel: pid 28994 (httpd), uid 80: exited > on signal 11 httpd=vsftpd here? if not, both have probably the same problem. try truss-ing one of them (i'd prefer vsftpd) to see what's called before the SIGSEGV. if you chrooted them, check for missing devicefiles, libraries or permissions. br From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 10:34:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B4816A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:34:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from 123asd123@email.si) Received: from www1.email.si (www1.email.si [81.24.97.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99D243D5E for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:34:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from 123asd123@email.si) Received: from localhost (unknown [81.24.97.11]) by www1.email.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EAD18B859 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:34:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 193.2.237.30 (JAW authenticated user 123asd123@email.si) by www2.email.si with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:35:49 +0200 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:35:49 +0200 X-Mailer: JAW::Mail 1.0-email.si From: "asd asd" <123asd123@email.si> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <20050728103430.3EAD18B859@www1.email.si> Subject: boot problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:34:34 -0000 Hello! I have problem with booting FreeBSD 5.4 on my laptop Toshiba Satellite 2410= -304: sometimes it boots without problem but sometimes it stops at line "uhci0: <= Intel 82801CA/CAM (ICH3) USB controller USB-A> port 0xefe0-0xefff irq 11 at devic= e 29.0 on pci0". Previous line is initialization of the Nvidia Grforce4 420Go graphic adapter. Any idea what could be causing this problem? BR, Jure ____________________ http://www.email.si/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 10:39:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC9816A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:39:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DDA143D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:39:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2005 10:39:20 -0000 Received: from 40.80.76.83.cust.bluewin.ch (EHLO [192.168.1.11]) [83.76.80.40] by mail.gmx.net (mp009) with SMTP; 28 Jul 2005 12:39:20 +0200 X-Authenticated: #912863 Message-ID: <42E8B5DF.8010406@gmx.at> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:39:27 +0200 From: lars User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050722) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Glaschke References: <42E69846.6050900@gmx.at> <20050726235947.GA573@jogla.fbsd> In-Reply-To: <20050726235947.GA573@jogla.fbsd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with Opera Plug-ins X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:39:23 -0000 Jonathan Glaschke wrote: > I think you need "linux-opera" because this is a linux plugin. > -Jonathan Installing linux-opera solved the problem, thanks a lot. Kind regards, lars. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 10:40:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC0F16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:40:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benlutz@datacomm.ch) Received: from maxlor.mine.nu (c-213-160-32-54.customer.ggaweb.ch [213.160.32.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59D443D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:40:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benlutz@datacomm.ch) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06183D3; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:40:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maxlor.mine.nu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (midgard [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 92033-05; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:40:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.0.0.23] (mini.intranet [10.0.0.23]) by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1399A65; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:40:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E8B61C.8070000@datacomm.ch> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:40:28 +0200 From: Benjamin Lutz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jumbler chi References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig542C49C616189E24469BF15E" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at maxlor.mine.nu Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: delete partition from MO X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:40:43 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig542C49C616189E24469BF15E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > then , the MO capacity is 2.6G. But the real mounted capacity is 1.2G. > [...] > What's wrong about to delete original partition and the capacity ? Nothing, works as advertised. It's a bad habit of manufacturers of backup hardware to advertise twice the capacity that their hardware actually has, because they figure that users will be able to compress their data by 50%. Your dmesg confirms this: > da1: 1243MB (1273011 1024 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 79C) Cheers Benjamin --------------enig542C49C616189E24469BF15E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iD8DBQFC6LYggShs4qbRdeQRAiZ2AJ0V4lW3XXfvbvPfi1bCpJNFtZNMvQCdEr1U btme6dsOwxkleb1j0DKvh+4= =+YyR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig542C49C616189E24469BF15E-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 10:46:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C23D516A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:46:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benlutz@datacomm.ch) Received: from maxlor.mine.nu (c-213-160-32-54.customer.ggaweb.ch [213.160.32.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5D443D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:46:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benlutz@datacomm.ch) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A803F7; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:46:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maxlor.mine.nu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (midgard [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 92033-10; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:46:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.0.0.23] (mini.intranet [10.0.0.23]) by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF8065; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:46:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E8B777.7010908@datacomm.ch> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:46:15 +0200 From: Benjamin Lutz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Valerio daelli References: <27dbfc8c05072723541955ba02@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <27dbfc8c05072723541955ba02@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE900299AD2CD1E5F454C100D" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at maxlor.mine.nu Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Grub not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:46:29 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE900299AD2CD1E5F454C100D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Valerio daelli wrote: > I am trying to install grub as a boot loader on my disk. > I installed it from ports. > When I try to install it on the MBR I get the error > [...] > Error 29: Disk write error Two guesses: - You can't write to a disks MBR while it's being used. I've seen this myself, but I'm not exactly why this is, or how it can be circumvented (other than booting from another device). - You have MBR protection ("Virus Protection") in your BIOS enabled. Cheers Benjamin --------------enigE900299AD2CD1E5F454C100D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iD8DBQFC6Ld7gShs4qbRdeQRAiVTAKCJggYs1IUAF8v9gFxnv7SEBFxlMQCfSfJ5 GoRqM0QB33H+ExwjMW0+A58= =hkWX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE900299AD2CD1E5F454C100D-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 11:12:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A51D16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:12:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC1E43D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:12:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.4) with SMTP id VAA08845; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:12:53 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:12:52 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050727043611.1FC6416A44E@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "Gary W. Swearingen" Subject: Can someone clarify ipfw's in/out/recv/xmit/via concepts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:12:59 -0000 (Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 105, Issue 7) Gary writes: > I see in another msg that I'm not the only one scratching my head over > the ipfw manpage's explanation of in/out/recv/xmit/via concepts. I've > spent many hours reading that manpage and working on my rc.firewall > (and it seems to work OK, based on the logging), but I can't figure > out what it's trying to tell me, even with that nice ASCII art. Took me a while, measured in years, and there's lots I still don't know about features I haven't used yet (NAT, dummynet, layer 2 filtering except 'bridged' ..) but I'll have a go. > (I hope your replies will help me get some clarifications into the > manpage.) I think you really need to USE ipfw a fair bit to really 'get it', and maybe even peek at some of the code. rc.firewall only exemplifies bits of its capability. I'm unsure how really thoroughly you've read ipfw(8) though, going by some of your questions .. > ^ to upper layers v > | | > +----------->-----------+ > ^ v > [ip_input] [ip_output] net.inet.ip.fw.enable=1 > | | > ^ v > [ether_demux] [ether_output_frame] net.link.ether.ipfw=1 > | | > +-->--[bdg_forward]-->--+ net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw=1 > ^ v > | to devices | > + + > > FROM BOTH TO BOTH > NICS? NICS? >From and to whichever NICs (if any, as Chuck Swiger pointed out) may be involved with the processing of THIS particular packet. > Here's a pic of my firewall: > > +------------------------------+ > | +-------------------------+ | > | | KERNEL | | > | +-------------------------+ | > | | | | | | > | v ^ v ^ | > | | | | | | > | +-----+ +-----+ | > | | NIC | FW | NIC | | > | +-----+ +-----+ | > | | | | | | > +------------------------------+ > | | | | > v ^ v ^ > | | | | > > WAN LAN FW should here be visualised _between_ the NICs and kernel/stack, for incoming and (unless bridging or dummynet one-pass) outgoing packets. And of course between kernel/stack functions for localhost packets. > The manpage says we have incoming and outgoing packets. > In and out of what? NIC or kernel or ipfw or computer? Good question :) Think of both passes (except bridging) through the IPFW ruleset for each packet, coming in and then (maybe) going out. > The manpage describes: > recv | xmit | via {ifX | if* | ipno | any} > > Is my "de0" an "ifX" or an "if*"? > ("exact name" or "device name") > > What would be an example of the other? tun* would refer to all your tun interfaces, say. > Does "ipno" mean an numerical Internet address? > (It's not mentioned elsewhere in the manpage.) Yes - I won't say 'obviously', however searching ipfw(8) does indeed define this quite clearly: see under section 'src and dst' > Does each of my NICs have both of the manpage's xmit and recv > interfaces, or is one an xmit and one a recv for any one packet rule? Refer Chuck's response, and the manual section 'interface-spec'. Read that section about 10 times till it sinks right in (took me a while!) > If an incoming packet can be associated with an xmit interface, why > can't an outgoing packet be associated with a recv interface? No, you have this one backwards. This IS clearly if tersely explained in ipfw(8). Only outgoing packets can be tested for both recv and xmit interfaces. IPFW doesn't know where an incoming packet (recv ifX) is going yet, subject to routing and until the outbound second pass, if it's to be forwarded. > It seems that some people do their blocking of packets > going from LAN to WAN "on" (so to speak) the LAN interface, some on > the WAN interface, and some on both. It doesn't seem to make much > difference on a pure firewall, except for rule-writing convenience. > Right? Not exactly. Anything can (and will) happen on the WAN; you have a more precise idea of what you expect to be happening 'inside'; even so you should assume at least every type of ignorance, if not malice, 'inside'. Hence the importance of (eg) the anti-spoofing rules, inside and out. > I suppose it would be best to put blocks everywhere possible > or at least "where" the packets enter the computer. Right? Spend some more time with the manual; taken as a whole it's pretty good, and along with some further reading, practical playing will clue you in, even if peeking at some of the code doesn't. Try adding a few dozen 'count' rules for all sort of test situations then spend some time with 'ipfw -t show | less' Cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 11:14:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCF316A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:14:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4918543D55 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:14:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x37so82163nfc for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:14:00 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=PlWvXr3+jEkwMfQQu10Et6ZBUwg7ry17OYNQt1kkxjG6LzOZb1JG1qdB3v6fY62kj0/MF/IeChE7lDBMYrTomKMPDo/oa1Mh86GGe3yxaAqL0RpXWWrM7FgQLgTkNtcEbihia5JXMQs9+HuPnKjuVbWG8m/Mab61dpXedoEcfd8= Received: by 10.48.142.11 with SMTP id p11mr55667nfd; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:14:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.239.11 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:14:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:14:00 +0100 From: Freminlins To: FreeBSD Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Question about FreeBsd 5.4 + BIND 9.3.1 and threads X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Freminlins List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:14:03 -0000 Hello, I have a FreeBSD 5.4R box running BIND 9.3.1 from base on a dual Xeon with hyperthreading enabled. According to the man page for named: -n #cpus Create #cpus worker threads to take advantage of multiple CP= Us. If not specified, named will try to determine the number of C= PUs present and create one thread per CPU. If it is unable = to determine the number of CPUs, a single worker thread will= be created. Yet I seem to have six threads: mx01$ ps -xauwH | grep bind bind 95906 0.0 5.4 58444 56876 ?? SLs 1:16PM 143:20.01 /usr/sbin/named -u bind -t /var/named bind 95906 0.0 5.4 58444 56876 ?? SLs 1:16PM 143:20.01 /usr/sbin/named -u bind -t /var/named bind 95906 0.0 5.4 58444 56876 ?? SLs 1:16PM 143:20.01 /usr/sbin/named -u bind -t /var/named bind 95906 0.0 5.4 58444 56876 ?? SLs 1:16PM 143:20.01 /usr/sbin/named -u bind -t /var/named bind 95906 0.0 5.4 58444 56876 ?? SLs 1:16PM 143:20.01 /usr/sbin/named -u bind -t /var/named bind 95906 0.0 5.4 58444 56876 ?? SLs 1:16PM 143:20.01 /usr/sbin/named -u bind -t /var/named Does this mean there is a bug in BIND, or am I missing something? Thanks, Frem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 11:18:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85D816A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:18:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (blackend.org [212.11.35.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00FA343D55 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:18:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from gothic.blackend.org (gothic.blackend.org [192.168.1.203]) by abigail.blackend.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6SBIXY6068273; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:18:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@abigail.blackend.org) Received: from gothic.blackend.org (localhost.blackend.org [127.0.0.1]) by gothic.blackend.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6SBIXDp001681; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:18:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@gothic.blackend.org) Received: (from marc@localhost) by gothic.blackend.org (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6SBITie001680; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:18:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:18:29 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille To: Erik =?iso-8859-1?Q?N=F8rgaard?= Message-ID: <20050728111829.GH609@gothic.blackend.org> References: <42E0CCE6.3030709@locolomo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <42E0CCE6.3030709@locolomo.org> X-Useless-Header: blackend.org X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Epson 2480/2580 scanner support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:18:38 -0000 On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 12:39:34PM +0200, Erik Nørgaard wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry if this question is misplaced, but the sane project hosts no user > mailing list, and the hardware list brought no luck. > > Looking at the handbook it seems that ny scanner supported by the sane > backend is supported on FBSD. > > Now, the ports version is 1.0.15, on the sane home page, they list > support for version 1.0.13 and the CVS version. > > I'm interested in the Epson 2480 or 2580, for the stable version 1.0.13, > they are listed with basic/minimal support while the CVS version > mentions good/basic support. (snapscan backend) > > Can anyone enlighten me as to how well these devices are supported by > the ports-version 1.0.15? > > Second, on the snapscan web page, they warn: > > > 05/22/05: Warning! > I've received a report from a user who was left with a broken scanner > after using the Epson 2480 in transparency mode in 2400 DPI with xsane. > According to the report the scanner power light went red and the scanner > "smelled hot". After power-cycling the scanner it was not possible to > scan anymore... > > > Can anyone confirm this? and know if the problem has been corrected in > newer versions? > I think you should contact the SANE's mailing list for more information regarding this issue. Marc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 11:29:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D3216A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:29:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jwm@sentinelchicken.net) Received: from lakermmtai12.cox.net (lakermmtai12.cox.net [68.230.240.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0DE43D4C for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:29:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jwm@sentinelchicken.net) Received: from sentinelchicken.net ([68.226.91.117]) by centrmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with SMTP id <20050728111715.USRY19684.centrmmtao05.cox.net@sentinelchicken.net> for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:17:15 -0400 Received: (qmail 68967 invoked by uid 1000); 28 Jul 2005 11:27:35 -0000 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:27:35 -0400 From: Jason Morgan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050728112735.GA39925@sentinelchicken.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Boot page fault - alternative kernel needed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:29:20 -0000 I have an old laptop that I am finally trying to get FreeBSD installed on. It was recently running Linux just fine, but I am having a tough time getting FreeBSD installed on it. Here is the error I get when booting. I have typed all that is visible on the screen when it crashes. # Begin isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x3000-0x300f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x 3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 1.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 uhci0: at device 1.2 on pci0 Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0xeb97b fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc00eb87c stack pointer = 0x10:0xc10209f0 frame pointer = 0x10:0xc10209f0 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 0 (swapper) trap number = 12 panic: page fault # End So, my question is: Is this the UHCI driver failing to load (happens at this same point every time I try to boot it)? Is there any way around this? Possible using a trimmed down kernel to boot? Any suggestions? Thanks in advance, Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 11:39:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7161616A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:39:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from victor@vmpbg.com) Received: from 123bg.com (123bg.com [193.68.120.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E025243D5E for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:39:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from victor@vmpbg.com) Received: (qmail 12306 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2005 08:20:20 -0000 Received: from host-201.teranet.evro.net (HELO neon.devian.bg) (83.148.125.201) by 0 with SMTP; 28 Jul 2005 08:20:20 -0000 From: Victor Semionov Organization: Devian To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:20:31 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <000001c592a1$ef621660$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> <1122507010.1281.7.camel@chaucer> In-Reply-To: <1122507010.1281.7.camel@chaucer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507281120.31564.victor@vmpbg.com> Subject: Re: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:39:18 -0000 > This is one of the things I find really hard to get Windows users to > understand. They just won't believe that a company like Microsoft would > still be using a filesystem that needs defragmenting if it were possible > to design one that didn't. I often wonder why myself - after all, they > must have put a fair amount of work into NTFS, which at least doesn't > seem to get corrupted in a power failure. Did they make a trade-off I > don't understand, or is it just incompetence - or worse, a deal with > disk manufacturers to sell more disk? Why is it unnecessary to defragment UFS? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 11:44:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788A916A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:44:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23BC843D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:44:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend3.messagingengine.com (frontend3.internal [10.202.2.152]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74094CC5280 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:44:01 -0400 (EDT) X-Sasl-enc: DmGZCXfgyvXLXy46mCOl/mJH/FdhrGamIiZX8jzKVYt3 1122551041 Received: from gumby.localdomain (dsl-80-41-76-128.access.as9105.com [80.41.76.128]) by frontend3.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09AD51E9 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:44:00 -0400 (EDT) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:43:56 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <48a5f32a05060723581c7caf4b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <48a5f32a05060723581c7caf4b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507281243.56918.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: Power cut during portupgrade -NRP kde X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:44:03 -0000 On Wednesday 08 June 2005 07:58, Gareth Bailey wrote: > Hi all, > > I believe that a kde install using packages where possible is the quickest > route. I started the kde install using "portupgrade -NRP kde", but had a > power cut half way through :-( How might i continue where I left off? Just run it again. BTW the -P option wont buy you much unless you are using one of the fruitsalad servers (see freebsd.kde.org) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 08:27:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF6A16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:27:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from razvanro@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay16-dav7.bay16.hotmail.com [65.54.186.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4AA43D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:27:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from razvanro@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:27:07 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 82.208.140.23 by BAY16-DAV7.phx.gbl with DAV; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:27:07 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [82.208.140.23] X-Originating-Email: [razvanro@hotmail.com] X-Sender: razvanro@hotmail.com From: "Razvan" To: Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:26:10 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4927.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4927.1200 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2005 08:27:07.0967 (UTC) FILETIME=[2489CCF0:01C5934E] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:34:24 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:27:08 -0000 Hi, What version of FreeBSD is indicat for my server ? I have: MB: X5DA8 - = Supermicro dual XEON 2.40 GHz ( = http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon/E7505/X5DA8.cfm ) , = with AIC-7902, 4xHDD SEAGATE 36G SCSI, 512DDRAM, video ATI RADEON9550. I = use for server www, ftp, mail, router. Thx, Razvan Obreja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 10:37:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561FB16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:37:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jackqqpro@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE99643D53 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:37:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jackqqpro@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so619092rne for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:37:15 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Vf7SHVhxP3YlvJUgfaUFBN3wk52owcRQDmVs0sMSnDSEZ6r5D6ZNbOAJWagapBEJESWsQFef5vLlLlmP0RAobcanIouf12ZZuI1QzEv99nZZyk5wNXJtkVTuLV8W6EZrdOr9p49Ljq8/erRDF64BOTgAFCeGiMP/Rh8PvW83Xjk= Received: by 10.39.2.12 with SMTP id e12mr1129357rni; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:37:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.104.31 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <890a507f0507280337493e62cf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:37:14 +0800 From: Qiu Quan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200507252251.56256.danny@ricin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <890a507f05072509526407a4df@mail.gmail.com> <8qoe8q2433.e8q@mail.opusnet.com> <200507252251.56256.danny@ricin.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:34:24 +0000 Cc: Danny Pansters , "Gary W. Swearingen" , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Problem report rejected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Qiu Quan List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:37:16 -0000 Thanks to all who helped! I went to the web form at http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html, but didn't find an appropriate place to attach some file. Then, I noticed that the GMail's web interface tried to expand tabs to spaces when forwarding my original message, which was unacceptable. Finally, I "had a go at ssmtp". It supports TLS. Great! So I 'cat' that PR message into stdin for ssmtp to deliver through GMail smtp service. And, everything done! :-) On 7/26/05, Danny Pansters wrote: > On Monday 25 July 2005 19:22, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: >=20 > ... handle[s][d] tabs wrongly resulting in a PR with an > incorrect Makefile... the fun never ends. The web form is not tab safe > either, last time I tried (most certainly the same cause). >=20 > I've found a resonable solution for this in the ssmtp port. > --=20 Regards, Qiu Quan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 12:41:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33AEF16A420 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:41:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jwm@sentinelchicken.net) Received: from eastrmmtai07.cox.net (eastrmmtai07.cox.net [68.230.240.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD42043D49 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:40:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jwm@sentinelchicken.net) Received: from sentinelchicken.net ([68.226.91.117]) by centrmmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with SMTP id <20050728010525.SPMX4773.centrmmtao01.cox.net@sentinelchicken.net> for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:05:25 -0400 Received: (qmail 82778 invoked by uid 1000); 28 Jul 2005 01:15:44 -0000 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:15:43 -0400 From: Jason Morgan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050728011543.GA81114@sentinelchicken.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Boot page fault - alternative kernel needed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:41:01 -0000 I have an old laptop that I am finally trying to get FreeBSD installed on. It was recently running Linux just fine, but I am having a tough time getting FreeBSD installed on it. Here is the error I get when booting. I have typed all that is visible on the screen when it crashes. # Begin isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x3000-0x300f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x 3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 1.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 uhci0: at device 1.2 on pci0 Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0xeb97b fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc00eb87c stack pointer = 0x10:0xc10209f0 frame pointer = 0x10:0xc10209f0 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 0 (swapper) trap number = 12 panic: page fault # End So, my question is: Is this the UHCI driver failing to load (happens at this same point every time I try to boot it)? Is there any way around this? Possible using a trimmed down kernel to boot? Any suggestions? Thanks in advance, Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 12:41:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E79F16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:41:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jwm@sentinelchicken.net) Received: from eastrmmtai07.cox.net (eastrmmtai07.cox.net [68.230.240.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6809443D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:41:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jwm@sentinelchicken.net) Received: from sentinelchicken.net ([68.226.91.117]) by centrmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with SMTP id <20050728120034.UWFL19684.centrmmtao05.cox.net@sentinelchicken.net> for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:00:34 -0400 Received: (qmail 71617 invoked by uid 1000); 28 Jul 2005 12:10:54 -0000 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:10:54 -0400 From: Jason Morgan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050728121054.GB39925@sentinelchicken.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: make buildworld error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:41:03 -0000 I keep getting the following on a 4.9 system when trying to move to 4.11. rm -f sa main.o pdb.o usrdb.o sa.8.gz sa.8.cat.gz rm -f .depend GPATH GRTAGS GSYMS GTAGS ===> usr.sbin/setkey ".depend", line 1: Need an operator ".depend", line 2: Need an operator ".depend", line 3: Need an operator ".depend", line 4: Need an operator ".depend", line 6: Need an operator ".depend", line 7: Need an operator ".depend", line 8: Need an operator ".depend", line 9: Need an operator ".depend", line 10: Need an operator ".depend", line 11: Need an operator ".depend", line 12: Need an operator ".depend", line 13: Need an operator ".depend", line 14: Need an operator ".depend", line 15: Need an operator ".depend", line 16: Need an operator ".depend", line 17: Need an operator ".depend", line 18: Need an operator ".depend", line 19: Need an operator ".depend", line 20: Need an operator ".depend", line 21: Need an operator ".depend", line 22: Need an operator make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue Anyone offer some advice? I've tried updating my source again - I even went as far as nuking my /usr/src directory and re-fetching it. Thanks, Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 12:48:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 802DE16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:48:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cholland@redmoonbroadband.com) Received: from exchange.redmoonbroadband.com (exchange.redmoonbroadband.com [206.123.80.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD73143D48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:48:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cholland@redmoonbroadband.com) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:47:34 -0500 Message-ID: <4B3EE484EEA4F344BBB62F831648998637C8BB@corpsrv.RedMoon.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Port Scan Thread-Index: AcWTclEHXTJhJ3b2QzK6KvPQ+8PfIQ== From: "Cody Holland" To: Subject: Port Scan X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:48:49 -0000 Does anyone know what could be causing this? Some of these are probes from external IP's, but a lot of these are the servers probing itself. > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1026 from=20 > 218.66.104.140:38828 Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1027=20 > from 218.66.104.140:38828 Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:137 > from 61.231.179.224:1026 Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:137=20 > from 201.26.75.232:1031 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from=20 > 127.0.0.1:55955 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:63129 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123=20 > from 127.0.0.1:56993 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from=20 > 127.0.0.1:56993 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from=20 > 127.0.0.1:64144 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:64144 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:64144 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:64144 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:64144 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:64144 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:64144 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:64144 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:64144 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:51848 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:55282 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123=20 > from 127.0.0.1:53426 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from=20 > 127.0.0.1:53426 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from=20 > 127.0.0.1:64592 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:64592 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:64592 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:64592 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:64592 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:64592 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:64592 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:64592 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:64592 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP=20 > 206.123.80.170:1026 from 221.10.201.190:44654 Connection attempt to=20 > TCP 206.123.80.170:135 from 206.123.215.83:28963 flags:0x02 Connection > attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:135 from 206.123.215.83:28963 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58536 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:57678 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:55382=20 > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:55382=20 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51988 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51988 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51988 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51988 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51988 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51988 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51988 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51988 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51988 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1026 from 220.175.8.154:38035 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55080 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:57468 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:62552=20 > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:62552=20 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49701 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49701 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49701 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49701 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49701 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49701 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49701 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49701 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49701 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1026 from=20 > 221.10.201.190:45214 Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1027=20 > from 221.10.201.190:45214 Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:137 > from 162.84.57.153:50821 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from=20 > 127.0.0.1:51070 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:57270 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123=20 > from 127.0.0.1:49270 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from=20 > 127.0.0.1:49270 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from=20 > 127.0.0.1:57134 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:57134 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:57134 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:57134 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:57134 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:57134 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:57134 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:57134 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:57134 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP=20 > 206.123.80.170:1434 from 221.202.129.164:1196 Connection attempt to=20 > UDP 206.123.80.170:1027 from 216.67.231.137:33281 Connection attempt=20 > to UDP 206.123.80.170:137 from 206.113.176.131:1038 Connection attempt > to UDP 206.123.80.170:137 from 200.233.227.54:1027 Connection attempt=20 > to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:52965 flags:0x02 Connection attempt > to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64315 flags:0x02 Connection attempt > to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:55479 Connection attempt to UDP=20 > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:55479 Connection attempt to TCP=20 > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59405 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59405 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59405 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59405 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59405 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59405 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59405 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59405 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59405 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > 206.123.80.170:137 from 148.221.231.83:1029 Connection attempt to TCP=20 > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:61306 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:53905 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:53157 Connection attempt to UDP=20 > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:53157 Connection attempt to TCP=20 > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:53457 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:53457 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:53457 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:53457 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:53457 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:53457 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:53457 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:53457 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > 206.123.80.170:1434 from 68.254.205.210:1293 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:53457 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 206.123.80.170:4899 from 211.47.128.143:3494 flags:0x02 Connection=20 > attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:137 from 67.78.166.190:1096 Connection=20 > attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1027 from 218.66.104.140:37456=20 > Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1026 from=20 > 218.66.104.140:37456 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from=20 > 127.0.0.1:65387 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:56212 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123=20 > from 127.0.0.1:51896 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from=20 > 127.0.0.1:51896 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from=20 > 127.0.0.1:50588 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:50588 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:50588 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:50588 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:50588 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:50588 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:50588 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:50588 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:50588 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP=20 > 206.123.80.170:1027 from 216.67.231.137:33313 Connection attempt to=20 > TCP 206.123.80.170:1433 from 210.82.89.208:2393 flags:0x02 Connection=20 > attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:1433 from 210.82.89.208:2393 flags:0x02=20 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51422 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51555 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:54217=20 > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:54217=20 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54552 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54552 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54552 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54552 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54552 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54552 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54552 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54552 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54552 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:57131 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65235 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:55115=20 > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:55115=20 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62085 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62085 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62085 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62085 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62085 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62085 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62085 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62085 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62085 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1027 from 70.85.176.210:32939 > Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1026 from 70.85.176.210:32939 > Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1027 from=20 > 221.10.201.190:48062 Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1026=20 > from 221.10.201.190:48062 Connection attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:139 > from 66.202.43.195:23691 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP=20 > 206.123.80.170:139 from 66.202.43.195:23691 flags:0x02 Connection=20 > attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:139 from 66.202.43.195:23691 flags:0x02=20 > Connection attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:445 from 66.202.43.195:25018=20 > flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:445 from=20 > 66.202.43.195:25018 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP=20 > 206.123.80.170:445 from 66.202.43.195:25018 flags:0x02 Connection=20 > attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64696 flags:0x02 Connection > attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51971 flags:0x02 Connection > attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:64470 Connection attempt=20 > to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:64470 Connection attempt to TCP=20 > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55753 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55753 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55753 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55753 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55753 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55753 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55753 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55753 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55753 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > 206.123.80.170:1027 from 216.67.231.137:33346 Connection attempt to=20 > TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65144 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to > TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55984 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to > UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:49967 Connection attempt to UDP=20 > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:49967 Connection attempt to TCP=20 > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60508 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60508 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60508 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60508 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60508 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60508 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60508 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60508 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60508 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 206.123.80.170:25 from 61.31.134.117:4998 flags:0x02 Connection=20 > attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:25 from 61.31.134.117:4998 flags:0x02=20 > Connection attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:25 from 61.31.134.117:4998=20 > flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50700 > flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59252 > flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from=20 > 127.0.0.1:61448 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from=20 > 127.0.0.1:61448 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from=20 > 127.0.0.1:55124 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:55124 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:55124 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:55124 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:55124 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:55124 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:55124 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:55124 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:55124 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP=20 > 206.123.80.170:1434 from 60.18.168.25:1030 Connection attempt to TCP=20 > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58475 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58505 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:58678 Connection attempt to UDP=20 > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:58678 Connection attempt to TCP=20 > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51200 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51200 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51200 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51200 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51200 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51200 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51200 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51200 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51200 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > 206.123.80.170:137 from 218.172.106.84:1027 Connection attempt to UDP=20 > 192.168.253.32:56341 from 192.168.253.2:161 Connection attempt to UDP=20 > 206.123.80.170:1434 from 61.175.207.38:3170 Connection attempt to UDP=20 > 206.123.80.170:1434 from 219.159.73.220:1058 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50813 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62543 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:61879 Connection attempt to UDP=20 > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:61879 Connection attempt to TCP=20 > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58516 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58516 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58516 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58516 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58516 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58516 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58516 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58516 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58516 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > 206.123.80.170:1026 from 218.66.104.140:34830 Connection attempt to=20 > UDP 206.123.80.170:1027 from 218.66.104.140:34830 Connection attempt=20 > to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62416 flags:0x02 Connection attempt > to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50300 flags:0x02 Connection attempt > to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:58013 Connection attempt to UDP=20 > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:58013 Connection attempt to TCP=20 > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62138 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62138 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62138 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62138 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62138 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62138 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62138 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62138 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62138 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > 206.123.80.170:1026 from 221.10.201.190:51892 Connection attempt to=20 > UDP 206.123.80.170:1027 from 221.10.201.190:51892 Connection attempt=20 > to UDP 206.123.80.170:137 from 211.22.169.123:1029 Connection attempt=20 > to UDP 206.123.80.170:1434 from 60.179.148.160:1937 Connection attempt > to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59963 flags:0x02 Connection attempt > to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:52306 flags:0x02 Connection attempt > to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:63406 Connection attempt to UDP=20 > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:63406 Connection attempt to TCP=20 > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64991 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64991 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64991 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64991 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64991 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64991 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64991 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64991 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64991 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55443 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50721 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:54942 Connection attempt to UDP=20 > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:54942 Connection attempt to TCP=20 > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62712 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62712 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62712 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62712 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62712 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62712 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62712 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62712 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62712 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49917 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:63752 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:63807 Connection attempt to UDP=20 > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:63807 Connection attempt to TCP=20 > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54096 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54096 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54096 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54096 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54096 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54096 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54096 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54096 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54096 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 206.123.80.170:139 from 206.228.205.129:3165 flags:0x02 Connection=20 > attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:139 from 206.228.205.129:3165 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55585 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60823 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:64022=20 > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:64022=20 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58708 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58708 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58708 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58708 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58708 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58708 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58708 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58708 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58708 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:137 from 61.37.166.72:1477=20 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:52235 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59234 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:60251=20 > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:60251=20 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60291 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60291 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60291 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60291 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60291 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60291 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60291 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60291 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60291 flags:0x02 > Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1026 from=20 > 216.67.231.137:33473 Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:137 from > 200.68.226.150:1026 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from=20 > 127.0.0.1:52880 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:54657 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123=20 > from 127.0.0.1:61743 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from=20 > 127.0.0.1:61743 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from=20 > 127.0.0.1:62078 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:62078 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:62078 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:62078 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:62078 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:62078 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:62078 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:62078 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:62078 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP=20 > 206.123.80.170:137 from 219.160.225.172:61553 Connection attempt to=20 > TCP 206.123.80.170:1080 from 202.73.247.160:4187 flags:0x02 Connection > attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1027 from 218.66.104.140:35566=20 > Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1434 from 219.136.44.73:3034=20 > Connection attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:135 from 81.182.54.227:4553=20 > flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1434 from=20 > 202.101.70.43:3013 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from=20 > 127.0.0.1:57530 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:59490 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123=20 > from 127.0.0.1:51191 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from=20 > 127.0.0.1:51191 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from=20 > 127.0.0.1:56484 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:56484 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:56484 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:56484 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:56484 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:56484 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:56484 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:56484 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > 127.0.0.1:56484 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP=20 > 206.123.80.170:1434 from 61.185.24.67:1101 Connection attempt to UDP=20 > 206.123.80.170:1434 from 202.96.89.45:1416 Connection attempt to TCP=20 > 206.123.80.170:15118 from 217.116.136.42:3908 flags:0x02 Connection=20 > attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:15118 from 217.116.136.42:3908=20 > flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:445 from=20 > 217.116.136.42:4423 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP=20 > 206.123.80.170:445 from 217.116.136.42:4423 flags:0x02 Connection=20 > attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1434 from 202.97.174.226:1038 Connection > attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60151 flags:0x02 Connection > attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55783 flags:0x02 Connection > attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:53008 Connection attempt=20 > to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:53008 Connection attempt to TCP=20 > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50111 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50111 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50111 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50111 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50111 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50111 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50111 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50111 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50111 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > 206.123.80.170:137 from 83.235.253.167:10018 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64106 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62577 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:60805 Connection attempt to UDP=20 > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:60805 Connection attempt to TCP=20 > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:63600 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:63600 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:63600 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:63600 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:63600 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:63600 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:63600 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:63600 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:63600 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > 206.123.80.170:137 from 67.68.138.222:61631 Connection attempt to TCP=20 > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58875 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51079 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:59719 Connection attempt to UDP=20 > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:59719 Connection attempt to TCP=20 > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50912 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50912 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50912 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50912 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50912 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50912 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50912 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50912 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50912 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > 206.123.80.170:137 from 222.213.93.106:1034 Connection attempt to TCP=20 > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49637 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64161 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:62528 Connection attempt to UDP=20 > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:62528 Connection attempt to TCP=20 > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:61587 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:61587 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:61587 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:61587 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:61587 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:61587 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:61587 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:61587 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:61587 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 206.123.80.170:1433 from 84.131.177.47:21938 flags:0x02 Connection=20 > attempt to UDP 192.168.253.32:64807 from 192.168.253.2:161 Connection=20 > attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1027 from 220.175.8.154:33972 Connection > attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:63194 flags:0x02 Connection > attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:53348 flags:0x02 Connection > attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:50654 Connection attempt=20 > to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:50654 Connection attempt to TCP=20 > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49386 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49386 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49386 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49386 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49386 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49386 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49386 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49386 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49386 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > 206.123.80.170:137 from 82.104.59.45:1027 Cody Holland Network Engineer Redmoon Broadband, Inc. 972-599-3900x26 cholland@redmoonbroadband.com ****************************************** The information contained in, or attached to, this e-mail, may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed and may be subject to legal privilege. If you have received this e-mail in error you should notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail, delete the message from your system and notify your system manager. Please do not copy it for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. The views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused, directly or indirectly, by any virus transmitted in this email. ******************************************=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 13:01:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8682316A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:01:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from server.absolute-media.de (server.absolute-media.de [213.239.231.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D633C43D49 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:01:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D5A8CA7C; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:01:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.absolute-media.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15524-04; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:01:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firewall.demig (p50839673.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.131.150.115]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A69BA8CA04; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:01:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ws-ew-3 (ws-ew-3.w2kdemig [192.168.1.72]) by firewall.demig (8.13.4/8.13.1) with SMTP id j6SCuR2S090344; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:56:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) From: "Norbert Koch" To: "Jason Morgan" , Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:56:26 +0200 Message-ID: <000c01c59373$c3bd1c80$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <20050728121054.GB39925@sentinelchicken.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at absolute-media.de Cc: Subject: RE: make buildworld error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:01:38 -0000 > I keep getting the following on a 4.9 system when trying to move to > 4.11. > > rm -f sa main.o pdb.o usrdb.o sa.8.gz sa.8.cat.gz > rm -f .depend GPATH GRTAGS GSYMS GTAGS > ===> usr.sbin/setkey > ".depend", line 1: Need an operator > ".depend", line 2: Need an operator > ".depend", line 3: Need an operator > ".depend", line 4: Need an operator > ".depend", line 6: Need an operator > ".depend", line 7: Need an operator > ".depend", line 8: Need an operator > ".depend", line 9: Need an operator > ".depend", line 10: Need an operator > ".depend", line 11: Need an operator > ".depend", line 12: Need an operator > ".depend", line 13: Need an operator > ".depend", line 14: Need an operator > ".depend", line 15: Need an operator > ".depend", line 16: Need an operator > ".depend", line 17: Need an operator > ".depend", line 18: Need an operator > ".depend", line 19: Need an operator > ".depend", line 20: Need an operator > ".depend", line 21: Need an operator > ".depend", line 22: Need an operator > make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue > > Anyone offer some advice? I've tried updating my source again - I even > went as far as nuking my /usr/src directory and re-fetching it. Are you trying to use gmake instead of the original bsd make? 'make -v' should give you 'make: no target to make' If you use gmake, you see something like GNU Make 3.80 Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Norbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 13:06:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8589316A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:06:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hornetmadness@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E5543D49 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:05:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hornetmadness@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 34so104428rns for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:05:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nz8daGtJbWtEvjB3g7qvoIHLK9tW3jRR0pbZAwVEwWu+K6j3kB8tCzMLh9aBQ48CBMveXj63fIC1JG8EoGOLE8TxrVHBh6tPKmir4p+PEBca7fQ0GfW+ksCVhNF8CvyqPkaK0LE+Dh0MSJi15LDwHJFrJ2PSOsTmoN+FFRjAiog= Received: by 10.38.8.47 with SMTP id 47mr62133rnh; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:05:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.8.23 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:05:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:05:31 -0400 From: Hornet To: Cody Holland In-Reply-To: <4B3EE484EEA4F344BBB62F831648998637C8BB@corpsrv.RedMoon.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4B3EE484EEA4F344BBB62F831648998637C8BB@corpsrv.RedMoon.local> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port Scan X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Hornet List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:06:02 -0000 On 7/28/05, Cody Holland wrote: > Does anyone know what could be causing this? Some of these are probes > from external IP's, but a lot of these are the servers probing itself. >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1026 from > > 218.66.104.140:38828 Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1027 > > from 218.66.104.140:38828 Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:137 >=20 > > from 61.231.179.224:1026 Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:137 > > from 201.26.75.232:1031 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > > 127.0.0.1:55955 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:63129 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 > > from 127.0.0.1:56993 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from > > 127.0.0.1:56993 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > > 127.0.0.1:64144 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:64144 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:64144 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:64144 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:64144 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:64144 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:64144 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:64144 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:64144 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:51848 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:55282 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 > > from 127.0.0.1:53426 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from > > 127.0.0.1:53426 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > > 127.0.0.1:64592 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:64592 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:64592 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:64592 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:64592 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:64592 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:64592 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:64592 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:64592 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > > 206.123.80.170:1026 from 221.10.201.190:44654 Connection attempt to > > TCP 206.123.80.170:135 from 206.123.215.83:28963 flags:0x02 Connection >=20 > > attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:135 from 206.123.215.83:28963 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58536 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:57678 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:55382 > > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:55382 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51988 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51988 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51988 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51988 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51988 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51988 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51988 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51988 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51988 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1026 from 220.175.8.154:38035 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55080 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:57468 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:62552 > > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:62552 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49701 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49701 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49701 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49701 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49701 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49701 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49701 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49701 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49701 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1026 from > > 221.10.201.190:45214 Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1027 > > from 221.10.201.190:45214 Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:137 >=20 > > from 162.84.57.153:50821 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > > 127.0.0.1:51070 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:57270 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 > > from 127.0.0.1:49270 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from > > 127.0.0.1:49270 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > > 127.0.0.1:57134 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:57134 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:57134 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:57134 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:57134 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:57134 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:57134 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:57134 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:57134 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > > 206.123.80.170:1434 from 221.202.129.164:1196 Connection attempt to > > UDP 206.123.80.170:1027 from 216.67.231.137:33281 Connection attempt > > to UDP 206.123.80.170:137 from 206.113.176.131:1038 Connection attempt >=20 > > to UDP 206.123.80.170:137 from 200.233.227.54:1027 Connection attempt > > to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:52965 flags:0x02 Connection attempt >=20 > > to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64315 flags:0x02 Connection attempt >=20 > > to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:55479 Connection attempt to UDP > > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:55479 Connection attempt to TCP > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59405 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59405 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59405 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59405 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59405 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59405 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59405 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59405 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59405 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP >=20 > > 206.123.80.170:137 from 148.221.231.83:1029 Connection attempt to TCP > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:61306 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:53905 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:53157 Connection attempt to UDP > > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:53157 Connection attempt to TCP > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:53457 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:53457 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:53457 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:53457 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:53457 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:53457 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:53457 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:53457 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP >=20 > > 206.123.80.170:1434 from 68.254.205.210:1293 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:53457 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 206.123.80.170:4899 from 211.47.128.143:3494 flags:0x02 Connection > > attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:137 from 67.78.166.190:1096 Connection > > attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1027 from 218.66.104.140:37456 > > Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1026 from > > 218.66.104.140:37456 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > > 127.0.0.1:65387 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:56212 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 > > from 127.0.0.1:51896 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from > > 127.0.0.1:51896 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > > 127.0.0.1:50588 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:50588 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:50588 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:50588 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:50588 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:50588 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:50588 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:50588 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:50588 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > > 206.123.80.170:1027 from 216.67.231.137:33313 Connection attempt to > > TCP 206.123.80.170:1433 from 210.82.89.208:2393 flags:0x02 Connection > > attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:1433 from 210.82.89.208:2393 flags:0x02 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51422 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51555 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:54217 > > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:54217 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54552 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54552 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54552 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54552 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54552 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54552 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54552 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54552 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54552 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:57131 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65235 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:55115 > > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:55115 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62085 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62085 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62085 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62085 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62085 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62085 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62085 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62085 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62085 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1027 from 70.85.176.210:32939 >=20 > > Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1026 from 70.85.176.210:32939 >=20 > > Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1027 from > > 221.10.201.190:48062 Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1026 > > from 221.10.201.190:48062 Connection attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:139 >=20 > > from 66.202.43.195:23691 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > > 206.123.80.170:139 from 66.202.43.195:23691 flags:0x02 Connection > > attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:139 from 66.202.43.195:23691 flags:0x02 > > Connection attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:445 from 66.202.43.195:25018 > > flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:445 from > > 66.202.43.195:25018 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > > 206.123.80.170:445 from 66.202.43.195:25018 flags:0x02 Connection > > attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64696 flags:0x02 Connection >=20 > > attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51971 flags:0x02 Connection >=20 > > attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:64470 Connection attempt > > to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:64470 Connection attempt to TCP > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55753 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55753 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55753 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55753 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55753 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55753 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55753 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55753 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55753 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP >=20 > > 206.123.80.170:1027 from 216.67.231.137:33346 Connection attempt to > > TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65144 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to >=20 > > TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55984 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to >=20 > > UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:49967 Connection attempt to UDP > > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:49967 Connection attempt to TCP > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60508 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60508 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60508 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60508 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60508 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60508 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60508 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60508 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60508 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 206.123.80.170:25 from 61.31.134.117:4998 flags:0x02 Connection > > attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:25 from 61.31.134.117:4998 flags:0x02 > > Connection attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:25 from 61.31.134.117:4998 > > flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50700 >=20 > > flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59252 >=20 > > flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from > > 127.0.0.1:61448 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from > > 127.0.0.1:61448 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > > 127.0.0.1:55124 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:55124 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:55124 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:55124 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:55124 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:55124 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:55124 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:55124 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:55124 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > > 206.123.80.170:1434 from 60.18.168.25:1030 Connection attempt to TCP > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58475 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58505 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:58678 Connection attempt to UDP > > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:58678 Connection attempt to TCP > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51200 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51200 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51200 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51200 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51200 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51200 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51200 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51200 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51200 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP >=20 > > 206.123.80.170:137 from 218.172.106.84:1027 Connection attempt to UDP > > 192.168.253.32:56341 from 192.168.253.2:161 Connection attempt to UDP > > 206.123.80.170:1434 from 61.175.207.38:3170 Connection attempt to UDP > > 206.123.80.170:1434 from 219.159.73.220:1058 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50813 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62543 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:61879 Connection attempt to UDP > > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:61879 Connection attempt to TCP > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58516 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58516 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58516 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58516 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58516 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58516 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58516 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58516 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58516 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP >=20 > > 206.123.80.170:1026 from 218.66.104.140:34830 Connection attempt to > > UDP 206.123.80.170:1027 from 218.66.104.140:34830 Connection attempt > > to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62416 flags:0x02 Connection attempt >=20 > > to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50300 flags:0x02 Connection attempt >=20 > > to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:58013 Connection attempt to UDP > > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:58013 Connection attempt to TCP > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62138 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62138 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62138 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62138 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62138 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62138 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62138 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62138 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62138 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP >=20 > > 206.123.80.170:1026 from 221.10.201.190:51892 Connection attempt to > > UDP 206.123.80.170:1027 from 221.10.201.190:51892 Connection attempt > > to UDP 206.123.80.170:137 from 211.22.169.123:1029 Connection attempt > > to UDP 206.123.80.170:1434 from 60.179.148.160:1937 Connection attempt >=20 > > to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59963 flags:0x02 Connection attempt >=20 > > to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:52306 flags:0x02 Connection attempt >=20 > > to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:63406 Connection attempt to UDP > > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:63406 Connection attempt to TCP > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64991 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64991 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64991 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64991 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64991 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64991 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64991 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64991 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64991 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55443 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50721 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:54942 Connection attempt to UDP > > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:54942 Connection attempt to TCP > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62712 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62712 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62712 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62712 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62712 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62712 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62712 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62712 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62712 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49917 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:63752 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:63807 Connection attempt to UDP > > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:63807 Connection attempt to TCP > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54096 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54096 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54096 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54096 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54096 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54096 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54096 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54096 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:54096 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 206.123.80.170:139 from 206.228.205.129:3165 flags:0x02 Connection > > attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:139 from 206.228.205.129:3165 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55585 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60823 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:64022 > > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:64022 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58708 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58708 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58708 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58708 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58708 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58708 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58708 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58708 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58708 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:137 from 61.37.166.72:1477 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:52235 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:59234 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:60251 > > Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:60251 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60291 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60291 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60291 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60291 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60291 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60291 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60291 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60291 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60291 flags:0x02 >=20 > > Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1026 from > > 216.67.231.137:33473 Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:137 from >=20 > > 200.68.226.150:1026 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > > 127.0.0.1:52880 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:54657 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 > > from 127.0.0.1:61743 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from > > 127.0.0.1:61743 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > > 127.0.0.1:62078 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:62078 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:62078 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:62078 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:62078 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:62078 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:62078 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:62078 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:62078 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > > 206.123.80.170:137 from 219.160.225.172:61553 Connection attempt to > > TCP 206.123.80.170:1080 from 202.73.247.160:4187 flags:0x02 Connection >=20 > > attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1027 from 218.66.104.140:35566 > > Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1434 from 219.136.44.73:3034 > > Connection attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:135 from 81.182.54.227:4553 > > flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1434 from > > 202.101.70.43:3013 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > > 127.0.0.1:57530 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:59490 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 > > from 127.0.0.1:51191 Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from > > 127.0.0.1:51191 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from > > 127.0.0.1:56484 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:56484 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:56484 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:56484 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:56484 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:56484 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:56484 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:56484 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:56484 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP > > 206.123.80.170:1434 from 61.185.24.67:1101 Connection attempt to UDP > > 206.123.80.170:1434 from 202.96.89.45:1416 Connection attempt to TCP > > 206.123.80.170:15118 from 217.116.136.42:3908 flags:0x02 Connection > > attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:15118 from 217.116.136.42:3908 > > flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP 206.123.80.170:445 from > > 217.116.136.42:4423 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP > > 206.123.80.170:445 from 217.116.136.42:4423 flags:0x02 Connection > > attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1434 from 202.97.174.226:1038 Connection >=20 > > attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:60151 flags:0x02 Connection >=20 > > attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:55783 flags:0x02 Connection >=20 > > attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:53008 Connection attempt > > to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:53008 Connection attempt to TCP > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50111 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50111 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50111 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50111 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50111 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50111 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50111 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50111 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50111 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP >=20 > > 206.123.80.170:137 from 83.235.253.167:10018 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64106 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:62577 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:60805 Connection attempt to UDP > > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:60805 Connection attempt to TCP > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:63600 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:63600 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:63600 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:63600 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:63600 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:63600 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:63600 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:63600 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:63600 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP >=20 > > 206.123.80.170:137 from 67.68.138.222:61631 Connection attempt to TCP > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:58875 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:51079 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:59719 Connection attempt to UDP > > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:59719 Connection attempt to TCP > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50912 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50912 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50912 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50912 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50912 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50912 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50912 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50912 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:50912 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP >=20 > > 206.123.80.170:137 from 222.213.93.106:1034 Connection attempt to TCP > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49637 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:64161 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:62528 Connection attempt to UDP > > 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:62528 Connection attempt to TCP > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:61587 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:61587 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:61587 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:61587 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:61587 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:61587 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:61587 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:61587 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:61587 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 206.123.80.170:1433 from 84.131.177.47:21938 flags:0x02 Connection > > attempt to UDP 192.168.253.32:64807 from 192.168.253.2:161 Connection > > attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1027 from 220.175.8.154:33972 Connection >=20 > > attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:63194 flags:0x02 Connection >=20 > > attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:53348 flags:0x02 Connection >=20 > > attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:50654 Connection attempt > > to UDP 127.0.0.1:123 from 127.0.0.1:50654 Connection attempt to TCP > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49386 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49386 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49386 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49386 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49386 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49386 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49386 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49386 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to TCP >=20 > > 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:49386 flags:0x02 Connection attempt to UDP >=20 > > 206.123.80.170:137 from 82.104.59.45:1027 >=20 > Cody Holland > Network Engineer > Redmoon Broadband, Inc. > 972-599-3900x26 > cholland@redmoonbroadband.com > ****************************************** > The information contained in, or attached to, this e-mail, may contain > confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the > individual or entity to whom they are addressed and may be subject to > legal privilege. If you have received this e-mail in error you should > notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail, delete the message from > your system and notify your system manager. Please do not copy it for > any purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. The views or > opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do > not necessarily represent those of the company. The recipient should > check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The > company accepts no liability for any damage caused, directly or > indirectly, by any virus transmitted in this email. > ****************************************** > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" >=20 At first glance, I would think that the 127.0.0.1:80 might be a service monitoring tool that is running. It didn't see any time stamps, so I'm not sure of the frequency of probes. It could be a user up to no good or your box has been zombiefied. The external IP attempts, I would not be to worried about as it is only a few attempts and should be expected on a public box. Look at your /var/log/messages for cron changes/additions, sudo or root logins, and any weirdness. Check /var/log/auth.log for users that have logged in around the time these started to happen. Also don't forget to check your archive logs if you run logrotation. Also a rootcheck app might be a good idea. Is your box up2date on patches? -Erik- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 13:16:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3652016A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:16:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from server.absolute-media.de (server.absolute-media.de [213.239.231.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D8743D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:16:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6AEB8C42F; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:16:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.absolute-media.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16125-06; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:16:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firewall.demig (p50839673.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.131.150.115]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0157B89C8C; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:16:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ws-ew-3 (ws-ew-3.w2kdemig [192.168.1.72]) by firewall.demig (8.13.4/8.13.1) with SMTP id j6SDFAc3091309; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:15:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) From: "Norbert Koch" To: "Cody Holland" , Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:15:08 +0200 Message-ID: <000001c59376$609db760$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0 In-Reply-To: <4B3EE484EEA4F344BBB62F831648998637C8BB@corpsrv.RedMoon.local> Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at absolute-media.de Cc: Subject: RE: Port Scan X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:16:37 -0000 > Does anyone know what could be causing this? Some of these are probes > from external IP's, but a lot of these are the servers probing itself. > > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 > > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 > > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 > > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 > > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 > > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 > > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 > > > Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:80 from 127.0.0.1:65215 flags:0x02 > squid http proxy? > > Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1026 from > > 218.66.104.140:38828 Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:1027 > > from 218.66.104.140:38828 Connection attempt to UDP 206.123.80.170:137 netbios-ns request to a samba server? Norbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 13:21:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E414816A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:21:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from the.lists@mgm51.com) Received: from oneyou.mcmli.com (oneyou.mcmli.com [216.194.67.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E69043D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:21:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from the.lists@mgm51.com) Received: from sentry.24cl.com (pcp01267574pcs.danbry01.ct.comcast.net [68.63.157.203]) by oneyou.mcmli.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8915B86 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:21:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from XPMM (unknown [63.119.50.193]) by sentry.24cl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0BE50ED for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:21:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <200507280921200938.03BF29A7@sentry.24cl.com> In-Reply-To: <1122507010.1281.7.camel@chaucer> References: <000001c592a1$ef621660$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> <1122507010.1281.7.camel@chaucer> X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.00.1081 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (P) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:21:20 -0400 From: "MikeM" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: RE: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:21:13 -0000 On 7/27/2005 at 7:30 PM Mike Jeays wrote: |This is one of the things I find really hard to get Windows users to |understand. They just won't believe that a company like Microsoft would |still be using a filesystem that needs defragmenting if it were possible |to design one that didn't. I often wonder why myself - after all, they |must have put a fair amount of work into NTFS, which at least doesn't |seem to get corrupted in a power failure. Did they make a trade-off I |don't understand, or is it just incompetence - or worse, a deal with |disk manufacturers to sell more disk? ============= When NTFS was new, Microsoft was saying that it did not need to be defragmented, ever. I attended two technical sessions at conferences where Microsoft actually stated that. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 13:36:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1691516A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:36:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marius@korsmo.org) Received: from elwolfie.com (elwolfie.com [195.204.13.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A181643D5C for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:36:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marius@korsmo.org) Received: from localhost (elwolfie.com [127.0.0.1]) by elwolfie.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC045A for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:36:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elwolfie.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (elwolfie.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15547-05 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:36:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by elwolfie.com (Postfix, from userid 33) id 730E75B; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:36:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mp-117-185.daxnet.no (mp-117-185.daxnet.no [193.216.117.185]) by elwolfie.com (Horde MIME library) with HTTP for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:36:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20050728153603.ziaoeppp5s2s44g8@elwolfie.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:36:03 +0200 From: Marius Korsmo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050728031706.fsbcd03hh4lcsg8g@elwolfie.com> <42E89EA9.7000508@dial.pipex.com> In-Reply-To: <42E89EA9.7000508@dial.pipex.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.3) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elwolfie.com Subject: Re: make buildworld fails in openssl/colldef [SOLVED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:36:09 -0000 Quoting Alex Zbyslaw : > Marius Korsmo wrote: > >> It took two weeks to fix this problem, and therefore I do have a few >> questions. >> >> The error turned out to be in err.h. The file located in /usr/include was >> totally different from the one located in /usr/src/include. >> >> < /*- >> < * Copyright (c) 1993 >> < *The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. >> --- >> >>> /* crypto/err/err.h */ >>> /* Copyright (C) 1995-1998 Eric Young (eay@cryptsoft.com) >>> * All rights reserved. >>> >> >> You can see the entire diff at http://pastebin.com/322918 >> >> My question is: I deleted /usr/src, and I cvsup'ed everything. When >> I do a make >> buildworld, why does not the new err.h get copied from /usr/src/include to >> /usr/include? This would have solved my problem two weeks ago :) >> > build = recompile things > install = put them where they belong in the filesystem > > buildworld doesn't install the file because it's not supposed to. > >> Does err.h get copied only when you do a make installworld? >> > I would expect so. Why don't you try it? > >> Another question, why on earth did I have an old version of err.h? I >> was running >> 5.4 RELEASE, and it was installed from an ISO downloaded at FreeBSD.org >> > That does not look like an *old* version, it looks like a completely > different file. Did you install anything not from ports that might > have overwritten it? Did you try and install a port into a target > hierarchy that /usr/local? (The same copyright header as the real > 5.4 one exists in err.h from 4.11). > > Operating system bugs are rare compared to user errors, I'm afraid. > > --Alex > > As far as I can remember, I have not installed anything that didn't come from the ports collection. I have only used the ports, and always installed them to the default directory. I did not mean that this was a OS bug, and it would be really strange if it was since I can't find any other person that has had the same problem. There must be an application that overwrote my err.h. I've tried to provoke this error again, but I can't. I tried to install all the ports on another server (until i ran out of space), but the error did not occur. But with that said, there was 20 ports I didn't have enough space to install, so the problem might lie there. I might be the problem as well, maybe I did something I shouldn't have done. But I can't really see what that should be :) Anyway, the solution is here and I hope it can help other people that end up with the same problem (if that ever happens). Marius ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 13:41:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021F916A457 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:41:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nospam@mgedv.net) Received: from mgedv.at (www.mgedv.at [195.3.87.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9BA43D48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:41:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nospam@mgedv.net) Received: from metis (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mgedv.at (SMTPServer) with ESMTP id 8533D186800 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:41:20 +0200 (MEST) From: "mdff" To: Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:41:20 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <20050728011543.GA81114@sentinelchicken.net> Thread-Index: AcWTcbBm7tayRDoUT2G3FkNgeQOV8QAAtuIg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Message-Id: <20050728134120.8533D186800@mgedv.at> Subject: pkg_create: correct usage? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nospam@mgedv.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:41:23 -0000 i'm trying to create packages on freebsd-5.4-RELEASE. can anyone tell me how to define a packinglist for pkg_create with the ability to remove the directories after pkg_delete and not getting complaints if they are not empty? if i specify @dirrm in the packinglist, i get these errors, if some packages share a specific directory: # pkg_delete > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/lib' > pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing > list is incorrectly specified?) br... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 14:10:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE77916A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:10:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from numard@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (sigma.octantis.com.au [207.44.188.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AB444409 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:10:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from numard@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 24562 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2005 00:10:23 +1000 Received: from 203-173-32-215.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO ?192.168.13.3?) (203.173.32.215) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 29 Jul 2005 00:10:23 +1000 Message-ID: <42E8E749.10904@meijome.net> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:10:17 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Backup kernel - confirmation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:10:24 -0000 quick question - I have a remote box with SMP/HTT disabled, but I'd like to see how it works with it. If I make a copy of my current kernel to /kernel_orig, I should be able to install the SMP one as /kernel, and if hell breaks lose, I should be able to point it to /kernel_orig ... right? any caveats for this? ( I do off-band access to the server) thanks in advance, Beto From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 14:10:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4BEC16A42F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:10:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E8E44409 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:10:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.246.232] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A755255700C4; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:10:29 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6SEBRet070283; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:11:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6SEBH0d070280; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:11:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: vdm.fbsd@virgilio.it References: <42DC14FE0003EB30@ims1d.cp.tin.it> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:11:17 -0700 In-Reply-To: <42DC14FE0003EB30@ims1d.cp.tin.it> (vdm fbsd's message of "Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:16:08 +0200") Message-ID: <8noe8nvx4q.e8n@mail.opusnet.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with booting & MBR X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:10:31 -0000 vdm.fbsd@virgilio.it writes: > # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass# > /dev/ad1s2b none swap sw 0 0 > /dev/ad1s2a / ufs rw 1 1 > /dev/ad0s1a /usr/local ufs rw 0 0 > /dev/ad0s1d /var ufs rw 0 0 > /dev/ad0s1e /tmp ufs rw 0 0 > /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 > > Now, even though I read the booting procedure in the handbook and somewhere > else in the internet, issuing the various "fdisk -b B", "disklabel -b ..", > "boot0cfg ..", I was completely unable to modify the MBR and make this FreeBSD > only computer boot directly into this OS. If you're sticking to FreeBSD's boot0 MBR, you'll have to put one on each disk. I don't know if boot0 can remember "F5" as the default choice for auto-booting or not. But one way or another the first disk's boot0 needs to use "F5" to start the second disk's MBR/boot0 which needs to use "F2" by hand or from boot0cfg config. You could also use grub or lilo to do it too, but it's harder to set up. > P.S. Is it possible that some problems can arise by the fact that I used > an "a" slice (ad0s1a)for mounting /usr/local and freebsd starts from ad1s1a? Only the "easy-to-fix" problems that you're having. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 14:17:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03D816A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:17:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B9A4400C for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:58:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 20216 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2005 13:58:23 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Jul 2005 13:58:23 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 0F1DF2F; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:58:23 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Marcin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050727172134.409FA16A452@hub.freebsd.org> <20050727183822.GA30480@daedalus.desk.pl> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 28 Jul 2005 09:58:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050727183822.GA30480@daedalus.desk.pl> Message-ID: <444qaft4ld.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD file system example and question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:17:25 -0000 Marcin writes: > Hello, where can i find information or examples of how to write a file system for FreeBSD, apart from /usr/src/sys/* and /usr/share/man/*? The Architecure Handbook. (/usr/share/doc/en/arch-handbook) The old McKusick book (/usr/share/doc/en/design-44bsd) The new McKusick book (ISBN 0-201-70245-2) > What is vnode_if.h for? Why is it generated for every fs module if it is the same every time? I tried to google for the answer but found nothing. Only a note on Darwin's dev site. If I recall correctly that was a Sun-ism originally. It can be useful as a cross-platform tool, but I don't know if anyone is using it that way these days. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 14:17:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A7216A4AC for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:17:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29EF43ED2 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:56:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.246.232] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A3F6302D013C; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:56:06 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6SDv33i070069; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:57:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6SDuw80070068; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:56:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: Benjamin Lutz References: <27dbfc8c05072723541955ba02@mail.gmail.com> <42E8B777.7010908@datacomm.ch> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:56:58 -0700 In-Reply-To: <42E8B777.7010908@datacomm.ch> (Benjamin Lutz's message of "Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:46:15 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Valerio daelli Subject: Re: Grub not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:17:43 -0000 Benjamin Lutz writes: > Two guesses: > > - You can't write to a disks MBR while it's being used. I've seen > this myself, but I'm not exactly why this is, or how it can be > circumvented (other than booting from another device). Yes. It wasn't always this way. You can make a gruby boot floppy and from its command line, install to the MBR. You might have to mess around with storing the grub files in /boot/boot/grub instead of /boot/grub or something; see the grub info or just try it both ways. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 14:18:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538D516A445 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:18:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B94543D53 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:17:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.246.232] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A90025DB00C4; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:17:36 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6SEIYCQ070372; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:18:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6SEITlP070371; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:18:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: "Razvan" References: From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:18:29 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Razvan's message of "Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:26:10 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:18:15 -0000 "Razvan" writes: > What version of FreeBSD is indicat for my server ? You should have put that in the "Subject" line. I'd use 5.4-RELEASE until I encounted serious problems with it, when I'd switch to 5.4-STABLE before retrying and reporting the problems. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 14:28:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B592616A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:28:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6EE43D58 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:28:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j6SESud5029337; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:28:56 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:28:56 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Xu Qiang Message-ID: <20050728142855.GB81656@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20050728095226.152C61D938@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050728095226.152C61D938@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: groupadd/useradd in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:28:57 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 28), Xu Qiang said: > Btw, Just think of this problem: > > Although I have added the user "mysql" to my machine, I didn't set > its password. When does this newly added user get his/her password > and change it? No-one usually logs in as the mysql user, so you don't need to set one. Mysqld will automatically setuid() itself to the "mysql" user when it starts up. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 14:38:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9841716A420 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:38:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1721743D4C for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:38:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [82.41.37.55] ([82.41.37.55]) by smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:38:50 +0100 Message-ID: <42E8EDCC.5020604@dial.pipex.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:38:04 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050530 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Gary W. Swearingen" References: <42DC14FE0003EB30@ims1d.cp.tin.it> <8noe8nvx4q.e8n@mail.opusnet.com> In-Reply-To: <8noe8nvx4q.e8n@mail.opusnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2005 14:38:50.0561 (UTC) FILETIME=[11EB9310:01C59382] Cc: vdm.fbsd@virgilio.it, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with booting & MBR X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:38:07 -0000 Gary W. Swearingen wrote: >If you're sticking to FreeBSD's boot0 MBR, you'll have to put one on >each disk. I don't know if boot0 can remember "F5" as the default >choice for auto-booting or not. But one way or another the first >disk's boot0 needs to use "F5" to start the second disk's MBR/boot0 >which needs to use "F2" by hand or from boot0cfg config. > > Yes, it does. I believe it picks F5 when all the partitions before it are not set to boot. Once you've done the right sequence once, the machine will boot the same until interfered with. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 14:44:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38E016A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:44:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8EE43D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:44:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [82.41.37.55] ([82.41.37.55]) by smtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:44:55 +0100 Message-ID: <42E8EF39.3080207@dial.pipex.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:44:09 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050530 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marius Korsmo References: <20050728031706.fsbcd03hh4lcsg8g@elwolfie.com> <42E89EA9.7000508@dial.pipex.com> <20050728153603.ziaoeppp5s2s44g8@elwolfie.com> In-Reply-To: <20050728153603.ziaoeppp5s2s44g8@elwolfie.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2005 14:44:55.0311 (UTC) FILETIME=[EB5401F0:01C59382] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make buildworld fails in openssl/colldef [SOLVED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:44:12 -0000 Marius Korsmo wrote: >> That does not look like an *old* version, it looks like a completely >> different file. Did you install anything not from ports that might >> have overwritten it? Did you try and install a port into a target >> hierarchy that /usr/local? (The same copyright header as the real >> 5.4 one exists in err.h from 4.11). >> >> Operating system bugs are rare compared to user errors, I'm afraid. >> >> --Alex >> >> > As far as I can remember, I have not installed anything that didn't > come from > the ports collection. I have only used the ports, and always installed > them to > the default directory. > > I did not mean that this was a OS bug, and it would be really strange > if it was > since I can't find any other person that has had the same problem. > There must > be an application that overwrote my err.h. I've tried to provoke this > error > again, but I can't. I tried to install all the ports on another server > (until i > ran out of space), but the error did not occur. But with that said, > there was 20 > ports I didn't have enough space to install, so the problem might lie > there. > > I might be the problem as well, maybe I did something I shouldn't have > done. But > I can't really see what that should be :) Anyway, the solution is here > and I > hope it can help other people that end up with the same problem (if > that ever > happens). Then put it down as a mystery :-) If you are worried about it happening again, then just mail yourself the head of the file every day from cron. If it does change, at least you'll know better when it happened and might be better able to figure out what caused it. You could also force re-installation of your current ports on the same machine, but that might be more time than you care to spend. --Alex PS I suppose the clever way would be to head the file, egrep for Copyright then egrep -v the correct date (2003) since that will be empty when the file is correct. So you should be able to arrange for the mail to arrive only when there is a problem (which might be never again!). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 14:45:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF07E16A41F; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:45:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EEB543D45; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:45:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6SEjXI5033257; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:45:33 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) with ESMTP id j6SEjX3m033254; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:45:33 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:45:33 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Viren Patel In-Reply-To: <37675.146.6.178.5.1122498494.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> Message-ID: <20050728084428.J56124@wonkity.com> References: <37675.146.6.178.5.1122498494.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:45:33 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache13-modssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 port broken?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:45:35 -0000 On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Viren Patel wrote: > I am trying to install apache+mod_ssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 and > get the following: > > #make > ===> apache+mod_ssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 has known > vulnerabilities: > => apache -- http request smuggling. > Reference: > > => Please update your ports tree and try again. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/www/apache13-modssl. > > I have updated the ports tree and the files directory > contains the patch for this vulnerability > (patch-secfix-CAN-2005-2088). > > I need to install this port urgently. What am I doing > wrong?? If the vulnerability has not been fixed, how can I > force install? TIA. # make -DDISABLE_VULNERABILITIES will override portaudit. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 14:49:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB52216A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:49:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA6C43D49 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:49:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6SEnN1Y033288; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:49:23 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) with ESMTP id j6SEnNL6033285; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:49:23 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:49:23 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: FreeBsdBeni In-Reply-To: <200507272225.07899.freebsdbeni@spymac.com> Message-ID: <20050728084834.X56124@wonkity.com> References: <200507272225.07899.freebsdbeni@spymac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:49:23 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reading the volume-id/label of a cd/dvd ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:49:27 -0000 On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, FreeBsdBeni wrote: > Is there an easy way to get to know the volume id or disclabel of a cd or > dvd ? Mounting the cd/dvd just gives me the contents of the disc, but not its > "name". > In k3b one can ask the info about a disc and get all the info about the > inserted cd/dvd (disc type, tracks, sessions,...). But how do i get that info > without k3b ? Is there an easy way/solution ? cdrecord can get some info from a CD; see the -toc and -atip options. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 15:11:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B3A716A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:11:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E01EF43D48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:11:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2005 15:11:14 -0000 Received: from flb.schmalzbauer.de (EHLO cale.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de) [62.245.232.135] by mail.gmx.net (mp032) with SMTP; 28 Jul 2005 17:11:14 +0200 X-Authenticated: #301138 From: Emanuel Strobl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:10:36 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200507272225.07899.freebsdbeni@spymac.com> <20050728084834.X56124@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <20050728084834.X56124@wonkity.com> X-Birthday: Oct. 6th 1972 X-CelPhone: +49 (0) 173 9967781 X-Tel: +49 (0) 89 18947781 X-Country: Germany X-Address: Munich, 80686 X-OS: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4647002.tQ7oPjJCkS"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200507281710.45773@harrymail> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: FreeBsdBeni Subject: Re: Reading the volume-id/label of a cd/dvd ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:11:17 -0000 --nextPart4647002.tQ7oPjJCkS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Donnerstag, 28. Juli 2005 16:49 CEST schrieb Warren Block: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, FreeBsdBeni wrote: > > Is there an easy way to get to know the volume id or disclabel of a cd > > or dvd ? Mounting the cd/dvd just gives me the contents of the disc, > > but not its "name". > > In k3b one can ask the info about a disc and get all the info about > > the inserted cd/dvd (disc type, tracks, sessions,...). But how do i > > get that info without k3b ? Is there an easy way/solution ? > > cdrecord can get some info from a CD; see the -toc and -atip options. > > -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA There's glabel which reads many kind of FS volume labels. 'glabel load' or= =20 'man glabel' =2DHarry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --nextPart4647002.tQ7oPjJCkS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC6PV1Bylq0S4AzzwRAl+pAJ9fIg7FaTdouDPgLd79lnHrAmnJgACePOw6 wWPg6Xe/Qwyy12S2QN4Q7GM= =/Agt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4647002.tQ7oPjJCkS-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 15:28:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9D816A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:28:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8749043D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:28:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6SFSN3J035567; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:28:25 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <42E8F992.60301@daleco.biz> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:28:18 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050709 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Morgan References: <20050728112735.GA39925@sentinelchicken.net> In-Reply-To: <20050728112735.GA39925@sentinelchicken.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Boot page fault - alternative kernel needed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:28:28 -0000 Jason Morgan wrote: >I have an old laptop that I am finally trying to get FreeBSD installed on. >It was recently running Linux just fine, but I am having a tough time >getting FreeBSD installed on it. Here is the error I get when booting. >I have typed all that is visible on the screen when it crashes. > ># Begin > >isa0: on isab0 >atapci0: port 0x3000-0x300f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x >3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 1.1 on pci0 >ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 >ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 >uhci0: at device 1.2 on pci0 > > >Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode >fault virtual address = 0xeb97b >fault code = supervisor read, page not present >instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc00eb87c >stack pointer = 0x10:0xc10209f0 >frame pointer = 0x10:0xc10209f0 >code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 >processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 >current process = 0 (swapper) >trap number = 12 >panic: page fault > ># End > >So, my question is: Is this the UHCI driver failing to load >(happens at this same point every time I try to boot it)? >Is there any way around this? Possible using a trimmed down >kernel to boot? Any suggestions? > >Thanks in advance, >Jason > > Well, the error message seems to indicate that the swapper if failing ... but it could be that it's failing because the previously loaded uhci device code finds a bug in your hardware --- IANAE, but IIRC FBSD 5 (&& you don't say what version you're using) doesn't always play well with APM, ACPI, or what-not on some older laptops. We probably need someone else to tell us the exact incantation, but you might be able to 'escape to loader prompt' and set the equivalent of {ACPI_LOAD =0} (like I said, not sure of exact syntax) before attempting to boot (see loader(8) in the on-line manual or on another machine). If you're trying FBSD 5, I've heard of some people having success with older laptops and FBSD 4. Otherwise, they can run 5 but without APM or ACPI support. Like I said, I can't say for certain that this is what your issue is, but if you've not got a working system, it probably can't hurt to futz around with it a bit. Hopefully somebody else knows the magic words.... HTH, Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 15:57:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6D916A428 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:57:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob89@eng.ufl.edu) Received: from scorpion.eng.ufl.edu (scorpion.eng.ufl.edu [128.227.116.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 613E543D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:57:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob89@eng.ufl.edu) Received: (qmail 13397 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2005 15:57:43 -0000 Received: from scanner.engnet.ufl.edu (128.227.152.221) by scorpion.eng.ufl.edu with SMTP; 28 Jul 2005 15:57:43 -0000 From: Bob Johnson Organization: UF College of Engineering To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:57:42 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507281157.42688.bob89@eng.ufl.edu> Cc: Victor Semionov Subject: Re: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:57:47 -0000 Message: 6 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:20:31 +0300 From: Victor Semionov Subject: Re: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <200507281120.31564.victor@vmpbg.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" > > This is one of the things I find really hard to get Windows users to > > understand. They just won't believe that a company like Microsoft would > > still be using a filesystem that needs defragmenting if it were possible > > to design one that didn't. I often wonder why myself - after all, they > > must have put a fair amount of work into NTFS, which at least doesn't > > seem to get corrupted in a power failure. Did they make a trade-off I > > don't understand, or is it just incompetence - or worse, a deal with > > disk manufacturers to sell more disk? > Microsoft used to claim that NTFS doesn't need defragmentation. Compared to MSDOSFS, that's a reasonably accurate statement, but if you push it hard enough, it will still become fragmented. > Why is it unnecessary to defragment UFS? > In normal use, files never become fragmented enough to affect performance. In a (loose) sense, files are intentionally fragmented in a controlled way so that fragmentation doesn't cause problems. If you run fsck on a partition, you will typically see fragmentation levels of less than one percent. Also, keep in mind that in the default formatting, a FreeBSD partition has 8% of the disk space withheld from normal users to help keep the disk from becoming so full the system can't operate, and it has the side effect of helping to prevent fragmentation as well. It is why df can show a disk being as much as 108% full. It is possible to make this space available for normal use if, for example, you are using a partition only for data storage and you want to squeeze every last bit of space out of it, but of course there will be some performance penalty as it starts to get full. You can also adjust other disk parameters to optimize for your particular needs. See tunefs(8). If the disk gets close enough to full, the OS has no choice but to start fragmenting things. Try to keep your disks less than about 90% full (that's a number I remember from somewhere -- it's just a guideline and not a firm limit). My /home partition is 95% full according to df (which means it is actually a little under 90% full including the reserved capacity), and fsck shows 0.1% fragmentation. Of course, it's a fairly big partition, so it still has over a gigabyte of free space. Even the ISO CD images I downloaded a few days ago probably didn't get much fragmentation. - Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 16:03:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F125E16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:03:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from creep@daedalus.desk.pl) Received: from daedalus.desk.pl (daedalus.desk.pl [62.233.238.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899B943D49 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:03:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from creep@daedalus.desk.pl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daedalus.desk.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04DB4366520 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:53:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from daedalus.desk.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (daedalus [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30539-01 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:53:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: by daedalus.desk.pl (Postfix, from userid 1023) id B4E6136651C; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:53:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:53:17 +0200 From: Marcin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050728155317.GA30002@daedalus.desk.pl> References: <20050727172134.409FA16A452@hub.freebsd.org> <20050727183822.GA30480@daedalus.desk.pl> <444qaft4ld.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <444qaft4ld.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Antivirus: Skaner Antywirusowy DESK.pl Subject: Re: FreeBSD file system example and question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:03:01 -0000 Thanks! The arch-book is something i was looking for. Somehow i missed that when seeking doc/ m. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 16:08:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE76216A420 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:08:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bryan.maynard@reallm.com) Received: from hosting.sourcit.net (mail3.eitsolutions.net [68.23.20.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13DEF43D49 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:08:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bryan.maynard@reallm.com) Received: (qmail 18842 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2005 10:40:02 -0500 Received: from al1-24.207.169.154.charter-stl.com (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (24.207.169.154) by sourcit.net with SMTP; 28 Jul 2005 10:40:02 -0500 From: Bryan Maynard Organization: Sofos Nikitis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:39:06 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <42E8E749.10904@meijome.net> In-Reply-To: <42E8E749.10904@meijome.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507281039.06997.bryan.maynard@reallm.com> Subject: Re: Backup kernel - confirmation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:08:06 -0000 On Thursday 28 July 2005 02:10 pm, Norberto Meijome wrote: > quick question - I have a remote box with SMP/HTT disabled, but I'd > like to see how it works with it. If I make a copy of my current > kernel to /kernel_orig, I should be able to install the SMP one as > /kernel, and if hell breaks lose, I should be able to point it to > /kernel_orig ... right? Yes, you can do that. Also of note is that when FreeBSD compiles a kernel it takes the old kernel and renames it kernel.old. When FreeBSD is booting you can select which kernel to use simpy by entering "boot /boot/kernel.old/kernel" or "boot /boot/kernel_orig/kernel". I did this when I was tweak the kernel in my laptop. Check the boot man page for more info. > any caveats for this? ( I do off-band access to the server) Booting using "boot /boot/kernel.old/kernel" runs as if you were booting using your current kernel. I ran my laptop all day on my old kernel and did't see any problems. > thanks in advance, > Beto Thanks, Bryan -- Open Source: by the people, for the people. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 16:29:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B837016A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:29:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry.mityugov@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEAD43D60 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:29:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry.mityugov@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i1so452870wra for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:29:04 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iO0IN+YGRVfKCHS7JchCYZ4pYBImPydbJLo76v+KuqayhvYUZbn919lUxGHhNQL/WRIFWzW+20nO2EOYxaJB1yQkpr73YpXtIkqvg1//rlK6405uOoZuBb8oRr4UH3686BbIxIfpRf8d7lnwOwv4/8paCe9UnvHXigBkwJBTQzg= Received: by 10.54.83.5 with SMTP id g5mr867379wrb; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:29:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.56.33 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:29:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:29:04 +0400 From: Dmitry Mityugov To: asd asd <123asd123@email.si> In-Reply-To: <20050728103430.3EAD18B859@www1.email.si> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050728103430.3EAD18B859@www1.email.si> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: boot problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dmitry Mityugov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:29:05 -0000 On 7/28/05, asd asd <123asd123@email.si> wrote: > Hello! > I have problem with booting FreeBSD 5.4 on my laptop Toshiba Satellite 24= 10-304: > sometimes it boots without problem but sometimes it stops at line "uhci0:= 82801CA/CAM (ICH3) USB controller USB-A> port 0xefe0-0xefff irq 11 at dev= ice > 29.0 on pci0". Previous line is initialization of the Nvidia Grforce4 420= Go > graphic adapter. > Any idea what could be causing this problem? Is there any USB device attached to the laptop? Can you reproduce the problem when nothing is attached to it? --=20 Dmitry Mityugov, St. Petersburg, Russia I ignore all messages with confidentiality statements "We live less by imagination than despite it" - Rockwell Kent, "N by E" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 16:31:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C609E16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:31:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpk@dpk.net) Received: from shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net [207.246.149.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C8343D53 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:31:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpk@dpk.net) Received: from shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6SGVhrR083356 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:31:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dpk@localhost) by shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id j6SGVhS4083351 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:31:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net: dpk owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:31:43 -0700 (PDT) From: dpk X-X-Sender: dpk@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050727185853.D23753@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> Message-ID: <20050728093106.E79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> References: <20050727185853.D23753@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.4+SMP, severe network degredation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:31:44 -0000 By the way, I also compared GENERIC performance against GENERIC w/ "options SMP" added, and had the same results. On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, dpk wrote: > We just received several SuperMicro servers, 3.0Ghz Xeon x 2, 4GB RAM. > They're using the em driver and the ports are set to 1000Mbit (we also > tried 100Mbit/full duplex on the card and on the switch). They're running > FreeBSD 5.4. > > I ran a steady ping on a couple of them while they were running "GENERIC", > and then rebooted them with a kernel built with the "PAE" kernel included > with the installation, with "option SMP" added. > > The PAE-SMP-GENERIC kernel was built after cvsup'ing with "tag=RELENG_5_4" > and the uname reports "5.4-RELEASE-p5". > > Here are the ping results: > > GENERIC: > > 117 packets transmitted, 117 packets received, 0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.451/0.554/0.856/0.059 ms > > PAE-SMP-GENERIC: > > 102 packets transmitted, 102 packets received, 0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.569/4.262/7.944/2.065 ms > > Fetching a 637MB ISO from a local server, also on 100/FDX: > > GENERIC: > > /dev/null 100% of 637 MB 10 MBps 00m00s > > real 0m58.071s > user 0m1.954s > sys 0m6.278s > > PAE-SMP-GENERIC: > > /dev/null 100% of 637 MB 5764 kBps 00m00s > > real 1m53.324s > user 0m1.478s > sys 0m5.624s > > Running GENERIC, systat shows about 7000 interrupts/second, and around 600 > interrupts/second using PAE-SMP-GENERIC, while fetch was running. > > I've checked the errata and hardware notes, as well as gnats, and was not > able to find anything that explains or matches this behavior. We've run > SMP servers for years, using 4.5-4.11, but we've never seen the network > performance cut in half (or pings go up 10x). > > Removing "option SMP" makes the problem go away, but at a very significant > performance cost obviously. > > Could it be something from -p5? Is this explained/examined in a PR I've > missed, and if so can I add some information? > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 16:33:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0CD16A422 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:33:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpk@dpk.net) Received: from shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net [207.246.149.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81C043D4C for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:33:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpk@dpk.net) Received: from shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6SGXMrR083689 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:33:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dpk@localhost) by shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id j6SGXMAe083686 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:33:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net: dpk owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:33:22 -0700 (PDT) From: dpk X-X-Sender: dpk@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050728093106.E79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> Message-ID: <20050728093221.H79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> References: <20050727185853.D23753@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <20050728093106.E79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.4+SMP, severe network degredation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:33:23 -0000 Woah. Well, I guess I didn't try *everything*. Removing "device acpi" from the kernel config leaves me witih a PAE+SMP kernel that works fine. I can fetch files at wire speed and everything. So, I guess this issue is closed. acpi was the ultimate culprit. On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, dpk wrote: > By the way, I also compared GENERIC performance against GENERIC w/ > "options SMP" added, and had the same results. > > On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, dpk wrote: > > > We just received several SuperMicro servers, 3.0Ghz Xeon x 2, 4GB RAM. > > They're using the em driver and the ports are set to 1000Mbit (we also > > tried 100Mbit/full duplex on the card and on the switch). They're running > > FreeBSD 5.4. > > > > I ran a steady ping on a couple of them while they were running "GENERIC", > > and then rebooted them with a kernel built with the "PAE" kernel included > > with the installation, with "option SMP" added. > > > > The PAE-SMP-GENERIC kernel was built after cvsup'ing with "tag=RELENG_5_4" > > and the uname reports "5.4-RELEASE-p5". > > > > Here are the ping results: > > > > GENERIC: > > > > 117 packets transmitted, 117 packets received, 0% packet loss > > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.451/0.554/0.856/0.059 ms > > > > PAE-SMP-GENERIC: > > > > 102 packets transmitted, 102 packets received, 0% packet loss > > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.569/4.262/7.944/2.065 ms > > > > Fetching a 637MB ISO from a local server, also on 100/FDX: > > > > GENERIC: > > > > /dev/null 100% of 637 MB 10 MBps 00m00s > > > > real 0m58.071s > > user 0m1.954s > > sys 0m6.278s > > > > PAE-SMP-GENERIC: > > > > /dev/null 100% of 637 MB 5764 kBps 00m00s > > > > real 1m53.324s > > user 0m1.478s > > sys 0m5.624s > > > > Running GENERIC, systat shows about 7000 interrupts/second, and around 600 > > interrupts/second using PAE-SMP-GENERIC, while fetch was running. > > > > I've checked the errata and hardware notes, as well as gnats, and was not > > able to find anything that explains or matches this behavior. We've run > > SMP servers for years, using 4.5-4.11, but we've never seen the network > > performance cut in half (or pings go up 10x). > > > > Removing "option SMP" makes the problem go away, but at a very significant > > performance cost obviously. > > > > Could it be something from -p5? Is this explained/examined in a PR I've > > missed, and if so can I add some information? > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 16:36:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366E116A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:36:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from djh@nebcorp.com) Received: from ratchet.nebcorp.com (ratchet.nebcorp.com [205.217.153.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03ECD43D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:36:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from djh@nebcorp.com) Received: by ratchet.nebcorp.com (Postfix, from userid 1014) id CB08FD982A; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:36:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:36:51 -0700 From: Danny Howard To: Lei Sun Message-ID: <20050728163651.GA200@ratchet.nebcorp.com> References: <6.1.0.6.2.20050726233906.198d9de0@cobalt.antimatter.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Loop: djhoward@uiuc.edu Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Glenn Dawson Subject: Re: how to run 2 instance of memcached from rc.conf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:36:52 -0000 On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 11:59:59PM -0700, Lei Sun wrote: > Yeah, the tricky part is not to what to do, but how to do it. I know I > need to configure 2 ip or 2 ports. > > As the memcached.sh is using run_rc_command, and somehow, even if when > I am giving it 2 arguments with different port, it still can only > start up 1 process instead of 2. How are you giving anything different arguments? I only see one service configured in your rc.conf. > So how do I use the same script to run 2 instance of memcached? So, you have memcached1.sh : #!/bin/sh # # PROVIDE: memcached1 # REQUIRE: NETWORKING # # Add the following lines to /etc/rc.conf to run memcached: # # memcached1_enable="YES" # memcached1_flags="" # . /etc/rc.subr name="memcached1" rcvar=`set_rcvar` command=/usr/local/bin/memcached command_args="-du nobody ${memcached1_flags}" load_rc_config $name run_rc_command "$1" And then you have memcached2.sh : #!/bin/sh # # PROVIDE: memcached2 # REQUIRE: NETWORKING # # Add the following lines to /etc/rc.conf to run memcached: # # memcached2_enable="YES" # memcached2_flags="" # . /etc/rc.subr name="memcached2" rcvar=`set_rcvar` command=/usr/local/bin/memcached command_args="-du nobody ${memcached2_flags}" load_rc_config $name run_rc_command "$1" And you set memcached1_flags and memcached2_flags in rc.conf where you were setting memcache_flags formerly. However, unless you really know what you are doing, if you are trying to run TWO memchached instances, I'd suspect, as another has asserted, that your understanding of memcached is flawed. I'd check with the memcached community to see if there isn't a better way to get things done in the first place. Sincerely, -danny -- http://dannyman.toldme.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 16:39:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FADB16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:39:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from djh@nebcorp.com) Received: from ratchet.nebcorp.com (ratchet.nebcorp.com [205.217.153.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9F143D4C for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:39:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from djh@nebcorp.com) Received: by ratchet.nebcorp.com (Postfix, from userid 1014) id 23085D982A; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:39:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:39:38 -0700 From: Danny Howard To: Maarten Message-ID: <20050728163938.GB200@ratchet.nebcorp.com> References: <11727.194.151.102.253.1122448055.squirrel@194.151.102.253> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <11727.194.151.102.253.1122448055.squirrel@194.151.102.253> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Loop: djhoward@uiuc.edu Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sterminal or alternative X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:39:38 -0000 On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 09:07:35AM +0200, Maarten wrote: > Is anyone aware if there have been efforts to port sterminal? If not, are > there any ported alternatives which I have overlooked? Maarten, Perhaps you can get it ported easily. :) http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/ Thank you for contributing, and good luck! Sincerely, -danny -- http://dannyman.toldme.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 16:40:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8543C16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:40:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gad@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp2.server.rpi.edu (smtp2.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E9B43D4C for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:40:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gad@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp2.server.rpi.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j6SGeUsu021057; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:40:32 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <1136.217.37.3.201.1122541837.squirrel@www.orbweavers.co.uk> References: <1559.192.168.0.10.1122502486.squirrel@192.168.0.5> <1136.217.37.3.201.1122541837.squirrel@www.orbweavers.co.uk> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:40:29 -0400 To: martin@orbweavers.co.uk From: Garance A Drosehn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-RPI-SA-Score: undef - spam-scanning disabled X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) on 128.113.2.2 Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Shell script frustration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:40:34 -0000 At 10:10 AM +0100 7/28/05, martin@orbweavers.co.uk wrote: >Garance wrote: > > What I do in this cases is create a script called "list_args.sh": >> >> #!/bin/sh >> printf "\nlist_args.sh at `date +%H:%M:%S` with \$# = $#\n" >> # Process all parameters. >> N=0 >> while test $# != 0 ; do >> N=$(($N+1)) >> printf " \$$N = [%3d] '$1'\n" ${#1} >> shift >> done >> >> Then in your script, replace the ldapdelete command with >> list_args.sh. That way you'll see *exactly* what ldapdelete >> is seeing for parameters, and that might help. > >I tried that one, with an echo $* - though I assume the printf >prints it out 'more precise'? Well, I also have versions that use an echo instead of printf. The printf just makes it easier to have a "pretty" output. The problem with using a plain 'echo *' is that there are several different inputs which will produce the same output. Compare: echo a b and echo "a b" or echo "a b" and echo "a b " The outputs from `echo' will look the same, but the arguments to the program are very different. That's why my script lists out the exact arguments, with their lengths. I did that because sometimes those details matter. I have solved problems similar to the one which is frustrating you by using this kind of script. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@FreeBSD.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Troy, NY; USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 16:41:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13C116A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:41:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F5C43D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:41:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x37so102135nfc for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:41:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SdKz5zy8oijy5RvajShsu8tDjPekVNBP6uxC/4Ez4bCKm+uvZmT8KhjmwflwG3f1a3w8VFtXqjHEN90z/d0wX/ojQY9lKzSWyiFZQrx7F78SLHrdB1+6mDGcpo5r/gtKTPKFFE13clLM8VKWfcFb6d8SyH08U0oQhNkRwBantuk= Received: by 10.48.1.18 with SMTP id 18mr82025nfa; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:41:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.239.11 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:41:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:41:55 +0100 From: Freminlins To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200507281157.42688.bob89@eng.ufl.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200507281157.42688.bob89@eng.ufl.edu> Subject: Re: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Freminlins List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:41:59 -0000 On 7/28/05, Bob Johnson wrote: > > Why is it unnecessary to defragment UFS? > > >=20 > In normal use, files never become fragmented enough to affect performance= . In > a (loose) sense, files are intentionally fragmented in a controlled way s= o > that fragmentation doesn't cause problems. If you run fsck on a partitio= n, > you will typically see fragmentation levels of less than one percent. >=20 > Also, keep in mind that in the default formatting, a FreeBSD partition ha= s 8% > of the disk space withheld from normal users to help keep the disk from > becoming so full the system can't operate, and it has the side effect of > helping to prevent fragmentation as well. It is why df can show a disk b= eing > as much as 108% full. It is possible to make this space available for no= rmal > use if, for example, you are using a partition only for data storage and = you > want to squeeze every last bit of space out of it, but of course there wi= ll > be some performance penalty as it starts to get full. You can also adjus= t > other disk parameters to optimize for your particular needs. See tunefs(= 8). >=20 > If the disk gets close enough to full, the OS has no choice but to start > fragmenting things. Try to keep your disks less than about 90% full (tha= t's > a number I remember from somewhere -- it's just a guideline and not a fir= m > limit). My /home partition is 95% full according to df (which means it i= s > actually a little under 90% full including the reserved capacity), and fs= ck > shows 0.1% fragmentation. Of course, it's a fairly big partition, so it > still has over a gigabyte of free space. Even the ISO CD images I downlo= aded > a few days ago probably didn't get much fragmentation. Apparently UFS can get fragmented even when there is lots of apparently free space: http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/sprakki?entry=3Dufs_file_system_defragment= ation Obviously this is Sun UFS, but there is a common heritage. I've never needed to do any sort of defrag on either FreeBSD or Solaris though. > - Bob Frem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 17:50:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3E516A420 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:50:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0E743D55 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:50:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6SHohGi031884 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:50:44 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050728104154.1b1fe660@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:47:04 -0700 To: Danny Howard , Lei Sun From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <20050728163651.GA200@ratchet.nebcorp.com> References: <6.1.0.6.2.20050726233906.198d9de0@cobalt.antimatter.net> <20050728163651.GA200@ratchet.nebcorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to run 2 instance of memcached from rc.conf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:50:46 -0000 At 09:36 AM 7/28/2005, Danny Howard wrote: >How are you giving anything different arguments? I only see one service >configured in your rc.conf. > > > So how do I use the same script to run 2 instance of memcached? From my original email: then, you can use two sets of variables in /etc/rc.conf like: memcached_enable="YES" memcached_flags="-m 2 -l 10.1.1.245 -p 11211" memcached2_enable="YES" memcached2_flags="-m 2 -l 10.1.1.245 -p 11212" -Glenn >So, you have memcached1.sh : > >#!/bin/sh ># > ># PROVIDE: memcached1 ># REQUIRE: NETWORKING > ># ># Add the following lines to /etc/rc.conf to run memcached: ># ># memcached1_enable="YES" ># memcached1_flags="" ># >. /etc/rc.subr > >name="memcached1" >rcvar=`set_rcvar` >command=/usr/local/bin/memcached >command_args="-du nobody ${memcached1_flags}" >load_rc_config $name >run_rc_command "$1" > >And then you have memcached2.sh : > >#!/bin/sh ># > ># PROVIDE: memcached2 ># REQUIRE: NETWORKING > ># ># Add the following lines to /etc/rc.conf to run memcached: ># ># memcached2_enable="YES" ># memcached2_flags="" ># >. /etc/rc.subr > >name="memcached2" >rcvar=`set_rcvar` >command=/usr/local/bin/memcached >command_args="-du nobody ${memcached2_flags}" >load_rc_config $name >run_rc_command "$1" > >And you set memcached1_flags and memcached2_flags in rc.conf where you >were setting memcache_flags formerly. > >However, unless you really know what you are doing, if you are trying to >run TWO memchached instances, I'd suspect, as another has asserted, that >your understanding of memcached is flawed. I'd check with the memcached >community to see if there isn't a better way to get things done in the >first place. > >Sincerely, >-danny > >-- >http://dannyman.toldme.com/ >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 18:06:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37AF616A420 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:06:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bettan@nerim.net) Received: from kraid.nerim.net (smtp-104-thursday.nerim.net [62.4.16.104]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD8443D55 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:06:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bettan@nerim.net) Received: from danielle (linux-win.org [62.212.96.206]) by kraid.nerim.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 40C9840EF0 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:06:49 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <003f01c5939f$20a53bf0$0301a8c0@danielle> From: "cell" To: Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:06:49 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Samba over VPN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:06:53 -0000 Hello , i have created a VPN ( with openvpn-2.0_3 on freebsd 5.4 ) = between my network who has a gateway on freebsd 5.4 and others computer = on win xp, and a network who has windows xp home as gateway.Windows xp = home gateway used openvpn 2 too and i have created a bridge in my = freebsd gateway and the windows xp gateway have created a bridge too.Now = , i have configured samba on my freebsd gateway and i must see normally = (in my computers on windows xp ) the windows xp gateway of the other = network in my workgroup but i just see this computer for ten minutes !!! = After that , i don't see it any more and i don't understand why !!! = Anyone have an idea for this problem ?=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 18:25:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3C716A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:25:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C00243D48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:25:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:9883 helo=mail.aseed.antenna.nl) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1DyD4w-0001a5-Bf for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:25:58 +0000 Received: from http.aseed.antenna.nl (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by mail.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A3715437E for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:30:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (217-19-30-147.dsl.cambrium.nl [217.19.30.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A70D58C607 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:26:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:25:55 +0200 From: "albi@scii.nl" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050728202555.04233dd3.albi@scii.nl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: script for adding a samba-user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:26:00 -0000 hi, been working on a script to add a samba-user, below an example which is not working, can someone provide the fix here to make it work properly ? #!/bin/sh adduser -G data -s scponly $1 smbpasswd $1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 18:29:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F1C16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:29:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from breeves@fmolhs.org) Received: from mail52-kan-R.bigfish.com (mail-kan.bigfish.com [63.161.60.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B8D43D53 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:29:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from breeves@fmolhs.org) Received: from mail52-kan.bigfish.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail52-kan-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A92FD8988 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:29:13 +0000 (UTC) X-BigFish: VC Received: by mail52-kan (MessageSwitch) id 112257535316203_12963; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:29:13 +0000 (UCT) Received: from zixvpm02.ololrmc.com (zixvpm02.ololrmc.com [64.56.25.112]) by mail52-kan.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE4FD9527 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:29:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zixvpm02.ololrmc.com (ZixVPM [127.0.0.1]) by Outbound.zixvpm.ololrmc.com (Proprietary) with ESMTP id 4553C4C0A9 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:28:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mis_17.ololrmc.com (unknown [172.20.21.17]) by zixvpm02.ololrmc.com (Proprietary) with ESMTP id AB4EF4C0A7 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:28:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: by MIS_17 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:28:55 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Reeves, Brandon" To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:28:53 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Wireless with Aironet 350 Card Help needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:29:17 -0000 I have a Freebsd 5.3 Laptop with an Aironet 350 Card. I can get the card associated with the AP using WEP etc. However, I still can not ping the outside internet. I had this working while I was initially toying with the card but for some reason it no longer works. This is a new card I have added to my laptop to enable wireless since the embedded Intel card is not supported. I also can not ping any machine on the wireless and none of my other machines can ping me.. Any insight into this would be greatly appreciated. One more note, I have installed the Linux-ACU port and it says I am associated but still gets no communication. Thanks Brandon Reeves Information Systems Security FMOL Health System Ph. 225.765.7984 Fax: 225.765.5804 breeves@fmolhs.org ***FMOL Health System encrypts email containing Patient Health Information. You will receive a notice with instructions on how to open any encrypted email you receive. To learn more, go to this web site: http://userawareness.zixcorp.com/sites/index.php?b=158&type=1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 18:33:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28CB16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:33:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4E043D49 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:33:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x37so105855nfc for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:33:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iH9m7rMwTwCSEPjOnOIRKNjGw6aC9h1g03RBmXwp1q/dVFT8Rp3MtROnUkT2ri8FPkASmQ7YR5cCq6ELKfHv9tdTqaNXoB3trLc2vlDD55UcDMeup7lMpNQGxiaLYubR7v4vFBnqX6HIoieRE29RaFaqkkcxQPHdbOnpBHBfG48= Received: by 10.48.1.18 with SMTP id 18mr85082nfa; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:33:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.239.11 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:33:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:33:31 +0100 From: Freminlins To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <060c01c59397$2876b460$c901a8c0@workdog> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <060c01c59397$2876b460$c901a8c0@workdog> Subject: Re: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Freminlins List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:33:33 -0000 Gayn Winters wrote: =20 > What I get from reading this article is that if the use of the file > system is to store lots of small files, then use a small block size. Am > I missing something? No and yes! There is a minimum block and fragment size. In this case there were not enough contiguous fragments to enable an 8K file to be created. Without checking I believe Solaris uses 8K blocks. > Also, in most situations, buying a big enough disk is far better than > worrying about what happens when a not-big-enough disk starts to get > full. Indeed. But... in the case I linked to there was apparently plenty of free space, just not enough free contiguous space. The author also implies that a bigger disk would not solve the problem: "it creates and deletes tons of small files and thus the fragmentation=20 over a period of time." As mentioned though I have never seen this myself despite running very busy mail and web servers with what must be billions of files being created/deleted in that time. It certainly grabbed my attention so I thought it may be of interest to oth= ers. > -gayn Frem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 18:38:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4638D16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:38:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA02C43D48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:38:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from epia2.farid-hajji.net (epia-2 [192.168.254.11]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CBAC4BDF3; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:37:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:39:44 +0200 From: cpghost To: Igor Robul Message-ID: <20050728183944.GA3230@epia2.farid-hajji.net> References: <20050727063458.GA30227@ppk.itb.ac.id> <42E74D3F.3000409@speechpro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42E74D3F.3000409@speechpro.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xorg keyboard layout X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:38:56 -0000 On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 01:00:47PM +0400, Igor Robul wrote: > Dikshie wrote: > > >Dear All, > >because my laptop is Japanese laptop so I define > >keymap="jp.106" on /etc/rc.conf > >BUT when I do startx (using XORG 6.8.2) > >the keyboard layout back to default (generic english keyboard) ! > > > >How to keep keymap="jp.106" still valid on XORG ? > > > > > Console keyboard and X11 keyboard are configured in different places. > To configure Xorg keyboard look at manual page for xorg.cfg, or use > xorgcfg utility, but make backup of your existing xorg.cfg. Or use setxkbmap(1) with one of the maps in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb/symbols/pc/ Regards, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 18:40:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40B916A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:40:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tummytech@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D4443D48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:40:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tummytech@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so735850rne for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:40:43 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aKXgKzehZ3begnO3imldJqFot6m0f5JqETT/CEyirDIZBhTypkvr+ehKrNXJe151F9tQx1CLynbrRIbdtQPp/G8w88ZrKvnB9ykpV45q6StdMzAdQvtPYTofncwZ7Hz6RUa3u0qkLZJ83eeFk3tfk3YYqjo2whQhAsLH78rRF7w= Received: by 10.38.208.76 with SMTP id f76mr1378413rng; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:40:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.88.61 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:40:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <860807bf05072811403aa956e8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:40:43 -0700 From: Benson Wong In-Reply-To: <20050728093221.H79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050727185853.D23753@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <20050728093106.E79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <20050728093221.H79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.4+SMP, severe network degredation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Benson Wong List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:40:45 -0000 I've been having similar issues after upgrading to the latest 5.4-STABLE. I used to have it running 5.4-STABLE with the GENERIC PAE kernel. I rebuilt the world, and the kernel and now my bge (1Gbit) gets a lot of "watchdog timeout -- resetting" issues. I have acpi enabled in my kernel as well, perhaps this is also affecting my server. I can't remember if the config has ACPI enabled in the kernel. The only other difference I found in my old kernel (PAE) configs and the generic one that comes with 5.4 is: nodevice ehci (enhanced USB driver). I'll try it with the NODEVICE ehci first and see if that fixes the load / card issues. If not I'll try it with no acpi. Thanks for the info. On 7/28/05, dpk wrote: > Woah. Well, I guess I didn't try *everything*. Removing "device acpi" fro= m > the kernel config leaves me witih a PAE+SMP kernel that works fine. I can > fetch files at wire speed and everything. >=20 > So, I guess this issue is closed. acpi was the ultimate culprit. >=20 > On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, dpk wrote: >=20 > > By the way, I also compared GENERIC performance against GENERIC w/ > > "options SMP" added, and had the same results. > > > > On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, dpk wrote: > > > > > We just received several SuperMicro servers, 3.0Ghz Xeon x 2, 4GB RAM= . > > > They're using the em driver and the ports are set to 1000Mbit (we als= o > > > tried 100Mbit/full duplex on the card and on the switch). They're run= ning > > > FreeBSD 5.4. > > > > > > I ran a steady ping on a couple of them while they were running "GENE= RIC", > > > and then rebooted them with a kernel built with the "PAE" kernel incl= uded > > > with the installation, with "option SMP" added. > > > > > > The PAE-SMP-GENERIC kernel was built after cvsup'ing with "tag=3DRELE= NG_5_4" > > > and the uname reports "5.4-RELEASE-p5". > > > > > > Here are the ping results: > > > > > > GENERIC: > > > > > > 117 packets transmitted, 117 packets received, 0% packet loss > > > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev =3D 0.451/0.554/0.856/0.059 ms > > > > > > PAE-SMP-GENERIC: > > > > > > 102 packets transmitted, 102 packets received, 0% packet loss > > > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev =3D 0.569/4.262/7.944/2.065 ms > > > > > > Fetching a 637MB ISO from a local server, also on 100/FDX: > > > > > > GENERIC: > > > > > > /dev/null 100% of 637 MB 10 MB= ps 00m00s > > > > > > real 0m58.071s > > > user 0m1.954s > > > sys 0m6.278s > > > > > > PAE-SMP-GENERIC: > > > > > > /dev/null 100% of 637 MB 5764 kB= ps 00m00s > > > > > > real 1m53.324s > > > user 0m1.478s > > > sys 0m5.624s > > > > > > Running GENERIC, systat shows about 7000 interrupts/second, and aroun= d 600 > > > interrupts/second using PAE-SMP-GENERIC, while fetch was running. > > > > > > I've checked the errata and hardware notes, as well as gnats, and was= not > > > able to find anything that explains or matches this behavior. We've r= un > > > SMP servers for years, using 4.5-4.11, but we've never seen the netwo= rk > > > performance cut in half (or pings go up 10x). > > > > > > Removing "option SMP" makes the problem go away, but at a very signif= icant > > > performance cost obviously. > > > > > > Could it be something from -p5? Is this explained/examined in a PR I'= ve > > > missed, and if so can I add some information? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" >=20 --=20 blog: http://www.mostlygeek.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 18:56:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E8CF16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:56:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D9643D48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:56:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B716F2208F0 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:56:15 -0500 (CDT) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32231-15 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:56:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [204.26.70.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D100721D1D5 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:56:10 -0500 (CDT) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:55:57 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <20050727144308.99544.qmail@web61214.mail.yahoo.com> <20050727103809.I87833@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <20050727103809.I87833@makeworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4424870.tYEYYrSH6d"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200507281356.01019.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: Re: huh? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:56:17 -0000 --nextPart4424870.tYEYYrSH6d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 27 July 2005 10:39, Chris wrote: > > Do you have curses like "cisco rhce msce CCNA" , maybe > > for free ? > YOU - are an idiot... Read the list name... FreeBSD Questions... I think he meant to ask, "are there FreeBSD certifications similar to RHCE,= =20 MSCE, etc.?", which is a perfectly legitimate question. Don't be so quick= =20 to anger. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart4424870.tYEYYrSH6d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBC6SpB5sRg+Y0CpvERAoSPAJ4vDvQr8tRzd9P4TvSJkCOgnUJAFQCgmEtE 7DCBxoZWxl0014+gD9pgwAQ= =0A6s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4424870.tYEYYrSH6d-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 18:59:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B6316A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:59:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from smtpauth09.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth09.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2F043D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:59:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from [206.255.31.21] (helo=yoda.datawok.com) by smtpauth09.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1DyDbA-0003uN-Fu; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:59:16 -0400 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:00:39 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200507281400.39154.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69563f9fea00a6dd62bcb5b08923a21618c16168e03fabcdba44350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 206.255.31.21 Cc: "Reeves, Brandon" Subject: Re: Wireless with Aironet 350 Card Help needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:59:17 -0000 On Thursday 28 July 2005 01:28 pm, Reeves, Brandon wrote: > I have a Freebsd 5.3 Laptop with an Aironet 350 Card. I can get the > card associated with the AP using WEP etc. However, I still can not > ping the outside internet. I had this working while I was initially > toying with the card but for some reason it no longer works. This is > a new card I have added to my laptop to enable wireless since the > embedded Intel card is not supported. I also can not ping any machine > on the wireless and none of my other machines can ping me.. Any > insight into this would be greatly appreciated. One more note, I > have installed the Linux-ACU port and it says I am associated but > still gets no communication. > > Thanks > > > Brandon Reeves > Information Systems Security > FMOL Health System > Ph. 225.765.7984 > Fax: 225.765.5804 > breeves@fmolhs.org > Brandon, Please forgive the "obvious" questions: 1. Are you pinging using hostnames or ip addresses? 2. Does the result of 'ifconfig an0' show an ip address and netmask for the wireless interface? (I'm assuming the wireless interface is an0.) 3. Was the wireless interface configured manually or did you use dhclient? 4. Is the default gateway set? 5. Are the contents of /etc/resolv.conf correct? 6. Did you add the local network hosts to /etc/hosts? 7. Does your laptop have an active firewall that may be blocking packets? Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 19:05:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA6316A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:05:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7920C43D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:05:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6SJ5nXh001447 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:05:49 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050728114812.1bbe0c70@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:02:08 -0700 To: "albi@scii.nl" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <20050728202555.04233dd3.albi@scii.nl> References: <20050728202555.04233dd3.albi@scii.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: script for adding a samba-user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:05:50 -0000 At 11:25 AM 7/28/2005, albi@scii.nl wrote: >hi, > >been working on a script to add a samba-user, below an example which is >not working, can someone provide the fix here to make it work properly ? It's difficult to help since you didn't provide a description of the problem beyond "not working". Taking a guess, I'd say that your problem is related to your use of the -s option to adduser. That option specifies the shell for the user you are trying to add. Even if you have a shell called "scponly" you would need to include the full path to that shell. -Glenn >#!/bin/sh >adduser -G data -s scponly $1 >smbpasswd $1 > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 19:07:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F80D16A424 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:07:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09FA643D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:07:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 6383 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2005 19:07:13 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Jul 2005 19:07:13 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 91D672F; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:07:12 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Bob Johnson References: <200507281157.42688.bob89@eng.ufl.edu> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 28 Jul 2005 15:07:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200507281157.42688.bob89@eng.ufl.edu> Message-ID: <44ll3qu4v3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 41 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Victor Semionov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:07:14 -0000 Bob Johnson writes: > Message: 6 > Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:20:31 +0300 > From: Victor Semionov > Subject: Re: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11 > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <200507281120.31564.victor@vmpbg.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" > > > > > This is one of the things I find really hard to get Windows users to > > > understand. They just won't believe that a company like Microsoft would > > > still be using a filesystem that needs defragmenting if it were possible > > > to design one that didn't. I often wonder why myself - after all, they > > > must have put a fair amount of work into NTFS, which at least doesn't > > > seem to get corrupted in a power failure. Did they make a trade-off I > > > don't understand, or is it just incompetence - or worse, a deal with > > > disk manufacturers to sell more disk? > > > > Microsoft used to claim that NTFS doesn't need defragmentation. Compared to > MSDOSFS, that's a reasonably accurate statement, but if you push it hard > enough, it will still become fragmented. > > > Why is it unnecessary to defragment UFS? > > > > In normal use, files never become fragmented enough to affect performance. In > a (loose) sense, files are intentionally fragmented in a controlled way so > that fragmentation doesn't cause problems. If you run fsck on a partition, > you will typically see fragmentation levels of less than one percent. Careful, there; "fragmentation" on a UFS is measuring a completely different thing than the same term applied to a Microsoft filesystem. For UFS, it refers to non-contiguous free blocks (fragments, actually), as opposed to the Microsoft terminology, where it refers to non-contiguous blocks within the same file. Everything you are saying is correct, but it will confuse people who don't realize the difference. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 19:08:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D435116A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:08:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@sigd.net) Received: from ms05.mailstreet2003.net (MS05.mailstreet2003.net [63.251.155.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827E243D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:08:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@sigd.net) Received: from 216.253.190.66 ([216.253.190.66]) by ms05.mailstreet2003.net ([10.0.25.5]) via Exchange Front-End Server owa.mailstreet2003.net ([10.0.25.4]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:09:01 +0000 Received: from home.sigd.net by owa.mailstreet2003.net; 28 Jul 2005 14:07:49 -0500 From: Chris Haulmark To: cell In-Reply-To: <003f01c5939f$20a53bf0$0301a8c0@danielle> References: <003f01c5939f$20a53bf0$0301a8c0@danielle> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:07:49 -0500 Message-Id: <1122577669.84295.8.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Samba over VPN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: chris@sigd.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:08:58 -0000 On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 20:06 +0200, cell wrote: > Hello , i have created a VPN ( with openvpn-2.0_3 on freebsd 5.4 ) between my network who has a gateway on freebsd 5.4 and others computer on win xp, and a network who has windows xp home as gateway.Windows xp home gateway used openvpn 2 too and i have created a bridge in my freebsd gateway and the windows xp gateway have created a bridge too.Now , i have configured samba on my freebsd gateway and i must see normally (in my computers on windows xp ) the windows xp gateway of the other network in my workgroup but i just see this computer for ten minutes !!! After that , i don't see it any more and i don't understand why !!! Anyone have an idea for this problem ? > Turn on word wrap please. Draw a diagram of what your network looks like. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 19:13:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B68C16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:13:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@sigd.net) Received: from ms05.mailstreet2003.net (MS05.mailstreet2003.net [63.251.155.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B0443D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:13:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@sigd.net) Received: from 216.253.190.66 ([216.253.190.66]) by ms05.mailstreet2003.net ([10.0.25.5]) via Exchange Front-End Server owa.mailstreet2003.net ([10.0.25.4]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:13:26 +0000 Received: from home.sigd.net by owa.mailstreet2003.net; 28 Jul 2005 14:12:14 -0500 From: Chris Haulmark To: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20050728114812.1bbe0c70@cobalt.antimatter.net> References: <20050728202555.04233dd3.albi@scii.nl> <6.1.0.6.2.20050728114812.1bbe0c70@cobalt.antimatter.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:12:13 -0500 Message-Id: <1122577933.84295.10.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: "albi@scii.nl" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: script for adding a samba-user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: chris@sigd.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:13:23 -0000 On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 12:02 -0700, Glenn Dawson wrote: > At 11:25 AM 7/28/2005, albi@scii.nl wrote: > > >hi, > > > >been working on a script to add a samba-user, below an example which is > >not working, can someone provide the fix here to make it work properly ? > > It's difficult to help since you didn't provide a description of the > problem beyond "not working". > > Taking a guess, I'd say that your problem is related to your use of the -s > option to adduser. That option specifies the shell for the user you are > trying to add. Even if you have a shell called "scponly" you would need to > include the full path to that shell. I also suspect not using -a for smbpasswd to add a new user. Someone needs to read up on the manpages for those commands. Chris > > -Glenn > > > >#!/bin/sh > >adduser -G data -s scponly $1 > >smbpasswd $1 > > > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 19:15:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB0D16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:15:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B21243D48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:15:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: from reverse-213-146-114-24.cust.kamp-dsl.de [213.146.114.24] (helo=reverse-213-146-114-24.cust.kamp-dsl.de) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKwh2-1DyDrF1iOI-0006rf; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:15:53 +0200 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:21:11 +0200 (CEST) From: "P.U.Kruppa" X-X-Sender: root@www.pukruppa.net To: "albi@scii.nl" In-Reply-To: <20050728202555.04233dd3.albi@scii.nl> Message-ID: <20050728211720.A48905@www.pukruppa.net> References: <20050728202555.04233dd3.albi@scii.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:2446dbdf8275641f979193ced594c629 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: script for adding a samba-user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:15:57 -0000 On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, albi@scii.nl wrote: > > hi, > > been working on a script to add a samba-user, below an example which is > not working, can someone provide the fix here to make it work properly ? > > #!/bin/sh > adduser -G data -s scponly $1 > smbpasswd $1 Assuming you use samba3 something like echo $PASSWORD | pw useradd $USER_NAME -g $GROUP -s /bin/sh \ -h fd -c "$REAL_NAME" -m (echo $PASSWORD; echo $PASSWORD)| smbpasswd -s -a $USER_NAME) should do. Regards, Uli. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ********************************************* * Peter Ulrich Kruppa - Wuppertal - Germany * ********************************************* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 19:19:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D920316A420 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:19:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from post-22.mail.nl.demon.net (post-22.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3FC43D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:19:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:9892 helo=mail.aseed.antenna.nl) by post-22.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1DyDuh-000ABs-6E; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:19:27 +0000 Received: from http.aseed.antenna.nl (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by mail.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424DC15437E; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:24:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (217-19-30-147.dsl.cambrium.nl [217.19.30.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9AD958C606; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:19:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:19:24 +0200 From: "albi@scii.nl" To: Glenn Dawson Message-Id: <20050728211924.29cb2629.albi@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20050728114812.1bbe0c70@cobalt.antimatter.net> References: <20050728202555.04233dd3.albi@scii.nl> <6.1.0.6.2.20050728114812.1bbe0c70@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: script for adding a samba-user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:19:29 -0000 On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:02:08 -0700 Glenn Dawson wrote: > >been working on a script to add a samba-user, below an example which > >is not working, can someone provide the fix here to make it work > >properly ? > > It's difficult to help since you didn't provide a description of the > problem beyond "not working". i forgot the -a option for smbpasswd and the $1 for adduser was not needed, the modified script below seems to be working instead #!/bin/sh adduser -G data -s scponly smbpasswd -a $1 sorry for not being clear, and thanks for your input! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 19:34:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E21F716A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:34:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lowell@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 980AB43D48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:34:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lowell@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 5103 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2005 19:34:07 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Jul 2005 19:34:07 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 7BDBC2F; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:34:06 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <060c01c59397$2876b460$c901a8c0@workdog> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 28 Jul 2005 15:34:06 -0400 Message-ID: <44ek9iu3m9.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 54 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:34:08 -0000 Freminlins writes: > Gayn Winters wrote: > > > What I get from reading this article is that if the use of the file > > system is to store lots of small files, then use a small block size. Am > > I missing something? > > No and yes! There is a minimum block and fragment size. In this case > there were not enough contiguous fragments to enable an 8K file to be > created. Without checking I believe Solaris uses 8K blocks. That's correct, and also note that Solaris does not offer the flexibility in block sizes that is available from FreeBSD. And it is correct that a small block size will vastly reduce the ability to hit this fully-fragmented condition. At a cost of higher overhead, of course. > > Also, in most situations, buying a big enough disk is far better than > > worrying about what happens when a not-big-enough disk starts to get > > full. > > Indeed. But... in the case I linked to there was apparently plenty of > free space, just not enough free contiguous space. The author also > implies that a bigger disk would not solve the problem: > > "it creates and deletes tons of small files and thus the fragmentation > over a period of time." Where "plenty of free space" is a large absolute number, but still a small fraction of the disk. Full fragmentation of the empty space becomes exponentially less likely as the amount of free space increases. Note that when deciding where to allocate a fragment, there are two possible policies the filesystem can follow: either a space-efficient method that is more likely to require moving data when a file expands, or a time-efficient method that will create new fragments more often. FreeBSD can automatically shift between the two as the filesystem moves over or under a threshold "percent full" value. Solaris, I believe, needs to be explicitly changed between the two. > As mentioned though I have never seen this myself despite running very > busy mail and web servers with what must be billions of files being > created/deleted in that time. > > It certainly grabbed my attention so I thought it may be of interest to others. It's an academic curiosity, but not an issue to take into account in planning your data center. Planning your filesystem layout, however, may well be. Be well. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 19:42:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A06F16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:42:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0432C43D48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:42:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fields.fields.utoronto.ca (fields.localdomain [192.168.216.11]) by fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields 6.0) with ESMTP id j6SJguNV016879 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:42:56 -0400 Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (fields.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.11]) by fields.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields WS 6.0) with ESMTP id j6SJgt6P018086; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:42:56 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7856C51282; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:42:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:42:50 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Nikolas Britton Message-ID: <20050728194250.GA12017@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FCuugMFkClbJLl1L" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: FreeBSD - Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:42:57 -0000 --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 03:07:46PM -0500, Nikolas Britton wrote: > One more thing... Will FreeBSD 5.4 kernel modules work under 6.x? No, you have to recompile them. Kris --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC6TU6Wry0BWjoQKURAlC0AJ9SjjZS4z/LngAMD9ic+eJFAub/NwCfdLsl ixL3UPR1ebGUzTswW3+G3Gs= =WymZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 19:43:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D3216A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:43:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F4E43D49 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:43:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fields.fields.utoronto.ca (fields.localdomain [192.168.216.11]) by fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields 6.0) with ESMTP id j6SJhZNV016939 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:43:35 -0400 Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (fields.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.11]) by fields.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields WS 6.0) with ESMTP id j6SJhZ6P018142; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:43:35 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BB6B0513EA; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:43:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:43:29 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Nikolas Britton Message-ID: <20050728194329.GB12017@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7iMSBzlTiPOCCT2k" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: FreeBSD - Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:43:36 -0000 --7iMSBzlTiPOCCT2k Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 03:00:49PM -0500, Nikolas Britton wrote: > Do I always need to run 'make cleandepend' when rebuilding a kernel, > normally I build my kernels the old school way? >=20 > Is it just me or is -O2 now the default for kernel builds? What about > -Os, safe to use? Should be OK. > The kernel build failed when it tired to compile the r128drm device. Show us the error. > Is it safe to run the ULE scheduler instead of the 4BSD scheduler, ULE > is commented out in the default kernel? ULE still has known bugs, particularly on SMP or with PREEMPTION enabled. Kris --7iMSBzlTiPOCCT2k Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC6TVgWry0BWjoQKURAv50AKDHdjt4WprRyEMzwcV5v5mJS7+7cQCfeGqp PEz9mBHiqbFq6cvy5vIwjZQ= =i68n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7iMSBzlTiPOCCT2k-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 19:44:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63DD16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:44:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A53A43D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:44:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fields.fields.utoronto.ca (fields.localdomain [192.168.216.11]) by fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields 6.0) with ESMTP id j6SJibNV017043 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:44:38 -0400 Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (fields.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.11]) by fields.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields WS 6.0) with ESMTP id j6SJib6P018226; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:44:37 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DB5545128C; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:44:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:44:31 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Nikolas Britton Message-ID: <20050728194431.GC12017@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TiqCXmo5T1hvSQQg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: FreeBSD - Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:44:39 -0000 --TiqCXmo5T1hvSQQg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 03:33:55PM -0500, Nikolas Britton wrote: > At boot up I get these errors / warnings: > "kenv: unable to get dumpdev" How are you setting up your dumpdev? Show us your config. > "no such user: _dhcp, falling back to "nobody"" >=20 > I left groups and master.passwd files to deal with later in > mergemaster and then I manually added the dhcp user to both of those > files but the system still can't find him. _dhcp, not dhcp. Kris --TiqCXmo5T1hvSQQg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC6TWfWry0BWjoQKURAgE4AJ9gvodkO/4ySzBvENTeV8NVDA9U5gCg+T2q xO9TfqmlULlJFiv8NnVA1tc= =+xw3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TiqCXmo5T1hvSQQg-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 19:44:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D156816A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:44:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bettan@nerim.net) Received: from kraid.nerim.net (smtp-104-thursday.nerim.net [62.4.16.104]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD1243D4C for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:44:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bettan@nerim.net) Received: from danielle (linux-win.org [62.212.96.206]) by kraid.nerim.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 52C4540E24; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:44:37 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <014201c593ac$ca6ebc80$0301a8c0@danielle> From: "cell" To: References: <003f01c5939f$20a53bf0$0301a8c0@danielle> <1122577669.84295.8.camel@localhost> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:44:38 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Samba over VPN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:44:41 -0000 The VPN network is look like http://www.linux-win.org/reseau.png ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Haulmark" To: "cell" Cc: Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 9:07 PM Subject: Re: Samba over VPN > On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 20:06 +0200, cell wrote: >> Hello , i have created a VPN ( with openvpn-2.0_3 on freebsd 5.4 ) >> between my network who has a gateway on freebsd 5.4 and others computer >> on win xp, and a network who has windows xp home as gateway.Windows xp >> home gateway used openvpn 2 too and i have created a bridge in my freebsd >> gateway and the windows xp gateway have created a bridge too.Now , i have >> configured samba on my freebsd gateway and i must see normally (in my >> computers on windows xp ) the windows xp gateway of the other network in >> my workgroup but i just see this computer for ten minutes !!! After that >> , i don't see it any more and i don't understand why !!! Anyone have an >> idea for this problem ? >> > > > Turn on word wrap please. > > Draw a diagram of what your network looks like. > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 19:46:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CE016A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:46:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob89@eng.ufl.edu) Received: from scorpion.eng.ufl.edu (scorpion.eng.ufl.edu [128.227.116.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C06B43D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:46:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob89@eng.ufl.edu) Received: (qmail 13132 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2005 19:46:56 -0000 Received: from scanner.engnet.ufl.edu (128.227.152.221) by scorpion.eng.ufl.edu with SMTP; 28 Jul 2005 19:46:56 -0000 From: Bob Johnson Organization: UF College of Engineering To: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:46:55 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200507281157.42688.bob89@eng.ufl.edu> <44ll3qu4v3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44ll3qu4v3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507281546.56214.bob89@eng.ufl.edu> Cc: Victor Semionov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:46:58 -0000 On Thursday 28 July 2005 03:07 pm, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Bob Johnson writes: > > From: Victor Semionov [...] > > > Why is it unnecessary to defragment UFS? > > > > In normal use, files never become fragmented enough to affect > > performance. In a (loose) sense, files are intentionally fragmented in a > > controlled way so that fragmentation doesn't cause problems. If you run > > fsck on a partition, you will typically see fragmentation levels of less > > than one percent. > > Careful, there; "fragmentation" on a UFS is measuring a completely > different thing than the same term applied to a Microsoft filesystem. > For UFS, it refers to non-contiguous free blocks (fragments, > actually), as opposed to the Microsoft terminology, where it refers to > non-contiguous blocks within the same file. > > Everything you are saying is correct, but it will confuse people who > don't realize the difference. Yeah, I was trying to keep a long response from getting even longer. And I didn't really know what fsck is measuring when it reports fragmentation, so I got lazy and glossed over it instead of digging up the information. Thanks for keeping me honest, - Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 20:40:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D0E16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:40:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from davemac11@yahoo.com) Received: from web32812.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32812.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FFD743D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:40:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from davemac11@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 71442 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Jul 2005 20:40:32 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ThngE0oYxHdpoTHwO51uSP10j3q/1iQQuyY7AhN9Vyhai1c5kuIQ1LDCwdUgyBvfxLxClXzcogZTQKFX+h+5Y7QDR30uGUtJhC9PMfEw2V43kHQBjhzu4zrOeT62YSgoHIiZZYG4sWrQuIU3B+fsGFN9wQcPf/2drn700Zee+x8= ; Message-ID: <20050728204032.71440.qmail@web32812.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [168.91.4.66] by web32812.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:40:32 PDT Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:40:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Dave McCammon To: "Gary W. Swearingen" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <3tll3tystl.l3t@mail.opusnet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Can someone clarify ipfw's in/out/recv/xmit/via concepts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:40:33 -0000 --- "Gary W. Swearingen" wrote: > I see in another msg that I'm not the only one > scratching my head over > the ipfw manpage's explanation of > in/out/recv/xmit/via concepts. I've > spent many hours reading that manpage and working on > my rc.firewall > (and it seems to work OK, based on the logging), but > I can't figure > out what it's trying to tell me, even with that nice > ASCII art. > > (I hope your replies will help me get some > clarifications into the > manpage.) > > ^ to upper layers v > | | > +----------->-----------+ > ^ v > [ip_input] [ip_output] > net.inet.ip.fw.enable=1 > | | > ^ v > [ether_demux] [ether_output_frame] > net.link.ether.ipfw=1 > | | > +-->--[bdg_forward]-->--+ > net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw=1 > ^ v > | to devices | > + + > > FROM BOTH TO BOTH > NICS? NICS? > > Here's a pic of my firewall: > > +------------------------------+ > | +-------------------------+ | > | | KERNEL | | > | +-------------------------+ | > | | | | | | > | v ^ v ^ | > | | | | | | > | +-----+ +-----+ | > | | NIC | FW | NIC | | > | +-----+ +-----+ | > | | | | | | > +------------------------------+ > | | | | > v ^ v ^ > | | | | > > WAN LAN > > The manpage says we have incoming and outgoing > packets. > In and out of what? NIC or kernel or ipfw or > computer? > > The manpage describes: > recv | xmit | via {ifX | if* | ipno | any} > > Is my "de0" an "ifX" or an "if*"? > ("exact name" or "device name") > > What would be an example of the other? > > Does "ipno" mean an numerical Internet address? > (It's not mentioned elsewhere in the manpage.) > > Does each of my NICs have both of the manpage's xmit > and recv > interfaces, or is one an xmit and one a recv for any > one packet rule? > > If an incoming packet can be associated with an xmit > interface, why > can't an outgoing packet be associated with a recv > interface? > > P.S. > > It seems that some people do their blocking of > packets > going from LAN to WAN "on" (so to speak) the LAN > interface, some on > the WAN interface, and some on both. It doesn't > seem to make much > difference on a pure firewall, except for > rule-writing convenience. > Right? > > I suppose it would be best to put blocks everywhere > possible > or at least "where" the packets enter the computer. > Right? > > Help!! > > Here is a link to a thread that help me to understand the in/out/recv/xmit stuff. http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc/tree/browse_frm/thread/240d22a55265689/4bb2dd91a376fa6c?rnum=1&hl=en&_done=%2Fgroup%2Fcomp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F240d22a55265689%2F2c14cdd252d01ff2%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26rnum%3D4%26prev%3D%2Fgroups%3Fq%3Dipfw%2Bout%2Brecv%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26selm%3D3B5E86C8.8438BEE7%2540amit.cz%26rnum%3D4%26#doc_8d3d7ceea76d1cca ok kind of long ...do a search in google groups using- Why is there a "out recv" interface spec in ipfw? ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 20:52:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4FC416A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:52:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bryan.maynard@reallm.com) Received: from hosting.sourcit.net (mail3.eitsolutions.net [68.23.20.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9839C43D55 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:52:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bryan.maynard@reallm.com) Received: (qmail 16043 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2005 15:52:49 -0500 Received: from al1-24.207.169.154.charter-stl.com (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (24.207.169.154) by hosting.sourcit.net with SMTP; 28 Jul 2005 15:52:48 -0500 From: Bryan Maynard Organization: Sofos Nikitis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:51:50 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <20050727144308.99544.qmail@web61214.mail.yahoo.com> <20050727103809.I87833@makeworld.com> <200507281356.01019.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <200507281356.01019.kirk@strauser.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507281551.51165.bryan.maynard@reallm.com> Subject: Re: huh? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:52:53 -0000 On Thursday 28 July 2005 06:55 pm, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Wednesday 27 July 2005 10:39, Chris wrote: > > > Do you have curses like "cisco rhce msce CCNA" , maybe > > > for free ? > > YOU - are an idiot... Read the list name... FreeBSD Questions... > I think he meant to ask, "are there FreeBSD certifications similar to > RHCE, MSCE, etc.?", which is a perfectly legitimate question. Don't > be so quick to anger. Thank you for saying that. I'd actually be interested in FreeBSD certification. I've learned a lot, but there's still so much I don't know :-) Thanks, Bryan -- Open Source: by the people, for the people. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 21:13:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE60816A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:13:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@sigd.net) Received: from ms05.mailstreet2003.net (MS05.mailstreet2003.net [63.251.155.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E0543D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:13:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@sigd.net) Received: from 216.253.190.66 ([216.253.190.66]) by ms05.mailstreet2003.net ([10.0.25.5]) via Exchange Front-End Server owa.mailstreet2003.net ([10.0.25.4]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:13:20 +0000 Received: from home.sigd.net by owa.mailstreet2003.net; 28 Jul 2005 16:12:13 -0500 From: Chris Haulmark To: cell In-Reply-To: <014201c593ac$ca6ebc80$0301a8c0@danielle> References: <003f01c5939f$20a53bf0$0301a8c0@danielle> <1122577669.84295.8.camel@localhost> <014201c593ac$ca6ebc80$0301a8c0@danielle> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:12:12 -0500 Message-Id: <1122585132.84295.12.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Samba over VPN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: chris@sigd.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:13:34 -0000 On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 15:44 -0400, cell wrote: > The VPN network is look like http://www.linux-win.org/reseau.png Which of those machines are configured to be a bridge device? Please don't top post. Reply under the original poster's lines. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 21:20:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F4C16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:20:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard-seibert@suscom.net) Received: from smtp4.suscom.net (smtp4.suscom.net [64.78.119.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B46F43D48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:20:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard-seibert@suscom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756C915018F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:20:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp4.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19746-01-34 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:20:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from Gerard.suscom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp4.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 387BD150149 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:20:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:20:21 -0400 (Eastern Standard Time) From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: X-X-Sender: beerstud@spamcop.net@mail.cesmail.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: MySQL - Cannot access as root X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gerard Seibert List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:20:25 -0000 I have just installed MySQL 5. I can access the program as a regular user, but not as root. As I regular user I have no privileges. If I attempt to access as root, I receive this error message. ERROR 1045 (28000) Access denied for user 'root'@'localhost' (using password: NO) I can access the program as root using: mysql -u root -p and then supplying a password at the prompt, but that is about it. What can I do to correct this problem? I tried deleting the entire package and reinstalling it, but the problem continues. When I first installed the program, it worked, but only one time. Obviously, I did something, but I do not know what. -- Gerard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 21:36:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCFB516A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:36:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@math.ku.dk) Received: from imf.math.ku.dk (fw.math.ku.dk [130.225.103.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE2643D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:36:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@math.ku.dk) Received: from imf.math.ku.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imf.math.ku.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78CF1B2E8 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:36:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from shannon.math.ku.dk (shannon.math.ku.dk [130.225.103.12]) by imf.math.ku.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:36:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:36:29 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=C3=B8rgaard?= To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Subject: Dead disk? READ_DMA Failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:36:34 -0000 Hi, Please read on although this is a long one... I might panic and coredump myself if I don't get this fixed. I have a one year old Hitachi Travelstar 60GB/4200RPM disk. This night and since then, I get these errors: ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=48926527 ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=48926527 ad0: FAILURE - READ_DMA timed out or ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=50299455 ad0: FAILURE - READ_DMA status=51 error=40 LBA=50299455 The LBA number varies, but otherwise it is consistent. Eventually the device is removed from /dev and no disk is accessible, although mount shows mounted devices. I have booted in single user mode and run fsck manually multiple times to correct all found errors, most errors are on /, /usr and some on /var, yet the problem reappears. I have tried to reinstall, toggling newfs to recreate /, /usr and /var hoping that any bad blocks or sectors would be removed or marked unusable. But the problem remains. Is there a way I can reformat or fix the disk so that broken areas will not be used again? Please, how far from the grave are my data? Any suggestion on which new drive to choose? I have looked at Western Digital Scorpio WD600VE 60 GB. Given the mentioned error, does this indicate an error that would be covered by standard guarantee? after all the disk is just one year old... The system: FreeBSD 5.4, Epia Mini-ITX CL1000, 256MB RAM, 60 GB HDD. Thanks, Erik GnuPG: http://www.locolomo.org/home/norgaard/norgaard.gpg.asc pub 1024D/11D11F9E 2003-08-15 Erik Norgaard Key fingerprint = C394 81C4 D137 EEE5 39BE 82D5 3E6B FB3E 11D1 1F9E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 21:40:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 033F116A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:40:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9505243D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:40:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCACA24C64 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:40:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02229-01 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:40:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-224-176-51.eastlink.ca [24.224.176.51]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C3AA24C63 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:40:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5615B4859B; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:40:50 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5549348596 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:40:50 -0300 (ADT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:40:50 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050728183517.O43872@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Subject: Determine processing holding open a 52+Gig file ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:40:50 -0000 'k, this is the second time its happened ... on a file system that is currently 35% full (52G free), all the disk space disappeared ... Is there a way of finding out what process is holding open this "immense" file? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 21:43:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F40416A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:43:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52EA843D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:43:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from [206.255.31.21] (helo=yoda.datawok.com) by smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1DyGAS-0004nH-Mu; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:43:52 -0400 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Gerard Seibert Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:45:15 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200507281645.15965.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69563f9fea00a6dd62bc078dff121a13472b37ba3f8ce7e77977350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 206.255.31.21 Cc: Subject: Re: MySQL - Cannot access as root X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:43:53 -0000 On Thursday 28 July 2005 04:20 pm, Gerard Seibert wrote: > I have just installed MySQL 5. I can access the program as a regular > user, but not as root. As I regular user I have no privileges. If I > attempt to access as root, I receive this error message. > > ERROR 1045 (28000) Access denied for user 'root'@'localhost' (using > password: NO) > > I can access the program as root using: mysql -u root -p and then > supplying a password at the prompt, but that is about it. > > What can I do to correct this problem? I tried deleting the entire > package and reinstalling it, but the problem continues. When I first > installed the program, it worked, but only one time. Obviously, I did > something, but I do not know what. The system root user is separate from MySQL's root user. The system root user should not be able to access the database server directly. I think this is true for both MySQL and PostgreSQL. If you can log in using 'mysql -u root -p [password]', then everything is okay to start. It's not that you did something wrong, rather you haven't finished setting up the database for your user. Database servers aren't like gui text editors. It's important that you read the documentation. Here are some helpful links: Start here for your immediate needs: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/default-privileges.html Manual Index: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/index.html MySQL Tutorial: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/tutorial.html Best of luck, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 21:46:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4292F16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:46:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmacpherson@mainframe.ca) Received: from wale.mainframe.ca (wale.mainframe.ca [209.17.131.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0847243D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:46:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmacpherson@mainframe.ca) Received: from jupiter.mainframe.ca ([10.0.0.12] helo=mail.mainframe.ca) by wale.mainframe.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1DyGDI-0004Ta-JB for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:46:48 -0700 Received: from [172.16.139.102] (helo=Mandarin-04.mainframe.ca) by mail.mainframe.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1DyGBR-000P60-8T for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:44:53 -0700 From: Derrick MacPherson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Mainframe Entertainment Inc Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:46:47 -0700 Message-Id: <1122587208.11336.23.camel@Mandarin-04.mainframe.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-16) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Freebsd testing with squid. User authentication works, now trying to get group based auth X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:46:49 -0000 as the subject says, when I try to test group auth, I get: /usr/local/libexec/squid/wb_group -d /wb_group[19095](wb_check_group.c:344): External ACL winbindd group helper build Jul 27 2005, 17:33:37 starting up... /wb_group[19095](wb_check_group.c:308): Can't contact winbindd. Dying proxy1# ps -axu|grep win root 18826 0.0 0.4 7100 4224 ?? Ss 9:21AM 0:00.05 /usr/local/sbin/winbindd root 18827 0.0 0.4 6044 3720 ?? I 9:21AM 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/winbindd Where can I start checking? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 21:48:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E589616A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:48:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B7943D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:48:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6SLmRTp005339 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:48:28 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050728144412.1c912310@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:44:44 -0700 To: "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <20050728183517.O43872@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20050728183517.O43872@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: Determine processing holding open a 52+Gig file ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:48:30 -0000 At 02:40 PM 7/28/2005, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >'k, this is the second time its happened ... on a file system that is >currently 35% full (52G free), all the disk space disappeared ... Are you out of inodes? df -i >Is there a way of finding out what process is holding open this "immense" >file? fstat will give you that info. -Glenn >---- >Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) >Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 21:49:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4204E16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:49:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from zhonka1.zhonka.net (zhonka1.zhonka.net [66.228.195.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC9243D49 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:49:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from wolf.pjkh.com ([66.228.196.74]) by zhonka1.zhonka.net (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-58414U4500L450S0V35) with ESMTP id net; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:49:53 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879B758C7; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:49:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wolf.pjkh.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wolf.pjkh.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67831-02; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:49:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5588958C6; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:49:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6C954BF; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:49:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:49:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Philip Hallstrom To: "Marc G. Fournier" In-Reply-To: <20050728183517.O43872@ganymede.hub.org> Message-ID: <20050728144620.A67924@wolf.pjkh.com> References: <20050728183517.O43872@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at pjkh.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Determine processing holding open a 52+Gig file ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:49:54 -0000 > 'k, this is the second time its happened ... on a file system that is > currently 35% full (52G free), all the disk space disappeared ... > > Is there a way of finding out what process is holding open this "immense" > file? I'm pretty sure lsof can tell you... either just plain "lsof" or maybe with the directory name... # lsof +D /tmp COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME postgres 66218 postgres 5u unix 0xd9c93680 0t0 /tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432 sshd 66325 greg 7u unix 0xd9d02800 0t0 /tmp/ssh-xIDIHoLn/agent.66325 +D D This option causes lsof to search for all open instances of directory D and all the files and directories it contains to its complete depth. Processing of the +D option does not follow symbolic links within D unless the -x or -x l option is also specified. Nor does it search for open files on file system mount points on subdirectories of D unless the -x or -x f option is also specified. Note: the authority of the user of this option limits it to searching for files that the user has permission to examine with the system stat(2) function. Further note: lsof may process this option slowly and require a large amount of dynamic memory to do it. This is because it must descend the entire directory tree, rooted at D, calling stat(2) for each file and directory, building a list of all the files it finds, and searching that list for a match with every open file. When directory D is large, these steps can take a long time, so use this option prudently. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 22:17:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C7316A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:17:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nullpt@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0A243D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:17:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nullpt@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so504982wra for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:17:04 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=jSMNDHsP7uZbDM8Vaxf2cWyihzxHrJCtdOA8vc3Xdlg/GXYWuVZHG1UJAgWP/JsMFJX0/RnuyyQXc420inhLLxZADtc8bAV/KXYr5AM+8mlgDWRJw+pW42yN2+pnTrxXDjl1D1Fh2Xn9xEpCSYA3uOMKG9btwhvjlzTqWpDQYJI= Received: by 10.54.28.73 with SMTP id b73mr1004328wrb; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:17:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:17:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <755cb9fc05072815171ac8003@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:17:03 +0100 From: Alexandre Vieira To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Sendmail help needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alexandre Vieira List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:17:05 -0000 Hello folks, I'm trying to get past a standard in sendmail which is very simple.=20 I have several machines reporting mails trough local MTA's (sendmail) in each one of the boxes to our main mailserver. The thing is, I did not developed the scripts and they are using "mailx -s user" which normally would try to deliver it to a local account in the machine. So the question is: Can I, in any way, define that every "user" passed on the mailx in every script gets resolved to user@somedomain.tld and not to a local system account? We have hundreds of "names" in the scripts, so aliasing doesn't work for me. My current hack is defining DR and DS in the sendmail.cf to a static hostname but that takes redundancy to our mail system since if the main mailserver is down the backup mail server (higher MX) won't take any effect. Any help apreciated Cheers From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 22:25:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8435316A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:25:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E082943D49 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:25:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from pooh.nagual.st (pooh.nagual.st [192.168.11.22]) by nagual.st with esmtp; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:25:44 +0200 id 00000018.42E95B68.0000FC50 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:26:02 +0200 From: dick hoogendijk To: fbsdq Message-Id: <20050729002602.65ff60bb.dick@nagual.st> Organization: de nagual X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: need some advice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:25:51 -0000 I have the chance to buy a new computer. It will take a long time before I can do this again. My options are: Athlon64-3000+ (Newcastle) on a MSI K8T NEO-FSR board (1Gb 3200 mem) Athlon64-3400+ (Clawhammer on the same board Intel Prescott 3.4Mhz on a Intel 915p board (1024 Mb DDRII pc4300 memory) Is there much difference between the athlon3000/3400 ?? Will the intel platform have (dis)advantages ? I will run FreebSD on it (compile a lot of ports) and (windows-xp/98se) for gaming. Price is important. I.e. buying the athlon3000 gives me the opportunity to buy something else, BUT if the speed of the 3400+ is much better, I can buy that "other stuff" later.. if you see what I mean. I just want a machine that last a litthle longer... I.e. the intel MB has a PCIe grahics slot. How important is that (or not). I will buy a Geforce-6600GT videocard (offer most for less money..) Any advice is welcome. -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 22:48:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A4716A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:48:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2753043D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:48:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6SMmqP5006608 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:48:53 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050728153729.156ff2d0@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:45:08 -0700 To: Alexandre Vieira , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <755cb9fc05072815171ac8003@mail.gmail.com> References: <755cb9fc05072815171ac8003@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: Sendmail help needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:48:54 -0000 At 03:17 PM 7/28/2005, Alexandre Vieira wrote: >Hello folks, > >I'm trying to get past a standard in sendmail which is very simple. > >I have several machines reporting mails trough local MTA's (sendmail) >in each one of the boxes to our main mailserver. The thing is, I did >not developed the scripts and they are using "mailx -s user" >which normally would try to deliver it to a local account in the >machine. So the question is: Can I, in any way, define that every >"user" passed on the mailx in every script gets resolved to >user@somedomain.tld and not to a local system account? We have >hundreds of "names" in the scripts, so aliasing doesn't work for me. If you don't _ever_ want things to be delivered locally, you can create what sendmail calls a null client. That will send all mail to the address you specify. You can get more details from /usr/share/sendmail/cf/README -Glenn >My current hack is defining DR and DS in the sendmail.cf to a static >hostname but that takes redundancy to our mail system since if the >main mailserver is down the backup mail server (higher MX) won't take >any effect. > >Any help apreciated >Cheers >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 22:52:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE74B16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:52:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpk@dpk.net) Received: from shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net [207.246.149.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE41043D8D for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:52:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpk@dpk.net) Received: from shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6SMq9rR059911; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:52:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dpk@localhost) by shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id j6SMq8FU059906; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:52:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net: dpk owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:52:08 -0700 (PDT) From: dpk X-X-Sender: dpk@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net To: Giorgos Keramidas In-Reply-To: <20050721100327.GA16179@beatrix.daedalusnetworks.priv> Message-ID: <20050728154356.A79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> References: <20050719145822.W23753@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <441x5tk3e9.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20050720064637.Q23753@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <20050721100327.GA16179@beatrix.daedalusnetworks.priv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large filesystem woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:52:32 -0000 On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > Are you trying to start from scratch, or just making changes to the > existing table? If it's the second, then try the -u option: > > # fdisk -u /dev/da0 > > This should give you a chance to interactively change the partition > table of the disk. If this fails too, please show us the exact command > line you used and the exact error messages. > > - Giorgos Unfortunately I can't run fdisk -u, if that command will wipe out the partition table, since / is also on the array, just in a smaller partition. I found this page: http://www.freebsd.org/projects/bigdisk/ It was last updated in January. Has there been more progress on this front? I wonder if this is all a known problem, and I just overlooked it because of my understanding that UFS2 is supposed to handle large partitions. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 22:57:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED2616A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:57:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from nic.ach.sch.gr (nic.sch.gr [194.63.238.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453E843D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:57:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (qmail 21112 invoked by uid 207); 28 Jul 2005 22:57:06 -0000 Received: from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr by nic by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.21 (sophie: 3.04/2.19/3.81. Clear:RC:1(81.186.70.3):. Processed in 0.629171 secs); 28 Jul 2005 22:57:06 -0000 Received: from dialup3.ach.sch.gr (HELO gothmog.gr) ([81.186.70.3]) (envelope-sender ) by nic.sch.gr (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 28 Jul 2005 22:57:05 -0000 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6SMv2Cr051222; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:57:02 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6SMv2Cw051205; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:57:02 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:57:01 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: dpk Message-ID: <20050728225701.GB46755@gothmog.gr> References: <20050719145822.W23753@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <441x5tk3e9.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20050720064637.Q23753@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <20050721100327.GA16179@beatrix.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20050728154356.A79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050728154356.A79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> Cc: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large filesystem woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:57:09 -0000 On 2005-07-28 15:52, dpk wrote: >On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> Are you trying to start from scratch, or just making changes to the >> existing table? If it's the second, then try the -u option: >> >> # fdisk -u /dev/da0 >> >> This should give you a chance to interactively change the partition >> table of the disk. If this fails too, please show us the exact command >> line you used and the exact error messages. > > Unfortunately I can't run fdisk -u, if that command will wipe out the > partition table, since / is also on the array, just in a smaller > partition. It won't wipe away the table. It will just let you edit the existing table interactively, through a series of questions like: - Do you want to edit partition 1? - Do you want to edit partition 2? - Do you want to edit partition 3? - Do you want to edit partition 4? - Do you want to change the active partition? - Do you want to save your changes to the disk? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 22:58:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA3516A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:58:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benlutz@datacomm.ch) Received: from maxlor.mine.nu (c-213-160-32-54.customer.ggaweb.ch [213.160.32.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3251343D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:58:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benlutz@datacomm.ch) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE0F37E; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:58:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maxlor.mine.nu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (midgard [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23778-06; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:58:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.0.0.23] (mini.intranet [10.0.0.23]) by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10BB7F7; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:58:34 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E96319.3080901@datacomm.ch> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:58:33 +0200 From: Benjamin Lutz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dick hoogendijk References: <20050729002602.65ff60bb.dick@nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <20050729002602.65ff60bb.dick@nagual.st> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig92B40681F30B4E07AD192705" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at maxlor.mine.nu Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: need some advice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:58:36 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig92B40681F30B4E07AD192705 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit dick hoogendijk wrote: > Is there much difference between the athlon3000/3400 ?? > Will the intel platform have (dis)advantages ? Well, the 3400+ will be slightly faster when it comes to number crunching. They'll be up to par to the Intel chip, but the Intel system will cost more. If price is important, why not go for a Sempron 3100+ using the Palermo core? Granted, it's a bit slower than the Athlon64 3000+, but it does have an advantage: Under load, it outputs 62W of heat instead of 89W like the 130nm Athlon64 cores. And of course it only costs half of what the Athlon64s cost. > Price is important. I.e. buying the athlon3000 gives me the opportunity > to buy something else, BUT if the speed of the 3400+ is much better, I > can buy that "other stuff" later.. if you see what I mean. I just want a > machine that last a litthle longer... You'll have to figure out the sweet spot for yourself really... there are benchmarks available on the web. > I.e. the intel MB has a PCIe grahics slot. How important is that (or > not). I will buy a Geforce-6600GT videocard (offer most for less > money..) At the moment, Gaming GFX cards are being released for both PCIe and AGP, so AGP means no loss yet. By the time you'll get a new GFX card, you'll probably want to upgrade your CPU as well anyway, which means upgrading the mainboard... --------------enig92B40681F30B4E07AD192705 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iD8DBQFC6WMcgShs4qbRdeQRAlxMAJ4nk8vQGuN/XPkKTxCqFGnCPWTEzQCdFJ2g 9xBT84h8lCKPYfSPsAB0ONE= =cd8S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig92B40681F30B4E07AD192705-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 23:01:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCAF16A425 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:01:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF2E43D48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:01:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from dante68.u.washington.edu (dante68.u.washington.edu [140.142.15.49]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.4+UW05.04/8.13.4+UW05.05) with ESMTP id j6SN1BYZ029347 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:01:11 -0700 Received: from localhost (youshi10@localhost) by dante68.u.washington.edu (8.13.4+UW05.03/8.13.4+UW05.07) with ESMTP id j6SN1BE0037372; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:01:11 -0700 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:01:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Garrett Cooper To: dick hoogendijk In-Reply-To: <20050729002602.65ff60bb.dick@nagual.st> Message-ID: References: <20050729002602.65ff60bb.dick@nagual.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: fbsdq Subject: Re: need some advice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:01:13 -0000 On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, dick hoogendijk wrote: > I have the chance to buy a new computer. It will take a long time before > I can do this again. > > My options are: > > Athlon64-3000+ (Newcastle) on a MSI K8T NEO-FSR board (1Gb 3200 mem) > Athlon64-3400+ (Clawhammer on the same board > > Intel Prescott 3.4Mhz on a Intel 915p board (1024 Mb DDRII pc4300 > memory) > > Is there much difference between the athlon3000/3400 ?? > Will the intel platform have (dis)advantages ? > > I will run FreebSD on it (compile a lot of ports) and (windows-xp/98se) > for gaming. > > Price is important. I.e. buying the athlon3000 gives me the opportunity > to buy something else, BUT if the speed of the 3400+ is much better, I > can buy that "other stuff" later.. if you see what I mean. I just want a > machine that last a litthle longer... > > I.e. the intel MB has a PCIe grahics slot. How important is that (or > not). I will buy a Geforce-6600GT videocard (offer most for less > money..) > > Any advice is welcome. > > -- > dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE > ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 > + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja Wha?!?! Win98?!?! are you insane? The only thing I could see justifying that would be playing PSX games with bleem (since it was only supported on 98), and that's it. Not only that, 98 wasn't built with today's hardware, so all in all it will be EXCEPTIONALLY slow performance wise. Heh. I remember running win98 on a faster P3 and the fact that it was so horribly slow. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 23:04:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8B816A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:04:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpk@dpk.net) Received: from shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net [207.246.149.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9EB643D48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:04:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpk@dpk.net) Received: from shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6SN4KrR063374; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:04:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dpk@localhost) by shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id j6SN4Ks8063370; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:04:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net: dpk owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:04:20 -0700 (PDT) From: dpk X-X-Sender: dpk@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net To: Giorgos Keramidas In-Reply-To: <20050728225701.GB46755@gothmog.gr> Message-ID: <20050728155804.T79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> References: <20050719145822.W23753@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <441x5tk3e9.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20050720064637.Q23753@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <20050721100327.GA16179@beatrix.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20050728154356.A79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <20050728225701.GB46755@gothmog.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large filesystem woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:04:32 -0000 On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > It won't wipe away the table. It will just let you edit the existing > table interactively, through a series of questions like: > > - Do you want to edit partition 1? > - Do you want to edit partition 2? > - Do you want to edit partition 3? > - Do you want to edit partition 4? > - Do you want to change the active partition? > - Do you want to save your changes to the disk? # df -k Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/da0s1a 35082074 1147642 31127868 4% / devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc # fdisk -u fdisk: cannot open disk /dev/da0: No such file or directory # ls -ald /dev/da0* crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 12 Jul 28 15:56 /dev/da0 crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 13 Jul 28 15:56 /dev/da0s1 crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 18 Jul 28 08:56 /dev/da0s1a crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 19 Jul 28 15:56 /dev/da0s1b crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 20 Jul 28 15:56 /dev/da0s1c truss indicates that fdisk may be getting the error from somewhere else: stat("/dev/da0",0xbfbfeb30) = 0 (0x0) open("/dev/da0",0x2,00) ERR#1 'Operation not permitted' open("/dev/da0",0x0,027757765630) = 6 (0x6) open("/dev/da0s1",0x2,01001210100) ERR#1 'Operation not permitted' open("/dev/da0s2",0x2,01001210100) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' open("/dev/da0s3",0x2,01001210100) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' open("/dev/da0s4",0x2,01001210100) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' Because it is using devfs, I'm not able to create these missing slices in /dev. Most unfortunately, it appears it uses devfs in single user mode as well, so I can't test the theory. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 23:10:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A45C16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:10:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from nic.ach.sch.gr (nic.sch.gr [194.63.238.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00DD543D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:10:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (qmail 23740 invoked by uid 207); 28 Jul 2005 23:10:39 -0000 Received: from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr by nic by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.21 (sophie: 3.04/2.19/3.81. Clear:RC:1(81.186.70.3):. Processed in 0.966486 secs); 28 Jul 2005 23:10:39 -0000 Received: from dialup3.ach.sch.gr (HELO gothmog.gr) ([81.186.70.3]) (envelope-sender ) by nic.sch.gr (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 28 Jul 2005 23:10:37 -0000 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6SNAZlY062385; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:10:35 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6SNAZmr062384; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:10:35 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:10:35 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: dpk Message-ID: <20050728231035.GA60181@gothmog.gr> References: <20050719145822.W23753@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <441x5tk3e9.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20050720064637.Q23753@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <20050721100327.GA16179@beatrix.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20050728154356.A79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <20050728225701.GB46755@gothmog.gr> <20050728155804.T79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050728155804.T79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large filesystem woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:10:42 -0000 On 2005-07-28 16:04, dpk wrote: > # df -k > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/da0s1a 35082074 1147642 31127868 4% / > devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev > procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc > # fdisk -u > fdisk: cannot open disk /dev/da0: No such file or directory > # ls -ald /dev/da0* > crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 12 Jul 28 15:56 /dev/da0 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 13 Jul 28 15:56 /dev/da0s1 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 18 Jul 28 08:56 /dev/da0s1a > crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 19 Jul 28 15:56 /dev/da0s1b > crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 20 Jul 28 15:56 /dev/da0s1c > > truss indicates that fdisk may be getting the error from somewhere else: > > stat("/dev/da0",0xbfbfeb30) = 0 (0x0) > open("/dev/da0",0x2,00) ERR#1 'Operation not permitted' > open("/dev/da0",0x0,027757765630) = 6 (0x6) > open("/dev/da0s1",0x2,01001210100) ERR#1 'Operation not permitted' > open("/dev/da0s2",0x2,01001210100) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' > open("/dev/da0s3",0x2,01001210100) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' > open("/dev/da0s4",0x2,01001210100) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' > > Because it is using devfs, I'm not able to create these missing slices in > /dev. Most unfortunately, it appears it uses devfs in single user mode as > well, so I can't test the theory. Hmmm, in multiuser mode, your root filesystem is mounted as read-write and it resides in da0, so GEOM will forbid opening the disk device in read-write mode for editing the partition table. In single user mode, devfs is still used, but your root filesystem should be mounted read-only (unless you manually mount it as read-write), so fdisk -u should work. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 23:10:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E8916A425 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:10:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpk@dpk.net) Received: from shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net [207.246.149.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92E843D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:10:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpk@dpk.net) Received: from shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6SNAirR064782; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:10:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dpk@localhost) by shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id j6SNAiUC064779; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:10:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net: dpk owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:10:44 -0700 (PDT) From: dpk X-X-Sender: dpk@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net To: Giorgos Keramidas In-Reply-To: <20050728155804.T79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> Message-ID: <20050728160947.Y79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> References: <20050719145822.W23753@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <441x5tk3e9.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20050720064637.Q23753@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <20050721100327.GA16179@beatrix.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20050728154356.A79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <20050728225701.GB46755@gothmog.gr> <20050728155804.T79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large filesystem woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:10:52 -0000 On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, dpk wrote: > truss indicates that fdisk may be getting the error from somewhere else: > > stat("/dev/da0",0xbfbfeb30) = 0 (0x0) > open("/dev/da0",0x2,00) ERR#1 'Operation not permitted' > open("/dev/da0",0x0,027757765630) = 6 (0x6) > open("/dev/da0s1",0x2,01001210100) ERR#1 'Operation not permitted' > open("/dev/da0s2",0x2,01001210100) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' > open("/dev/da0s3",0x2,01001210100) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' > open("/dev/da0s4",0x2,01001210100) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' > > Because it is using devfs, I'm not able to create these missing slices in > /dev. Most unfortunately, it appears it uses devfs in single user mode as > well, so I can't test the theory. Under a chrooted shell, I created the s1-4 /dev entries. fdisk -u now reports 'Device not configured', which supports the theory that fdisk is just using whatever error it last sees and gives up. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 23:24:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2413016A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:24:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pcgeek86@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C9C43D68 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:24:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pcgeek86@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z6so305680nzd for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:24:51 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rIuUKhmqXg5se/+PpY91okf0wa/ya+nMHut5jVUZjV5vxnFAdz0EO3QPNSqM1jRvV5KUPya9ImpxypVWTqeA1d1I82iYMmSDjv9/KWTR2HmSksXgxnhpUXlQQrEnvkra36A2/21/lQjp6xo9VPAcjjhKksaMCqBDXc/LoenS0Ss= Received: by 10.36.34.20 with SMTP id h20mr1451371nzh; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:24:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.100.100.15? ([66.92.128.235]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 6sm480795nzn.2005.07.28.16.24.15; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:24:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42E96BBB.1000809@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:35:23 -0500 From: Trevor Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dick hoogendijk References: <20050729002602.65ff60bb.dick@nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <20050729002602.65ff60bb.dick@nagual.st> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: fbsdq Subject: Re: need some advice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:24:57 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 dick hoogendijk wrote: > I have the chance to buy a new computer. It will take a long time > before I can do this again. > > My options are: > > Athlon64-3000+ (Newcastle) on a MSI K8T NEO-FSR board (1Gb 3200 > mem) Athlon64-3400+ (Clawhammer on the same board > > Intel Prescott 3.4Mhz on a Intel 915p board (1024 Mb DDRII pc4300 > memory) > > Is there much difference between the athlon3000/3400 ?? Will the > intel platform have (dis)advantages ? > > I will run FreebSD on it (compile a lot of ports) and > (windows-xp/98se) for gaming. > > Price is important. I.e. buying the athlon3000 gives me the > opportunity to buy something else, BUT if the speed of the 3400+ is > much better, I can buy that "other stuff" later.. if you see what I > mean. I just want a machine that last a litthle longer... > > I.e. the intel MB has a PCIe grahics slot. How important is that > (or not). I will buy a Geforce-6600GT videocard (offer most for > less money..) > > Any advice is welcome. > I would recommend purchasing an Athlon 64 3000+ Venice core. I just picked one of these up along with 2 gigs of ram and a 6600GT and it runs sooooooo nice. Not only that, but it's cheap. Read up on the new Rev. E (Venice) chips @ http://www.techreport.com/reviews/2005q2/athlon64-venice/index.x?pg=1. Can't say I'd recommend purchasing an intel chip for desktop usage. They consume a lot of power, and that implies that they run pretty darn hot too. I avoid them at all costs. See http://www.techreport.com/reviews/2005q2/athlon64-venice/power-load.gif Trevor -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQFC6Wu7oGycRpOgdeERA5B8AKCPf2dhr6Sx04+s71Hb9uzc1f+zYwCfU6CN 21p008fkgqhsQvcRFFehTgE= =YPNN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 23:40:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D5F16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:40:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7450B43D5E for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:40:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.246.232] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id ACCF642D0020; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:39:59 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6SNex6T078225; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:40:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6SNejjp078222; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:40:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: Bryan Maynard References: <42E8E749.10904@meijome.net> <200507281039.06997.bryan.maynard@reallm.com> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:40:45 -0700 In-Reply-To: <200507281039.06997.bryan.maynard@reallm.com> (Bryan Maynard's message of "Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:39:06 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backup kernel - confirmation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:40:06 -0000 Bryan Maynard writes: > Yes, you can do that. Also of note is that when FreeBSD compiles a > kernel it takes the old kernel and renames it kernel.old. When FreeBSD > is booting you can select which kernel to use simpy by entering > "boot /boot/kernel.old/kernel" or "boot /boot/kernel_orig/kernel". I > did this when I was tweak the kernel in my laptop. Check the boot man > page for more info. I'm getting the Handbook changed on this subject just now. When the standard make scripts are _installing_ a kernel (and modules) in 5.x, It only renames kernel -> kernel.old if your most recent boot used kernel; it overwrites kernel if you booted with kernel.old or kernel.GENERIC, etc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 23:40:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2911116A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:40:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpk@dpk.net) Received: from shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net [207.246.149.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE7E43D6D for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:40:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpk@dpk.net) Received: from shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6SNefrR070102; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:40:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dpk@localhost) by shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id j6SNef0Y070099; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:40:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net: dpk owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:40:41 -0700 (PDT) From: dpk X-X-Sender: dpk@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net To: Giorgos Keramidas In-Reply-To: <20050728231035.GA60181@gothmog.gr> Message-ID: <20050728161608.Q79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> References: <20050719145822.W23753@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <441x5tk3e9.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20050720064637.Q23753@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <20050721100327.GA16179@beatrix.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20050728154356.A79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <20050728225701.GB46755@gothmog.gr> <20050728155804.T79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <20050728231035.GA60181@gothmog.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large filesystem woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:40:47 -0000 On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > Hmmm, in multiuser mode, your root filesystem is mounted as read-write > and it resides in da0, so GEOM will forbid opening the disk device in > read-write mode for editing the partition table. > > In single user mode, devfs is still used, but your root filesystem > should be mounted read-only (unless you manually mount it as > read-write), so fdisk -u should work. I've remounted the disk readonly, and was still seeing the same errors. I've looked at the fdisk source and compared it to the truss output. ... /* rwmode is O_RDWR due to -u */ fd = open(disk, rwmode); ... /* errno is EPERM here, from truss */ if (fd == -1 && errno == ENXIO) return -2; if (fd == -1 && errno == EPERM && rwmode == O_RDWR) { ... /* this is successful: */ fd = open(disk, O_RDONLY); ... /* the following opens get device not configured, or no such file or directory under normal operation, from truss */ for (p = 1; p < 5; p++) { asprintf(&s, "%ss%d", disk, p); fdw = open(s, O_RDONLY); free(s); if (fdw == -1) continue; break; } ... /* ah ha! open_disk is returning -4 because the last slice had some error */ if (fdw == -1) return -4; This change was introduced with version 1.67 of the fdisk.c file. Commenting out if (fdw == -1) return -4; allows fdisk -u to function. Here are the results, not changing anything: # ./fdisk -u ******* Working on device /dev/da0 ******* parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=534921 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1 parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: cylinders=534921 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Do you want to change our idea of what BIOS thinks ? [n] Media sector size is 512 Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 Information from DOS bootblock is: The data for partition 1 is: sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 63, size 75489372 (36860 Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63 Do you want to change it? [n] The data for partition 2 is: Do you want to change it? [n] The data for partition 3 is: Do you want to change it? [n] The data for partition 4 is: Do you want to change it? [n] Partition 1 is marked active Do you want to change the active partition? [n] Here are the results of ./fdisk -u when trying to add the second partition: # ./fdisk -u ******* Working on device /dev/da0 ******* parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=534921 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1 parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: cylinders=534921 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Do you want to change our idea of what BIOS thinks ? [n] n Media sector size is 512 Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 Information from DOS bootblock is: The data for partition 1 is: sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 63, size 75489372 (36860 Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63 Do you want to change it? [n] n The data for partition 2 is: Do you want to change it? [n] y Supply a decimal value for "sysid (165=FreeBSD)" [0] 165 Supply a decimal value for "start" [0] Supply a decimal value for "size" [0] fdisk: ERROR: size of partition is zero fdisk: ERROR: failed to adjust; setting sysid to 0 Explicitly specify beg/end address ? [n] y Supply a decimal value for "beginning cylinder" [0] 1024 Supply a decimal value for "beginning head" [0] Supply a decimal value for "beginning sector" [0] Supply a decimal value for "ending cylinder" [0] 534921 Supply a decimal value for "ending head" [0] 254 Supply a decimal value for "ending sector" [0] 63 sysid 0 (0000),(unused) start 0, size 0 (0 Meg), flag 0 beg: cyl 0/ head 0/ sector 0; end: cyl 393/ head 254/ sector 63 Writing it fails, but I didn't really expect it to succeed with the above values. There's some overflowing going on. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 23:41:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E4916A420 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:41:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gs_stoller@juno.com) Received: from m23.nyc.untd.com (m23.nyc.untd.com [64.136.22.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B39BD43D75 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:41:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gs_stoller@juno.com) Received: from m23.nyc.untd.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by m23.nyc.untd.com with SMTP id AABBQU5KCASZL6RJ for (sender ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:41:22 -0700 (PDT) X-UNTD-OriginStamp: /s5f1SIGSI3+WdnoYQ8yRAn5A1w0CkBozahAD1+J6XBPHFOV9v55BA== Received: (from gs_stoller@juno.com) by m23.nyc.untd.com (jqueuemail) id KY2K6U39; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:40:45 PDT To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:21:35 -0400 Message-ID: <20050728.193604.-249627.3.GS_Stoller@juno.com> X-Mailer: Juno 4.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 3,5-13 X-Juno-Att: 0 X-Juno-RefParts: 0 From: Gerald S Stoller X-ContentStamp: 5:2:812872189 X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 127.0.0.1|localhost|m23.nyc.untd.com|gs_stoller@juno.com Cc: Subject: Can't boot 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:41:40 -0000 I tried to boot FreeBSD versions 5.0 , 5.3 , and 5.4 ; all were unsuccessful. I was told that something basic in the boot stuff was changed and my micro-processor (or BIOS , or whatever) may be out-of-date vis-a-vis the new boot process. My system's uname -a is FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE #0: Sat Apr 21 10:54:49 GMT 2001 jkh@narf.osd.bsdi.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/GENERIC i386 The booting messages were:something like (this is an old copy): Building the boot loader arguments Relocating the loader and the BTX Verifying DMI Pool Data Boot from ATAPI CD-ROM: CD Loader 1.2 Is there any way to get the new system (into a fresh slice) with a boot loader that works with my system? If not, what upgrades do I need and do you know how to go about getting them? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 00:07:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC5716A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:07:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D0243D6B for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:07:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6T07r4p008359 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:07:53 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050728170137.1be90900@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:04:07 -0700 To: Gerald S Stoller , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <20050728.193604.-249627.3.GS_Stoller@juno.com> References: <20050728.193604.-249627.3.GS_Stoller@juno.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: Can't boot 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:08:00 -0000 At 04:21 PM 7/28/2005, Gerald S Stoller wrote: > I tried to boot FreeBSD versions 5.0 , 5.3 , and 5.4 ; all were >unsuccessful. I was told that something basic in the boot stuff was >changed and my micro-processor (or BIOS , or whatever) may be >out-of-date vis-a-vis the new boot process. My system's uname -a is >FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE #0: Sat Apr 21 10:54:49 GMT 2001 > jkh@narf.osd.bsdi.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/GENERIC i386 > >The booting messages were:something like (this is an old copy): >Building the boot loader arguments >Relocating the loader and the BTX >Verifying DMI Pool Data >Boot from ATAPI CD-ROM: >CD Loader 1.2 > > Is there any way to get the new system (into a fresh slice) with > a boot >loader that works with my system? If not, what upgrades do I need and do >you know how to go about getting them? You should be able to use the boot floppies to get your system booted into sysinstall. From there you can use the CD to complete the install. -Glenn >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 00:30:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA5916A439 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:30:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from nic.ach.sch.gr (nic.sch.gr [194.63.238.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB34743D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:30:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (qmail 8016 invoked by uid 207); 29 Jul 2005 00:30:12 -0000 Received: from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr by nic by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.21 (sophie: 3.04/2.19/3.81. Clear:RC:1(81.186.70.3):. Processed in 1.575178 secs); 29 Jul 2005 00:30:12 -0000 Received: from dialup3.ach.sch.gr (HELO gothmog.gr) ([81.186.70.3]) (envelope-sender ) by nic.sch.gr (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 29 Jul 2005 00:30:09 -0000 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6T0U7ee001731; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:30:07 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6T0U5Eb001715; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:30:05 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:30:05 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: dpk Message-ID: <20050729003005.GA99178@gothmog.gr> References: <20050719145822.W23753@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <441x5tk3e9.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20050720064637.Q23753@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <20050721100327.GA16179@beatrix.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20050728154356.A79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <20050728225701.GB46755@gothmog.gr> <20050728155804.T79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <20050728231035.GA60181@gothmog.gr> <20050728161608.Q79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050728161608.Q79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large filesystem woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:30:15 -0000 Nice catch! I think you should report this to phk@ or ru@ who have been the most active in the fdisk area :-) - Giorgos On 2005-07-28 16:40, dpk wrote: > > I've remounted the disk readonly, and was still seeing the same errors. > I've looked at the fdisk source and compared it to the truss output. > > ... /* rwmode is O_RDWR due to -u */ > fd = open(disk, rwmode); > ... /* errno is EPERM here, from truss */ > if (fd == -1 && errno == ENXIO) > return -2; > if (fd == -1 && errno == EPERM && rwmode == O_RDWR) { > ... /* this is successful: */ > fd = open(disk, O_RDONLY); > ... /* the following opens get device not configured, or no such file or > directory under normal operation, from truss */ > for (p = 1; p < 5; p++) { > asprintf(&s, "%ss%d", disk, p); > fdw = open(s, O_RDONLY); > free(s); > if (fdw == -1) > continue; > break; > } > ... /* ah ha! open_disk is returning -4 because the last slice had some > error */ > if (fdw == -1) > return -4; > > This change was introduced with version 1.67 of the fdisk.c file. > > Commenting out if (fdw == -1) return -4; allows fdisk -u to function. Here > are the results, not changing anything: > > # ./fdisk -u > ******* Working on device /dev/da0 ******* > parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: > cylinders=534921 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) > > Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1 > parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: > cylinders=534921 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) > > Do you want to change our idea of what BIOS thinks ? [n] > Media sector size is 512 > Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 > Information from DOS bootblock is: > The data for partition 1 is: > sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) > start 63, size 75489372 (36860 Meg), flag 80 (active) > beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; > end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63 > Do you want to change it? [n] > The data for partition 2 is: > > Do you want to change it? [n] > The data for partition 3 is: > > Do you want to change it? [n] > The data for partition 4 is: > > Do you want to change it? [n] > Partition 1 is marked active > Do you want to change the active partition? [n] > > Here are the results of ./fdisk -u when trying to add the second > partition: > > # ./fdisk -u > ******* Working on device /dev/da0 ******* > parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: > cylinders=534921 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) > > Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1 > parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: > cylinders=534921 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) > > Do you want to change our idea of what BIOS thinks ? [n] n > Media sector size is 512 > Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 > Information from DOS bootblock is: > The data for partition 1 is: > sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) > start 63, size 75489372 (36860 Meg), flag 80 (active) > beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; > end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63 > Do you want to change it? [n] n > The data for partition 2 is: > > Do you want to change it? [n] y > Supply a decimal value for "sysid (165=FreeBSD)" [0] 165 > Supply a decimal value for "start" [0] > Supply a decimal value for "size" [0] > fdisk: ERROR: size of partition is zero > fdisk: ERROR: failed to adjust; setting sysid to 0 > Explicitly specify beg/end address ? [n] y > Supply a decimal value for "beginning cylinder" [0] 1024 > Supply a decimal value for "beginning head" [0] > Supply a decimal value for "beginning sector" [0] > Supply a decimal value for "ending cylinder" [0] 534921 > Supply a decimal value for "ending head" [0] 254 > Supply a decimal value for "ending sector" [0] 63 > sysid 0 (0000),(unused) > start 0, size 0 (0 Meg), flag 0 > beg: cyl 0/ head 0/ sector 0; > end: cyl 393/ head 254/ sector 63 > > Writing it fails, but I didn't really expect it to succeed with the above > values. There's some overflowing going on. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 00:39:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D61D16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:39:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@datas.zapto.org) Received: from postino4.prima.com.ar (postino4.prima.com.ar [200.42.0.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB0C643D6D for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:39:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@datas.zapto.org) Received: (qmail 86483 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2005 00:39:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO datas.zapto.org) (200.42.68.78) by postino4.prima.com.ar with SMTP; 29 Jul 2005 00:39:11 -0000 Received: by datas.zapto.org (Postfix, from userid 0) id 4CF4511D8C7; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:00:17 -0300 (ART) To: questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050729000017.4CF4511D8C7@datas.zapto.org> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:00:17 -0300 (ART) From: root@datas.zapto.org (root) Cc: Subject: Atencion!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:39:15 -0000 DATAS COMPUTACIÓN - CEL.: 15-5748-9820 MASTERLINUX@CIUDAD.COM.AR TODO PARA SU EMPRESA - DATAS LE OFRECE LO MEJOR EN LINUX * INSTALACIÓN DE FILE & PRINT SERVERS GNU/LINUX INSTALACIÓN SERVIDORES LINUX COMO SERVIDORES DE ARCHIVOS E IMPRESIÓN: CON SOLUCIONES GNU UD. PUEDE COMPARTIR SUS ARCHIVOS E IMPRESIONES FÁCILMENTE, AHORRÁNDOSE FORTUNAS EN LICENCIAS DE SOFTWARE PROPIETARIO, TANTO DEL LADO DEL SERVER, COMO LICENCIAS DE ACCESO DE CLIENTES. INSTALAMOS SERVIDORES GNU/LINUX , DE LAS DISTRIBUCIONES MAS POPULARES DEL MERCADO: * SERVIDOR WEB : (WEB SERVER) APACHE, ES EL SERVIDOR WEB MAS UTILIZADO DEL MUNDO. CERCA DEL 65% DE LOS ISP LO UTILIZAN PARA BRINDAR SOLUCIONES A SUS CLIENTES. DE HECHO GOOGLE, CUENTA CON CERCA DE 10.000 SERVIDORES LINUX CORRIENDO APACHE. TANTO EN SU VERSIÓN 1.3.XX COMO EN LA MODERNA VERSIÓN 2.0 . PONGA A FUNCIONAR APACHE EN SU INTRANET O EN SU SERVIDOR WEB CORPORATIVO , OPTIMIZANDO AL MÁXIMO SUS RECURSOS. * FIREWALL GNU/LINUX: TRIALWAREZ. BRINDA CONSULTORÍA SOBRE SEGURIDAD INFORMÁTICA. SIN DUDA , EL FIREWALL CONSTITUYE UNA DE LAS HERRAMIENTAS MAS IMPORTANTES A LA HORA DE PROTEGERNOS SOBRE LOS CADA VEZ MAYORES ATAQUES EXTERNOS. UNA VEZ QUE CONECTAMOS NUESTRA EMPRESA A INTERNET, ENTRAMOS EN UNA ZONA HOSTIL. LA VERSATILIDAD DE LINUX HACE QUE LA SOLUCIÓN DE FIREWALLING QUE TRAE, SEA IMPLEMENTABLE TANTO EN REDES HOGAREÑAS, PEQUEÑAS LAN, O EMPRESAS CON CIENTOS DE MÁQUINAS. TRIALWAREZ, IMPLEMENTA Y CONFIGURA SOLUCIONES FIREWALL UTILIZANDO TANTO PRODUCTOS GNU COMO IPTABLES A PARTIR DEL KERNEL 2.4, COMO SOLUCIONES NO GNU PERO DENTRO DE LAS DISTRIBUCIONES LINUX COMO SUSE, MANDRAKE, RED HAT ETC. * SERVIDOR PROXY CACHE INSTALACIÓN DE SQUID PROXY CACHÉ SERVER: ¿DESEA COMPARTIR UNA ÚNICA CONEXIÓN A INTERNET CON TODA SU EMPRESA.? QUIERE OPTIMIZAR SU CONEXIÓN ADSL UTILIZANDO UNA PC EN DESUSO , Y ADEMÁS, SIN COSTO DE LICENCIAS ADICIONALES ? ¿NECESITA ALMACENAR LAS PÁGINAS MAS VISTAS PARA OPTIMIZAR ANCHO DE BANDA Y ACELERAR LA NAVEGACIÓN.? DESEA REALIZAR UN CONTROL SOBRE LOS SITIOS QUE SUS EMPLEADOS VISITAN, ESTABLECIENDO UN ESQUEMA DE USUARIO Y CONTRASEÑA, QUE ADEMÁS DE FILTRAR LOS CONTENIDOS INDEBIDOS, LE PERMITIRÁ SACAR TODO TIPO DE ESTADÍSTICAS POR USUARIO, SITIOS NAVEGADOS, KBYTES ETC. ? NO LO DUDE MAS, ENTONCES, NECESITA INSTALAR UN SERVIDOR SQUID PROXY CACHE. NOSOTROS LE INSTALAMOS UN SERVIDOR CON UN CACHE DEL TAMAÑO QUE SU ORGANIZACIÓN REQUIERE Y , SIN ABONARLE LICENCIAS A NADIE, DISFRUTE DE TODAS ESA VENTAJAS YA!. * SERVIDORES DE CORREO BRINDELE A SU ORGANIZACIÓN LA POSIBILIDAD DE CONTAR CON UN SERVIDOR DE CORREO CORPORATIVO, CON CONTROL DE VIRUS Y SPAM, SIN TENER QUE DESENBOLSAR FORTUNAS EN SOFTWARE, NI DEDICAR EQUIPOS MONSTRUOSOS PARA MANEJAR SU MENSAJERÍA. GNU/LINUX CUENTA CON NUMEROSAS SOLUCIONES PARA MANEJAR EL CORREO CORPORATIVO: SENDMAIL, QMAIL, POSTFIX ETC. * REDES PRIVADAS VIRTUALES (VPNS) EL PROPÓSITO DE UNA V.P.N. (VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORK) ES LA DE OFRECER SERVICIOS DE CONECTIVIDAD , EN FORMA SEGURA, UTILIZANDO PARA TAL FIN, MEDIOS QUE NO SON SEGUROS, COMO POR EJEMPLO LA INTERNET PÚBLICA. ESTO ES ÚTIL PARA CUANDO LA EMPRESA CUENTA CON SUCURSALES QUE REQUIEREN COMUNICACIONES DE DATOS, UTILIZANDO POR EJEMPLO LA TECNOLOGÍA DSL. GNU/LINUX NOS PUEDE AYUDAR EN ESTE CAMPO TAMBIÉN, CON HERRAMIENTAS OPEN SOURCE. * ESTACIONES DE MONITOREO DE REDES EL MONITOREO DE REDES, ES UN SERVICIO QUE IMPLEMENTAMOS, QUE CONSISTE EN LA IMPLEMENTACIÓN DE UN CONJUNTO DE HERRAMIENTAS Y TECNOLOGÍAS QUE LE PERMITIRÁ MONITOREAR TANTO SU RED LAN/WAN COMO SUS VÍNCULOS A INTERNET, PUDIENDO VER EL ESTADO DE TODOS LOS DISPOSITIVOS Y DISPARAR ALARMAS GRÁFICAS, SONORAS, Ó ENVIAR MENSAJES POR E-MAIL Ó PAGER EN CASO DE PROBLEMAS, COMO ASÍ TAMBIÉN AGENDANDO TAREAS AUTOMÁTICAS PARA LA SOLUCIÓN DE LOS MISMOS. CON ÉSTOS RECURSOS LOGRARÁ POSEER EL CONTROL DE SU RED AL "ALCANCE DE SU MOUSE". * MIGRACIONES A GNU/LINUX PARA QUE SU PASO AL MUNDO DE LA LIBERTAD OPENSOURCE SEA LO MENOS PROBLEMÁTICO POSIBLE, LE OFRECEMOS NUESTRA EXPERIENCIA EN MIGRACIONES DE WINDOWS (TM) HACIA GNU/LINUX. DESDE SERVIDORES CON BASES DE DATOS, HACIA WORKSTATIONS CON ENTORNOS MS OFFICE(TM) . ELABORAMOS UN PLAN DE MIGRACIÓN Y REALIZAMOS LOS CAMBIOS GRADUALMENTE PARA QUE SU EMPRESA NO PIERDA PRODUCTIVIDAD, LOS USUARIOS, NO EXPERIMENTEN EL FENÓMENO DE LA RESISTENCIA AL CAMBIO, Y FUNDAMENTALMENTE UD. SE AHORRE FORTUNAS EN COSTOS EXORBITANTES EN MATERIA DE LICENCIAS DE SOFTWARE. SI TIENE PROBLEMAS DE LICENCIAS, Y QUIERE REGULARIZAR LA SITUACIÓN , SIN PERDER PRODUCTIVIDAD NI CIFRAS SIDERALES: LLÁMENOS. SABREMOS ASESORARLO. * FTP SERVERS LA MANERA MAS EFICIENTE DE TRANSFERIR ARCHIVOS GRANDES A TRAVES DE SU LAN O , HACIA INTERNET, ES SIN DUDA EL FTP. GNU/LINUX NOS PRESENTA DIVERSAS ALTERNATIVAS PARA AFRONTAR ESTA TAREA. LE CONFIGURAMOS UN ROBUSTO SERVIDOR PARA QUE SE OLVIDE DE LOS PROBLEMAS DE TRANSFERENCIAS QUE NO LLEGAN, O USUARIOS QUE SATURAN EL CORREO CON ARCHIVOS GIGANTES. PONGA A FUNCIONAR EN SU EMPRESA, EL MÉTODO DE TRANSFERENCIA DE ARCHIVOS MAS POPULAR EN INTERNET. * IMPLEMENTACIONES ESPECIALES GNU/LINUX TRABAJOS ESPECIALES DE INSTALACIÓN DE APLICACIONES EN PARTICULAR. MIGRACIONES DE REDES COMPLETAS DEL ENTORNO WINDOWS(TM) HACIA GNU LINUX , OBTENIENDO COMO RESULTADO REDES MAS ROBUSTAS, AHORRANDO SU EMPRESA FORTUNAS EN LICENCIAS DE SOFTWARE . MIGRACIONES DE WORKSTATIONS , E INSTALACIÓN DE SERVIDORES DE ARCHIVOS, SERVIDORES WEB, DE IMPRESIÓN, BASES DE DATOS, DE MENSAJERÍA, FIREWALLS, DNS SERVERS, FTP SERVERS, PROXY SERVERS, CACHE SERVERS, ANALIZADORES DE LOGS ETC. CIERRE LAS VENTANAS, ABRALE LAS PUERTAS A GNU LINUX Y SEA LIBRE!!!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 00:51:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9988916A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:51:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com) Received: from mx20.fujixerox.co.jp (mx20.fujixerox.co.jp [192.26.96.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E2143D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:51:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com) Received: from isvw20.fujixerox.co.jp ([129.249.27.140]) by mx20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6T0pBp3000615; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:51:11 +0900 (JST) Received: from ms20.fujixerox.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by isvw20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6T0pB8v025796; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:51:11 +0900 (JST) Received: from ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (ms1 [129.249.27.192]) by ms20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6T0pAoM024754; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:51:10 +0900 (JST) Received: from sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com ([13.198.8.73]) by ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (8.11.6p2a/3.7W) with ESMTP id j6T0p7m06234; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:51:08 +0900 (JST) Received: from mailhost.sgp.fujixerox.com by sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com with ESMTP id 99023841122598240; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:50:40 +0800 Received: from imss.sgp.fujixerox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4611D93C; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:50:37 +0800 (SGT) Received: from sess.xssc.sgp.xerox.com (unknown [13.198.33.122]) by imss.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0771E1D938; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:50:37 +0800 (SGT) From: Xu Qiang To: Dan Nelson Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:53:56 +0800 X-Sent-Folder-Path: Sent Items X-Mailer: Oracle Connector for Outlook 9.0.4 60130 (9.0.2711) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20050729005037.0771E1D938@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: groupadd/useradd in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:51:34 -0000 Dan Nelson wrote: > No-one usually logs in as the mysql user, so you don't need to set > one. Mysqld will automatically setuid() itself to the "mysql" user > when it starts up. Suppose it is a general scenario, not restricted to MySQL setup. How to set= up a user's password after creating his/her uid/username? thanks, = Regards, Xu Qiang From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 01:10:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF5016A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:10:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@reusel.de) Received: from azure.internetking.de (internetking.de [213.239.216.77]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B159343D48 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:10:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@reusel.de) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (p54819ED3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.129.158.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by azure.internetking.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FF019E3; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:10:25 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20050729005037.0771E1D938@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> References: <20050729005037.0771E1D938@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Message-Id: <2AC14551-A135-4D8B-866C-AA6922DBEEA2@reusel.de> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Reisenweber?= Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:10:31 +0200 To: Xu Qiang X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Dan Nelson , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: groupadd/useradd in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:10:28 -0000 Am 29.07.2005 um 02:53 schrieb Xu Qiang: > Suppose it is a general scenario, not restricted to MySQL setup. =20 > How to set up a user's password after creating his/her uid/username? as root do a "passwd ". J=F6rg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 01:34:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44E716A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:34:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6B043D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:34:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j6T1YFIv069226; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:34:15 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:34:15 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Xu Qiang Message-ID: <20050729013415.GA33847@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20050729005037.0771E1D938@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050729005037.0771E1D938@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: groupadd/useradd in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:34:18 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 29), Xu Qiang said: > Dan Nelson wrote: > > No-one usually logs in as the mysql user, so you don't need to set > > one. Mysqld will automatically setuid() itself to the "mysql" user > > when it starts up. > > Suppose it is a general scenario, not restricted to MySQL setup. How > to set up a user's password after creating his/her uid/username? You can use the passwd command as root, or if you want to set it from a script, you can use the -h option to "pw usermod". -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 01:48:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ECC216A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:48:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com) Received: from mx21.fujixerox.co.jp (mx21.fujixerox.co.jp [192.26.96.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FE143D49 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:48:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com) Received: from isvw21.fujixerox.co.jp ([129.249.27.141]) by mx21.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6T1mOok025656; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:48:24 +0900 (JST) Received: from ms20.fujixerox.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by isvw21.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6T1mOZD019567; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:48:24 +0900 (JST) Received: from ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (ms1 [129.249.27.192]) by ms20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6T1mN0g023650; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:48:23 +0900 (JST) Received: from sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com ([13.198.8.73]) by ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (8.11.6p2a/3.7W) with ESMTP id j6T1mMm14902; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:48:22 +0900 (JST) Received: from mailhost.sgp.fujixerox.com by sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com with ESMTP id 99152191122601664; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:47:44 +0800 Received: from imss.sgp.fujixerox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065DC1D9A1; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:47:41 +0800 (SGT) Received: from sess.xssc.sgp.xerox.com (unknown [13.198.33.122]) by imss.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C969D1D9A7; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:47:40 +0800 (SGT) From: Xu Qiang To: Dan Nelson Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:51:00 +0800 X-Sent-Folder-Path: Sent Items X-Mailer: Oracle Connector for Outlook 9.0.4 60130 (9.0.2711) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20050729014740.C969D1D9A7@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: groupadd/useradd in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:48:42 -0000 Maybe it is an off-topic question. I "cd /usr/local/mysql/sql-bench" and "perl run_all_tests", just to get the= following error: = ------------------------------------------------------------- Got error: 'Access denied for user 'root'@'localhost' (using password: NO)'= when connecting to DBI:mysql:database=3Dtest;host=3Dlocalhost with user: '= ' password: '' ------------------------------------------------------------- By the way, before doing the bench test, I did this operation: = /usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqladmin -u root password 'new-password' /usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqladmin -u root -h gso_dev_2.workgroup password 'ne= w-password' Is this the cause? = Dan, I remember you said that mysqld will automatically setuid() itself to = the "mysql" user when it starts up. = How to let the bench test run? Thanks in advance, = Regards, Xu Qiang From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 02:14:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F9A16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:14:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com) Received: from mx21.fujixerox.co.jp (mx21.fujixerox.co.jp [192.26.96.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19CF944029 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:14:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com) Received: from isvw21.fujixerox.co.jp ([129.249.27.141]) by mx21.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6T2Dr7d000722; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:13:53 +0900 (JST) Received: from ms20.fujixerox.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by isvw21.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6T2DrXo029559; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:13:53 +0900 (JST) Received: from ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (ms1 [129.249.27.192]) by ms20.fujixerox.co.jp with ESMTP id j6T2Dqhs006590; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:13:52 +0900 (JST) Received: from sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com ([13.198.8.73]) by ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (8.11.6p2a/3.7W) with ESMTP id j6T2Dpm18854; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:13:51 +0900 (JST) Received: from mailhost.sgp.fujixerox.com by sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com with ESMTP id 99212611122603217; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:13:37 +0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 648781D969; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:13:33 +0800 (SGT) Received: from sess.xssc.sgp.xerox.com (unknown [13.198.33.122]) by imss.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8AE71D9A1; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:13:29 +0800 (SGT) From: Xu Qiang To: Dan Nelson , Xu Qiang Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:16:49 +0800 X-Sent-Folder-Path: Sent Items X-Mailer: Oracle Connector for Outlook 9.0.4 60130 (9.0.2711) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20050729021329.D8AE71D9A1@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: groupadd/useradd in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:14:03 -0000 Dan Nelson wrote: > You set a password on mysql's root user, and probably didn't tell > sql-bench about it. Take a look at the the sql-bench documentation or > look at the run_all_tests script to find out how to tell it what the > password is. Sorry I didn't read the file README in the sql-bench directory before askin= g the question. = Now I run the test with "perl run-all_tests --user=3Dmysql", and it can run= now. = Thanks for pointing our that. :) Regards, Xu Qiang From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 02:24:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654BA16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:24:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ian.moore@hamcoll.sa.edu.au) Received: from decs-smtp2.decs.sa.edu.au (decs-smtp2.decs.sa.edu.au [203.122.254.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DCE643D48 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:24:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ian.moore@hamcoll.sa.edu.au) Received: from decs-smtp2.decs.sa.edu.au (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by decs-smtp2.decs.sa.edu.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6261FECB for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:54:43 +0930 (CST) Received: from decs-smtp3.decs.sa.edu.au (unknown [172.18.0.156]) by decs-smtp2.decs.sa.edu.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85381FEC9 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:54:43 +0930 (CST) Received: from decs-smtp3.decs.sa.edu.au (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by decs-smtp3.decs.sa.edu.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DA713CB8A for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:54:45 +0930 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by decs-smtp3.decs.sa.edu.au (Postfix) with SMTP id F398E13CB86 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:54:44 +0930 (CST) Received: from decs-smtp3.decs.sa.edu.au (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain with SMTP (Lyris MailShield LINUX version 3.2a); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:54:44 +0900 Received: from [10.61.45.239] (unknown [10.61.45.239]) by decs-smtp3.decs.sa.edu.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F4413CB8A for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:54:44 +0930 (CST) Message-ID: <42E9936B.5010805@hamcoll.sa.edu.au> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:54:43 +0930 From: Ian Moore User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 MultiZilla/1.6.4.0b X-Accept-Language: en-au, en, en-gb, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Questions Free BSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on decs-smtp3.decs.sa.edu.au X-SMTP-HELO: decs-smtp3.decs.sa.edu.au X-SMTP-MAIL-FROM: ian.moore@hamcoll.sa.edu.au X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-SMTP-PEER-INFO: localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1] X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: Subject: Getting session details from a dump tape X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:24:49 -0000 Hi, I've done a level 0 dump of a server which is spanned over several tapes. Somehow, when I was labelling the tapes, I did something wrong and have an extra tape in there. I'm wondering if there is some way to find out what is on the tapes? I know I could do an ls to look at the files, but that won't really tell me what dump level it was and when it was dumped. Things I've tried: 1. On the first tape, I can just run #restore -i #what and that gives me the info I need for that tape, however, when I do the same for the next tape, it just says it's not the first tape of the set. 2. Try to read from /dev/sa0 directly: #head /dev/sa0 That didn't give any output, except in the log file, where is says: 10240-byte tape record bigger than supplied buffer. Cheers, -- Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 02:30:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F02016A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:30:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hornetmadness@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D2343D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:30:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hornetmadness@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 34so130625rns for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:30:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=i9q454S8kDxtVnf5ViTrPc73tzyK+J0Rw9xaxeCsJOXFVOQocao1c/mGZV+Jd/TdlRGJ98xlhdFjLDJexYrXGijlHZcfHoxUPQf3AE43hAN36w1zpcew4QwFZqhM3581FuRiUFcZIR34eWt+HkGc1xIC0TyzxJak27yrgHLKNaU= Received: by 10.38.3.77 with SMTP id 77mr77745rnc; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:30:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.8.23 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:30:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:30:40 -0400 From: Hornet To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=C3=B8rgaard?= In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dead disk? READ_DMA Failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:30:54 -0000 On 7/28/05, Erik N=C3=B8rgaard wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Please read on although this is a long one... I might panic and > coredump myself if I don't get this fixed. >=20 > I have a one year old Hitachi Travelstar 60GB/4200RPM disk. This > night and since then, I get these errors: >=20 > ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=3D48926527 > ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=3D48926527 > ad0: FAILURE - READ_DMA timed out >=20 > or >=20 > ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=3D50299455 > ad0: FAILURE - READ_DMA status=3D51 > error=3D40 LBA=3D50299455 >=20 > The LBA number varies, but otherwise it is consistent. Eventually > the device is removed from /dev and no disk is accessible, > although mount shows mounted devices. >=20 > I have booted in single user mode and run fsck manually multiple > times to correct all found errors, most errors are on /, /usr and > some on /var, yet the problem reappears. >=20 > I have tried to reinstall, toggling newfs to recreate /, /usr and > /var hoping that any bad blocks or sectors would be removed or > marked unusable. But the problem remains. >=20 > Is there a way I can reformat or fix the disk so that broken areas > will not be used again? >=20 > Please, how far from the grave are my data? >=20 > Any suggestion on which new drive to choose? I have looked at > Western Digital Scorpio WD600VE 60 GB. >=20 > Given the mentioned error, does this indicate an error that would > be covered by standard guarantee? after all the disk is just one > year old... >=20 > The system: FreeBSD 5.4, Epia Mini-ITX CL1000, 256MB RAM, 60 GB > HDD. >=20 > Thanks, Erik >=20 > GnuPG: http://www.locolomo.org/home/norgaard/norgaard.gpg.asc > pub 1024D/11D11F9E 2003-08-15 Erik Norgaard > Key fingerprint =3D C394 81C4 D137 EEE5 39BE 82D5 3E6B FB3E 11D1 1F= 9E >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" >=20 Its been in my experience that once the disk starts getting bad sectors, it will just get worse with time. If DOS could format around bad sectors, I'm sure BSD can do it. I would suggest that you backup your data, and RMA the drive. That is the safest way to go about this. If you cant/wont RMA the drive then make that 60G drive hold non-vital information, and use another drive for your system slices. -Erik- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 02:37:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C5316A421 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:37:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4034402C for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:10:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j6T2AdOh041105; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:10:39 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:10:39 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Xu Qiang Message-ID: <20050729021039.GB33847@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20050729014740.C969D1D9A7@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050729014740.C969D1D9A7@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: groupadd/useradd in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:37:44 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 29), Xu Qiang said: > Maybe it is an off-topic question. > > I "cd /usr/local/mysql/sql-bench" and "perl run_all_tests", just to get the following error: > ------------------------------------------------------------- > Got error: 'Access denied for user 'root'@'localhost' (using password: NO)' when connecting to DBI:mysql:database=test;host=localhost with user: '' password: '' > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > By the way, before doing the bench test, I did this operation: > /usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqladmin -u root password 'new-password' > /usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqladmin -u root -h gso_dev_2.workgroup password 'new-password' You set a password on mysql's root user, and probably didn't tell sql-bench about it. Take a look at the the sql-bench documentation or look at the run_all_tests script to find out how to tell it what the password is. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 03:28:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6194416A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:28:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tragek@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F109A43D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:28:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tragek@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so539721wra for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:28:46 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=tjLPjbLlEikPBUeGP/P5VOcFcB5EMJEw2HARyg8BlR1ZGy45y2joWwcX+vYZYcHCqvDtSTBfQcBn3aTPcKJG8N1BWQFw+6ni5Z05PD9mFMaxrYiBgSzu+jqToVDyL3SBxsD+YXQgHAcDCSklW6T2x6+Gwd/IWeN/yMHk0vYFbiI= Received: by 10.54.42.38 with SMTP id p38mr1061110wrp; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:28:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.160.17 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:28:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:28:46 -0600 From: Matthew To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Bind failures X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthew List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:28:47 -0000 Recently I aquired a wireless card, and sometime during the setup I believe I borked something. Nothing seems to be able to bind to a port. During start up each time I see an error like : "Starting syslogd. Jul 28 18:13:31 syslogd: bind: Can't assign requested address Jul 28 18:13:31 syslogd: bind: Can't assign requested address syslogd:=20 child pid 279 exited with return code 1 ... Starting snmpd. Starting snmptrapd. Jul 28 18:13:39 snmptrapd[490]: Starting snmptrapd 5.2.1 Jul 28 18:13:39 snmptrapd[490]: couldn't open udp:162 -- errno 49 ("Can't a= ssign requested address") " Any other program that wants to bind to an adress (Instiki, kismet etc.) cannot. And yet, aside from these errors, for the most part the system seems to be operating mostly normally. Anyone have any idea of what's going on, and a way to fix it? The closest references I have found to this problem so far refer me to check my /etc/hosts and /etc/netstart files. But, as far as I know, they are still intact. --=20 Matthew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 03:36:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCFEE16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:36:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd.wang@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D74043D49 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:36:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd.wang@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i32so506160wra for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:36:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Kz6rHXizPtKovUUay3qEFIMJtJ7CyRoNtJWEWe0Euh61uW400oZ/wQM8/tQWzI8tNQnXEc4EBuUUNDojbYqWwrjhF5VmzoNwrWXxUS4+EIc0EWkoB1y+ek5rbY1JLTB3Zok+9PLN8cOjt7CPBeYU4NsQ/MJM7ZBhu8fMknV8nAU= Received: by 10.54.99.7 with SMTP id w7mr1078211wrb; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:36:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.114.18 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:36:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:36:21 +0800 From: Wang FreeBSD To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: buildworld failed in /usr/src/contrib/groff/src/preproc/eqn/eqn.y and lex.cpp, no such file box.h and eqn_tab.h X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Wang FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:36:22 -0000 I want to migration from FreeBSD 5.2 to FreeBSD RELENG_5. After using cvsup update source code, I run buildworld. First time it stop at libstdc++, no unwind.h, I fixed it by modify Makefile.inc in it. Second time it stop at libsupc++, fixed it with same way. Third time, it failed in libgroff, fixed it with same way. Last time, it reports a strange error message, I don't know how to fix it. I search on Google, found some people meet the same problem with me in NetB= SD. The answer is got /usr/src/gnu/groff/, make cleandir twice. I don't know it works or not. Anyone can help me? Following is the error message: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D> gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc =3D=3D=3D> gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn yacc -d /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contri= b/groff/src/preproc/eqn/eqn.y mv -f y.tab.c eqn.cpp mv -f y.tab.h eqn_tab.h rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a =20 -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/grof= f/src/include -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../src/include =20 eqn.cpp /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contri= b/groff/src/preproc/eqn/main.cpp /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/= src/preproc/eqn/lex.cpp /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/= src/preproc/eqn/box.cpp /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/= src/preproc/eqn/limit.cpp /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/= src/preproc/eqn/list.cpp /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/= src/preproc/eqn/over.cpp /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/= src/preproc/eqn/text.cpp /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/= src/preproc/eqn/script.cpp /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/= src/preproc/eqn/mark.cpp /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/= src/preproc/eqn/other.cpp /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/= src/preproc/eqn/delim.cpp /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/= src/preproc/eqn/sqrt.cpp /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/= src/preproc/eqn/pile.cpp /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/= src/preproc/eqn/special.cpp /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/= src/preproc/eqn/eqn.y:25:17: box.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/= src/preproc/eqn/lex.cpp:23:21: eqn_tab.h: No such file or directory mkdep: compile failed *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D uname -a FreeBSD alan.jane.net 5.2.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Feb 23 20:45:55 GMT 2004 root@wv1u.btc.adaptec.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D /etc/make.conf CPUTYPE=3Di686 CFLAGS=3D -O -pipe CXXFLAGS=3D -O -pipe #CXFLAGS+=3D -fmemoize-lookups -fsave-memoized COPTFLAGS=3D -O -pipe #WANT_FORCE_OPTIMIZATION_DOWNGRADE=3D1 NO_FORTRAN=3D true NO_I4B =3D true NO_IPFILTER=3D true NO_LPR =3D true NO_OBJC =3D true NO_SENDMAIL=3D true NOGAMES =3D true NO_MAILWRAPPER=3D true From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 04:18:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757B716A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 04:18:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD13D43D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 04:18:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([69.160.76.67]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with ESMTP id <20050729041813.BYTS14360.mta13.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net>; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:18:13 -0400 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 234F7B515; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:18:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:18:40 -0400 From: Parv To: Dave McCammon Message-ID: <20050729041839.GA76273@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Dave McCammon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3tll3tystl.l3t@mail.opusnet.com> <20050728204032.71440.qmail@web32812.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050728204032.71440.qmail@web32812.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can someone clarify ipfw's in/out/recv/xmit/via concepts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 04:18:15 -0000 in message <20050728204032.71440.qmail@web32812.mail.mud.yahoo.com>, wrote Dave McCammon thusly... > > Here is a link to a thread that help me to understand the > in/out/recv/xmit stuff. > > http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc/tree/browse_frm/thread/240d22a55265689/4bb2dd91a376fa6c?rnum=1&hl=en&_done=%2Fgroup%2Fcomp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F240d22a55265689%2F2c14cdd252d01ff2%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26rnum%3D4%26prev%3D%2Fgroups%3Fq%3Dipfw%2Bout%2Brecv%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26selm%3D3B5E86C8.8438BEE7%2540amit.cz%26rnum%3D4%26#doc_8d3d7ceea76d1cca > After replacing all %[0-9a-f][0-9a-f] but %40 w/ their respective characters and then deleting (almost) nonessential things, URL shrinks to (works in Opera 8.x) ... http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc/tree/browse_frm/thread/240d22a55265689/4bb2dd91a376fa6c/groups?selm=3B5E86C8.8438BEE7%40amit.cz&#doc_8d3d7ceea76d1cca > ok kind of long ...do a search in google groups using- > Why is there a "out recv" interface spec in ipfw? That, of course, would have been faster if one is *really* wanted to learn about that. - Parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 06:02:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0217516A420 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 06:02:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alexey@yoxel.com) Received: from smtp105.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp105.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8876B43D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 06:02:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alexey@yoxel.com) Received: (qmail 9629 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2005 06:02:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO adsl-67-112-216-83.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net) (panteleyev@sbcglobal.net@67.112.216.83 with plain) by smtp105.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Jul 2005 06:02:18 -0000 From: Alexey Panteleyev Organization: Yoxel Systems To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:01:33 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507282301.33432.alexey@yoxel.com> Subject: Yoxel.Com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 06:02:20 -0000 Hello FreeBSD team, We have been working on an interesting project here at Yoxel.Com. It is a project management service called "Release Planning System" which allows software developing teams to: - collaboratively create a release plan based on deadline, effort estimates and priorities. - track implementation of the release - track testing phase of the release - generate various release reports and charts This service automates most of the planning, prioritizing and resource allocation tasks that many software developing teams do manually these days. It is intended to greatly simplify current software project management processes. RPS is in 'beta' now and we would like to start engaging with development teams to prove the concept and work out the details. Do you think RPS could be of any interest for your projects (or sub-projects)? I appreciate your time, Alexey Panteleev From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 07:30:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8CC16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 07:30:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nullpt@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4D343D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 07:30:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nullpt@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i5so580738wra for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:30:30 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=g/Luevcbrn86vHmeqzsnplhQjq3RLI3cCy6mial5jwnPN/j8xeF9rbUiSgqX7pouogayyzHCm798byE62lznBkc/APKKw0vJGqrhkmU+/qZiOp/2P0Wgb/rmWqZrKa6cCQwF2fTmDimhOAdo6vksi6C67Vl5seHPxgGykV2vQ8c= Received: by 10.54.42.62 with SMTP id p62mr1165475wrp; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:30:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:30:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <755cb9fc050729003050edf7ef@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:30:30 +0100 From: Alexandre Vieira To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20050728153729.156ff2d0@cobalt.antimatter.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <755cb9fc05072815171ac8003@mail.gmail.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050728153729.156ff2d0@cobalt.antimatter.net> Subject: Re: Sendmail help needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alexandre Vieira List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 07:30:31 -0000 Hello, Thanks for the help. The thing is that our main mailserver is not able to work with reports from only one address. It has a db with some "names" that match name@ourinternaldomain.tld and then send the reports to the respective persons/mailing lists. So the basics of the question is: Is it possible to get every mail (including local mail) redirected to one domain with MX lookup? I've been reading about LUSER_RELAY, LOCAL_RELAY, stickyhost, but I don't know if this will solve the problem. On 7/28/05, Glenn Dawson wrote: > At 03:17 PM 7/28/2005, Alexandre Vieira wrote: > >Hello folks, > > > >I'm trying to get past a standard in sendmail which is very simple. > > > >I have several machines reporting mails trough local MTA's (sendmail) > >in each one of the boxes to our main mailserver. The thing is, I did > >not developed the scripts and they are using "mailx -s user" > >which normally would try to deliver it to a local account in the > >machine. So the question is: Can I, in any way, define that every > >"user" passed on the mailx in every script gets resolved to > >user@somedomain.tld and not to a local system account? We have > >hundreds of "names" in the scripts, so aliasing doesn't work for me. >=20 > If you don't _ever_ want things to be delivered locally, you can create > what sendmail calls a null client. That will send all mail to the addres= s > you specify. You can get more details from /usr/share/sendmail/cf/README >=20 > -Glenn >=20 >=20 > >My current hack is defining DR and DS in the sendmail.cf to a static > >hostname but that takes redundancy to our mail system since if the > >main mailserver is down the backup mail server (higher MX) won't take > >any effect. > > > >Any help apreciated > >Cheers > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.= org" >=20 >=20 Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 07:51:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03D016A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 07:51:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (hobbiton.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA13E43D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 07:51:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [166.70.98.166] (helo=[10.85.0.16]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.51) id 1DyPeE-0000kY-Kp; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:51:14 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <164459CB-E774-47C1-BFE5-A64A232A4F31@shire.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:51:13 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.98.166 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: Chad Leigh Subject: URGENT -- AP #1 (PHY #1) failed -- what does this mean? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 07:51:16 -0000 Hi Sorry for the URGENT line. I have a critical server running 5.4- RELEASE-p1. It is a dual AMD MP 2800+ (Gigabyte board) with 4GB RAM and an Adaptec 2100S raid controller. Running (obviously) an SMP kernel. I recompiled the kernel this afternoon and changed one line -- the options HZ line from HZ=1100 to HZ=400 as a test of PHP performance. That was the only thing changed (the machine had been up since I installed 5.4 on it June 1). I built and installed the kernel and tonight I rebooted the machine. Now when it boots it comes up and real memory = 3758030848 (3583 MB) avail memory = 3678240768 (3507 MB) ACPI APIC Table: AP #1 (PHY# 1) failed! panic y/n? [y] What does this mean (and what do I do about it)? I am off to Google but as I am in a real tight spot I thought I would ask for some help asap before I go and try and figure this out. Thanks Chad From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 08:21:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC52116A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:21:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zickxell@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7559E43D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:21:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zickxell@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i22so575659wra for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:21:09 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:x-mailer:reply-to:x-priority:message-id:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZDauLYVUWfpsz3lmyp2dqDgsqRWELgw074NKEKPrPPFSHgIEn5tobm+ZhCjpBesf5ZqA1qQvSyDOu61IT66tBXwakkzZ2V6y2kbxKTqsUNnzTvNzfqmGLiej/If20Mw3v4Mxg0i2WXNoDKO/Qji7iTYi24TUoWYUzIGIrPBUwSE= Received: by 10.54.18.58 with SMTP id 58mr1192727wrr; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?80.237.53.29? ([80.237.53.29]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 28sm2878061wrl.2005.07.29.01.21.08; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:17:09 +0600 From: Sergey X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.1.33) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <789703971.20050729141709@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: KDE in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sergey List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:21:11 -0000 Hello. Explain how to adjust please dial-up connection in KDE about the help kppp? I have made all as it is necessary but by pressing "connect" there is a tablet " modem is busy ". The modem does not react. -- Best regards, Sergey mailto:zickxell@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 08:26:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3919C16A420 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:26:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F69543D58 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:26:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6T8QUGH018517 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:26:30 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050729012030.068245a0@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:23:13 -0700 To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <164459CB-E774-47C1-BFE5-A64A232A4F31@shire.net> References: <164459CB-E774-47C1-BFE5-A64A232A4F31@shire.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Chad Leigh Subject: Re: URGENT -- AP #1 (PHY #1) failed -- what does this mean? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:26:32 -0000 At 12:51 AM 7/29/2005, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: >Hi > >Sorry for the URGENT line. I have a critical server running 5.4- >RELEASE-p1. It is a dual AMD MP 2800+ (Gigabyte board) with 4GB RAM >and an Adaptec 2100S raid controller. > >Running (obviously) an SMP kernel. I recompiled the kernel this >afternoon and changed one line -- the > >options HZ line from HZ=1100 to HZ=400 as a test of PHP >performance. That was the only thing changed (the machine had been >up since I installed 5.4 on it June 1). I built and installed the >kernel and tonight I rebooted the machine. > >Now when it boots it comes up and > >real memory = 3758030848 (3583 MB) >avail memory = 3678240768 (3507 MB) >ACPI APIC Table: >AP #1 (PHY# 1) failed! >panic y/n? [y] > > >What does this mean (and what do I do about it)? That basically means that the kernel failed to start the second CPU. -Glenn >I am off to Google but as I am in a real tight spot I thought I would >ask for some help asap before I go and try and figure this out. > >Thanks >Chad > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 08:35:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B1116A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:35:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065F143D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:35:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:35:40 +0200 id 00000018.42E9EA5C.0001059F Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:35:40 +0200 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20050729083540.GA66756@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <20050729002602.65ff60bb.dick@nagual.st> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: Dick Hoogendijk Subject: Re: need some advice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:35:42 -0000 On 28 Jul Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, dick hoogendijk wrote: > >My options are: > > > >Athlon64-3000+ (Newcastle) on a MSI K8T NEO-FSR board (1Gb 3200 mem) > >Athlon64-3400+ (Clawhammer on the same board > >Intel Prescott 3.4Mhz on a Intel 915p board (1024 Mb DDRII pc4300 > >memory) > >I will run FreebSD on it (compile a lot of ports) and (windows-xp/98se) > >for gaming. > >Any advice is welcome. > Wha?!?! Win98?!?! are you insane? No, of course I'm not ;-) Win98se runs perfectly well on new machines and the fact is that a lot of games that I like very much *don't* run on XP. Period. The older command&conquer series i.e. and lots of point&click adventures that my wife is font of. Of course, the newer games do run on XP, but most of them also run very smooth (even smoother) on W98. Windows just for gaming to me means w98se. It's faster, smoother and smaller. I'll bring it up to modern standards though by installing the unofficial SP2 for windows98se. This gives hundreds of changes under the hood. It's programmed by very well skilled programmers (a bit like the ones of tweakui, which is not bad either). W98se systems w/ SP2 are very stable and have the looks of windows2000. Not bad at all for a couple of years more. I agree, if you want more (other) things like audio/movie etc.. go for windows2000 or XP. That's why I have all three of them. FreeBSD (to me is my main system); w98 is the gaming engine; XP is for multimedia which is still a bit difficult in the *nix world. > The only thing I could see justifying that would be playing PSX games > with bleem (since it was only supported on 98), and that's it. Doing that, that is what I'd call slow. With today's prices you should play PSX games on a psx1 (modified). Not > only that, 98 wasn't built with today's hardware, so all in all it > will be EXCEPTIONALLY slow performance wise. Heh. I remember running > win98 on a faster P3 and the fact that it was so horribly slow. Finding support for modern hardware is sometimes a little difficult, but up to now I always managed to find the right drivers. I always use kind of standard hardware (like nvidia, creativ, etc). Up and running I ghost the machine and all games run fast and smooth. Like I said earlier, smoother than under XP. -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 08:42:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D80816A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:42:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (hobbiton.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C8143D62 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:42:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.161.222.227] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1DyQSG-00028n-UO; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:42:57 -0600 In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20050729012030.068245a0@cobalt.antimatter.net> References: <164459CB-E774-47C1-BFE5-A64A232A4F31@shire.net> <6.1.0.6.2.20050729012030.068245a0@cobalt.antimatter.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:42:56 -0600 To: Glenn Dawson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.161.222.227 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: URGENT -- AP #1 (PHY #1) failed -- what does this mean? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:42:59 -0000 On Jul 29, 2005, at 2:23 AM, Glenn Dawson wrote: > At 12:51 AM 7/29/2005, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > >> Hi >> >> >> Now when it boots it comes up and >> >> real memory = 3758030848 (3583 MB) >> avail memory = 3678240768 (3507 MB) >> ACPI APIC Table: >> AP #1 (PHY# 1) failed! >> panic y/n? [y] >> >> >> What does this mean (and what do I do about it)? >> > > That basically means that the kernel failed to start the second CPU. Ok, thanks. Googling showed that absent other signs of a true HW problem, others have powercycled and the problem has gone away. That seems to have worked for me as well. Will monitor the situation. Thanks Chad > > -Glenn > --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad@shire.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 08:48:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E811616A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:48:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nullpt@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC8343D48 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:48:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nullpt@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so577323wra for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:48:54 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sGLAe9aJbKiRsRwXk1Db5qucKRxqmw03/In+ayjrXmqddsNtXQiOefpc8Jnyesgyi/j9rUFjVxoZgWwQAdmbUPmOBce/yKNblV603xjlYOKGnnSc0rdnrrsQ1I5RYz8xSqYnaQvtHaXX0WFxU0e3Po3fwM5SYQ5OsjE1AyyKlRg= Received: by 10.54.42.38 with SMTP id p38mr1177647wrp; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:48:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:48:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <755cb9fc05072901482a22540c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:48:54 +0100 From: Alexandre Vieira To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20050729003728.06268da0@cobalt.antimatter.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <755cb9fc05072815171ac8003@mail.gmail.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050728153729.156ff2d0@cobalt.antimatter.net> <755cb9fc050729003050edf7ef@mail.gmail.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050729003728.06268da0@cobalt.antimatter.net> Subject: Re: Sendmail help needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alexandre Vieira List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:48:56 -0000 Hello Glenn, The odds of the reporting system are not of my fully knowledge, I just know how and what mails go from where to who. Imagine that a script on a reporting machine does this: # mailx -s ERROR_FOUND_IN_PROC_SYNC syncproj It will try to deliver the mail locally, as suposed to. If I define a central hub or a Smart host it will deliver the mail I exampled to syncproj@mailhub and it works fine. The problem is that it won't lookup the mailhub MX record, It will send it directly to mailhub:25. Now imagine that mailhub is down? There is a backup server listed as an MX record for the mailhub domain with a higher pref that would take the work while mailhub prefered MX is down. I've been reading a little more and I think there is some kind of feature/option that force a MX lookup on the mailhub host. Thank you On 7/29/05, Glenn Dawson wrote: > At 12:30 AM 7/29/2005, you wrote: > >Hello, > > > >Thanks for the help. > > > >The thing is that our main mailserver is not able to work with reports > >from only one address. It has a db with some "names" that match > >name@ourinternaldomain.tld and then send the reports to the respective > >persons/mailing lists. > >So the basics of the question is: Is it possible to get every mail > >(including local mail) redirected to one domain with MX lookup? I've > >been reading about LUSER_RELAY, LOCAL_RELAY, stickyhost, but I don't > >know if this will solve the problem. >=20 > ok, lets see if I understand this correctly... >=20 > You have an existing mail server that handles mail for you local network. > Some of the mail sent to that server is compared to a database which has > entries that look like somename@internaldomain.com. If a match is found, > the message is redistributed to some list of email addresses. So far so > good? hope so... >=20 > The addresses that are looked at for a match, are they the from address o= r > the to address? >=20 > For example, I send an email to you mail server using the address > user@foo.com. Since I sent the email, it looks like it came from > glenn@antimatter.net. One of those two addresses are compared to a > database to decide what to do with the message. From your description, i= t > sounds like the To: address is the one being looked at by the mail server= . >=20 > "Local" mail is normally considered to be mail between two addresses whic= h > are on the same machine. The from and to addresses for the local mail ca= n > have only account names, or, one or both could have a domain associated > with it. Potentially, mail between the following pairs of addresses coul= d > all be local: >=20 > From: To: > foo bar > foo@internal.com bar > foo bar@internal.com >=20 > From your description above, it sounds like you're looking at mail that = is > always delivered to the same address on the mail server, and then you're > using the address the mail was from to decide what to do with it. Is tha= t > correct? >=20 > From the description below (from the original email) it sounds like the > scripts in question are running on machines that are not the mail server, > and they're only specifying the username to deliver to, and not adding an= y > domain name or hostname to the recipient. Depending on what else is > happening on the machines that have the scripts that generate the mail, i= t > sounds like building a null client is probably the simplest thing to > do. Other options are using some of the masquerading features, or by usi= ng > LOCAL_RELAY to force unqualified names to be send to a central server whi= ch > will figure out what to do with them. >=20 > Hope some of that helps...Let me know if I can clarify anything, I'll be > around for at least another few hours... >=20 > -Glenn >=20 >=20 > >On 7/28/05, Glenn Dawson wrote: > > > At 03:17 PM 7/28/2005, Alexandre Vieira wrote: > > > >Hello folks, > > > > > > > >I'm trying to get past a standard in sendmail which is very simple. > > > > > > > >I have several machines reporting mails trough local MTA's (sendmail= ) > > > >in each one of the boxes to our main mailserver. The thing is, I did > > > >not developed the scripts and they are using "mailx -s user" > > > >which normally would try to deliver it to a local account in the > > > >machine. So the question is: Can I, in any way, define that every > > > >"user" passed on the mailx in every script gets resolved to > > > >user@somedomain.tld and not to a local system account? We have > > > >hundreds of "names" in the scripts, so aliasing doesn't work for me. > > > > > > If you don't _ever_ want things to be delivered locally, you can crea= te > > > what sendmail calls a null client. That will send all mail to the ad= dress > > > you specify. You can get more details from /usr/share/sendmail/cf/RE= ADME > > > > > > -Glenn > > > > > > > > > >My current hack is defining DR and DS in the sendmail.cf to a static > > > >hostname but that takes redundancy to our mail system since if the > > > >main mailserver is down the backup mail server (higher MX) won't tak= e > > > >any effect. > > > > > > > >Any help apreciated > > > >Cheers > > > >_______________________________________________ > > > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > > >Thanks > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.= org" >=20 >=20 --=20 Alexandre Vieira - nullpt@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 09:31:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5085616A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:31:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED66D43D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:31:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6T9Vfrq019517 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:31:41 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050729022549.041a8d10@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:28:23 -0700 To: Alexandre Vieira , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <755cb9fc05072901482a22540c@mail.gmail.com> References: <755cb9fc05072815171ac8003@mail.gmail.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050728153729.156ff2d0@cobalt.antimatter.net> <755cb9fc050729003050edf7ef@mail.gmail.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050729003728.06268da0@cobalt.antimatter.net> <755cb9fc05072901482a22540c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: Sendmail help needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:31:43 -0000 At 01:48 AM 7/29/2005, Alexandre Vieira wrote: >Hello Glenn, > >The odds of the reporting system are not of my fully knowledge, I just >know how and what mails go from where to who. > >Imagine that a script on a reporting machine does this: > ># mailx -s ERROR_FOUND_IN_PROC_SYNC syncproj > >It will try to deliver the mail locally, as suposed to. If I define a >central hub or a Smart host it will deliver the mail I exampled to >syncproj@mailhub and it works fine. The problem is that it won't >lookup the mailhub MX record, It will send it directly to mailhub:25. >Now imagine that mailhub is down? There is a backup server listed as >an MX record for the mailhub domain with a higher pref that would take >the work while mailhub prefered MX is down. If that's all you're worried about, you don't have to worry. If you specify a smart host and it's not available, the mail will get queued locally until it is available. The default settings will hold it in the queue for 5 days. If your smart host is down for that long, you probably have other things to worry about. -Glenn >I've been reading a little more and I think there is some kind of >feature/option that force a MX lookup on the mailhub host. > >Thank you > >On 7/29/05, Glenn Dawson wrote: > > At 12:30 AM 7/29/2005, you wrote: > > >Hello, > > > > > >Thanks for the help. > > > > > >The thing is that our main mailserver is not able to work with reports > > >from only one address. It has a db with some "names" that match > > >name@ourinternaldomain.tld and then send the reports to the respective > > >persons/mailing lists. > > >So the basics of the question is: Is it possible to get every mail > > >(including local mail) redirected to one domain with MX lookup? I've > > >been reading about LUSER_RELAY, LOCAL_RELAY, stickyhost, but I don't > > >know if this will solve the problem. > > > > ok, lets see if I understand this correctly... > > > > You have an existing mail server that handles mail for you local network. > > Some of the mail sent to that server is compared to a database which has > > entries that look like somename@internaldomain.com. If a match is found, > > the message is redistributed to some list of email addresses. So far so > > good? hope so... > > > > The addresses that are looked at for a match, are they the from address or > > the to address? > > > > For example, I send an email to you mail server using the address > > user@foo.com. Since I sent the email, it looks like it came from > > glenn@antimatter.net. One of those two addresses are compared to a > > database to decide what to do with the message. From your description, it > > sounds like the To: address is the one being looked at by the mail server. > > > > "Local" mail is normally considered to be mail between two addresses which > > are on the same machine. The from and to addresses for the local mail can > > have only account names, or, one or both could have a domain associated > > with it. Potentially, mail between the following pairs of addresses could > > all be local: > > > > From: To: > > foo bar > > foo@internal.com bar > > foo bar@internal.com > > > > From your description above, it sounds like you're looking at mail that is > > always delivered to the same address on the mail server, and then you're > > using the address the mail was from to decide what to do with it. Is that > > correct? > > > > From the description below (from the original email) it sounds like the > > scripts in question are running on machines that are not the mail server, > > and they're only specifying the username to deliver to, and not adding any > > domain name or hostname to the recipient. Depending on what else is > > happening on the machines that have the scripts that generate the mail, it > > sounds like building a null client is probably the simplest thing to > > do. Other options are using some of the masquerading features, or by using > > LOCAL_RELAY to force unqualified names to be send to a central server which > > will figure out what to do with them. > > > > Hope some of that helps...Let me know if I can clarify anything, I'll be > > around for at least another few hours... > > > > -Glenn > > > > > > >On 7/28/05, Glenn Dawson wrote: > > > > At 03:17 PM 7/28/2005, Alexandre Vieira wrote: > > > > >Hello folks, > > > > > > > > > >I'm trying to get past a standard in sendmail which is very simple. > > > > > > > > > >I have several machines reporting mails trough local MTA's (sendmail) > > > > >in each one of the boxes to our main mailserver. The thing is, I did > > > > >not developed the scripts and they are using "mailx -s user" > > > > >which normally would try to deliver it to a local account in the > > > > >machine. So the question is: Can I, in any way, define that every > > > > >"user" passed on the mailx in every script gets resolved to > > > > >user@somedomain.tld and not to a local system account? We have > > > > >hundreds of "names" in the scripts, so aliasing doesn't work for me. > > > > > > > > If you don't _ever_ want things to be delivered locally, you can create > > > > what sendmail calls a null client. That will send all mail to the > address > > > > you specify. You can get more details from > /usr/share/sendmail/cf/README > > > > > > > > -Glenn > > > > > > > > > > > > >My current hack is defining DR and DS in the sendmail.cf to a static > > > > >hostname but that takes redundancy to our mail system since if the > > > > >main mailserver is down the backup mail server (higher MX) won't take > > > > >any effect. > > > > > > > > > >Any help apreciated > > > > >Cheers > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > > > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Thanks > > >_______________________________________________ > > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > >-- >Alexandre Vieira - nullpt@gmail.com >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 09:36:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4910B16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:36:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from server.absolute-media.de (server.absolute-media.de [213.239.231.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8151543D48 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:36:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7ACE8C41B; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:36:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.absolute-media.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02796-04; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:36:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firewall.demig (p50839667.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.131.150.103]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E21DD899F7; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:36:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ws-ew-3 (ws-ew-3.w2kdemig [192.168.1.72]) by firewall.demig (8.13.4/8.13.1) with SMTP id j6T9YUt9052607; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:34:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) From: "Norbert Koch" To: "Sergey" , Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:34:42 +0200 Message-ID: <003801c59420$bfd07060$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <789703971.20050729141709@gmail.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at absolute-media.de Cc: Subject: RE: KDE in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:36:47 -0000 > Hello. > > Explain how to adjust please dial-up connection in > KDE about the help kppp? I have made all as it is necessary > but by pressing "connect" there is a tablet " modem is busy ". > The modem does not react. > > > -- > Best regards, > Sergey mailto:zickxell@gmail.com In the announcement/change list for KDE 3.4.2 at kde.org I read this: kppp: fixed PPP interface check on FreeBSD and possibly other systems So I'd suggest you to wait for 3.4.2 becoming the official port. The FreeBSD KDE team seems to be quite fast, so I'd expect this to be a question of days only. Norbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 09:36:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5798016A420 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:36:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from server.absolute-media.de (server.absolute-media.de [213.239.231.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8137E43D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:36:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569498C70D; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:36:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.absolute-media.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02622-10; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:36:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firewall.demig (p50839667.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.131.150.103]) by server.absolute-media.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A1F88C703; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:36:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ws-ew-3 (ws-ew-3.w2kdemig [192.168.1.72]) by firewall.demig (8.13.4/8.13.1) with SMTP id j6T9YUt7052607; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:34:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from NKoch@demig.de) From: "Norbert Koch" To: "=?iso-8859-1?B?RXJpayBOw7hyZ2FhcmQ=?=" , Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:34:30 +0200 Message-ID: <003701c59420$b861ab00$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at absolute-media.de Cc: Subject: RE: Dead disk? READ_DMA Failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:36:47 -0000 > I have a one year old Hitachi Travelstar 60GB/4200RPM disk. This > night and since then, I get these errors: > > ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=48926527 > ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=48926527 > ad0: FAILURE - READ_DMA timed out > > or > > ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=50299455 > ad0: FAILURE - READ_DMA status=51 > error=40 LBA=50299455 > > The LBA number varies, but otherwise it is consistent. Eventually > the device is removed from /dev and no disk is accessible, > although mount shows mounted devices. > > I have booted in single user mode and run fsck manually multiple > times to correct all found errors, most errors are on /, /usr and > some on /var, yet the problem reappears. > > I have tried to reinstall, toggling newfs to recreate /, /usr and > /var hoping that any bad blocks or sectors would be removed or > marked unusable. But the problem remains. > > Is there a way I can reformat or fix the disk so that broken areas > will not be used again? > > Please, how far from the grave are my data? > > Any suggestion on which new drive to choose? I have looked at > Western Digital Scorpio WD600VE 60 GB. > > Given the mentioned error, does this indicate an error that would > be covered by standard guarantee? after all the disk is just one > year old... > > The system: FreeBSD 5.4, Epia Mini-ITX CL1000, 256MB RAM, 60 GB > HDD. Hello, I've seen these error messages too. And also WRITE_DMA TIMEOUT! You may have a hardware problem, but I'm not convinced. I had these messages on _new_ computers from time to time. After updating from 5.2 to 5.3, 5.4 it seems to have gone for me. But that's obviously not the case for you. I've read on a list to try to disable acpi, but that does not help. A collegue of mine sees this even with his dvd! I've had it with a plain ata drive (maxtor) using udma100 and with a promise ata raid controller (wd drives) at udma66. All _new_ hardware! I can't tell you if it is some 5.X specific problem. But the systems I am running under 4.11 never had these problems. Is there someone on this list with similar experiences? Norbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 09:53:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEAF16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:53:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@math.ku.dk) Received: from imf.math.ku.dk (fw.math.ku.dk [130.225.103.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B44B43D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:53:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@math.ku.dk) Received: from imf.math.ku.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imf.math.ku.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F671B2B1 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:53:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from shannon.math.ku.dk (shannon.math.ku.dk [130.225.103.12]) by imf.math.ku.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:53:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:53:34 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=C3=B8rgaard?= To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Subject: Re: Dead disk? READ_DMA Failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:53:37 -0000 On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Erik N=C3=B8rgaard wrote: > The system: FreeBSD 5.4, Epia Mini-ITX CL1000, 256MB RAM, 60 GB > HDD. Sorry, I should have mentioned this in the original post, I have no monitor for my computer, I use it as a server. So I installed the disk in my laptop which is Intel/sis based, and still experienced the problem. I recall also seeing WRITE_DMA failure but I am not sure. I will order a new disk *sigh 5 days* and if I manage to bring life to the old one I will have a spare... Thanks for your advice so far. Cheers, Erik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 10:06:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 858C716A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:06:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nullpt@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F2643D49 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:06:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nullpt@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so591558wra for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:06:14 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cUd4+StdqsKA3mLQwSlfqDyzUiqqTj4IgxXd3uIY4n8PdXjbZ88hQZIMXOWX72ey7hJRyMfZHRrIy33rdntQgtcH8QeMpjWUAFsQz1GYNGknKjw9Ck/3O5bKFm0ktdCfDF5VLy1XC2FIa5MvLsoYkGApxeIOZAch5+YRvVDL4BU= Received: by 10.54.11.64 with SMTP id 64mr1018255wrk; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:06:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:06:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <755cb9fc050729030635ae70b8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:06:13 +0100 From: Alexandre Vieira To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20050729022549.041a8d10@cobalt.antimatter.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <755cb9fc05072815171ac8003@mail.gmail.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050728153729.156ff2d0@cobalt.antimatter.net> <755cb9fc050729003050edf7ef@mail.gmail.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050729003728.06268da0@cobalt.antimatter.net> <755cb9fc05072901482a22540c@mail.gmail.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050729022549.041a8d10@cobalt.antimatter.net> Subject: Re: Sendmail help needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alexandre Vieira List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:06:15 -0000 Hello Glenn, Thanks for your time. Well it is actually an issue. The reports are very important for our departments. They do not have access to see if the procedures went OK and as consequence they can't continue to work. If I can't get this to work with redundancy I will have to make some kind of script to change the A record for the mailhub, in our nameserver, when it's down so the backup mailserver can get with it's work. Any help on this issue is apreciated. On 7/29/05, Glenn Dawson wrote: > At 01:48 AM 7/29/2005, Alexandre Vieira wrote: > >Hello Glenn, > > > >The odds of the reporting system are not of my fully knowledge, I just > >know how and what mails go from where to who. > > > >Imagine that a script on a reporting machine does this: > > > ># mailx -s ERROR_FOUND_IN_PROC_SYNC syncproj > > > >It will try to deliver the mail locally, as suposed to. If I define a > >central hub or a Smart host it will deliver the mail I exampled to > >syncproj@mailhub and it works fine. The problem is that it won't > >lookup the mailhub MX record, It will send it directly to mailhub:25. > >Now imagine that mailhub is down? There is a backup server listed as > >an MX record for the mailhub domain with a higher pref that would take > >the work while mailhub prefered MX is down. >=20 > If that's all you're worried about, you don't have to worry. If you > specify a smart host and it's not available, the mail will get queued > locally until it is available. The default settings will hold it in the > queue for 5 days. If your smart host is down for that long, you probably > have other things to worry about. >=20 > -Glenn >=20 >=20 > >I've been reading a little more and I think there is some kind of > >feature/option that force a MX lookup on the mailhub host. > > > >Thank you > > > >On 7/29/05, Glenn Dawson wrote: > > > At 12:30 AM 7/29/2005, you wrote: > > > >Hello, > > > > > > > >Thanks for the help. > > > > > > > >The thing is that our main mailserver is not able to work with repor= ts > > > >from only one address. It has a db with some "names" that match > > > >name@ourinternaldomain.tld and then send the reports to the respecti= ve > > > >persons/mailing lists. > > > >So the basics of the question is: Is it possible to get every mail > > > >(including local mail) redirected to one domain with MX lookup? I've > > > >been reading about LUSER_RELAY, LOCAL_RELAY, stickyhost, but I don't > > > >know if this will solve the problem. > > > > > > ok, lets see if I understand this correctly... > > > > > > You have an existing mail server that handles mail for you local netw= ork. > > > Some of the mail sent to that server is compared to a database which = has > > > entries that look like somename@internaldomain.com. If a match is fo= und, > > > the message is redistributed to some list of email addresses. So far= so > > > good? hope so... > > > > > > The addresses that are looked at for a match, are they the from addre= ss or > > > the to address? > > > > > > For example, I send an email to you mail server using the address > > > user@foo.com. Since I sent the email, it looks like it came from > > > glenn@antimatter.net. One of those two addresses are compared to a > > > database to decide what to do with the message. From your descriptio= n, it > > > sounds like the To: address is the one being looked at by the mail se= rver. > > > > > > "Local" mail is normally considered to be mail between two addresses = which > > > are on the same machine. The from and to addresses for the local mai= l can > > > have only account names, or, one or both could have a domain associat= ed > > > with it. Potentially, mail between the following pairs of addresses = could > > > all be local: > > > > > > From: To: > > > foo bar > > > foo@internal.com bar > > > foo bar@internal.com > > > > > > From your description above, it sounds like you're looking at mail t= hat is > > > always delivered to the same address on the mail server, and then you= 're > > > using the address the mail was from to decide what to do with it. Is= that > > > correct? > > > > > > From the description below (from the original email) it sounds like = the > > > scripts in question are running on machines that are not the mail ser= ver, > > > and they're only specifying the username to deliver to, and not addin= g any > > > domain name or hostname to the recipient. Depending on what else is > > > happening on the machines that have the scripts that generate the mai= l, it > > > sounds like building a null client is probably the simplest thing to > > > do. Other options are using some of the masquerading features, or by= using > > > LOCAL_RELAY to force unqualified names to be send to a central server= which > > > will figure out what to do with them. > > > > > > Hope some of that helps...Let me know if I can clarify anything, I'll= be > > > around for at least another few hours... > > > > > > -Glenn > > > > > > > > > >On 7/28/05, Glenn Dawson wrote: > > > > > At 03:17 PM 7/28/2005, Alexandre Vieira wrote: > > > > > >Hello folks, > > > > > > > > > > > >I'm trying to get past a standard in sendmail which is very simp= le. > > > > > > > > > > > >I have several machines reporting mails trough local MTA's (send= mail) > > > > > >in each one of the boxes to our main mailserver. The thing is, I= did > > > > > >not developed the scripts and they are using "mailx -s us= er" > > > > > >which normally would try to deliver it to a local account in the > > > > > >machine. So the question is: Can I, in any way, define that ever= y > > > > > >"user" passed on the mailx in every script gets resolved to > > > > > >user@somedomain.tld and not to a local system account? We have > > > > > >hundreds of "names" in the scripts, so aliasing doesn't work for= me. > > > > > > > > > > If you don't _ever_ want things to be delivered locally, you can = create > > > > > what sendmail calls a null client. That will send all mail to th= e > > address > > > > > you specify. You can get more details from > > /usr/share/sendmail/cf/README > > > > > > > > > > -Glenn > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >My current hack is defining DR and DS in the sendmail.cf to a st= atic > > > > > >hostname but that takes redundancy to our mail system since if t= he > > > > > >main mailserver is down the backup mail server (higher MX) won't= take > > > > > >any effect. > > > > > > > > > > > >Any help apreciated > > > > > >Cheers > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > > > > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > > > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Thanks > > > >_______________________________________________ > > > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > >Alexandre Vieira - nullpt@gmail.com > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.= org" >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" >=20 --=20 Alexandre Vieira - nullpt@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 10:15:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145D816A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:15:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (blackend.org [212.11.35.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D1F43D4C for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:15:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from gothic.blackend.org (gothic.blackend.org [192.168.1.203]) by abigail.blackend.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6TAF472000741; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:15:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@abigail.blackend.org) Received: from gothic.blackend.org (localhost.blackend.org [127.0.0.1]) by gothic.blackend.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6TAF4lW000966; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:15:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@gothic.blackend.org) Received: (from marc@localhost) by gothic.blackend.org (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6TAF4Fg000965; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:15:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:15:03 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille To: Timothy Smith Message-ID: <20050729101503.GB800@gothic.blackend.org> References: <42E869DA.9020500@open-networks.net> <20050728092524.GA609@gothic.blackend.org> <42E9D7FB.2050401@open-networks.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42E9D7FB.2050401@open-networks.net> X-Useless-Header: blackend.org X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: problems burning multi session dvd-rw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:15:08 -0000 On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 05:17:15PM +1000, Timothy Smith wrote: > Marc Fonvieille wrote: > > >On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 03:15:06PM +1000, Timothy Smith wrote: > > > > > >>i'm having some troubles burning a multi session dvd-rw. i blanked te > >>dvd to make sure it was in sequential mode > >> > >>%dvd+rw-format /dev/cd0a -blank > >>* DVD\uffffRW format utility by , version 4.9. > >>* 4.7GB DVD-RW media in Sequential mode detected. > >>* blanking 100.0| > >> > >> > >> > >[...] > > > >Try to upgrade to a more up to date version of dvd+rw-tools and try with > >-blank=full option. > > > >Marc > > > > > > > > > i cvsup'd to the latest and still the same thing, any ideas? Did you use "-blank=full" or "-blank"? Did you have the same issue with all DVD-RW brands? Is your DVD burner firmware up to date? Is your DVD burner mentioned on dvd+rw-tools' hardware page? Marc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 10:32:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C463716A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:32:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1741343D49 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:31:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [82.41.37.55] ([82.41.37.55]) by smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:32:43 +0100 Message-ID: <42EA059D.5080102@dial.pipex.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:31:57 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050530 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin Lutz , dick hoogendijk References: <20050729002602.65ff60bb.dick@nagual.st> <42E96319.3080901@datacomm.ch> In-Reply-To: <42E96319.3080901@datacomm.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jul 2005 10:32:43.0593 (UTC) FILETIME=[DA88D390:01C59428] Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: need some advice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:32:00 -0000 Benjamin Lutz wrote: >If price is important, why not go for a Sempron 3100+ using the Palermo >core? Granted, it's a bit slower than the Athlon64 3000+, but it does >have an advantage: Under load, it outputs 62W of heat instead of 89W >like the 130nm Athlon64 cores. And of course it only costs half of what >the Athlon64s cost. > > A64 90nm under 3500 are 67W *max*, only larger are 89W max (http://www.amdcompare.com/us-en/desktop/Default.aspx). Modern A64 are 90nm (look for Venice core). I have no experience of Sempron, but I can say that I would be very surprised if you can get an A64 to actually *use* all those watts. The highest temperature I can get is by running a CPU exercizer designed to drive up temp. That gets ~5 degrees C above the maximum I have ever seen otherwise (and it's still cooler than an XP). At 19 degrees ambient, the CPU is at 27 degrees under low load (89 W theoretical max). Prescott core will use *more* than the specified watts under load (possibly up to 120 IIRC). See http://www.silentpcreview.com/article169-page2.html dick hoogendijk wrote: >My options are: > >Athlon64-3000+ (Newcastle) on a MSI K8T NEO-FSR board (1Gb 3200 mem) >Athlon64-3400+ (Clawhammer on the same board > Why are these your processor options? The Venice core has been around a while now and the 3000 is *fairly* cheap (and pretty much identical in price to older cores when I looked a couple months back). I'm pretty sure this is Venice but you'd have to check the part no at AMD http://www.komplett.nl/k/kl.asp?bn=10483 >I.e. the intel MB has a PCIe grahics slot. How important is that (or >not). I will buy a Geforce-6600GT videocard (offer most for less >money..) > PCI-E will give you much better performance on modern games and you can have two cards IIUC, but I do not know about FreeBSD compatibility. I went for 6600GT AGP which I am more than happy with (but I tend to buy games 2-3 years after they were popular :-)). >I will run FreebSD on it (compile a lot of ports) and (windows-xp/98se) >for gaming. > Are you sure 98se will support A64? Also just about to run out of support from MS (if it hasn't already). XP does have 95 and 98 compatibility mode for games etc. but I can't say how well it works. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 11:09:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C04016A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:09:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kl@os.lv) Received: from paipala.latnet.lv (paipala.latnet.lv [159.148.1.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A21443D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:09:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kl@os.lv) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by paipala.latnet.lv (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D032511F8 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:09:15 +0300 (EEST) Received: from paipala.latnet.lv ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (paipala.latnet.lv [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02291-04 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:09:15 +0300 (EEST) Received: from os.lv (unknown [159.148.155.3]) by paipala.latnet.lv (Postfix) with SMTP id 13B5D511DB for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:09:15 +0300 (EEST) Received: from 192.168.1.21 ([192.168.1.21]) by os.lv (WinRoute Pro 4.1) with SMTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:12:02 +0300 Message-ID: <42EA3888.5040100@os.lv> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:09:12 +0300 From: Casper User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050720) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.2.1 (20041222) at latnet.lv Subject: gmirror synchronization... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:09:12 -0000 Hi, I have setuped two disks for mirror: #gmirror label -v -b round-robin www-mirror /dev/ad6 #gmirror insert www-mirror /dev/ad4 after reboot it not mounting nad synchronizing ~ 1% in minute... #gmirror list Geom name: www-mirror State: DEGRADED Components: 2 Balance: round-robin Slice: 4096 Flags: NONE GenID: 0 SyncID: 1 ID: 2896798894 Providers: 1. Name: mirror/www-mirror Mediasize: 200049647104 (186G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r1w0e0 Consumers: 1. Name: ad6 Mediasize: 200049647616 (186G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r1w1e1 State: ACTIVE Priority: 0 Flags: NONE GenID: 0 SyncID: 1 ID: 1503457719 2. Name: ad4 Mediasize: 200049647616 (186G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r1w1e1 State: SYNCHRONIZING Priority: 0 Flags: DIRTY, SYNCHRONIZING GenID: 0 SyncID: 1 Synchronized: 3% ID: 564911442 Why so long if there is only ~7mb on disk yet... How to properly start and mount after reboot it? tnx, C. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 12:21:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8300F16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:21:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry.mityugov@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3BFD43D48 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:21:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry.mityugov@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so609533wra for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 05:21:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AxzfMfbxDUzFwb9amG3hj9LJEcN0j0GTgZRxNYZ25mDXr7++DWv20KS6Kb+LlVFnCbrXS/5YVek9m0g7ngZg0GDy87wjTQkqzsaJGRjcaOlg6RwV5D4kbZY/fPh1gDGHpeJShBk208oeaOTm7ZMBgShXRUjTYQPpVm3FIjSVHoA= Received: by 10.54.11.11 with SMTP id 11mr1275139wrk; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 05:21:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.56.33 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 05:21:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:21:21 +0400 From: Dmitry Mityugov To: Jesus Romero In-Reply-To: <11aa082005072807243176c487@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <11aa082005072511195ad1e22f@mail.gmail.com> <11aa082005072807243176c487@mail.gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: filesystem creation problem during the installation process. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dmitry Mityugov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:21:22 -0000 On 7/28/05, Jesus Romero wrote: > Hi Dmitry, Thanks a lot to answer my question... >=20 > This what I've done so far. > 1- I already tried to create a small partition for MSDOS, so FreeBSD > could get the correct geometry, but didn't work. > 2- I already changed to LBA access to my HD. but didn't work. > 3- I disarmament my computer complete so the BIOS could take my HD as > a new drive. but didn't work. > 4- Every event upon my HD (like left itself without any format) so > FreeBSD can take it as a new HD. But didn't work. >=20 > The FreeBSD version that I is 5.3. I bought this version under the > "Mundo Linux" magazine. >=20 > Here the details of the hardware: > IDE Primary Master: Segate 10GB, the geometry between BIOs and > FreeBSD are equals so far. > IDE Secondary Master: CDROM 56k > 128 RAM. > AMD 750GHz. > even, I had intalled WinXP (a shit) but NOT ANYMORE !! forever. Btw, > it worked fine there with that hardware. >=20 > Pls help me !!, this has taken for my during 1 month trying install > it without luck !!. > Any help I'll appreciate. > Jerori ! >=20 > On 7/26/05, Dmitry Mityugov wrote: > > On 7/25/05, Jesus Romero wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have the following issue: > > > > > > Once I've chosen in the sysinstall main menu: > > > 1- Standart Installation > > > 2- ad0 as selected drive. > > > 3- I've deleted the current partitions there and created a new one fo= r > > > Freebsd using "Use Entire Disk". But I have to click S to define this > > > slice as ACTIVE partition and that's it. Click Q. > > > 4- I use "Fdisk Partition Using Entire Disk" I click "A" as default > > > partition. Click Q. > > > 5- I select Standar like Boot Manager for drive ad0. > > > 6- For Choose Distribution, I choose ALL. > > > 7- For Choose Media, I choose CD/DVD. > > > 8- And after I got the following warning: > > > > > > User Confirmation Requested > > > Last Chance! Are you SURE you want to continue the installation? > > > If you're running this on a disk with data you wish to save then WE > > > STRONGLY ENCOURAGE YOU TO MAKE PROPER BACKUPS before proceeding! > > > We can take no responsibility for lost disk contents! > > > [ Yes ] No > > > > > > 9- I chose, YES, and I've always gotten the following message. > > > > > > [ Unable to find device node for /dev/ad0s1b in /dev > > > Creation of filesystem will be aborted ] > > > > > > 10- I've tried a lot alternatives, but without luck!! > > > > How big is the drive? What does happen if you create a smaller > > partition for the OS at the beginning of the drive instead of using > > the entire drive? I am out of ideas, sorry. You may try a newer version of FreeBSD, or another media. By the way, you should send your replies not only to who replied to your messages (me), but also to the mailing list - this will increase your chances to get better answers. --=20 Dmitry Mityugov, St. Petersburg, Russia I ignore all messages with confidentiality statements "We live less by imagination than despite it" - Rockwell Kent, "N by E" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 12:47:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CB016A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:47:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9499343D48 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:47:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend3.messagingengine.com (frontend3.internal [10.202.2.152]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282C1CC5A00 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:47:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Sasl-enc: dMjJsPu1jo/mj1omXlf1QodICEd7f6ioU8N6l84bBaDV 1122641223 Received: from gumby.localdomain (dsl-80-41-71-209.access.as9105.com [80.41.71.209]) by frontend3.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E070D1EF for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:47:03 -0400 (EDT) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:47:00 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <20050729002602.65ff60bb.dick@nagual.st> <20050729083540.GA66756@lothlorien.nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <20050729083540.GA66756@lothlorien.nagual.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507291347.00583.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: need some advice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:47:06 -0000 On Friday 29 July 2005 09:35, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > Windows just for gaming to me means w98se. It's faster, smoother and > smaller. One problem problem with w98 is that it has problems with modern amounts of memory. I have a similar w98/freebsd dual-boot with AMD64 2.8G and 1.5 GB of ram, and I have to limit Windows to 1GB of memory or it wont boot. That's not a major loss, but it may be neccessary to remove a stick when reinstalling. One point about the AMD 64. At the moment I'm running the i386 version of FreeBSD, because it's generally better supported. I think it's worth checking the amd64 mailing list for compatibility problems so you can keep your options open - particularly as you are keeping the hardware for a long time. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 14:30:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0299E16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:30:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72FCE43D66 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:30:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j6SEUchQ031094; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:30:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:30:38 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: "Gary W. Swearingen" Message-ID: <20050728143038.GC81656@dan.emsphone.com> References: <27dbfc8c05072723541955ba02@mail.gmail.com> <42E8B777.7010908@datacomm.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:07:58 +0000 Cc: Benjamin Lutz , questions@freebsd.org, Valerio daelli Subject: Re: Grub not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:30:44 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 28), Gary W. Swearingen said: > Benjamin Lutz writes: > > Two guesses: > > > > - You can't write to a disks MBR while it's being used. I've seen > > this myself, but I'm not exactly why this is, or how it can be > > circumvented (other than booting from another device). > > Yes. It wasn't always this way. It's easy to turn off, though, and is even documented in grub's pkg-message file: To install GRUB on the master boot record of your hard drive use 'grub-install ' command. NOTE: Don't forget to run 'sysctl kern.geom.debugflags=16' on 5.x and -CURRENT to enable writing in hard disk system areas. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 21:34:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E07E716A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:34:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bettan@nerim.net) Received: from kraid.nerim.net (smtp-104-thursday.nerim.net [62.4.16.104]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E57F43D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:34:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bettan@nerim.net) Received: from webmail.nerim.net (archimonde.nerim.net [62.4.16.97]) by kraid.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6087D40EF0; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:33:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ::ffff:62.212.96.206 (proxying for 192.168.1.3) (SquirrelMail authenticated user bettan) by webmail.nerim.net with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:33:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <60826.::ffff:62.212.96.206.1122586431.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:33:51 +0200 (CEST) From: bettan@nerim.net To: chris@sigd.net User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:07:58 +0000 Cc: Subject: Samba over VPN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:34:02 -0000 There is a bridge device on BSD1 and on GW-FLO.This is good for a bridge vpn. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 01:32:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D2D16A428 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:32:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618C043D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:32:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.246.232] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A72A2E7300C4; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:32:26 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6T1XREa079826; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:33:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6T1XL3w079825; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:33:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: Dave McCammon , Ian Smith , Chuck Swiger References: <20050728204032.71440.qmail@web32812.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:33:21 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20050728204032.71440.qmail@web32812.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (Dave McCammon's message of "Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:40:32 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:07:58 +0000 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can someone clarify ipfw's in/out/recv/xmit/via concepts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:32:32 -0000 Dave McCammon writes: > Here is a link to a thread that help me to understand > the in/out/recv/xmit stuff. Thanks guys. I think I've "got" most of it now. Incoming packets are those entering the OS kernel implementing the ipfw firewall, but not necessarily those entering the ipfw firewall each time the kernel uses it. Outgoing packets are those leaving. Depending upon firewall config, the firewall can test packets one or two times as they enter the kernel, considering them as incoming, and one or two times as they exit the kernel, considering them as outgoing. (See ipfw diagram.) An exception is that when bridging, it tests packets only once, considering them as incoming only. (The latter based on my tests.) When it tests an incoming packet it doesn't try to predict which interface it will be transmitted on (not sure why, if NAT isn't on), so "in" rules don't match against an "xmit" interface. When it tests an outgoing packet, it knows which interface it was received on and which interface it will be transmitted on so "out" rules may match against both "recv" and "xmit" interfaces. Using "via if0" is like using three rules: "in recv if0", "out xmit if0", and "out recv if0". Using "out via if0" is like using two rules: "out xmit if0" and "out recv if0". Using "in via if0" is like using "in recv if0". I'm not claiming that the above is any better than the manpage; I'm just trying to quickly hang some simple "facts" out there to be shot down if untrue. (Maybe someday I'll set up a routing firewall to test more of them than I have yet.) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 13:13:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B350016A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:13:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from the.lists@mgm51.com) Received: from oneyou.mcmli.com (oneyou.mcmli.com [216.194.67.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C14443D48 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:13:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from the.lists@mgm51.com) Received: from sentry.24cl.com (pcp01267574pcs.danbry01.ct.comcast.net [68.63.157.203]) by oneyou.mcmli.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9FF5B86 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:13:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from XPMM (unknown [63.119.50.193]) by sentry.24cl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB4E50ED for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:13:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <200507290913490593.03B78D69@sentry.24cl.com> In-Reply-To: <200507281157.42688.bob89@eng.ufl.edu> References: <200507281157.42688.bob89@eng.ufl.edu> X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.00.1081 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (P) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:13:49 -0400 From: "MikeM" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:13:40 -0000 On 7/28/2005 at 11:57 AM Bob Johnson wrote: |Microsoft used to claim that NTFS doesn't need defragmentation. |Compared to MSDOSFS, that's a reasonably accurate statement, but |if you push it hard enough, it will still become fragmented. ============= The process of installing Windows on a clean disk leaves the disk in need of defragmenting. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 13:47:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23E616A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:47:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8D243D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:47:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:47:26 +0200 id 00000088.42EA336E.00010A1A Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:47:26 +0200 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20050729134726.GA68096@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <20050729002602.65ff60bb.dick@nagual.st> <42E96BBB.1000809@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42E96BBB.1000809@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: Dick Hoogendijk Subject: Re: need some advice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:47:29 -0000 On 28 Jul Trevor Sullivan wrote: > I would recommend purchasing an Athlon 64 3000+ Venice core. I just > picked one of these up along with 2 gigs of ram and a 6600GT and it > runs sooooooo nice. Not only that, but it's cheap. I tend to switch to this 3000+ Venice core thing. Problem is finding a motherboard that ALSO is fully supported by FreeBSD. It seems lots of those 939 boards are not ;-( If you are running fbsd, which motherboard did you choose? Finding the rest is no problem ;-) -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 13:58:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC65216A452 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:58:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daniel@stiw.org) Received: from smtp.conceptual.net.au (grimiore.conceptual.net.au [203.190.192.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F56E43D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:58:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daniel@stiw.org) Received: from spock.enterprise.prvt (202-137-107-088.adsl.usertools.net [202.137.107.88]) by smtp.conceptual.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id C404313947 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:58:16 +0800 (WST) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200507281157.42688.bob89@eng.ufl.edu> <200507290913490593.03B78D69@sentry.24cl.com> Message-ID: From: "Daniel Marsh" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:58:15 +0800 In-Reply-To: <200507290913490593.03B78D69@sentry.24cl.com> User-Agent: Opera M2/8.0 (Win32, build 7561) Subject: Re: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:58:20 -0000 On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:13:49 +0800, MikeM wrote: > On 7/28/2005 at 11:57 AM Bob Johnson wrote: > > |Microsoft used to claim that NTFS doesn't need defragmentation. > |Compared to MSDOSFS, that's a reasonably accurate statement, but > |if you push it hard enough, it will still become fragmented. > ============= > > The process of installing Windows on a clean disk leaves the disk in > need of defragmenting. As he said, "if you push it hard enough, it will still become fragmented" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 14:35:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E758616A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:35:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ms@probsd.org) Received: from probsd.org (rrcs-24-199-182-230.midsouth.biz.rr.com [24.199.182.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9287143D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:35:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ms@probsd.org) Received: from localhost (jail [192.168.1.4]) by probsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507689E025; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:35:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from probsd.org ([192.168.1.4]) by localhost (jail [192.168.1.4]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04303-10; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:35:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from probsd.org (jail [192.168.1.4]) by probsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693319DDC7; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:35:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 192.168.1.1 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ms) by probsd.org with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:35:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1784.192.168.1.1.1122647757.squirrel@probsd.org> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:35:57 -0400 (EDT) From: "Michael Sharp" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: Subject: Need a good Unix script that.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:35:47 -0000 I need a simple sh script that will daily (via cron) crawl a website looking for multiple keywords, then reporting those keyword results and URL to an email address. Anyone know of a pre-written script that does this, or point me in the right direction in using the FreeBSD core commands that can accomplish this? Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 14:41:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC2B16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:41:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alec@thened.net) Received: from splinter.bowdoin.edu (splinter.bowdoin.edu [139.140.181.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BDDD43D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:41:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alec@thened.net) Received: by splinter.bowdoin.edu (Postfix, from userid 12008) id 34BD3C180; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:41:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:41:43 -0400 From: Alec Berryman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050729144143.GD95134@thened.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <42EA3888.5040100@os.lv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RpqchZ26BWispMcB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42EA3888.5040100@os.lv> X-Ned-Wuz-Here: Yes X-GPG-Fingerprint: 3DB5 8785 53D9 8BF4 5049 B6B9 02E7 7FD9 881C 85C4 X-GPG-Key: http://www.thened.net/~alec/static/alec.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: Re: gmirror synchronization... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:41:44 -0000 --RpqchZ26BWispMcB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Casper on 2005-07-29 17:09:12 +0300: > I have setuped two disks for mirror: > #gmirror label -v -b round-robin www-mirror /dev/ad6 > #gmirror insert www-mirror /dev/ad4 That's not a complete gmirror setup that will load on boot. You should see http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/mirror/ for a thorough tutorial. > Why so long if there is only ~7mb on disk yet... gmirror is not aware of the filesystem used with it. When you synchronize the disks, it's not copy ~7mb of files, it's copying bit-for-bit the contents of one disk/partition to another. --RpqchZ26BWispMcB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC6kAnAud/2YgchcQRAjNcAJ9DGjojdBrqq9UM7Nd0kBaUmbZ+TACfZL8s 0g6TwbgQTFudiiKnF3VlWqI= =MfuK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RpqchZ26BWispMcB-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 14:44:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F307C16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:44:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-04-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-04-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9C843D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:44:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (cpe-65-31-44-187.woh.res.rr.com [65.31.44.187]) by ms-smtp-04-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id j6TEi8HH021791 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:44:08 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000701c5944b$ce270950$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "dave" To: Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:42:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: dhclient ddns update script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:44:13 -0000 Hello, Does anyone have a dhclient updater script that calls nsupdate whenever the external IP changes? I've got an external IP, which changes occationally, usually at an inopportune time, i want a dhclient-hook, can't remember the fullname of that, that will notify the ddns server and update an A record. Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 14:57:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891CE16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:57:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@reusel.de) Received: from azure.internetking.de (internetking.de [213.239.216.77]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8A843D48 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:57:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@reusel.de) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (p54819A98.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.129.154.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by azure.internetking.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9B61AEB for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:57:19 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9605C837-6245-4C2D-A8D8-A423901C5BB1@reusel.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Reisenweber?= Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:57:12 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) Subject: How to restore MBR / boot0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:57:22 -0000 Hi list, I know the command how to restore the MBR ('fdisk -B -b /boot/boot0 =20 ad0), but know this stupid question of mine (Windows has overwritten =20 the old MBR with its own): How do I manage to get to a working prompt =20= with at least some useful commands such as 'mount' available? I tried =20= the fixit shell from my 5.4-bootonly disk but that didn't help me =20 very much. :/ Please help! :) J=F6rg= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 15:03:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D9C16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:03:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D079143D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:03:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [82.41.37.55] ([82.41.37.55]) by smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:03:50 +0100 Message-ID: <42EA4528.8010400@dial.pipex.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:03:04 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050530 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dick Hoogendijk References: <20050729002602.65ff60bb.dick@nagual.st> <42E96BBB.1000809@gmail.com> <20050729134726.GA68096@lothlorien.nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <20050729134726.GA68096@lothlorien.nagual.st> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jul 2005 15:03:50.0819 (UTC) FILETIME=[BA8E8730:01C5944E] Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: need some advice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:03:07 -0000 Dick Hoogendijk wrote: >On 28 Jul Trevor Sullivan wrote: > > >>I would recommend purchasing an Athlon 64 3000+ Venice core. I just >>picked one of these up along with 2 gigs of ram and a 6600GT and it >>runs sooooooo nice. Not only that, but it's cheap. >> >> > >I tend to switch to this 3000+ Venice core thing. Problem is finding a >motherboard that ALSO is fully supported by FreeBSD. It seems lots of >those 939 boards are not ;-( > >If you are running fbsd, which motherboard did you choose? > > ASUS A8V Deluxe (no wifi). However, I think any VIA k8t800Pro should basically work. Upside: Twin SATA RAID (VIA + Promise) and legacy IDE; working Gigabit Ethernet; PS/2 keyboard + mouse; one serial port; 6 USB2 (untested, but worked in XP); passive northbridge cooling (i.e. no noisy fan); firewire (untested). Downside: bad ACPI: power down works, suspend untested, thermal info completely missing. acpidump -t produces "acpidump: RSDT entry 2 (sig OEMB) is corrupt" before reading everything. However, apic works afaik. Only one HDD activity connector There is an SLI version but I have no idea if that's FreeBSD compatible. Runs FreeBSD i386 5.4 just fine. My experience in choosing motherboards is that only a motherboard with virtually nothing on it is "fully" supported. When I chose this one the gigabit ethernet wasn't supported, but that just wasn't important enough to me. Then support came along :-) Overall, I am happy because I haven't seen anything else that would be better. If you intend overclocking then it seems that MSI is a popular choice, but no idea about other hardware on those boards. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 15:06:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5CE16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:06:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14A243D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:06:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [82.41.37.55] ([82.41.37.55]) by smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:07:25 +0100 Message-ID: <42EA45FF.1030301@dial.pipex.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:06:39 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050530 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Reisenweber?= References: <9605C837-6245-4C2D-A8D8-A423901C5BB1@reusel.de> In-Reply-To: <9605C837-6245-4C2D-A8D8-A423901C5BB1@reusel.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jul 2005 15:07:25.0991 (UTC) FILETIME=[3ACF2B70:01C5944F] Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: How to restore MBR / boot0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:06:41 -0000 J=F6rg Reisenweber wrote: > Hi list, > > I know the command how to restore the MBR ('fdisk -B -b /boot/boot0 =20 > ad0), but know this stupid question of mine (Windows has overwritten =20 > the old MBR with its own): How do I manage to get to a working prompt = > with at least some useful commands such as 'mount' available? I tried = > the fixit shell from my 5.4-bootonly disk but that didn't help me =20 > very much. :/ http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=3D611111+617364+/usr/local/ww= w/db/text/2005/freebsd-questions/20050626.freebsd-questions --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 15:22:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1009916A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:22:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9DE543D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:22:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9D85C45; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:22:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 68985-08; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:22:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-54-113.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.54.113]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A81F5E8D; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:22:29 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42EA49B8.4070804@mac.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:22:32 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Sharp References: <1784.192.168.1.1.1122647757.squirrel@probsd.org> In-Reply-To: <1784.192.168.1.1.1122647757.squirrel@probsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need a good Unix script that.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:22:34 -0000 Michael Sharp wrote: > I need a simple sh script that will daily (via cron) crawl a website > looking for multiple keywords, then reporting those keyword results and > URL to an email address. > > Anyone know of a pre-written script that does this, or point me in the > right direction in using the FreeBSD core commands that can accomplish > this? If you feed the webserver's access log into various programs like analog, these will report on the keywords people used to search for when linking into the site. (This is not quite what you asked for, but I mention it because the suggestion might be closer to what you want to see... :-) Anyway, if you do not own the site & have access to the logfiles, you ought to honor things like /robots.txt and the site's policies with regard to copyright and datamining, but you could easily use lynx, curl, or anything similiar which supports a recursive/web-spider download capability, and then grep for keywords, do histograms, whatever on the content you DL. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 15:24:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0CC16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:24:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@reusel.de) Received: from azure.internetking.de (internetking.de [213.239.216.77]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2578C43D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:24:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@reusel.de) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (p54819A98.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.129.154.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by azure.internetking.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F38E1AEB; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:24:26 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <42EA45FF.1030301@dial.pipex.com> References: <9605C837-6245-4C2D-A8D8-A423901C5BB1@reusel.de> <42EA45FF.1030301@dial.pipex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Message-Id: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Reisenweber?= Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:24:32 +0200 To: Alex Zbyslaw X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: How to restore MBR / boot0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:24:27 -0000 Am 29.07.2005 um 17:06 schrieb Alex Zbyslaw: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=3D611111+617364+/usr/=20 > local/www/db/text/2005/freebsd-questions/20050626.freebsd-questions > Thank you, Alex. Problem solved - System is back up. :-D J=F6rg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 15:26:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F97D16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:26:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vdm.fbsd@virgilio.it) Received: from vsmtp3.tin.it (vsmtp3alice.tin.it [212.216.176.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1156E43D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:26:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vdm.fbsd@virgilio.it) Received: from [192.168.10.8] (80.117.237.253) by vsmtp3.tin.it (7.2.060.1) id 42E5E1E2001B00D3 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:26:24 +0200 From: Vittorio De Martino To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:25:33 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <42DC14FE0003EB30@ims1d.cp.tin.it> In-Reply-To: <42DC14FE0003EB30@ims1d.cp.tin.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507291725.33854.vdm.fbsd@virgilio.it> Subject: Re: Problems with booting & MBR X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:26:27 -0000 Alle 11:16, gioved=EC 28 luglio 2005, vdm.fbsd@virgilio.it ha scritto: > In the first disk ad0 (master) of a computer at office I had installed > linux to be used as a postgresql server. Later I installed FreeBSD 5.4 > (just to have a go at it) on a partition of the second disk ad1 (slave) = to > be a postgrresql server too. > Linux lilo was the boot loader, booting linux by default and freebsd. > Now, convinced of the high quality of the latter I eliminated linux from > the first disk unfortunately without modifying lilo, and reshuffled the > FreeBSD filesystem as in my latest /etc/fstab using also the first disk: > > # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump =20 > Pass# /dev/ad1s2b none swap sw 0 = =20 > 0 /dev/ad1s2a / ufs rw 1 = =20 > 1 /dev/ad0s1a /usr/local ufs rw 0 = 0 > /dev/ad0s1d /var ufs rw 0 0 > /dev/ad0s1e /tmp ufs rw 0 0 > /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 > > Now, even though I read the booting procedure in the handbook and somewhe= re > else in the internet, issuing the various "fdisk -b B", "disklabel -b ..", > "boot0cfg ..", I was completely unable to modify the MBR and make this > FreeBSD only computer boot directly into this OS. > > What should I do with the configuration I have? > A straightforward and step by step explanation is highly appreciated. > > P.S. Is it possible that some problems can arise by the fact that I used > an "a" slice (ad0s1a)for mounting /usr/local and freebsd starts from > ad1s1a? > > =20 =46riends,=20 as suggested in the docs in the internet I tried both with = =20 # fdisk -B -b /boot/boot0 ad0 fdisk: cannot open disk /dev/ad0: No such file or directory and with = =20 # fdisk -B -b /boot/boot0 ad1 fdisk: cannot open disk /dev/ad1: No such file or directory WHILST my working /etc/fstab is, as I mentioned before: # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pas= s# /dev/ad1s2b none swap sw 0 0 /dev/ad1s2a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/ad0s1a /usr/local ufs rw 0 0 /dev/ad0s1d /var ufs rw 0 0 /dev/ad0s1e /tmp ufs rw 0 0 Why FreeBSD 5.4 cannot find /dev/ad0 and ad1? What should I do? =20 A baffled and frustated Vittorio again From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 15:30:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB35116A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:30:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wayne@etaq.com) Received: from etaq.com (mail.etaq.com [66.80.150.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541B243D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:30:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wayne@etaq.com) Received: by etaq.com (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 76A841706C; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:30:45 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:30:45 -0500 From: Wayne M Barnes To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050729153045.GA43916@etaq.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Java 1.5.0 can't fine jre X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:30:50 -0000 Dear FreeBSD, I have just installed the alpha version of jdk15. I set JDK_HOME to /usr/local/jdk1.5.0 instead of /usr/local/jdk1.4.2, and I also changed my path to include jdk1.5.0/bin. But when I try to invoke java or javac, I get the following errors: wayne@-little-etaq:/home/wayne/classes>javac -d . ../src/Colorme.java Error: could not find libjava.so Error: could not find Java 2 Runtime Environment. < note that my JDK_HOME is properly set: > wayne@-little-etaq:/home/wayne/classes>echo $JDK_HOME /usr/local/jdk1.5.0 Is there a new name for JDK_HOME, or have I missed something else? I can see a jre/ directory in /usr/local/jdk1.5.0 just fine. Why can't java see it? -- Wayne M Barnes wayne@etaq.com fax: (314) 754-9556 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 16:27:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F02116A434 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:27:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpk@dpk.net) Received: from shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net [207.246.149.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37CE43D4C for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:27:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpk@dpk.net) Received: from shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6TGRCrR085876 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:27:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dpk@localhost) by shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id j6TGRBQc085873 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:27:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net: dpk owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:27:11 -0700 (PDT) From: dpk X-X-Sender: dpk@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050729003005.GA99178@gothmog.gr> Message-ID: <20050729091412.V79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> References: <20050719145822.W23753@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <441x5tk3e9.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20050720064637.Q23753@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <20050721100327.GA16179@beatrix.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20050728154356.A79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <20050728225701.GB46755@gothmog.gr> <20050728155804.T79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <20050728231035.GA60181@gothmog.gr> <20050728161608.Q79761@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <20050729003005.GA99178@gothmog.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: Large filesystem woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:27:13 -0000 The resolution to this problem turned out to be enabling the 3Ware 9500S "auto carving" option. This splits all partitions into 2TB chunks, which are then presented to the OS as separate LUNs. FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE's driver for the 3Ware card does not support multiple LUNs, but the new driver (Common Layer) in 5.4-STABLE does. So if you're running in to this same problem, here's a quick run down of what you need to do: 1) Enable auto-carving in either the 3ware BIOS or in the 3dm web control panel. 2) Delete and then re-create any RAID that is larger than 2TB, that you want accessable from the OS. If you have sufficient drives available, you can migrate the data to a new RAID, instead of deleting. 3) Install 5.4-RELEASE. sysinstall will show you a single 2TB device. Feel free to use that device however you wish -- you can fill it to its boundaries. 4) cvsup to 5.4-STABLE, make buildworld buildkernel installkernel, reboot. 5) You'll now see da1 and perhaps da2 and beyond, in dmesg or camcontrol devlist. If you should ever have to reboot into the 5.4-RELEASE GENERIC kernel, the da1..n partitions will be unavailable. da0, however, will operate normally. As such it is safe to use as a boot device. (For sanity's sake it is probably best to create a much smaller slice or partition for system files, but that's your decision). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 16:30:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8227616A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:30:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mw@theatre.sax.de) Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF1B43D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:30:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mw@theatre.sax.de) Received: from sax.sax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sax.sax.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6TGU9QO030638 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:30:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mw@theatre.sax.de) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) with UUCP id j6TGU9d9030637 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:30:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mw@theatre.sax.de) Received: from theatre.sax.de (mw@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by theatre.sax.de (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6TGIXFU053317 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:18:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mw@theatre.sax.de) Received: (from mw@localhost) by theatre.sax.de (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6TGIXJD053316 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:18:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mw) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:18:33 +0200 From: Martin Welk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050729161833.GD934@theatre.sax.de> References: <20050729153045.GA43916@etaq.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050729153045.GA43916@etaq.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: A68A 4D93 9F68 5FF4 6479 31C9 BE63 C062 1622 A53B User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: Re: Java 1.5.0 can't fine jre X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:30:12 -0000 On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 10:30:45AM -0500, Wayne M Barnes wrote: > < note that my JDK_HOME is properly set: > Yes, but shouldn't it be JAVA_HOME? With that set, mine seems to work fine. Regards, Martin -- ,,Oh, there's a lot of opportunities, if you're knowing to take them, you know, there's a lot of opportunities, if there aren't you can make them, make or break them!'' (Tennant/Lowe) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 16:33:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B579E16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:33:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matthew@thebunker.net) Received: from male.aldigital.co.uk (male.thebunker.net [213.129.64.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301B343D48 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:33:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matthew@thebunker.net) Received: from lack-of-gravitas.thebunker.net (gateway.ash.thebunker.net [213.129.64.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by male.aldigital.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12C29765E; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:33:05 +0100 (BST) Received: from lack-of-gravitas.thebunker.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lack-of-gravitas.thebunker.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6TGX3CW075346; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:33:03 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@lack-of-gravitas.thebunker.net) Received: (from matthew@localhost) by lack-of-gravitas.thebunker.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6TGX0s9075345; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:33:00 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:33:00 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Bryan Maynard Message-ID: <20050729163300.GA79272@lack-of-gravitas.thebunker.net> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Bryan Maynard , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050727144308.99544.qmail@web61214.mail.yahoo.com> <20050727103809.I87833@makeworld.com> <200507281356.01019.kirk@strauser.com> <200507281551.51165.bryan.maynard@reallm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200507281551.51165.bryan.maynard@reallm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: huh? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:33:07 -0000 --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 03:51:50PM +0000, Bryan Maynard wrote: > On Thursday 28 July 2005 06:55 pm, Kirk Strauser wrote: > > On Wednesday 27 July 2005 10:39, Chris wrote: > > > > Do you have curses like "cisco rhce msce CCNA" , maybe > > > > for free ? >=20 > > > YOU - are an idiot... Read the list name... FreeBSD Questions... >=20 > > I think he meant to ask, "are there FreeBSD certifications similar to > > RHCE, MSCE, etc.?", which is a perfectly legitimate question. Don't > > be so quick to anger. >=20 > Thank you for saying that. I'd actually be interested in FreeBSD=20 > certification. I've learned a lot, but there's still so much I don't=20 > know :-) It's coming, but it's not quite here yet. Check out http://www.bsdcertification.org/ Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 8 Dane Court Manor School Rd PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Tilmanstone Tel: +44 1304 617253 Kent, CT14 0JL UK --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUBQupaPJr7OpndfbmCAQIK7QQAmI2r1uW0VCAbl/bICkgghmiZtFAN6bf6 vDYsJwHdCQ4uF6LRpKIoROQm14nIxSpW3Nk1tGQXLVX5cNNC3Ctr/JRo0orbW4E4 Skf/AdR5n5flAbUysgiCTmWGLgwY95JeGWjzKZIshpkCQbDQ7xvMA+THur+1vQcY meCB2cwv43E= =eSg7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 17:02:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id CD54E16A420; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:02:00 +0000 (GMT) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20050729170200.CD54E16A420@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:02:00 +0000 (GMT) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: How to get best results from FreeBSD-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:02:00 -0000 How to get the best results from FreeBSD questions. =================================================== Last update $Date: 2004/09/19 02:40:48 $ This is a regular posting to the FreeBSD questions mailing list. If you got it in answer to a message you sent, it means that the sender thinks that at least one of the following things was wrong with your message: - You left out a subject line, or the subject line was not appropriate. - You formatted it in such a way that it was difficult to read. - You asked more than one unrelated question in one message. - You sent out a message with an incorrect date, time or time zone. - You sent out the same message more than once. - You sent an 'unsubscribe' message to FreeBSD-questions. If you have done any of these things, there is a good chance that you will get more than one copy of this message from different people. Read on, and your next message will be more successful. This document is also available on the web at http://www.lemis.com/questions.html. ===================================================================== Contents: I: Introduction II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions III: Should I ask -questions, -newbies or -hackers? IV: How to submit a question to FreeBSD-questions V: How to answer a question to FreeBSD-questions I: Introduction =============== This is a regular posting aimed to help both those seeking advice from FreeBSD-questions (the "newcomers"), and also those who answer the questions (the "hackers"). Note that the term "hacker" has nothing to do with breaking into other people's computers. The correct term for the latter activity is "cracker", but the popular press hasn't found out yet. The FreeBSD hackers disapprove strongly of cracking security, and have nothing to do with it. In the past, there has been some friction which stems from the different viewpoints of the two groups. The newcomers accused the hackers of being arrogant, stuck-up, and unhelpful, while the hackers accused the newcomers of being stupid, unable to read plain English, and expecting everything to be handed to them on a silver platter. Of course, there's an element of truth in both these claims, but for the most part these viewpoints come from a sense of frustration. In this document, I'd like to do something to relieve this frustration and help everybody get better results from FreeBSD-questions. In the following section, I recommend how to submit a question; after that, we'll look at how to answer one. II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions ============================================== When you subscribed to FreeBSD-questions, you got a welcome message from freebsd-questions-request@FreeBSD.ORG. In this message, amongst other things, it told you how to unsubscribe. Here's a typical message: Welcome to the freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list! If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your options (eg, switch to or from digest mode, change your password, etc.), visit your subscription page at: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions/me@me.org (obviously, substitute your mail address for "me@me.org"). You can also make such adjustments via email by sending a message to: freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org with the word 'help' in the subject or body (don't include the quotes), and you will get back a message with instructions. You must know your password to change your options (including changing the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. Normally, Mailman will remind you of your freebsd.org mailing list passwords once every month, although you can disable this if you prefer. This reminder will also include instructions on how to unsubscribe or change your account options. There is also a button on your options page that will email your current password to you. Here's the general information for the list you've subscribed to, in case you don't already have it: FREEBSD-QUESTIONS User questions This is the mailing list for questions about FreeBSD. You should not send "how to" questions to the technical lists unless you consider the question to be pretty technical. Normally, unsubscribing is even simpler than the message suggests: you don't need to specify your mail ID unless it is different from the one which you specified when you subscribed. If Majordomo replies and tells you (incorrectly) that you're not on the list, this may mean one of two things: 1. You have changed your mail ID since you subscribed. That's where keeping the original message from majordomo comes in handy. For example, the sample message above shows my mail ID as grog@lemis.de. Since then, I have changed it to grog@lemis.com. If I were to try to remove grog@lemis.com from the list, it would fail: I would have to specify the name with which I joined. 2. You're subscribed to a mailing list which is subscribed to FreeBSD-questions. If that's the case, you'll have to figure out which one it is and get your name taken off that one. If you're not sure which one it might be, check the headers of the messages you receive from freebsd-questions: maybe there's a clue there. If you've done all this, and you still can't figure out what's going on, send a message to Postmaster@FreeBSD.org, and he will sort things out for you. Don't send a message to FreeBSD-questions: they can't help you. III: Should I ask -questions, -newbies or -hackers? =================================================== Two mailing lists handle general questions about FreeBSD, FreeBSD-questions and FreeBSD-hackers. In addition, the FreeBSD-newbies list caters specifically for people who are new to FreeBSD and may be having trouble getting used to the environment. In some cases, it's not really clear which group you should ask. The following criteria should help for 99% of all questions, however: If the question is of a general nature, first check whether this isn't a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ). There's a list of these questions at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/index.html, and also on your own system (once you've installed it) at /usr/share/doc/en/books/faq/index.html. Check there, and if you don't find an answer, ask FreeBSD-questions. Examples might be questions about installing FreeBSD or the use of a particular UNIX utility. If you think the question relates to a bug, but you're not sure, or you don't know how to look for it, send the message to FreeBSD-questions. If the question relates to a bug, and you're almost sure that it's a bug (for example, you can pinpoint the place in the code where it happens, and you maybe have a fix), then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. You should also enter a problem report with the send-pr utility. If the question relates to enhancements to FreeBSD, and you can make suggestions about how to implement them, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. If the question is of particularly technical nature, such as implementation details or suggestions for improvements, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. If you're new to FreeBSD, and the message is about your own relationship to FreeBSD, send the message to FreeBSD-newbies. There are also a number of other specialized mailing lists, for example FreeBSD-isp, which caters to the interests of ISPs (Internet Service Providers) who run FreeBSD. If you happen to be an ISP, this doesn't mean you should automatically send your questions to FreeBSD-isp. The criteria above still apply, and it's in your interest to stick to them, since you're more likely to get good results that way. IV: How to submit a question ============================= When submitting a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider the following points: 1. Remember that nobody gets paid for answering a FreeBSD question. They do it of their own free will. You can influence this free will positively by submitting a well-formulated question supplying as much relevant information as possible. You can influence this free will negatively by submitting an incomplete, illegible, or rude question. It's perfectly possible to send a message to FreeBSD-questions and not get an answer even if you follow these rules. It's much more possible to not get an answer if you don't. In the rest of this document, we'll look at how to get the most out of your question to FreeBSD-questions. 2. Not everybody who answers FreeBSD questions reads every message: they look at the subject line and decide whether it interests them. Clearly, it's in your interest to specify a subject. ``FreeBSD problem'' or ``Help'' aren't enough. If you provide no subject at all, many people won't bother reading it. If your subject isn't specific enough, the people who can answer it may not read it. 3. When sending a new message, well, send a new message. Don't reply to some other message, erase the old content and change the subject line. That leaves an In-reply-to: header which many mail readers use to thread messages, so your message shows up as a reply to some other message. People often delete messages a whole thread at a time, so apart from irritating people, you also run a chance of having the message deleted unread. 4. Format your message so that it is legible, and PLEASE DON'T SHOUT!!!!!. We appreciate that a lot of people don't speak English as their first language, and we try to make allowances for that, but it's really painful to try to read a message written full of typos or without any line breaks. A lot of badly formatted messages come from bad mailers or badly configured mailers. The following mailers are known to send out badly formatted messages without you finding out about them: Eudora exmh Microsoft Exchange Microsoft Internet Mail Microsoft Outlook Netscape As you can see, the mailers in the Microsoft world are frequent offenders. If at all possible, use a UNIX mailer. If you must use a mailer under Microsoft environments, make sure it is set up correctly. Try not to use MIME: a lot of people use mailers which don't get on very well with MIME. For further information on this subject, check out http://www.lemis.com/email.html. 5. Make sure your time and time zone are set correctly. This may seem a little silly, since your message still gets there, but many of the people you are trying to reach get several hundred messages a day. They frequently sort the incoming messages by subject and by date, and if your message doesn't come before the first answer, they may assume they missed it and not bother to look. 6. Don't include unrelated questions in the same message. Firstly, a long message tends to scare people off, and secondly, it's more difficult to get all the people who can answer all the questions to read the message. 7. Specify as much information as possible. This is a difficult area, and we need to expand on what information you need to submit, but here's a start: If you get error messages, don't say ``I get error messages'', say (for example) ``I get the error message 'No route to host'''. If your system panics, don't say ``My system panicked'', say (for example) ``my system panicked with the message 'free vnode isn't'''. If you have difficulty installing FreeBSD, please tell us what hardware you have. In particular, it's important to know the IRQs and I/O addresses of the boards installed in your machine. If you have difficulty getting PPP to run, describe the configuration. Which version of PPP do you use? What kind of authentication do you have? Do you have a static or dynamic IP address? What kind of messages do you get in the log file? 8. If you don't get an answer immediately, or if you don't even see your own message appear on the list immediately, don't resend the message. Wait at least 24 hours. The FreeBSD mailer offloads messages to a number of subordinate mailers around the world, and sometimes it can take several hours for the mail to get through. And once it gets through, the one person who might know the answer will probably just have gone to bed in his part of the world. 9. If you do all this, and you still don't get an answer, there could be other reasons. For example, the problem is so complicated that nobody knows the answer, or the person who does know the answer was offline. If you don't get an answer after, say, a week, it might help to re-send the message. If you don't get an answer to your second message, though, you're probably not going to get one from this forum. Resending the same message again and again will only make you unpopular. To summarize, let's assume you know the answer to the following question (yes, it's the same one in each case :-). You choose which of these two questions you would be more prepared to answer: Message 1: Subject: (none) I just can't get hits damn silly FereBSD system to workd, and Im really good at this tsuff, but I have never seen anythign sho difficult to install, it jst wont work whatever I try so why don't y9ou guys tell me what I doing wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message 2: Subject: Problems installing FreeBSD I've just got the FreeBSD 2.1.5 CD-ROM from Walnut Creek, and I'm having a lot of difficulty installing it. I have a 66 MHz 486 with 16 MB of memory and an Adaptec 1540A SCSI board, a 1.2GB Quantum Fireball disk and a Toshiba 3501XA CD-ROM drive. The installation works just fine, but when I try to reboot the system, I get the message "Missing Operating System". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- V: How to follow up to a question ================================= Often you will want to send in additional information to a question you have already sent. The best way to do this is to reply to your original message. This has three advantages: 1. You include the original message text, so people will know what you're talking about. Don't forget to trim unnecessary text out, though. 2. The text in the subject line stays the same (you did remember to put one in, didn't you?). Many mailers will sort messages by subject. This helps group messages together. 3. The message reference numbers in the header will refer to the previous message. Some mailers, such as mutt, can thread messages, showing the exact relationships between the messages. VI: How to answer a question ============================ Before you answer a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider: 1. A lot of the points on submitting questions also apply to answering questions. Read them. 2. Has somebody already answered the question? The easiest way to check this is to sort your incoming mail by subject: then (hopefully) you'll see the question followed by any answers, all together. If somebody has already answered it, it doesn't automatically mean that you shouldn't send another answer. But it makes sense to read all the other answers first. 3. Do you have something to contribute beyond what has already been said? In general, "Yeah, me too" answers don't help much, although there are exceptions, like when somebody is describing a problem he's having, and he doesn't know whether it's his fault or whether there's something wrong with the hardware or software. If you do send a "me too" answer, you should also include any further relevant information. 4. Are you sure you understand the question? Very frequently, the person who asks the question is confused or doesn't express himself very well. Even with the best understanding of the system, it's easy to send a reply which doesn't answer the question. This doesn't help: you'll leave the person who submitted the question more frustrated or confused than ever. If nobody else answers, and you're not too sure either, you can always ask for more information. 5. Are you sure your answer is correct? If not, wait a day or so. If nobody else comes up with a better answer, you can still reply and say, for example, "I don't know if this is correct, but since nobody else has replied, why don't you try replacing your ATAPI CD-ROM with a frog?". 6. Unless there's a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and to FreeBSD-questions. Many people on the FreeBSD-questions are "lurkers": they learn by reading messages sent and replied to by others. If you take a message which is of general interest off the list, you're depriving these people of their information. Be careful with group replies; lots of people send messages with hundreds of CCs. If this is the case, be sure to trim the Cc: lines appropriately. 7. Include relevant text from the original message. Trim it to the minimum, but don't overdo it. It should still be possible for somebody who didn't read the original message to understand what you're talking about. 8. Use some technique to identify which text came from the original message, and which text you add. I personally find that prepending ``> '' to the original message works best. Leaving white space after the ``> '' and leave empty lines between your text and the original text both make the result more readable. 9. Put your response in the correct place (after the text to which it replies). It's very difficult to read a thread of responses where each reply comes before the text to which it replies. 10. Most mailers change the subject line on a reply by prepending a text such as ``Re: ''. If your mailer doesn't do it automatically, you should do it manually. 11. If the submitter didn't abide by format conventions (lines too long, inappropriate subject line), please fix it. In the case of an incorrect subject line (such as ``HELP!!??''), change the subject line to (say) ``Re: Difficulties with sync PPP (was: HELP!!??)''. That way other people trying to follow the thread will have less difficulty following it. In such cases, it's appropriate to say what you did and why you did it, but try not to be rude. If you find you can't answer without being rude, don't answer. If you just want to reply to a message because of its bad format, just reply to the submitter, not to the list. You can just send him this message in reply, if you like. $Id: Howto-ask-questions,v 1.5 2004/09/19 02:40:48 grog Exp $ _______________________________________________ Thanks to Josh Paetzel for updating this document to describe mailman. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 17:02:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id D4EBB16A421; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:02:00 +0000 (GMT) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20050729170200.D4EBB16A421@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:02:00 +0000 (GMT) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:02:01 -0000 The trouble with books is that you can't update them the way you can a web page or any other online documentation. The result is that most leading edge computer books are out of date almost before they are printed. Unfortunately, The Complete FreeBSD, published by O'Reilly, is no exception. Inevitably, a number of bugs and changes have surfaced. "The Complete FreeBSD" has been through a total of five editions, including its predecessor "Installing and Running FreeBSD". Two of these have been reprinted with corrections. I maintain a series of errata pages. Start at http://www.lemis.com/errata-4.html to find out how to get the errata information. Have you found a problem with the book, or maybe something confusing? Please let me know: I'm constantly updating it. Greg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 18:19:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9EB16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:19:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from halljer@auburn.edu) Received: from groupwise1.duc.auburn.edu (groupwise1.duc.auburn.edu [131.204.2.92]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A01943D48 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:19:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from halljer@auburn.edu) Received: from Auburn-MTA by groupwise1.duc.auburn.edu with Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:19:54 -0500 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.5.2 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:19:43 -0500 From: "Dusty Hall" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Sparc64 - Intel PRO/1000MT (82545EM) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:19:54 -0000 Are there any plans for adding support for the Intel PRO/1000MT (82545EM) NIC on the Sparc64 platforms? OpenBSD Sparc64 supports it... Thanks, -Dusty From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 19:18:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3AD716A420 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:18:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@math.ku.dk) Received: from imf.math.ku.dk (fw.math.ku.dk [130.225.103.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5335743D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:18:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@math.ku.dk) Received: from imf.math.ku.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imf.math.ku.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3821E496 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:18:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from shannon.math.ku.dk (shannon.math.ku.dk [130.225.103.12]) by imf.math.ku.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:18:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:18:07 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=C3=B8rgaard?= To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Subject: scanimage -L doesn't work as normal user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:18:14 -0000 Hi, I just bought an Epson 2480 scanner. I'm currently at trying to make things work for ordinary users, sane-find-scanner works for normal users, but scanimage doesn't. Following the instruction I run as root: # sane-find-scanner -q found USB scanner (vendor=0x04b8 [EPSON], product=0x0121 [EPSON Scanner]) at libusb:/dev/usb0:/dev/ugen0 # scanimage -L device `snapscan:libusb:/dev/usb0:/dev/ugen0' is a EPSON EPSON Scanner flatbed scanner And I have even succesfully scanned the warranty in pnm. Then as ordinary user: $ sane-find-scanner -q found USB scanner (vendor=0x04b8 [EPSON], product=0x0121 [EPSON Scanner]) at libusb:/dev/usb0:/dev/ugen0 $ scanimage -L No scanners were identified. If you were expecting something different, check that the scanner is plugged in, turned on and detected by the sane-find-scanner tool (if appropriate). Please read the documentation which came with this software (README, FAQ, manpages). I have tried to indicate the device for scanimage but with no result: $ scanimage -d libusb:/dev/usb0:/dev/ugen0 scanimage: open of device libusb:/dev/usb0:/dev/ugen0 failed: Invalid argument Then I have tried to remove one of the devices and to change libusb with snapscan which is supposedly the backend driver. Any clues? Thanks, Erik GnuPG: http://www.locolomo.org/home/norgaard/norgaard.gpg.asc pub 1024D/11D11F9E 2003-08-15 Erik Norgaard Key fingerprint = C394 81C4 D137 EEE5 39BE 82D5 3E6B FB3E 11D1 1F9E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 19:40:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B72216A464 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:40:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikko@whitecortex.net) Received: from whitecortex.net (whitecortex.net [62.142.244.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6BEE43D4C for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:40:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikko@whitecortex.net) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whitecortex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF851F07FE for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:40:43 +0300 (EEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: questions@freebsd.org From: Mikko Heiskanen Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:40:42 +0300 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) Cc: Subject: dualboot winxp & freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:40:48 -0000 Hi, it seems it's so common knowledge to achieve this, that there isn't any info anywhere about it. So, I have a winxp hard disk at the end of a sata pci-card, and freebsd harddisk straight in the motherboard ide connection. So if both are connected, freebsd starts, and if I take cabled off the freebsd harddisk, windows starts. I cannot choose it from the bios that windows would make it first. So that rules out the solution from handbook, where it's done vice versa. Secondly, I wouldn't want any gag or grub or any other "external" programs; I'm quite sure freebsd's own bootloader can do it without problems. Question remains: how? I vaguely remember I had done it before. Thank you for your time, Mikko (using freebsd 5.4) PS: I'm not subscribed at the moment, I would appreciate if you could post a copy for me. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 19:43:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B5016A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:43:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pcgeek86@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E51C43D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:43:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pcgeek86@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so567765nzo for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:43:54 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=RJFHK8FGfEK+HCN+LpWPpHvnOMNvPi9qI/nKoHnBcEm7mCynDNE9bND3H4RDuYGX/WZP5uHRAXRetJmPrS3D4slTaQ7WlcmnacoQ8nJ9NVBrhX6XoPCSdQwxORfa3PzvWbmy/3WDMxqlVeaSg2QTrSpfCnaaYUCh4xrEoTwCKYw= Received: by 10.36.7.20 with SMTP id 20mr3415207nzg; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:43:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.100.100.15? ([66.92.128.235]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 38sm1768894nzk.2005.07.29.12.43.54; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:43:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42EA8997.1030700@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:55:03 -0500 From: Trevor Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dick Hoogendijk References: <20050729002602.65ff60bb.dick@nagual.st> <42E96BBB.1000809@gmail.com> <20050729134726.GA68096@lothlorien.nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <20050729134726.GA68096@lothlorien.nagual.st> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: need some advice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:43:55 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > On 28 Jul Trevor Sullivan wrote: > >> I would recommend purchasing an Athlon 64 3000+ Venice core. I >> just picked one of these up along with 2 gigs of ram and a 6600GT >> and it runs sooooooo nice. Not only that, but it's cheap. > > > I tend to switch to this 3000+ Venice core thing. Problem is > finding a motherboard that ALSO is fully supported by FreeBSD. It > seems lots of those 939 boards are not ;-( > > If you are running fbsd, which motherboard did you choose? > > Finding the rest is no problem ;-) > Well, I bought the ECS KN1 Extreme (awesome board). I didn't really check compatibility with FreeBSD because I run Windows XP on my client machines. The reasons I went with this board are that it is well featured, it was relatively cheap compared to other socket 939 boards, and I also learned that ECS manufactures boards for other companies that rebrand them. You can never be sure what you're actually buying, so I went with the real manufacturer if that makes any sense. Sorry I couldn't be of more help. Figured I'd at least evangelize the Venice core (good choice...it runs fast and cool! :-) Trevor -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQFC6omWoGycRpOgdeERA++yAKCNi/FwpBqbwVX4K/oRFFCE5ftsogCgt6ls dcfvX2f01ytCFpJLSX2vcHk= =2Bge -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 19:49:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B34D16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:49:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from jupiter.efacilitas.de (85-10-196-108.clients.your-server.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0760E43D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:49:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-37-29.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.37.29]) by jupiter.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B350C3ECE7; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:55:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF97E12B1C5; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:49:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29721-01; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:49:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79C412B02A; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:49:04 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42EA8830.8050305@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:49:04 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050517 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mikko Heiskanen References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dualboot winxp & freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:49:39 -0000 Mikko Heiskanen wrote: > it seems it's so common knowledge to achieve this, > that there isn't any info anywhere about it. > So, I have a winxp hard disk at the end of a sata pci-card, > and freebsd harddisk straight in the motherboard ide connection. > > So if both are connected, freebsd starts, > and if I take cabled off the freebsd harddisk, windows starts. > I cannot choose it from the bios that windows would make it first. I think you can choose 'SCSI' in your BIOS. Although it is not a SCSI controller it should work. > Secondly, I wouldn't want any gag or grub or any other "external" programs; > I'm quite sure freebsd's own bootloader can do it without problems. > > Question remains: how? I vaguely remember I had done it before. # sysctl kern.geom.debugflags=16 // make the MBR writable temporarily # boot0cfg -B // install the boot0 boot loader See also the manpage boot0cfg(8). Regards Björn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 20:01:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0132816A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:01:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from BlackBsd@Mountain.net) Received: from unixhost1.1st.net (unixhost1.1st.net [209.240.21.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 71BF643D48 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:01:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from BlackBsd@Mountain.net) Received: (qmail 19269 invoked by uid 578); 29 Jul 2005 20:01:08 -0000 Received: from BlackBsd@Mountain.net by unixhost1.1st.net by uid 502 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.65. Clear:RC:1(69.67.129.20):. Processed in 0.027209 secs); 29 Jul 2005 20:01:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.194?) (proactiv-blackb%proactivetechllc.com@69.67.129.20) by proactivetechllc.com with SMTP; 29 Jul 2005 20:01:08 -0000 Message-ID: <42EA8B01.3050509@Mountain.net> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:01:05 -0400 From: Brian Black User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050523 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Is Kern/Pr 58045 really fixed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: BlackBsd@Mountain.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:01:13 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hi, I am using 5.4 release and the pr link http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=58045 is giving me problems. Has the patch been merged into the main tree? If so maybe this bug is not fixed. Is this problem in the 6.0-beta1 .iso? is their any other information i may be able to provide to help with the issue? thanx brian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC6osBI9Y/1VIS+jgRAvhvAKCnei1/yPX44Ir2Ifk/MAJIXg5HAACcCV6D aLxM/m8kI6J7+otuXVbVjh0= =NVAg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 20:22:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83E316A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:22:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from BlackBsd@Mountain.net) Received: from unixhost1.1st.net (unixhost1.1st.net [209.240.21.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2833C43D48 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:22:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from BlackBsd@Mountain.net) Received: (qmail 22023 invoked by uid 578); 29 Jul 2005 20:22:12 -0000 Received: from BlackBsd@Mountain.net by unixhost1.1st.net by uid 502 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.65. Clear:RC:1(69.67.129.20):. Processed in 0.027012 secs); 29 Jul 2005 20:22:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.194?) (proactiv-blackb%proactivetechllc.com@69.67.129.20) by proactivetechllc.com with SMTP; 29 Jul 2005 20:22:11 -0000 Message-ID: <42EA8FE6.207@Mountain.net> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:21:58 -0400 From: Brian Black User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050523 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glenn Dawson References: <42EA8B01.3050509@Mountain.net> <6.1.0.6.2.20050729130708.01be7d90@cobalt.antimatter.net> In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20050729130708.01be7d90@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is Kern/Pr 58045 really fixed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: BlackBsd@Mountain.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:22:16 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Glenn Dawson wrote: > At 01:01 PM 7/29/2005, you wrote: > > hi, > > I am using 5.4 release and the pr link > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=58045 is giving me problems. > Has the patch been merged into the main tree? If so maybe this bug is > not fixed. Is this problem in the 6.0-beta1 .iso? is their any other > information i may be able to provide to help with the issue? > > >> it's listed as closed as of Wed Dec 17 21:57:46 PST 2003 > >> -Glenn thanx for the reply Glenn, if the bug has been closed for like 2 years now, maybe it might need to be reopened. In addition, the usb/PR 65436 is still listed as being open. Both pr's seem to be related, but im not sure. thanx brian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC6o/mI9Y/1VIS+jgRAva8AKCtSJI/VwMsdWnpOTkAobr9EL645wCfbLcY y+V2tuZhlVGeHiVjunmqgfs= =TZ3u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 20:25:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F4F316A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:25:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D18743D4C for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:25:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fields.fields.utoronto.ca (fields.localdomain [192.168.216.11]) by fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields 6.0) with ESMTP id j6TKPHNV006734 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:25:17 -0400 Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (fields.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.11]) by fields.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields WS 6.0) with ESMTP id j6TKPG6P003822; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:25:16 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E94F4514C4; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:25:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:25:09 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Brian Black Message-ID: <20050729202509.GA34247@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <42EA8B01.3050509@Mountain.net> <6.1.0.6.2.20050729130708.01be7d90@cobalt.antimatter.net> <42EA8FE6.207@Mountain.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42EA8FE6.207@Mountain.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Glenn Dawson Subject: Re: Is Kern/Pr 58045 really fixed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:25:21 -0000 --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 04:21:58PM -0400, Brian Black wrote: > Glenn Dawson wrote: > > At 01:01 PM 7/29/2005, you wrote: > >=20 > > hi, > >=20 > > I am using 5.4 release and the pr link > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D58045 is giving me problem= s. > > Has the patch been merged into the main tree? If so maybe this bug is > > not fixed. Is this problem in the 6.0-beta1 .iso? is their any other > > information i may be able to provide to help with the issue? > >=20 > >=20 > >> it's listed as closed as of Wed Dec 17 21:57:46 PST 2003 > >=20 > >> -Glenn >=20 > thanx for the reply Glenn, if the bug has been closed for like 2 years > now, maybe it might need to be reopened. In addition, the usb/PR 65436 > is still listed as being open. Both pr's seem to be related, but im not > sure. If you think the problem still exists, please provide supporting evidence. Thanks, Kris --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC6pClWry0BWjoQKURApKyAKCJ1/bnUtOX14+eWt2kIEhErgHF4ACdHPf/ kG0MdwO3WpgoXjY1ONZDcc8= =4X7f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 20:28:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 635E816A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:28:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cholland@redmoonbroadband.com) Received: from exchange.redmoonbroadband.com (exchange.redmoonbroadband.com [206.123.80.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B89343D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:28:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cholland@redmoonbroadband.com) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:27:37 -0500 Message-ID: <4B3EE484EEA4F344BBB62F831648998637C986@corpsrv.RedMoon.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: BSD Updates Thread-Index: AcWUe9skKsAUk3VeQNaOLYui0fZM6A== From: "Cody Holland" To: Subject: BSD Updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:28:55 -0000 I just signed up and started using http://bsdupdates.com on a development server to see how it worked. Haven't had any issues yet, but wanted to know if anyone else out there is using it and your opinions. Thanks, Cody From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 20:53:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1FB016A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:53:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sarath@linuxtechs.net) Received: from venus.mediacatch.com (venus.mediacatch.com [216.27.201.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877E043D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:53:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sarath@linuxtechs.net) Received: from [203.109.75.70] (helo=[203.109.75.70]) by venus.mediacatch.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.50) id 1Dybrm-0000EI-LM for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:54:05 -0400 Message-ID: <42EA974F.8070506@linuxtechs.net> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 02:23:35 +0530 From: Sarath User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - venus.mediacatch.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - linuxtechs.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Happy Sysadmin Day! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:53:56 -0000 Today is System Administrator Appreciation Day! Friday, July 29th, 2005 6th Annual Visit www.sysadminday.com Cheers to all. - Sarath From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 21:56:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A12FF16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:56:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB33543D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:56:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id j6TLvub15627; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:57:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , "Glenn Dawson" Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:56:24 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <42EA8FE6.207@Mountain.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Is Kern/Pr 58045 really fixed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:56:41 -0000 One reason bugs get closed is that the submitters don't respond to requests from the developers for further info. A status of closed should not be interpreted to mean any bug was corrected. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Brian Black >Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 1:22 PM >To: Glenn Dawson >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Is Kern/Pr 58045 really fixed? > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >Glenn Dawson wrote: >> At 01:01 PM 7/29/2005, you wrote: >> >> hi, >> >> I am using 5.4 release and the pr link >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=58045 is giving me >problems. >> Has the patch been merged into the main tree? If so maybe >this bug is >> not fixed. Is this problem in the 6.0-beta1 .iso? is their any other >> information i may be able to provide to help with the issue? >> >> >>> it's listed as closed as of Wed Dec 17 21:57:46 PST 2003 >> >>> -Glenn > >thanx for the reply Glenn, if the bug has been closed for like 2 years >now, maybe it might need to be reopened. In addition, the usb/PR 65436 >is still listed as being open. Both pr's seem to be related, but im not >sure. > >thanx >brian > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) >Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > >iD8DBQFC6o/mI9Y/1VIS+jgRAva8AKCtSJI/VwMsdWnpOTkAobr9EL645wCfbLcY >y+V2tuZhlVGeHiVjunmqgfs= >=TZ3u >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 22:02:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBB116A42A for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:02:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hal@cc.usu.edu) Received: from cudaout.usu.edu (cudaout.usu.edu [129.123.1.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23FE43D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:02:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hal@cc.usu.edu) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1122674525-1802-113-0 X-Barracuda-URL: http://129.123.1.27:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from [129.123.104.140] (buffy.ncs.usu.edu [129.123.104.140]) by cudaout.usu.edu (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 61BD8D015352 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:02:05 -0600 (MDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <46F46F5A-5AFD-49FB-A19E-7FEFDE74C278@cc.usu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: hal X-ASG-Orig-Subj: rshd vs 5.4 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:02:04 -0600 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) X-Virus-Scanned: by BarraCUDA Spam Firewall at usu.edu X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -1.10 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-1.10 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=BAYES_40 X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.02, rules version 3.0.2833 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.10 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40% [score: 0.2097] Cc: Subject: rshd vs 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:02:06 -0000 Trying to connect to my new backup server running 5.4 using rsh fails. It worked well on my old backup server running 4.7 P25. inetd.conf has the /usr/libexec/rshd line un-commented. hosts.allow permits the remote host to connect to rshd. The rsh file in /etc/pam.d has been patched by hand and looks good. The message I am getting after some timeout period is: server.host.name: Connection refused It appears that inetd, which is running by the way, is not starting rshd. Can anyone give me a pointer or two to get this thing working? hal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 22:05:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C6816A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:05:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29BC43D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:05:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Message-ID: <42EAA828.1060100@intersonic.se> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:05:28 +0200 From: Per olof Ljungmark User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050502) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at inter-sonic.com Subject: sunbird X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:05:37 -0000 Anyone successfully built Sunbird on FreeBSD4 or 5? I thought I'd start off trying but was sort of baffled by all the ./configure options... Thanks, Per olof From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 22:10:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB4B16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:10:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu (server.t-hosting.hu [217.20.133.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA6943D62 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:10:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDCF997746; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:10:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.t-hosting.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18039-01-13; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:10:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [80.98.156.20] (catv-50629c14.catv.broadband.hu [80.98.156.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACEA299741D; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:10:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42EAA95F.3060503@t-hosting.hu> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:10:39 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hal References: <46F46F5A-5AFD-49FB-A19E-7FEFDE74C278@cc.usu.edu> In-Reply-To: <46F46F5A-5AFD-49FB-A19E-7FEFDE74C278@cc.usu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rshd vs 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:10:46 -0000 hal wrote: > Trying to connect to my new backup server running 5.4 using rsh fails. > > It worked well on my old backup server running 4.7 P25. > > inetd.conf has the /usr/libexec/rshd line un-commented. > > hosts.allow permits the remote host to connect to rshd. > > The rsh file in /etc/pam.d has been patched by hand and looks good. > > The message I am getting after some timeout period is: > > server.host.name: Connection refused > > It appears that inetd, which is running by the way, is not starting > rshd. > > Can anyone give me a pointer or two to get this thing working? > > hal Unfortunately, I don't know the solution for your problem, but I'm really intersted what's the point in using rshd? SSH is more common and it is secure. Security is not necessary in a trusted subnet, but sshd would suffice your needs. And FreeBSD is shipped with a working sshd configurations, what You have to do is only enabling it in rc.conf. Cheers, Gábor Kövesdán From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 23:24:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B860F16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:24:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EBF443D66 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:24:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from epia2.farid-hajji.net (epia-2 [192.168.254.11]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EBE84AC81; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:23:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:25:11 +0200 From: cpghost To: Erik N??rgaard Message-ID: <20050729232511.GA3040@epia2.farid-hajji.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: scanimage -L doesn't work as normal user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:24:23 -0000 On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 09:18:07PM +0200, Erik N??rgaard wrote: > Following the instruction I run as root: > # sane-find-scanner -q > found USB scanner (vendor=0x04b8 [EPSON], product=0x0121 [EPSON > Scanner]) at libusb:/dev/usb0:/dev/ugen0 > # scanimage -L > device `snapscan:libusb:/dev/usb0:/dev/ugen0' is a EPSON EPSON > Scanner flatbed scanner > > And I have even succesfully scanned the warranty in pnm. > > Then as ordinary user: > $ sane-find-scanner -q > found USB scanner (vendor=0x04b8 [EPSON], product=0x0121 [EPSON > Scanner]) at libusb:/dev/usb0:/dev/ugen0 > $ scanimage -L > > No scanners were identified. If you were expecting something > different, check that the scanner is plugged in, turned on and > detected by the sane-find-scanner tool (if appropriate). Please > read the documentation which came with this software (README, FAQ, > manpages). This is normally a problem with permissions. You could set them to 0666 in /etc/devfs.conf, and [re]start devfs with # /etc/rc.d/devfs start Then try using scanimage again as ordinary user. > $ scanimage -d libusb:/dev/usb0:/dev/ugen0 > scanimage: open of device libusb:/dev/usb0:/dev/ugen0 failed: > Invalid argument Cheers, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 23:29:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BFA16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:29:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDA043D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:29:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F876118; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:29:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12700-05; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:29:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [216.201.118.138] (racerx.makeworld.com [216.201.118.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FBA76117; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:29:48 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <42EABBF5.5010806@makeworld.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:29:57 -0500 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (X11/20050715) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cody Holland References: <4B3EE484EEA4F344BBB62F831648998637C986@corpsrv.RedMoon.local> In-Reply-To: <4B3EE484EEA4F344BBB62F831648998637C986@corpsrv.RedMoon.local> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 OpenPGP: id=C01BC363 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.2 (20050629) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSD Updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:29:54 -0000 Cody Holland wrote: > I just signed up and started using http://bsdupdates.com on a > development server to see how it worked. Haven't had any issues yet, > but wanted to know if anyone else out there is using it and your > opinions. > > > Thanks, > Cody Well - you don't need a 3rd party to keep informed as to the FreeBSD SA's. Subscribe to the list and get them when they come out. In fact, FreeBSD 5.4 is now on p6 - not p2 as that site states. -- Best regards, Chris You never know who's right, but you always know who's in charge. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 00:00:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9B8316A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:00:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jtarwid@wi.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-01.rdc-kc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01.rdc-kc.rr.com [24.94.166.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E95043D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:00:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jtarwid@wi.rr.com) Received: from monster (CPE-65-30-128-188.wi.res.rr.com [65.30.128.188]) by ms-smtp-01.rdc-kc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id j6U00OZ7011637 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:00:24 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <000601c59499$b7589470$6600a8c0@monster> From: "Jerry Tarwid" To: Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:00:36 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: How do I get rid of booteasy??? & re-install windows xp mbr using ntfs??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:00:28 -0000 I am dual booting with Winblows XP and FreeBSD. I installed the FreeBSD = Boot manager so I can dual boot. I now want to remove it! I have = freaking scoured the $@!#$! net & still have NOT found an answer??? = Anyone???? I'm using an NTFS volume so fdisk/mbr doesn't work and = neither does booting to an xp cd recovery console and using fixboot or = fixmbr. The $#!@#$ booteasy boot manager still leaves something in the = mbr....nothing works! I cannot believe that I am the only human being on = the planet that has encountered this problem! A LITTLE HELP??? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 01:48:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3DA16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:48:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asolomon15@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867B443D46 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:48:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asolomon15@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so1008133rne for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:48:32 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=qMsyR97cRJXuQkD6ivfbqicGVmlFc2i6TLOT7iEGkJWVGH2rjQj57WFGYvlnQV6MUmYovRwr/a4fGmX49vI/WgyRMy0+Q4mx0Sxgs0BNt9br5Vmnm/fkoIQO+asIblIwCKJAnEQb8hMbPvY4nvG36wtERsut3k1gsMlQsKUDRtc= Received: by 10.38.92.36 with SMTP id p36mr331982rnb; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:48:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.97.75 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:48:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:48:32 -0400 From: Antoine Solomon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: onboard ethernet support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Antoine Solomon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:48:34 -0000 Hello all,=20 has anyone tried to get a marvell Yukon 88E8053 pci-e gigabit ethernet card working on fbsd 5.4? Is there any support for this? --=20 Antoine W. Solomon Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 04:01:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33F616A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 04:01:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maksim.yevmenkin@savvis.net) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665E143D46 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 04:01:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maksim.yevmenkin@savvis.net) Received: from [192.168.1.254] (really [70.32.199.60]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with ESMTP id <20050730040120.QIUF19267.mta10.adelphia.net@[192.168.1.254]>; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:01:20 -0400 Message-ID: <42EAFB9A.4080309@savvis.net> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:01:30 -0700 From: Maksim Yevmenkin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bsderss References: <20050730032019.5480.qmail@web54406.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050730032019.5480.qmail@web54406.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why tun/tap but instead ordinary ethernet device (eg. fxp) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 04:01:22 -0000 Hello, first, please _do_not_ cross post. second, please use appropriate mailing list. i have redirected this thread to freebsd-questions@ >>this type of question comes up quite often. its >>really simple: a single >>read(2) call on /dev/tapX will return entire >>ethernet frame (if any) >>received by tap interface (minus ethernet crc). a >>single write(2) call >>on /dev/tapX will put entire ethernet frame (w/out >>ethernet crc) onto >>tap interface outgoing queue. >> >>so, the "buf" parameter to the write(2) call on >>/dev/tapX device should >>point to a buffer with *complete* ethernet frame, >>including ethernet >>header and payload. payload could be IP packet, but >>it does not have to >>be. any protocol that uses ethernet as transport can >>be tunneled with >>tap(4) (i.e. ipx). >> >>the above is true for tun(4) with exception that >>tun(4) operates on IP >>packets. so you have to write/read complete IP >>packets to/from /dev/tun. > > Thanks for the detail explaination. As "man tap" > pointed out, one can use tap drive as if using a pty > device. I m not aware the obvious advantage of using > tap over ordinarlly ethernet device for tunnelling > programming (another example is ipsec). It may be > because programming on tun/tap is alot of efficient > and simpler. Can anyone pleaese explain? tun(4)/tap(4) _do_not_ use pty(4) device. they provide functionality similar to pty(4). you seem to be confused about about the concept, or i'm not understanding your question. the main purpose of the tun(4)/tap(4) is to provide _virtual_ network interface, either ip only (tun) or ethernet (tap). the key word here is /virtual/. both tun and tap are dual in their nature. on one side network interface, on the other - character device. from the network subsystem point of view the system has network interface (either ip or ethernet), so you can assign ip address, netmask, routing etc. just like with any other interface. when the network subsystem sends packet out on the interface instead of physically transmit packet over the wire tun/tap interface loopbacks it back to the user space via character device. what you do with this packet is up to you. openvpn and vtun encrypt the packet/shape it/etc. and send it over another (physical) interface to the remote host. you actually send the tun/tap packet as payload within another packet. the remote system does the reverse. it extracts payload (tun/tap packet), decrypts it, etc. and then writes it back into the character device. this will put the packet on the tun/tap interface and the network subsystem will think that is has received packet from the tun/tap interface. another example is ppp daemon. ppp is a serial protocol, that is ip packets are payload within ppp frames transmitted over the serial link. what ppp daemon does is: it receives ppp frame over the serial link, extract ip packet and writes it to the tun character device. the system thinks that is has just received ip packet from the tun interface. when the system sends ip packet out on the tun interface ppp daemon gets the same packet from the character device, puts it into ppp frame and sends it over the serial link. thus the system acts as if it was connected to the ip network with the real interface, but in fact you do not even have to have a network card (i.e. no real network interface). > With vtun or openvpn, why they don't just simply use > ordinary ethernet device driver but prefer tun or tap > for tunneling or bridging network remote connection? > Is it because applicaiton use tap or tun can send > interrupt (with ioctl) to the remote client more > efficiently? if so, can anyone please tell me what > kind of efficiency does tun/tap over an ordianry > ethernet device in terms of network programming? tun/tap both have overhead, because you have to pass network packets back and force between kernel and userspace. that is the downside. the upside is simplicity and flexibility. thanks, max From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 05:24:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E1C16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 05:24:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from larsen.nick@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7C543D46 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 05:24:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from larsen.nick@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z6so500471nzd for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:24:07 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HNoSUkfiFRK/9EBE2Jr5M0ULCJY4hSPXi68Fkpaku0/G2WieGGt+4ee/kY4TiLBSk/Z4VfxX3DleZK6Y0eS0KR9gJNSADaRFcsW52oMO8nphSK+iXr20UbewLzCFGUg+hMP92O1zb+/5qsLhy18+O9m06fWJkeaTwO/ybb8PwcQ= Received: by 10.37.22.3 with SMTP id z3mr3354029nzi; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:24:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.103.9 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:24:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:24:04 +1200 From: Nick Larsen To: Damian Gerow In-Reply-To: <20050725003238.GD2461@afflictions.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050725003238.GD2461@afflictions.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shell scripts, SSH sessions, and for loops, oh my! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nick Larsen List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 05:24:08 -0000 Hi, You need to escape the metacharacters, so $ will be \$. Double quotes expand variables, single quotes do not, sou cou could just put it all in single quotes. The local system will see the $ as a literal, but the remote system will see it as a variable. Hope this helps some. Nick Larsen ( http://datanet.co.nz/ ) On 7/25/05, Damian Gerow wrote: > (I don't really know /where/ to ask this question. It's not particularly > FreeBSD-centric, but the list has been good to me in the past, so hopeful= ly > nobody minds.) >=20 > I'm trying to write a shell script that runs a for loop in an SSH session= . > Simply, I'm trying to do this: >=20 > for HOST in `cat hostnames` ; do > ssh ${HOST} "for PROCESS in 01 02 ; do echo '${PROCESS}' ; done" > done >=20 > But because this is run in a script, that gets translated to: >=20 > for HOST in `cat hostnames` ; do > ssh ${HOST} "for PROCESS in 01 02 ; do echo '' ; done" > done >=20 > Which most definitely is not what I want. >=20 > I know a few ways around this -- expand the for loop, have a secondary > script, create a secondary script on-the-fly, etc. -- but I'm curious to = see > if I can convince sh to *not* interpret ${PROCESS}. I've tried escaping = it, > I've tried a double-dollar, and I've tried escaping the double-dollar: no= ne > have worked. >=20 > Does anyone have any ideas? >=20 > - Damian >=20 > P.S. Please reply privately as well to the list; thanks. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 05:25:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86CCC16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 05:25:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cws@miraclenet.co.th) Received: from www.hotel-accommodation.net (www.hotel-accommodation.net [203.146.102.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED98943D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 05:25:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cws@miraclenet.co.th) Received: from secure.abatravel.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.hotel-accommodation.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5871DA2C for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:25:41 +0700 (ICT) Received: from 58.136.66.157 (SquirrelMail authenticated user cws) by secure.abatravel.net with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:25:41 +0700 (ICT) Message-ID: <52771.58.136.66.157.1122701141.squirrel@secure.abatravel.net> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:25:41 +0700 (ICT) From: "Chatchawan Wongsiriprasert" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Acess 127.0.0.1 from FreeBSD jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 05:25:43 -0000 Hi, I am now using chroot apache+php, and want to move to more secure FreeBSD jail. After read the FreeBSD handbook, I have been successfully created a jailed apache+php on my test server but there is a litle problem that need to be solved before I put it on my real server. I run mysql-server on this server and make it listen only to 127.0.0.1 (--bind-address option). How can I access mysql-server on this server from the jail without (1) make mysql-server listen to the real ip (I don't want to open another door to my server -- firewall can be employ but this add another complexity to my setup) or (2) using unix socket (a lot of code to change and test -- most are develop by another people). Regards, Chatchawan Wongsiriprasert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 05:35:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024FB16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 05:35:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (hobbiton.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C88B43D46 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 05:35:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.161.222.227] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1Dyk01-0004Tr-5Y; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:35:05 -0600 In-Reply-To: <52771.58.136.66.157.1122701141.squirrel@secure.abatravel.net> References: <52771.58.136.66.157.1122701141.squirrel@secure.abatravel.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <9D57A8CD-C930-4881-84BF-E98089761FAE@shire.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:35:04 -0600 To: Chatchawan Wongsiriprasert X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.161.222.227 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Acess 127.0.0.1 from FreeBSD jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 05:35:07 -0000 On Jul 29, 2005, at 11:25 PM, Chatchawan Wongsiriprasert wrote: > Hi, > I am now using chroot apache+php, and want to move to more secure > FreeBSD jail. > > After read the FreeBSD handbook, I have been successfully created a > jailed apache+php on my test server but there is a litle problem that > need to be solved before I put it on my real server. > > I run mysql-server on this server and make it listen only to > 127.0.0.1 > (--bind-address option). How can I access mysql-server on this server > from the jail without > (1) make mysql-server listen to the real ip (I don't want to open > another door to my server -- firewall can be employ but this add > another complexity to my setup) Create a separate jail on the system and put mysql in that. Make the address of this mysql jail be 192.168.1.1 or something like that. The apache jail will be able to reach it but the outside won't. You should still have a firewall of some sort. > or > (2) using unix socket (a lot of code to change and test -- most > are > develop by another people). Using the socket option is better as it probably also performs better (I don't know this for sure -- am just guessing) Chad > > > Regards, > Chatchawan Wongsiriprasert > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad@shire.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 05:50:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4709416A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 05:50:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cdelsey@qwest.net) Received: from mpls-qmqp-01.inet.qwest.net (mpls-qmqp-01.inet.qwest.net [63.231.195.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD09743D46 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 05:50:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cdelsey@qwest.net) Received: (qmail 17427 invoked by uid 0); 30 Jul 2005 05:50:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (63.231.195.11) by mpls-qmqp-01.inet.qwest.net with QMQP; 30 Jul 2005 05:50:13 -0000 Received: from vdsl-130-13-181-49.phnx.qwest.net (HELO ?192.168.2.2?) (130.13.181.49) by mpls-pop-11.inet.qwest.net with SMTP; 30 Jul 2005 05:50:12 -0000 Received: by localhost.local (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 14C234561; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:50:14 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:50:13 -0700 Message-ID: <20050730055013.GA57362@localhost.local> From: "Carl Delsey" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Growisofs seg faults with DVD-RAM. Anybody else seen this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 05:50:14 -0000 I was trying to use growisofs to write to a DVD-RAM and it kept seg faulting. It worked fine with a DVD-R. I tracked the problem down to place in the code where growisofs tries to perform an operation on a file handle it has already closed. I've implemented a workaround already. The problem is, that by my reckoning, this should affect anybody who is trying to use a DVD-RAM (not DVD+RW) with FreeBSD, but I haven't found any references to the problem on the net. I'm wondering if anybody else has seen this problem, and if you've found some other workaround for it? Or alternatively, you still have the problem and my patch would be useful to you. :-) By the way, I'm running Freebsd 5.4 Release and I'm using dvd+rw-tools 5.21.4.10.8 with an ATAPI DVD burner configured to be /dev/cd1. Thanks, Carl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 06:24:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71B516A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 06:24:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531DE43D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 06:24:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id BD88B84E2B; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:54:25 +0930 (CST) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:54:25 +0930 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050730062425.GK75379@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20050730055013.GA57362@localhost.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="enGqbSaueFq5omEL" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050730055013.GA57362@localhost.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Subject: Re: Growisofs seg faults with DVD-RAM. Anybody else seen this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 06:24:28 -0000 --enGqbSaueFq5omEL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Friday, 29 July 2005 at 22:50:13 -0700, Carl Delsey wrote: > I was trying to use growisofs to write to a DVD-RAM and it kept > seg faulting. It worked fine with a DVD-R. > > I tracked the problem down to place in the code where growisofs > tries to perform an operation on a file handle it has already > closed. > > I've implemented a workaround already. The problem is, that by my > reckoning, this should affect anybody who is trying to use a DVD-RAM > (not DVD+RW) with FreeBSD, but I haven't found any references to the > problem on the net. My guess is that DVD-RAM isn't popular enough, and that people who have had problems with it haven't had the understanding to track the bug down. > I'm wondering if anybody else has seen this problem, and if you've > found some other workaround for it? Or alternatively, you still have > the problem and my patch would be useful to you. :-) Is this a workaround or a fix? The latter is obviously preferable. Also, does this only affect FreeBSD, or is it general? In the former case, contact the maintainer (mail address in the Makefile); in the latter, contact the project. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --enGqbSaueFq5omEL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC6x0ZIubykFB6QiMRAh3EAJ4q3TinfGqGxgHy221RK/AY/VILEACfWJ6t 5m1YaNsyC9ly6CH/gaL+rgE= =bp24 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --enGqbSaueFq5omEL-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 06:44:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D89216A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 06:44:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from mail.stovebolt.com (mail.stovebolt.com [66.221.101.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4974843D46 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 06:44:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.101] (adsl-66-141-177-118.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [66.141.177.118]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.stovebolt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0BB3FC39 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:44:29 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:44:09 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.0 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Shell script help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 06:44:35 -0000 I'm working on a new port, and the one thing I can't seem to solve is the man pages. They install fine, but they're not formatted right. In the Makefile that is built from configure, this is the section that handles the man pages: @cd $(TOP_DIR)/doc; for i in *.n; \ do \ rm -f $(MAN_INSTALL_DIR)/`basename $$i`; \ rm -f $(MAN_INSTALL_DIR)/`basename iwidgets_$$i`; \ sed -e '/man\.macros/r man.macros' -e '/man\.macros/d' \ $$i > $(MAN_INSTALL_DIR)/`basename iwidgets_$$i`; \ chmod 444 $(MAN_INSTALL_DIR)/`basename iwidgets_$$i`; \ done; Running what I *thought* was the same sed command in the Makefile of the port doesn't solve the problem of the formatting of the man pages, but it doesn't generate any errors either: @${SED} -e '/man\.macros/r man.macros' -e '/man\.macros/d' ${WRKSRC}/doc/${f} \ > ${WRKDIR}/${f} Can someone explain what the sed command is doing? The man page isn't much help. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 06:57:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5089916A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 06:57:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70AB43D48 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 06:57:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([69.160.76.67]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with ESMTP id <20050730065745.RIKJ29002.mta9.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net>; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 02:57:45 -0400 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6641BB515; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 02:57:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 02:57:57 -0400 From: Parv To: Paul Schmehl Message-ID: <20050730065757.GA96641@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Schmehl , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shell script help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: f-q List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 06:57:50 -0000 in message , wrote Paul Schmehl thusly... > > Running what I *thought* was the same sed command in the Makefile > of the port doesn't solve the problem of the formatting of the man > pages, but it doesn't generate any errors either: > > @${SED} -e '/man\.macros/r man.macros' -e '/man\.macros/d' > ${WRKSRC}/doc/${f} \ > > ${WRKDIR}/${f} > > Can someone explain what the sed command is doing? The man page > isn't much help. In the 1st part, sed sends the output of file 'man.macros' to standard out if it exists (otherwise no worries) when sed sees the 'man\.macros' pattern. And the 2d part, just deletes that pattern. There in the sed(1) man page all is. Or, line by line try this ... rm -f q ; echo polka > p { echo p ; echo q; echo p; } | sed -e '/p/r p' -e '/p/d' { echo p ; echo q; echo p; } | sed -e '/p/r q' -e '/p/d' - Parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 07:07:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12DF16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:07:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C51843D46 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:07:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([69.160.76.67]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with ESMTP id <20050730070702.QICD24042.mta11.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net>; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 03:07:02 -0400 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BD589B515; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 03:07:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 03:07:28 -0400 From: Parv To: Paul Schmehl , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050730070728.GA97094@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Schmehl , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050730065757.GA96641@holestein.holy.cow> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050730065757.GA96641@holestein.holy.cow> Cc: Subject: Re: Shell script help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:07:05 -0000 in message <20050730065757.GA96641@holestein.holy.cow>, wrote Parv thusly... > > in message > , wrote > Paul Schmehl thusly... > > > > @${SED} -e '/man\.macros/r man.macros' ... > In the 1st part, sed sends the output of file 'man.macros' to ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ > standard out "[O]utput of file" should have been "contents of file". - Parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 08:26:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C7616A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:26:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D49A43D4C for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:26:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so753702wra for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:26:04 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=tpoWaF4bZvKN4NkpzRaFkq03CqgsXQ/FGV/3+hLfZksgDf2FgNoLYssu3nH1ZA6cPkrmCX9U1WWO+ALARj1YSb16WoAEGcxJ/Fu5RtiRqRy2E9T8P4SP3Udv3v3x/2SOjYITlHRrOregoX4zoEkRWXSPWg0S65uIgIebp8XYm5E= Received: by 10.54.42.38 with SMTP id p38mr1777477wrp; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:26:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:26:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 03:26:04 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: FreeBSD - Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Using a hard drive without partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:26:05 -0000 What are the ramifications, good or bad, of not using partitions on a FreeBSD disk?.... What is wrong with just a slice? Drive: Dangerously dedicated /dev/da0s1 newfs -O2 -U I don't see the point of labeling the disk into partitions, but I can't find any info on why not to do this. I did managed to setup a test drive this way and then grow it (RAID 5 array) with OCE, resize it with fdisk, then make it bigger with bsdlabel, and finally use growfs to extend the filesystem by 10GB. I had no problems doing it like this but everything I've read tells me to partition the disk. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 08:30:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C10116A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:30:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B58243D4C for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:30:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so753906wra for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:30:07 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=T7mTGcq9ldynpZM4nQJnhDlI5QMC1WQx6IRqTRgXyHb7hXDgvcp6DVKoAQS7Zsdl0jvttUWeYa5iZ4iOzFSLkfOdsUBYVQeR+ifSB6+b26vsuRa39yvb/peM3V8giGuWMUXvdSev8Ix8iSXRLNu9xtRtd7roDX3tbwTc5HEbwb4= Received: by 10.54.54.39 with SMTP id c39mr1602858wra; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:30:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:30:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 03:30:06 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20050728194329.GB12017@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050728194329.GB12017@xor.obsecurity.org> Cc: FreeBSD - Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:30:08 -0000 On 7/28/05, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 03:00:49PM -0500, Nikolas Britton wrote: > >=20 > > The kernel build failed when it tired to compile the r128drm device. >=20 > Show us the error. >=20 cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=3Dc99=20 -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../../.. -I../../../contrib/dev/acpica -I../../../contrib/altq -I../../../contrib/ipfilter -I../../../contrib/pf -I../../../contrib/dev/ath -I../../../contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I../../../contrib/ngatm -I../../../dev/twa -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=3D8000 --param inline-unit-growth=3D100 --param large-function-growth=3D1000 -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3D2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -ffreestanding -Werror vnode_if.c touch hack.c cc -shared -nostdlib hack.c -o hack.So rm -f hack.c MAKE=3Dmake sh ../../../conf/newvers.sh GENERIC cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=3Dc99=20 -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../../.. -I../../../contrib/dev/acpica -I../../../contrib/altq -I../../../contrib/ipfilter -I../../../contrib/pf -I../../../contrib/dev/ath -I../../../contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I../../../contrib/ngatm -I../../../dev/twa -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=3D8000 --param inline-unit-growth=3D100 --param large-function-growth=3D1000 -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3D2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -ffreestanding -Werror vers.c linking kernel r128_cce.o(.text+0x354): In function `r128_do_cleanup_cce': : undefined reference to `drm_free' r128_cce.o(.text+0x372): In function `r128_do_cleanup_cce': : undefined reference to `drm_irq_uninstall' r128_cce.o(.text+0x394): In function `r128_do_cleanup_cce': : undefined reference to `drm_ioremapfree' r128_cce.o(.text+0x3a8): In function `r128_do_cleanup_cce': : undefined reference to `drm_ati_pcigart_cleanup' r128_cce.o(.text+0x3d7): In function `r128_do_cleanup_cce': : undefined reference to `drm_ioremapfree' r128_cce.o(.text+0x3e3): In function `r128_do_cleanup_cce': : undefined reference to `drm_ioremapfree' r128_cce.o(.text+0x400): In function `r128_cce_init': : undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' r128_cce.o(.text+0x4ab): In function `r128_cce_init': : undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' r128_cce.o(.text+0x4bb): In function `r128_cce_init': : undefined reference to `drm_alloc' r128_cce.o(.text+0x504): In function `r128_cce_init': : undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' r128_cce.o(.text+0x575): In function `r128_cce_init': : undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' r128_cce.o(.text+0x7e2): In function `r128_cce_init': : undefined reference to `drm_order' r128_cce.o(.text+0x851): In function `r128_cce_init': : undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' r128_cce.o(.text+0x8e0): In function `r128_cce_init': : undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' r128_cce.o(.text+0xa1d): In function `r128_cce_init': : undefined reference to `drm_ioremap' r128_cce.o(.text+0xa2f): In function `r128_cce_init': : undefined reference to `drm_ioremap' r128_cce.o(.text+0xa41): In function `r128_cce_init': : undefined reference to `drm_ioremap' r128_cce.o(.text+0xab3): In function `r128_cce_init': : undefined reference to `drm_ati_pcigart_init' r128_cce.o(.text+0xc08): In function `r128_cce_start': : undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' r128_cce.o(.text+0xc87): In function `r128_cce_start': : undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' r128_cce.o(.text+0xd13): In function `r128_cce_stop': : undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' r128_cce.o(.text+0xe14): In function `r128_cce_reset': : undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' r128_cce.o(.text+0xea1): In function `r128_cce_reset': : undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' r128_cce.o(.text+0xedd): more undefined references to `drm_debug_flag' foll= ow r128_drv.o(.text+0xc): In function `r128_probe': : undefined reference to `drm_probe' r128_drv.o(.text+0xca): In function `r128_attach': : undefined reference to `drm_attach' r128_drv.o(.data+0x48): undefined reference to `drm_devclass' r128_drv.o(.data+0x94): undefined reference to `drm_detach' r128_irq.o(.text+0x48): In function `r128_driver_irq_handler': : undefined reference to `drm_vbl_send_signals' r128_state.o(.text+0xb): In function `r128_emit_clip_rects': : undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' r128_state.o(.text+0x2d0): In function `r128_cce_dispatch_flip': : undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' r128_state.o(.text+0x523): In function `r128_cce_dispatch_indirect': : undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' r128_state.o(.text+0x7e4): In function `r128_cce_clear': : undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' r128_state.o(.text+0x906): In function `r128_cce_clear': : undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' r128_state.o(.text+0xc0f): more undefined references to `drm_debug_flag' fo= llow r128_state.o(.text+0x39d3): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_alloc' r128_state.o(.text+0x39f5): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_alloc' r128_state.o(.text+0x3bc8): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_free' r128_state.o(.text+0x3bde): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_free' r128_state.o(.text+0x3d85): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_alloc' r128_state.o(.text+0x3d9c): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_alloc' r128_state.o(.text+0x3def): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_alloc' r128_state.o(.text+0x3f1c): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_free' r128_state.o(.text+0x3f32): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_free' r128_state.o(.text+0x3fb3): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_free' r128_state.o(.text+0x3fc3): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_free' r128_state.o(.text+0x3fde): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_free' r128_state.o(.text+0x4052): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_alloc' r128_state.o(.text+0x41bd): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_free' r128_state.o(.text+0x41cd): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_free' r128_state.o(.text+0x41dd): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_free' r128_state.o(.text+0x42ac): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_alloc' r128_state.o(.text+0x441f): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_free' r128_state.o(.text+0x442f): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_free' r128_state.o(.text+0x4444): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_free' r128_state.o(.text+0x4454): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_free' r128_state.o(.text+0x4467): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_free' r128_state.o(.text+0x447f): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_alloc' r128_state.o(.text+0x4588): In function `r128_cce_depth': : undefined reference to `drm_free' r128_state.o(.text+0x46d4): In function `r128_cce_stipple': : undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' r128_state.o(.text+0x4907): In function `r128_cce_indirect': : undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' r128_state.o(.text+0x4b92): In function `r128_getparam': : undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' r128_state.o(.text+0x4c5b): In function `r128_driver_prerelease': : undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC. spectra# ------------------------------------------------ spectra# diff GENERIC.old GENERIC 30c30 < makeoptions DEBUG=3D-g # Build kernel with gdb(1) debug = symbols --- > #makeoptions DEBUG=3D-g # Build kernel with gdb(1) debug = symbols 67,73c67,73 < options KDB # Enable kernel debugger support. < options DDB # Support DDB. < options GDB # Support remote GDB. < options INVARIANTS # Enable calls of extra sanity chec= king < options INVARIANT_SUPPORT # Extra sanity checks of internal structures, required by INVARIANTS < options WITNESS # Enable checks to detect deadlocks and cycles < options WITNESS_SKIPSPIN # Don't run witness on spinlocks for speed --- > #options KDB # Enable kernel debugger support. > #options DDB # Support DDB. > #options GDB # Support remote GDB. > #options INVARIANTS # Enable calls of extra sanity chec= king > #options INVARIANT_SUPPORT # Extra sanity checks of internal s= tructures, required by INVARIANTS > #options WITNESS # Enable checks to detect deadlocks= and cycles > #options WITNESS_SKIPSPIN # Don't run witness on spinlocks fo= r speed 152,154c152,160 < device vga # VGA video card driver < < device splash # Splash screen and screen saver su= pport --- > # Video support > device agp # AGP GART, support several AGP chipsets > device "r128drm" # ATI Rage 128 Direct Rendering Module > #options DRM_DEBUG # Debugging support for Direct Rendering = Modules > device vga # VGA video card driver > options VESA # VESA BIOS support > #options VESA_DEBUG # VESA Debugging Support > options SC_PIXEL_MODE # Console raster text mode (VESA graphic = modes) > device splash # Splash screen and screen saver support 163,164d168 < < device agp # support several AGP chipsets spectra# ------------------------------------------------ spectra# more /etc/make.conf #CPUTYPE=3Dp2 #KERNCONF=3DSPECTRA #COPTFLAGS=3D -Os -pipe BATCH=3Dyes #MAKE_IDEA=3Dyes PERL_VER=3D5.8.7 PERL_VERSION=3D5.8.7 PERL_ARCH=3Dmach NOPERL=3Dyo NO_PERL=3Dyo NO_PERL_WRAPPER=3Dyo spectra# From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 08:52:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA0916A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:52:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8558943D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:52:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so755199wra for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:52:30 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lOrjHBLk3uiCZUuhAUzE2Lb3TMdOn1Mp9wopvYvfvsIOoV7FkE0kiUFQ/XL1kH72CFN6VycGKdqhT5ROX3h4o6MgB0IgJsuu95t63AMPS+HlQy7pdYXDEj0BxOd0L7M+NNMGU8BReDb5cW5sgRtKbhULEEew/5IYxXYlsWQE+s4= Received: by 10.54.11.64 with SMTP id 64mr1592832wrk; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:52:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:52:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 03:52:30 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: Antoine Solomon In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: onboard ethernet support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:52:32 -0000 On 7/29/05, Antoine Solomon wrote: > Hello all, >=20 > has anyone tried to get a marvell Yukon 88E8053 pci-e gigabit ethernet > card working on fbsd 5.4? Is there any support for this? Not for 5.x, but I would try project evil and maybe it might be naively supported in 6.x http://www.pingwales.co.uk/tutorials/project-evil.html http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?q=3Dgroup%3A*.freebsd.*+Marvell+Yukon&= qt_s=3DSearch From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 08:54:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD8616A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:54:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B165A43D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:54:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z6so509480nzd for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:54:04 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dPEo2bAorfdp4i1qQBH+JDrY61BiqbBzBhi2JBrvWFN6tlSaWaGvVsFh7b7jkIpOFESowUWyz2/8VrePAHVVDqMTGjHYzsi5PwEU8vad4c9MpHu4H6s9A8peA/kP+d2BoHjA89UlZ4fLhLKZmV2U8PB/JRzBgGsNQRqbpaaAHCo= Received: by 10.36.81.19 with SMTP id e19mr1248413nzb; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:54:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?59.93.163.75? ([59.93.163.75]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 18sm5434224nzo.2005.07.30.01.54.01; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:54:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42EB4022.1070502@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:23:54 +0530 From: Subhro User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nikolas Britton References: <20050728194329.GB12017@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD - Questions , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:54:05 -0000 Nikolas Britton wrote: >On 7/28/05, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >>On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 03:00:49PM -0500, Nikolas Britton wrote: >> >> >>>The kernel build failed when it tired to compile the r128drm device. >>> >>> >>Show us the error. >> >> >> > >cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wredundant-decls >-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes >-Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 >-nostdinc -I- -I. -I../../.. -I../../../contrib/dev/acpica >-I../../../contrib/altq -I../../../contrib/ipfilter >-I../../../contrib/pf -I../../../contrib/dev/ath >-I../../../contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I../../../contrib/ngatm >-I../../../dev/twa -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common >-finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param >large-function-growth=1000 -mno-align-long-strings >-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 >-ffreestanding -Werror vnode_if.c >touch hack.c >cc -shared -nostdlib hack.c -o hack.So >rm -f hack.c >MAKE=make sh ../../../conf/newvers.sh GENERIC >cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wredundant-decls >-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes >-Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 >-nostdinc -I- -I. -I../../.. -I../../../contrib/dev/acpica >-I../../../contrib/altq -I../../../contrib/ipfilter >-I../../../contrib/pf -I../../../contrib/dev/ath >-I../../../contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I../../../contrib/ngatm >-I../../../dev/twa -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common >-finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param >large-function-growth=1000 -mno-align-long-strings >-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 >-ffreestanding -Werror vers.c >linking kernel >r128_cce.o(.text+0x354): In function `r128_do_cleanup_cce': >: undefined reference to `drm_free' >r128_cce.o(.text+0x372): In function `r128_do_cleanup_cce': >: undefined reference to `drm_irq_uninstall' >r128_cce.o(.text+0x394): In function `r128_do_cleanup_cce': >: undefined reference to `drm_ioremapfree' >r128_cce.o(.text+0x3a8): In function `r128_do_cleanup_cce': >: undefined reference to `drm_ati_pcigart_cleanup' >r128_cce.o(.text+0x3d7): In function `r128_do_cleanup_cce': >: undefined reference to `drm_ioremapfree' >r128_cce.o(.text+0x3e3): In function `r128_do_cleanup_cce': >: undefined reference to `drm_ioremapfree' >r128_cce.o(.text+0x400): In function `r128_cce_init': >: undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' >r128_cce.o(.text+0x4ab): In function `r128_cce_init': >: undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' >r128_cce.o(.text+0x4bb): In function `r128_cce_init': >: undefined reference to `drm_alloc' >r128_cce.o(.text+0x504): In function `r128_cce_init': >: undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' >r128_cce.o(.text+0x575): In function `r128_cce_init': >: undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' >r128_cce.o(.text+0x7e2): In function `r128_cce_init': >: undefined reference to `drm_order' >r128_cce.o(.text+0x851): In function `r128_cce_init': >: undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' >r128_cce.o(.text+0x8e0): In function `r128_cce_init': >: undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' >r128_cce.o(.text+0xa1d): In function `r128_cce_init': >: undefined reference to `drm_ioremap' >r128_cce.o(.text+0xa2f): In function `r128_cce_init': >: undefined reference to `drm_ioremap' >r128_cce.o(.text+0xa41): In function `r128_cce_init': >: undefined reference to `drm_ioremap' >r128_cce.o(.text+0xab3): In function `r128_cce_init': >: undefined reference to `drm_ati_pcigart_init' >r128_cce.o(.text+0xc08): In function `r128_cce_start': >: undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' >r128_cce.o(.text+0xc87): In function `r128_cce_start': >: undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' >r128_cce.o(.text+0xd13): In function `r128_cce_stop': >: undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' >r128_cce.o(.text+0xe14): In function `r128_cce_reset': >: undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' >r128_cce.o(.text+0xea1): In function `r128_cce_reset': >: undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' >r128_cce.o(.text+0xedd): more undefined references to `drm_debug_flag' follow >r128_drv.o(.text+0xc): In function `r128_probe': >: undefined reference to `drm_probe' >r128_drv.o(.text+0xca): In function `r128_attach': >: undefined reference to `drm_attach' >r128_drv.o(.data+0x48): undefined reference to `drm_devclass' >r128_drv.o(.data+0x94): undefined reference to `drm_detach' >r128_irq.o(.text+0x48): In function `r128_driver_irq_handler': >: undefined reference to `drm_vbl_send_signals' >r128_state.o(.text+0xb): In function `r128_emit_clip_rects': >: undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' >r128_state.o(.text+0x2d0): In function `r128_cce_dispatch_flip': >: undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' >r128_state.o(.text+0x523): In function `r128_cce_dispatch_indirect': >: undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' >r128_state.o(.text+0x7e4): In function `r128_cce_clear': >: undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' >r128_state.o(.text+0x906): In function `r128_cce_clear': >: undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' >r128_state.o(.text+0xc0f): more undefined references to `drm_debug_flag' follow >r128_state.o(.text+0x39d3): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_alloc' >r128_state.o(.text+0x39f5): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_alloc' >r128_state.o(.text+0x3bc8): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_free' >r128_state.o(.text+0x3bde): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_free' >r128_state.o(.text+0x3d85): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_alloc' >r128_state.o(.text+0x3d9c): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_alloc' >r128_state.o(.text+0x3def): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_alloc' >r128_state.o(.text+0x3f1c): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_free' >r128_state.o(.text+0x3f32): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_free' >r128_state.o(.text+0x3fb3): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_free' >r128_state.o(.text+0x3fc3): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_free' >r128_state.o(.text+0x3fde): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_free' >r128_state.o(.text+0x4052): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_alloc' >r128_state.o(.text+0x41bd): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_free' >r128_state.o(.text+0x41cd): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_free' >r128_state.o(.text+0x41dd): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_free' >r128_state.o(.text+0x42ac): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_alloc' >r128_state.o(.text+0x441f): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_free' >r128_state.o(.text+0x442f): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_free' >r128_state.o(.text+0x4444): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_free' >r128_state.o(.text+0x4454): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_free' >r128_state.o(.text+0x4467): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_free' >r128_state.o(.text+0x447f): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_alloc' >r128_state.o(.text+0x4588): In function `r128_cce_depth': >: undefined reference to `drm_free' >r128_state.o(.text+0x46d4): In function `r128_cce_stipple': >: undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' >r128_state.o(.text+0x4907): In function `r128_cce_indirect': >: undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' >r128_state.o(.text+0x4b92): In function `r128_getparam': >: undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' >r128_state.o(.text+0x4c5b): In function `r128_driver_prerelease': >: undefined reference to `drm_debug_flag' >*** Error code 1 > >Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC. >spectra# > > >------------------------------------------------ >spectra# diff GENERIC.old GENERIC >30c30 >< makeoptions DEBUG=-g # Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols >--- > > >>#makeoptions DEBUG=-g # Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols >> >> >67,73c67,73 >< options KDB # Enable kernel debugger support. >< options DDB # Support DDB. >< options GDB # Support remote GDB. >< options INVARIANTS # Enable calls of extra sanity checking >< options INVARIANT_SUPPORT # Extra sanity checks of >internal structures, required by INVARIANTS >< options WITNESS # Enable checks to detect >deadlocks and cycles >< options WITNESS_SKIPSPIN # Don't run witness on >spinlocks for speed >--- > > >>#options KDB # Enable kernel debugger support. >>#options DDB # Support DDB. >>#options GDB # Support remote GDB. >>#options INVARIANTS # Enable calls of extra sanity checking >>#options INVARIANT_SUPPORT # Extra sanity checks of internal structures, required by INVARIANTS >>#options WITNESS # Enable checks to detect deadlocks and cycles >>#options WITNESS_SKIPSPIN # Don't run witness on spinlocks for speed >> >> >152,154c152,160 >< device vga # VGA video card driver >< >< device splash # Splash screen and screen saver support >--- > > >># Video support >>device agp # AGP GART, support several AGP chipsets >>device "r128drm" # ATI Rage 128 Direct Rendering Module >>#options DRM_DEBUG # Debugging support for Direct Rendering Modules >>device vga # VGA video card driver >>options VESA # VESA BIOS support >>#options VESA_DEBUG # VESA Debugging Support >>options SC_PIXEL_MODE # Console raster text mode (VESA graphic modes) >>device splash # Splash screen and screen saver support >> >> >163,164d168 >< >< device agp # support several AGP chipsets >spectra# > > >------------------------------------------------ >spectra# more /etc/make.conf >#CPUTYPE=p2 >#KERNCONF=SPECTRA >#COPTFLAGS= -Os -pipe >BATCH=yes >#MAKE_IDEA=yes > >PERL_VER=5.8.7 >PERL_VERSION=5.8.7 >PERL_ARCH=mach >NOPERL=yo >NO_PERL=yo >NO_PERL_WRAPPER=yo >spectra# >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > -O2 is known to create broken binaries. Reduce it to -O and recompile. Report back if it still does not work. Thanks S. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 09:23:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E98716A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:23:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46F843D46 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:23:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so756892wra for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 02:23:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nk4X0wiAcT+YmEgRNoX4qpOuvEPVfE3zq7m/iAkOUkxFdb8psK+bQpak0p60jDJPyLRyH0fLSMvd0lBmikpKT26BFDs9bT4bwtKoYyESBoHxDSmEtCRbw+kXkEGLjP4/xSKJwdfoqwfIfeYCvFwsjGeVCFOTh8Ojpl2D0EPU1ig= Received: by 10.54.45.14 with SMTP id s14mr1808796wrs; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 02:23:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 02:23:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 04:23:45 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: Subhro In-Reply-To: <42EB4022.1070502@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050728194329.GB12017@xor.obsecurity.org> <42EB4022.1070502@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD - Questions , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:23:46 -0000 On 7/30/05, Subhro wrote: > -O2 is known to create broken binaries. Reduce it to -O and recompile. > Report back if it still does not work. >=20 -O2 is the default now for 6.x. I just added "device drm" and am rebuilding it to see if that works, will post the results when it's done From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 10:06:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FFCC16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:06:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (smtprelay01.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04EFE43D4C for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:06:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 4414 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2005 10:05:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([pbs]775067@[217.187.178.48]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 30 Jul 2005 10:05:21 -0000 Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:05:42 +0200 From: Fabian Keil To: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Message-ID: <20050730120542.7f0008bb@localhost> In-Reply-To: References: <1f75ab0e05072510117c119a1d@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Signature_Sat__30_Jul_2005_12_05_42_+0200_H+ciiWPerBl_=4vh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Cc: Brian Henning , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: burncd - verify burn X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:06:04 -0000 --Signature_Sat__30_Jul_2005_12_05_42_+0200_H+ciiWPerBl_=4vh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) wrote: > Brian Henning writes: >=20 > > I would like to know a process to verify that I my cd burner has > > burned an ISO file correctly with burncd. I know I can take some > > precautions like checking the md5sum of the iso during a transfer from > > the Internet. I also read on the Internet that burncd does puts some > > extra padding at the end of the cd. I am not sure if that is true or > > not. Could someone tell me how to verify a cd burn? >=20 > Here's a crummy script I just used to burn and verify a CD, but I've > only tested it with the "cdrecord" setup. Older versions of it worked > with "burncd" on older OS versions, but I can tell you that the reason > I'm using "cdrecord" is that my manual efforts to do this with > "burncd" on 5.4-RELEASE (and maybe 5.4-STABLE a couple weeks ago) > failed, because I couldn't "dd" a CD burned with "burncd". (IE, I > couldn't sucessfully "dd" /dev/acd0, while I could "dd" /dev/cd0). >=20 > (Search this for "diff" to find the "verify". ISO images generally > get an extra two blocks of something on the CD "for run-out". See > "-isosize" description of "cdrecord" manpage.) Not generally, only if you burn in TAO mode. BTW you can use readcd -c2scan to check the burning quality at a deeper level and there even is a patch out there to make reading c1 error pointers possible. Haven't tested it though.=20 Fabian --=20 http://www.fabiankeil.de/ --Signature_Sat__30_Jul_2005_12_05_42_+0200_H+ciiWPerBl_=4vh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC61D2oomUOj0wp30RAjdCAKCKB7Bk+WM6igCX3+dLXCGBnhLp+ACfRYIj WdJHRsvidPLtZyS2fkMbY8o= =eny4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Sat__30_Jul_2005_12_05_42_+0200_H+ciiWPerBl_=4vh-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 10:14:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD7016A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:14:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@math.ku.dk) Received: from imf.math.ku.dk (fw.math.ku.dk [130.225.103.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB4743D48 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:14:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@math.ku.dk) Received: from imf.math.ku.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imf.math.ku.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A73B12005; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:14:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from shannon.math.ku.dk (shannon.math.ku.dk [130.225.103.12]) by imf.math.ku.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:14:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:14:25 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=C3=B8rgaard?= To: cpghost In-Reply-To: <20050729232511.GA3040@epia2.farid-hajji.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: scanimage -L doesn't work as normal user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:14:34 -0000 On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, cpghost wrote: > > Then as ordinary user: > > $ sane-find-scanner -q > > found USB scanner (vendor=0x04b8 [EPSON], product=0x0121 [EPSON > > Scanner]) at libusb:/dev/usb0:/dev/ugen0 > > $ scanimage -L > > > > No scanners were identified. > > This is normally a problem with permissions. You could set them > to 0666 in /etc/devfs.conf, and [re]start devfs with > # /etc/rc.d/devfs start This was also what I thought, but I can't seem to get it right: In my devfs.conf I have: # Allow all users to use the scanner perm ugen0 0666 perm usb 0666 perm usb0 0666 perm usb1 0666 But when I plugin the scanner, ugen0 and ugen0.* has permissions crw-r--r-- sane-find-scanner doesn't show any scanners. Then I manually set the permissions on ugen0 to give write permissions to all, and sane-find-scanner finds the scanner, but scanimage still doesn't work. I would expect either both or none to work. To investigate furhter, I ran sane-find-scanner verbose: This is sane-find-scanner from sane-backends 1.0.15 searching for SCSI scanners: checking /dev/scanner... failed to open (Invalid argument) checking /dev/scanner0... failed to open (Invalid argument) ... searching for USB scanners: checking /dev/uscanner... failed to open (Invalid argument) checking /dev/uscanner0... failed to open (Invalid argument) ... device 0x04b8/0x0121 is not configured that is when there is no write permissions to ugen0, setting write permissions on ugen0 the last device line becomes found USB scanner (vendor=0x04b8 [EPSON], product=0x0121 [EPSON Scanner]) at libusb:/dev/usb0:/dev/ugen0 Unfortunately, running scanimage verbose doesn't show anything about probing for devices. Thanks, Erik GnuPG: http://www.locolomo.org/home/norgaard/norgaard.gpg.asc pub 1024D/11D11F9E 2003-08-15 Erik Norgaard Key fingerprint = C394 81C4 D137 EEE5 39BE 82D5 3E6B FB3E 11D1 1F9E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 10:23:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08F616A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:23:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F94243D53 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:23:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so760177wra for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 03:23:58 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kFLD/mFoyuWu04/l14i9DOmOAyufa7NGU8VNKYfTBAE1Cq46m3SXqIH3baJJzzLQ77NbyatTv1yAJHv3bplXoO8/XeDxJVLaI4fXNLisev0d+FGU8vdn19zxZA2Ie60yQk6ONeQH///mDQCZFFvqtvoIf90FkQzIhkWx7mtRD9s= Received: by 10.54.44.46 with SMTP id r46mr1808852wrr; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 03:23:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 03:23:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 05:23:58 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: Subhro In-Reply-To: <42EB4269.7030307@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <42EB4269.7030307@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD - Questions Subject: Re: onboard ethernet support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:24:00 -0000 On 7/30/05, Subhro wrote: > Nikolas Britton wrote: >=20 > >On 7/29/05, Antoine Solomon wrote: > > > > > >>Hello all, > >> > >>has anyone tried to get a marvell Yukon 88E8053 pci-e gigabit ethernet > >>card working on fbsd 5.4? Is there any support for this? > >> > >> > > > >Not for 5.x, but I would try project evil and maybe it might be > >naively supported in 6.x > > > >http://www.pingwales.co.uk/tutorials/project-evil.html > >http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?q=3Dgroup%3A*.freebsd.*+Marvell+Yuk= on&qt_s=3DSearch > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.= org" > > > > > > > I bet something is wrong somewhere. I remember seeing that chipset on > Asus K8V-SE Deluxe. And that worked for me without any troubles with the > sk0 driver. However Nikolas has to say that its not supported. Anyone > would please correct? >=20 spectra# man sk | grep -i marv Also supported is the Marvell Semiconductor 88E1000* gigabit PHY. I don't no for a fact that it's not supported, just an edu. guess...=20 his card is a 88E8 btw From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 10:42:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4509616A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:42:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wash@wananchi.com) Received: from ns2.wananchi.com (mail.wananchi.com [62.8.64.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B224943D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:41:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wash@wananchi.com) Received: from wash by ns2.wananchi.com with local (Exim 4.51 #0 (FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE)) id 1Dyomu-000Jyw-B4 by authid for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:41:52 +0300 Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:41:52 +0300 From: Odhiambo Washington To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050730104152.GH17171@ns2.wananchi.com> Mail-Followup-To: Odhiambo Washington , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Disclaimer: Any views expressed in this message, where not explicitly attributed otherwise, are mine alone!. X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.9i (2005-03-13) X-Designation: Systems Administrator, Wananchi Online Ltd. X-Location: Nairobi, KE, East Africa. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: Problem with IPFilter/IPNAT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:42:00 -0000 I am using IPFilter and IPNat on several FreeBSD boxes. They are mostly configured the same. Each box has two interfaces, public and internal, and acts as a router to the LAN which is 'behind' it. The LAN machines use the FreeBSD as the gateway, as well as a DNS server. I run cache-only config. The problem I have is that when, for any reason, the public link goes down, the machines on the LAN timeout when communicating. I can simulate this by simply pulling out the connection from the $ext_iface (assume this is ADSL or something like that) which is connected to the ISP upstream. I don't know if it is my NAT configuration causing this. Here is the /etc/ipnat.rules that I use: I'd want a situation where network communications within the LAN should not be affected when the circuit to the ISP is down since it is only used for web traffic and for the mail server on the FreeBSD router to send outbound e-mails, not local e-mails. # rl0 is the internal interface. rl1 is external interface. # These redirection rules are to force users on the LAN # to go through Squid cache. # First we let this machine access itself because there is a web server # on it. # Redirect direct web traffic to local web server. rdr rl0 192.168.100.31/32 port 80 -> 192.168.100.31 port 80 tcp rdr rl0 192.168.100.31/32 port 443 -> 192.168.100.31 port 443 tcp # Transparently redirect all outgoing web traffic through squid on # port 3128 rdr rl0 0.0.0.0/0 port 80 -> 127.0.0.1 port 3128 # Also all SMTP Connections must go via localhost rdr rl0 0.0.0.0/0 port 25 -> 127.0.0.1 port 25 # Now do NAT, but only for packets that are NOT local. map rl1 from 192.168.100.0/24 ! to 192.168.100.0/24 -> 0/32 portmap tcp/udp auto map rl1 from 192.168.100.0/24 ! to 192.168.100.0/24 -> 0/32 What am I missing or doing wrong here??? -Wash http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html -- +======================================================================+ |\ _,,,---,,_ | Odhiambo Washington Zzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ | Wananchi Online Ltd. www.wananchi.com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'| Tel: +254 20 313985-9 +254 20 313922 '---''(_/--' `-'\_) | GSM: +254 722 743223 +254 733 744121 +======================================================================+ Due to lack of disk space, this fortune database has been discontinued. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 11:07:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE3F16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:07:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (blackend.org [212.11.35.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5750843D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:07:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from gothic.blackend.org (gothic.blackend.org [192.168.1.203]) by abigail.blackend.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6UB6NwM021158; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:06:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@abigail.blackend.org) Received: from gothic.blackend.org (localhost.blackend.org [127.0.0.1]) by gothic.blackend.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6UB6NYa000690; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:06:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@gothic.blackend.org) Received: (from marc@localhost) by gothic.blackend.org (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6UB6Ivo000689; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:06:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:06:18 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille To: Erik =?iso-8859-1?B?TsO4cmdhYXJk?= Message-ID: <20050730110618.GB596@gothic.blackend.org> References: <20050729232511.GA3040@epia2.farid-hajji.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Useless-Header: blackend.org X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: questions@freebsd.org, cpghost Subject: Re: scanimage -L doesn't work as normal user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:07:41 -0000 On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 12:14:25PM +0200, Erik Nørgaard wrote: > On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, cpghost wrote: > > > > Then as ordinary user: > > > $ sane-find-scanner -q > > > found USB scanner (vendor=0x04b8 [EPSON], product=0x0121 [EPSON > > > Scanner]) at libusb:/dev/usb0:/dev/ugen0 > > > $ scanimage -L > > > > > > No scanners were identified. > > > > This is normally a problem with permissions. You could set them > > to 0666 in /etc/devfs.conf, and [re]start devfs with > > # /etc/rc.d/devfs start > > This was also what I thought, but I can't seem to get it right: > > In my devfs.conf I have: > # Allow all users to use the scanner > perm ugen0 0666 > > perm usb 0666 > perm usb0 0666 > perm usb1 0666 > > But when I plugin the scanner, ugen0 and ugen0.* has permissions > crw-r--r-- > [...] You have to use uscanner not ugenX You should read the Handbook section related to the image scanners: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/scanners.html Marc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 11:38:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9947316A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:38:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cisco.kid@wixb.com) Received: from cheyenne.wixb.com (cheyenne.wixb.com [65.43.82.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CDD643D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:38:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cisco.kid@wixb.com) Received: from coors.wixb.com (coors.wixb.com [10.43.82.5]) by cheyenne.wixb.com (8.13.5.Alpha2/8.13.5.Alpha2) with ESMTP id j6UBcIIa014714 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 06:38:18 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.2.5.1.2.20050730063719.00bdf968@wixb.com> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 06:38:18 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "J.D. Bronson" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: openssl 0.9.8 with 5.4-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:38:19 -0000 I know this may not be supported, but I was wondering if anyone was successful in installing the src of openssl 0.9.8 into the base install of 5.4 (overwriting the originals) ? thanks- -- J.D. Bronson Information Services Aurora Health Care - Milwaukee, Wisconsin Office: 414.978.8282 // Fax: 414.314.8787 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 11:41:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 499E816A41F; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:41:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@math.ku.dk) Received: from imf.math.ku.dk (fw.math.ku.dk [130.225.103.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57C643D46; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:41:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@math.ku.dk) Received: from imf.math.ku.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imf.math.ku.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D857C1B35B; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:41:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from shannon.math.ku.dk (shannon.math.ku.dk [130.225.103.12]) by imf.math.ku.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:41:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:41:20 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=C3=B8rgaard?= To: Marc Fonvieille In-Reply-To: <20050730110618.GB596@gothic.blackend.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: questions@freebsd.org, cpghost Subject: Re: scanimage -L doesn't work as normal user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:41:26 -0000 On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 12:14:25PM +0200, Erik N=C3=B8rgaard wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, cpghost wrote: > > > > > > Then as ordinary user: > > > > $ sane-find-scanner -q > > > > found USB scanner (vendor=3D0x04b8 [EPSON], product=3D0x0121 [EPSON > > > > Scanner]) at libusb:/dev/usb0:/dev/ugen0 > > > > $ scanimage -L > > > > > > > > No scanners were identified. > > > > > > This is normally a problem with permissions. You could set them > > > to 0666 in /etc/devfs.conf, and [re]start devfs with > > > # /etc/rc.d/devfs start > > > > This was also what I thought, but I can't seem to get it right: > > > > In my devfs.conf I have: > > # Allow all users to use the scanner > > perm ugen0 0666 > > > > perm usb 0666 > > perm usb0 0666 > > perm usb1 0666 > > > > But when I plugin the scanner, ugen0 and ugen0.* has permissions > > crw-r--r-- > > > [...] > > You have to use uscanner not ugenX > You should read the Handbook section related to the image scanners: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/scanners.html Thanks, I did read it. But if that is the problem, then please explain why I can scan as root but not as ordinary user? When I create a link uscanner0 -> ugen0 that link gets permissions lrwxr-xr-x and I can't change those. I then run as normal user $ sane-find-scanner -q found USB scanner (UNKNOWN vendor and product) at device /dev/uscanner0 found USB scanner (vendor=3D0x04b8 [EPSON], product=3D0x0121 [EPSON Scanner= ]) at libusb:/dev/usb0:/dev/ugen0 So you see, it's not that I can't find the scanner. It is beyond me to understand why sane-find-scanner works as documented but scanimage don't. According to documentation this scanner uses the snapscan backend, in snapscan.conf I have: firmware /usr/local/etc/sane.d/Esfw41.bin # If not automatically found you may manually specify a device name. # For USB scanners also specify bus=3Dusb, e.g. # /dev/usb/scanner0 bus=3Dusb #/dev/uscanner0 bus=3Dusb usb /dev/uscanner0 I have tried specifying the usb-scanner, both as written in the handbook and as suggested in the file and without any entries. No change. I don't think this file is read, because that would probably require that scanimage first identify the backend. Thanks, Erik GnuPG: http://www.locolomo.org/home/norgaard/norgaard.gpg.asc pub 1024D/11D11F9E 2003-08-15 Erik Norgaard Key fingerprint =3D C394 81C4 D137 EEE5 39BE 82D5 3E6B FB3E 11D1 1F9E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 11:41:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6880216A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:41:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard-seibert@suscom.net) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net (smtp3.suscom.net [64.78.119.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41F643D46 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:41:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard-seibert@suscom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034672101C8 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:41:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 15284-01-22 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:41:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AC372101C2 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:41:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:41:35 -0400 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: Gerard@smtp3.suscom.net, Seibert@smtp3.suscom.net Message-Id: <20050730074129.025C.GERARD-SEIBERT@suscom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="===[S/MIME_RFC2633]===42EB6768.2DDD4DC==="; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.21.03 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Command Not Found error message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gerard-seibert@suscom.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:41:41 -0000 --===[S/MIME_RFC2633]===42EB6768.2DDD4DC=== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable When running 'portsclean' from CRON, this message is sent to the root mailbox. In fact, there are several of them in the mailbox. I do not know what it means. /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgtools.rb:31: command not found: uname = -rm uname(1) could be broken - cannot parse the output:=20 make: not found ** Error occured reading /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf: uninitialized constant PkgConfig::OS_PLATFORM When I run the 'uname -rm' command from the command line, it produces this output. 5.4-RELEASE I386 --=20 Gerard E. Seibert gerard-seibert@suscom.net --===[S/MIME_RFC2633]===42EB6768.2DDD4DC=== Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIIO4wYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIIO1DCCDtACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMAsGCSqGSIb3DQEHAaCCDRIw ggJaMIIBwwICAaUwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwdTELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxGDAWBgNVBAoTD0dURSBD b3Jwb3JhdGlvbjEnMCUGA1UECxMeR1RFIEN5YmVyVHJ1c3QgU29sdXRpb25zLCBJbmMuMSMwIQYD VQQDExpHVEUgQ3liZXJUcnVzdCBHbG9iYWwgUm9vdDAeFw05ODA4MTMwMDI5MDBaFw0xODA4MTMy MzU5MDBaMHUxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMRgwFgYDVQQKEw9HVEUgQ29ycG9yYXRpb24xJzAlBgNVBAsT HkdURSBDeWJlclRydXN0IFNvbHV0aW9ucywgSW5jLjEjMCEGA1UEAxMaR1RFIEN5YmVyVHJ1c3Qg R2xvYmFsIFJvb3QwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAJUPoLbwUJzoeseIzd0XDi6w lNAbPQ72lMCKlMcGyJCXyLhkGnp+bDxT4Tcoc2B/spdTB59T+W1YlNKvjW2IZ4Dm7bKVz3IxyqUc crpcAudkQuf5qSzWOg2sjUKqJAE55pw/AYVXDViHRfjThaqTaSaFcEiAPxIVx3m0HwUvO2KZAgMB AAEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQADgYEAbesbCele2VHbZyJhpCo8SHfjoHym3nOiFAOFPfurDjDFgxYz gRMInns0Tt9AyHTXuX3c9HZVfZtjVBjp8OrzXLHZi0IeucCVTrr61eJ89Whhv47sBZdfW7DXo4U0 xCSnDQ+Vk+/LlNieH51chW3Hqq5PHyK1zZWtuqfM+asLen8wggUqMIIEk6ADAgECAgQCAAKaMA0G CSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMHUxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMRgwFgYDVQQKEw9HVEUgQ29ycG9yYXRpb24xJzAl BgNVBAsTHkdURSBDeWJlclRydXN0IFNvbHV0aW9ucywgSW5jLjEjMCEGA1UEAxMaR1RFIEN5YmVy VHJ1c3QgR2xvYmFsIFJvb3QwHhcNMDIwODI3MTkwMjAwWhcNMTIwODI3MjM1OTAwWjCB3DELMAkG A1UEBhMCR0IxFzAVBgNVBAoTDkNvbW9kbyBMaW1pdGVkMR0wGwYDVQQLExRDb21vZG8gVHJ1c3Qg TmV0d29yazFGMEQGA1UECxM9VGVybXMgYW5kIENvbmRpdGlvbnMgb2YgdXNlOiBodHRwOi8vd3d3 LmNvbW9kby5uZXQvcmVwb3NpdG9yeTEfMB0GA1UECxMWKGMpMjAwMiBDb21vZG8gTGltaXRlZDEs MCoGA1UEAxMjQ29tb2RvIENsYXNzIDMgU2VjdXJpdHkgU2VydmljZXMgQ0EwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDyDLbPh4TqCnEUUi3oV1xJUjrPw/BCbWLy/qbpPjx4ZAMOIH5r a2mHiVQ4BfTaxwVABRh3fvxriw4cooLMrIWbOenLS0gYSGso5MLRW64DqX6YL0wTcd+wKQxOqqY3 Jji50ERSgpA+cEjWepsJB7yU5PRVLPK3Kr4ckRxqi4NNNWwQ4XPaIdli2PEZsPHnII21l0cjS2qB NRuvSOA2qJBMTUzs9YjOxrHQL/95kAHYUWTnL7EIjV3PrfqygJarrIu1TLR0wkcT7egjMfQquWEb vc6kWzcxveWcnPuyD9fFO7/MWqsPyIZAiSKmkCDTs2y+EvPjICy7wa5DWtoWdugfAgMBAAGjggHZ MIIB1TBFBgNVHR8EPjA8MDqgOKA2hjRodHRwOi8vd3d3LnB1YmxpYy10cnVzdC5jb20vY2dpLWJp bi9DUkwvMjAxOC9jZHAuY3JsMB0GA1UdDgQWBBQ24Oh8bZ1Fke6Z5UJ2TXCzUDCsXjCBkgYDVR0g BIGKMIGHMEkGCiqGSIb4YwECAQUwOzA5BggrBgEFBQcCARYtaHR0cDovL3d3dy5wdWJsaWMtdHJ1 c3QuY29tL0NQUy9PbW5pUm9vdC5odG1sMDoGDCsGAQQBsjEBAgEDATAqMCgGCCsGAQUFBwIBFhxo dHRwczovL3NlY3VyZS5jb21vZG8ubmV0L0NQMIGJBgNVHSMEgYEwf6F5pHcwdTELMAkGA1UEBhMC VVMxGDAWBgNVBAoTD0dURSBDb3Jwb3JhdGlvbjEnMCUGA1UECxMeR1RFIEN5YmVyVHJ1c3QgU29s dXRpb25zLCBJbmMuMSMwIQYDVQQDExpHVEUgQ3liZXJUcnVzdCBHbG9iYWwgUm9vdIICAaUwKwYD VR0QBCQwIoAPMjAwMjA4MjcxOTAyMjRagQ8yMDA5MDgyNzIzNTkwMFowDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgHm MA8GA1UdEwQIMAYBAf8CAQAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAOh4kb9rbNmz+OnM53c1qHGmhAB9v 1K7VH9SIKaUhwlf2VXsw59Jk1g7EqnA8dnTiKq7HRmcykslL8afX4Fa89nIQnX+wddadV7VxharE OqdLuOwP5tL4/7XN1EUlrOoGp4q1zTIi5CGSG+/ONK4wRBrum3/wlBGGiocZASg6z7MwggWCMIIE aqADAgECAhEA98Xjp63H2/PEjJhpu+IDxTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADCB3DELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0Ix FzAVBgNVBAoTDkNvbW9kbyBMaW1pdGVkMR0wGwYDVQQLExRDb21vZG8gVHJ1c3QgTmV0d29yazFG MEQGA1UECxM9VGVybXMgYW5kIENvbmRpdGlvbnMgb2YgdXNlOiBodHRwOi8vd3d3LmNvbW9kby5u ZXQvcmVwb3NpdG9yeTEfMB0GA1UECxMWKGMpMjAwMiBDb21vZG8gTGltaXRlZDEsMCoGA1UEAxMj Q29tb2RvIENsYXNzIDMgU2VjdXJpdHkgU2VydmljZXMgQ0EwHhcNMDUwMzEyMDAwMDAwWhcNMDYw MzEyMjM1OTU5WjCB4zE1MDMGA1UECxMsQ29tb2RvIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsgLSBQRVJTT05BIE5P VCBWQUxJREFURUQxRjBEBgNVBAsTPVRlcm1zIGFuZCBDb25kaXRpb25zIG9mIHVzZTogaHR0cDov L3d3dy5jb21vZG8ubmV0L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkxHzAdBgNVBAsTFihjKTIwMDMgQ29tb2RvIExpbWl0 ZWQxFzAVBgNVBAMTDkdlcmFyZCBTZWliZXJ0MSgwJgYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhlnZXJhcmQtc2VpYmVy dEBzdXNjb20ubmV0MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDtasrWNjF6EEoZi9QwDRkw sX1LdN1LDBwCr8WTwfpPZ88HTUSuGSJA/tNlmMlx+QFqBUiTAqXOg8TeXyF0iQ3yg0oUIl1ODiPl Tq4lPPRd0iRkG5MspXim2EGC22knpXFqj/hOTk42jKuE9nBCfOQ8ShAhS0iC7HEVekO0UO1IbwID AQABo4IBuDCCAbQwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUNuDofG2dRZHumeVCdk1ws1AwrF4wHQYDVR0OBBYEFHW/ iXZTCEgMYSYD1YrP6KCDEaiYMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIFoDAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMCAGA1UdJQQZ MBcGCCsGAQUFBwMEBgsrBgEEAbIxAQMFAjBGBgNVHSAEPzA9MDsGDCsGAQQBsjEBAgEBATArMCkG CCsGAQUFBwIBFh1odHRwczovL3NlY3VyZS5jb21vZG8ubmV0L0NQUzCBsAYDVR0fBIGoMIGlMDig NqA0hjJodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQ2xhc3MzU2VjdXJpdHlTZXJ2aWNlc18zLmNybDA6 oDigNoY0aHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21vZG9jYS5jb20vQ2xhc3MzU2VjdXJpdHlTZXJ2aWNlc18zLmNy bDAtoCugKYEnQ2xhc3MzU2VjdXJpdHlTZXJ2aWNlc18zQGNybC5jb21vZG8ubmV0MBEGCWCGSAGG +EIBAQQEAwIFIDAkBgNVHREEHTAbgRlnZXJhcmQtc2VpYmVydEBzdXNjb20ubmV0MA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4IBAQDK/Y0NA653aN11AFQTMbdo3iJObltesIv3+N9Vs97/zV21UbGKoelVFnRfC1CD T+BOfDOgwUlSH/Jm4sf9ySfMbxpIAm97CLCJy+Wh6KkK+91KHv3dCwATrqLKc5OliRD6e9S8lNBQ slgEf3tJFwq18oINwsm7F+zczH4eGa2atryMYAAlRQ+6HM6sdJlqEmyNyYcatfsJxMwJurgEs4kJ 0n1w7p4XqpLEx+kBviNFBHDTj923KeI0iHdcKwp8+4uvb9/m61s0E4w86nsPVmqsYUzSOxcRo3N0 y+jFX9A4wh9ac0o/gcJsX1LPztO/Ar1ZguI7MoLO/xoIOZn72m39MYIBmTCCAZUCAQEwgfIwgdwx CzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5Db21vZG8gTGltaXRlZDEdMBsGA1UECxMUQ29tb2RvIFRy dXN0IE5ldHdvcmsxRjBEBgNVBAsTPVRlcm1zIGFuZCBDb25kaXRpb25zIG9mIHVzZTogaHR0cDov L3d3dy5jb21vZG8ubmV0L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkxHzAdBgNVBAsTFihjKTIwMDIgQ29tb2RvIExpbWl0 ZWQxLDAqBgNVBAMTI0NvbW9kbyBDbGFzcyAzIFNlY3VyaXR5IFNlcnZpY2VzIENBAhEA98Xjp63H 2/PEjJhpu+IDxTAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIGAMxTDy15xBZiPG/mkMbLn39Ks zPmZE+id70TAzmFYU85XGHehBmoUARwIsyVDu/+xHV+6eEzNOrGtyv7wr+bcDBXUFhen1OBlnH3K 0xbKMaieLJoxjoUZSPsqbejIHQJ2zF1LCgOA2WniOkFMBZS6/DZMSO0eF2r0FZ//V7NS48U= --===[S/MIME_RFC2633]===42EB6768.2DDD4DC===-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 12:02:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3EF16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:02:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (blackend.org [212.11.35.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11EDE43D46 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:02:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from gothic.blackend.org (gothic.blackend.org [192.168.1.203]) by abigail.blackend.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6UC2II4021934; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:02:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@abigail.blackend.org) Received: from gothic.blackend.org (localhost.blackend.org [127.0.0.1]) by gothic.blackend.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6UC2IIV000880; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:02:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@gothic.blackend.org) Received: (from marc@localhost) by gothic.blackend.org (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6UC2I5A000879; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:02:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:02:18 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille To: Erik =?iso-8859-1?B?TsO4cmdhYXJk?= Message-ID: <20050730120218.GC596@gothic.blackend.org> References: <20050730110618.GB596@gothic.blackend.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Useless-Header: blackend.org X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: questions@freebsd.org, cpghost Subject: Re: scanimage -L doesn't work as normal user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:02:23 -0000 On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 01:41:20PM +0200, Erik Nørgaard wrote: > > Thanks, I did read it. But if that is the problem, then please > explain why I can scan as root but not as ordinary user? > Wrong perms on ugen0, read carefully: 7.6.4 Allowing Scanner Access to Other Users if you want ugen0 appears with the right permissions once you plug your scanner. The current devfs scheme you use (Cf. your previous mail) should work if you boot directly with your scanner plugged and not if you plug it later. > When I create a link uscanner0 -> ugen0 that link gets permissions > lrwxr-xr-x and I can't change those. I then run as normal user > > $ sane-find-scanner -q > found USB scanner (UNKNOWN vendor and product) at device /dev/uscanner0 > found USB scanner (vendor=0x04b8 [EPSON], product=0x0121 [EPSON Scanner]) at > libusb:/dev/usb0:/dev/ugen0 > [...] This is a problem, a USB scanner under FreeBSD should use uscanner(8) driver nothing else. I assume your scanner is not seen by uscanner(8), i.e. not supported or just not defined in uscanner.c Try to add an entry for your scanner in uscanner.c, rebuild uscanner.ko, etc. and retry. Marc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 12:03:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D429C16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:03:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@orbweavers.co.uk) Received: from mail.orbweavers.co.uk (213-152-38-100.dsl.eclipse.net.uk [213.152.38.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA5743D48 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:03:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@orbweavers.co.uk) Received: from 192.168.0.5 (localhost.orbweavers.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) by mail.orbweavers.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7023B2434 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:03:56 +0100 (BST) Received: from 192.168.0.200 (SquirrelMail authenticated user martin) by 192.168.0.5 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:03:56 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4377.192.168.0.200.1122725036.squirrel@192.168.0.5> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:03:56 +0100 (BST) From: martin@orbweavers.co.uk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: FreeBSD Active Directory Server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:03:59 -0000 Has anyone any experience trying to make FreeBSD an Active Directory Server? From my research and experiementation, I am under the impression that it is possible, but I have yet to come up with any articles where it has actual been done fully. At the minute I have samba and ldap setup, the active directory dns entries in (_ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.{domain}). I am getting an error message when trying to join my XP client to the domain - I think it is to do with the ldap server. Any clues or points in the right direction would be helpful - I am getting the impression that this may be a big project, if it is even achieveable. Cheers, Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 12:58:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE3116A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:58:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dopplecoder@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9FD43D49 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:58:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dopplecoder@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z6so519314nzd for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 05:58:25 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hFN83mFUoFHP4VVvkAfA9oyX43dCssFfIjP+bJQyDAiHlILSxS/2Q0zD/usLMDFO4dWmoVbc2XHY/JQzl4cLMQy5bVHMMXO2z9FrsgvdDTxjfVH6/OmZK/zj7SwqcH39hoN0T+7ubv3pG1nQFqtUXfa1hRCpU9RUjkKjigDBg0s= Received: by 10.36.36.10 with SMTP id j10mr3522036nzj; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 05:58:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.128.17 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 05:58:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <45d750d205073005585ef420b6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:58:24 -0400 From: Aaron Peterson To: gerard-seibert@suscom.net In-Reply-To: <20050730074129.025C.GERARD-SEIBERT@suscom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050730074129.025C.GERARD-SEIBERT@suscom.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Command Not Found error message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Aaron Peterson List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:58:29 -0000 On 7/30/05, Gerard Seibert wrote: > When running 'portsclean' from CRON, this message is sent to the root > mailbox. In fact, there are several of them in the mailbox. I do not > know what it means. >=20 > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgtools.rb:31: command not found: unam= e -rm > uname(1) could be broken - cannot parse the output: > make: not found > ** Error occured reading /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf: > uninitialized constant PkgConfig::OS_PLATFORM >=20 > When I run the 'uname -rm' command from the command line, it produces > this output. >=20 > 5.4-RELEASE I386 > =20 > -- > Gerard E. Seibert > gerard-seibert@suscom.net You might need to define your path in your crontab file with something like this: PATH=3D${PATH}:/usr/bin (because uname is in /usr/bin) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 12:59:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DA716A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:59:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbronson@wixb.com) Received: from cheyenne.wixb.com (cheyenne.wixb.com [65.43.82.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA6643D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:59:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbronson@wixb.com) Received: from coors.wixb.com (coors.wixb.com [10.43.82.5]) by cheyenne.wixb.com (8.13.5.Alpha2/8.13.5.Alpha2) with ESMTP id j6UCxADe004759 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:59:10 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.2.5.1.2.20050730073623.00c12950@wixb.com> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:59:10 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "J.D. Bronson" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: bsdlabel question.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:59:12 -0000 # /dev/da0s1: type: SCSI disk: da0s1 label: flags: bytes/sector: 512 sectors/track: 63 tracks/cylinder: 255 sectors/cylinder: 16065 cylinders: 2234 sectors/unit: 35889147 rpm: 15000 interleave: 1 trackskew: 0 cylinderskew: 0 headswitch: 0 # milliseconds track-to-track seek: 0 # milliseconds drivedata: 0 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 1048576 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 8 b: 2097152 1048576 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 c: 35889147 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit d: 16777216 3145728 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 e: 8388608 19922944 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 f: 2097152 28311552 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 g: 2097152 30408704 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 h: 3383291 32505856 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 ...This is on a FreeBSD 5.4 machine with a Fuji 15K 18GB scsi drive. Does this disklabel look right? (28553 bps/cpg?) thanks! -- J.D. Bronson Information Services Aurora Health Care - Milwaukee, Wisconsin Office: 414.978.8282 // Fax: 414.314.8787 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 13:20:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710C116A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:20:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl) Received: from smtp18.wxs.nl (smtp18.wxs.nl [195.121.6.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063B543D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:20:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl) Received: from smtp.planet.nl (ip51cc8423.speed.planet.nl [81.204.132.35]) by smtp18.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IKF00MF7ZQBU3@smtp18.wxs.nl> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:20:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Alex.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.planet.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6UDKYjJ002995; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:20:34 +0200 Received: (from akruijff@localhost) by Alex.lan (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6UDKXdM002994; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:20:33 +0200 Content-return: prohibited Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:20:33 +0200 From: Alex de Kruijff In-reply-to: <20050730104152.GH17171@ns2.wananchi.com> To: Odhiambo Washington , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20050730132033.GA2911@Alex.lan> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i References: <20050730104152.GH17171@ns2.wananchi.com> X-Authentication-warning: Alex.lan: akruijff set sender to freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl using -f Cc: Subject: Re: Problem with IPFilter/IPNAT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:20:37 -0000 On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 01:41:52PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > I am using IPFilter and IPNat on several FreeBSD boxes. They are mostly > configured the same. > > Each box has two interfaces, public and internal, and acts as a router > to the LAN which is 'behind' it. The LAN machines use the FreeBSD as the > gateway, as well as a DNS server. I run cache-only config. > > The problem I have is that when, for any reason, the public link goes > down, the machines on the LAN timeout when communicating. It sound like there tying to lookup hostnames via DNS or something like this. Are you able to ping them with there ip addresses? Are you able to ping them with there host names? -- Alex Please copy the original recipients, otherwise I may not read your reply. Howto's based on my ppersonal use, including information about setting up a firewall and creating traffic graphs with MRTG http://www.kruijff.org/alex/FreeBSD/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 13:42:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4096316A41F; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:42:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@math.ku.dk) Received: from imf.math.ku.dk (fw.math.ku.dk [130.225.103.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D096643D46; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:42:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@math.ku.dk) Received: from imf.math.ku.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imf.math.ku.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4310211686; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:42:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from shannon.math.ku.dk (shannon.math.ku.dk [130.225.103.12]) by imf.math.ku.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:42:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:42:54 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=C3=B8rgaard?= To: Marc Fonvieille In-Reply-To: <20050730120218.GC596@gothic.blackend.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: scanimage -L doesn't work as normal user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:42:59 -0000 On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 01:41:20PM +0200, Erik N=C3=B8rgaard wrote: > > Wrong perms on ugen0, read carefully: > 7.6.4 Allowing Scanner Access to Other Users > if you want ugen0 appears with the right permissions once you plug your > scanner. The current devfs scheme you use (Cf. your previous mail) > should work if you boot directly with your scanner plugged and not if > you plug it later. According to the man-pages, this should be solved by adding the folowing rules to /etc/devfs.rules: # Allow any user to access uscanner and ugen devices rw add path 'usb0' mode 0666 add path 'ugen*' mode 0666 add path 'uscanner*' mode 0666 I restarted devfs but the devices were created with the wrong permissions when I plugged in the scanner? If I restart devfs after plugging in the scanner permissions are corrected. But I think this is rather annoying - is this intended? no problem report has been filed on this issue... > > $ sane-find-scanner -q > > found USB scanner (UNKNOWN vendor and product) at device /dev/uscanner0 > > found USB scanner (vendor=3D0x04b8 [EPSON], product=3D0x0121 [EPSON Sca= nner]) at > > libusb:/dev/usb0:/dev/ugen0 > > > [...] > > This is a problem, a USB scanner under FreeBSD should use uscanner(8) > driver nothing else. I assume your scanner is not seen by uscanner(8), > i.e. not supported or just not defined in uscanner.c > Try to add an entry for your scanner in uscanner.c, rebuild uscanner.ko, > etc. and retry. OK, I will update usbdevs and uscanner.c and submit a patch if this makes it work. Yet, I still can't understand howcome I can successfully scan an image as root if scanning is only supposed to work with the uscanner device. Thanks, Erik GnuPG: http://www.locolomo.org/home/norgaard/norgaard.gpg.asc pub 1024D/11D11F9E 2003-08-15 Erik Norgaard Key fingerprint =3D C394 81C4 D137 EEE5 39BE 82D5 3E6B FB3E 11D1 1F9E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 14:13:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014B916A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:13:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (blackend.org [212.11.35.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3E443D5C for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:13:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from gothic.blackend.org (gothic.blackend.org [192.168.1.203]) by abigail.blackend.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6UED32s023287; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:13:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@abigail.blackend.org) Received: from gothic.blackend.org (localhost.blackend.org [127.0.0.1]) by gothic.blackend.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6UED3vB001255; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:13:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@gothic.blackend.org) Received: (from marc@localhost) by gothic.blackend.org (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6UED3YU001254; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:13:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:13:03 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille To: Erik =?iso-8859-1?B?TsO4cmdhYXJk?= Message-ID: <20050730141302.GD596@gothic.blackend.org> References: <20050730120218.GC596@gothic.blackend.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Useless-Header: blackend.org X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: scanimage -L doesn't work as normal user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:13:06 -0000 On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 03:42:54PM +0200, Erik Nørgaard wrote: > On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 01:41:20PM +0200, Erik Nørgaard wrote: > > > > Wrong perms on ugen0, read carefully: > > 7.6.4 Allowing Scanner Access to Other Users > > if you want ugen0 appears with the right permissions once you plug your > > scanner. The current devfs scheme you use (Cf. your previous mail) > > should work if you boot directly with your scanner plugged and not if > > you plug it later. > > According to the man-pages, this should be solved by adding the > folowing rules to /etc/devfs.rules: > > # Allow any user to access uscanner and ugen devices rw > add path 'usb0' mode 0666 > add path 'ugen*' mode 0666 > add path 'uscanner*' mode 0666 > you should add a ruleset line before your lines. > I restarted devfs but the devices were created with the wrong > permissions when I plugged in the scanner? > I don't understand the "?" > If I restart devfs after plugging in the scanner permissions are > corrected. But I think this is rather annoying - is this intended? > no problem report has been filed on this issue... [...] I think it's a ruleset issue as I said above. Another thing devfs.rules is for pluggable devices, devfs.conf for devices present at boot time. Marc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 14:36:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44D916A420 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:36:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C613C43D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:36:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.246.232] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A07261EE0148; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:36:34 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6UEbjWQ032446; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:37:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6UEbeKh032445; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:37:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: Nikolas Britton References: From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:37:40 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Nikolas Britton's message of "Sat, 30 Jul 2005 03:26:04 -0500") Message-ID: <4kbr4k9x6z.r4k@mail.opusnet.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD - Questions Subject: Re: Using a hard drive without partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:36:39 -0000 Nikolas Britton writes: > Drive: > Dangerously dedicated > /dev/da0s1 > newfs -O2 -U I think you're using "dangerously dedicated" wrongly. A DD disk is one which has no standard partition table in the MBR; the "disklabel" sectors (16) start at sector 0 (or with your no-secondary-partitions- either method, your filesystem would start there (newfs /dev/da0)). You've got a standard partition table with the s1 entry in use, which is not "dangerous". The FAQ has an entry on DD disks. I can't say much about your main question; I've never heard of doing it. It sounds less "dangerous" than putting a FS in a file, like we do with ISO filesystems all the time. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 14:52:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA17716A453 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:52:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (hobbiton.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614EC43D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:52:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.161.222.227] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1Dyshr-000NQh-6p; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:52:55 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <656DB9CB-8806-4331-B7F0-603F887D7B9F@shire.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:52:54 -0600 To: Nikolas Britton X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.161.222.227 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: FreeBSD - Questions Subject: Re: Using a hard drive without partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:52:56 -0000 On Jul 30, 2005, at 2:26 AM, Nikolas Britton wrote: > What are the ramifications, good or bad, of not using partitions on a > FreeBSD disk?. My understanding is that if you use partitions in a standard way, other operating systems that may be or in the future be on the system in question will not wipe out your FreeBSD installation on the "dangerously dedicated" disk. There is nothing inherent wrong with DD but it is more dangerous if other OSes may be involved. I have used both sorts of layouts and have never had any problems, yet again, my computers were servers that would never have another OS anywhere near them... Chad --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad@shire.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 15:08:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9793E16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:08:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsh.lists@comcast.net) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E7E43D46 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:08:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsh.lists@comcast.net) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (tardiss.hsd1.ma.comcast.net[66.30.82.93]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2005073015084901500591lqe>; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:08:49 +0000 Message-ID: <42EB97FA.1080904@comcast.net> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:08:42 -0400 From: Sean User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050707) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: network info X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rsh.lists@comcast.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:08:50 -0000 What command can display all the network parameters assigned from dhcp, such DNS? I have looked at ifconfig and netstat but unless I missed a switch I do not see them as correct choices. Basically the equiv of ipconfig /all in Windows? Thanks Sean From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 15:28:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3380916A420 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:28:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from banerjee_atanu@yahoo.com) Received: from web53113.mail.yahoo.com (web53113.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.49.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B339143D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:28:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from banerjee_atanu@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 64522 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Jul 2005 15:28:08 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ShwRvnPBrsriT7Ou4KsopKqPtcYD+f65ahcC+TfTuxW1sxIWYAPC5ZJQvdgfDVBHVBPDCldrlmlhhS8aAg3Cwg0kHXiCxBZzbOPhJJP/4MGD4AX/YHAKeEcd0H1OBRJNCqs/jNJqmEj9PWA/6jM9PyiU9WWKNYJYryzMrdn1k4M= ; Message-ID: <20050730152808.64520.qmail@web53113.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [210.214.45.82] by web53113.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:28:08 PDT Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:28:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Atanu Banerjee To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: your data X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:28:09 -0000 questions@freebsd.org wrote:Please confirm the document. ********************************************************** ********************************************************** WARNING: WinProxy has detected a virus in file attached to this e-mail message! The attachment has been automatically removed to protect your network. WinProxy Administrator: kiran@growelsoftech.com 07/31/05 02:35:22 WinProxy (Version 5.1 R1e (5.0.50.11)) - http://www.Ositis.com/ Antivirus Vendor: Panda Software Scan Engine Version: 4.7.0.2_4.1.6.408 Pattern File Version: 3.102014 (Timestamp: 2005/07/29 12:08:44) Machine name: MEMBERSERVER Machine IP address: 192.168.184.1 Server: 67.28.113.19 Client: 192.168.1.67 Protocol: SMTP Virus: "W32/Netsky.P.worm" found! Attachment: data.zip ********************************************************** ********************************************************** __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 15:39:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694E416A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:39:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dhenin@puma.cti.ecp.fr) Received: from leopard.ecp.fr (leopard.ecp.fr [138.195.33.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B4143D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:39:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dhenin@puma.cti.ecp.fr) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leopard.ecp.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7745437C8F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:39:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from leopard.ecp.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (leopard [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15121-01 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:39:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from puma.cti.ecp.fr (puma.cti.ecp.fr [138.195.33.10]) by leopard.ecp.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658E637C8A for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:39:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: by puma.cti.ecp.fr (Postfix, from userid 23550) id BC0A31E190; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:39:22 +0200 (MEST) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:39:22 +0200 From: Jean-Jacques Dhenin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050730153922.GA5593@ecp.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ecp.fr Subject: JNC MP3 Player Synchronize cache failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:39:28 -0000 Hello, I am not able to use may "SylverCrest" mp3 player. When I connect the player I have this message on the console : da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device da0: 1.000MB/s transfers da0: 499MB (1023713 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 499C) umass0: at uhub2 port 1 (addr 2) disconnected (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): lost device (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Synchronize cache failed, status == 0x39, scsi status == 0x0 (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): removing device entry after removing the device and after many minutes a page fault in kernel mode (trap 12) : fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0a27883 ... panic: page fault. This is the same with 4.11, 5.4, 6 and 7 release. I found nothing on the net. Many thanks for a patch, a fix or a workaround. -- (°> Dhénin Jean-Jacques / ) dhenin@ecp.fr ^^ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 00:46:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E4916A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:46:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F86243D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:46:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 21578 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2005 00:46:00 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 30 Jul 2005 00:46:00 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 664A03F; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:45:59 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 29 Jul 2005 20:45:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <44br4l5dfc.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 7 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:34:41 +0000 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Glenn Dawson , BlackBsd@Mountain.net Subject: Re: Is Kern/Pr 58045 really fixed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:46:01 -0000 "Ted Mittelstaedt" writes: > One reason bugs get closed is that the submitters don't respond > to requests from the developers for further info. A status of > closed should not be interpreted to mean any bug was corrected. In this case, it *does* mean that the patch from the PR was committed. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 16:34:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A0816A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:34:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0984843D4C for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:34:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fields.fields.utoronto.ca (fields.localdomain [192.168.216.11]) by fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields 6.0) with ESMTP id j6UGYCNV003079 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:34:12 -0400 Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (fields.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.11]) by fields.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields WS 6.0) with ESMTP id j6UGYB6P000897; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:34:12 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7A0CF511F8; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:34:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:34:05 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Subhro Message-ID: <20050730163405.GD92391@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050728194329.GB12017@xor.obsecurity.org> <42EB4022.1070502@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42EB4022.1070502@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:35:15 +0000 Cc: FreeBSD - Questions , Nikolas Britton , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:34:13 -0000 --BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 02:23:54PM +0530, Subhro wrote: > -O2 is known to create broken binaries. Reduce it to -O and recompile.=20 > Report back if it still does not work. No, only on 4.x and below. Kris --BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC66v9Wry0BWjoQKURAmKiAJ9ho8cjazmNd1FHZi7/kOcOegjrBQCghCkj S7dyynOHBUCnHxR4XLGDstE= =/kBL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 16:55:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9779316A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:55:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D0243D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:55:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6UGtkm6029002 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:55:47 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050730094948.12a1cd50@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:51:55 -0700 To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" , Chatchawan Wongsiriprasert From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <9D57A8CD-C930-4881-84BF-E98089761FAE@shire.net> References: <52771.58.136.66.157.1122701141.squirrel@secure.abatravel.net> <9D57A8CD-C930-4881-84BF-E98089761FAE@shire.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Acess 127.0.0.1 from FreeBSD jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:55:48 -0000 At 10:35 PM 7/29/2005, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: >On Jul 29, 2005, at 11:25 PM, Chatchawan Wongsiriprasert wrote: > >>Hi, >> I am now using chroot apache+php, and want to move to more secure >>FreeBSD jail. >> >> After read the FreeBSD handbook, I have been successfully created a >>jailed apache+php on my test server but there is a litle problem that >>need to be solved before I put it on my real server. >> >> I run mysql-server on this server and make it listen only to >>127.0.0.1 >>(--bind-address option). How can I access mysql-server on this server >>from the jail without >> (1) make mysql-server listen to the real ip (I don't want to open >>another door to my server -- firewall can be employ but this add >>another complexity to my setup) > >Create a separate jail on the system and put mysql in that. Make the >address of this mysql jail be 192.168.1.1 or something like that. >The apache jail will be able to reach it but the outside won't. > >You should still have a firewall of some sort. > >> or >> (2) using unix socket (a lot of code to change and test -- most >>are >>develop by another people). > >Using the socket option is better as it probably also performs better >(I don't know this for sure -- am just guessing) Using the sockets in mysql is faster. The only code you should need to change is the code that open's the connection to the database, everything else will work just fine. -Glenn >Chad > >> >> >>Regards, >>Chatchawan Wongsiriprasert >> >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >--- >Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC >Your Web App and Email hosting provider >chad@shire.net > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 16:58:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3719B16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:58:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21A743D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:58:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fields.fields.utoronto.ca (fields.localdomain [192.168.216.11]) by fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields 6.0) with ESMTP id j6UGwXNV005315 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:58:34 -0400 Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (fields.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.11]) by fields.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields WS 6.0) with ESMTP id j6UGwX6P002072; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:58:33 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 09D335121C; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:58:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:58:26 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: "J.D. Bronson" Message-ID: <20050730165826.GA83896@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <6.2.5.1.2.20050730063719.00bdf968@wixb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.1.2.20050730063719.00bdf968@wixb.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openssl 0.9.8 with 5.4-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:58:35 -0000 --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 06:38:18AM -0500, J.D. Bronson wrote: > I know this may not be supported, but I was wondering if anyone was=20 > successful in installing the src of openssl 0.9.8 into the base=20 > install of 5.4 (overwriting the originals) ? Use the port, which has such a knob. Kris --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC67GyWry0BWjoQKURAppCAKDuIbjgTpPMyCJKEO+hO5phHvoLYwCdGqcP jTuMciXKopa/RTDqQ15srLw= =LFRe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 17:00:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA1E16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:00:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C9343D46 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:59:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6UGxwaW029130 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:59:59 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050730095447.129d5570@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:56:07 -0700 To: "J.D. Bronson" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.1.2.20050730073623.00c12950@wixb.com> References: <6.2.5.1.2.20050730073623.00c12950@wixb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: bsdlabel question.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:00:00 -0000 At 05:59 AM 7/30/2005, J.D. Bronson wrote: ># /dev/da0s1: >type: SCSI >disk: da0s1 >label: >flags: >bytes/sector: 512 >sectors/track: 63 >tracks/cylinder: 255 >sectors/cylinder: 16065 >cylinders: 2234 >sectors/unit: 35889147 >rpm: 15000 >interleave: 1 >trackskew: 0 >cylinderskew: 0 >headswitch: 0 # milliseconds >track-to-track seek: 0 # milliseconds >drivedata: 0 > >8 partitions: ># size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > a: 1048576 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 8 > b: 2097152 1048576 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > c: 35889147 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, > don't edit > d: 16777216 3145728 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > e: 8388608 19922944 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > f: 2097152 28311552 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > g: 2097152 30408704 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > h: 3383291 32505856 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > > >...This is on a FreeBSD 5.4 machine with a Fuji 15K 18GB scsi drive. > >Does this disklabel look right? (28553 bps/cpg?) Yes, it's correct. The number that's liset in the bps/cpg column is not what it appears to be when you create a filesystem using newfs in 5.x. If I recall correctly, it's actually the number of frags in a cyliner group. -Glenn >thanks! > > > > >-- >J.D. Bronson >Information Services >Aurora Health Care - Milwaukee, Wisconsin >Office: 414.978.8282 // Fax: 414.314.8787 > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 17:04:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AAB16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:04:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C652743D46 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:04:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6UH4GqY029243 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:04:16 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050730095840.13b30e40@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:00:24 -0700 To: rsh.lists@comcast.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <42EB97FA.1080904@comcast.net> References: <42EB97FA.1080904@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: network info X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:04:18 -0000 At 08:08 AM 7/30/2005, Sean wrote: >What command can display all the network parameters assigned from dhcp, >such DNS? >I have looked at ifconfig and netstat but unless I missed a switch I do >not see them as correct choices. Not exactly one command, but you could do ifconfig && cat /etc/resolv.conf If it's something you need to do frequently, you could make an alias for it, or a shell script. -Glenn >Basically the equiv of ipconfig /all in Windows? > > Thanks > Sean >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 17:09:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E068A16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:09:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804A843D48 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:09:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89FB60D7; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:09:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24517-03; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:09:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [216.201.118.138] (racerx.makeworld.com [216.201.118.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D02860D4; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:09:14 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <42EBB43B.1080108@makeworld.com> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:09:15 -0500 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (X11/20050715) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glenn Dawson References: <42EB97FA.1080904@comcast.net> <6.1.0.6.2.20050730095840.13b30e40@cobalt.antimatter.net> In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20050730095840.13b30e40@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 OpenPGP: id=C01BC363 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.2 (20050629) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic Cc: rsh.lists@comcast.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: network info X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:09:22 -0000 Glenn Dawson wrote: > At 08:08 AM 7/30/2005, Sean wrote: > >> What command can display all the network parameters assigned from >> dhcp, such DNS? >> I have looked at ifconfig and netstat but unless I missed a switch I >> do not see them as correct choices. > > > Not exactly one command, but you could do > > ifconfig && cat /etc/resolv.conf Toss an extra && sockstat -4 for even more info. > > If it's something you need to do frequently, you could make an alias for > it, or a shell script. > > -Glenn > > >> Basically the equiv of ipconfig /all in Windows? >> >> Thanks >> Sean -- Best regards, Chris History repeats itself. that's one of the things wrong with history. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 17:12:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B973F16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:12:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E70943D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:12:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-27-86-22.san.res.rr.com [66.27.86.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6UHBxSo029405 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:11:59 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20050730100508.13b4b060@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:08:07 -0700 To: "J.D. Bronson" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.1.2.20050730073623.00c12950@wixb.com> References: <6.2.5.1.2.20050730073623.00c12950@wixb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: bsdlabel question.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:12:00 -0000 At 05:59 AM 7/30/2005, J.D. Bronson wrote: ># /dev/da0s1: >type: SCSI >disk: da0s1 >label: >flags: >bytes/sector: 512 >sectors/track: 63 >tracks/cylinder: 255 >sectors/cylinder: 16065 >cylinders: 2234 >sectors/unit: 35889147 >rpm: 15000 >interleave: 1 >trackskew: 0 >cylinderskew: 0 >headswitch: 0 # milliseconds >track-to-track seek: 0 # milliseconds >drivedata: 0 > >8 partitions: ># size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > a: 1048576 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 8 > b: 2097152 1048576 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > c: 35889147 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, > don't edit > d: 16777216 3145728 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > e: 8388608 19922944 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > f: 2097152 28311552 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > g: 2097152 30408704 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > h: 3383291 32505856 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > > >...This is on a FreeBSD 5.4 machine with a Fuji 15K 18GB scsi drive. > >Does this disklabel look right? (28553 bps/cpg?) I just checked the source for newfs, and my previous reply was correct. Here's the relevant code that put's that number in the label: if (pp != NULL) { pp->p_fstype = FS_BSDFFS; pp->p_fsize = sblock.fs_fsize; pp->p_frag = sblock.fs_frag; pp->p_cpg = sblock.fs_fpg; } The last line is the one that inserts that number. sblock.fs_fpg is the number of frags per cylinder grounp. -Glenn >thanks! > > > > >-- >J.D. Bronson >Information Services >Aurora Health Care - Milwaukee, Wisconsin >Office: 414.978.8282 // Fax: 414.314.8787 > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 17:38:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB21116A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:38:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D50A43D49 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:38:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so792948wra for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:38:57 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FUPGvXmRY/PERKzd9Qytz+AnxDU/WB1zgLitQuBVLAIuCMc5ktFFkyZ4B+XrTmOWXFK3qE8Z3WFiZEZsrdHkMoXz5YJwkCfeN98SzveUyqlX2aegKnXSZuBllqh/90e60S+j/IvhnANwcU9dzNGMDuB4ITeMsHc85/FfYDDYgA0= Received: by 10.54.45.14 with SMTP id s14mr1966027wrs; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:38:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:38:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:38:57 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" In-Reply-To: <656DB9CB-8806-4331-B7F0-603F887D7B9F@shire.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <656DB9CB-8806-4331-B7F0-603F887D7B9F@shire.net> Cc: FreeBSD - Questions Subject: Re: Using a hard drive without partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:38:58 -0000 On 7/30/05, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: >=20 > On Jul 30, 2005, at 2:26 AM, Nikolas Britton wrote: >=20 > > What are the ramifications, good or bad, of not using partitions on a > > FreeBSD disk?. >=20 > My understanding is that if you use partitions in a standard way, > other operating systems that may be or in the future be on the system > in question will not wipe out your FreeBSD installation on the Don't you mean slice? In BSD land slice =3D IBM PC partition and partitions, in BSD, are divisions of a slice. Yes it's confusing.... > "dangerously dedicated" disk. There is nothing inherent wrong with > DD but it is more dangerous if other OSes may be involved. I have > used both sorts of layouts and have never had any problems, yet > again, my computers were servers that would never have another OS > anywhere near them... Correct about DD... This array will NEVER be used with another OS and It will NEVER be booted from.... The disk array will never show it's self in DOS because it needs special drivers. In FreeBSD I want it to show up as one big disk and just mount it as /data or something to that effect. The equivalent in MS-DOS / PC World to what I want to do is make a primary partition that spans the whole drive. In BSD land this would be da0s1c.... but from what I've read the c partition (BSD partition) is reserved and can't be used. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 17:46:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C13216A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:46:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbronson@wixb.com) Received: from cheyenne.wixb.com (cheyenne.wixb.com [65.43.82.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E58643D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:46:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbronson@wixb.com) Received: from coors.wixb.com (coors.wixb.com [10.43.82.5]) by cheyenne.wixb.com (8.13.5.Alpha2/8.13.5.Alpha2) with ESMTP id j6UHkb2m005341 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:46:37 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.2.5.1.2.20050730124420.00c0a808@wixb.com> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:46:37 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "J.D. Bronson" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: correct syntax for openssl 0.9.8 in port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:46:38 -0000 I update my port tree on 5.4 to the latest and I am trying to figure out what steps I need to build openssl 0.9.8 in /usr/ports/security/openssl and end up overwriting any base files. This question comes up often, perhaps a comment can be put into the makefile? I have tried all the ideas on the archives and either it wont build or it keeps trying to build 0.9.7g !!! *ANY* advice will be greatly appreciated. I am able to compile the src code cleanly, but that install will place files in their own spot and obviously not overwrite base files. thanks! -- J.D. Bronson Information Services Aurora Health Care - Milwaukee, Wisconsin Office: 414.978.8282 // Fax: 414.314.8787 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 17:50:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D3516A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:50:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: from kweetal.tue.nl (kweetal.tue.nl [131.155.3.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2D343D46 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:50:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kweetal.tue.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A869013B675; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:50:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kweetal.tue.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kweetal.tue.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62795-02; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:50:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72]) by kweetal.tue.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9CA13B83B; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:50:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from stijn@localhost) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6UHoLKa023853; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:50:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stijn) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:50:21 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop To: Nikolas Britton Message-ID: <20050730175021.GH70957@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Stijn Hoop , Nikolas Britton , "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" , FreeBSD - Questions References: <656DB9CB-8806-4331-B7F0-603F887D7B9F@shire.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J/dobhs11T7y2rNN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Bright-Idea: Let's abolish HTML mail! X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tue.nl Cc: FreeBSD - Questions , "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Subject: Re: Using a hard drive without partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:50:24 -0000 --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 12:38:57PM -0500, Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 7/30/05, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > > On Jul 30, 2005, at 2:26 AM, Nikolas Britton wrote: > > > What are the ramifications, good or bad, of not using partitions on a > > > FreeBSD disk?. As far as my understanding goes, it is an artifact of ye olde days, and should not be used again. There are ramifications for 'tasting' the label on the disk etc, however I do not know what the impact is -- it might just work, or it might not. > This array will NEVER be used with another OS and > It will NEVER be booted from.... The disk array will never show it's > self in DOS because it needs special drivers. In FreeBSD I want it to > show up as one big disk and just mount it as /data or something to > that effect. >=20 > The equivalent in MS-DOS / PC World to what I want to do is make a > primary partition that spans the whole drive. In BSD land this would > be da0s1c.... but from what I've read the c partition (BSD partition) > is reserved and can't be used. So just create one primary slice using fdisk, and then label the disk with disklabel -e and copy & paste the 'c' line to an 'a' line. Then use da0s1a for newfs & mount. The amount of space wasted is negligible nowadays (~10mb or so I guess) and it may just save you in the future if/when support for DD mode goes away (not that I know it will, but you never know...). HTH, --Stijn --=20 Apparently, 1 in 5 people in the world are Chinese. And there are 5 people in my family, so it must be one of them. It's either my mum or my dad...... or maybe my older brother John. Or my younger brother Ho-Cha-Chu. But I'm pretty sure it's John. --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC673dY3r/tLQmfWcRAnviAJ44sQDl5zCzvD7vHu+JqhOhhos1NgCeOuLQ e5feUwJX16rfL9ZHhguNt1Y= =+pp6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 17:51:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091A416A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:51:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cdelsey@qwest.net) Received: from mpls-qmqp-02.inet.qwest.net (mpls-qmqp-02.inet.qwest.net [63.231.195.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E517C43D5F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:51:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cdelsey@qwest.net) Received: (qmail 54829 invoked by uid 0); 30 Jul 2005 17:46:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (63.231.195.12) by mpls-qmqp-02.inet.qwest.net with QMQP; 30 Jul 2005 17:46:10 -0000 Received: from vdsl-130-13-181-49.phnx.qwest.net (HELO ?192.168.2.2?) (130.13.181.49) by mpls-pop-12.inet.qwest.net with SMTP; 30 Jul 2005 17:51:07 -0000 Received: by localhost.local (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 369914561; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:51:07 -0700 (MST) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:51:07 -0700 Message-ID: <20050730175107.GA59929@localhost.local> From: "Carl Delsey" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050730055013.GA57362@localhost.local> <20050730062425.GK75379@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050730062425.GK75379@wantadilla.lemis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: Growisofs seg faults with DVD-RAM. Anybody else seen this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:51:14 -0000 On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 03:54:25PM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Friday, 29 July 2005 at 22:50:13 -0700, Carl Delsey wrote: > > I'm wondering if anybody else has seen this problem, and if you've > > found some other workaround for it? Or alternatively, you still have > > the problem and my patch would be useful to you. :-) > > Is this a workaround or a fix? The latter is obviously preferable. > Also, does this only affect FreeBSD, or is it general? In the former > case, contact the maintainer (mail address in the Makefile); in the > latter, contact the project. It's a fix ... just not as elegant as I would like. Looking through the code some more, it looks like it's a general problem. I'll try to get ahold of the maintainer and get this fixed in the distribution. In the meantime, if anybody needs a solution now, I'm including the patch here. --- growisofs.c Tue Aug 24 16:02:29 2004 +++ growisofs.c Sat Jul 30 10:35:45 2005 @@ -2043,7 +2044,9 @@ fcntl ((fd),F_SETFD,f|FD_CLOEXEC); } while (0) CLOSEONEXEC(in_fd); CLOSEONEXEC(out_fd); - CLOSEONEXEC(ioctl_fd); + if ((ioctl_handle) && (ioctl_handle != INVALID_HANDLE)) /*the fd might already have been closed*/ + { CLOSEONEXEC(ioctl_fd); + } #undef CLOSEONEXEC if (!dry_run && (poor_man || next_session==0)) /* unmount media */ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 17:51:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D09616A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:51:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dlavigne6@sympatico.ca) Received: from tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts20.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B18543D62 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:51:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dlavigne6@sympatico.ca) Received: from [192.168.2.97] ([70.48.185.42]) by tomts40-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20050730171723.EOYQ1799.tomts40-srv.bellnexxia.net@[192.168.2.97]> for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:17:23 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:17:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Dru X-X-Sender: dlavigne6@dru.domain.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050730125158.V542@dru.domain.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: any backup utilities for ACLs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:51:29 -0000 I've enabled ACL support on a 5.4-RELEASE system and have no problems creating and modifying ACLs. However, I can't seem to find a backup program that will actually restore the ACLs. I've tried bsdtar, pax, and star. Has anyone had any success in backing up and restoring ACLs? If so, what was the magic incantation? Dru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 17:54:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD1816A41F; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:54:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@math.ku.dk) Received: from imf.math.ku.dk (fw.math.ku.dk [130.225.103.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31FB43D46; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:54:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@math.ku.dk) Received: from imf.math.ku.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imf.math.ku.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 896D71B245; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:54:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from shannon.math.ku.dk (shannon.math.ku.dk [130.225.103.12]) by imf.math.ku.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:54:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:54:36 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=C3=B8rgaard?= To: Marc Fonvieille In-Reply-To: <20050730141302.GD596@gothic.blackend.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: SOLVED: scanimage -L doesn't work as normal user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:54:44 -0000 Hi, OK, I have solved the problem, as was originally assumed it boils down to getting the permissions right. To make Epson 2480 work, there is no need to patch the uscanner.c or usbdevs files and rebuild that module. I did make that work though - sort of, now, sane-find-scanner finds an unidentified device on uscanner0, but scanimage correctly idenfies the scanner. This is what to do: In /usr/src/sys/dev/usb edit the files usbdevs and uscanner.c, in usbdevs add a line: product EPSON 2480 0x0121 Perfection 2480 scanner and in uscanner.c add the line {{ USB_VENDOR_EPSON, USB_PRODUCT_EPSON_2480 }, 0 }, after the last EPSON scanner. I don't know if there is any benefit from using the uscanner device other than the ability to set permissions for the scanner only. Here's the trick: Create a file /etc/devfs.rules with the following: [devfsrules=10] # Allow any user to access usb devices: uscanner and ugen add path 'usb0' mode 0666 add path 'usb1' mode 0666 add path 'ugen*' mode 0666 add path 'uscanner*' mode 0666 The last line can be omitted if you don't use the uscanner device. I think it is better to let "others" access rw the scanner device than to add users to the operator group. Alternatively, one can create a separate group eg "scanner", then append "group scanner" to each rule - this might be the best instead of giving rw access to arbitrary ugen devices. In /etc/rc.conf add the line: devfs_system_ruleset="devfsrules" Then restart devfs. You can unplug and plugin the scanner as much as you like. Cheers, Erik GnuPG: http://www.locolomo.org/home/norgaard/norgaard.gpg.asc pub 1024D/11D11F9E 2003-08-15 Erik Norgaard Key fingerprint = C394 81C4 D137 EEE5 39BE 82D5 3E6B FB3E 11D1 1F9E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 17:58:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44E816A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:58:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489A643D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:58:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fields.fields.utoronto.ca (fields.localdomain [192.168.216.11]) by fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields 6.0) with ESMTP id j6UHw1NV010756 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:58:01 -0400 Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (fields.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.11]) by fields.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields WS 6.0) with ESMTP id j6UHw06P005061; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:58:01 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 45FE45128C; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:57:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:57:54 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: "J.D. Bronson" Message-ID: <20050730175754.GA434@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <6.2.5.1.2.20050730124420.00c0a808@wixb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.1.2.20050730124420.00c0a808@wixb.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: correct syntax for openssl 0.9.8 in port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:58:02 -0000 --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 12:46:37PM -0500, J.D. Bronson wrote: > I update my port tree on 5.4 to the latest and I am trying to figure=20 > out what steps I need to build openssl 0.9.8 in /usr/ports/security/opens= sl > and end up overwriting any base files. >=20 > This question comes up often, perhaps a comment can be put into the=20 > makefile? >=20 > I have tried all the ideas on the archives and either it wont build=20 > or it keeps trying to build 0.9.7g !!! >=20 > *ANY* advice will be greatly appreciated. >=20 > I am able to compile the src code cleanly, but that install will=20 > place files in their own spot and obviously not overwrite base files. Read the makefile for the appropriate variables to set. Kris --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC67+iWry0BWjoQKURApRTAKCvr0knUQqQ35bH9dLazi89RsLLgACfalTK icrNQ0fZY7H7ItcQA6hfkBA= =RMXV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 17:58:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84ADF16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:58:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCA543D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:58:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so794499wra for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:58:24 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Vk61be6NpQn6C4GbIWgIYPxd0pV1c161RHue7L1RiXz0zTMAn91HyIucFJLtkAC92zVJ7v4cA1W/VXRnIE3hfACFVRbxs8T5oQ4FJIUEPf9/wHiq5/VI+gpDts3Fdyq8qxuVucoGFlNEzm4Dry4gAgV0Cuk9DB45rdR2JJar5UI= Received: by 10.54.47.69 with SMTP id u69mr1959144wru; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:58:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:58:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:58:24 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: "Gary W. Swearingen" In-Reply-To: <4kbr4k9x6z.r4k@mail.opusnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4kbr4k9x6z.r4k@mail.opusnet.com> Cc: FreeBSD - Questions Subject: Re: Using a hard drive without partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:58:26 -0000 On 7/30/05, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: > Nikolas Britton writes: >=20 > > Drive: > > Dangerously dedicated > > /dev/da0s1 > > newfs -O2 -U >=20 > I think you're using "dangerously dedicated" wrongly. A DD disk is one > which has no standard partition table in the MBR; the "disklabel" > sectors (16) start at sector 0 (or with your no-secondary-partitions- > either method, your filesystem would start there (newfs /dev/da0)). >=20 But in FreeBSD your disk needs a slice otherwise it's not compatable with fdisk / bsdlabel / growfs... I think. > You've got a standard partition table with the s1 entry in use, which > is not "dangerous". The FAQ has an entry on DD disks. But it is "dangerous" because it starts at sector 0. I've read that FAQ as well as greg's book, Lucas's book, unix power tools, the man pages, handbook, etc. I will reread them again. >=20 > I can't say much about your main question; I've never heard of doing > it. It sounds less "dangerous" than putting a FS in a file, like > we do with ISO filesystems all the time. >=20 Yea that's the problem ;-)..... I've never heard of doing it like that too but it does work. I'm going to be working on this server today and I'll post some of the details of fdisk, bsdlabel, etc. to see if I can help clarify things. Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 18:03:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F9E16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:03:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbronson@wixb.com) Received: from cheyenne.wixb.com (cheyenne.wixb.com [65.43.82.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23DCE43D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:03:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbronson@wixb.com) Received: from coors.wixb.com (coors.wixb.com [10.43.82.5]) by cheyenne.wixb.com (8.13.5.Alpha2/8.13.5.Alpha2) with ESMTP id j6UI3vQH019145; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:03:57 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.2.5.1.2.20050730130259.00c12518@wixb.com> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:03:57 -0500 To: Kris Kennaway From: "J.D. Bronson" In-Reply-To: <20050730175754.GA434@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <6.2.5.1.2.20050730124420.00c0a808@wixb.com> <20050730175754.GA434@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: correct syntax for openssl 0.9.8 in port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:03:58 -0000 At 12:57 PM 7/30/2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 12:46:37PM -0500, J.D. Bronson wrote: > > I update my port tree on 5.4 to the latest and I am trying to figure > > out what steps I need to build openssl 0.9.8 in /usr/ports/security/openssl > > and end up overwriting any base files. > > > > This question comes up often, perhaps a comment can be put into the > > makefile? > > > > I have tried all the ideas on the archives and either it wont build > > or it keeps trying to build 0.9.7g !!! > > > > *ANY* advice will be greatly appreciated. > > > > I am able to compile the src code cleanly, but that install will > > place files in their own spot and obviously not overwrite base files. > >Read the makefile for the appropriate variables to set. > >Kris This is obviously my issue. I cannot figure out what variables to set. What I think it should be, it whines about. Can someone at least POST what we should use so this will at least be in the archives once and for all? thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -- J.D. Bronson Information Services Aurora Health Care - Milwaukee, Wisconsin Office: 414.978.8282 // Fax: 414.314.8787 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 18:16:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3102A16A41F; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:16:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chuck@pkix.net) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B6643D46; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:16:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chuck@pkix.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB8A5E97; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:16:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79492-01; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:16:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-54-113.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.54.113]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E395C54; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:16:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42EBC3F1.5040501@pkix.net> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:16:17 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050716 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey References: <20050730055013.GA57362@localhost.local> <20050730062425.GK75379@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <20050730062425.GK75379@wantadilla.lemis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: cdelsey@qwest.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Growisofs seg faults with DVD-RAM. Anybody else seen this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:16:20 -0000 Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Friday, 29 July 2005 at 22:50:13 -0700, Carl Delsey wrote: >> I was trying to use growisofs to write to a DVD-RAM and it kept >> seg faulting. It worked fine with a DVD-R. >> >> I tracked the problem down to place in the code where growisofs >> tries to perform an operation on a file handle it has already >> closed. >> >>I've implemented a workaround already. The problem is, that by my >>reckoning, this should affect anybody who is trying to use a DVD-RAM >>(not DVD+RW) with FreeBSD, but I haven't found any references to the >>problem on the net. > > My guess is that DVD-RAM isn't popular enough, and that people who > have had problems with it haven't had the understanding to track the > bug down. dvd+rw-tools doesn't support -RAM as well as other formats, in part because the {+,-}R(W) formats are much more common, in part because there are some pretty serious quirks in the older drives, but improvements would be welcome. >> I'm wondering if anybody else has seen this problem, and if you've >> found some other workaround for it? Or alternatively, you still have >> the problem and my patch would be useful to you. :-) > > Is this a workaround or a fix? The latter is obviously preferable. > Also, does this only affect FreeBSD, or is it general? In the former > case, contact the maintainer (mail address in the Makefile); in the > latter, contact the project. I'd be happy to review or test them first if you'd like, but any changes of this sort really ought to go upstream to Andy Polyakov or to the cdwrite mailing list at . -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 18:17:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6957E16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:17:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc14.comcast.net [216.148.227.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8FD43D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:17:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.218] (c-24-1-232-64.hsd1.tx.comcast.net[24.1.232.64]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with ESMTP id <2005073018170201400h1lose>; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:17:03 +0000 Message-ID: <42EBC41E.4070102@computer.org> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:17:02 -0500 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050721) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sam Leffler , FreeBSD Questions References: <42EAD325.60707@errno.com> <42EAD80C.9060707@errno.com> In-Reply-To: <42EAD80C.9060707@errno.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: dhclient and wpa_supplicant X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:17:04 -0000 Sam Leffler wrote: > Sam Leffler wrote: > >> Brooks fixed a bunch of bugs in dhclient and I just committed an >> important fix to wpa_supplicant to work right when wireless cards are >> ejected (previously it would loop). >> >> I also tested that dhclient does the right thing for roaming between >> ap's--switching causes dhclient to immediately collect a new lease. >> >> I just ran tests with wpa_supplicant and found that it does appear to >> handle open ap's properly. >> >> Everything except the wpa_supplicant changes have been MFC'd to >> RELENG_6 for the 6.0RC2 build that's going to happen soon (I'm hoping >> to get re to approve the wpa_supplicant changes). > > > FWIW I just MFC'd the wpa_supplicant fix. > >> >> So the question is what are the outstanding issues with dhclient and >> wpa_supplicant? I'm mostly concerned with wireless devices but feel >> free to talk about wired interfaces too. If something doesn't work >> right please try to give steps to reproduce the problem. Otherwise >> please provide detailed info include ifconfig output. Remember that >> dhclient logs info to /var/log/messages and you should also see link >> state change msgs there too. > > > s/6.0RC2/6.0BETA2/. > > Sam > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Hello, I am very interested in getting wpa_supplicant & dhclient to work. Presently it does not work for me the way I would hope it would. I would think that if it were setup properly on my machine I could turn the machine on at home, and have it associate with my AP and then acquire a lease. Then I could shut it down... go to the office... turn it on and then have it associate with the AP there and acquire a lease. However it does not seem to do this. It seems to only want to associate with the last AP it ever associated with. I then have to down the interface and manually ifconfig it. I am fairly sure I do not have things setup properly, since others have had much better results. Can you please point me to the most current docs or a "How To" to push me in the right direction. I have RELENG_6 as of last night. I have appended some conf files to the bottom for your review. Thanks, rc.conf contains =========================== network_interfaces="lo0 bfe0 ath0" ifconfig_ath0="WPA DHCP" ifconfig_bfe0="DHCP" dhclient.conf contains =========================== interface "ath0" { #send option host-name "myhost"; #send option domain-name "nxdomain.org"; send dhcp-client-identifier "myhost"; media ### Home "ssid mode 11b channel 11 wepmode on weptxkey 1 wepkey 0x", ### Office "ssid "; request subnet-mask, broadcast-address, routers, domain-name-servers, domain-name; } wpa_supplicant.conf ============================= ctrl_interface=/var/run/wpa_supplicant ctrl_interface_group=wheel # Home Network network={ ssid="" scan_ssid=1 key_mgmt=NONE wep_tx_keyidx=0 wep_key0="" } # Office Network network={ ssid="" scan_ssid=1 key_mgmt=NONE wep_tx_keyidx=0 wep_key0="" } -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 18:22:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 321A416A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:22:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cdelsey@qwest.net) Received: from mpls-qmqp-04.inet.qwest.net (mpls-qmqp-04.inet.qwest.net [63.231.195.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A731B43D46 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:22:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cdelsey@qwest.net) Received: (qmail 15102 invoked by uid 0); 30 Jul 2005 18:20:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (63.231.195.4) by mpls-qmqp-04.inet.qwest.net with QMQP; 30 Jul 2005 18:20:14 -0000 Received: from vdsl-130-13-181-49.phnx.qwest.net (HELO ?192.168.2.2?) (130.13.181.49) by mpls-pop-04.inet.qwest.net with SMTP; 30 Jul 2005 18:22:31 -0000 Received: by localhost.local (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 639494563; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:22:31 -0700 (MST) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:22:31 -0700 Message-ID: <20050730182231.GB60016@localhost.local> From: "Carl Delsey" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050730055013.GA57362@localhost.local> <20050730062425.GK75379@wantadilla.lemis.com> <42EBC3F1.5040501@pkix.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42EBC3F1.5040501@pkix.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: Growisofs seg faults with DVD-RAM. Anybody else seen this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:22:33 -0000 On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 02:16:17PM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote: > I'd be happy to review or test them first if you'd like, but any changes of > this sort really ought to go upstream to Andy Polyakov > or to the cdwrite mailing list at > . Thanks. I've just emailed Andy about this. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 18:30:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120D016A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:30:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [66.127.85.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70B443D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:30:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from [66.127.85.93] ([66.127.85.93]) (authenticated bits=0) by ebb.errno.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j6UIUmms093596 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:30:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Message-ID: <42EBC77F.1010601@errno.com> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:31:27 -0700 From: Sam Leffler Organization: Errno Consulting User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Schuele References: <42EAD325.60707@errno.com> <42EAD80C.9060707@errno.com> <42EBC41E.4070102@computer.org> In-Reply-To: <42EBC41E.4070102@computer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: dhclient and wpa_supplicant X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:30:51 -0000 Eric Schuele wrote: > Sam Leffler wrote: > >> Sam Leffler wrote: >> >>> Brooks fixed a bunch of bugs in dhclient and I just committed an >>> important fix to wpa_supplicant to work right when wireless cards are >>> ejected (previously it would loop). >>> >>> I also tested that dhclient does the right thing for roaming between >>> ap's--switching causes dhclient to immediately collect a new lease. >>> >>> I just ran tests with wpa_supplicant and found that it does appear to >>> handle open ap's properly. >>> >>> Everything except the wpa_supplicant changes have been MFC'd to >>> RELENG_6 for the 6.0RC2 build that's going to happen soon (I'm hoping >>> to get re to approve the wpa_supplicant changes). >> >> >> >> FWIW I just MFC'd the wpa_supplicant fix. >> >>> >>> So the question is what are the outstanding issues with dhclient and >>> wpa_supplicant? I'm mostly concerned with wireless devices but feel >>> free to talk about wired interfaces too. If something doesn't work >>> right please try to give steps to reproduce the problem. Otherwise >>> please provide detailed info include ifconfig output. Remember that >>> dhclient logs info to /var/log/messages and you should also see link >>> state change msgs there too. >> >> >> >> s/6.0RC2/6.0BETA2/. >> >> Sam >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > Hello, > > I am very interested in getting wpa_supplicant & dhclient to work. > Presently it does not work for me the way I would hope it would. > > I would think that if it were setup properly on my machine I could turn > the machine on at home, and have it associate with my AP and then > acquire a lease. Then I could shut it down... go to the office... turn > it on and then have it associate with the AP there and acquire a lease. > > However it does not seem to do this. It seems to only want to associate > with the last AP it ever associated with. I then have to down the > interface and manually ifconfig it. > > I am fairly sure I do not have things setup properly, since others have > had much better results. Can you please point me to the most current > docs or a "How To" to push me in the right direction. > > I have RELENG_6 as of last night. I have appended some conf files to > the bottom for your review. > > Thanks, > > rc.conf contains > =========================== > network_interfaces="lo0 bfe0 ath0" > ifconfig_ath0="WPA DHCP" > ifconfig_bfe0="DHCP" > > dhclient.conf contains > =========================== > interface "ath0" { > #send option host-name "myhost"; > #send option domain-name "nxdomain.org"; > send dhcp-client-identifier "myhost"; > > media > ### Home > "ssid mode 11b channel 11 wepmode on weptxkey 1 wepkey > 0x", > ### Office > "ssid 0x"; > > request subnet-mask, broadcast-address, routers, domain-name-servers, > domain-name; > } Do not use media statements to setup wireless parameters; this does not work. You need to run wpa_supplicant and let it identify the network and setup the key parameters. > > wpa_supplicant.conf > ============================= > ctrl_interface=/var/run/wpa_supplicant > ctrl_interface_group=wheel > > # Home Network > network={ > ssid="" > scan_ssid=1 > key_mgmt=NONE > wep_tx_keyidx=0 > wep_key0="" > } > > # Office Network > network={ > ssid="" > scan_ssid=1 > key_mgmt=NONE > wep_tx_keyidx=0 > wep_key0="" > } > Not sure you need scan_ssid set, I'd leave it out. If you have problems try disabling auto-startup of ath0 and run wpa_supplicant by hand with the -d flag to see what it's doing. Once that's going then enable startup in rc.conf. If you continue to have problems provide the output wpa_supplicant -d -i ath0 -c /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf (or similar) when you have trouble. There is also a pending issue with locating some ap's that are setup to hide their ssid. If one of the ap's is configured in this way contact me directly--I've been trying to collect the info I need to identify what's going on. Sam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 18:34:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB97616A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:34:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (smtprelay01.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0369F43D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:34:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 31922 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2005 18:34:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([pbs]775067@[217.187.178.48]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 30 Jul 2005 18:34:03 -0000 Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:34:21 +0200 From: Fabian Keil To: Warren Block Message-ID: <20050730203421.65a4b5d9@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20050728084834.X56124@wonkity.com> References: <200507272225.07899.freebsdbeni@spymac.com> <20050728084834.X56124@wonkity.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Signature_Sat__30_Jul_2005_20_34_21_+0200_Z/svgBWsjR9QD4eH"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, FreeBsdBeni Subject: Re: Reading the volume-id/label of a cd/dvd ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:34:06 -0000 --Signature_Sat__30_Jul_2005_20_34_21_+0200_Z/svgBWsjR9QD4eH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Warren Block wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, FreeBsdBeni wrote: >=20 > > Is there an easy way to get to know the volume id or disclabel of a cd = or > > dvd ? Mounting the cd/dvd just gives me the contents of the disc, but n= ot its > > "name". > > In k3b one can ask the info about a disc and get all the info about the > > inserted cd/dvd (disc type, tracks, sessions,...). But how do i get tha= t info > > without k3b ? Is there an easy way/solution ? >=20 > cdrecord can get some info from a CD; see the -toc and -atip options. To show the volume id one can use isoinfo, it's part of cdrtools as well. Fabian --=20 http://www.fabiankeil.de/ --Signature_Sat__30_Jul_2005_20_34_21_+0200_Z/svgBWsjR9QD4eH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC68gzoomUOj0wp30RAgHWAKCBF0jY6+D7MsEAqYKjKsxi3Dz63wCdE1l2 meSIH+RWh5G2biwcIqbbkus= =MKtz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Sat__30_Jul_2005_20_34_21_+0200_Z/svgBWsjR9QD4eH-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 18:41:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9869016A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:41:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E87543D46 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:41:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Message-ID: <42EBC9F0.3000902@intersonic.se> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:41:52 +0200 From: Per olof Ljungmark User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050502) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at inter-sonic.com Subject: sunbird X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:41:57 -0000 Hmmm, it did not get through to the list it seems, try again. * Anyone successfully built Sunbird on FreeBSD4 or 5? I thought I'd start off trying but was sort of baffled by all the ./configure options... Thanks, Per olof From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 18:53:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D992216A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:53:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (creme-brulee.marcuscom.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7518843D48 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:53:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6UIsLOv075878; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:54:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Per olof Ljungmark In-Reply-To: <42EBC9F0.3000902@intersonic.se> References: <42EBC9F0.3000902@intersonic.se> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-fW2+VgJeUPNv554B7F+1" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:53:28 -0400 Message-Id: <1122749608.24297.9.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sunbird X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:53:58 -0000 --=-fW2+VgJeUPNv554B7F+1 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 20:41 +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > Hmmm, it did not get through to the list it seems, try again. > * > Anyone successfully built Sunbird on FreeBSD4 or 5? I thought I'd start > off trying but was sort of baffled by all the ./configure options... We have an experimental port of it at http://www.marcuscom.com:8080/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ports. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-fW2+VgJeUPNv554B7F+1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC68yob2iPiv4Uz4cRAsNEAJ0asdp+Ao2Ozaw+Yw+ne1mywVhBtgCgiJQt WSnWopeClo29tVjNxt4YuO8= =bfEx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-fW2+VgJeUPNv554B7F+1-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 19:08:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF06316A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:08:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aymeric.muntz@free.fr) Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr (postfix3-1.free.fr [213.228.0.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9674E43D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:08:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aymeric.muntz@free.fr) Received: from serveur.thrruss.org (eur10-1-82-241-181-23.fbx.proxad.net [82.241.181.23]) by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434901734B2 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:08:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from artemis (artemis [192.168.2.2]) by serveur.thrruss.org (8.13.0/8.13.0) with SMTP id j6UJ96jP016707 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:09:06 +0200 From: "Aymeric MUNTZ" To: Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:08:25 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 Importance: Normal Subject: bind CTRL-ALT+DEL action X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:08:20 -0000 Is it possible to bind any action to combinated keys such as CTRL+ALT+DEL? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 19:11:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3646F16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:11:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wash@wananchi.com) Received: from ns2.wananchi.com (ns2.wananchi.com [62.8.64.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5002943D46 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:11:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wash@wananchi.com) Received: from wash by ns2.wananchi.com with local (Exim 4.51 #0 (FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE)) id 1DywjZ-000Fx9-RV by authid for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 22:10:57 +0300 Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 22:10:57 +0300 From: Odhiambo Washington To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050730191057.GA53366@ns2.wananchi.com> Mail-Followup-To: Odhiambo Washington , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050730104152.GH17171@ns2.wananchi.com> <20050730132033.GA2911@Alex.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050730132033.GA2911@Alex.lan> X-Disclaimer: Any views expressed in this message, where not explicitly attributed otherwise, are mine alone!. X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.9i (2005-03-13) X-Designation: Systems Administrator, Wananchi Online Ltd. X-Location: Nairobi, KE, East Africa. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: Re: Problem with IPFilter/IPNAT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:11:01 -0000 * On 30/07/05 15:20 +0200, Alex de Kruijff wrote: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 01:41:52PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > I am using IPFilter and IPNat on several FreeBSD boxes. They are mostly > > configured the same. > > > > Each box has two interfaces, public and internal, and acts as a router > > to the LAN which is 'behind' it. The LAN machines use the FreeBSD as the > > gateway, as well as a DNS server. I run cache-only config. > > > > The problem I have is that when, for any reason, the public link goes > > down, the machines on the LAN timeout when communicating. > > It sound like there tying to lookup hostnames via DNS or something like > this. > > Are you able to ping them with there ip addresses? > Are you able to ping them with there host names? Ping by IP addresses works. However, I have not tried ping by hostname since I have not setup any DNS or host entries for the machines on the LAN. I did not think this is a "REQUIREMENTS" at all. Is it?? So is this a DNS problem that I can resolve by just using /etc/hosts entries, maybe? Does my ipnat rules look okay? -Wash http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html -- +======================================================================+ |\ _,,,---,,_ | Odhiambo Washington Zzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ | Wananchi Online Ltd. www.wananchi.com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'| Tel: +254 20 313985-9 +254 20 313922 '---''(_/--' `-'\_) | GSM: +254 722 743223 +254 733 744121 +======================================================================+ It is said that the lonely eagle flies to the mountain peaks while the lowly ant crawls the ground, but cannot the soul of the ant soar as high as the eagle? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 19:11:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A49216A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:11:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (blackend.org [212.11.35.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A6743D6D for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:11:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from nosferatu.blackend.org (nosferatu.blackend.org [192.168.1.205]) by abigail.blackend.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6UJBNtn026830; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:11:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@abigail.blackend.org) Received: from nosferatu.blackend.org (localhost.blackend.org [127.0.0.1]) by nosferatu.blackend.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6UJBO0L000800; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:11:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@nosferatu.blackend.org) Received: (from marc@localhost) by nosferatu.blackend.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j6UJ3Yll000731; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:03:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:03:33 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille To: Erik =?iso-8859-1?B?TsO4cmdhYXJk?= Message-ID: <20050730190333.GA614@nosferatu.blackend.org> References: <20050730141302.GD596@gothic.blackend.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Useless-Header: blackend.org X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SOLVED: scanimage -L doesn't work as normal user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:11:31 -0000 On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 07:54:36PM +0200, Erik Nørgaard wrote: > Hi, > > OK, I have solved the problem, as was originally assumed it boils > down to getting the permissions right. > > To make Epson 2480 work, there is no need to patch the uscanner.c > or usbdevs files and rebuild that module. I did make that work > though - sort of, now, sane-find-scanner finds an unidentified > device on uscanner0, but scanimage correctly idenfies the scanner. > > This is what to do: In /usr/src/sys/dev/usb edit the files usbdevs > and uscanner.c, in usbdevs add a line: > > product EPSON 2480 0x0121 Perfection 2480 scanner > > and in uscanner.c add the line > > {{ USB_VENDOR_EPSON, USB_PRODUCT_EPSON_2480 }, 0 }, > > after the last EPSON scanner. Please submit a PR with these both lines. > > I don't know if there is any benefit from using the uscanner > device other than the ability to set permissions for the scanner > only. > Using uscanner(4) is "the FreeBSD way", ugen(4) is for USB devices without specific driver. For example you can remove "device ugen" from your kernel config and your scanner will continue to run... > Here's the trick: > > Create a file /etc/devfs.rules with the following: > > [devfsrules=10] > # Allow any user to access usb devices: uscanner and ugen > add path 'usb0' mode 0666 > add path 'usb1' mode 0666 > add path 'ugen*' mode 0666 These 3 lines are useless since you're using uscanner, sane-find-scanner or scanimage should only mention uscanner not ugen, etc. now. > add path 'uscanner*' mode 0666 > > The last line can be omitted if you don't use the uscanner device. > I think it is better to let "others" access rw the scanner device > than to add users to the operator group. > You have to use uscanner(4), period :) Marc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 19:23:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6550816A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:23:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07CC243D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:23:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.218] (c-24-1-232-64.hsd1.tx.comcast.net[24.1.232.64]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2005073019231201100hvjgge>; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:23:13 +0000 Message-ID: <42EBD3A0.5070407@computer.org> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:23:12 -0500 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050721) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sam Leffler References: <42EAD325.60707@errno.com> <42EAD80C.9060707@errno.com> <42EBC41E.4070102@computer.org> <42EBC77F.1010601@errno.com> In-Reply-To: <42EBC77F.1010601@errno.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: dhclient and wpa_supplicant X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:23:14 -0000 Sam Leffler wrote: > Eric Schuele wrote: > >> dhclient.conf contains >> =========================== >> interface "ath0" { >> #send option host-name "myhost"; >> #send option domain-name "nxdomain.org"; >> send dhcp-client-identifier "myhost"; >> >> media >> ### Home >> "ssid mode 11b channel 11 wepmode on weptxkey 1 wepkey >> 0x", >> ### Office >> "ssid > 0x"; >> request subnet-mask, broadcast-address, routers, >> domain-name-servers, domain-name; >> } > > > Do not use media statements to setup wireless parameters; this does not > work. You need to run wpa_supplicant and let it identify the network > and setup the key parameters. How do I tell wpa_supplicant about the network media? I had found an older post of yours regarding NOT doing it in dhclient.conf.... but I've found no other way to accomplish it. > >> >> wpa_supplicant.conf >> ============================= >> ctrl_interface=/var/run/wpa_supplicant >> ctrl_interface_group=wheel >> >> # Home Network >> network={ >> ssid="" >> scan_ssid=1 >> key_mgmt=NONE >> wep_tx_keyidx=0 >> wep_key0="" >> } >> >> # Office Network >> network={ >> ssid="" >> scan_ssid=1 >> key_mgmt=NONE >> wep_tx_keyidx=0 >> wep_key0="" >> } >> > > Not sure you need scan_ssid set, I'd leave it out. > > If you have problems try disabling auto-startup of ath0 and run > wpa_supplicant by hand with the -d flag to see what it's doing. Once > that's going then enable startup in rc.conf. If you continue to have > problems provide the output wpa_supplicant -d -i ath0 -c > /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf (or similar) when you have trouble. There is > also a pending issue with locating some ap's that are setup to hide > their ssid. If one of the ap's is configured in this way contact me > directly--I've been trying to collect the info I need to identify what's > going on. Both my APs (home and office) hide their ssids. One is a wrt54g (home), the other is linksys as well... though I forget the model at the moment (FWIW its a/b/g). What can I do to provide the info you need? > > Sam > -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 19:35:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E5D16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:35:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from mail.stovebolt.com (mail.stovebolt.com [66.221.101.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE8D43D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:35:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.101] (adsl-65-71-93-204.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [65.71.93.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.stovebolt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D3F53FC39 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:35:51 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:35:31 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: f-q Message-ID: <6F3E35504F64CB7D16926AA4@Paul-Schmehls-Computer.local> In-Reply-To: <20050730065757.GA96641@holestein.holy.cow> References: <20050730065757.GA96641@holestein.holy.cow> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.0 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: Shell script help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:35:58 -0000 --On July 30, 2005 2:57:57 AM -0400 Parv wrote: > in message , > wrote Paul Schmehl thusly... >> >> Running what I *thought* was the same sed command in the Makefile >> of the port doesn't solve the problem of the formatting of the man >> pages, but it doesn't generate any errors either: >> >> @${SED} -e '/man\.macros/r man.macros' -e '/man\.macros/d' >> ${WRKSRC}/doc/${f} \ >> > ${WRKDIR}/${f} >> >> Can someone explain what the sed command is doing? The man page >> isn't much help. > > In the 1st part, sed sends the output of file 'man.macros' to > standard out if it exists (otherwise no worries) when sed sees the > 'man\.macros' pattern. > > And the 2d part, just deletes that pattern. > > There in the sed(1) man page all is. Or, line by line try this ... > > rm -f q ; echo polka > p > { echo p ; echo q; echo p; } | sed -e '/p/r p' -e '/p/d' > { echo p ; echo q; echo p; } | sed -e '/p/r q' -e '/p/d' > Thanks! That was the answer. I had to fiddle with it for a while before I understood what it was doing, but it does exactly what I need it to do now. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 19:44:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E4016A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:44:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2D843D46 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:44:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.218] (c-24-1-232-64.hsd1.tx.comcast.net[24.1.232.64]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2005073019443901300qfrbje>; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:44:39 +0000 Message-ID: <42EBD8A7.4030208@computer.org> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:44:39 -0500 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050721) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Per olof Ljungmark References: <42EBC9F0.3000902@intersonic.se> In-Reply-To: <42EBC9F0.3000902@intersonic.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sunbird X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:44:41 -0000 Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > Hmmm, it did not get through to the list it seems, try again. > * > Anyone successfully built Sunbird on FreeBSD4 or 5? I thought I'd start > off trying but was sort of baffled by all the ./configure options... Its in the ports tree... /usr/ports/www/linux-sunbird just make install clean Works well enough for me (on RELENG_5 and RELENG_6). Though I very much wish it would send my 'ToDo' list to stdout given a switch (like ical). > > Thanks, > Per olof > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 21:26:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB73216A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:26:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 125FA43D46 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:26:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.246.232] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A07D8CE1014E; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:26:21 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6ULRYEs010032; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:27:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6ULRS21010031; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:27:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: Nikolas Britton References: <4kbr4k9x6z.r4k@mail.opusnet.com> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:27:28 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Nikolas Britton's message of "Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:58:24 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Total weight between 10 and 14. X-Spam-Tests-Failed: SPAMDOMAINS, SPFf, WEIGHT10 [11] Cc: "Gary W. Swearingen" , FreeBSD - Questions Subject: Re: Using a hard drive without partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:26:28 -0000 Nikolas Britton writes: > But in FreeBSD your disk needs a slice otherwise it's not compatable > with fdisk / bsdlabel / growfs... I think. One of the main reasons for using a DD disk is so you don't have to mess with those things; they are of no use on a DD disk (assuming that you cover the whole disk with the file system). You haven't said how you plan to use this disk. If you're going to use it for raw data, you don't need disk labels or file systems or anything, you just write (eg, >) and read (eg, <) from it, or tell your custom driver about it. Do you want to mount it for files? >> You've got a standard partition table with the s1 entry in use, which >> is not "dangerous". The FAQ has an entry on DD disks. > > But it is "dangerous" because it starts at sector 0. I've read that > FAQ as well as greg's book, Lucas's book, unix power tools, the man > pages, handbook, etc. I will reread them again. WHAT is dangerous? Yes, a DD disk is (more) dangerous, but you don't have a DD disk. Your s1 doesn't start at sector 0 and so it isn't considered dangerous. Your s1 probably starts at the 64th sector. And I'll take a guess that your "newfs /dev/ad0s1" (if it works at all) is starting the new filesystem at least 16 sectors further on, after the disk label area (which it probably assumes is there). The newfs manpage says that the disk must first be labeled. > I'm going to be working on this server today and I'll post some of the > details of fdisk, bsdlabel, etc. to see if I can help clarify things. Yeah, I'd like to see your "bsdlabel ad0s1"; I'm wondering if you have a disk label with "c" when you think you have no disk label. Can you mount /dev/ad0s1c? Can you mount dev/ad0s1? Seems to me you'd either want to be safe and use "ad0s1a" or live dangerously and use "ad0a" or even "ad0" if it seems to work. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 21:38:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 412AD16A44E for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:38:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B4D43D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:38:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localhost [70.98.246.232] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A33737300128; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:37:59 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6ULdCAm010195; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:39:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6ULd2Ux010194; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:39:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: Glenn Dawson References: <6.2.5.1.2.20050730073623.00c12950@wixb.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050730100508.13b4b060@cobalt.antimatter.net> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:39:02 -0700 In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20050730100508.13b4b060@cobalt.antimatter.net> (Glenn Dawson's message of "Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:08:07 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "J.D. Bronson" Subject: Re: bsdlabel question.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:38:17 -0000 Glenn Dawson writes: > pp->p_fstype = FS_BSDFFS; > pp->p_fsize = sblock.fs_fsize; > pp->p_frag = sblock.fs_frag; > pp->p_cpg = sblock.fs_fpg; > } > The last line is the one that inserts that number. sblock.fs_fpg is the number of frags per cylinder grounp. Glenn, can you tell me which of those numbers, if any, can be changed after a newfs has been done and the file system well occupied with data? (The lousy sysinstall disk labeler wiped out several of my disk labels and I restored them with zeroes in those fields of the disk label. It worked OK, but I'm guessing it only worked because the "bsdlabel" defaults were the same as they were when I first did "bsdlabel...; newfs...". If defaults had changed or I used non-default values the first time, I'd have been SOL, right? Or do those values just serve as optimization/tuning values for the kernel?) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 21:58:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0126B16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:58:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [66.127.85.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5B743D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:57:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from [66.127.85.93] ([66.127.85.93]) (authenticated bits=0) by ebb.errno.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j6ULvvms094242 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:57:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Message-ID: <42EBF80C.7030702@errno.com> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:58:36 -0700 From: Sam Leffler Organization: Errno Consulting User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Schuele References: <42EAD325.60707@errno.com> <42EAD80C.9060707@errno.com> <42EBC41E.4070102@computer.org> <42EBC77F.1010601@errno.com> <42EBD3A0.5070407@computer.org> In-Reply-To: <42EBD3A0.5070407@computer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: dhclient and wpa_supplicant X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:58:00 -0000 Eric Schuele wrote: > Sam Leffler wrote: > >> Eric Schuele wrote: >> > > > >>> dhclient.conf contains >>> =========================== >>> interface "ath0" { >>> #send option host-name "myhost"; >>> #send option domain-name "nxdomain.org"; >>> send dhcp-client-identifier "myhost"; >>> >>> media >>> ### Home >>> "ssid mode 11b channel 11 wepmode on weptxkey 1 wepkey >>> 0x", >>> ### Office >>> "ssid >> 0x"; >>> request subnet-mask, broadcast-address, routers, >>> domain-name-servers, domain-name; >>> } >> >> >> >> Do not use media statements to setup wireless parameters; this does >> not work. You need to run wpa_supplicant and let it identify the >> network and setup the key parameters. > > > How do I tell wpa_supplicant about the network media? I had found an > older post of yours regarding NOT doing it in dhclient.conf.... but I've > found no other way to accomplish it. The above dhclient.conf lists media settings that are all handled by wpa_supplicant so you don't specify any of them. Specifically you set ssid, band, channel, and wep parameters; all these are handled by wpa_supplicant. The intent is that dhclient deal only with the dhcp protocol and stop being involved in the discovery and selection of wireless networks (a job wpa_supplicant is better equipped to handle). > >> >>> >>> wpa_supplicant.conf >>> ============================= >>> ctrl_interface=/var/run/wpa_supplicant >>> ctrl_interface_group=wheel >>> >>> # Home Network >>> network={ >>> ssid="" >>> scan_ssid=1 >>> key_mgmt=NONE >>> wep_tx_keyidx=0 >>> wep_key0="" >>> } >>> >>> # Office Network >>> network={ >>> ssid="" >>> scan_ssid=1 >>> key_mgmt=NONE >>> wep_tx_keyidx=0 >>> wep_key0="" >>> } >>> >> >> Not sure you need scan_ssid set, I'd leave it out. >> >> If you have problems try disabling auto-startup of ath0 and run >> wpa_supplicant by hand with the -d flag to see what it's doing. Once >> that's going then enable startup in rc.conf. If you continue to have >> problems provide the output wpa_supplicant -d -i ath0 -c >> /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf (or similar) when you have trouble. There is >> also a pending issue with locating some ap's that are setup to hide >> their ssid. If one of the ap's is configured in this way contact me >> directly--I've been trying to collect the info I need to identify >> what's going on. > > > Both my APs (home and office) hide their ssids. One is a wrt54g (home), > the other is linksys as well... though I forget the model at the moment > (FWIW its a/b/g). What can I do to provide the info you need? These should work; I've had reports of problems with certain Cisco ap's. Note however that configuring an ap to hide it's ssid adds no real security. Sam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 22:55:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DABBB16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 22:55:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288F343D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 22:55:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 8224184F81; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 08:25:12 +0930 (CST) Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 08:25:12 +0930 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Chuck Swiger Message-ID: <20050730225512.GM75379@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20050730055013.GA57362@localhost.local> <20050730062425.GK75379@wantadilla.lemis.com> <42EBC3F1.5040501@pkix.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5V5c01chtBAiSHoy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42EBC3F1.5040501@pkix.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Cc: cdelsey@qwest.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Growisofs seg faults with DVD-RAM. Anybody else seen this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 22:55:15 -0000 --5V5c01chtBAiSHoy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday, 30 July 2005 at 14:16:17 -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> On Friday, 29 July 2005 at 22:50:13 -0700, Carl Delsey wrote: >>> I was trying to use growisofs to write to a DVD-RAM and it kept >>> seg faulting. It worked fine with a DVD-R. >>> >>> I tracked the problem down to place in the code where growisofs >>> tries to perform an operation on a file handle it has already >>> closed. >>> >>> I've implemented a workaround already. The problem is, that by my >>> reckoning, this should affect anybody who is trying to use a DVD-RAM >>> (not DVD+RW) with FreeBSD, but I haven't found any references to the >>> problem on the net. >> >> My guess is that DVD-RAM isn't popular enough, and that people who >> have had problems with it haven't had the understanding to track the >> bug down. > > dvd+rw-tools doesn't support -RAM as well as other formats, in part because > the {+,-}R(W) formats are much more common, in part because there are some > pretty serious quirks in the older drives, but improvements would be > welcome. Carl's report and patch suggest that the biggest reason that dvd+rw-tools doesn't support -RAM is due a bug in the program, not in the drives. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --5V5c01chtBAiSHoy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC7AVQIubykFB6QiMRAvDJAJ9QhimIbKhtH33XaiQvdzm1t20xSACfS77k cTTBQ2O67vksWaVH8ASWF3M= =8Sza -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5V5c01chtBAiSHoy--