From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Nov 24 20:21:54 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA02978
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 20:21:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA02964
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 20:21:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.2/8.6.9) with ESMTP id UAA04574; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 20:20:50 -0800 (PST)
To: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
cc: imp@village.org (Warner Losh), jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com,
        peter@taronga.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Replacing sendmail (Re: non-root users binding to ports < 1024 (was: Re: BoS: Exploit for sendmail smtpd bug (ver. 8.7-8.8.2 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 25 Nov 1996 14:39:50 +1030."
             <199611250409.OAA27182@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> 
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 1996 20:20:49 -0800
Message-ID: <4572.848895649@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> How does this sound?  The /etc/sysconfig changes (and some minor /etc/rc
> changes for the sendmail case) are nice and straightforward and I'll 
> happily do those if this is accepted.

That sounds way too flexible and sensible for me.. :-)

No, seriously, sounds pretty neat just so long as starting sendmail
from /usr/local/etc/rc.d doesn't hose anything - I haven't looked to
see at which stage it's started in /etc/rc, but if there are any
ordering dependencies there then they might hose us.  Just something
to watch for.

					Jordan