Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 10:40:54 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Stefan Farfeleder <stefanf@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include Makefile Message-ID: <D0475105-A5E6-491D-A29A-644706037480@xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20050914165300.GG59453@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> References: <200509140901.j8E916mL044612@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050914095217.GC59453@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> <154E8DB1-C941-4477-9FB7-BD373DC11898@xcllnt.net> <20050914165300.GG59453@wombat.fafoe.narf.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sep 14, 2005, at 9:53 AM, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: >>> I waver between guarding the prototype with #ifndef __ASSEMBLER__ >>> and >>> moving it to another header, eg. <unistd.h>. Opinions? >> >> I would go with #ifndef __ASSEMBLER__. I think the prototype is >> essentially in the right header. I did test your patch and it does >> the trick... > > That would require fixing xorg-server's usage of the header too. I > don't know how difficult this is. In that case, you might as well get the prototype out of there. I have no suggestion where to put it yet... -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D0475105-A5E6-491D-A29A-644706037480>