Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 May 2005 22:39:10 -0400
From:      Adam Weinberger <adamw@magnesium.net>
To:        Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net>
Cc:        ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/py-wxPython24 Makefile
Message-ID:  <4284134E.4040202@magnesium.net>
In-Reply-To: <20050513014606.GA88528@voodoo.oberon.net>
References:  <200505122059.j4CKxGYI008314@repoman.freebsd.org> <4283D5EF.8070708@magnesium.net> <20050513014606.GA88528@voodoo.oberon.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kirill Ponomarew wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 06:17:19PM -0400, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> 
>>Kirill Ponomarew wrote:
>>
>>>krion       2005-05-12 20:59:16 UTC
>>>
>>> FreeBSD ports repository
>>>
>>> Modified files:
>>>   x11-toolkits/py-wxPython24 Makefile 
>>> Log:
>>> Fix INDEX build.
>>> 
>>> Revision  Changes    Path
>>> 1.48      +1 -1      ports/x11-toolkits/py-wxPython24/Makefile
>>
>>This wxGTK stuff has been a pretty big change. Can the ports tree be 
>>completely thawed now? There have been a ton of changes, and I don't 
>>exactly see the point of us still being in a partial ports freeze. The 
>>FreeBSD GNOME team has been holding off on some updates (e.x. gettext) 
>>for the thaw.
> 
> 
> Slush is over when RELEASE is announced, it's described on:
> http://www.freebsd.org/portmgr/qa.html
> 
> -Kirill

If that's the answer I was looking for, I could have read it off the 
page myself.

Perhaps I need to rephrase: why do we have a ports slush if we don't 
adhere to its terms? Please don't say "because it's the third item on 
the page."

# Adam


-- 
Adam Weinberger
adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org
adamw@vectors.cx    ||   adamw@gnome.org
http://www.vectors.cx



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4284134E.4040202>