Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:21:25 +0400 From: "Andrew P." <infofarmer@gmail.com> To: Rem P Roberti <remegius@comcast.net> Cc: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Portversion question Message-ID: <cb5206420510200921l570c268bl7b69039820fadde@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4357C1DC.2070505@comcast.net> References: <4357C1DC.2070505@comcast.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/20/05, Rem P Roberti <remegius@comcast.net> wrote: > This continues to vex me. Portversion is indicating as out of date that > which is apparently not out of date. For example, my current tree (done > this morning) indicates that apsfilter 7.2.6 should be current. > Pkg_info indicates that version as installed. Portversion indicates out > of date. What am I missing here? > > Thanks, > > Rem > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > portversion checks versions of your installed packages against INDEX database, not your ports tree. If you're using non-official cvsup server (or an official one, but not current), you can get into a situation when your ports tree lags behind your INDEX (usually updated with something like portsdb -uUF, i.e. fetch from a very current source) by weeks. Consider using another cvsup server.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420510200921l570c268bl7b69039820fadde>